"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:40:53 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>
>> > On 6/23/2014 5:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:29:44 -0400, Gary wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sqwertz wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I'd wager that more than half of the U.S. population
>> >>>> requires a key to get into their mailbox.
>> >>>
>> >>> Not on the East coast.
>> >>
>> >> Never mind the 8.5 million people that live in New York City, which is
>> >> almost 20x the population of your tiny little world.
>> >>
>> >
>> > NYC is about 2.2% of the population and they don't all need keys. From
>> > what I knew living in Philly and now in New England, This huge region
>> > has very few locked boxes. I'd guess less that 15% of the population
>> > needs a key.
>> >
>> > Wager? Nah, I'd have to do more research, but I'd wager it is far less
>> > than 50%
>>
>> I still stand by my 50%. All the people that live in apartments in
>> all the metropolitan parts of the country, I can't imagine that the
>> vast majority of inner city mailboxes don't lock. Add to that all the
>> urban and suburban communities that have communal mailboxes...
>>
>> 35% of people live in rental housing. Of that, 61% of them are
>> duplexes or larger. 18% of owner-occupied housing are condominiums.
>> That's almost 40% right there that live in multi-unit complexes - and
>> that's being conservative.
>>
>> Then add all the suburban and urban single housing family that many of
>> us have mentioned already have communal mailboxes, PO boxes, mail
>> slots in front doors...
>>
>> Or we could just look it up (duh) - who knew it would be in the
>> Internet?!?!). This report from the USPS says that 66% of adults
>> report that they get mail in unlocked mailboxes.
>>
>> Now add 18 years onto that 34% to that and think about all the reports
>> of check theft/fraud and the ever increasing incidence of identify
>> theft cases... and I don't think 50% is far off this day in age. I
>> might even go higher than 50%.
>
> You really do hate losing, don't you?
>
> Again, my whole point was neighborhoods with single family homes with
> yards. I've never seen a down the street lockbox for the street, etc.
> All neighborhoods here have individual mailboxs and no locks on them.

And I have seen many of them! So...

On 6/24/2014 7:15 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
(snip)
>
> OB Food: Edmonds (where I grew up) has food at school parties. For
> birthdays and such, they are allowed to bring in pencils or stickers.
> Or even extra recess. No food. Some parents are complaining.

OK, what's wrong with the statements ala bovine? Edmonds "has" (present
tense) food at school parties. But, pencils and stickers are allowed.
Then it states "No food". How illogical is this? Does not make sense
other than they're contradictory statements. More of the same idiocy.

Sky, who's rolling eyes again

On 2014-06-24 20:07, Julie Bove wrote:

>> IOW, making sure the right price tags/signs are on the shelves. Whew.
>> Glad we cleared that up!
>
> A lot more than that Jill. If I had to list out every single thing that
> we did in a day, it would read like a novel. I've already written
> enough. I retired from that job almost 20 years ago. No need to rehash
> it all.


Retired??? Wow. I had no idea that retail chains had such great benefits
that you could *retire*. My guess is that you quit or got fired. You
certainly did not retire with a pension.

On 6/24/2014 11:35 AM, jmcquown wrote:

> I cleaned the toilets and tubs and mopped the bathroom floor
> today. Guess what? No one cares, so I don't post about it.

We do care. Post the pictures to prove it.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-06-24 20:07, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>>> IOW, making sure the right price tags/signs are on the shelves. Whew.
>>> Glad we cleared that up!
>>
>> A lot more than that Jill. If I had to list out every single thing that
>> we did in a day, it would read like a novel. I've already written
>> enough. I retired from that job almost 20 years ago. No need to rehash
>> it all.


You've written enough? Interesting - are you a writer?

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:43:49 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Gary" > wrote in message ...
>> Sky wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep, that popcorn at Target is crap - and I know that first-hand, too.
>>> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic ;
>>
>> Not really.
>
>Here's what I don't get. If I don't like something... I get slammed here.
>If I like something... I get slammed here. I can't win!

If you haven't yet noticed the recurring patterns to your posts - and
the reactions to those posts, then it doesnt say much about your
powers of perception and reasoning.

