"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> Jeßus > wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:54:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> "barbie gee" > wrote in message
>>> crg.pbz...
>>>>
>>>> so how come the Post Office doesn't provide replacement keys?
>>>
>>> Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And
>>> Mill
>>> Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And you
>>> expect
>>> them to keep that many duplicate keys?
>>
>> How can anyone be as stupid as you and still be breathing unassisted?
>>
>> You don't think your local post office can order the key in? I'll bet
>> theres a unique number on that key. Thats how it's done in Australia
>> and elsewhere. There must be well over a million PO boxes here, how do
>> you think they manage all the keys and locks, and replacements for the
>> same?
>
> Not to mention, there wouldn't be 33,000 unique, individual keys anyways
> because 1 out of every so many is a duplicate. Same with car keys, etc.

I never said that. Just giving you an example that I'm not in some podunk
little town. I am just getting sick of this! I know what I was told by the
PO as to what I needed to do to get a new lock. Maybe they lied to me.
That was 10 years ago. Sheesh. And you people here are the ones making the
big deal of it! So we share a key. Why do *you* have a problem with it?

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Cheri" > wrote:
>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>>>> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>>>
>>>
>>> I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>>> I've known her for that matter, but she has said she was a writer in the
>>> past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and then
>>> claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies. Sad really.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>> record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013, and > as
>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's the
>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof? GIYF.
>
> I don't think that I did or if I did, it was taken out of context.

Not quite sure how anyone could take "I am a writer" out of context. Except
you, of course.
--
jinx the minx

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:54:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "barbie gee" > wrote in message
>>>> crg.pbz...
>>>>>
>>>>> so how come the Post Office doesn't provide replacement keys?
>>>>
>>>> Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And >>> Mill
>>>> Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And you >>> expect
>>>> them to keep that many duplicate keys?
>>>
>>> How can anyone be as stupid as you and still be breathing unassisted?
>>>
>>> You don't think your local post office can order the key in? I'll bet
>>> theres a unique number on that key. Thats how it's done in Australia
>>> and elsewhere. There must be well over a million PO boxes here, how do
>>> you think they manage all the keys and locks, and replacements for the
>>> same?
>>
>> Not to mention, there wouldn't be 33,000 unique, individual keys anyways
>> because 1 out of every so many is a duplicate. Same with car keys, etc.
>
> I never said that. Just giving you an example that I'm not in some
> podunk little town. I am just getting sick of this! I know what I was
> told by the PO as to what I needed to do to get a new lock. Maybe they
> lied to me. That was 10 years ago. Sheesh. And you people here are the
> ones making the big deal of it! So we share a key. Why do *you* have a problem with it?

I don't give a rat's ass if you share a key or not. Your reading
comprehension isn't so great.
--
jinx the minx

On 2014-06-23 14:46, Cheri wrote:

>> When she was a writer... was that before or after her career as a
>> checkout clerk? I didn't twist her words when I referred to her
>> complaint about her husband stopping for supper in the way home,
>> something that she later denied saying, and also later said that I
>> drag up things from the past. Maybe you should pay attention to her
>> stories a little close to see how they change instead of compulsively
>> replying to her posts and defending her. There are reasons why several
>> people here comment about Julie's changing stories.
>
> Hardly. You're the one that replies to all posts about her like some
> kind of stalker. Get a life.
>

Feel free to go through the posts in the group and count your replies to
her verus mine to or about her.

On 6/23/2014 7:44 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> Yes, all that. Plus the artificial colours, flavours and preservatives
> in the Icee thing, probably in the popcorn too.
> I just can't eat shit like that.

I'm sure the little bag of popcorn is as bad as microwave popcorn with
that awful powdered fake butter. A woman I worked with used to make it
a few times a week as her "lunch". It stunk up the entire office. She
had some idea it was "light". True, it didn't weigh much. LOL A bunch
of empty carbs and calories and who knows what the hell else.

It rather surprised me since she lived on a small farm, grew her own
vegetables, had some cows and chickens. I'm not saying she was out
there churning her own butter but I know she gathered fresh eggs. I was
surprised she thought microwave popcorn was "healthy".

Jill

On 2014-06-23 19:12, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> As I said in the past, there is no way to kill it. Even if I do not
> respond, they will. Just as how they are going on and on about how I
> claim I am a writer. Have you seen me post recently that I am a
> writer? I don't. I have written things in the past. I am not currently
> writing things except on newsgroups and in emails or notes to myself.

