http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/0...d-third-breast

Next, a man with three buttocks.

Oh and what the hell is it with coffee cans? They give you this tiny little
tab to pull the damn seal off.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help, and the "doctor" who
Did this should have his license taken away.

N.

On 9/23/2014 3:57 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help, and the "doctor" who
> Did this should have his license taken away.
>
> N.
>
You saw WHAT? Nancy2, Is it really too much to ask you to learn how to
quote? I have no clue what you're talking about or who you're replying
to. I'm pretty sure there are other people on RFC don't, either.

Jill

Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is such an irritant, just don't try to read my
posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.

When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only post was the original one. I thought
it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.

N.

On 2014-09-23 3:57 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help, and the "doctor" who
> Did this should have his license taken away.
>
>

LOL about the article about her having it done to make herself
unattractive to men. Yeah.... by having an extra breast. Then she had
the video where she talked inarticulately about doing what has to be
done to get a job. The woman was a "massage therapist". She probably
works at a place like the rub and tug next to a strip joint down the
highway. I hope it will mean a happy ending for her.

On 9/23/2014 12:21 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
> Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
> up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is such an irritant, just don't try to read my
> posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.
>
> When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only post was the original one. I thought
> it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.
>
> N.
>

You could try switching to desktop mode in Google Groups. This will
allow you to quote. Posting in desktop mode is somewhat workable on a
big iPad, pretty hard if you have a mini. Hopefully, you have the eyes
and the fingers for the task. :-)

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>
> I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help,
> and the "doctor" who
> Did this should have his license taken away.
>
> N.

What?

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/23/2014 3:57 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>> I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help,
>> and the "doctor" who
>> Did this should have his license taken away.
>>
>> N.
>>
> You saw WHAT? Nancy2, Is it really too much to ask you to learn how to
> quote? I have no clue what you're talking about or who you're replying
> to. I'm pretty sure there are other people on RFC don't, either.
>
> Jill

Me, me, me!

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
> Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the
> iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
> up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is such
> an irritant, just don't try to read my
> posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.
>
> When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only post
> was the original one. I thought
> it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.
>
> N.

What you said made no sense.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the
>> iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
>> up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is
>> such an irritant, just don't try to read my
>> posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.
>>
>> When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only post
>> was the original one. I thought
>> it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.
>>
>> N.

Jill has me killfied. She expects everyone to know that. She demands that
she be accomodatd on a case by case basis as towich exceptions she wants and
under what circumstances.

Sure defeats the purpose of a killfile.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>
> I saw that. There are other ways to stop dating. She needs psych help,
> and the "doctor" who
> Did this should have his license taken away.

She's quite hot but no too bright. A third breast is just that much better
to most men. I don't think she gets that.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On 9/23/2014 7:45 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the
>> iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
>> up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is
>> such an irritant, just don't try to read my
>> posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.
>>
>> When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only
>> post was the original one. I thought
>> it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.
>>
>> N.
>
> What you said made no sense.

I am agreeing with you, Julie. I have no idea what Nancy2 is talking
about. I'm terriby sorry she can't quote using an iPad. Even when I
was posting via Windows Mail I figured out how to quote. I could do it
using Google, too.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 9/23/2014 7:45 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Nancy2" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Jill, I am sorry your knickers are in a twist. I cannot quote on the
>>> iPad. If I use my laptop, all replies end
>>> up under the first post made, not the one I am replying to. If it is
>>> such an irritant, just don't try to read my
>>> posts. I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.
>>>
>>> When I replied to the post about surgery for three breasts, the only
>>> post was the original one. I thought
>>> it should be obvious what I was talking about. Sorry.
>>>
>>> N.
>>
>> What you said made no sense.
>
> I am agreeing with you, Julie. I have no idea what Nancy2 is talking
> about. I'm terriby sorry she can't quote using an iPad. Even when I was
> posting via Windows Mail I figured out how to quote. I could do it using
> Google, too.

This is why I did not come here when I was down with my foot. Too hard to
do anything here with an Ipad.

On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:21:47 PM UTC-7, Dave Smith wrote:

> LOL about the article about her having it done to make herself
> unattractive to men. Yeah.... by having an extra breast.