And why is it that nobody else who posts here gets responses like you
do? Did that ever occur to you or even ask yourself why that is?

Nup, apparently. The only other scenario is that you're a form of
troll (and a damned good one at that).
Which is it?

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:52:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

>On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:43:49 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
>>
>> > Sky wrote:
>> >> Yep, that popcorn at Target is crap - and I know that first-hand, too.
>>
>> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic ;
>>
>> > Not really.
>>
>> Here's what I don't get. If I don't like something... I get slammed here.
>>
>> If I like something... I get slammed here. I can't win!
>
>Your only function here is to be made fun of. And you're pathetic enough to encourage it. Too bad your porky daughter is going to have to live with the collateral damage. Since you've been half-witted enough to positively identify her by name, image and location on the internet. What a great mom!

Do you think you could lay off describing her daughter that way? It's
not her fault she has such a mother and is learning all the wrong ways
to eat and live. She's still just a kid and has no control over her
situation. Just saying.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:17:49 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>> On 6/23/2014 8:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2014-06-23 19:41, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't know who wrote that. I never had a career as a checkout clerk.
>>>> I did work for I Mart for 17 years. I was the garden shop manager, the
>>>> layaway manager, a checkout supervisor, a fill in manager, but just
>>>> briefly but mostly I did POS and Merchandising.
>>>
>>> Point of Sale..... cash register???
>>
>> That's what it means in my world. "Merchandising" means
>> restocking/marking down/adding new items/stock as needed. I got to dress
>> mannequins and arrange displays when I worked in retail. That was also
>> considered merchandising.
>
>POS means being in charge of pricing.

LOL. Just LOL.
Point Of Sale.

>Making sure that we were making
>enough profit but also selling for a better price or the same price as our
>competitors.

How could you not know what the hell you're talking about if you
actually did such a job? Heh...

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:07:10 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>> On 6/24/2014 12:17 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 6/23/2014 8:58 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>> On 2014-06-23 19:41, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't know who wrote that. I never had a career as a checkout
>>>>>> clerk.
>>>>>> I did work for I Mart for 17 years. I was the garden shop manager,
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> layaway manager, a checkout supervisor, a fill in manager, but just
>>>>>> briefly but mostly I did POS and Merchandising.
>>>>>
>>>>> Point of Sale..... cash register???
>>>>
>>>> That's what it means in my world. "Merchandising" means
>>>> restocking/marking down/adding new items/stock as needed. I got to
>>>> dress mannequins and arrange displays when I worked in retail. That
>>>> was also considered merchandising.
>>>
>>> POS means being in charge of pricing.
>>
>> Bullshit. POS stands for Point of Sale. According to Wiki:
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Point_of_sale
>>
>> "A retail point of sale system typically includes a cash register (which
>> in recent times comprises a computer, monitor, cash drawer, receipt
>> printer, customer display and a barcode scanner) and the majority of
>> retail POS systems also include a debit/credit card reader."
>>
>> In other words, a cash register.
>
>That is indeed what it stands for. However, the job that I had entailed
>quite a bit of things.

Fvck... she's in extra good form today

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:23:25 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

>
>"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "Pico Rico" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> What if Julie made a post and nobody replied?
>>
>> Then the thread would look like your posts, that's what.
>>
>> Cheri
>
>
> good one!

You reckon? I thought it was all too predicable.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:56:41 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>Who wants to be a middle aged disabled woman with
>diabetes and food intolerances? Sheesh.

You do. You eat as though you do, anyway.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:13:48 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 6/23/2014 8:05 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> Thanks! I am sure that I probably did say it at some point here as I
>> was writing when I was here in the past. I have also said that I was
>> the writing assistant and the reading assistant for Angela's school.
>> Also in the past. And when she was in the 4th grade, I was asked to
>> write a story for her class. The teacher liked it so well, she asked if
>> she could keep it for use in previous years.
>
>Here's a good reason you shouldn't be a writer. You can't have someone
>ask if they can keep a story and use it in *previous* years. Are you
>sure you don't drink?

Prescription meds? I never thought of that, to be honest.
It might account for Julie's state of mind.