The fact remains that you have claimed to have been a writer. Were you
lying when you said that you are a writer or are you lying when you say
that you are not?
>

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:35:35 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 6/22/2014 10:53 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> "Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> They would require you to call the locksmith and get a new lock put
>>>>> in.
>>>>> Do
>>>>> you think they really have extra keys for all those thousands of
>>>>> mailboxes?
>>>>
>>>> You don't get to choose your locksmith, the USPS contracts with their
>>>> own locksmiths, cost's $15 to re-key for a lost key and I think $3 for
>>>> each key over two.
>>>>
>>> Absolutely right, Sheldon. If the USPS mailbox has a lock, you can get
>>> it
>>> re-keyed or the lock replaced. Apparently she's too busy figuring out
>>> how
>>> to spend money on ways to store potatoes and onions.
>>
>>Of COURSE I can get it rekeyed. But I don't want to have to go that
>>route.
>>It's expensive!
>>
>>And Sheldon is wrong about the post office contracting locksmiths. Maybe
>>in
>>his area they do. They sure as heck don't here!
>>
>>I just tried to search the USPS on this and there are no answers there.
>>
>>But I did find this and it says that what you have to do varies from area
>>to
>>area.
>>
>>http://www.city-data.com/forum/real-...ey-work-2.html
>>
>>I don't think anybody here lives in Bothell so they don't know how it
>>works
>>here. Just because you do something one way where you live, doesn't mean
>>it
>>is that way here.
>>
>>We have to compost food scraps. I gather that is not common elsewhere.
>
> WTF does composting have to do with the USPS? I already posted the
> lock info from the USPS... and since it's essentially Federal I think
> the rules are the same everywhere. I bet if you speak with your
> postmaster you'll be told what I already posted; $15 for rekeying and
> $3 for each key over two. Even though it's a cluster box it's serviced
> by the USPS, the rules regarding keys will be the same as for a PO
> Box... that cluster box is USPS property, you can't use any locksmith
> you choose, the locksmith needs to be authorized by the USPS.

It has nothing to do with it. Just saying that the rules here are not
necessarily the rules elsewhere. And I don't care what you posted. That's
*not* how it works here. Which was my point.

On 2014-06-23 19:27, Julie Bove wrote:

>>
>> I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>> I've known her for that matter, but she has said she was a writer in
>> the past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and
>> then claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies. Sad
>> really.
>
> That's exactly what happens. Thanks Cheri! They will glom onto
> something someone else said and then claim that I am the liar.


No Julie. We quoted YOU saying that you are a writer.

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> I had no idea working at KMart and then posting to Usenet makes
>>>>> someone
>>>>> a > writer. I have a number of copyrighted poems; I don't claim to be
>>>>> a >>> > writer.
>>>>
>>>> You can claim what you want. I don't say that I'm a writer now because
>>>> I
>>>> am not currently writing anything and haven't for several years.
>>>> People
>>>> here are claiming that I claim I am a writer and they are probably
>>>> getting that from some old website. For instance, the
>>>> alt.support.diabetes has my profile and they lifted some information I
>>>> had up on an old website that I had. I haven't had a website for years
>>>> either. I was never able to change that info. because the webmaster up
>>>> and disappeared and I don't know that anyone even knows who is running
>>>> the site. Or more likely it isn't being run but it just still up
>>>> there.
>>>> I've had other websites that I let go because I moved and had a
>>>> different
>>>> ISP and yet if you did a search of my name, you'd still see that
>>>> website
>>>> with very wrong information.
>>>
>>> You've made the claim of being a writer right here in rfc. More than
>>> once.
>>
>> I'm sure that I did. But I don't think it was recently. Because I
>> haven't written anything recently.
>
> You did. In April.

I don't remember what I said in April or who I replied to. I was also in
the hospital in April. So I wasn't doing a lot of posting then. Why do you
hang on my every word?

