Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I usually like Costco's products. But epic fail on this one. It was a
thick plastic bag that said "Sliced Roast Beef". The only ingredients were the beef, salt and pepper. How can you go wrong with that? Well, I'll tell you how! For starters there was less meat inside than there appeared from the outside. Yes, it listed the weight but what they did was to put two smaller bags inside of the larger one with a lot of air space. Various heating instructions were given, or you could serve cold on a sandwich although I fail to see how that would work. The slices were fairly thick but there was sort of a juice in the package. Seemed a bit too thick to be the natural juice although it had to be. Perhaps reduced a lot? For sure too thin to be gravy. Each was shaped like an oval but as I tried to remove the slices, they curled up. The meat was cooked very rare. One package much more rare than the other. Even the end pieces were not entirely cooked through. But the icky thing? There was sort of a tough, clear thing across the top of each beef. I had no clue what it was but assumed it would sort of like melt off or something as I heated it. It did not. My first bite was not so good. Meat was pretty chewy, but I managed to swallow it. But the second and third bite? I got a mouthful of what seemed like that gristle that you sometimes get when you are eating a chicken drumstick. It was sort of like crackly chewy as in...I could hear weird noises as I tried to chew it. I had to spit out both bites and the second one literally gagged me. I guess the flavor was okay. But the rest? Left very much to be desired. This stuff was so bad that I had to toss the rest out. Nobody could bring themselves to eat it. Perhaps it was made by the same company that made the precooked steak strips that I bought. They were very rare and very tough and nobody would eat those either. ![]() But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't go over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't like peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no clue why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I have never had beef come out like that at all. Weird. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:03 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't go > over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't like > peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no clue > why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I have never had > beef come out like that at all. Weird. That's a good lesson about why not to buy those things. You knew you don't like peaches with beef, so what on earth possessed you to buy it? <shrug> There is no cure for stupidity. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:03 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >> I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't >> go >> over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't like >> peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no >> clue >> why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I have never >> had >> beef come out like that at all. Weird. > > That's a good lesson about why not to buy those things. You knew you > don't like peaches with beef, so what on earth possessed you to buy > it? <shrug> There is no cure for stupidity. I didn't buy it and you didn't read what I wrote. I made that dish many years ago. I made it because I knew that my husband loved beef. We were not married then. I didn't know that he didn't like peaches. I know that I don't like them but I was a vegetarian then. I wasn't going to eat it. I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have been? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Julie Bove" > wrote in message ... > I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, > salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have > been? It could be gristle. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:48:12 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... > > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:03 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > > wrote: > > > >> I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't > >> go > >> over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't like > >> peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no > >> clue > >> why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I have never > >> had > >> beef come out like that at all. Weird. > > > > That's a good lesson about why not to buy those things. You knew you > > don't like peaches with beef, so what on earth possessed you to buy > > it? <shrug> There is no cure for stupidity. > > I didn't buy it and you didn't read what I wrote. I made that dish many > years ago. I made it because I knew that my husband loved beef. We were > not married then. I didn't know that he didn't like peaches. I know that I > don't like them but I was a vegetarian then. I wasn't going to eat it. > > I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, salt > and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have been? Your point was totally obscured by your long winded story. Don't buy that pre-cut, pre-seasoned pre-cooked crap and you won't be disappointed. -- I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cheri" > wrote in message ... > > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > ... > >> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, >> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have >> been? > > It could be gristle. Ew. Really? I didn't know that beef had that. Double ew. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: > >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, >>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have >>> been? >> >> It could be gristle. > > OTOH, it may have been gristle. > > I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut > it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than > throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion > and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that > somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. > Believe me, there was no way to enjoy this stuff. Even without the gristle it was a tough as I imagine shoe leather would be. I grew up eating tough, dry beef and my MIL made the same but that was nothing compared to this. If this were the only meat available, everyone would be a vegetarian. I just didn't know that beef could have gristle. The only time I've ever had it was on chicken. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 2:53 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: > >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: >>> >>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, >>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have >>>>> been? >>>> >>>> It could be gristle. >>> >>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. >>> >>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut >>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than >>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion >>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that >>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. >>> >> Believe me.... > > I don't. I never did and never will. > > -sw > This exchange reminds me a lot of "The Peterkin Papers". This was a collection of children's stories, written in the 19th century. The story was always about some trivial problem that the Peterkin children got themselves into. They would try increasingly elaborate solutions, all to no avail. Finally someone would say "let's go ask the lady from Philadelphia", and off they'd go. The lady would invariably suggest a very commonsense solution to the problem, and everyone would be satisfied. I haven't read these in a very long time, but the one that came to mind while reading this was about how one of the Peterkins put salt into a cup of coffee accidentally instead of sugar. To try to fix the coffee they enlist a chemist, who suggests adding all sorts of stuff to the coffee, which, of course, just makes it worse. The Peterkins in despair consult the lady from Philadelphia; her advice is to just make another cup of coffee. Problem solved. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: > >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: >>> >>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just >>>>> beef, >>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle >>>>> have >>>>> been? >>>> >>>> It could be gristle. >>> >>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. >>> >>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut >>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than >>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion >>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that >>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. >>> >> Believe me.... > > I don't. I never did and never will. I would mail you the rest of it on dry ice so that you could judge for yourself. But it already went in the green bin. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Travis McGee" > wrote in message ... > On 6/16/2014 2:53 AM, Sqwertz wrote: >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: >> >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>> >>>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just >>>>>> beef, >>>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle >>>>>> have >>>>>> been? >>>>> >>>>> It could be gristle. >>>> >>>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. >>>> >>>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut >>>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than >>>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion >>>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that >>>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. >>>> >>> Believe me.... >> >> I don't. I never did and never will. >> >> -sw >> > > This exchange reminds me a lot of "The Peterkin Papers". This was a > collection of children's stories, written in the 19th century. The story > was always about some trivial problem that the Peterkin children got > themselves into. They would try increasingly elaborate solutions, all to > no avail. Finally someone would say "let's go ask the lady from > Philadelphia", and off they'd go. The lady would invariably suggest a very > commonsense solution to the problem, and everyone would be satisfied. > > I haven't read these in a very long time, but the one that came to mind > while reading this was about how one of the Peterkins put salt into a cup > of coffee accidentally instead of sugar. To try to fix the coffee they > enlist a chemist, who suggests adding all sorts of stuff to the coffee, > which, of course, just makes it worse. The Peterkins in despair consult > the lady from Philadelphia; her advice is to just make another cup of > coffee. Problem solved. I do remember that story. And that reminds me of someone I know who was driving his car. The windshield got more and more fogged up. I kept telling him to put the defogger on. He was using his hand to do things to the various controls, none of which was the defogger. He then snapped at