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 21:50:28 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> You don't know how to read Google Groups archives, do you?
>>
>> April 20, 2014. The Lost a Lot of Food thread which you started... the
>> search turned up you saying "Especially since I am a writer". And in
>> March, 2014, in the Good Haul at Costco thread you said, "I am a published
>> writer". The proof is out there. Sorry, but you can't take it back.
>
>I don't do Google Groups. And I am a published writer. That's no lie. I
>have had things published. So? I don't write now.

April 20, 2014 "Especially since I am a writer"

Her powers of denial or refusal to live in the real world, or whatever
it is, are astounding.

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 14:30:51 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >, says...
>>
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> >> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>> "Cheri" > wrote:
>> >>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> >>>> ...
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Indeed she has claimed here to be a writer. She writes a lot of >
>> >>>>> fiction.... like about being a writer and many other lies.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I've never seen her claim to be a writer *now* or in all of the years
>> >>>> I've known her for that matter, but she has said she was a writer in
>> >>>> the
>> >>>> past. The only *lies* I've seen is when people twist her words and then
>> >>>> claim that she said it. They're the ones telling the lies. Sad really.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Cheri
>> >>>
>> >>> So just how long ago do you qualify as being "in the past"? For the
>> >>> record, she made this claim in January 2013, again in November 2013, and
>> >>> > as
>> >>> recently as April 2014 in the "Lost a lot of food" thread. So who's
>> >>> the
>> >>> one twisting facts and telling lies now? Do you want further proof?
>> >>> GIYF.
>> >>
>> >> I don't think that I did or if I did, it was taken out of context.
>> >
>> > Not quite sure how anyone could take "I am a writer" out of context.
>> > Except
>> > you, of course.
>>
>> I am not going to go back and look up what I said. It may well have been an
>> attack on my use of English or some such thing in which case I could have
>> easily replied that.
>
> Are you reading this, Cheri? Because you own some apologies.

That won't ever happen.

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:04:03 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"Janet" > wrote in message
et...
>> In article >, says...
>>
>> All your posts are archived by google. The writer boasts you made are
>> in your posts so there is no ****ing point disputing it or Cheri
>> claiming she never saw those posts therefore the many who did are all
>> liars.
>
>I did not boast.

Check her out trying to evade the point, LOL
The tactical skills of a 10 y/o...

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:00:25 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>>
>>>> I find it more than a little amusing that someone who has been caught
>>>> lying so many times figures that she can weasel her way out of being
>>>> accused of lying about something can simply deny having written it, even
>>>> when faced with the proof of her posts.
>>>
>>> Unbelievable.
>>
>> soon she will be running for office, and getting the votes.
>
>I have no interest whatever in politics.

Yes, they seriously believe you should become a politician.
Really.

On 6/24/2014 8:17 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-06-24 20:07, Julie Bove wrote:

(snip)

>I retired from that job almost 20 years ago. No need to rehash
>> it all.
>
>
> Retired??? Wow. I had no idea that retail chains had such great benefits
> that you could *retire*. My guess is that you quit or got fired. You
> certainly did not retire with a pension.

Since when can anyone '*retire*' when aged 30-something?? Perhaps if
they're Bill Gates or Warren Buffet - not that either of those gentlemen
retired during their 30s!! More absurd fiction from the bove - yeah,
right, it retired "from that job almost 20 years ago" - NOT! Agreed -
it quit or was otherwise fired from said position and certainly without
a 'pension' at that age (30-something)!

Sky

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 23:53:45 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
> wrote:

>Jeßus > wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:12:54 -0700, "Julie Bove"
<bove-snip>
>>
>> I know you're trying to prolong this thread now with that statement.
>> Sounds good to me. One of us will find the posts eventually
>
>I already did, I just couldn't quote them from my phone. :-)

So I see

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 19:59:16 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 18:56:33 -0700, "Pico Rico"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> What if Julie made a post and nobody replied?
>>>
>> What if someone made a post about Julie and she never contributed to
>> the thread? It would still go on for hundreds of posts. She doesn't
>> even need to participate. It just happened a few weeks ago.
>>
>
>I concur.

Does it matter?