"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:06:07 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>>
>>> In article -
>>> september.org>, says...
>>> >
>>> > "Cheri" > wrote:
>>> > > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> > > ...
>>> > >
>>> > >> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>>> > >> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the
>>> > > years
>>> > > I've known her for that matter,
>>>
>>> Then you are either, very inattentive to her posts or have a poor
>>> memory, because she mentions it regularly here in rfc, in the present
>>> tense, and there are numerous examples this current year.
>>>
>>>
>>> but she has said she was a writer in the
>>> > > past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and
>>> > > then
>>> > > claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies.
>>>
>>> That is untrue, Cheri
>>> > >
>>> > > Cheri
>>> >
>>> > So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>>> > record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013,
>>> > and as
>>> > recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's
>>> > the
>>> > one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
>>> > GIYF.
>>>
>>> 2014 examples here
>>>
>>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se....cooking/Julie
>>> $20bove$20I$20am$20a$20writer$202014
>>>
>>>
>> You're going to have to do better than that. I sampled several
>> threads and all I found were people calling her a writer. I do
>> remember her saying something about it since the first of the year -
>> but the majority of mentions that I remember, just like Google, are
>> bullies throwing it in her face.
>
> You are a pro Julie bully. Knock it off. Cheri too.

What???

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
> wrote:

>"Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:54:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "barbie gee" > wrote in message
>>>>> crg.pbz...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so how come the Post Office doesn't provide replacement keys?
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And >>> Mill
>>>>> Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And you >>> expect
>>>>> them to keep that many duplicate keys?
>>>>
>>>> How can anyone be as stupid as you and still be breathing unassisted?
>>>>
>>>> You don't think your local post office can order the key in? I'll bet
>>>> theres a unique number on that key. Thats how it's done in Australia
>>>> and elsewhere. There must be well over a million PO boxes here, how do
>>>> you think they manage all the keys and locks, and replacements for the
>>>> same?
>>>
>>> Not to mention, there wouldn't be 33,000 unique, individual keys anyways
>>> because 1 out of every so many is a duplicate. Same with car keys, etc.
>>
>> I never said that.

LOL:

"Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And
Mill Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And
you expect them to keep that many duplicate keys?"

>I am just getting sick of this! I know what I was
>> told by the PO as to what I needed to do to get a new lock. Maybe they
>> lied to me. That was 10 years ago.

Now it comes out that this information is a decade old...

>Sheesh. And you people here are the
>> ones making the big deal of it! So we share a key. Why do *you* have a problem with it?
>
>I don't give a rat's ass if you share a key or not. Your reading
>comprehension isn't so great.

Indeed, and nor is her writing skills.

On 6/23/2014 7:14 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> And if you live with other people, sometimes *they* pick up your
>>> things and
>>> put them somewhere else. I have discovered where all my pens are going.
>>> Jazzy (cat) is taking them to play with. Jetta (cat) takes bobby pins.
>>
>> My ferret steals small things all the time and hides them in one of
>> her "forts." I just found an old comb the other day. It had been
>> missing for several months.
>
> Weird how they latch onto things like that. Maui would eat tape and
> packing peanuts. Jetta will fish Q Tips out of the trash so we have to
> make sure if we dispose of them, they go in there under something else.

When my cat Persia first came to live with me I had a small candy dish
on the table containing Brach's butterscotch candies. She'd stand on
her hind legs and gently remove one of the wrapped candies with her
teeth. She didn't eat them, she batted them around like hockey pucks.

Jill

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:11:11 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>Popcorn is not non nutritive. It's a whole grain. So... I ate what... 11
>grams of carb? Oh my! That's assuming your figures are correct. Target does
>list all of the calories and things for their food. I don't count fat as my
>diet is naturally low in fat and I've been told to eat more of it. Sadly I
>just don't digest it very well.
>
>I was wrong about there being sugar in the Icee but I didn't care for it so
>I won't be having another one.

It's not just the sugar or calories. Your knowledge on nutrition,
artificial flavours, preservatives, etc. is sadly lacking.

On 6/23/2014 7:58 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> This whole thing is getting freaking ridiculous. Can you people not
> drop things? I would hate to be in your real lives. You just go on and
> on about the tiniest little details. If I knew some of you people for
> real, I would avoid you like the plague! There would be no safe type of
> conversation with you.

I know you've said before that you feel the need to defend yourself when
you feel dissed, but the simple answer is to just stop responding to
that which you feel is irrelevant to you at this time. Whenever you
feel like writing "drop it" should be an indicator to you to be the
first to drop it. It will die off.

