On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>
>>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
>>> they've never even tried.
>>>
>>
>> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
>> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
>> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
>> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
>
> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.


That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.

On 5/14/2014 4:41 PM, sf wrote:
>
> Her too. If she can't eat it for whatever unnamed reason, she should
> skip posting to the thread. She's not alone though. I see people say
> they have an aversion to certain foods as if they their insides were
> intact (or worked properly), when in fact they aren't.
>
> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
> you can't eat whatever it is.
>
>
Huh? There's very little I can't eat. I avoid seeds, that's about it.

I try not to post a laundry list of things I don't like. For example,
if someone mentions they had a salad for (or with) dinner, hey, go for
it. It doesn't affect me one way or the other.

Jill

On 5/14/2014 6:26 PM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/14/2014 1:44 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 5/13/2014 5:35 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I was rather excited about the new pears that I
>>>>>> bought. Apparently nobody else here was.
>>>>>
>>>>> How were they?
>>>>>
>>>> They're still a little too hard for my liking but with this hot weather
>>>> and them being at room temp., hopefully I can report on them in a day
>>>> or two. If anyone cares. Seems that they don't care about my food
>>>> except to pick what I do to shreds.
>>>
>>> I'd like to know how the pears are when you eat them.
>>>
>> *sigh* Still hard. I'll let you know. I threw the bag out but I think
>> Angela said they were labeled "Personal pears".
>
> Sorry to hear you threw them out, they might have been good poached.
> It wouldn't have hurt to experiment.
>
>
She said she threw out the bag, not the pears.

Jill

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
>>>> they've never even tried.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
>>> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
>>> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
>>> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
>>
>> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
>> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
>> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
>> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
>> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>
>
> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.

It's not meant to be specific, it's just an example of those kinds of posts,
and I have seen Bryan do it to several people, and I've seen Brooklyn do it
too. If you want word for word, you'll have to Google, not me.

Cheri

On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:22:05 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 5/14/2014 6:26 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> On 5/14/2014 1:44 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> On 5/13/2014 5:35 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I was rather excited about the new pears that I
> >>>>>> bought. Apparently nobody else here was.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> How were they?
> >>>>>
> >>>> They're still a little too hard for my liking but with this hot weather
> >>>> and them being at room temp., hopefully I can report on them in a day
> >>>> or two. If anyone cares. Seems that they don't care about my food
> >>>> except to pick what I do to shreds.
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to know how the pears are when you eat them.
> >>>
> >> *sigh* Still hard. I'll let you know. I threw the bag out but I think
> >> Angela said they were labeled "Personal pears".
> >
> > Sorry to hear you threw them out, they might have been good poached.
> > It wouldn't have hurt to experiment.
> >
> >
> She said she threw out the bag, not the pears.
>
Ooops. I misinterpreted what she said.


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.

On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:03:31 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

> and if you don't do it that
> way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.

Much more condemning phrases than "you're ignorant". When I see posts
like that, I just think to myself "it's no wonder rfc is dying". Who
wants to stick around after they get blasted like that?


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.

On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:07:26 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >
> > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
> >>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
> >>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
> >>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
> >>> they've never even tried.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
> >> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
> >> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
> >> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
> >
> > Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
> > bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
> > garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
> > and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
> > that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>
>
> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.

You probably have them in your kill file. Bryan and Sheldon are two I
can think of off the top of my head.


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.

On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:15:26 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 5/14/2014 4:41 PM, sf wrote:
> >
> > Her too. If she can't eat it for whatever unnamed reason, she should
> > skip posting to the thread. She's not alone though. I see people say
> > they have an aversion to certain foods as if they their insides were
> > intact (or worked properly), when in fact they aren't.
> >
> > Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
> > that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
> > because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
> > you can't eat whatever it is.
> >
> >
> Huh? There's very little I can't eat. I avoid seeds, that's about it.
>
> I try not to post a laundry list of things I don't like. For example,
> if someone mentions they had a salad for (or with) dinner, hey, go for
> it. It doesn't affect me one way or the other.
>

I just wanted to exclude you in particular because every time I don't,
I get into trouble with you.


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:03:31 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>> and if you don't do it that
>> way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>
> Much more condemning phrases than "you're ignorant". When I see posts
> like that, I just think to myself "it's no wonder rfc is dying". Who
> wants to stick around after they get blasted like that?

