On Thursday, April 24, 2014 10:32:48 PM UTC-4, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
>
> > "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>
> >>
>
> >> Theree is nothing wrong with MY news reader. There is everything wrong
>
> >> with
>
> >> THEIR non-RFC compliant newsreader.
>
> >
>
> > A non-RFC compliant newsreader? LMAO.
>
> > You use Outlook Express. It sucks. Lose it and get a good newsreader.
>
> >
>
>
>
> It works just fine.

No it doesn't half-wit. We've been telling you that for years.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 4/24/2014 6:06 PM, Gary wrote:
>> "Paul M. Cook" wrote:
>>>
>>> Theree is nothing wrong with MY news reader. There is everything wrong
>>> with
>>> THEIR non-RFC compliant newsreader.
>>
>> A non-RFC compliant newsreader? LMAO.
>> You use Outlook Express. It sucks. Lose it and get a good newsreader.
>>
>> G.
>>
> Actually OE with Quotefix wasn't bad. The later versions of Windows mail
> truly sucked for newsgroups and the folks who wrote Quotefix weren't
> inclined to rewrite the app for the subsequent iterations of Windows mail.
>
> The real problem is Paul insisting we all must think this "waffle
> sandwich" is fantasmagorical. It's really not.
>

Your best orgasm days are long gone. What's on the menu at Dataw today?
Gosh those are just so entertaining.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>I have had a Monte Christo, thanks, and this is not it. An MC doesn't have
>a waffle as part of it. And a side of jelly
> isn't jelly slopped all over it.

Merely a style of consuming the jelly. There is also the spoonful from the
jar into the mouth method. The plate lacked a paper doily, too.




---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

>> Your best orgasm days are long gone. What's on the menu at Dataw
>> today? Gosh those are just so entertaining.
>
> Compared to your posts which mostly consist of childish foot stomping
> and "I meant to do that" pretensions? LOL...

Actually today... well, similar to a Monte Cristo? Not quite.

Mademoiselle Sandwich
Turkey and Swiss Cheese with
House Herbs, Lettuce and Tomato on
Pumpernickle with Honey Dijonnaise
Choice of Side
$9.00

So there

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>>> Your best orgasm days are long gone. What's on the menu at Dataw
>>> today? Gosh those are just so entertaining.
>>
>> Compared to your posts which mostly consist of childish foot stomping
>> and "I meant to do that" pretensions? LOL...
>
> Actually today... well, similar to a Monte Cristo? Not quite.
>
> Mademoiselle Sandwich
> Turkey and Swiss Cheese with
> House Herbs, Lettuce and Tomato on
> Pumpernickle with Honey Dijonnaise
> Choice of Side
> $9.00
>
> So there


Not even close. It's a club sandwich. And I bet it would be awesome on a
waffle.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On Friday, April 25, 2014 5:05:02 AM UTC-10, jmcquown wrote:
> On 4/24/2014 9:08 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
> > I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy
>
> > her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe
>
> > I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out.
>
> > Boy, I really like waffles...
>
>
>
> I have a circa 1950's waffle iron I'd be glad to sell you. But
>
> please, don't use it to make a Monte Cristo Sandwich!
>
>

I must refuse the sale of this appliance because I cannot give full assurances that no Monte Cristoing of waffles will occur. I would be interested in any 50s Eggo Waffles that you might have in stock. Thank you for your help.

>
> Jill

dsi1 wrote:
>
> On 4/24/2014 5:18 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> >
> > Betty Crocker's recipe from the 50s calls for egg whites. You cannot make a
> > good waffle any other way.
> >
> >
> The people in the 50s thought TV dinners and Jello salad were good ideas
> too. The 50s sucked.

Good music then though. :-D

On Friday, April 25, 2014 5:10:32 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-04-24 9:08 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>
>
>
> > I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy
>
> > her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe
>
> > I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out..
>
> > Boy, I really like waffles...
>
>
>
>
>
> Eggo Waffles may be one of the reasons that people think waffles aren't
>
> worth making.

Eggo Waffles is just alright with me. It's a lot better than no waffles.

>
>
>
> I didn't know that Sweden is famous for waffles, but I have heard about
>
> Swedish pancakes.