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl

On 2014-06-23 19:41, Julie Bove wrote:

>>> When she was a writer... was that before or after her career as a
>>> checkout clerk? I didn't twist her words when I referred to her
>>> complaint about her husband stopping for supper in the way home,
>>> something that she later denied saying, and also later said that I
>>> drag up things from the past. Maybe you should pay attention to her
>>> stories a little close to see how they change instead of compulsively
>>> replying to her posts and defending her. There are reasons why
>>> several people here comment about Julie's changing stories.
>>
>> Hardly. You're the one that replies to all posts about her like some
>> kind of stalker. Get a life.
>
> I don't know who wrote that. I never had a career as a checkout clerk.
> I did work for I Mart for 17 years. I was the garden shop manager, the
> layaway manager, a checkout supervisor, a fill in manager, but just
> briefly but mostly I did POS and Merchandising.

Point of Sale..... cash register???

>Yes, I ran a cash
> register sometimes. All of us did. Even management. I did start out
> as a cashier but that was only for two weeks. I was moved elsewhere
> after that and got a variety of promotions. I do dislike it when
> someone puts someone else down for being a cashier though. Somebody has
> to do it. And really, this person is sounding very much like my husband
> because that's how he likes to refer to me. He never could understand
> what I actually did there because it wasn't a simple job. I tried to
> explain it as did one of my coworkers. He didn't get it but I wouldn't
> expect someone who never worked retail to "get" it.

I have worked in retail.
I never put you down for being a cashier. I never put down cashiers. I
questioned the timing of your career as a writer.... because you are
denying having claimed to be a writer, and the only reason we thought
you had claimed to be a writer because YOU posted it here.

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> "Cheri" > wrote:
>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>>>>> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>>>> I've known her for that matter, but she has said she was a writer in
>>>> the
>>>> past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and then
>>>> claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies. Sad really.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>>> record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013, and
>>> > as
>>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's
>>> the
>>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
>>> GIYF.
>>
>> I don't think that I did or if I did, it was taken out of context.
>
> Not quite sure how anyone could take "I am a writer" out of context.
> Except
> you, of course.

I am not going to go back and look up what I said. It may well have been an
attack on my use of English or some such thing in which case I could have
easily replied that.

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:54:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "barbie gee" > wrote in message
>>>>> crg.pbz...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> so how come the Post Office doesn't provide replacement keys?
>>>>>
>>>>> Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And
>>>>> >>> Mill
>>>>> Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And you >>>
>>>>> expect
>>>>> them to keep that many duplicate keys?
>>>>
>>>> How can anyone be as stupid as you and still be breathing unassisted?
>>>>
>>>> You don't think your local post office can order the key in? I'll bet
>>>> theres a unique number on that key. Thats how it's done in Australia
>>>> and elsewhere. There must be well over a million PO boxes here, how do
>>>> you think they manage all the keys and locks, and replacements for the
>>>> same?
>>>
>>> Not to mention, there wouldn't be 33,000 unique, individual keys anyways
>>> because 1 out of every so many is a duplicate. Same with car keys, etc.
>>
>> I never said that. Just giving you an example that I'm not in some
>> podunk little town. I am just getting sick of this! I know what I was
>> told by the PO as to what I needed to do to get a new lock. Maybe they
>> lied to me. That was 10 years ago. Sheesh. And you people here are the
>> ones making the big deal of it! So we share a key. Why do *you* have a
>> problem with it?
>
> I don't give a rat's ass if you share a key or not. Your reading
> comprehension isn't so great.

Then why they hell are you going on about this? Just go to some other
thread and start talking food. But you're not here to talk food. Are you?

On 2014-06-23 19:47, Jeßus wrote:
>
>>> You've made the claim of being a writer right here in rfc. More than once.
>>
>> I'm sure that I did. But I don't think it was recently.
>
> You've said it more than once this year - and not in the past tense
> either.
>
>> Because I haven't written anything recently.
>
> We can't help that, you still said it, regardless.



I find it more than a little amusing that someone who has been caught
lying so many times figures that she can weasel her way out of being
accused of lying about something can simply deny having written it, even
when faced with the proof of her posts.

