On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
> wrote:

>
> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
>lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
>then turn around and insult me in public.

You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
facebook *******.

On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
>>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
>>> then turn around and insult me in public.
>>
>> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
>> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
>> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
>> facebook *******.
>
> That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
> that?
>
> Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
> facebook.
>


Phone conversation...

Sheldon: Lots of people don't post on rfc anymore
George and Becca: They went over to the new cooking group on FaceBook.
You should join.
Sheldon: I hate Facebook and won't go there.
George and Becca: Oh well.

Sheldon won't go the the Facebook group because he knows the moderators
won't allow his personal attacks there. The ironic part is that Becca is
a moderator there and invited him to join.

The sad part of this is that Becca is one of the few people in this
group who has remained friends with Sheldon in spite of his behavior.
She has been a friend to him both online and in phone conversations and
she is willing to overlook his faults. I am not as accepting as Becca
is. If you want to be my friend in private you can't trash me in public.

Becca's reward for being Sheldon's friend? He calls her a "phony" in
this newsgroup. Knowing Becca, that probably doesn't bother her as much
as it bothered me. Like I said, she is more tolerant of bad behavior
than I am.

I don't give a rat's as what Sheldon thinks of me. I can take it and I
can dish it out with the best of them. But he crossed the line when he
insulted Becca... someone who never did anything wrong to him or posted
anything bad about him.

George L

In article >,
says...
>
> On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >
> >> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
> >>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
> >>> then turn around and insult me in public.
> >>
> >> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
> >> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
> >> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
> >> facebook *******.
> >
> > That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
> > that?
> >
> > Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
> > facebook.
> >
>
>
> Phone conversation...

Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
hypocrisy.


Janet UK

On 06/01/2014 14:11, Janet wrote:

> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
> beneath contempt, George.

One might say the same about looking in Google's archives to try and
discredit someone.

> So enough of the holier gentleman than him
> hypocrisy.

Yes, let's have less of that hypocrisy, Gannet.

On 1/6/2014 8:11 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
>>>>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
>>>>> then turn around and insult me in public.
>>>>
>>>> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
>>>> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
>>>> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
>>>> facebook *******.
>>>
>>> That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
>>> that?
>>>
>>> Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
>>> facebook.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Phone conversation...
>
> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
> hypocrisy.


Tell you what, Janet... when someone calls me on my 800 toll free
business number and I am paying for the phone call, I own the
conversation. When someone insults my wife... I own them and I don't
have to play fair and don't give a damn what people think of my methods.

Where is your contempt when Sheldon posts his insults? You might want
to check your priorities before you get in the middle of a dog fight.

George L

On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:11:42 -0000, Janet > wrote:

> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > > On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
> > >>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
> > >>> then turn around and insult me in public.
> > >>
> > >> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
> > >> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
> > >> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
> > >> facebook *******.
> > >
> > > That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
> > > that?
> > >
> > > Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
> > > facebook.
> > >
> >
> >
> > Phone conversation...
>
> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
> hypocrisy.
>
>
Get off your high horse.

--
"Corporations aren't people, they're Republicans"
(Rev Al Sharpton 10/7/2011)

On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:11:42 -0000, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
>says...
>>
>> On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> > On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
>> >>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
>> >>> then turn around and insult me in public.
>> >>
>> >> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
>> >> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
>> >> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
>> >> facebook *******.
>> >
>> > That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
>> > that?
>> >
>> > Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
>> > facebook.
>> >
>>
>>
>> Phone conversation...
>
> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
>beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
>hypocrisy.
>
>
> Janet UK

TY He's the one who made this personal... a very ignorant person
knowing how much personal info I know about him.

I know Becca a lot longer than this George does, many years before
they met... I'm utterly amazed that she hooked up with such dreck and
subjugates herself to that monster's abuse... and the loser leech is
living in her house while he treats her like chattel.

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:26:10 -0600, George Leppla
> wrote:

> Where is your contempt when Sheldon posts his insults?

She's obviously a Sheldon groupie aka: excuser.