I don't know if Sweden is famous for waffles although there was that spiffy waffle iron that you heated on the stove that had a built-in temperature gauge. That had a viking on it. March 24th was Våffeldagen in Sweden which is supposed to be some kind of day for celebrating the waffle so I guess some Swedes dig the stuff.

On Monday, April 21, 2014 4:19:43 PM UTC-4, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> http://www.foodiecrush.com/2013/09/m...ffle-sandwich/
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
>
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
>
> http://www.avast.com

I finally decided to look at the original post that started this thread. Jesus, Paulie, that's not even close to a Monte Cristo. What is wrong with you?!? And take that spam off your sig, you mongoloid. I know you haven't been able to learn to use Outlook properly, but we'll help...if that's really what you need. Snicker!

On 4/25/2014 6:54 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 17:21:29 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> Dinner Special tonight at the Club:
>>
>> Soft Shelled Crab
>> Topped with a Lemon Butter Sauce
>> Served over a Wild Rice
>> and Vegetable Du Jour
>> Tapas $12.00/Entrée $24.00
>
> Oh. My. Gawd! I am sooooo droooooling right now!
>
> -sw
>
Me too. LOL Served over *a* wild rice. Heheh.

I might actually like this dish because I do love crab. 'tis the season
for them to moult/shed their shells.

Jill

I don't know how much of the USA puts ham and jelly together...I have certainly never seen it either from
a home cook or in a restaurant (and that includes as a "side" for a Monte Christo). The only meat and jelly I
have ever seen together is
lamb and mint jelly, which is quite tasty. I don't know if that is served any more, nor even how it started.

N.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:52:07 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> It's not a "plug-in" dumbass. OE has no facility for plug-ins as do Web
>> browsers. It's what programmers call a "shell" and exploits dynamic
>> linking
>> with embedded objects to do what it does.
>
> That's not called a shell. Shell's are basic function of the OS, not
> extensions to compiled, hardcoded applications. For all intents and
> purposes, the programs works as a plug-in. If anything, it's a
> wrapper from a programming standpoint.

A plug in has no dedicated API. We are not dealing with a specific API here
but with the ability to dynamically link objects at run time regard OE. A
plug in requires a separate utility called a plug in manager where the plug
in issues API calls to the manager which then passes to the specific object.
It is pure Microsoft and unique to their way of doing things.

>> You can read up on it in a programming manual for Windows - see DLL. Also
>> look up "helper object."
>
> Quotefix is an EXE, not a DLL (oops!). And if you look up the
> definition of DLL (as you suggest) you will find it described as a
> PLUG-IN.
>

That is completely irrelevant. Any compiled EXE can link to any DLL as long
as you use the object embedder and compiler that comes with the MSDE. That
is what the D stands for - dynamic. With DLLs objects are linked at run
time, not at compile time. As opposed to the way the rest of the world does
it and that is to hard link objects and libraries after compilation which
forms the object file which the link/loader converts to an executable
object.

In article >,
says...

> TV dinners were a novelty. They weren't great, but they were better than
> some people could do on their own.

In the 50's /60's The (dried) Vesta Curry ready-made dinner was many
Brits first introduction to Indian food. A Vesta Curry was the first
time my hardworked mother had ever encountered either, a ready-made meal
or a curry; so she brought one home. I can still remember how exotic and
utterly delicious it tasted :-) Nothing like as good as real food in
India, or food in Indian restaurants in the UK ,but we didn't know that
then.

Janet UK

On 4/26/2014 10:13 AM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:38:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual
>>> components are probably tasty,
>>> but together, they're a mess.
>>
>> You could be metabolically challenged as we say. Seriously, you never heard
>> of a montechristo sandwich? That is what I got out of this thread is most
>> people simply never have heard of them. It's really a great sandwich -
>> easily my all time favorite next to the BLT. Smked ham, eggs, melted
>> cheese, turkey with a side of jelly - what's not to like?
>
> Most certainly the jelly.

To each his own, of course, but I don't want jelly on my
turkey/ham/cheese sandwich. I am not a huge fan of cranberry
sauce on turkey sandwiches, either, it's just not for me.