On 2014-06-23 19:50, jinx the minx wrote:
>
>>> You've made the claim of being a writer right here in rfc. More than once.
>>
>> I'm sure that I did. But I don't think it was recently. Because I
>> haven't written anything recently.
>
> You did. In April.
>
What's the matter with you? Don't you realize that in Julie's world she
can simply deny that she wrote something, even though we have seen the
evidence that she wrote it?

On 2014-06-23 20:01, Julie Bove wrote:

>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's the
>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
>> GIYF.
>
> I don't think that I did or if I did, it was taken out of context.


"I am a writer" is not taken out of context.

On 6/23/2014 8:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-06-23 19:41, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> I don't know who wrote that. I never had a career as a checkout clerk.
>> I did work for I Mart for 17 years. I was the garden shop manager, the
>> layaway manager, a checkout supervisor, a fill in manager, but just
>> briefly but mostly I did POS and Merchandising.
>
> Point of Sale..... cash register???

That's what it means in my world. "Merchandising" means
restocking/marking down/adding new items/stock as needed. I got to
dress mannequins and arrange displays when I worked in retail. That was
also considered merchandising.

Jill

On 2014-06-23 20:02, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se....cooking/Julie
>> $20bove$20I$20am$20a$20writer$202014
>
> I have no clue what that says. Only takes me to Google Groups.


N clue may be right. You could just admit that you have frequently
claimed to be a writer. Go to Google and search for "Jule Bove I am a
writer" and it will show that there are several posts that YOU made
where YOU claimed to be a writer.

On 6/23/2014 8:05 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> Thanks! I am sure that I probably did say it at some point here as I
> was writing when I was here in the past. I have also said that I was
> the writing assistant and the reading assistant for Angela's school.
> Also in the past. And when she was in the 4th grade, I was asked to
> write a story for her class. The teacher liked it so well, she asked if
> she could keep it for use in previous years.

Here's a good reason you shouldn't be a writer. You can't have someone
ask if they can keep a story and use it in *previous* years. Are you
sure you don't drink?

Jill

On 6/23/2014 8:02 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> t...
>> In article -
>> september.org>, says...
>>>
>>> "Cheri" > wrote:
>>> > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> > ...
>>> >
>>> >> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>>> >> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>>> > I've known her for that matter,
>>
>> Then you are either, very inattentive to her posts or have a poor
>> memory, because she mentions it regularly here in rfc, in the present
>> tense, and there are numerous examples this current year.
>>
>>
>> but she has said she was a writer in the
>>> > past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and
>>> then
>>> > claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies.
>>
>> That is untrue, Cheri
>>> >
>>> > Cheri
>>>
>>> So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>>> record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013,
>>> and as
>>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's
>>> the
>>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
>>> GIYF.
>>
>> 2014 examples here
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se....cooking/Julie
>> $20bove$20I$20am$20a$20writer$202014
>
> I have no clue what that says. Only takes me to Google Groups.

You don't know how to read Google Groups archives, do you?

April 20, 2014. The Lost a Lot of Food thread which you started... the
search turned up you saying "Especially since I am a writer". And in
March, 2014, in the Good Haul at Costco thread you said, "I am a
published writer". The proof is out there. Sorry, but you can't take
it back.

Jill

Dave Smith > wrote:
> On 2014-06-23 19:47, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>>>> You've made the claim of being a writer right here in rfc. More than once.
>>>
>>> I'm sure that I did. But I don't think it was recently.
>>
>> You've said it more than once this year - and not in the past tense
>> either.
>>
>>> Because I haven't written anything recently.
>>
>> We can't help that, you still said it, regardless.
>
>
>
> I find it more than a little amusing that someone who has been caught
> lying so many times figures that she can weasel her way out of being
> accused of lying about something can simply deny having written it, even
> when faced with the proof of her posts.

