Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:41:38 -0600, casa contenta > wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 11:11 AM, Michel Boucher wrote: > > Dave Smith > wrote in > > : > > > >>> It's obviously to avoid killfiles based on names. Luckily > >>> for me, my killfiles are much more sophisticated than than. > >> > >> Not much point in KFing the constant nymshifters. The pathetic > >> loser will have changed by the next download of posts. You > >> have to feel sorry for someone who has had to come to terms > >> with the fact that he is such a loser that the only way his > >> posts have a chance of being seen is to constantly nymshift. > > > > But that's my point. I am not killfiling the name or the account. > > I can choose any combination of parameters to killfile. I have not > > seen a proper troll attack in years. > > > A "proper" one? > > What on earth is that anyway? Suffice it to know that there hasn't been a "proper" one here in years, so he's full of it. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ophelia" > wrote in
: >>>> But that's my point. I am not killfiling the name or the >>>> account. I can choose any combination of parameters to >>>> killfile. I have not seen a proper troll attack in years. >>> >>> What parameters do you use? >> >> That would be telling. > > Careful gtr! State secret don't you know ... or.. someone > trying to look really clever .... Not THAT clever...:-) -- Traditions are group efforts to keep the unexpected from happening. -- Barbara Tober |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 3:36 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:15:56 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > >> They're different for sure, almost in the way the original Wendy's fries >> were. > > Wendy's is another one I don't eat at. I tried it a billion years > ago, but couldn't get past that square patty. Burgers are supposed to > be round, damnit! Lol, even a White Castle? >> I don;t care as much for their new style, but they beat Burger King's >> batter dipped ones any day! > > Oh, god... I hated those things too (and also their seasoned fries) - > but I have good news for you: it's safe to return now. They are > serving unadulterated fries again and they are pretty darned good. Oh really? Awesome, I always preferred their flame-broiled burgers for taste anyway. I think they went to the batter fries when the English company owned them. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:23:27 -0600, casa contenta > wrote:
> Burger King has a weak copy of their burger with fries in the bun now. > Ew! Butties are aptly named. It's British for TIAD. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith > wrote in
: > Oh boohoo. I can't think of many situations where bullies are > more easily dealt with than a forum like this. Ignore them. > Filter them and their nymshifts. They are generally immature > assholes and when you stop having hissy fits over their posts > they get bored and look for somewhere else to play. The only real rule in a non-moderated group is that if you don't want to read it, don't open it. If you open it and then complain, no one with a clue will care. -- Traditions are group efforts to keep the unexpected from happening. -- Barbara Tober |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-13 5:21 PM, casa contenta wrote:
> > > Not unsound advice, but not wholly accurate either. > > Spin and marty have been working this and a few other groups for many > years, ignoring them doesn't phase them one iota. Works for me. What also works when dealing with twits who contributing to the downfall of a group is to filter them and the people who spend too much effort responding to them. If I filter an idiot and then keep seeing their idiocy quoted in whining responses to the them, I solve the problem by filtering the idiot who keeps replying and quoting. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-13 5:45 PM, sf wrote:
> > I think it's hilarious that spin has to > think up new nyms just to be seen. He must have a list a mile long > that he can't repeat because it's in someone's kill file. > Hilarious? I think it is pretty sad that someone would have to resort to that. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are an unbearable ass, but still compelled to try to make a public spectacle if themself. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Becca and I went out for a late lunch/early dinner this afternoon and
