Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 11:04 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:09:14 -0600, Janet Bostwick > > wrote: > Found it on line: > http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...5009341&page=1 > At $1.50/7oz I don't see it as any bargain, and I don't believe it is > better quality than the other major brands... The difference here is that I have had both ... first I watched major brand tuna decline massively in quality over the years, then I tried the Kirkland. No comparison. It's not a contest. > canned tuna is a natural > product and therefore will vary somewhat can to can regardless which > brand... Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. It's a major difference. > overall I find Bumblebee as good as any. And Costco doesn't > have their own cannery, all they do is have their label placed on some > other brand. You can read about it he http://www.costcoconnection.com/conn...04/?pg=75#pg75 nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote:
snip > > Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > snip > > nancy Since when did Tuna have loins? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: > > snip >> >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > Since when did Tuna have loins? Look it up! nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 8/26/2013 11:04 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:09:14 -0600, Janet Bostwick >> > wrote: > >> Found it on line: >> http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...5009341&page=1 >> At $1.50/7oz I don't see it as any bargain, and I don't believe it is >> better quality than the other major brands... > >The difference here is that I have had both ... first I watched >major brand tuna decline massively in quality over the years, >then I tried the Kirkland. No comparison. It's not a contest. > > > canned tuna is a natural >> product and therefore will vary somewhat can to can regardless which >> brand... > >Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >It's a major difference. > > > overall I find Bumblebee as good as any. And Costco doesn't >> have their own cannery, all they do is have their label placed on some >> other brand. > >You can read about it he > >http://www.costcoconnection.com/conn...04/?pg=75#pg75 > >nancy 'Nuff said. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 8/26/2013 11:04 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:09:14 -0600, Janet Bostwick >> > wrote: > >> Found it on line: >> http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...5009341&page=1 >> At $1.50/7oz I don't see it as any bargain, and I don't believe it is >> better quality than the other major brands... > >The difference here is that I have had both ... first I watched >major brand tuna decline massively in quality over the years, >then I tried the Kirkland. No comparison. It's not a contest. > > > canned tuna is a natural >> product and therefore will vary somewhat can to can regardless which >> brand... > >Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >It's a major difference. > > > overall I find Bumblebee as good as any. And Costco doesn't >> have their own cannery, all they do is have their label placed on some >> other brand. > >You can read about it he > >http://www.costcoconnection.com/conn...04/?pg=75#pg75 I read it but I'm not convinced.... the other major brands market *select* tuna too, also in 7 oz cans... COSTCO is very likely Bumble Bee/StarKist select. Most stores don't carry the select tuna because placed along side the standard tuna the price difference would keep folks from buying. In fact most folks buy the chunk tuna because it's cheaper and for most folks it's fine for tuna salad, after all it's all mashed up with lots of mayo, and all sorts of herb/spices/condiments with celery, onions, etc... with all folks add they all taste the same. To me the premium tuna is only worth the extra price if it's eaten straight from the can with no additions and no mashing, just lightly crumbled. Making the proverbial tuna salad from premium tuna is no differnt from using Royal Crown for a whisky sour. There is no COSTCO close to where I live now, the closest is on Lung Guyland... if ever I get the opportunity I will buy some and give it the test. When I feel like treating myself I'll buy tuna packed in olive oil and dump it on a bed of lettuce and vine ripened tomatoes with a squeeze of lemon and nothing else. Bumble Bee calls their select grade Prime Fillet, only available at select markets: http://www.bumblebee.com/products/tuna/ Nowadays most tuna brands come from the same canneries... all major market chains carry their own brand of tuna, only thing different is the label. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: > > > On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: > > > > snip > >> > >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > > > Since when did Tuna have loins? > > Look it up! > > nancy I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct terminology? http://www.richardfisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >> >>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>> >>> snip >>>> >>>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >> >>> Since when did Tuna have loins? >> >> Look it up! > I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar > way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, > never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct > terminology? You people? nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:48:05 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote: >On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young > wrote: > >>On 8/26/2013 11:04 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 20:09:14 -0600, Janet Bostwick >>> > wrote: >> >>> Found it on line: >>> http://forum.bodybuilding.com/showth...5009341&page=1 >>> At $1.50/7oz I don't see it as any bargain, and I don't believe it is >>> better quality than the other major brands... >> >>The difference here is that I have had both ... first I watched >>major brand tuna decline massively in quality over the years, >>then I tried the Kirkland. No comparison. It's not a contest. >> >> > canned tuna is a natural >>> product and therefore will vary somewhat can to can regardless which >>> brand... >> >>Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >>It's a major difference. >> >> > overall I find Bumblebee as good as any. And Costco doesn't >>> have their own cannery, all they do is have their label placed on some >>> other brand. >> >>You can read about it he >> >>http://www.costcoconnection.com/conn...04/?pg=75#pg75 > >I read it but I'm not convinced.... the other major brands market >*select* tuna too, also in 7 oz cans... COSTCO is very likely Bumble >Bee/StarKist select. Most stores don't carry the select tuna because >placed along side the standard tuna the price difference would keep >folks from buying. In fact most folks buy the chunk tuna because >it's cheaper and for most folks it's fine for tuna salad, after all >it's all mashed up with lots of mayo, and all sorts of >herb/spices/condiments with celery, onions, etc... with all folks add >they all taste the same. To me the premium tuna is only worth the >extra price if it's eaten straight from the can with no additions and >no mashing, just lightly crumbled. Making the proverbial tuna salad >from premium tuna is no differnt from using Royal Crown for a whisky >sour. There is no COSTCO close to where I live now, the closest is on >Lung Guyland... if ever I get the opportunity I will buy some and give >it the test. When I feel like treating myself I'll buy tuna packed in >olive oil and dump it on a bed of lettuce and vine ripened tomatoes >with a squeeze of lemon and nothing else. Bumble Bee calls their >select grade Prime Fillet, only available at select markets: >http://www.bumblebee.com/products/tuna/ >Nowadays most tuna brands come from the same canneries... all major >market chains carry their own brand of tuna, only thing different is >the label. > > You may be correct about sourcing. However, when I go to the grocery store and buy tuna, I have to shake the cans to pick out one with the least amount of liquids inside. I don't want a can half liquid and half flakes and mush. If I buy Kirkland it is totally solid. If I buy Chicken of the Sea at Costco, I've never had a can with a lot of liquid and bits and pieces. Typically there are maybe 3 pieces in a can. That has been my experience -- your mileage may vary. I'm content to buy my tuna at Costco. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy Young" > wrote in message ... > On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote: >> On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>>> >>>> snip >>>>> >>>>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >>> >>>> Since when did Tuna have loins? >>> >>> Look it up! > >> I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar >> way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, >> never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct >> terminology? > > You people? lol aye that gets to me too! -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: > > Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > It's a major difference. I don't buy much tuna, but you're inspiring me to try Kirkland. Thanks! -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, August 26, 2013 1:26:50 PM UTC-7, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote: > > > On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: > > >> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: > > >>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: > >>>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > > >>> Since when did Tuna have loins? > > >> Look it up! > > > I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar > > way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, > > never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct > > terminology? > > You people? > > nancy This guy needs to change his 'nym, because I do not find him helpful in the least. Watch the video: http://www.chefs-resources.com/Yellowfin-Tuna |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:07:44 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >> >> snip >>> >>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. > >> Since when did Tuna have loins? > >Look it up! Yup, loin is what a side is called on large fish. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT), Helpful person
