obviously dips are better

On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote:

> obviously dips are better
>
Depends on the use. How did you use it?


--

Good Food.
Good Friends.
Good Memories.

"tert in seattle" > wrote in message
...
> obviously dips are better

I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my salad!

sf wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote:
>
>> obviously dips are better
>>
> Depends on the use. How did you use it?

hmm... this may require mansplaining

are you up for it?

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
> ...
>> obviously dips are better
>
> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my salad!

with Julie it's all about the beans~!

On 5/19/2014 11:29 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
> sf wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> obviously dips are better
>>>
>> Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>
> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>
> are you up for it?
>

Mansplaining: it's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Mainly men.

On Tue, 20 May 2014 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> > wrote:
> >
> >> obviously dips are better
> >>
> > Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>
> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>
> are you up for it?

You obviously didn't figure out what mansplaining is.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

"tert in seattle" > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> obviously dips are better
>>
>> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my salad!
>
> with Julie it's all about the beans~!

And cats! Give me beans and cats and I'll be happy happy!

On Mon, 19 May 2014 23:36:51 -0400, Travis McGee
> wrote:

> On 5/19/2014 11:29 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
> > sf wrote:
> >> On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> obviously dips are better
> >>>
> >> Depends on the use. How did you use it?
> >
> > hmm... this may require mansplaining
> >
> > are you up for it?
> >
>
> Mansplaining: it's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. Mainly men.

Yep. Huge egos who think they know everything.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> obviously dips are better
>> >>
>> > Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>>
>> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>>
>> are you up for it?
>
> You obviously didn't figure out what mansplaining is.

work with me here

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
> > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>> > On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> obviously dips are better
>> >>
>> > Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>>
>> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>>
>> are you up for it?
>
> You obviously didn't figure out what mansplaining is.
>
I think he did.

On 5/20/2014 2:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> sf wrote:
>>> > On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> obviously dips are better
>>> >>
>>> > Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>>>
>>> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>>>
>>> are you up for it?
>>
>> You obviously didn't figure out what mansplaining is.
>>
> I think he did.

For what it's worth Julie, perspicaciousness is appreciated here. I'm a fan.

"Travis McGee" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/20/2014 2:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 03:29:44 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> sf wrote:
>>>> > On Sun, 18 May 2014 03:17:02 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> obviously dips are better
>>>> >>
>>>> > Depends on the use. How did you use it?
>>>>
>>>> hmm... this may require mansplaining
>>>>
>>>> are you up for it?
>>>
>>> You obviously didn't figure out what mansplaining is.
>>>
>> I think he did.
>
> For what it's worth Julie, perspicaciousness is appreciated here. I'm a
> fan.

Oooh! Excellent choice of words! From one bipedal word hoard to another!

On 5/19/2014 11:30 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> obviously dips are better
>>
>> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my salad!
>
> with Julie it's all about the beans~!
>
Since I restrict the amount of fat that I eat, I ask for salad dressing
"on the side" and I dip the vegs into it. It's quite obvious that I eat
much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?

--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not." in Reply To.

"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/19/2014 11:30 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> obviously dips are better
>>>
>>> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my
>>> salad!
>>
>> with Julie it's all about the beans~!
>>
> Since I restrict the amount of fat that I eat, I ask for salad dressing
> "on the side" and I dip the vegs into it. It's quite obvious that I eat
> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?

I reckon it is whatever you want to call it))
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

James Silverton wrote:
> On 5/19/2014 11:30 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> obviously dips are better
>>>
>>> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my salad!
>>
>> with Julie it's all about the beans~!
>>
> Since I restrict the amount of fat that I eat, I ask for salad dressing
> "on the side" and I dip the vegs into it. It's quite obvious that I eat
> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?

this is the essential question

On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
> wrote:
> >
> It's quite obvious that I eat
> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?

Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).















































































--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On 5/20/2014 12:14 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
> > wrote:
>>>
>> It's quite obvious that I eat
>> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?
>
> Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
> know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
> he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).

That must be a pretty recent coinage and it has not hit the online
Oxford English Dictionary as yet. It is technically a "******* word"
tho' I suppose you could dignify it by calling it a portmanteau word.
The "plain" part of explain is from Latin planus meaning flat.


--
Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD)

Extraneous "not." in Reply To.

On Tue, 20 May 2014 12:24:57 -0400, James Silverton
> wrote:

> On 5/20/2014 12:14 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
> > > wrote:
> >>>
> >> It's quite obvious that I eat
> >> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?
> >
> > Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
> > know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
> > he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).
>
> That must be a pretty recent coinage and it has not hit the online
> Oxford English Dictionary as yet. It is technically a "******* word"
> tho' I suppose you could dignify it by calling it a portmanteau word.
> The "plain" part of explain is from Latin planus meaning flat.

GIYF

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/20/2014 12:14 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>> It's quite obvious that I eat
>>> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?
>>
>> Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
>> know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
>> he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).
>
> That must be a pretty recent coinage and it has not hit the online Oxford
> English Dictionary as yet. It is technically a "******* word" tho' I
> suppose you could dignify it by calling it a portmanteau word. The "plain"
> part of explain is from Latin planus meaning flat.

I hadn't heard of it either.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

James Silverton wrote:
> On 5/20/2014 12:14 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>> It's quite obvious that I eat
>>> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?
>>
>> Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
>> know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
>> he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).
>
> That must be a pretty recent coinage and it has not hit the online
> Oxford English Dictionary as yet. It is technically a "******* word"
> tho' I suppose you could dignify it by calling it a portmanteau word.
> The "plain" part of explain is from Latin planus meaning flat.

truly ugly portmanteau words are more appropriately referred to as
frankenwords

e.g., plannovation

"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/19/2014 11:30 PM, tert in seattle wrote:
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> "tert in seattle" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> obviously dips are better
>>>
>>> I suppose that depends on the use. I wouldn't want bean dip on my
>>> salad!
>>
>> with Julie it's all about the beans~!
>>
> Since I restrict the amount of fat that I eat, I ask for salad dressing
> "on the side" and I dip the vegs into it. It's quite obvious that I eat
> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?

There is a restaurant here that offers a "Snack Veggy Trio". It is three
kinds of raw vegetables with your choice of dressing for dipping. We
usually get Italian.

"James Silverton" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/20/2014 12:14 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:13:02 -0400, James Silverton
>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>> It's quite obvious that I eat
>>> much less dressing but is this a "dip" or a "dressing"?
>>
>> Shhhh. You're not supposed to ask that question because he doesn't
>> know what mansplaining is and didn't bother to look it up (which means
>> he's probably a typical "mansplainer" in RL).
>
> That must be a pretty recent coinage and it has not hit the online Oxford
> English Dictionary as yet. It is technically a "******* word" tho' I
> suppose you could dignify it by calling it a portmanteau word. The "plain"
> part of explain is from Latin planus meaning flat.
>
Uh... Not "plain" but "splain". As in "Splain, Lucy, splain!" As Ricky
often said to Lucy on the I Love Lucy show.