me, "I'm doing a variety of things!" To which I replied, "I can see that. But why not just put on the defogger, since we know that will work!" |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 4:27 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Travis McGee" > wrote in message > ... >> On 6/16/2014 2:53 AM, Sqwertz wrote: >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: >>> >>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >>>>>> ... >>>>>> >>>>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just >>>>>>> beef, >>>>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that >>>>>>> gristle have >>>>>>> been? >>>>>> >>>>>> It could be gristle. >>>>> >>>>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. >>>>> >>>>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut >>>>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than >>>>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion >>>>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that >>>>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. >>>>> >>>> Believe me.... >>> >>> I don't. I never did and never will. >>> >>> -sw >>> >> >> This exchange reminds me a lot of "The Peterkin Papers". This was a >> collection of children's stories, written in the 19th century. The >> story was always about some trivial problem that the Peterkin children >> got themselves into. They would try increasingly elaborate solutions, >> all to no avail. Finally someone would say "let's go ask the lady from >> Philadelphia", and off they'd go. The lady would invariably suggest a >> very commonsense solution to the problem, and everyone would be >> satisfied. >> >> I haven't read these in a very long time, but the one that came to >> mind while reading this was about how one of the Peterkins put salt >> into a cup of coffee accidentally instead of sugar. To try to fix the >> coffee they enlist a chemist, who suggests adding all sorts of stuff >> to the coffee, which, of course, just makes it worse. The Peterkins in >> despair consult the lady from Philadelphia; her advice is to just make >> another cup of coffee. Problem solved. > > I do remember that story. And that reminds me of someone I know who was > driving his car. The windshield got more and more fogged up. I kept > telling him to put the defogger on. He was using his hand to do things > to the various controls, none of which was the defogger. He then > snapped at me, "I'm doing a variety of things!" To which I replied, "I > can see that. But why not just put on the defogger, since we know that > will work!" Yep. And people do get distracted, and end up doing a variety of things that just don't address the problem. I guess it's human nature. I'm glad I'm able to help in understanding this problem. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of plastic that separated the slices.
N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-06-16 1:00 AM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:48:12 -0700, "Julie Bove" > > wrote: > >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:03 -0700, "Julie Bove" >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't >>>> go >>>> over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't like >>>> peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no >>>> clue >>>> why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I have never >>>> had >>>> beef come out like that at all. Weird. >>> >>> That's a good lesson about why not to buy those things. You knew you >>> don't like peaches with beef, so what on earth possessed you to buy >>> it? <shrug> There is no cure for stupidity. >> >> I didn't buy it and you didn't read what I wrote. I made that dish many >> years ago. I made it because I knew that my husband loved beef. We were >> not married then. I didn't know that he didn't like peaches. I know that I >> don't like them but I was a vegetarian then. I wasn't going to eat it. >> >> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, salt >> and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have been? > > Your point was totally obscured by your long winded story. Don't buy > that pre-cut, pre-seasoned pre-cooked crap and you won't be > disappointed. > Oh yes she will. She will still find something wrong. It is the Bove MO. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: >Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of plastic that separated the slices. > >N. Guffaw!!!!! Probably ![]() Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 8:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of plastic that separated the slices. > > N. > That was my thought, too! Sort of like the plastic some places use to keep pre-sliced cheese separated. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 16, 2014 2:25:12 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: > > > > > >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > > >> ... > > >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > > >>>> ... > > >>>> > > >>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just > > >>>>> beef, > > >>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle > > >>>>> have > > >>>>> been? > > >>>> > > >>>> It could be gristle. > > >>> > > >>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. > > >>> > > >>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut > > >>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than > > >>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion > > >>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that > > >>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. > > >>> > > >> Believe me.... > > > > > > I don't. I never did and never will. > > > > I would mail you the rest of it on dry ice so that you could judge for > > yourself. But it already went in the green bin. Julie...why do you buy strange stuff? Just stick to the stuff you know you like and live a nice dull life with few problems. A Home Economics course might be beneficial as you never had a role model to educate you as you grew up. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy" > wrote in message news:00bcf7a6-8a61-44ba-a4bc- > Julie...why do you buy strange stuff? Just stick to the stuff you know you > like and live a nice dull life with few problems. >A Home Economics course > might be beneficial as you never had a role model to educate you as you > grew up. Roast beef is not "strange stuff" and even the occasional package of roast beef will have a thin line of gristle or whatever it is running through it. She also took Home Ec in high school. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> I usually like Costco's products. But epic fail on this one. It was a > thick plastic bag that said "Sliced Roast Beef". The only ingredients > were the beef, salt and pepper. How can you go wrong with that? Well, > I'll tell you how! > > For starters there was less meat inside than there appeared from the > outside. Yes, it listed the weight but what they did was to put two > smaller bags inside of the larger one with a lot of air space. > > Various heating instructions were given, or you could serve cold on a > sandwich although I fail to see how that would work. The slices were > fairly thick but there was sort of a juice in the package. Seemed a bit > too thick to be the natural juice although it had to be. Perhaps > reduced a lot? For sure too thin to be gravy. > > Each was shaped like an oval but as I tried to remove the slices, they > curled up. The meat was cooked very rare. One package much more rare > than the other. Even the end pieces were not entirely cooked through. > > But the icky thing? There was sort of a tough, clear thing across the > top of each beef. I had no clue what it was but assumed it would sort > of like melt off or something as I heated it. It did not. My first > bite was not so good. Meat was pretty chewy, but I managed to swallow > it. But the second and third bite? I got a mouthful of what seemed > like that gristle that you sometimes get when you are eating a chicken > drumstick. It was sort of like crackly chewy as in...I could hear weird > noises as I tried to chew it. I had to spit out both bites and the > second one literally gagged me. I guess the flavor was okay. But the > rest? Left very much to be desired. This stuff was so bad that I had > to toss the rest out. Nobody could bring themselves to eat it. > > Perhaps it was made by the same company that made the precooked steak > strips that I bought. They were very rare and very tough and nobody > would eat those either. ![]() > > But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look > like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! > > I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't > go over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't > like peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have > no clue why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I > have never had beef come out like that at all. Weird. What a waste of money. My DH, may he rest in peace, liked roast beef sandwiches. I would not feed him anything from a deli or Costco. I bought an eye round of beef at Sam's Club and seasoned and roasted it myself. He would slice off some of the cold meat for his lunch. I would make half of the eye round at a time and freeze the other half for later roasting. Since I'd always roast it to rare, we could heat it up if we wanted a roast beef dinner. Most times we'd have a roast beef dinner the day I roasted the meat. -- Janet Wilder Way-the-heck-south Texas Spelling doesn't count. Cooking does. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, June 15, 2014 11:54:50 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > > I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, > > > salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have > > > been? > > > > It could be gristle. > LOL. I really like braised "connective tissue" of the sort you get in beef shanks or cheeks. I'm sure some folks are thiking, "Eww. Disgusting," but I like the gooey, sticky texture and the subtle flavor. > > Cheri --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 16, 2014 1:17:25 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> > > Believe me, there was no way to enjoy this stuff. Even without the gristle > > it was a tough as I imagine shoe leather would be. I grew up eating tough, > > dry beef and my MIL made the same but that was nothing compared to this. If > > this were the only meat available, everyone would be a vegetarian. Not me. I don't mind gristle. OTOH, if every woman on Earth was like you, a lot of us guys would choose celibacy. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, June 16, 2014 3:27:48 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Travis McGee" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On 6/16/2014 2:53 AM, Sqwertz wrote: > > >> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: > > >> > > >>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message > > >>> ... > > >>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message > > >>>>> ... > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just > > >>>>>> beef, > > >>>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle > > >>>>>> have > > >>>>>> been? > > >>>>> > > >>>>> It could be gristle. > > >>>> > > >>>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. > > >>>> > > >>>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut > > >>>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than > > >>>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion > > >>>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that > > >>>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. > > >>>> > > >>> Believe me.... > > >> > > >> I don't. I never did and never will. > > >> > > >> -sw > > >> > > > > > > This exchange reminds me a lot of "The Peterkin Papers". This was a > > > collection of children's stories, written in the 19th century. The story > > > was always about some trivial problem that the Peterkin children got > > > themselves into. They would try increasingly elaborate solutions, all to > > > no avail. Finally someone would say "let's go ask the lady from > > > Philadelphia", and off they'd go. The lady would invariably suggest a very > > > commonsense solution to the problem, and everyone would be satisfied. > > > > > > I haven't read these in a very long time, but the one that came to mind > > > while reading this was about how one of the Peterkins put salt into a cup > > > of coffee accidentally instead of sugar. To try to fix the coffee they > > > enlist a chemist, who suggests adding all sorts of stuff to the coffee, > > > which, of course, just makes it worse. The Peterkins in despair consult > > > the lady from Philadelphia; her advice is to just make another cup of > > > coffee. Problem solved. > > > > I do remember that story. And that reminds me of someone I know who was > > driving his car. The windshield got more and more fogged up. I kept > > telling him to put the defogger on. He was using his hand to do things to > > the various controls, none of which was the defogger. He then snapped at > > me, "I'm doing a variety of things!" To which I replied, "I can see that. > > But why not just put on the defogger, since we know that will work!" You get into cars with folks who are even dumber than yourself. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 20:37:03 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >I usually like Costco's products. But epic fail on this one. It was a >thick plastic bag that said "Sliced Roast Beef". The only ingredients were >the beef, salt and pepper. How can you go wrong with that? Well, I'll tell >you how! What were you expecting from meat processed and packed that way? <snip> >We just don't like >peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have no clue >why I thought making that would be a good idea. At least this time you're thinking the same thing we are. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:04:14 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: > >"Cheri" > wrote in message ... >> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just beef, >>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle have >>> been? >> >> It could be gristle. > >Ew. Really? I didn't know that beef had that. Double ew. Say what? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:20:25 -0500, Janet Wilder >
wrote: >On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> I usually like Costco's products. But epic fail on this one. It was a >> thick plastic bag that said "Sliced Roast Beef". The only ingredients >> were the beef, salt and pepper. How can you go wrong with that? Well, >> I'll tell you how! >> >> For starters there was less meat inside than there appeared from the >> outside. Yes, it listed the weight but what they did was to put two >> smaller bags inside of the larger one with a lot of air space. >> >> Various heating instructions were given, or you could serve cold on a >> sandwich although I fail to see how that would work. The slices were >> fairly thick but there was sort of a juice in the package. Seemed a bit >> too thick to be the natural juice although it had to be. Perhaps >> reduced a lot? For sure too thin to be gravy. >> >> Each was shaped like an oval but as I tried to remove the slices, they >> curled up. The meat was cooked very rare. One package much more rare >> than the other. Even the end pieces were not entirely cooked through. >> >> But the icky thing? There was sort of a tough, clear thing across the >> top of each beef. I had no clue what it was but assumed it would sort >> of like melt off or something as I heated it. It did not. My first >> bite was not so good. Meat was pretty chewy, but I managed to swallow >> it. But the second and third bite? I got a mouthful of what seemed >> like that gristle that you sometimes get when you are eating a chicken >> drumstick. It was sort of like crackly chewy as in...I could hear weird >> noises as I tried to chew it. I had to spit out both bites and the >> second one literally gagged me. I guess the flavor was okay. But the >> rest? Left very much to be desired. This stuff was so bad that I had >> to toss the rest out. Nobody could bring themselves to eat it. >> >> Perhaps it was made by the same company that made the precooked steak >> strips that I bought. They were very rare and very tough and nobody >> would eat those either. ![]() >> >> But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look >> like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! >> >> I have cooked countless roast beeves before and the only one that didn't >> go over well was the Company's Coming Beef and Peaches. We just don't >> like peaches with beef. We actually don't like peaches at all so I have >> no clue why I thought making that would be a good idea. Anyway... I >> have never had beef come out like