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:15:59 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>>>
>> Exactly! People would actually have to come up with something else to
>> talk about. They could try cooking and posting about food, but food
>> doesn't seem to be as popular a topic around here.
>>
>You're right. And even when *I* try to make a post about food, they turn it
>into something else. I also gather that in their world, everything is black
>and white. If you like something, you always have to like it. If you
>dislike something, you always have to dislike it. You can't ever try a new
>thing. If you do, then you are somehow lying or backpedaling. Everything
>is always the same. Nothing ever changes. I'm glad I don't live in that
>world.
>
>OB Food: Edmonds (where I grew up) has food at school parties. For
>birthdays and such, they are allowed to bring in pencils or stickers. Or
>even extra recess. No food.

'food at school party'... with no food. But extra recess is okay.
Understood.

>Some parents are complaining.

Sounds like a matter for the police.

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:11:52 -0500, Sky >
wrote:

>Key in the violin music! Oh, poor bovine, it needs more attention
>..... it can't get any better than this!

How did someone like Julie find their way onto Usenet?!?

On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:43:35 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> I make pan popped corn frequently at home. Nothing compares to home
>>>> made.
>>>> That stuff at Target is crap!
>>>
>>> Then you haven't tried it!
>>
>> I have. If that's your idea of great popcorn, you have no taste buds. It's
>> barely a step above the worst microwave popcorn.
>
>Wrong!

It figures you'd say that. How can a place like Target sell decent
popcorn made from real ingredients?

"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-06-24 20:07, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>>>> IOW, making sure the right price tags/signs are on the shelves. Whew.
>>>> Glad we cleared that up!
>>>
>>> A lot more than that Jill. If I had to list out every single thing that
>>> we did in a day, it would read like a novel. I've already written
>>> enough. I retired from that job almost 20 years ago. No need to rehash
>>> it all.
>
>
> You've written enough? Interesting - are you a writer?

Actually I'm a ****ed off face slapper. You're just lucky I can't see you.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 06:41:02 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
> > wrote:
>
>> sf > wrote:
>> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 05:30:34 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>> >>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>> >>> ...
>> >>>
>> >>>> I make pan popped corn frequently at home. Nothing compares to home
>> >>>> made.
>> >>>> That stuff at Target is crap!
>> >>>
>> >>> Then you haven't tried it!
>> >>
>> >> I have. If that's your idea of great popcorn, you have no taste buds.
>> >> It's
>> >> barely a step above the worst microwave popcorn.
>> >
>> > Really? Isn't it made in a machine that looks like one you'd find in
>> > a movie theater?
>>
>>
>> Yes, but that doesn't make it good unless you like chemical coated
>> popcorn.
>> Nothing beats fresh corn from the stove with a little real butter and
>> salt. Butter flavored coconut oil is no enhancement.
>
> I always see fresh popcorn popping in the machine. Don't movie
> theaters put real butter on their popcorn? Why wouldn't Target?

What? No. No dairy in either. If there was, I couldn't eat it. Some
theaters do have a real butter topping that you can get, or so I have read.
But ours here use a "buttery topping", if you want that in addition.
Standard popcorn machine popcorn is popped in coconut oil with artificial
butter flavoring and also have an artificial butter flavored popcorn salt.
If you buy those things as a consumer, and dairy is an issue, you do have to
check. Some do contain dairy. But most of the commercially popped stuff
does not.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
> wrote:
>
>> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
>>
> Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.

That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2014 22:43:35 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"jinx the minx" > wrote in message
...
>>> "Julie Bove" > wrote:
>>>> "jinx the minx" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> I make pan popped corn frequently at home. Nothing compares to home
>>>>> made.
>>>>> That stuff at Target is crap!
>>>>
>>>> Then you haven't tried it!
>>>
>>> I have. If that's your idea of great popcorn, you have no taste buds.
>>> It's
>>> barely a step above the worst microwave popcorn.
>>
>>Wrong!
>
> I don't want any chemical corn. Microwaved is awful. Movie corn is
> disgusting. Pan popped in oyl is morbid. The best popcorn is air
> popped, drizzled with *real butter*.

If that's what you like. I'm like Alton Brown. No butter please!

