Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A
kitchenAid. Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the convection mode? Any suggestions appreciated. Isaac |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote:
> I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > kitchenAid. > > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > convection mode? > > Any suggestions appreciated. > I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote:
>I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A >kitchenAid. > >Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > >The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be >cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that >I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > >Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the >convection mode? > >Any suggestions appreciated. > >Isaac Convection ovens have a fan that blows the hot air around to give a faster and more even heat. If what you are cooking is in a deep pan, it makes little difference. Our instructions recommend using shallow pans so the meat is exposed more. It also recommends higher temperatures than most people cook at and it gives very good results. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 11:53:36 PM UTC-10, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: > > > > >I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > > >kitchenAid. > > > > > >Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > > > > >The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > > >cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > > >I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > > > > >Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > > >convection mode? > > > > > >Any suggestions appreciated. > > > > > >Isaac > > > > Convection ovens have a fan that blows the hot air around to give a > > faster and more even heat. If what you are cooking is in a deep pan, > > it makes little difference. Our instructions recommend using shallow > > pans so the meat is exposed more. It also recommends higher > > temperatures than most people cook at and it gives very good results. I think you are correct about the higher temperatures being useful. Unfortunately, most ovens seem to compensate for the higher heat transfer of the oven by reducing the set temperature. I think that the convection setting is better for pizza but it really messes up Dutch babies and, I assume, Yorkshire puddings. I had some great Yorkshire pudding in Wales. It was the first time I ever had the stuff and I had to thank the cook, who had great pride in them. As it goes, it seems the folks in the UK like their beef well done nor are they big eaters of grilled steak. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, October 7, 2013 2:06:36 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: > > > > >I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > > >kitchenAid. > > > > > >Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > > > > >The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > > >cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > > >I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > > > > >Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > > >convection mode? > > > > > >Any suggestions appreciated. > > > > > >Isaac > > > > It certainly does cut cooking time, very noticeably for something like > > a big turkey. > > > > I also find it great for Yorkshire Puds - that surprised me - did it > > by accident the first time but I suppose it is simply circulating the > > hot air, not creating a lower temp draft as it would if you suddenly > > opened the door. It is also good if for instance you have two large > > trays of cookies in it. > > > > I wouldn't be without convection ![]() Thanks for the info. I'll try to make this with the convection. What temperature do you use? The ones that I had were about 6" in diameter. Are there special pans for this? Thanks. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/7/13 7:36 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> I think you are correct about the higher temperatures being useful. Unfortunately, > most ovens seem to compensate for the higher heat transfer of the oven by reducing > the set temperature. Fortunately, every one I've sen does so by only 25 deg. F, so you can easily compensate. -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() sf wrote: > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: > > > I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > > kitchenAid. > > > > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > > > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > > > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > > convection mode? > > > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > > > I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like > Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. Well, in a standard convection oven. The same goes for most cakes as well as the unidirectional fan driven airflow will tend to make them lopsided. Some high end commercial convection ovens reverse the fan(s) every minute or so to prevent lopsided baking. Most everything else will do nicely with convection on since it helps keep the temperature more even in the oven. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pete C." > wrote in message . com... > > sf wrote: >> >> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: >> >> > I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A >> > kitchenAid. >> > >> > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. >> > >> > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be >> > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean >> > that >> > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? >> > >> > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the >> > convection mode? >> > >> > Any suggestions appreciated. >> > >> >> I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like >> Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. > > Well, in a standard convection oven. The same goes for most cakes as > well as the unidirectional fan driven airflow will tend to make them > lopsided. Some high end commercial convection ovens reverse the fan(s) > every minute or so to prevent lopsided baking. Most everything else will > do nicely with convection on since it helps keep the temperature more > even in the oven. I have a Bosch oven that I use in convection mode all the time as the temperature swings in the normal baking and roasting modes are too great. I have never experienced lopsidedness in any of my cakes or soufflés using convection mode. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 11:15:57 -0500, "Pete C." >
wrote: > > sf wrote: > > > > On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: > > > > > I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > > > kitchenAid. > > > > > > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > > > > > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > > > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > > > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > > > > > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > > > convection mode? > > > > > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > > > > > > I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like > > Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. > > Well, in a standard convection oven. The same goes for most cakes as > well as the unidirectional fan driven airflow will tend to make them > lopsided. Some high end commercial convection ovens reverse the fan(s) > every minute or so to prevent lopsided baking. Most everything else will > do nicely with convection on since it helps keep the temperature more > even in the oven. I am a home cook and wouldn't use the convect mode for anything I wanted lift on because they simply do not get as high with convection mode as they do when the heat comes only from the bottom. I don't even like to bake cookies on convect. My ovens heat evenly and I don't have hot/cold spots, so that part is moot. I don't use convect when roasting whole chickens either, because turning the heat up to 400-425° and using a vertical roaster works well for me. They come out evenly cooked, juicy (including the white meat) and well browned. Maybe convect has a purpose in a commercial setting, but I am not a commercial baker, I don't like commercially baked cookies and I haven't found convect to be a useful option when baking or roasting. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Oct 2013 10:49:34 -0600, "graham" > wrote:
