After a brief period of few posts and even some posts that seemed to make a
bit of sense, she is back to her old self.

Watch yourselves! There are plenty of other threads.

On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
> After a brief period of few posts

Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>> After a brief period of few posts
>
> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>
> Jill

surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".

On 8/23/2014 10:06 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>
>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>
>> Jill
>
> surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>
>
Yep. I think we can all find and read her posts without you announcing
them.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 8/23/2014 10:06 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>
>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>>
>>
> Yep. I think we can all find and read her posts without you announcing
> them.
>
> Jill

you are an idiot.

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:06:07 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:

>
>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>
>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>
>> Jill
>
>surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>

Call it what you want, but it is rabble rousing like a 7th grade girl.
Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
find fault with anyone. Your post served no useful purpose. Are you
an adult?

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:06:07 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>
>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>>surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>>
>
> Call it what you want, but it is rabble rousing like a 7th grade girl.
> Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
> find fault with anyone. Your post served no useful purpose. Are you
> an adult?

yes, and I was pointing out, as I have before, exactly what you have pointed
out.

I say again: Watch yourselves, there are plenty of other threads.

"Pico Rico" > wrote in message
...

> I say again: Watch yourselves, there are plenty of other threads.

Well then, that should keep YOU busy for a long time.

Cheri

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 21:44:10 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> wrote:



>>
>> Call it what you want, but it is rabble rousing like a 7th grade girl.
>> Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
>> find fault with anyone. Your post served no useful purpose. Are you
>> an adult?
>
>yes, and I was pointing out, as I have before, exactly what you have pointed
>out.
>
>I say again: Watch yourselves, there are plenty of other threads.
>

Bullshit. You are bringing it to everyone's attention like a 7 th
grade girl. We don't need your warning or any post calling attention
to anyone. It was self serving on your part. Maybe you just want
attention?

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:27:15 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
>find fault with anyone.

Really? Care to cite some examples where the posters in question find
fault with everyone?

On 8/23/2014 11:21 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 8/23/2014 10:06 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>>
>>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>>>
>>>
>> Yep. I think we can all find and read her posts without you announcing
>> them.
>>
>> Jill
>
> you are an idiot.
>
>
You are {plonk}

On 8/24/2014 12:27 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:06:07 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>
>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>>
>
> Call it what you want, but it is rabble rousing like a 7th grade girl.
> Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
> find fault with anyone. Your post served no useful purpose. Are you
> an adult?
>

LOL If Blake was still alive I'd be asking him when does school start?
The kidlets need something else to do.

Jill

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:57:06 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:27:15 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>>Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
>>find fault with anyone.
>
>Really? Care to cite some examples where the posters in question find
>fault with everyone?


Did I say everyone? Reading comprehension problems?

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 19:06:07 -0700, "Pico Rico"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>
>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>>surely you cannot have read my post as "cheerleading".
>>
>
> Call it what you want, but it is rabble rousing like a 7th grade girl.
> Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
> find fault with anyone. Your post served no useful purpose. Are you
> an adult?

'Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors ' Exactly right!

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Jeßus wrote:
>Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>
>>Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
>>find fault with anyone.
>
>Really? Care to cite some examples where the posters in question find
>fault with everyone?

Um, there's a huge difference between "anyone" and "everyone*, you
uneducated JeSus pinhead!

On 8/23/2014 6:21 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>> After a brief period of few posts
>
> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>
> Jill

But really we ALL do...

"Mayo" > wrote in message ...
> On 8/23/2014 6:21 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>
>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>
>> Jill
>
> But really we ALL do...

Yep.. Also we all need engraved invitations. I mean those things are
saweet!



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On 8/24/2014 2:57 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Mayo" > wrote in message ...
>> On 8/23/2014 6:21 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 8/23/2014 12:56 PM, Pico Rico wrote:
>>>> After a brief period of few posts
>>>
>>> Cut it out, please. She doesn't need a cheerleader.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> But really we ALL do...
>
> Yep.. Also we all need engraved invitations. I mean those things are
> saweet!

I'll get working on the calligraphy straight away...

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 08:11:11 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 17:57:06 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 00:27:15 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>>Most of the posts in a Julie thread are by detractors that like to
>>>find fault with anyone.
>>
>>Really? Care to cite some examples where the posters in question find
>>fault with everyone?
>
>
>Did I say everyone?

Ha, I thought you'd understand why I substituted the word, but no.
Using 'anyone' in the above sentence of mine doesnt sound right to me.

>Reading comprehension problems?

Nope, not in this case at least.