--
"Corporations aren't people, they're Republicans"
(Rev Al Sharpton 10/7/2011)

On 1/6/2014 8:34 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:11:42 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>>
>>> On 1/5/2014 7:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 18:10:26 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 09:20:32 -0600, George Leppla
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're not allowed to call me and Becca on the phone when you are
>>>>>> lonely and sick and worried and looking for a friend to talk with and
>>>>>> then turn around and insult me in public.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're the ones who tried to convince me to be part of facebook... you
>>>>> are BOTH phonies... I haven't called in a long while and I will never
>>>>> call you again. Enjoy the lawnmower I suggested, you disingenuous
>>>>> facebook *******.
>>>>
>>>> That was pretty kooky. What did Facebook have anything to do with
>>>> that?
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like when Sheldon is out of insults and ramblings, he brings up
>>>> facebook.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Phone conversation...
>>
>> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
>> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
>> hypocrisy.
>>
>>
>> Janet UK
>
> TY He's the one who made this personal... a very ignorant person
> knowing how much personal info I know about him.


Rally, Sheldon? You want to go there? You want me to start posting
about your family? You health? Your marital status? Address? Email
addresses? Phone number? Why you are home alone so many weekends? You
better decide real quick if you want to start an online war with me.

I hereby give you permission to post anything you know about me. If you
know so much, go for it. Oh... but I'm not asking your permission for me
to post what I know about you. I'll do that (or not) on my own terms,
not yours and I don't care if you like it or not. You gave up your
right to any consideration from me.


> I know Becca a lot longer than this George does, many years before
> they met... I'm utterly amazed that she hooked up with such dreck and
> subjugates herself to that monster's abuse... and the loser leech is
> living in her house while he treats her like chattel.

1) the house is ours... we bought it together. It is the house that
Becca's ex-husband grew up in as a child and he inherited it when his
step-father died and sold it to us. Lie #1 shot down.

2) Becca sold and closed her business almost 7 years ago and hasn't
worked outside the home since then. She sometimes helps me with this
business... oh and BTW - for accounting reasons, I transferred 100%
ownership of this business to her. Lie #2 shot down.

3) Abuse is what I am going to do to you... only I wouldn't call it
abuse. I'll just shoot down every lie and piece of misinformation you
post and you will feel like it is abuse.

That's it. These other people are willing to put up with you but I am
not. You can back off, shut your mouth and move on... or you can pour
some gasoline on the fire... but if you do, be careful that you aren't
the one getting burned.

The choice is yours.

George L

On 1/6/2014 10:04 AM, Sqwertz wrote:

> I don't think Sheldon would find it hard, either, to act civilly.

Actually, Sheldon participates in another online forum where he posts
regularly and is polite and a good member of that community (ain't that
right, Tractor1?)

From that and his phone conversations with me, I know he is capable of
discussing things like a rational adult, but for some reason he likes to
use rfc as his place where he can be the obnoxious bully. He says it is
his "online persona".

Well, if your online persona is to stab a friend in the back and that
friend is me, you then have a problem.

At minimum, I want to see him post a public apology to Becca... someone
who was always his friend.

No apology to me expected or wanted.... but an apology to Becca will go
a long way to calming me down.

George

In article >,
says...
>
> On 06/01/2014 14:11, Janet wrote:
>
> > Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
> > beneath contempt, George.
>
> One might say the same about looking in Google's archives to try and
> discredit someone.

One would only say that if one was irrational. There's nothing private
or confidential about anything you post Usenet.

Here's you, in your very own words.

https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...ar/xrpmjop_grI


Janet UK

In article >,
says...
>
> On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 08:26:10 -0600, George Leppla
> > wrote:
>
> > Where is your contempt when Sheldon posts his insults?

LOL Sheldon got so tired of being slapped down by me he just lies down
and pretends to be dead.
>
> She's obviously a Sheldon groupie aka: excuser.

No, that's Becca, George's wife.

Janet UK

On 1/6/2014 9:59 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> ObFood: Just started marinating some bulgogi skirt steak for lunch.
>
> -sw

No one cares, buzz off attention-whore...

On 1/6/2014 9:04 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I haven't found it hard to "get along" in RFCoF at all.