Yes, there are much worse condemnations, and it does get tiresome.

Cheri

On 5/14/2014 7:41 PM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:15:26 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 5/14/2014 4:41 PM, sf wrote:
>>>
>>> Her too. If she can't eat it for whatever unnamed reason, she should
>>> skip posting to the thread. She's not alone though. I see people say
>>> they have an aversion to certain foods as if they their insides were
>>> intact (or worked properly), when in fact they aren't.
>>>
>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>
>>>
>> Huh? There's very little I can't eat. I avoid seeds, that's about it.
>>
>> I try not to post a laundry list of things I don't like. For example,
>> if someone mentions they had a salad for (or with) dinner, hey, go for
>> it. It doesn't affect me one way or the other.
>>
>
> I just wanted to exclude you in particular because every time I don't,
> I get into trouble with you.
>
>
You do? I didn't realize you get into trouble with me. We disagree at
times, certainly. That's life. We don't call each other names or
anything like that. We're just talking, mostly about cooking. What
have I done that would make you think you're getting into trouble with
me? Serious question.

Jill

On Wed, 14 May 2014 18:26:43 -0400, Doris Night
> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:02:26 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Doris Night" > wrote in message
>>news
>
>>> Julie, why can't you refer to your family as "my daughter" and "my
>>> husband"? Why is it always "this person" or "one of the other people
>>> in this house" or somesuch?
>>>
>>> Doris
>>
>>Because as you can well see... Every time I do, someone pokes fun at them
>>or picks at me for over sharing.
>
>That's a bit silly - everyone knows who you are talking about. It just
>seems quite rude to me. It sounds like you feel they are nothing
>better than minor annoyances. If my husband was in the habit of
>referring to me as "the other person who lives here" I'd be extremely
>hurt.

As rednecked as those imbeciles who refer to "the wife"... as though
it were lower than "the dog".

On 2014-05-14 7:39 PM, sf wrote:

>
>>> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
>>> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
>>> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
>>> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
>>> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>>
>>
>> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.
>
> You probably have them in your kill file. Bryan and Sheldon are two I
> can think of off the top of my head.


I was going to say that if they were in my KF I would not see them, but
then I remembered someone who was in my KF but who was being quoted in
close to 50% of the posts here. Sheldon is not in my KF.

"Cheri" > wrote in
:
>
>
> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/13/2014 11:54 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>>
>> <filth snipped>
>>
>>>> I am officially done reading your filth since you seem out of
>>>> control at the moment. Meds are the answer.
>>>
>>> I agree with you there. At this point, he is akin to the ABC Dr.
>>> This makes me feel bad. Not for me. But for him. I have a strong
>>> feeling that he won't take the meds or even put himself in a
>>> position to get the meds. And that is really all I will say about it
>>> at the moment. *sniff*
>>
>> Why can't you snip out his "filth" before responding?
>
> I wanted to give you something to do.
>
I thought that the "filth" was funny. I still do. It was all based on
previous posts. I did overemphasize the anal intercourse aspect, and for
that, I apologize, but not to Julie, and sure as Hell not to Kuthe.
>
> Cheri
>
>



--
--Bryan

"Happy ****ing 'new years' that was when me and my father
had to identify her dead mud covered body they pulled from
the family car she'd driven into the Mississippi river!"
--John Kuthe in rec.food.cooking, 3-7-2014

On 5/13/2014 10:43 PM, Winters_Lackey wrote:

>>
> I have an idea.

The more you try to demean others, the more you demean yourself.

Costco offers crap that real people would not touch. What is a Tri Trip?

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> Well that's true enough. But even if I knew you personally I'd avoid you
>> like the plague if I had to listen to all the personal stuff. Keep it
>> under your hat, as they say. It's about cooking. Not about what your
>> family hates. The next time somebody posts a recipe, try not writing "my
>> family would never eat that." That would be a good start.
>
> In case you haven't noticed and obviously you haven't... I do not respond
> to every post in here. If I see a recipe for say...shrimp or lamb, I'm
> not going to respond as I have no interest in those things. I most
> assuredly don't go into every post with a recipe and say that my family
> won't eat that.

OK, so there is a phantom poster using your name? OK, whatever.

> Everyone here has just sooo many suggestions! Well here's one for you.
> Don't like my posts? Don't read them!

I generally don't.