I guess the waffle is okay if it's not sweet at all. I assume
that if it's a frozen waffle, it is, but it might just be my
head picturing waffles=sweet. I really love a good waffle, but
not feeling it as a sandwich bread.

nancy

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:38:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>>I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual
>>components are probably tasty,
>> but together, they're a mess.
>
>You could be metabolically challenged as we say. Seriously, you never heard
>of a montechristo sandwich? That is what I got out of this thread is most
>people simply never have heard of them. It's really a great sandwich -
>easily my all time favorite next to the BLT. Smked ham, eggs, melted
>cheese, turkey with a side of jelly - what's not to like?

Most certainly the jelly.

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:41:42 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>Ham and jam are like peas and carrots. They
>really work together.

Not if you're not USAian they don't.

jmcquown wrote:
>
> The real problem is Paul insisting we all must think this "waffle
> sandwich" is fantasmagorical. It's really not.

I've refrained comments on this so far, but you can put in my vote. I
would imagine that the waffle sandwich thing is probably tasty in real
life. Not surprised at all the bad comments here. It's the RFC way.

I've had sausage biscuits with grape jam before so the idea of jam
with ham is not a bad thing. I will probably never make that waffle
thing but I would certainly eat it if someone made it for me. I'll bet
it tastes very good. Kind of a sweet/savory thing.

:-D

Nancy2 wrote:

>I don't know how much of the USA puts ham and jelly together...I have certainly never seen it
>either from a home cook or in a restaurant. The only meat and jelly I have ever seen together is
>lamb and mint jelly, which is quite tasty.

In the US ham is often served with a glaze of some sort of jelly/jam;
jellied cranberry sauce is common, as is orange marmalade, pineapple
jam, apricot jam, etc. I like a ham sandwich with duck sauce and
chinese mustard. I detest mint jelly, I detest mint in any form,
especially mint toothpaste.

If you say so, Shel, but I have never had/seen ham with any kind of jelly glaze or just jelly. The closest I
have seen is ham with a cherry sauce (not based on jam or jelly) or raisin sauce.

I do admit that I had forgotten about turkey and cranberry sauce, but again, that isn't jelly, nor is it usually based on jelly,
at least in my world.

N.

I should perhaps clarify that I am speaking of meat and jam or jelly combos, which I am not familiar with,
and meat and FRUIT combos, which are certainly popular and experienced often. I put ham and pineapple
or cherries or raisins and pork with apples or chicken with lemon or Mandarin oranges in the meat and fruit
category.

N.

On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:42:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

>I don't know how much of the USA puts ham and jelly together...I have certainly never seen it either from
> a home cook or in a restaurant (and that includes as a "side" for a Monte Christo). The only meat and jelly I
>have ever seen together is
>lamb and mint jelly, which is quite tasty. I don't know if that is served any more, nor even how it started.

Lamb and mint sauce or jelly is certainly still popular here in Aus
and elsewhere. I'm not real keen on mint jellies - but then all the
ones I have tried were bought and not home made. Too much sugar for my
tastes... but yes, mint and lamb is wonderful.

On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 09:45:01 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 4/26/2014 10:13 AM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 19:38:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> I must be dead because to me, it looks creepily disgusting. The individual
>>>> components are probably tasty,
>>>> but together, they're a mess.
>>>
>>> You could be metabolically challenged as we say. Seriously, you never heard
>>> of a montechristo sandwich? That is what I got out of this thread is most
>>> people simply never have heard of them. It's really a great sandwich -
>>> easily my all time favorite next to the BLT. Smked ham, eggs, melted
>>> cheese, turkey with a side of jelly - what's not to like?
>>
>> Most certainly the jelly.
>
>To each his own, of course, but I don't want jelly on my
>turkey/ham/cheese sandwich. I am not a huge fan of cranberry
>sauce on turkey sandwiches, either, it's just not for me.

I find them to be too sweet, generally speaking.

On 2014-04-26 22:07, Jeßus wrote:

>> To each his own, of course, but I don't want jelly on my
>> turkey/ham/cheese sandwich. I am not a huge fan of cranberry
>> sauce on turkey sandwiches, either, it's just not for me.
>
> I find them to be too sweet, generally speaking.
>

I like cranberry sauce on turkey sandwiches, but I make my own cranberry
sauce and it is a little tangier than the canned stuff.