> >"Pete C." > wrote in message .com... >> >> sf wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: >>> >>> > I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A >>> > kitchenAid. >>> > >>> > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. >>> > >>> > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be >>> > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean >>> > that >>> > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? >>> > >>> > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the >>> > convection mode? >>> > >>> > Any suggestions appreciated. >>> > >>> >>> I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like >>> Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. >> >> Well, in a standard convection oven. The same goes for most cakes as >> well as the unidirectional fan driven airflow will tend to make them >> lopsided. Some high end commercial convection ovens reverse the fan(s) >> every minute or so to prevent lopsided baking. Most everything else will >> do nicely with convection on since it helps keep the temperature more >> even in the oven. > >I have a Bosch oven that I use in convection mode all the time as the >temperature swings in the normal baking and roasting modes are too great. I >have never experienced lopsidedness in any of my cakes or soufflés using >convection mode. >Graham > I do all my baking - ALL of it - on convection and the only side effect I have noticed is evenly cooked foods. Pastries, popovers, cakes, pies, breads, roasts - you name, it, the convection treats it kindly. I am on my second range with convection and have been using the feature for 20+ years. Boron |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote:
>I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A >kitchenAid. > >Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > >The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be >cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that >I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > >Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the >convection mode? > >Any suggestions appreciated. > >Isaac I don't use convection with bread baking as I find that the airflow dries the dough skin to quickly to allow for maximum loft. Others here disagree. I especially like the convection feature with pizza because the topping get evenly done and do not simmer and stew and make a wet pizza. I find with three racks of cookies that I still have to rotate the pans from top to bottom in order to get even cooking. I've had 2 different ovens with the feature, starting about 1985. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/7/2013 3:53 AM, pltrgyst wrote:
> On 10/7/13 7:36 AM, dsi1 wrote: > >> I think you are correct about the higher temperatures being useful. >> Unfortunately, >> most ovens seem to compensate for the higher heat transfer of the oven >> by reducing >> the set temperature. > > Fortunately, every one I've sen does so by only 25 deg. F, so you can > easily compensate. > > -- Larry > > This is true. I'll try to use the convection setting more than I have been. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/7/2013 7:36 AM, dsi1 wrote:
snip > I think you are correct about the higher temperatures being useful. Unfortunately, most ovens seem to compensate for the higher heat transfer of the oven by reducing the set temperature. > > I think that the convection setting is better for pizza but it really messes up Dutch babies and, I assume, Yorkshire puddings. I had some great Yorkshire pudding in Wales. It was the first time I ever had the stuff and I had to thank the cook, who had great pride in them. As it goes, it seems the folks in the UK like their beef well done nor are they big eaters of grilled steak. > My GE Profile convection automatically reduces heat which seems contrary. I must misunderstand the process, I thought you'd be at same temperature and the fan reduces cook time. That, that was the benefit. Doesn't make sense that it will cook faster if the temp is reduced? -- Michael |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 16:57:32 -0400, mawil1013 > wrote:
>On 10/7/2013 7:36 AM, dsi1 wrote: >snip >> I think you are correct about the higher temperatures being useful. Unfortunately, most ovens seem to compensate for the higher heat transfer of the oven by reducing the set temperature. >> >> I think that the convection setting is better for pizza but it really messes up Dutch babies and, I assume, Yorkshire puddings. I had some great Yorkshire pudding in Wales. It was the first time I ever had the stuff and I had to thank the cook, who had great pride in them. As it goes, it seems the folks in the UK like their beef well done nor are they big eaters of grilled steak. >> >My GE Profile convection automatically reduces heat which seems >contrary. I must misunderstand the process, I thought you'd be at same >temperature and the fan reduces cook time. That, that was the benefit. >Doesn't make sense that it will cook faster if the temp is reduced? Some oven makers say to use the 25 - 25 rule. 25 degrees lower and 25% less time. Never did a side by side comparison do I don't know if that is true. I like higher heat than is usually in the cookbooks, even with convection. also, if what you are cooking is buried deep in a pan, the convection is of little value as the hot air must hit it to cook faster. Sort of like the reverse of the wind chill factor. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, October 6, 2013 10:54:21 PM UTC-7, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 06 Oct 2013 21:40:06 -0700, isw > wrote: > > > > > I've just become the proud user of a double convection oven -- A > > > kitchenAid. > > > > > > Seems to work OK, but the instructions are a bit sparse at best. > > > > > > The user manual suggests that cooking time and temperature can both be > > > cut by using the convection mode, which is fine, but does that mean that > > > I could/should use the convection mode always, for everything? > > > > > > Or are there some things that come out better if *not* cooked using the > > > convection mode? > > > > > > Any suggestions appreciated. > > > > > > > I wouldn't cook a souffle or anything that resembles a souffle (like > > Dutch Babies, Yorkshire pudding or popovers) in a convection oven. > > > > > > -- > > Food is an important part of a balanced diet. Agree- also anything in a water bath... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/13/2013 9:57 PM, mawil1013 wrote:
>> > My GE Profile convection automatically reduces heat which seems > contrary. I must misunderstand the process, I thought you'd be at same > temperature and the fan reduces cook time. That, that was the benefit. > Doesn't make sense that it will cook faster if the temp is reduced? > It seems contrary to me too. When I set an oven temperature, I'd rather not have an oven second guess what temperature I should be using. Changing two variables when using the convection settings tends to make things unclear but I don't roast/bake by time anyway so any time savings are lost to me. I plan on using the convection settings more often so hopefully, I'll get more of a feeling for that in the future. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:21:13 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> Some oven makers say to use the 25 - 25 rule. 25 degrees lower and > 25% less time. Never did a side by side comparison do I don't know if > that is true. I can say it's not true. It's the same amount of time AFAIC. > I like higher heat than is usually in the cookbooks, even with convection. Me too! I gave up on convect a long time ago. It's much ado about nothing. -- Food is an important part of a balanced diet. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing from Electric Oven to Convection Gas oven | General Cooking | |||
Best use of a convection oven? | General Cooking | |||
HELP! Oven Door stuck on Dacor W 305 Convection Oven | Cooking Equipment | |||
HELP! Oven Door stuck on Dacor W 305 Convection Oven | Cooking Equipment | |||
Countertop convection oven vs. Microwave/Convection hood | Cooking Equipment |