tried a new place... BreWings. http://brewingz.com/ Sports bar, heavy emphasis on beer and finger foods but I was pleasantly surprised. i had Fish and Chips and although the fish was the pre-made, frozen variety, it was pretty tasty. Becca has shrimp and chicken fingers and they were done very well. Standout was the Thai dipping sauce that was so good, I asked for a side dish for myself and used it as a dip for the battered cod. Used a Groupon certificate ($15 for $30 credit) and the bill came to $34... so we paid $19 total for a $34 tab... plus a $5 tip. We'll go back. George L |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 3:56 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-09-13 5:21 PM, casa contenta wrote: > >> >> >> Not unsound advice, but not wholly accurate either. >> >> Spin and marty have been working this and a few other groups for many >> years, ignoring them doesn't phase them one iota. > > > Works for me. What also works when dealing with twits who contributing > to the downfall of a group is to filter them and the people who spend > too much effort responding to them. If I filter an idiot and then keep > seeing their idiocy quoted in whining responses to the them, I solve the > problem by filtering the idiot who keeps replying and quoting. The problem is, not to oversimplify things, the actions of one man are not enough to overwhelm the actions of the trolls. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-13 6:16 PM, casa contenta wrote:
>> Works for me. What also works when dealing with twits who contributing >> to the downfall of a group is to filter them and the people who spend >> too much effort responding to them. If I filter an idiot and then keep >> seeing their idiocy quoted in whining responses to the them, I solve the >> problem by filtering the idiot who keeps replying and quoting. > > The problem is, not to oversimplify things, the actions of one man are > not enough to overwhelm the actions of the trolls. Think about it. They get some sort of cheap thrill out of the reaction. You have a couple choices. One of them is to stop giving them the reaction and the attention they crave. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michel Boucher" > wrote in message ... > "Ophelia" > wrote in > : > >>>>> But that's my point. I am not killfiling the name or the >>>>> account. I can choose any combination of parameters to >>>>> killfile. I have not seen a proper troll attack in years. >>>> >>>> What parameters do you use? >>> >>> That would be telling. >> >> Careful gtr! State secret don't you know ... or.. someone >> trying to look really clever .... > > Not THAT clever...:-) ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 5:59 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-09-13 5:45 PM, sf wrote: >> >> I think it's hilarious that spin has to >> think up new nyms just to be seen. He must have a list a mile long >> that he can't repeat because it's in someone's kill file. >> > > > Hilarious? I think it is pretty sad that someone would have to resort > to that. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are an > unbearable ass, but still compelled to try to make a public spectacle if > themself. I think it's pretty sad we have to discuss them to death. Whatever happened to "do not feed the trolls"? Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 6:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-09-13 6:16 PM, casa contenta wrote: > >>> Works for me. What also works when dealing with twits who contributing >>> to the downfall of a group is to filter them and the people who spend >>> too much effort responding to them. If I filter an idiot and then keep >>> seeing their idiocy quoted in whining responses to the them, I solve the >>> problem by filtering the idiot who keeps replying and quoting. >> >> The problem is, not to oversimplify things, the actions of one man are >> not enough to overwhelm the actions of the trolls. > > > Think about it. They get some sort of cheap thrill out of the reaction. > You have a couple choices. One of them is to stop giving them the > reaction and the attention they crave. Killing the original idiot and ignoring them seems an adequate response. It's not cowardice but giving the lowlife the respect they deserve. You can always ignore them if they are quoted. There's always someone who will read them and it is possible that the troll may have something to say and you can change your mind about killing them but that is unlikely. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 4:27 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-09-13 6:16 PM, casa contenta wrote: > >>> Works for me. What also works when dealing with twits who contributing >>> to the downfall of a group is to filter them and the people who spend >>> too much effort responding to them. If I filter an idiot and then keep >>> seeing their idiocy quoted in whining responses to the them, I solve the >>> problem by filtering the idiot who keeps replying and quoting. >> >> The problem is, not to oversimplify things, the actions of one man are >> not enough to overwhelm the actions of the trolls. > > > Think about it. They get some sort of cheap thrill out of the reaction. > You have a couple choices. One of them is to stop giving them the > reaction and the attention they crave. I can not argue that conclusion. It's a maintenance dose they're on, and positive or negative attention works equally as well. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-13 6:54 PM, casa contenta wrote:
