On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 03:10:42 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> I rebuild and clean computers like yours in my spare time for friends.

Your what?

A scumbag like you has "friends"?

Have you talked them all yet?

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:59:29 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> I like Facebook email notifications, too.

You like to act our in public a lot, needle-dick.

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 00:16:39 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> That's because you have so much spyware and adware installed on your
> computer.

Did you hack her computer Sqwerty?

Wow.

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:45:26 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> I just ate 2 pieces of 10 day-old Pizza Hut Supreme pan
> pizza.
>
> -sw

No one gives a flying **** you self-absorbed stalker-twit.

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 00:52:36 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> Sheryl Rosen also flounced out - she lasted about 36 hours, IIRC. I
> don't remember Peter ever being there, but all the better.
>
> -sw

Sez group-killer Steve Wertz as he chases more folks off the net like he
did Omelet...

On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 01:00:30 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> You really need to get some sun on those feet, Whitey.
>
> -sw

You really need to not be a racist ****off, sqwerty.

On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 00:47:58 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> nd foc
> course the constant begging for me to give them my email password to
> use the Friend Finder.

You NEED a friend-finder, you sociopath.

On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:25:50 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> They want you to be at their mercy.
>
> -sw

You always will be, you sawed off little jackoff.

Sqwertocracy aka casa boner aka mixatorium > wrote in
rec.food.cooking:

> needle-dick?

casa contenta > wrote:

> Your manifest hypocrisy defines you, truly.

You spend an awful lot of time trying to instruct the followers of this
group on what defines them as individuals. As if they actually look to an
obsessed stalkerk00k like you for life advice.

Never mind the fact that you're universally known as a group pariah whose
opinion of anyone is presumed by all to be just another skanky stalking
attack. Right, mixatorium casa bonertent?

mixatorium > wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Sep 2013 23:33:28 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> I think you'd be
>> surprised how Stepford we are.
>
> I think you're heading for a bad place, trust me.

Right, because people here are so universally stupid that they readily trust
the excretions of bizarre stalking k00ks. Right.

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:18:26 -0500, Groupkillas (R) wrote:

> people here are so universally stupid that they readily trust
> the excretions of bizarre stalking k00ks.

They sure trust you and Sqwerty, don't they?

mixatorium aka casa bonertent aka sqwertocracy wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:45:26 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> I just ate 2 pieces of 10 day-old Pizza Hut Supreme pan
>> pizza.
>>
>> -sw
>
> No one gives a flying **** you self-absorbed stalker-twit.

Stalker? Funny how it's YOU humping on each and every one of HIS posts, not
the other way around. The one who chases after the other is the stalker,
just FYI, k00k.

And of course you'll tell us, in spite of your 100+ stalker posts you put up
just today, that you're the stalkee. ROTFL@U dumbass. You actually do think
people are that stupid and haven't caught on to your stalkerk00k habits. Can
you say clueless?

Are you sure you even know what the word "stalker" means?

No?

Check a mirror, that is if you're allowed glass objects in your facility.
Then write "stalkerk00k" on the mirror so you don't forget.

HTH.

mixatorium > wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Sep 2013 15:25:50 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> They want you to be at their mercy.
>>
>> -sw
>
> You always will be, you sawed off little jackoff.

Hi, casa bonertent.

so complicated > wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 15:18:26 -0500, Groupkillas (R) wrote:
>
>> people here are so universally enlightened that they readily killfile
>> the excretions of bizarre stalking k00ks like casa boner.
..
>
> They sure trust you and Sqwerty, don't they?

Of course they trust the truth. That really ****s you up, doesn't it,
stalkerk00k boner?

On 9/10/2013 9:14 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>
> Terwilliger would expect us to believe a top-secret Air Force/military
> environment would allow him to access Facebook while at work? ROFLMAO!
> Anyone else buying into this?

I work for a DOD contractor and we're allowed to access FB, but when we
enter any social networking site, we get a warning on the browser and
have to accept responsibility for any use of it. Meaning getting fired
if we do/write/act in some way irresponsible.

--
CAPSLOCK€“Preventing Login Since 1980.

On 9/11/2013 12:45 AM, Sqwertz wrote:

> ObFood: I just ate 2 pieces of 10 day-old Pizza Hut Supreme pan
> pizza.

I'm having pizza too. I was in the mood for some Chinese food but I
never save the little brochures that they put in my mailbox anymore and
for some reason I can't find anywhere close that delivers tonight.
Since I have to work again in about a half hour for another few I didn't
feel like cooking. I ended up ordering a Papa John's pizza for delivery.

--
CAPSLOCK–Preventing Login Since 1980.

On Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:32:06 -0700, sf wrote:

> I would like it better if they closed the group and made it by
> invitation/request only. As it is anyone in the group can add any
> Tom, Dick or Hairy to it.

That's not correct. Even though anybody can preliminarily add
somebody to the group, they still have to be approved by a
moderator/admin. I think it will report that "So and so was added
by...[the invitor]" rather than the admin.

I'm not sure why there has to be 5 admins, though.

-sw

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:05:20 -0500, Groupkillas (R) wrote:

> hat really ****s you up, doesn't it,
> stalkerk00k boner?

K00k much martyb?

Sqwertz wrote:

>> all my Internet access at work is through an Air Force computer. (Before
>> the move we had commercial Internet access, and we could bring our own
>> computers in to work.) The military computers don't have any newsreader
>> software. I *could* participate using Google Groups, but the bandwidth is
>> so crappy that it would be an exercise in frustration -- much like
>> listening to you trying to count past ten.
>
> Use VNC (such as RealVNC, etc) through port 80 or 8080.
>
> I have yet to find an employer (or contractor) that sniffs/blocks browser
> connections to VNC servers. With moderate use it has low enough overhead
> that it doesn't show up on most radars. UNless you work for the French.

Well, I can't install any software on the military computers, and even if I
could, I don't want to lower my home network security settings to allow VNC
servers access to my home computer. Usenet just isn't that important to me.

Bob

On 9/10/13 9:14 PM, jmcquown wrote:

> Terwilliger would expect us to believe a top-secret Air Force/military
> environment would allow him to access Facebook while at work? ROFLMAO!
> Anyone else buying into this?
>
> Jill

I know government folks who use Facebook to gather information on war
criminals, illegal aliens, etc.