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:26:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > I don't want any chemical corn. Microwaved is awful. Movie corn is
> > disgusting. Pan popped in oyl is morbid. The best popcorn is air
> > popped, drizzled with *real butter*.
>
> If that's what you like. I'm like Alton Brown. No butter please!

Ewww! Air popped popcorn is nasty. There's a reason why they call
those Styrofoam packing peanuts "popcorn".

--
All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:25:01 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
> >>
> > Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.
>
> That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.

What's the tiny stuff?

--
All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:25:01 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
>> >>
>> > Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.
>>
>> That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.
>
> What's the tiny stuff?
>
This is what I have now.

http://www.americanspice.com/tiny-sweet-popcorn/

But this is what I bought befo

http://www.amazon.com/Tiny-But-Might...s=tiny+popcorn

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:26:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > I don't want any chemical corn. Microwaved is awful. Movie corn is
>> > disgusting. Pan popped in oyl is morbid. The best popcorn is air
>> > popped, drizzled with *real butter*.
>>
>> If that's what you like. I'm like Alton Brown. No butter please!
>
> Ewww! Air popped popcorn is nasty. There's a reason why they call
> those Styrofoam packing peanuts "popcorn".
>
I have eaten air popped. I wouldn't turn it down but it's pretty akin to
what you said. If I eat it like that, it has to be just that. Nothing
added. Try to add butter or something butter flavored to that and it just
sucks up the oil but only in some spots. Not good. And salt won't stick
unless there is oil. I used to spray it with Weight Watcher's buttery spray
until it dawned on me that I was using about a half a can of that each time.
No thanks.

Pan popped in oil for me.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 15:52:36 -0700 (PDT), wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:43:49 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>> > Sky wrote:
>>> >> Yep, that popcorn at Target is crap - and I know that first-hand,
>>> >> too.
>>>
>>> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic ;
>>>
>>> > Not really.
>>>
>>> Here's what I don't get. If I don't like something... I get slammed
>>> here.
>>>
>>> If I like something... I get slammed here. I can't win!
>>
>>Your only function here is to be made fun of. And you're pathetic enough
>>to encourage it. Too bad your porky daughter is going to have to live with
>>the collateral damage. Since you've been half-witted enough to positively
>>identify her by name, image and location on the internet. What a great
>>mom!
>
> Do you think you could lay off describing her daughter that way? It's
> not her fault she has such a mother and is learning all the wrong ways
> to eat and live. She's still just a kid and has no control over her
> situation. Just saying.

I just hope she never gets curious and reads any of this stuff.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 23:05:30 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 22:25:01 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "sf" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
> >> >>
> >> > Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.
> >>
> >> That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.
> >
> > What's the tiny stuff?
> >
> This is what I have now.
>
> http://www.americanspice.com/tiny-sweet-popcorn/
>
> But this is what I bought befo
>
> http://www.amazon.com/Tiny-But-Might...s=tiny+popcorn

I'm not a popcorn gourmet and you know I don't internet shop for food.
Orville's is good enough for me.

--
All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

On 2014-06-24 10:52 PM, Jeßus wrote:

>>
>> I don't do Google Groups. And I am a published writer. That's no lie. I
>> have had things published. So? I don't write now.
>
> April 20, 2014 "Especially since I am a writer"
>
> Her powers of denial or refusal to live in the real world, or whatever
> it is, are astounding.
>



I have come to expect little more than idiocy. What disappoints me is
the people here who defend her. It is hard enough that they cannot see
through her themselves, but they are in denial about the proof that
others have presented here. Everyone where with a brain acknowledges
that she has claimed to be a writer, but there are several here who have
denied that she ever said it.

On 2014-06-24 11:12 PM, Sky wrote:
snip)
>
>> I retired from that job almost 20 years ago. No need to rehash
>>> it all.
>>
>>
>> Retired??? Wow. I had no idea that retail chains had such great benefits
>> that you could *retire*. My guess is that you quit or got fired. You
>> certainly did not retire with a pension.
>
> Since when can anyone '*retire*' when aged 30-something?? Perhaps if
> they're Bill Gates or Warren Buffet - not that either of those gentlemen
> retired during their 30s!! More absurd fiction from the bove - yeah,
> right, it retired "from that job almost 20 years ago" - NOT! Agreed -
> it quit or was otherwise fired from said position and certainly without
> a 'pension' at that age (30-something)!
>
I don't know how old Julie is exactly. She had referred to things in her
childhood, having a teenage daughter and other things that lead me to
expect that she is is middle aged. It would be hard enough to *retire*
from a retail job in one's 60s. If she left in her 30s that would be
quitting or being fired. If she had gone on to another line of work we
probably would have heard about it. But what the heck.... we can't
believe much that Julie says.