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:16:56 +1000, John J > wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:06:23 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:42:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:
>>
>>>I don't know how much of the USA puts ham and jelly together...I have certainly never seen it either from
>>> a home cook or in a restaurant (and that includes as a "side" for a Monte Christo). The only meat and jelly I
>>>have ever seen together is
>>>lamb and mint jelly, which is quite tasty. I don't know if that is served any more, nor even how it started.
>>
>>Lamb and mint sauce or jelly is certainly still popular here in Aus
>>and elsewhere. I'm not real keen on mint jellies - but then all the
>>ones I have tried were bought and not home made. Too much sugar for my
>>tastes... but yes, mint and lamb is wonderful.
>
>The English kill their lamb twice. Once when they slaughter it and
>once when they prepare it. (French saying)

Shaddup, you.

Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.

On Sat, 26 Apr 2014 22:14:12 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2014-04-26 22:07, Jeßus wrote:
>
>>> To each his own, of course, but I don't want jelly on my
>>> turkey/ham/cheese sandwich. I am not a huge fan of cranberry
>>> sauce on turkey sandwiches, either, it's just not for me.
>>
>> I find them to be too sweet, generally speaking.
>>
>
>I like cranberry sauce on turkey sandwiches, but I make my own cranberry
>sauce and it is a little tangier than the canned stuff.

Sounds nice.

On 4/26/2014 10:14 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-04-26 22:07, Jeßus wrote:
>
>>> To each his own, of course, but I don't want jelly on my
>>> turkey/ham/cheese sandwich. I am not a huge fan of cranberry
>>> sauce on turkey sandwiches, either, it's just not for me.
>>
>> I find them to be too sweet, generally speaking.
>>
>
> I like cranberry sauce on turkey sandwiches, but I make my own cranberry
> sauce and it is a little tangier than the canned stuff.

Like asparagus, I grew up with canned and ... I know it's a
sentimental favorite for a lot of people ... but I never
liked it. Not the can ring kind or the chunky. Of course
I make it fresh now. Still don't want it on my sandwich.

Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
raspberry jam on it.

nancy

On 4/27/2014 3:38 AM, Jeßus wrote:

> Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
> mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.
>
Venison spag bol is good, too.

"S Viemeister" > wrote in message
...
> On 4/27/2014 3:38 AM, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
>> mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.
>>
> Venison spag bol is good, too.

A made a version yesterday using my meatloaf/meatballs* chopped up. I also
added some mushrooms and it was delicious

* A mix of beef, pork and bacon.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Ophelia wrote:
>
> "S Viemeister" wrote:
> > Venison spag bol is good, too.
>
> A made a version yesterday using my meatloaf/meatballs* chopped up. I also
> added some mushrooms and it was delicious
>
> * A mix of beef, pork and bacon.

hmmm. bacon sounds like a nice touch to meatloaf/meatballs.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> "S Viemeister" wrote:
>> > Venison spag bol is good, too.
>>
>> A made a version yesterday using my meatloaf/meatballs* chopped up. I
>> also
>> added some mushrooms and it was delicious
>>
>> * A mix of beef, pork and bacon.
>
> hmmm. bacon sounds like a nice touch to meatloaf/meatballs.

It is I use (mostly) equal portions of each! I roll them and bake them
as meatballs because I like them browned all around, which I don't get when
I bake it as a loaf.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 08:48:36 -0400, S Viemeister
> wrote:

>On 4/27/2014 3:38 AM, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
>> mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.
>>
>Venison spag bol is good, too.

That does sound interesting, I can't quite imagine the combination of
flavours there... would be very dependant on whether it is wild or
farmed deer too. I know it wouldn't be bad in any way though.

And I have a side of venison coming my way ONE day... my friend farms
deer, but is one of these guys you have to keep nagging to do
something he agreed to do 3 weeks ago...