>> >> Think about it. They get some sort of cheap thrill out of the reaction. >> You have a couple choices. One of them is to stop giving them the >> reaction and the attention they crave. > > I can not argue that conclusion. > > It's a maintenance dose they're on, and positive or negative attention > works equally as well. No. It is attention that they crave. Deny them the attention. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:24:57 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: > On 9/13/2013 5:15 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:29:11 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > > > >> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in > >>> this house like. > >> > >> Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... > > > > I don't even know what that is, furiously Googling.... > > > Buddig is a brand of really cheap, pressed, processed lunch meat. > I did Google, but didn't glean lunch meat out of what I found... it said something about being gluten free. Maybe I found a different Buddig. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:28:09 -0600, casa contenta > wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 3:15 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:29:11 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > > > >> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in > >>> this house like. > >> > >> Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... > > > > I don't even know what that is, furiously Googling.... > > > Think back to that old school lunch and before that army favorite meal: SOS. > > It's cheap chipped beef salted, smoked and made into a loaf, then sliced > thinly. > > Uck. Sounds perfectly awful! Between you and Jill, I don't need to know any more. Thanks. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/11/2013 8:17 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> And I regret it. > > It was just awful. > > Bread was so dry after the toasting even a quart of water wasn't enough to > choke that bitch down. I ordered the steak and cheese. I got maybe 1 ounce > of chopped steak that was so dry I had to blow the dust off. The Provolone > cheese was tasteless. They had no onions or Whiz. > > It was just disgusting. > > Why do people eat this crap? > > My boss used to like to eat at Subway's. We'd eat there on Friday every once in a while. Most of the time, he'd pay. The best lunch is a free lunch although some people refuse to acknowledge its existence. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:50:25 -0600, casa contenta > wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 3:36 PM, sf wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:15:56 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > > > >> They're different for sure, almost in the way the original Wendy's fries > >> were. > > > > Wendy's is another one I don't eat at. I tried it a billion years > > ago, but couldn't get past that square patty. Burgers are supposed to > > be round, damnit! > > Lol, even a White Castle? > Never had a White Castle, that's an Eastern thing isn't it? Frozen WC don't tempt me either. I may have spotted one White Castle outlet on the trip last year, but I wasn't tempted because I knew already that it was steamed and what they look like (gray and unappetizing). Blech. > > >> I don;t care as much for their new style, but they beat Burger King's > >> batter dipped ones any day! > > > > Oh, god... I hated those things too (and also their seasoned fries) - > > but I have good news for you: it's safe to return now. They are > > serving unadulterated fries again and they are pretty darned good. > > > Oh really? > > Awesome, I always preferred their flame-broiled burgers for taste > anyway. We particularly like their Jr. Whopper. It's a lot of food, but you can eat it and leave without feeling like a Thanksgiving Day float. > I think they went to the batter fries when the English company > owned them. To be honest, I don't keep track of who owns what but UK ownership and battered french fries make sense to me (think about the Fresh and Easy/Tesco fiasco). I'm surprised BK wasn't the one to introduce Butties to the American audience instead of fiddling around with our fries! -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 5:40 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:50:25 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > >> On 9/13/2013 3:36 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:15:56 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: >>> >>>> They're different for sure, almost in the way the original Wendy's fries >>>> were. >>> >>> Wendy's is another one I don't eat at. I tried it a billion years >>> ago, but couldn't get past that square patty. Burgers are supposed to >>> be round, damnit! >> >> Lol, even a White Castle? >> > Never had a White Castle, that's an Eastern thing isn't it? Frozen WC > don't tempt me either. I may have spotted one White Castle outlet on > the trip last year, but I wasn't tempted because I knew already that > it was steamed and what they look like (gray and unappetizing). > Blech. It is sort of a midwestern and eastern thing, iirc. It is steamed meat, onions and bun. Oddly, made freshly, they work! >> >>>> I don;t care as much for their new style, but they beat Burger King's >>>> batter dipped ones any day! >>> >>> Oh, god... I hated those