Sharon wrote:
>
> "Gary" wrote in message ...
>
> > "Sharon" > wrote:
>
> > > Now there is a cull
> > > every so often and the local first nation people are allowed a quota to
> > > keep the dear population at a level where they don't starve or wreck
> > > residents' landscaping and gardens.
>
> There's a big difference between harvesting deer so there aren't too
> many and starve in the winter vs harvesting them because they wreck
> your landscaping and gardens. lol!
>
> I've been watching some hunting shows lately. As soon as they kill
> some animal, they spout the "politically correct" comments. "I
> respect this animal, etc." IMO, if you really respected the animal,
> you wouldn't have killed it in the first place. Give me a break! Such
> BS!
>
> G.
>
> That's true. Part of the issue was the local Carolinian forest that was
> being decimated from the deer population being too large. The culled deer
> were consumed by the local First Nation's. The vegetation that was feeding
> the deer was greatly diminished. I realize that residential areas have
> encroached on the wildlife habitat, but it's a fact and culling is a way of
> keeping a healthy deer population in the park. Sharon

Not only that but we have killed off many of the natural predators in
certain areas. Like wolves. I'm not against hunting at all. I don't
want to do it, but seriously someone needs to do it.

When I was a teenager, I hunted for a few years but... Once I shot and
killed an animal, I didn't go into this silly rant about..... I honor
you Mr.Rabbit. Thank you for giving up your life so I can have a snack
tonight....etc.

G.

Year 2030. Alien kills me then immediately says, "I thank you and
honor you Gary for giving up your life so my family can eat fried
gary-nuggets for dinner."

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
> >>
> > Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.
>
> That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.

Does anybody here realize that GMO is not necessarily a bad thing?
It's new science. Maybe a bit scary to all you oldtimers but you need
to look at the benefit possibilities of genetic engineering. Don't
throw out the baby with the bathwater.

ggg.

In article >,
says...

> How did someone like Julie find their way onto Usenet?!?

I reckon Mr Bove brought her here at night and dumped her without a
map or GPS. Now she's trapped here and can't find her way back to the
real world.

Janet UK

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014 14:26:20 -0400, Gary > wrote:

> Julie Bove wrote:
> >
> > "sf" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 02:53:23 -0500, Sky >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> The stuff made in a covered pot on the stove at home is fantastic
> > >>
> > > Only if it's the right brand. I hate all of them except Orville's.
> >
> > That's GMO. I am currently eating the tiny stuff. Very tender.
>
> Does anybody here realize that GMO is not necessarily a bad thing?
> It's new science. Maybe a bit scary to all you oldtimers but you need
> to look at the benefit possibilities of genetic engineering. Don't
> throw out the baby with the bathwater.
>
Do you know what gmo plants we're talking about? They're food plants
that are bred survive when their fields are sprayed with roundup.
Mother nature's weeds have already figured out how to survive roundup,
so now chemical companies (monsanto, bayer etc) have to come up with
even stronger herbicides to spray on crops. You might enjoy eating
chemical laden food, but the rest of us would rather not.



--
All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt.

On 2014-06-25 3:07 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>
>> How did someone like Julie find their way onto Usenet?!?
>
> I reckon Mr Bove brought her here at night and dumped her without a
> map or GPS. Now she's trapped here and can't find her way back to the
> real world.
>

Imagine the peace and quiet he enjoys while she in online for hours and
hours. Can you imagine the sort of real life conversations he would have
to try to endure.

Hear you on that. I was borned shortly after the big war. We ate only oleo till prob ten years ago. Now we eat only butter or sometimes stoop to a butter olive oil combo spread. Oleo do not appear to be healthy for folks. It came about when the lie about saturated fats got discovered.