Unbelievable.
--
jinx the minx

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Jeßus > wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 04:54:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "barbie gee" > wrote in message
>>>>>> crg.pbz...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> so how come the Post Office doesn't provide replacement keys?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let me look up the population of Bothell... It's about 33,000. And >>>>> >>> Mill
>>>>>> Creek? About 19,000. Both cities are served by that PO. And you >>> >>>>> expect
>>>>>> them to keep that many duplicate keys?
>>>>>
>>>>> How can anyone be as stupid as you and still be breathing unassisted?
>>>>>
>>>>> You don't think your local post office can order the key in? I'll bet
>>>>> theres a unique number on that key. Thats how it's done in Australia
>>>>> and elsewhere. There must be well over a million PO boxes here, how do
>>>>> you think they manage all the keys and locks, and replacements for the
>>>>> same?
>>>>
>>>> Not to mention, there wouldn't be 33,000 unique, individual keys anyways
>>>> because 1 out of every so many is a duplicate. Same with car keys, etc.
>>>
>>> I never said that. Just giving you an example that I'm not in some
>>> podunk little town. I am just getting sick of this! I know what I was
>>> told by the PO as to what I needed to do to get a new lock. Maybe they
>>> lied to me. That was 10 years ago. Sheesh. And you people here are the
>>> ones making the big deal of it! So we share a key. Why do *you* have
>>> a >> problem with it?
>>
>> I don't give a rat's ass if you share a key or not. Your reading
>> comprehension isn't so great.
>
> Then why they hell are you going on about this? Just go to some other
> thread and start talking food. But you're not here to talk food. Are you?

I'm not going on and on about your key situation at all, you ignoramus. In
fact, I happen to know a lot about getting replacement keys for community
mailboxes as I just had to do it myself a couple years ago -- much more
recently than your 10 year old knowledge bank, but I certainly didn't rush
to comment at the beginning, did I? Btw, I had to order them from the post
office, not a locksmith. You're not exactly here talking about food
either. If I did, it most likely wouldn't be on one of your threads about
all the prepackaged foods you shove down your gullet and call healthy
because they contain "whole grains" because I don't eat that shit. I eat
foods you can't have, don't like, ad nauseam. OB food -- spinach and
prosciutto lasagna roll ups. With real cheese. They were absolutely
delicious.
--
jinx the minx

"Julie Bove" > wrote:
> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> "Cheri" > wrote:
>>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>>>>>> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>>>>> I've known her for that matter, but she has said she was a writer in >>>> the
>>>>> past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and then
>>>>> claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies. Sad really.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>>>> record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013, and >>> > as
>>>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's >>> the
>>>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof? >>> GIYF.
>>>
>>> I don't think that I did or if I did, it was taken out of context.
>>
>> Not quite sure how anyone could take "I am a writer" out of context. > Except
>> you, of course.
>
> I am not going to go back and look up what I said. It may well have been
> an attack on my use of English or some such thing in which case I could
> have easily replied that.

Since you're calling us the liars and the ones who are taking your comments
out of context perhaps you should take a walk down memory lane before
replying any further. You're only digging yourself in deeper by refuting
verifiable facts.
--
jinx the minx

Jeßus > wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:11:11 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>> Popcorn is not non nutritive. It's a whole grain. So... I ate what... 11
>> grams of carb? Oh my! That's assuming your figures are correct. Target does
>> list all of the calories and things for their food. I don't count fat as my
>> diet is naturally low in fat and I've been told to eat more of it. Sadly I
>> just don't digest it very well.
>>
>> I was wrong about there being sugar in the Icee but I didn't care for it so
>> I won't be having another one.
>
> It's not just the sugar or calories. Your knowledge on nutrition,
> artificial flavours, preservatives, etc. is sadly lacking.

But it's a whole grain!! LMAO
--
jinx the minx

On 2014-06-23 21:01, Julie Bove wrote:

>> I don't give a rat's ass if you share a key or not. Your reading
>> comprehension isn't so great.
>
> Then why they hell are you going on about this? Just go to some other
> thread and start talking food. But you're not here to talk food. Are you?


That's rich, considering that you were the one who had the tale about
the lost post office box keys.

On 6/23/2014 5:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:29:44 -0400, Gary wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd wager that more than half of the U.S. population
>>> requires a key to get into their mailbox.
>>
>> Not on the East coast.
>
> Never mind the 8.5 million people that live in New York City, which is
> almost 20x the population of your tiny little world.
>
> -sw
>

NYC is about 2.2% of the population and they don't all need keys. From
what I knew living in Philly and now in New England, This huge region
has very few locked boxes. I'd guess less that 15% of the population
needs a key.

Wager? Nah, I'd have to do more research, but I'd wager it is far less
than 50%

On 6/23/2014 8:08 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>> I'd wager that more than half of the U.S. population
>>> requires a key to get into their mailbox.
>>
>> Not on the East coast. It's very rare here except for apartments and
>> gated condo areas. Most all people here have NORMAL mailboxes out on
>> the street, no locks.
>
> Untrue. Military housing has that kind.