On 5/14/2014 6:35 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

> I trust that you realize that Bob Newhart is a fictional character.

Does Bob Newhart know this??

nancy

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:05:24 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Tue, 13 May 2014 23:53:39 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> > Well, I went to Costco. The cap is sirloin and they were out of
>> >> > everything. The butcher told me they're tough. He said the choice
>> >> > is
>> >> > basically stew meat and the prime is a little better.
>> >>
>> >> Ah... So what I bought was tough. So... I bought a low end, tough
>> >> meat
>> >> and cooked it ahead of time. Wrong thing to do apparently.
>> >
>> > Would he eat soup or stew? You could remediate it that way.
>>
>> He is eating it as I type and it is fine. He *likes* it. It is all the
>> flack I am getting from people here that is ****ing me off. My husband
>> is
>> eating steak! Is that oversharing? Sheesh. Sorry sf. Not going off on
>> you. It is some of the others here who are sticking in my craw.
>
> NP. I'm glad to hear he likes it! Seriously.

Angela ate it too in case anyone cares. She even asked for it!

"Janet Wilder" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> On 5/14/2014 5:08 AM, wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 May 2014 17:43:52 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Janet Wilder" > wrote in message
>>> eb.com...
>>>> On 5/13/2014 4:57 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> That's spouse abuse!
>>>>>
>>>>> He actually prefers the steak that way and daughter doesn't mind
>>>>> either.
>>>>> So... I do what they want.
>>>>
>>>> Sweetie,
>>>>
>>>> Don't you think that jumping to his and her wants is, somehow, not
>>>> right?
>>>
>>> I'm not your sweetie and I certainly do not jump to his every want. I
>>> wouldn't do that for anyone!
>>
>> Janet that will always be the response to your kind post, until she
>> finally decides to get away from it.
>>
> Sadly, she may never admit to it and will remain abused.

You have issues. Really.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 6:14 PM, Janet Wilder wrote:
>
>>> Janet that will always be the response to your kind post, until she
>>> finally decides to get away from it.
>>>
>> Sadly, she may never admit to it and will remain abused.
>
> You have only her word for her situation and I think it is pretty clear
> that Julie has zero credibility. She is just a crackpot looking for people
> to blame for her miserable existence. From what I have gathered her, she
> has put up with a lot more abuse from her daughter than from her husband.
> I think we should save our pity for the husband and daughter.

Dave, you are such a liar! My daughter is not abusive at all. You are
taking one comment that I made in response to someone else when she was
like...what...12? This is truly pathetic.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 6:18 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>>> The wife was a piece of work... fat, ugly and just plain nasty. She
>>> would regularly cook up a box of Krap Dinner for her husband and
>>> daughters and then she would go next door to the restaurant and have
>>> dinner there.
>>
>> I had thoughts in my mind of Bob Newhart when I thought of counselors.
>> Well, I can say now that not a one of them I have run across were in any
>> way remotely like that at all. I know others who have seen them or had
>> their kids see them and they pretty much said the same thing.
>> Counselors these days are not there to help with life's problems.
>> They're there to diagnose and treat mental illness. Don't have mental
>> illness? They won't help. Have mental illness? Maybe they can't help.
>> Sometimes the best they can do is throw pills at you. The mental
>> illness part has not been my personal experience as it does not apply to
>> me. Does apply to other people I know. Not saying who these people are
>> as it is nobody's business here.
>>
>> Perhaps if you are a really rich person and can pay out of pocket for
>> some sort of counseling (I have no clue what kind), you could find a Bob
>> Newhart kind of counselor. But they aren't out here in the real world
>> for people who depend on their insurance to cover it.
>
> I trust that you realize that Bob Newhart is a fictional character.

Actually that's his real name.

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/14/2014 6:35 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> I trust that you realize that Bob Newhart is a fictional character.
>
> Does Bob Newhart know this??

Bwahaha!

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 5/14/2014 1:44 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>> On 5/13/2014 5:35 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I was rather excited about the new pears that I
>> >>>> bought. Apparently nobody else here was.
>> >>>
>> >>> How were they?
>> >>>
>> >> They're still a little too hard for my liking but with this hot
>> >> weather
>> >> and them being at room temp., hopefully I can report on them in a day
>> >> or two. If anyone cares. Seems that they don't care about my food
>> >> except to pick what I do to shreds.
>> >
>> > I'd like to know how the pears are when you eat them.
>> >
>> *sigh* Still hard. I'll let you know. I threw the bag out but I think
>> Angela said they were labeled "Personal pears".
>
> Sorry to hear you threw them out, they might have been good poached.
> It wouldn't have hurt to experiment.