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 18:17:23 +1000, John J > wrote:

>On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:38:42 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 17:16:56 +1000, John J > wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 12:06:23 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:42:11 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I don't know how much of the USA puts ham and jelly together...I have certainly never seen it either from
>>>>> a home cook or in a restaurant (and that includes as a "side" for a Monte Christo). The only meat and jelly I
>>>>>have ever seen together is
>>>>>lamb and mint jelly, which is quite tasty. I don't know if that is served any more, nor even how it started.
>>>>
>>>>Lamb and mint sauce or jelly is certainly still popular here in Aus
>>>>and elsewhere. I'm not real keen on mint jellies - but then all the
>>>>ones I have tried were bought and not home made. Too much sugar for my
>>>>tastes... but yes, mint and lamb is wonderful.
>>>
>>>The English kill their lamb twice. Once when they slaughter it and
>>>once when they prepare it. (French saying)
>>
>>Shaddup, you.
>>
>>Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
>>mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.
>
>I don't doubt that, but I think the French comment mainly refers to
>mint sauce.

Indeed. I was just mentioning what I was having last night - the fact
that it was lamb was entirely coincidental.

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 14:35:41 +0100, "Ophelia"
> wrote:

>"S Viemeister" > wrote in message
...
>> On 4/27/2014 3:38 AM, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>>> Slow cooked (highly caramelised) Spag Bol tonight here, using lamb
>>> mince. Lamb mince makes the best Spag Bol and Lasagna.
>>>
>> Venison spag bol is good, too.
>
>A made a version yesterday using my meatloaf/meatballs* chopped up. I also
>added some mushrooms and it was delicious
>
>* A mix of beef, pork and bacon.

Yum yum.

On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:08:23 -1000, dsi1
> wrote:

>On 4/24/2014 12:39 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 16:54:17 -1000, dsi1
>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm guessing that Sweden would be the best place to find a waffle. I bet
>>> they make better ones than we do.
>>
>> Quite possibly...
>>
>
>I'll have to ask my Swedish step-mom about waffles. Maybe I'll just buy
>her a box of Eggo Waffles. She'll probably give me a dour look. Maybe
>I'll give her a waffle iron for her birthday and tell her to try it out.
>Boy, I really like waffles...

I can tell!

On 4/27/2014 6:16 AM, Nancy Young wrote:

> Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
> raspberry jam on it.

I'm with you Nancy. I generally don't like sweet and savory in the same
dish, especially if it's fruit.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:49:00 -0400, Cheryl >
wrote:

>On 4/27/2014 6:16 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
>
>> Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
>> raspberry jam on it.
>
>I'm with you Nancy. I generally don't like sweet and savory in the same
>dish, especially if it's fruit.

I don't mind some fruit with certain meats, such as pork and apples or
venison and quince.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:49:00 -0400, Cheryl >
> wrote:
>
>>On 4/27/2014 6:16 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
>>
>>> Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
>>> raspberry jam on it.
>>
>>I'm with you Nancy. I generally don't like sweet and savory in the same
>>dish, especially if it's fruit.
>
> I don't mind some fruit with certain meats, such as pork and apples or
> venison and quince.

One must have apples with pork ... it's the law!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"John J" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:39:39 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:49:00 -0400, Cheryl >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 4/27/2014 6:16 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
>>>>> raspberry jam on it.
>>>>
>>>>I'm with you Nancy. I generally don't like sweet and savory in the same
>>>>dish, especially if it's fruit.
>>>
>>> I don't mind some fruit with certain meats, such as pork and apples or
>>> venison and quince.
>>
>>One must have apples with pork ... it's the law!
>
> Commonwealth law.

My law ;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"John J" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:23:30 +0100, "Ophelia"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"John J" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2014 07:39:39 +0100, "Ophelia"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Sun, 27 Apr 2014 22:49:00 -0400, Cheryl >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 4/27/2014 6:16 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fruit/meat is generally not my thing. Sure as hell don't want
>>>>>>> raspberry jam on it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'm with you Nancy. I generally don't like sweet and savory in the
>>>>>>same
>>>>>>dish, especially if it's fruit.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't mind some fruit with certain meats, such as pork and apples or
>>>>> venison and quince.
>>>>
>>>>One must have apples with pork ... it's the law!
>>>
>>> Commonwealth law.
>>
>>My law ;-)
>
> Ok

;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/