things too (and also their seasoned fries) - >>> but I have good news for you: it's safe to return now. They are >>> serving unadulterated fries again and they are pretty darned good. >> >> >> Oh really? >> >> Awesome, I always preferred their flame-broiled burgers for taste >> anyway. > > We particularly like their Jr. Whopper. It's a lot of food, but you > can eat it and leave without feeling like a Thanksgiving Day float. I sometimes resemble that remark ;-0 > >> I think they went to the batter fries when the English company >> owned them. > > To be honest, I don't keep track of who owns what but UK ownership and > battered french fries make sense to me (think about the Fresh and > Easy/Tesco fiasco). I'm surprised BK wasn't the one to introduce > Butties to the American audience instead of fiddling around with our > fries! > That's too funny! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 7:25 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:24:57 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > >> On 9/13/2013 5:15 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:29:11 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in >>>>> this house like. >>>> >>>> Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... >>> >>> I don't even know what that is, furiously Googling.... >>> >> Buddig is a brand of really cheap, pressed, processed lunch meat. >> > I did Google, but didn't glean lunch meat out of what I found... it > said something about being gluten free. Maybe I found a different > Buddig. > > http://www.buddig.com/products_original.aspx This selection is what I call "lunch meat". I don't buy it. I've seen it in stores. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 7:26 PM, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:28:09 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > >> On 9/13/2013 3:15 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:29:11 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: >>> >>>> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in >>>>> this house like. >>>> >>>> Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... >>> >>> I don't even know what that is, furiously Googling.... >>> >> Think back to that old school lunch and before that army favorite meal: SOS. >> >> It's cheap chipped beef salted, smoked and made into a loaf, then sliced >> thinly. >> >> Uck. > > Sounds perfectly awful! Between you and Jill, I don't need to know > any more. Thanks. > Please do not equate whatever the hell they were talking about (Buddig?) with authentic creamed chipped beef. It's absolutely not the same thing. And my father wasn't in the Army. Heh. Buddig makes pressed meats. It's manufactured. Thinly sliced drippy injected chicken, smoked turkey, corned beef, roast beef. It's lunch meat, as I said before. Makes for some pretty crappy sandwiches. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 14:45:40 -0700, sf wrote:
> I think it's hilarious that spin has to > think up new nyms just to be seen. He must have a list a mile long > that he can't repeat because it's in someone's kill file. I only use these "nyms" to respond to you so there's no reason anybody else would killfile them. And I have a script that automatically generates them from IMDB names. Otherwise I'm ost an no one else amid all this ridiculous nonsense that you are single-handedly encouraging. Selurp it up Barbara! As always, -sw |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-13 21:32:38 +0000, sf said:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:18:56 -0700, gtr > wrote: > >> On 2013-09-13 16:00:57 +0000, sf said: >> >>> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:58:46 -0700, gtr > wrote: >>> >>>> On 2013-09-13 06:18:15 +0000, sf said: >>>> >>>>>> I love the taste of their burgers, and I love their fries. They have a >>>>>> shop 3 blocks from my house. But every time I eat one I feel slightly >>>>>> nauseated. So I don't eat them. I'm not saying it's bad beef or >>>>>> anything, but it seems damned rich. >>>>> >>>>> Which burger do you order, single, double... more? >>>> >>>> Single. I don't think I've ever ordered a double of anything. Maybe tequila. >>> >>> Maybe you have a beef allergy. >> >> But I have many thousands of beef experiences that were not accompanied >> by nausea. Perhaps I'm alergic to their napkins. > > If you're not used to eating fatty red meat, I'm not surprised you > reacted. My reaction to fat after being cutting back on it for a > while is a little more dramatic than yours... fortunately, it takes > more than an In N Out burger to do it. > > If you ever suspect food poisoning, but it wasn't bad enough to see a > doctor - you can always report it at this site Oh I know food poisoning alright. Maybe it's a change in physical attitude, I find the same queazy feeling overtakes me if I get their "Original 6 Dollar Burger", though not with their others. I eat fatty meats from time to time and though I've cut back on beef in recent years for convenience (the wife is reluctant), I've had no similar problems including kobe/wagyu beef which is pretty fatty. And this is how the list of foods "that disagree with me" begin (as my granny use to say). To day I have no foods that I've yet identified that "disagree with me". |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > On 2013-09-13 5:45 PM, sf wrote: >> >> I think it's hilarious that spin has to >> think up new nyms just to be seen. He must have a list a mile long >> that he can't repeat because it's in someone's kill file. >> > > > Hilarious? I think it is pretty sad that someone would have to resort to > that. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are an > unbearable ass, but still compelled to try to make a public spectacle if > themself. Too true. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/13/2013 8:16 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:51:45 -0400, jmcquown wrote: > >> On 9/13/2013 5:59 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2013-09-13 5:45 PM, sf wrote: >>>> >>>> I think it's hilarious that spin has to >>>> think up new nyms just to be seen. He must have a list a mile long >>>> that he can't repeat because it's in someone's kill file. >>> >>> Hilarious? I think it is pretty sad that someone would have to resort >>> to that. They are throwing in the towel and admitting that they are an >>> unbearable ass, but still compelled to try to make a public spectacle if >>> themself. >> >> I think it's pretty sad we have to discuss them to death. Whatever >> happened to "do not feed the trolls"? > > These ARE the trolls, Jill. > > I've kept my mouth pretty tightly shut this whole time amidst all the > mess that Barbara and her Boner are causing. I can't vouch for Marty, > though. > > ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles > cippolina onions: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ > > Try and get something like THAT at Subway. > > -sw > Looks pretty darned good! Of course I could only eat half of it. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:09:49 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote: > Please do not equate whatever the hell they were talking about (Buddig?) > with authentic creamed chipped beef. It's absolutely not the same > thing. And my father wasn't in the Army. Heh. Don't worry, my father and grandfather were in the Army Air Corps so my grandmother made it from time to time and I absolutely loved it. I still haven't tried chipped beef in a jar, because I was so scarred by the other garbage I bought (a Buttig-like substance) that I'm still scared to give it another shot. > -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, September 13, 2013 12:41:38 PM UTC-7, casa contenta wrote:
> On 9/13/2013 11:11 AM, Michel Boucher wrote: > > > Dave Smith > wrote in > > > > But that's my point. I am not killfiling the name or the account. > > I can choose any combination of parameters to killfile. I have not > > seen a proper troll attack in years. > > A "proper" one? > > What on earth is that anyway? Ahhh... Nobody could compare to the Databasix crew. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles > cippolina onions: > > http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ > > Try and get something like THAT at Subway. I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, or it is something special? -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... >> ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles >> cippolina onions: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ >> >> Try and get something like THAT at Subway. >> >> -sw >> > Looks pretty darned good! Of course I could only eat half of it. I'll share ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2013-09-14, Ophelia > wrote:
> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, or > it is something special? It's a classic grilled sandwich. Essentially, it's two slices of rye bread w/ corned beef, swiss cheese, and sauerkraut w/ russion dressing, inside, and then grill (griddle) toasted like a grilled cheese sammy. Lotta variations, but that's the basics. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2013-09-14, Ophelia > wrote: >> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, >> or >> it is something special? > > It's a classic grilled sandwich. Essentially, it's two slices of rye > bread w/ corned beef, swiss cheese, and sauerkraut w/ russion > dressing, inside, and then grill (griddle) toasted like a grilled > cheese sammy. Lotta variations, but that's the basics. Oh! Thanks ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/14/2013 6:00 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > ... > >> ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles >> cippolina onions: >> >> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ >> >> Try and get something like THAT at Subway. > > I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, > or it is something special? > Put simply, a "reuben" is a hot corned beef sandwich. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 9/14/2013 6:00 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles >>> cippolina onions: >>> >>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ >>> >>> Try and get something like THAT at Subway. >> >> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, >> or it is something special? >> > Put simply, a "reuben" is a hot corned beef sandwich. Thank you ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "jmcquown" > wrote in message > ... >> On 9/14/2013 6:00 AM, Ophelia wrote: >>> >>> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>>> ObFood: A Texas-style Super Reuben for dinner. With balsamic pickles >>>> cippolina onions: >>>> >>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/sqwertz...0861/lightbox/ >>>> >>>> Try and get something like THAT at Subway. >>> >>> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a roll, >>> or it is something special? >>> >> Put simply, a "reuben" is a hot corned beef sandwich. > > Thank you ![]() Oops that was nobob ... sorry ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, September 13, 2013 2:29:11 PM UTC-5, casa contenta wrote:
> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > > > > > > "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message > > > ... > > >> Ed Pawlowski wrote: > > >>> > > >>> I'm amazed that they have so many locations and as a corporation seem > > >>> to be doing very well. > > >> > > >> Just proves what I've always said... the masses have TIAD. I've > > >> never eaten at Subway but I did walk into the new one that recently > > >> opened in town. I did a quick look-see and exited... first thing I > > >> noticed was it smelled foul, not at all like deli meats, and when I > > >> looked at what they were slicing it was that weird pressed meat that > > >> makes SPAM seem like a fine ham... I'd rather have a SPAM reuben than > > >> Subway dreck. I don't think the Sub in Subway stands for a Submarine > > >> sandwich... the Sub in Subway means Substandard. > > > > > > To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in > > > this house like. > > > > Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... There is a picture of Julie's family in the margin of the dictionary, next to the entry for White trash. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, September 13, 2013 6:26:47 PM UTC-5, sf wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:28:09 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > > > > > On 9/13/2013 3:15 PM, sf wrote: > > > > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:29:11 -0600, casa contenta > wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 9/12/2013 9:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> To me the meat is akin to Buddig which for some reason the people in > > > >>> this house like. > > > >> > > > >> Oooh, not good, we avoid the stuff here... > > > > > > > > I don't even know what that is, furiously Googling.... > > > > > > > Think back to that old school lunch and before that army favorite meal: SOS. > > > > > > It's cheap chipped beef salted, smoked and made into a loaf, then sliced > > > thinly. > > > > > > Uck. > > > > Sounds perfectly awful! Between you and Jill, I don't need to know > > any more. Thanks. > It's the sort of food that the lower classes consume in the book, *1984*. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/14/2013 6:33 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "notbob" > wrote in message > ... >> On 2013-09-14, Ophelia > wrote: >>> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a >>> roll, or >>> it is something special? >> >> It's a classic grilled sandwich. Essentially, it's two slices of rye >> bread w/ corned beef, swiss cheese, and sauerkraut w/ russion >> dressing, inside, and then grill (griddle) toasted like a grilled >> cheese sammy. Lotta variations, but that's the basics. Since I try for a no-fat diet, meaning restricted in fact, I don't eat Reubens but they used to be my favorite sandwiches, so much so that I remember the first one I ever ate. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "James Silverton" > wrote in message ... > On 9/14/2013 6:33 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "notbob" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On 2013-09-14, Ophelia > wrote: >>>> I asked before but don't remember a reply ... Is a Reuben just a >>>> roll, or >>>> it is something special? >>> >>> It's a classic grilled sandwich. Essentially, it's two slices of rye >>> bread w/ corned beef, swiss cheese, and sauerkraut w/ russion >>> dressing, inside, and then grill (griddle) toasted like a grilled >>> cheese sammy. Lotta variations, but that's the basics. > > > Since I try for a no-fat diet, meaning restricted in fact, I don't eat > Reubens but they used to be my favorite sandwiches, so much so that I > remember the first one I ever ate. I have the pleasure yet to come ![]() blue moon? A birthday treat perhaps? Looking at bob's description again, I see 'corned beef' I know that your corned beef is not as we know it! The only stuff we have here is canned ![]() -- -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Subway's Meatball Marinara | Barbecue | |||
The Stench of Subway | Restaurants | |||
New Subway Commercial | General Cooking | |||
Subway Cookies | General Cooking | |||
Subway Never Has Any FOOD | General Cooking |