So you're not acting like the creepy stalker, fascist jackboot you are
on alt,food-fast-food?

Wow.

On 1/6/2014 9:08 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> The paraphrased conversation wasn't anything that Sheldon didn't
> already tell us, IMO.

Shut up, troll.

On 1/5/2014 6:19 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> But Walmart still get's it's tax
> write-off by "donating" all that grey and green meat.

Prove it.

On 1/5/2014 6:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> That was pretty kooky.

Like your stalking Jerry Sauk and Omelet?

On 1/5/2014 1:10 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I really have to hold my tongue on this. The politics behind this,
> and all those figures people are throwing out there, are enormous and
> I bow out now.
>
> -sw

Cowardly weasel.

DreadfulBitch wrote:
> On 1/4/2014 6:29 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 1/4/2014 2:59 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Michael Kuettner" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Ah, Bovine Julie can snip posts if it suits her.
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Michael Kuettner" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> Your nation wasn't founded on Christian principles.
>>>>>>> Your nation was founded by Calvinistic lunatics who were
>>>>>>> kicked out of Britain because they were slightly right to Cromwell
>>>>>>> and Attila the Hun.
>>>>>>> Slave - owners who invoked Jesus in every sentence; the good old
>>>>>>> USA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't really care who founded it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Who doesn't know history is damned to repeat it...
>>>>>
>>>>> > What matters to me is what we have now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now you have applied Calvinism.
>>>>> Look it up. You've already managed to google "bigot".
>>>>> One word a day ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> And there are a heck of a lot of us who are not Christians.
>>>>>
>>>>> Non sequitur, as usual.
>>>>> Look that one up, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> My point was that the USA wasn't founded on Christian principles.
>>>>> Learn to read AND comprehend.
>>>>
>>>> Again... Don't care.
>>>
>>> You don't care about who founded our country OR don't care about
>>> reading and comprehending?
>>
>> Well seeing as how I am actually related to a founding father, I suppose
>> that I do care *who* they were. But the details of what this country
>> *was* founded on do not matter to me now. That was then, this is now.
>> What they did back then and how they lived their lives has no bearing on
>> how we live our lives now. If you want to go out and kill a squirrel
>> then eat it with some foraged greens, go right ahead. You can also wear
>> a cotton dress that you sewed by hand and look out of your Isinglass
>> window as you sit by your fire. So people choose to live like that. I
>> don't, but that's how it is now. We have choices.
>
> I'm speechless...
>
That's the typical effect of Bovine Julie.
Especially, when she tries to sound intelligent.
Oh, and of course, she is related to a founding father ...

Cheers,

Michal Kuettner

Janet wrote:
>
> > Phone conversation...
>
> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
> hypocrisy.

I agree. I hate when someone posts a private conversation to the
general public. Private should be kept private. This is starting to
sound like the John-Bryan mess that finally ended.

G.

George Leppla wrote:
> On 1/2/2014 5:56 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:49:04 -0600, George Leppla
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> If you are ANY kind of ethical or moral person
>>> at all, you don't quibble about helping the poor. Period.
>>>
>>
>> I most certainly agree. Unfortunately, it seems like the most vocal
>> "Christians" are of the Ted Cruz and Duck Dynasty ilk... bible
>> thumpers without a Christian bone in their bodies.
>>
>
>
> Yep... a hymn on their lips and their hands raised to Heaven praising
> God and Jesus..... while they are willing to let children starve at
> their feet because their parents may not be "needy enough" to suit them.
>
> How many meals does a kid have to miss before they are deemed to be
> "needy enough" to get assistance?
>

That doesn't matter for a Calvinist -> WASP.

Cheers,

Michael Kuettner

On 1/6/2014 2:36 PM, Gary wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>>
>>> Phone conversation...
>>
>> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
>> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
>> hypocrisy.
>
> I agree. I hate when someone posts a private conversation to the
> general public. Private should be kept private. This is starting to
> sound like the John-Bryan mess that finally ended.



I respectfully and politely suggest that anyone who is uncomfortable
with any of my postings please put me in your kill file.

