Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. The
world's largest chicken breeder has discovered that a key breed of rooster has a genetic issue that is reducing its fertility, and that's raising prices for poultry even as beef and pork prices hit record highs. The breed, Aviagen Group's standard Ross male, is sire through its offspring to as much as 25 percent of the nation's chickens raised for slaughter, said Aviagen spokeswoman Marla Robinson. Sanderson Farms, the third-largest U.S. poultry producer and one of Aviagen's largest customers, said it and Aviagen systematically ruled out other possible causes for a decline in fertility before determining a genetic issue was at the root of the problem. The issue is hitting an industry that is already suffering from a short supply of breeder birds. A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/9/2014 4:24 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. (snippage) > A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found > that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when > the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. > In other words, when the rooster gets fat he's too lazy to have sex. Jill <ducking and running> |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/9/2014 4:32 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 7/9/2014 4:24 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote: >> Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. > (snippage) >> A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found >> that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when >> the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. >> > In other words, when the rooster gets fat he's too lazy to have sex. > > Jill <ducking and running> Fat guy don't get laid as often as skinny guys IRL. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:24:39 -0600, Janet Bostwick
> wrote: >Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. The >world's largest chicken breeder has discovered that a key breed of >rooster has a genetic issue that is reducing its fertility, and that's >raising prices for poultry even as beef and pork prices hit record >highs. The breed, Aviagen Group's standard Ross male, is sire through >its offspring to as much as 25 percent of the nation's chickens raised >for slaughter, said Aviagen spokeswoman Marla Robinson. Sanderson >Farms, the third-largest U.S. poultry producer and one of Aviagen's >largest customers, said it and Aviagen systematically ruled out other >possible causes for a decline in fertility before determining a >genetic issue was at the root of the problem. The issue is hitting an >industry that is already suffering from a short supply of breeder >birds. A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found >that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when >the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. Factory farming. No sympathy from me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-07-09, Jeßus > wrote:
> Factory farming. No sympathy from me. Bingo! They've bred the birds to have such a huge chest (breast meat), they can only walk a few steps and then gotta plop down to rest. Not what I'd call sexual athletes or even healthy meat. I'm not trying to be a snob or some kinda animal rights freak, but I'll pay the exorbitant prices for non "factory-farming" chicken. I think good food should be encouraged. I think it tastes better. Food will never get better if we keep buying the crap food. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:07:07 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> On 7/9/2014 4:32 PM, jmcquown wrote: > > On 7/9/2014 4:24 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote: > >> Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. > > (snippage) > >> A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found > >> that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when > >> the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. > >> > > In other words, when the rooster gets fat he's too lazy to have sex. > > > > Jill <ducking and running> > > Fat guy don't get laid as often as skinny guys IRL. I think there's a physical problem too. Think about it for a moment. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2014 00:39:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:
> Food will never get better if we keep buying the crap food. ![]() That's for sure. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/9/2014 4:24 PM, Janet Bostwick wrote:
> Apparently, fat roosters aren't very good at making chicks. The > world's largest chicken breeder has discovered that a key breed of > rooster has a genetic issue that is reducing its fertility, and that's > raising prices for poultry even as beef and pork prices hit record > highs. The breed, Aviagen Group's standard Ross male, is sire through > its offspring to as much as 25 percent of the nation's chickens raised > for slaughter, said Aviagen spokeswoman Marla Robinson. Sanderson > Farms, the third-largest U.S. poultry producer and one of Aviagen's > largest customers, said it and Aviagen systematically ruled out other > possible causes for a decline in fertility before determining a > genetic issue was at the root of the problem. The issue is hitting an > industry that is already suffering from a short supply of breeder > birds. A team of scientists from Aviagen studied the issue and found > that the breed's genetics made it sensitive to being overfed, and when > the bird got big, he didn't breed as much. > All the more reason to portion your meat to a reasonable size. I've been finding lately that if I grill my protein, and eat it by itself in the kitchen without a fancy presentation, I eat less. I plate my sides though. I've been grilling a lot more lately now that I have a decent grill that cooks my food exactly how I like it. I have to wonder what other traits he is passing on to his limited offspring, such as fattier chicks? Chicken does seem to be fattier with tougher gristle. -- ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶ Cheryl |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:07:07 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: >> Fat guy don't get laid as often as skinny guys IRL. > > I think there's a physical problem too. Think about it for a moment. I'd rather not. ![]() Cheri |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Quote:
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe it's due to competition from drug companies. I just had injections
into the center of both my knees of a compound extracted from the coxcombs of roosters (Synvisc/hyaluronan)... -- Larry |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 10:34:45 PM UTC-7, Cheri wrote:
> "sf" > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:07:07 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: > > > > >> Fat guy don't get laid as often as skinny guys IRL. > > > I think there's a physical problem too. Think about it for a moment. > > I'd rather not. ![]() > Remember Sue Johanson, the elderly sexpert? A viewer once asked her about coping with his girlfriend's panniculus -- a fancy term for drooping paunch -- which completely covered her genitalia. I will stop right here. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:34:19 -0400, pltrgyst > wrote:
> Maybe it's due to competition from drug companies. I just had injections > into the center of both my knees of a compound extracted from the > coxcombs of roosters (Synvisc/hyaluronan)... > Don't mess around, it's an expensive process but stem cells (Mesenchymal Stem Cells) do work to repair knees. From what I understand, they are taken from your own body marrow. -- All you need is love. But a little chocolate now and then doesn't hurt. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/9/2014 10:35 PM, Gorio wrote:
> I buy Amish > chickens. Not as big, but they're real chickens. > I never asked the religious background of the chickens I buy. Thanks for the tip, I'm going to ask next time. Are they near the Jewish kosher ones? Hmm, chickens with beards. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/10/2014 2:44 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 7/9/2014 10:35 PM, Gorio wrote: > >> I buy Amish >> chickens. Not as big, but they're real chickens. >> > > I never asked the religious background of the chickens I buy. Thanks > for the tip, I'm going to ask next time. Are they near the Jewish kosher > ones? > > Hmm, chickens with beards. > My favorite kebab place is Halal (Muslim regulations) but, tho similar, it seems to differ from Kosher in that shrimps are in. I actually met the professor at the U of NC who developed the multipurpose chicken some years ago. As it grows, it first becomes suitable for Cornish game hens, then grows into a small roaster, then further into an egg layer. My Japanese assistant was much amused by the thought of a "Chicken Professor" and she talked about him for months afterwards. Actually, Chisuko was, and probably still is, a bit iconoclastic. Here is is her view of the Cherry Blossom festival; an unconscious haiku. The *men* sit under the cherry trees And get very drunk. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jul 2014 00:39:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>On 2014-07-09, Jeßus > wrote: > >> Factory farming. No sympathy from me. > >Bingo! > >They've bred the birds to have such a huge chest (breast meat), they >can only walk a few steps and then gotta plop down to rest. Not what >I'd call sexual athletes or even healthy meat. No, it's certainly not healthy (unless you're dying from malnutrition). Have you seen the burns on the skin of factory chicken raised in the U.S? Its from the birds having to stand and lay in faeces... which is then lovingly bleached for presentation. mmm... yum: http://www.aspca.org/sites/default/f...?itok=gNjIiWFs >I'm not trying to be a snob or some kinda animal rights freak, Of course not, it's a shame you feel you have to defend yourself like that. >but I'll pay the exorbitant prices for non "factory-farming" chicken. >I think good food should be encouraged. I think it tastes better. It is, and if you can't afford to buy quality meat - buy something else. >Food will never get better if we keep buying the crap food. ![]() If everyone voted with their wallets and purses... they'd be history. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Pawlowski > wrote in
: > On 7/9/2014 10:35 PM, Gorio wrote: > >> I buy Amish >> chickens. Not as big, but they're real chickens. >> > > I never asked the religious background of the chickens I buy. Thanks > for the tip, I'm going to ask next time. Are they near the Jewish kosher > ones? > > Hmm, chickens with beards. > Only the married roosters. -- "Things would be a lot nicer if antique people were valued as highly as antique furniture!" Anon |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Choc horror! Cocoa shortage, rising prices threaten chocolate bars | General Cooking | |||
Containers that seem to breed! | General Cooking | |||
Chicken prices | Diabetic | |||
Food Prices Rising | General Cooking | |||
you can tell if a racer is gay by whether he has an effiminate breed of dog | General Cooking |