She said "most". Do you think that military housing is "most" of the
housing on the east coast?

"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
> Dave Smith > wrote:
>> On 2014-06-23 19:47, Jeßus wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You've made the claim of being a writer right here in rfc. More than
>>>>> once.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure that I did. But I don't think it was recently.
>>>
>>> You've said it more than once this year - and not in the past tense
>>> either.
>>>
>>>> Because I haven't written anything recently.
>>>
>>> We can't help that, you still said it, regardless.
>>
>>
>>
>> I find it more than a little amusing that someone who has been caught
>> lying so many times figures that she can weasel her way out of being
>> accused of lying about something can simply deny having written it, even
>> when faced with the proof of her posts.
>
> Unbelievable.

soon she will be running for office, and getting the votes.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:51:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "sf" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:06:07 +0100, Janet > wrote:
> >>
> >>> In article -
> >>> september.org>, says...
> >>> >
> >>> > "Cheri" > wrote:
> >>> > > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> >>> > > ...
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
> >>> > >> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the
> >>> > > years
> >>> > > I've known her for that matter,
> >>>
> >>> Then you are either, very inattentive to her posts or have a poor
> >>> memory, because she mentions it regularly here in rfc, in the present
> >>> tense, and there are numerous examples this current year.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> but she has said she was a writer in the
> >>> > > past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and
> >>> > > then
> >>> > > claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies.
> >>>
> >>> That is untrue, Cheri
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Cheri
> >>> >
> >>> > So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
> >>> > record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013,
> >>> > and as
> >>> > recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's
> >>> > the
> >>> > one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
> >>> > GIYF.
> >>>
> >>> 2014 examples here
> >>>
> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se....cooking/Julie
> >>> $20bove$20I$20am$20a$20writer$202014
> >>>
> >>>
> >> You're going to have to do better than that. I sampled several
> >> threads and all I found were people calling her a writer. I do
> >> remember her saying something about it since the first of the year -
> >> but the majority of mentions that I remember, just like Google, are
> >> bullies throwing it in her face.
> >
> > You are a pro Julie bully. Knock it off. Cheri too.
>
> What???

Hey I get frustrated and you know when I am. I also temporarily kill
file you when I've had it up to my eyeballs - but mainly they just
make this stuff up, such as claiming you made said it in the good food
thread. If they want to prove absolutely that you've said it
recently, then they can post specific message IDs because I'm not
wading through 1000's of Julie bashing posts containing key words they
searched for that were posted by someone else. Until then, they lie.
I do remember you said it sometime in 2014, but it was just a throw
away line - you didn't go on and on about it the way they are.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:11:33 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 6/23/2014 8:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> > On 2014-06-23 19:41, Julie Bove wrote:
> >
> >> I don't know who wrote that. I never had a career as a checkout clerk.
> >> I did work for I Mart for 17 years. I was the garden shop manager, the
> >> layaway manager, a checkout supervisor, a fill in manager, but just
> >> briefly but mostly I did POS and Merchandising.
> >
> > Point of Sale..... cash register???
>
> That's what it means in my world. "Merchandising" means
> restocking/marking down/adding new items/stock as needed. I got to
> dress mannequins and arrange displays when I worked in retail. That was
> also considered merchandising.
>
She said she did it for two weeks.