I use Usenet on my terms and I understand if that conflicts with
anyone's personal standards, they are free to block my posts. No hard
feelings at all.

George L

George Leppla wrote:
>
> Rally, Sheldon? You want to go there? You want me to start posting
> about your family? You health? Your marital status? Address? Email
> addresses? Phone number? Why you are home alone so many weekends? You
> better decide real quick if you want to start an online war with me.

Wow. I used to think George was cool. Now I'm seeing a very evil
George. Whatever you and Sheldon have discussed in private should
remain that way. Don't embarrass yourself with your "going public"
threats. You've already lost me as a fan, you ass-monkey. You are
obviously not someone that can be trusted. Unbelievable.

G.

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 11:32:36 -0700, Casa Milagro > wrote:

> On 1/6/2014 9:04 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > I haven't found it hard to "get along" in RFCoF at all.
>
> So you're not acting like the creepy stalker, fascist jackboot you are
> on alt,food-fast-food?
>
> Wow.

He's talking about RFC on Facebook? LOL! I guarantee it's killing
him, but if the little weasel wants to be welcome there - he has to
behave and play nice with others or he'll be thrown out on his ear.

--
"Corporations aren't people, they're Republicans"
(Rev Al Sharpton 10/7/2011)

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:13:23 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>George Leppla wrote:
>>
>> Rally, Sheldon? You want to go there? You want me to start posting
>> about your family? You health? Your marital status? Address? Email
>> addresses? Phone number? Why you are home alone so many weekends? You
>> better decide real quick if you want to start an online war with me.
>
>Wow. I used to think George was cool. Now I'm seeing a very evil
>George. Whatever you and Sheldon have discussed in private should
>remain that way. Don't embarrass yourself with your "going public"
>threats. You've already lost me as a fan, you ass-monkey. You are
>obviously not someone that can be trusted. Unbelievable.

I've never discussed much of anything with George. My relationship
was/is with Becca, we go back nearly 20 years, long before George.
I've never posted anything Becca and I have discussed and and you can
ask her whether I've ever broken her trust for all those years. George
I presume is ****ed because he's angry about my relationship with
Becca... I really don't think he want's to go there, I have a fat
folder of correspondence and pictures.

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:36:54 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>Janet wrote:
>>
>> > Phone conversation...
>>
>> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
>> beneath contempt, George. So enough of the holier gentleman than him
>> hypocrisy.
>
>I agree. I hate when someone posts a private conversation to the
>general public. Private should be kept private. This is starting to
>sound like the John-Bryan mess that finally ended.
>
>G.

Were I to post the private emails and photos between Becca and myself
before Becca even heard of George he couldn't find a deep enough abyss
to hide.

On 06/01/14 17:55, Janet wrote:

> In article >,
> says...

>> On 06/01/2014 14:11, Janet wrote:

>>> Bringing private phone conversations to usenet to discredit him is
>>> beneath contempt, George.

>> One might say the same about looking in Google's archives to try and
>> discredit someone.

> One would only say that if one was irrational. There's nothing private
> or confidential about anything you post Usenet.

Nevertheless, it is a low act and an utterly desperate one.

> Here's you, in your very own words.

> https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...ar/xrpmjop_grI

That was some of my best handiwork on that group, the culmination of a
long, drawn-out wind up I did. I was amazed at the time that some
people were stupid enough to take it seriously. Obviously, they weren't
the only ones.

You're not the only one on this group who has Googled my history on
alt.guitar. I'm obviously making a deep impression on one or two of you.

"Michael Kuettner" > wrote in message
...

> That's the typical effect of Bovine Julie.
> Especially, when she tries to sound intelligent.
> Oh, and of course, she is related to a founding father ...

Chances are a lot of us (in this country) are related to one. I'm also
related to Johnny Appleseed, John Wilkes Booth and perhaps even Pocahontas
although the person who was claiming this didn't provide what our family
considered to be good proof.

They did a lot of things in the old days that have no bearing on our lives
now. There were reasons for some of those things. The world was different
then.