that at all. Weird. > >What a waste of money. My DH, may he rest in peace, liked roast beef >sandwiches. I would not feed him anything from a deli or Costco. I >bought an eye round of beef at Sam's Club and seasoned and roasted it >myself. He would slice off some of the cold meat for his lunch. I >would make half of the eye round at a time and freeze the other half for >later roasting. > >Since I'd always roast it to rare, we could heat it up if we wanted a >roast beef dinner. Most times we'd have a roast beef dinner the day I >roasted the meat. Eye round is an excellent flavorful cut so long as it's roasted to no more than medium rare... but then no roast beef cut is any good well done. When I make eye round I slice off what's needed, then the next day when it's cold from the fridge it's easy to slice so I slice it all... can eat it over the next couple three days. With ferocious meat eating pets no roast beef ever gets wasted. I like eye round also because of its low fat content and it contains very little waste... the only part that doesn't get eaten is the butcher twine I use to tie it... I like to tie roasts as it makes them easier to turn/lift without stabbing with a fork, I especially like to truss a chicken to make handling easier. If you have a frozen eye round don't fully defrost it before roasting and it will be juicier and less shrinkage, pork loin the same... and start in a 375º oven and after 15 minutes drop it to 325º and it will also dry less... I suggest seasoning prior to freezing, just go easy on the salt, or salt at serving. I like cold roast beef sandwiches, especially rare eye round... horseradish was invented for roast beef... if I want heat I much prefer horseradish to hot pepper... hot Chinese mustard is much superior to hot peppers with beef. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 12:29:14 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote: >On Monday, June 16, 2014 1:17:25 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> >> Believe me, there was no way to enjoy this stuff. Even without the gristle >> >> it was a tough as I imagine shoe leather would be. I grew up eating tough, >> >> dry beef and my MIL made the same but that was nothing compared to this. If >> >> this were the only meat available, everyone would be a vegetarian. > >Not me. I don't mind gristle. I do believe you love gristley penises. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nancy2" > wrote in message ... > Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of > plastic that separated the slices. I really don't know. This wasn't between the slices. It was on top of the meat. I prepared it exactly like it said to do. I could see the clear stuff. Was about 1/4" thick and hard to the touch. The meat came sealed in two plastic bags, and both were put in another plastic bag. Dunno. But I won't ever buy it again! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 > > wrote: > >>Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of >>plastic that separated the slices. >> >>N. > Guffaw!!!!! Probably ![]() > Janet US No. It didn't go between the slices. It was clearly on top of the meat, adhered to the meat. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 6/16/2014 8:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote: >> Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type of >> plastic that separated the slices. >> >> N. >> > That was my thought, too! Sort of like the plastic some places use to > keep pre-sliced cheese separated. Nope. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy" > wrote in message ... > On Monday, June 16, 2014 2:25:12 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 23:17:25 -0700, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message >> >> >> ... >> >> >>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 21:54:50 -0700, Cheri wrote: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message >> >> >>>> ... >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>>> I was asking about the beef that I bought at Costco. It was just >> >> >>>>> beef, >> >> >>>>> salt and pepper. Precooked and presliced. What could that gristle >> >> >>>>> have >> >> >>>>> been? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> It could be gristle. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> OTOH, it may have been gristle. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> I suppose it never occurred to her (or her family) that she could cut >> >> >>> it off, eat it, enjoy it, and move on with her life - rather than >> >> >>> throwing it away or returning it. But I'm sure there were a zillion >> >> >>> and one reasons WHY she couldn't have done that. So never mind that >> >> >>> somebody would state the obvious solution to a simple problem. >> >> >>> >> >> >> Believe me.... >> >> > >> >> > I don't. I never did and never will. >> >> >> >> I would mail you the rest of it on dry ice so that you could judge for >> >> yourself. But it already went in the green bin. > > Julie...why do you buy strange stuff? Just stick to the stuff you know you > like and live a nice dull life with few problems. A Home Economics course > might be beneficial as you never had a role model to educate you as you > grew up. I wasn't aware that roast beef was strange. I not only took Home Ec for two years but I was the teacher's aide. I picked up the package. It said it contained beef, salt and pepper. I bought it at Costco and I know from a show that I saw on TV that Costco doesn't buy things until they have been well tested. They dropped the ball on this one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cheri" > wrote in message ... > > "Roy" > wrote in message news:00bcf7a6-8a61-44ba-a4bc- >> Julie...why do you buy strange stuff? Just stick to the stuff you know >> you like and live a nice dull life with few problems. >A Home Economics >> course might be beneficial as you never had a role model to educate you >> as you grew up. > > Roast beef is not "strange stuff" and even the occasional package of roast > beef will have a thin line of gristle or whatever it is running through > it. She also took Home Ec in high school. I must have just gotten lucky. Nearly 55 years old and never encountered gristle on beef before. Fat? Yes. But not gristle. I did look it up online but the description of what gristle looks like doesn't sound to me like what this looked like. It said that gristle was thin and silvery but this was thick and clear. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 15:02:07 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >"Roy" > wrote in message ... >> On Monday, June 16, 2014 2:25:12 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:. >> >> Julie...why do you buy strange stuff? Just stick to the stuff you know you >> like and live a nice dull life with few problems. A Home Economics course >> might be beneficial as you never had a role model to educate you as you >> grew up. > >I wasn't aware that roast beef was strange. Well, normally roast beef means a hunk of raw beef that you've roasted. From what I can deduce, you've bought some sort of pre-cooked and sliced mystery meat... well, surely it is beef but who knows what cuts. Not the good ones, natch. And you call that roast beef? >I not only took Home Ec for two years but I was the teacher's aide. And yet you equate that crap with real roast beef. >I picked up the package. It said it contained beef, salt and pepper. I >bought it at Costco and I know from a show that I saw on TV that Costco >doesn't buy things until they have been well tested. They dropped the ball >on this one. No, they didn't. You did. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/16/2014 5:58 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message > ... >> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 >> > wrote: >> >>> Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type >>> of plastic that separated the slices. >>> >>> N. >> Guffaw!!!!! Probably ![]() >> Janet US > > No. It didn't go between the slices. It was clearly on top of the > meat, adhered to the meat. Now you know better than to buy it again. ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 6/16/2014 5:58 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Janet Bostwick" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 05:20:29 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Are you sure that clear stuff was edible?? It sounds like some type >>>> of plastic that separated the slices. >>>> >>>> N. >>> Guffaw!!!!! Probably ![]() >>> Janet US >> >> No. It didn't go between the slices. It was clearly on top of the >> meat, adhered to the meat. > > Now you know better than to buy it again. ![]() For sure I will not buy it again. The picture looked so good and we all like roast beef so I thought it would make for a quick meal. Boy was I wrong on that! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look > like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! My guess would be that it's some sort of connective tissue that is usually trimmed from the beef before it's sold. -- DreadfulBitch I'm a nobody, nobody is perfect, therefore I'm perfect. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message ... > On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >> >> But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look >> like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! > > My guess would be that it's some sort of connective tissue that is usually > trimmed from the beef before it's sold. > Blech. Thanks! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sqwertz" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:09:14 -0500, DreadfulBitch wrote: > >> On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >>> >>> But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look >>> like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! >> >> My guess would be that it's some sort of connective tissue that is >> usually trimmed from the beef before it's sold. > > Yes. It's like the thin piece of clear gristle that runs through a > beef blade steak or roast: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blade_s...lade_steak.jpg > > But is present in many other cuts as well - often on top of the > muscle. > > Now that's settled lets move on to another non-Julie thread. Blech, blech, blech. Oh. Like your *** Penzy's thread? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Jun 2014 21:53:51 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote: >"DreadfulBitch" > wrote in message ... >> On 6/15/2014 10:37 PM, Julie Bove wrote: >>> >>> But my question is... What was that icky clear stuff? If didn't look >>> like fat and the meat didn't seem fatty. It was just plain bad! >> >> My guess would be that it's some sort of connective tissue that is usually >> trimmed from the beef before it's sold. >> >Blech. Thanks! Trauma counselling may be required. And then counselling for the trauma counsellor, of course. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Beef Roast - What I Did | General Cooking | |||
Roast Shoulder or Chuck Roast Beef | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Roast Shoulder or Chuck Roast Beef | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Beef Roast | Recipes (moderated) |