This provoked a memory. Apparently it was the Al Bundy character on
Married With Children whose dream woman had three breasts -- the
third one on the back, "for dancing."

> wrote in message
...
> On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 3:21:47 PM UTC-7, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> LOL about the article about her having it done to make herself
>> unattractive to men. Yeah.... by having an extra breast.
>
> This provoked a memory. Apparently it was the Al Bundy character on
> Married With Children whose dream woman had three breasts -- the
> third one on the back, "for dancing."

Benny Hill beat them to that one by ten years.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

Ds1, thanks, I have been told to use desktop mode before, but that format is super irritating to me.
Besides, the last time I switched, in another group, when I saw my post, no quoted material
showed up unless I clicked on "show quoted material." Maybe that is an iPad quirk.

I try to say enough of what I am replying to. If people would read posts in order, like in this thread,
my response to the first post made by Paul should have made obvious what I was replying to.
Paul gave a link. If these people complaining had read that first post and followed the link, they
would have known what I meant when I said, "I saw that."

Anyway, I am old and cranky, so just don't read my posts. All the quoting worked fine on my laptop,
at least, in the old days. Now it doesn't.

N.

To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I would post a link to the article, but
whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an email.)

N.

On 2014-09-24 9:12 AM, Nancy2 wrote:

> I try to say enough of what I am replying to. If people would read posts in order, like in this thread,
> my response to the first post made by Paul should have made obvious what I was replying to.
> Paul gave a link. If these people complaining had read that first post and followed the link, they
> would have known what I meant when I said, "I saw that."
>
> Anyway, I am old and cranky, so just don't read my posts. All the quoting worked fine on my laptop,
> at least, in the old days. Now it doesn't.
>
When I saw posts that appeared to be replies but without the ""in the
subject line and without quoted text I changed my viewing options to
sort by thread and had no problem finding the OP.

On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I would post a link to the article, but
> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an email.)
>
>

I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.

In article >,
says...
>
> Ds1, thanks, I have been told to use desktop mode before, but that format is super irritating to me.

It's more than irritating to the entire group, when you provide no
clue what you're talking about.

> I try to say enough of what I am replying to. If people would read posts in order, like in this thread,

DUH!! There is no fixed order. People read posts in the order their
server delivers them from others (which varies enormously ) and/or in
the order they set for themselves (oldest first, or newest first). If
they use a killfile that also affects which posts they see.


So no posters are likely to see or read any thread in the same order
you do. That's the nature of usenet, it is NOT like email or a
webforum.

> my response to the first post made by Paul should have made obvious what I was replying to.

Not at all, because there's no way for anybody else to know which Dsl
post you saw first or replied to.

Janet UK

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>
>> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top
>> headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
>> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I
>> would post a link to the article, but
>> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an
>> email.)
>>
>>
>
> I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
> the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
> here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
> little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.
>

Do you have the address by any chance? Just ... ya know ... curious.



--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On 2014-09-24 11:21 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>
>>> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top
>>> headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
>>> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I
>>> would post a link to the article, but
>>> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an
>>> email.)
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
>> the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
>> here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
>> little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.
>>
>
> Do you have the address by any chance? Just ... ya know ... curious.
>
>
>
> --
> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
> SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
> Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>
> Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
> http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
>
>

How about an URL for the debunking.:
http://ca.eonline.com/news/582050/gi...elaborate-hoax


The article says that she was a massage therapist in Tampa. It tells
about how her luggage was stolen at the airport there and a couple
people arrested. The paperwork indicates that among the articles in the
bag was a three breast prosthetic. Of course it would be much easier to
forge a police department property receipt than to get a third boob
installation, and there would be no issues with the cops released
personal data to the police.

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-09-24 11:21 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top
>>>> headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
>>>> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I
>>>> would post a link to the article, but
>>>> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an
>>>> email.)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
>>> the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
>>> here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
>>> little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.
>>>
>>
>> Do you have the address by any chance? Just ... ya know ... curious.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
>> SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
>> Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>>
>> Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
>> http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
>>
>>
>
> How about an URL for the debunking.:
> http://ca.eonline.com/news/582050/gi...elaborate-hoax
>
>
> The article says that she was a massage therapist in Tampa. It tells about
> how her luggage was stolen at the airport there and a couple people
> arrested. The paperwork indicates that among the articles in the bag was a
> three breast prosthetic. Of course it would be much easier to forge a
> police department property receipt than to get a third boob installation,
> and there would be no issues with the cops released personal data to the
> police.


Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On 2014-09-24 12:33 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-09-24 11:21 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top
>>>>> headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
>>>>> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange. (I
>>>>> would post a link to the article, but
>>>>> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an
>>>>> email.)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
>>>> the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
>>>> here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
>>>> little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Do you have the address by any chance? Just ... ya know ... curious.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
>>> SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
>>> Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>>>
>>> Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
>>> http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
>>>
>>>
>>
>> How about an URL for the debunking.:
>> http://ca.eonline.com/news/582050/gi...elaborate-hoax
>>
>>
>> The article says that she was a massage therapist in Tampa. It tells about
>> how her luggage was stolen at the airport there and a couple people
>> arrested. The paperwork indicates that among the articles in the bag was a
>> three breast prosthetic. Of course it would be much easier to forge a
>> police department property receipt than to get a third boob installation,
>> and there would be no issues with the cops released personal data to the
>> police.
>
>
> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>


You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?

On 9/24/2014 10:45 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> Ds1, thanks, I have been told to use desktop mode before, but that format is super irritating to me.
>
> It's more than irritating to the entire group, when you provide no
> clue what you're talking about.
>
>> I try to say enough of what I am replying to. If people would read posts in order, like in this thread,
>
> DUH!! There is no fixed order. People read posts in the order their
> server delivers them from others (which varies enormously ) and/or in
> the order they set for themselves (oldest first, or newest first). If
> they use a killfile that also affects which posts they see.
>
>
> So no posters are likely to see or read any thread in the same order
> you do. That's the nature of usenet, it is NOT like email or a
> webforum.
>
>> my response to the first post made by Paul should have made obvious what I was replying to.
>
> Not at all, because there's no way for anybody else to know which Dsl
> post you saw first or replied to.
>
> Janet UK
>
Janet, until you responded with full quotes I had NO idea she was
answering a reply by dsl. Hence the need for quoting.

I also had no idea she was replying to Paul... if she's talking about
Paul M. Cook he's in my killfile so how would I know she was replying to
him?

I don't dislike Nancy2 at all... I just wish she'd figure out how to
quote relevant text.

Jill

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-09-24 12:33 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 2014-09-24 11:21 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 2014-09-24 9:20 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To everyone in this third-boob thread: Take a quick look at the top
>>>>>> headlines at E! Online. The whole three-boob
>>>>>> story is a hoax. And the rest of the story is also pretty strange.
>>>>>> (I
>>>>>> would post a link to the article, but
>>>>>> whatever I copy and paste is some weird thing that I cut from an
>>>>>> email.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I guess we aren't surprised about that. The whole story was fishy from
>>>>> the start. I mean.... having a third boob implanted in order to make
>>>>> here self repulsive to men??? She was a "massage therapist". Read a
>>>>> little bit into that one... she worked in a massage parlor.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Do you have the address by any chance? Just ... ya know ... curious.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
>>>> SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
>>>> Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
>>>> http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> How about an URL for the debunking.:
>>> http://ca.eonline.com/news/582050/gi...elaborate-hoax
>>>
>>>
>>> The article says that she was a massage therapist in Tampa. It tells
>>> about
>>> how her luggage was stolen at the airport there and a couple people
>>> arrested. The paperwork indicates that among the articles in the bag was
>>> a
>>> three breast prosthetic. Of course it would be much easier to forge a
>>> police department property receipt than to get a third boob
>>> installation,
>>> and there would be no issues with the cops released personal data to the
>>> police.
>>
>>
>> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>>
>
>
> You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
> legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?

I would sure hope so.



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On Monday, September 22, 2014 3:02:17 PM UTC-4, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/0...d-third-breast
>
>
>
> Next, a man with three buttocks.
>

If the dumb media didn't publish this junk, maybe people would revert to a level of normalcy.

Janet, thanks for the lesson(?) but are posts variously sorted in some cases by, say, newest first, without
regard to the thread in which they appear? Every news reader I have ever used initially sorts by thread,
not randomly by which post was newest.