> wrote: >On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >> >> > On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >> > >> > snip >> >> >> >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >> >> > Since when did Tuna have loins? >> >> Look it up! >> >> nancy > >I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar >way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, >never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct >terminology? Tuna does: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf9Orz0j28E |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:26:50 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote: >> On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >>> >>>> On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>>> >>>> snip >>>>> >>>>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >>> >>>> Since when did Tuna have loins? >>> >>> Look it up! > >> I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar >> way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, >> never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct >> terminology? > >You people? Alluding to this know nothing ghoul as a human is your being kind. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 12:51:55 -0700 (PDT), Helpful person > > wrote: > >>On Monday, August 26, 2013 3:07:44 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>> On 8/26/2013 2:38 PM, Helpful person wrote: >>> >>> > On Monday, August 26, 2013 2:26:13 PM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote: >>> > >>> > snip >>> >> >>> >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >>> >>> > Since when did Tuna have loins? >>> >>> Look it up! >>> >>> nancy >> >>I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar >>way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, >>never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct >>terminology? > > Tuna does: > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kf9Orz0j28E Hmm I *can* fillet fish but I am very much slower ![]() ok though ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 5:09 PM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: > >> >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >> It's a major difference. > > I don't buy much tuna, but you're inspiring me to try Kirkland. > Thanks! It's like it used to be when you paid extra for a can of solid white tuna, that's what you got, not a can of watery mush. i remember having conversations about it with Wayne Boatwright. That's what this tuna is like, solid white tuna. We'd been buying Bumblebee tuna in the gold can, or the pouch. They were still decent but not cheap. Anyway, it's from recommendations here on rfc that I started buying the Kirkland years ago. I really have no idea if supermarket canned tuna has improved. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 5:31 PM, wrote:
> On Monday, August 26, 2013 1:26:50 PM UTC-7, Nancy Young wrote: >> On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote: >>> I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar >>> way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, >>> never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct >>> terminology? >> >> You people? > This guy needs to change his 'nym, because I do not find him helpful in > the least. Right? (laugh) Talk about a misnomer! > Watch the video: > > http://www.chefs-resources.com/Yellowfin-Tuna Right now I don't have speakers connected to hear the video, I'll catch it when my desk is finished being set up. Thanks. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy Young" > wrote in message ... > On 8/26/2013 5:09 PM, sf wrote: >> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young >> > wrote: >> >>> >>> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >>> It's a major difference. >> >> I don't buy much tuna, but you're inspiring me to try Kirkland. >> Thanks! > > It's like it used to be when you paid extra for a can of solid white > tuna, that's what you got, not a can of watery mush. i remember > having conversations about it with Wayne Boatwright. That's what > this tuna is like, solid white tuna. > > We'd been buying Bumblebee tuna in the gold can, or the pouch. > They were still decent but not cheap. > > Anyway, it's from recommendations here on rfc that I started buying > the Kirkland years ago. I really have no idea if supermarket > canned tuna has improved. So, did Wayne go over to the dark side on facebook, (where most people seem to errr disappear to) or has he disappeared altogether? -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:02:23 +0100, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > So, did Wayne go over to the dark side on facebook, (where most people seem > to errr disappear to) or has he disappeared altogether? He's on FB under his real name. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 19:01:45 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: > On 8/26/2013 5:31 PM, wrote: > > On Monday, August 26, 2013 1:26:50 PM UTC-7, Nancy Young wrote: > >> On 8/26/2013 3:51 PM, Helpful person wrote: > > >>> I don't need to. Fish don't have loins. In a similar > >>> way chickens don't have fingers and caviar is from fish, > >>> never vegetables! Why can't you people use the correct > >>> terminology? > >> > >> You people? > > > This guy needs to change his 'nym, because I do not find him helpful in > > the least. > > Right? (laugh) Talk about a misnomer! > I thought the obvious misnomer was the whole point of that persona from the gitgo, because his sense of humor is a little "off" - he reminds me of "pooh". -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 00:02:23 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> So, did Wayne go over to the dark side on facebook, (where most people >> seem >> to errr disappear to) or has he disappeared altogether? > > He's on FB under his real name. Ahh ok ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/27/2013 12:03 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> http://money.cnn.com/magazines/money...0564/index.htm Thanks! nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/27/2013 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:11:09 -0400, Nancy Young wrote: > >> Other people here are much better at remembering prices, I hope >> someone has the answer. If I planned to go soon, I'd check. > > I think it was $2/can last time I looked. I don't usually price the > tuna, but I remember the price surprised me. > > Costco online says it's $16.27. > http://www2.costco.com/Browse/Produc..._827&topnav=bd I don't remember it being that high, of course I could be wrong. It's one of those things where if I need tuna, I pick up a package. Don't really notice the price. I thought it started with a 13 or a 15. The online prices don't seem to jibe with the warehouse prices, so it will be interesting to see if Janet (?) remembers to check today. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:03:21 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 15:48:05 -0400, Brooklyn1 wrote: > >> I read it but I'm not convinced.... the other major brands market >> *select* tuna too, also in 7 oz cans... COSTCO is very likely Bumble >> Bee/StarKist select. Most stores don't carry the select tuna because >> placed along side the standard tuna the price difference would keep >> folks from buying. In fact most folks buy the chunk tuna because >> it's cheaper and for most folks it's fine for tuna salad, after all >> it's all mashed up with lots of mayo, and all sorts of >> herb/spices/condiments with celery, onions, etc... with all folks add >> they all taste the same. To me the premium tuna is only worth the >> extra price if it's eaten straight from the can with no additions and >> no mashing, just lightly crumbled. Making the proverbial tuna salad >> from premium tuna is no differnt from using Royal Crown for a whisky >> sour. There is no COSTCO close to where I live now, the closest is on >> Lung Guyland... if ever I get the opportunity I will buy some and give >> it the test. When I feel like treating myself I'll buy tuna packed in >> olive oil and dump it on a bed of lettuce and vine ripened tomatoes >> with a squeeze of lemon and nothing else. Bumble Bee calls their >> select grade Prime Fillet, only available at select markets: >> http://www.bumblebee.com/products/tuna/ >> Nowadays most tuna brands come from the same canneries... all major >> market chains carry their own brand of tuna, only thing different is >> the label. > >http://money.cnn.com/magazines/money...0564/index.htm > >-sw thank you Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:28:35 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: >On 8/27/2013 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote: >> On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:11:09 -0400, Nancy Young wrote: >> >>> Other people here are much better at remembering prices, I hope >>> someone has the answer. If I planned to go soon, I'd check. >> >> I think it was $2/can last time I looked. I don't usually price the >> tuna, but I remember the price surprised me. >> >> Costco online says it's $16.27. >> http://www2.costco.com/Browse/Produc..._827&topnav=bd > >I don't remember it being that high, of course I could be wrong. >It's one of those things where if I need tuna, I pick up a package. >Don't really notice the price. I thought it started with a 13 or a >15. > >The online prices don't seem to jibe with the warehouse prices, so >it will be interesting to see if Janet (?) remembers to check today. > >nancy o.K., I just put it on my shopping list -- all caps, in bold. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/27/2013 10:07 AM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:28:35 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: >> The online prices don't seem to jibe with the warehouse prices, so >> it will be interesting to see if Janet (?) remembers to check today. > o.K., I just put it on my shopping list -- all caps, in bold. No pressure! (laugh) nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/26/2013 3:09 PM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 14:26:13 -0400, Nancy Young > > wrote: > >> >> Kirkland allows only the solid loin in one piece goes into the can. >> It's a major difference. > > I don't buy much tuna, but you're inspiring me to try Kirkland. > Thanks! > Ditto the Kirkland, a wonderful product. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:28:35 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote: > On 8/27/2013 12:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote: > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2013 22:11:09 -0400, Nancy Young wrote: > > > >> Other people here are much better at remembering prices, I hope > >> someone has the answer. If I planned to go soon, I'd check. > > > > I think it was $2/can last time I looked. I don't usually price the > > tuna, but I remember the price surprised me. > > > > Costco online says it's $16.27. > > http://www2.costco.com/Browse/Produc..._827&topnav=bd > > I don't remember it being that high, of course I could be wrong. > It's one of those things where if I need tuna, I pick up a package. > Don't really notice the price. I thought it started with a 13 or a > 15. > > The online prices don't seem to jibe with the warehouse prices, so > it will be interesting to see if Janet (?) remembers to check today. > Think about Amazon prices compared to prices you know at the local grocery store or anywhere else for that matter. Everything I've looked at has a HUGE profit built into the price - unless, of course, it's a loss leader sale. I have no idea how that works, but I bought big bar mats at a give away price recently (which were still a good deal with shipping factored in). -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> > Gary wrote: > > Each day when I let <ferrets> out of the cage, the first thing > > they do is examine the entire apartment. If