I said that I threw the bag out. Not the pears. Why would I throw out
unripe pears? See... This is the sort of thing that happens to me here on
a continual basis. Someone gets something wrong that I posted and then
someone else will comment on it like it were fact. I can just see it now.
2 months from now, Dave or someone else will say... Remember when she threw
those pears out?

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 6:26 PM, sf wrote:
>
>> Sorry to hear you threw them out, they might have been good poached.
>> It wouldn't have hurt to experiment.
>
>
> Pears are a fall fruit. Would you expect then to be good in May?

The last ones I bought were fine. Pears are available year round and I
don't notice them tasting any better in the fall than any other time.

>

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/14/2014 6:26 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:19:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 5/14/2014 1:44 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 5/13/2014 5:35 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I was rather excited about the new pears that I
>>>>>>> bought. Apparently nobody else here was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How were they?
>>>>>>
>>>>> They're still a little too hard for my liking but with this hot
>>>>> weather
>>>>> and them being at room temp., hopefully I can report on them in a day
>>>>> or two. If anyone cares. Seems that they don't care about my food
>>>>> except to pick what I do to shreds.
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to know how the pears are when you eat them.
>>>>
>>> *sigh* Still hard. I'll let you know. I threw the bag out but I think
>>> Angela said they were labeled "Personal pears".
>>
>> Sorry to hear you threw them out, they might have been good poached.
>> It wouldn't have hurt to experiment.
>>
>>
> She said she threw out the bag, not the pears.
>
Oh yay! Somebody gets it! Thanks!

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:19:18 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> I'd like to know how the pears are when you eat them.
>>>
>> *sigh* Still hard. I'll let you know. I threw the bag out but I think
>> Angela said they were labeled "Personal pears".
>
> You said you're here to talk about the food, yet you couldn't even
> name some of the items you bought. It's almost as if the food was
> secondary to the purpose of your post.

No. I said that I threw the bag away so can't remember the name of them.
Costco had three kinds of pears, one of which probably isn't a pear. They
are called Apple/Pears, otherwise known as Asian pears. They have the big
pears that I bought last week. Those appear to have been Bartlets. And now
these. They are much smaller than the Bartlets.
>
> If you want to discuss your food, you should at least be interested
> enough to learn and be able to communicate what you actually bought.
>
> ObFood: Costco run today. The only new-to-me item I got was a
> take-n-bake meat combination pizza (sausage, pepperoni, salami, ground
> beef) to which I added mushrooms and pizza peppers. I'm eating it
> now. I like it much better than their snack bar pizza. Bigger and
> better than anything you get at Pizza Slut for $2 less and with twice
> the toppings.

The other two who live here had leftovers. I haven't eaten yet but will
make a ground beef and refried bean tostada. It's still very hot here.
Tomorrow? Sandwiches if we are home. We plan to go out in search of AC so
we may just go out to eat.

"Janet Wilder" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> On 5/14/2014 2:48 PM, Gary wrote:
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> I only remember the annoyance
>>> that I felt that he did not call me to say that he wasn't coming home
>>> for
>>> dinner. But I was told by a counselor. Oh yes, a counselor! We did
>>> try
>>> that route! That I was wrong for wanting to get the call like that and
>>> that
>>> it wasn't any of my business. That was just a guy thing, she said. Mm
>>> hm.
>>
>> Julie. No valid counselor would ever say that to you. Common sense
>> would tell you that not calling to say he won't be home for dinner is
>> just plain rude.
>>
>> Since you are the only cook, you should plan meals that all would like
>> and set a dinner time. If they don't get home on time, too bad...eat
>> leftovers. If they aren't in the mood for what you cooked, too damn
>> bad. Eat it or starve.
>>
>> G.
>>
> Anyone want to take a bet that that "counselor" was military?

She wasn't. AFAIK, the military doesn't have counselors that actually do
anything. There was a counselor there but she only farms out to whoever
takes our insurance. She was however doing her internship.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>
>>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
>>> they've never even tried.
>>>
>>
>> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
>> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
>> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
>> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
>
> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves, and
> this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it that
> way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.

