On 12/20/2013 9:35 PM, dsi1 wrote:

> Of course, I've mixed pork and beef together. I highly recommend it. No
> veal for me please, the idea of eating the flesh of suckling babies
> makes my flesh crawl.

But eating mom and dad is OK?

They are no longer the suckling babies of old, but they are fed a lot of
milk products. They are formula fed and weigh 500# or so.

On 12/20/2013 5:48 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 9:35 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>> Of course, I've mixed pork and beef together. I highly recommend it. No
>> veal for me please, the idea of eating the flesh of suckling babies
>> makes my flesh crawl.
>
> But eating mom and dad is OK?

Why yes, it is OK to eat mommy and daddy animals but I'm sure that God
forbids eating babies, if it ain't in the bible, it sure outta be.

>
> They are no longer the suckling babies of old, but they are fed a lot of
> milk products. They are formula fed and weigh 500# or so.

On 2013-12-21 2:05 AM, dsi1 wrote:

> Why yes, it is OK to eat mommy and daddy animals but I'm sure that God
> forbids eating babies, if it ain't in the bible, it sure outta be.
>
>>
>> They are no longer the suckling babies of old, but they are fed a lot of
>> milk products. They are formula fed and weigh 500# or so.
>


If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.

On 12/21/2013 4:38 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2013-12-21 2:05 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>> Why yes, it is OK to eat mommy and daddy animals but I'm sure that God
>> forbids eating babies, if it ain't in the bible, it sure outta be.
>>
>>>
>>> They are no longer the suckling babies of old, but they are fed a lot of
>>> milk products. They are formula fed and weigh 500# or so.
>>
>
>
> If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.

Hmmm... this makes little sense on several different levels.

On 12/21/13 12:20 PM, dsi1 wrote:

>> If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.
>
> Hmmm... this makes little sense on several different levels.

Oh? How so?

Veal calves, typically 20-22 weeks old; broiler chickens, usually 9-12
weeks old.

-- Larry

On 2013-12-22 3:19 PM, pltrgyst wrote:
> On 12/21/13 12:20 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>> If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.
>>
>> Hmmm... this makes little sense on several different levels.
>
> Oh? How so?
>
> Veal calves, typically 20-22 weeks old; broiler chickens, usually 9-12
> weeks old.
>

I'm glad someone here understands. I wasn't going to bother explaining it.

On 12/22/2013 10:19 AM, pltrgyst wrote:
> On 12/21/13 12:20 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>>> If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.
>>
>> Hmmm... this makes little sense on several different levels.
>
> Oh? How so?

Ha ha, I got you guys on my list, now. Instead of me 'splaining it to
you, why not figure it out for yourself why the age of an animal or any
living creature has no bearing on maturity. I can lay it out for you
just fine but I'd rather not waste my valuable time.

>
> Veal calves, typically 20-22 weeks old; broiler chickens, usually 9-12
> weeks old.
>
> -- Larry
>

On 2013-12-22 4:03 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 12/22/2013 10:19 AM, pltrgyst wrote:
>> On 12/21/13 12:20 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>
>>>> If you eat chicken or duck it is likely younger than the veal calf.
>>>
>>> Hmmm... this makes little sense on several different levels.
>>
>> Oh? How so?
>
> Ha ha, I got you guys on my list, now. Instead of me 'splaining it to
> you, why not figure it out for yourself why the age of an animal or any
> living creature has no bearing on maturity. I can lay it out for you
> just fine but I'd rather not waste my valuable time.

Sure. Chickens and ducks acquire so much world experience that they are
mature at age 9 weeks. They might be a challenge for some people here.




>
>>
>> Veal calves, typically 20-22 weeks old; broiler chickens, usually 9-12
>> weeks old.

On 12/22/13 4:03 PM, dsi1 wrote:

> Ha ha, I got you guys on my list, now. Instead of me 'splaining it to
> you, why not figure it out for yourself why the age of an animal or any
> living creature has no bearing on maturity. I can lay it out for you
> just fine but I'd rather not waste my valuable time.

We're not talking about the maturity of animals, you dummy. We're
discussing the absurdity of some people's sensibilities regarding eating
tender young animals.

Your time isn't worth squat to me. Nor, I suspect, to anyone else,
including your supervisor on the ditch-digging brigade.

-- Larry