there is *anything* new in > > any room, they run right to it. They have amazing recall. > > > I'm thinking they know it's new by the smell. Not at all. They have great eyesight and photographic memeories. They don't run around sniffing like a dog. They can look into each room from the doorway, then spot and run right to anything new. It doesn't even need to be something new...just moving something to another place will set them off. Of course, once they run to the "new thing" the sniffers go into gear too. :-D My mom sent me a small box of knitted hats and scarfs once. I opened it then set it on the floor. Later, I let the two furry ones out. Within 2 minutes, they spotted the new box on floor and here was the result: http://i43.tinypic.com/2q1x6rc.jpg They actually played with this new box for over an hour, relaxing on it, burrowing down inside, etc. heheheh G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > sf wrote: >> >> Gary wrote: >> > Each day when I let <ferrets> out of the cage, the first thing >> > they do is examine the entire apartment. If there is *anything* new in >> > any room, they run right to it. They have amazing recall. >> > >> I'm thinking they know it's new by the smell. > > Not at all. They have great eyesight and photographic memeories. They > don't run around sniffing like a dog. They can look into each room > from the doorway, then spot and run right to anything new. It doesn't > even need to be something new...just moving something to another place > will set them off. Of course, once they run to the "new thing" the > sniffers go into gear too. :-D > > My mom sent me a small box of knitted hats and scarfs once. I opened > it then set it on the floor. Later, I let the two furry ones out. > Within 2 minutes, they spotted the new box on floor and here was the > result: > http://i43.tinypic.com/2q1x6rc.jpg > > They actually played with this new box for over an hour, relaxing on > it, burrowing down inside, etc. heheheh Awwwwwwwwww ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "Gary" > wrote in message > ... >> sf wrote: >>> >>> Gary wrote: >>> > Each day when I let <ferrets> out of the cage, the first thing >>> > they do is examine the entire apartment. If there is *anything* new in >>> > any room, they run right to it. They have amazing recall. >>> > >>> I'm thinking they know it's new by the smell. >> >> Not at all. They have great eyesight and photographic memeories. They >> don't run around sniffing like a dog. They can look into each room >> from the doorway, then spot and run right to anything new. It doesn't >> even need to be something new...just moving something to another place >> will set them off. Of course, once they run to the "new thing" the >> sniffers go into gear too. :-D >> >> My mom sent me a small box of knitted hats and scarfs once. I opened >> it then set it on the floor. Later, I let the two furry ones out. >> Within 2 minutes, they spotted the new box on floor and here was the >> result: >> http://i43.tinypic.com/2q1x6rc.jpg >> >> They actually played with this new box for over an hour, relaxing on >> it, burrowing down inside, etc. heheheh > > Awwwwwwwwww ![]() > Strange to see ferrets as pets. When I was a child, some old men in the village kept ferrets for hunting rabbits and the ironmonger sold special wire leads and collars for them. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 10:30:47 AM UTC-7, graham wrote:
> > Strange to see ferrets as pets. When I was a child, some old men in the > village kept ferrets for hunting rabbits and the ironmonger sold special > wire leads and collars for them. Ferrets as pets are illegal in California, as are gerbils and sugar gliders. Other illegal pet animals include raccoons, chimpanzees, and African lions: http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nonga...es_table6.html |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "graham" > wrote in message ... > > "Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> "Gary" > wrote in message >> ... >>> sf wrote: >>>> >>>> Gary wrote: >>>> > Each day when I let <ferrets> out of the cage, the first thing >>>> > they do is examine the entire apartment. If there is *anything* new >>>> > in >>>> > any room, they run right to it. They have amazing recall. >>>> > >>>> I'm thinking they know it's new by the smell. >>> >>> Not at all. They have great eyesight and photographic memeories. They >>> don't run around sniffing like a dog. They can look into each room >>> from the doorway, then spot and run right to anything new. It doesn't >>> even need to be something new...just moving something to another place >>> will set them off. Of course, once they run to the "new thing" the >>> sniffers go into gear too. :-D >>> >>> My mom sent me a small box of knitted hats and scarfs once. I opened >>> it then set it on the floor. Later, I let the two furry ones out. >>> Within 2 minutes, they spotted the new box on floor and here was the >>> result: >>> http://i43.tinypic.com/2q1x6rc.jpg >>> >>> They actually played with this new box for over an hour, relaxing on >>> it, burrowing down inside, etc. heheheh >> >> Awwwwwwwwww ![]() >> > Strange to see ferrets as pets. When I was a child, some old men in the > village kept ferrets for hunting rabbits and the ironmonger sold special > wire leads and collars for them. Yes that is all we knew about them too. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What measuring cup to get? | General Cooking | |||
Measuring My Meat | General Cooking | |||
Jam making and measuring | Preserving | |||
Measuring density | Winemaking | |||
48 CC measuring cup | Cooking Equipment |