Yes. I really do hate that. But I think I have KFed the biggest offender
there.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
>>>> they've never even tried.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
>>> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
>>> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
>>> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
>>
>> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
>> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
>> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
>> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
>> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>
>
> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.

Do a search of Bryan's posts.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 2014-05-14 5:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Not talking about you, Jill. You don't pretend to not like things
>>>>>> that you can't eat and when you do engage in the conversation (mainly
>>>>>> because someone pushes you into it) you're very careful to state why
>>>>>> you can't eat whatever it is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, and I especially love it when people comment negatively on foods
>>>>> they've never even tried.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Is that a major problem with the regulars here. I can appreciate that
>>>> some might indicate that something suggested does not appeal for one
>>>> reason or another. Sheldon has a thing about cheese and seafood. I am
>>>> not a picky eater, but there are things that do not appeal to me.
>>>
>>> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
>>> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
>>> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
>>> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
>>> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>>
>>
>> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.
>
> It's not meant to be specific, it's just an example of those kinds of
> posts, and I have seen Bryan do it to several people, and I've seen
> Brooklyn do it too. If you want word for word, you'll have to Google, not
> me.

Yep. I thought I had seen Sheldon do it. You confirmed it!

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:07:26 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> On 2014-05-14 7:03 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>>> Certainly not many, but there are a couple who jump on everything with a
>>> bunch of..."I've never eaten that garbage, and I never would eat that
>>> garbage, and people that eat that garbage are just garbage themselves,
>>> and this is what I eat, and this is how I fix it, and if you don't do it
>>> that way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>>
>> That's pretty specific. I would like to see one example of it.
>
> Uh, Psycho Boy Bryan Simmons, for one. He does it so often that it
> seems like a dozen people are doing it.

Hehehehe. No. He just keeps changing his name, probably to avoid our
filters.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:03:31 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> and if you don't do it that
>>> way, then you're ignorant" type of thing.
>>
>> Much more condemning phrases than "you're ignorant". When I see posts
>> like that, I just think to myself "it's no wonder rfc is dying". Who
>> wants to stick around after they get blasted like that?
>
> Yes, there are much worse condemnations, and it does get tiresome.

It's actually much nicer now with him in my KF.

"Doris Night" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 15:02:26 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Doris Night" > wrote in message
>>news
>
>>> Julie, why can't you refer to your family as "my daughter" and "my
>>> husband"? Why is it always "this person" or "one of the other people
>>> in this house" or somesuch?
>>>
>>> Doris
>>
>>Because as you can well see... Every time I do, someone pokes fun at
>>them
>>or picks at me for over sharing.
>
> That's a bit silly - everyone knows who you are talking about. It just
> seems quite rude to me. It sounds like you feel they are nothing
> better than minor annoyances. If my husband was in the habit of
> referring to me as "the other person who lives here" I'd be extremely
> hurt.

Obviously not since people automatically assumed it was someone else. And I
don't care if you think it is rude or not. I am sick to death of being
lambasted for most of the things I post here. Seems there is not a safe
thing for me to post. Even when I do try to keep it totally to food, I get
told that I shouldn't have bought it to begin with or that it is white trash
food or that I didn't cook it right or I shouldn't have made it or...

And there are two other people who live here. If I am vague then nobody can
accuse me of speaking ill of a certain person. You see? I just can't win.
Not here anyway...

On 2014-05-14 22:04, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> Sadly, she may never admit to it and will remain abused.
>>
>> You have only her word for her situation and I think it is pretty
>> clear that Julie has zero credibility. She is just a crackpot looking
>> for people to blame for her miserable existence. From what I have
>> gathered her, she has put up with a lot more abuse from her daughter
>> than from her husband. I think we should save our pity for the husband
>> and daughter.
>
> Dave, you are such a liar! My daughter is not abusive at all. You are
> taking one comment that I made in response to someone else when she was
> like...what...12? This is truly pathetic.