On 1/6/2014 4:30 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Stop
> trying to stand up for Sheldon's consistently Bad Behavior. Or else
> we'll send you back to alt.cooking-chat where you came from!
>
> -sw

Bugger off, troll.

On 1/6/2014 4:45 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> It ****es Barbara Llorente off to no end to see that I get along so
> easily over there. I enjoy that.


A troll and attention whoring dwarf like you would though...

On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:44:11 -0700, Casa Milagro > wrote:

> On 1/6/2014 4:45 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > It ****es Barbara Llorente off to no end to see that I get along so
> > easily over there. I enjoy that.
>
>
> A troll and attention whoring dwarf like you would though...

He doesn't get along "easily". He "gets along" because he HAS to or
else he's out and that pleases me to no end. LOLOL

He kisses ass all day long over there.

--
"Corporations aren't people, they're Republicans"
(Rev Al Sharpton 10/7/2011)

In article >,
says...

> He kisses ass all day long over there.

No wonder you're so happy

Janet UK

On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:00:17 -0000, Janet > wrote:

> In article >,
> says...
>
> > He kisses ass all day long over there.
>
> No wonder you're so happy
>
Yep.

--
"Corporations aren't people, they're Republicans"
(Rev Al Sharpton 10/7/2011)

On 1/6/2014 3:59 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> I've never discussed much of anything with George. My relationship
> was/is with Becca, we go back nearly 20 years, long before George.
> I've never posted anything Becca and I have discussed and and you can
> ask her whether I've ever broken her trust for all those years. George
> I presume is ****ed because he's angry about my relationship with
> Becca... I really don't think he want's to go there, I have a fat
> folder of correspondence and pictures.


Translation from SHeldonese into English: "I can't win an online
argument with George so I'll threaten to embarrass Becca instead!"

You are a piece of work, You claim you have never broken her trust and
in the same paragraph and in another post, you threaten her. I guess
that is your idea of keeping it classy.

Funny how you never really deal face to face with me... always
deflecting somewhere else. Is that yellow streak down your back
jaundice... or cowardice?

George L

On 1/7/2014 12:39 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:44:43 -0800, sf wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:44:11 -0700, Casa Milagro > wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/6/2014 4:45 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> It ****es Barbara Llorente off to no end to see that I get along so
>>>> easily over there. I enjoy that.
>>>
>>> A troll and attention whoring dwarf like you would though...
>>
>> He doesn't get along "easily". He "gets along" because he HAS to or
>> else he's out and that pleases me to no end. LOLOL
>>
>> He kisses ass all day long over there.
>
> Yesterday she accused Jebus and Bryan of jacking each other off. Look
> at Barbara and Casa going at it, each with their own unique brand of
> ironic hypocrisy.
>
> Two circle jerking psychos - a match made in heaven, those two.
>
> -sw
>
Why do your torment Jerry Sauk in aff-f?

Why did you chase poor Omelet off the net?

On 1/6/2014 4:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> And you'd probably be best not to consider her a
> friend anymore either.

Who appointed you group social director, dwarf?

On 1/6/2014 4:34 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> You; are totally off your meds, aren't you Pussy Katz?

Says the troll who stalks Jerrry Sauk in aff-f...

On 1/6/2014 1:04 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Ahh. The Beauty, Make-up, and Skin Care Forum:

Hang there much, troll?

On 1/7/2014 7:41 AM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 13:00:17 -0000, Janet > wrote:
>
>> In article >,
>> says...
>>
>>> He kisses ass all day long over there.
>>
>> No wonder you're so happy
>>
> Yep.
>
Word.

On 1/6/2014 10:44 PM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 20:44:11 -0700, Casa Milagro > wrote:
>
>> On 1/6/2014 4:45 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> It ****es Barbara Llorente off to no end to see that I get along so
>>> easily over there. I enjoy that.
>>
>>
>> A troll and attention whoring dwarf like you would though...
>
> He doesn't get along "easily". He "gets along" because he HAS to or
> else he's out and that pleases me to no end. LOLOL

That covers it, yes.

> He kisses ass all day long over there.

Dwarf servile love...