Still, it is rarely that I don't include enough of a topic in a post so people know to what I am referring.

Solution? Don't read my posts. Like I said yesterday, I seldom say anything earthshaking anyway.

N.

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
>
> Janet, thanks for the lesson(?) but are posts variously sorted in some
> cases by, say, newest first, without
> regard to the thread in which they appear? Every news reader I have ever
> used initially sorts by thread,
> not randomly by which post was newest.
>
> Still, it is rarely that I don't include enough of a topic in a post so
> people know to what I am referring.
>
> Solution? Don't read my posts. Like I said yesterday, I seldom say
> anything earthshaking anyway.
>
> N.

I very much enjoy your posts Nancy. I don't have a problem with them.

Cheri

On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 3:12:15 AM UTC-10, Nancy2 wrote:
> Ds1, thanks, I have been told to use desktop mode before, but that format is super irritating to me.
>
> Besides, the last time I switched, in another group, when I saw my post, no quoted material
>
> showed up unless I clicked on "show quoted material." Maybe that is an iPad quirk.
>
>
>
> I try to say enough of what I am replying to. If people would read posts in order, like in this thread,
>
> my response to the first post made by Paul should have made obvious what I was replying to.
>
> Paul gave a link. If these people complaining had read that first post and followed the link, they
>
> would have known what I meant when I said, "I saw that."
>
>
>
> Anyway, I am old and cranky, so just don't read my posts. All the quoting worked fine on my laptop,
>
> at least, in the old days. Now it doesn't.
>
>
>
> N.

This would be a big flaw with the Google Groups mobile interface. It's been that way for years but it is only until recently that I've seen people beginning to use it sans quotes.

Folks will bitch about it but that's just the nature of the beast. I've even posted that way myself. Like you, I replied to the OP. Personally, I like the idea of posting to the entire group instead of a person. I don't have any problems with the way people choose to post. OTOH, the stuff they say - Oy Vey!

On 2014-09-24 1:08 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message

>>>
>>> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>>>
>>
>>
>> You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
>> legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?
>
> I would sure hope so.
>

I was referring to a legitimate massage therapist, not a semi hooker at
a rug and tug.

On 24/09/2014 12:13 PM, Kalmia wrote:
> On Monday, September 22, 2014 3:02:17 PM UTC-4, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> http://www.9news.com.au/world/2014/0...d-third-breast
>>
>>
>>
>> Next, a man with three buttocks.
>>

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJleJbn9G6Y

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2014-09-24 1:08 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>
>>>>
>>>> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
>>> legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?
>>
>> I would sure hope so.
>>
>
> I was referring to a legitimate massage therapist, not a semi hooker at
> a rug and tug.

Rug and tug? Sounds interesting.


--
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 360 of my spam emails to date.
Get the free SPAMfighter he http://www.spamfighter.com/len

Do you have a slow PC? Try a Free scan
http://www.spamfighter.com/SLOW-PCfighter?cid=sigen



---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com

On 2014-09-24 6:30 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 2014-09-24 1:08 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
>>>> legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?
>>>
>>> I would sure hope so.
>>>
>>
>> I was referring to a legitimate massage therapist, not a semi hooker at
>> a rug and tug.
>
> Rug and tug? Sounds interesting.
>

Sorry about the typo. Rub and tug.... happy endings.

On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 7:22:42 PM UTC-4, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-09-24 6:30 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>
> > ...
>
> >> On 2014-09-24 1:08 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
> >>> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message
>
> >>
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>> Are we talking therapeutic massage or the happy kind?
>
> >>>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>>
>
> >>>> You have seen the video and the pictures of the girl. Do you think a
>
> >>>> legitimate massage therapist would look like that and act like that?
>
> >>>
>
> >>> I would sure hope so.
>
> >>>
>
> >>
>
> >> I was referring to a legitimate massage therapist, not a semi hooker at
>
> >> a rug and tug.
>
> >
>
> > Rug and tug? Sounds interesting.
>
> >
>
>
>
> Sorry about the typo. Rub and tug.... happy endings.

Thanks for the correction. I was trying to picture something involving a Magic Carpet.