Yeah, right.Get is straight. It is not lying on my part if it happened,
or if you said that it happened. You whined here about how horribly she
treated you in a restaurant and you almost walked out and left here there.
That was your story.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-05-14 22:04, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> Sadly, she may never admit to it and will remain abused.
>>>
>>> You have only her word for her situation and I think it is pretty
>>> clear that Julie has zero credibility. She is just a crackpot looking
>>> for people to blame for her miserable existence. From what I have
>>> gathered her, she has put up with a lot more abuse from her daughter
>>> than from her husband. I think we should save our pity for the husband
>>> and daughter.
>>
>> Dave, you are such a liar! My daughter is not abusive at all. You are
>> taking one comment that I made in response to someone else when she was
>> like...what...12? This is truly pathetic.
>
>
> Yeah, right.Get is straight. It is not lying on my part if it happened, or
> if you said that it happened. You whined here about how horribly she
> treated you in a restaurant and you almost walked out and left here there.
> That was your story.

That was one incident and it was years ago. Did you not ever act up as a
tween? I sure as hell know that I did and all the time! Thankfully she
is/was not like me.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:07:15 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> I said that I threw the bag out. Not the pears. Why would I throw out
>> unripe pears? See... This is the sort of thing that happens to me here
>> on
>> a continual basis. Someone gets something wrong that I posted and then
>> someone else will comment on it like it were fact. I can just see it
>> now.
>> 2 months from now, Dave or someone else will say... Remember when she
>> threw
>> those pears out?
>
> What you said was ambiguous. Nobody is going to come back and say you
> threw pears out - get real and stop crying.
>
> But people *will* come back and remind others that you pre-cook and
> reheat steaks.

So? I also said that I don't always cook that way either.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:11:29 -0700, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> You said you're here to talk about the food, yet you couldn't even
>>> name some of the items you bought. It's almost as if the food was
>>> secondary to the purpose of your post.
>>
>> No. I said that I threw the bag away so can't remember the name of
>> them.
>
> <yawn> You still had ample opportunity to get the name of them. All
> we know is that they are "Mystery Pears". Why even try to discuss
> them if you can't tell us the name of these unique pears?

As I said there were three kinds of pears. Apple/Pears, Bartlet and these.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:25:38 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> It's all part of the syndrome. You basically assimilate or die and
>> victims
>> often find themselves acting out like their abusers. There is also a lot
>> of
>> Stockholm syndrome involved. For me to break the pattern I had to evict
>> my
>> family from my life and not look back. It's like kicking drugs.
>
> So that explains your emptiness and your bottles. Who kicked who?
> I'd bet it was mutual.


Have another shot, squishie. Alcohol solves all problems.

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:07:14 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:25:38 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's all part of the syndrome. You basically assimilate or die and
>>>> victims
>>>> often find themselves acting out like their abusers. There is also a
>>>> lot
>>>> of
>>>> Stockholm syndrome involved. For me to break the pattern I had to
>>>> evict
>>>> my
>>>> family from my life and not look back. It's like kicking drugs.
>>>
>>> So that explains your emptiness and your bottles. Who kicked who?
>>> I'd bet it was mutual.
>>
>> Have another shot, squishie. Alcohol solves all problems.
>
> You just did a nice job of explaining, and then demonstrating textbook
> psychological projection.


You'll drink to that I'm sure. Look, slushie, you're the one who in a
drunken stupor confessed his alcoholism on this group. You could tell me how
many tiles are in every drunk tank in Texas. Spare me the projection.
Everyone here knows you are a drunken loser.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

"Paul M. Cook" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Wed, 14 May 2014 20:07:14 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:25:38 -0700, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's all part of the syndrome. You basically assimilate or die and
>>>>> victims
>>>>> often find themselves acting out like their abusers. There is also a
>>>>> lot
>>>>> of
>>>>> Stockholm syndrome involved. For me to break the pattern I had to
>>>>> evict
>>>>> my
>>>>> family from my life and not look back. It's like kicking drugs.
>>>>
>>>> So that explains your emptiness and your bottles. Who kicked who?
>>>> I'd bet it was mutual.
>>>
>>> Have another shot, squishie. Alcohol solves all problems.
>>
>> You just did a nice job of explaining, and then demonstrating textbook
>> psychological projection.
>
>
> You'll drink to that I'm sure. Look, slushie, you're the one who in a
> drunken stupor confessed his alcoholism on this group. You could tell me
> how many tiles are in every drunk tank in Texas. Spare me the projection.
> Everyone here knows you are a drunken loser.

Good grief! Is nothing sacred here? Alcoholism is nothing to poke fun at.
I don't know it it's true or not and am not saying that it is but...
Really?