--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:51:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "sf" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:06:07 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> In article
>> >>> -
>> >>> september.org>, says...
>> >>> >
>> >>> > "Cheri" > wrote:
>> >>> > > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> >>> > > ...
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of
>> >>> > >> >
>> >>> > >> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the
>> >>> > > years
>> >>> > > I've known her for that matter,
>> >>>
>> >>> Then you are either, very inattentive to her posts or have a poor
>> >>> memory, because she mentions it regularly here in rfc, in the present
>> >>> tense, and there are numerous examples this current year.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> but she has said she was a writer in the
>> >>> > > past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words
>> >>> > > and
>> >>> > > then
>> >>> > > claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies.
>> >>>
>> >>> That is untrue, Cheri
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Cheri
>> >>> >
>> >>> > So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November
>> >>> > 2013,
>> >>> > and as
>> >>> > recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So
>> >>> > who's
>> >>> > the
>> >>> > one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further
>> >>> > proof?
>> >>> > GIYF.
>> >>>
>> >>> 2014 examples here
>> >>>
>> >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!se....cooking/Julie
>> >>> $20bove$20I$20am$20a$20writer$202014
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >> You're going to have to do better than that. I sampled several
>> >> threads and all I found were people calling her a writer. I do
>> >> remember her saying something about it since the first of the year -
>> >> but the majority of mentions that I remember, just like Google, are
>> >> bullies throwing it in her face.
>> >
>> > You are a pro Julie bully. Knock it off. Cheri too.
>>
>> What???
>
> Hey I get frustrated and you know when I am. I also temporarily kill
> file you when I've had it up to my eyeballs - but mainly they just
> make this stuff up, such as claiming you made said it in the good food
> thread. If they want to prove absolutely that you've said it
> recently, then they can post specific message IDs because I'm not
> wading through 1000's of Julie bashing posts containing key words they
> searched for that were posted by someone else. Until then, they lie.
> I do remember you said it sometime in 2014, but it was just a throw
> away line - you didn't go on and on about it the way they are.

she lies, they lie, and now you lie down with them. Why is anyone posting
this drivel?

What if Julie made a post and nobody replied?

On 2014-06-23 21:31, jinx the minx wrote:

>> I am not going to go back and look up what I said. It may well have been
>> an attack on my use of English or some such thing in which case I could
>> have easily replied that.
>
> Since you're calling us the liars and the ones who are taking your comments
> out of context perhaps you should take a walk down memory lane before
> replying any further. You're only digging yourself in deeper by refuting
> verifiable facts.
>


Not in Julie's world. She just has to deny that she wrote it and it
suddenly didn't ever appear in any of her posts. It doesn't matter that
we did web searches that turned up exactly what we remember her
posting... "I am a writer"

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:56:33 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

> What if Julie made a post and nobody replied?
>
What if someone made a post about Julie and she never contributed to
the thread? It would still go on for hundreds of posts. She doesn't
even need to participate. It just happened a few weeks ago.

--
I take life with a grain of salt, a slice of lemon and a shot of tequila

On 2014-06-23 21:27, jmcquown wrote:
ou don't know how to read Google Groups archives, do you?
>
> April 20, 2014. The Lost a Lot of Food thread which you started... the
> search turned up you saying "Especially since I am a writer". And in
> March, 2014, in the Good Haul at Costco thread you said, "I am a
> published writer". The proof is out there. Sorry, but you can't take
> it back.
>
Yes she can. She can just say that she didn't post it and that we are
twisting what she said or taking it out of context.

She doesn't seem to understand that when she is being confronted over
her lies and is lying about having said something, that she can't simply
deny it.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:56:33 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> > wrote:
>
>> What if Julie made a post and nobody replied?
>>
> What if someone made a post about Julie and she never contributed to
> the thread? It would still go on for hundreds of posts. She doesn't
> even need to participate. It just happened a few weeks ago.
>

I concur.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/23/2014 7:44 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> Yes, all that. Plus the artificial colours, flavours and preservatives
>> in the Icee thing, probably in the popcorn too.
>> I just can't eat shit like that.
>
> I'm sure the little bag of popcorn is as bad as microwave popcorn with
> that awful powdered fake butter. A woman I worked with used to make it a
> few times a week as her "lunch". It stunk up the entire office. She had
> some idea it was "light". True, it didn't weigh much. LOL A bunch of
> empty carbs and calories and who knows what the hell else.

No. It isn't microwave popcorn. Do you never get popcorn at the movies?
Pretty much the same stuff. Nothing powdered to it. It's popped in coconut
oil. No dairy. They checked the ingredients for me. I can't stand
standard microwave popcorn.
>
> It rather surprised me since she lived on a small farm, grew her own
> vegetables, had some cows and chickens. I'm not saying she was out there
> churning her own butter but I know she gathered fresh eggs. I was
> surprised she thought microwave popcorn was "healthy".

It can be. They do make some with just popcorn in it. Maybe salt. Nothing
else. That is totally healthy. You can also get it without transfats which
I did try but didn't like the mouth feel of it as it contained palm oil. I
pan pop at home but mine never tastes as good as what they make at Target.
It's always freshly popped.