Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really looking
forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DavidW" wrote:
> >I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really looking >forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was bread-like rather >than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better with puff pastry. Why mess >with a classic? I'd not order such a dish first time at a restaurant... I'd eat at a restaurant several times so I could observe their preparations before ordering anything out of the ordinary. I always observe other tables before ordering anything... observing the presentations gives me a good idea of what to expect... I especially take note of how their bar beverages are served. Sometimes what I've observed caused me to get up and depart... there have been times I felt it was wiser to pick up somehing at a known deli on the way home. When trying out a new restaurant I order something very basic, I can tell a lot from their soup du jour or their salad about the quality of their entrees. But mostly I know from their 2ni if I'll want to order dinner. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-16 21:10, DavidW wrote:
> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really looking > forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was bread-like rather > than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better with puff pastry. Why mess > with a classic? > It is good with puff pastry. If you had it in a restaurant and the pastry was that bad you should have complained. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17 01:10:40 +0000, DavidW said:
> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really > looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was > bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better > with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? That's really really sad. I wish I had never read about this - I'm imagining something like one of those bread bowls like you'd get soup in at a TGI Benne****erbee's but with a tenderloin in it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really > looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was > bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better > with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? > > I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? This looks like the horrific abomination you experienced. Sauce looks feeble too. http://www.artisanbreadinfive.com/20...oeuf-en-croute |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-10-16 21:10, DavidW wrote: >> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >> > > It is good with puff pastry. If you had it in a restaurant and the > pastry was that bad you should have complained. It wasn't that the pastry was bad. It wasn't pastry at all - by design. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pico Rico wrote:
> "DavidW" > wrote in message > ... >> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >> > > I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have used a simpler dough for cost reasons. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brooklyn1 wrote:
> "DavidW" wrote: >> >> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? > > I'd not order such a dish first time at a restaurant... It was a one-time visit, so I ordered what appealed to me the most. What else can you do for a one-off meal? > I'd eat at a > restaurant several times so I could observe their preparations before > ordering anything out of the ordinary. I always observe other > tables before ordering anything... observing the presentations gives > me a good idea of what to expect... I especially take note > of how their bar beverages are served. Sometimes what I've observed > caused me to get up and depart... there have been times I felt it was > wiser to pick up somehing at a known deli on the way home. When > trying out a new restaurant I order something very basic, I can tell a > lot from their soup du jour or their salad about the quality of their > entrees. But mostly I know from their 2ni if I'll want to order > dinner. It is a popular, well-known and well-rated restaurant. Pink (the singer) is among those who (figuratively) sings its praises and eats there regularly when in town. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > Pico Rico wrote: >> "DavidW" > wrote in message >> ... >>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >>> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>> >> >> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? > > I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own > variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have used > a simpler dough for cost reasons. Brioche is a common sub. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "DavidW" > wrote in message > ... >> Pico Rico wrote: >>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would >>>> have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>>> >>> >>> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? >> >> I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own >> variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have >> used a simpler dough for cost reasons. > > > Brioche is a common sub. Maybe that was it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really > looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was > bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better > with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? That's weird. I just remember my BIL ordering it. I warned him that he wouldn't like it. He didn't. My in-laws don't usually like really fancy stuff. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > Brooklyn1 wrote: >> "DavidW" wrote: >>> >>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >>> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >> >> I'd not order such a dish first time at a restaurant... > > It was a one-time visit, so I ordered what appealed to me the most. What > else can you do for a one-off meal? > >> I'd eat at a >> restaurant several times so I could observe their preparations before >> ordering anything out of the ordinary. I always observe other >> tables before ordering anything... observing the presentations gives >> me a good idea of what to expect... I especially take note >> of how their bar beverages are served. Sometimes what I've observed >> caused me to get up and depart... there have been times I felt it was >> wiser to pick up somehing at a known deli on the way home. When >> trying out a new restaurant I order something very basic, I can tell a >> lot from their soup du jour or their salad about the quality of their >> entrees. But mostly I know from their 2ni if I'll want to order >> dinner. > > It is a popular, well-known and well-rated restaurant. Pink (the singer) > is among those who (figuratively) sings its praises and eats there > regularly when in town. Now I am curious. Do they have an online menu? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Oregonian Haruspex" > wrote in message ... > On 2014-10-17 01:10:40 +0000, DavidW said: > >> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really >> looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was >> bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better >> with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? > > That's really really sad. I wish I had never read about this - I'm > imagining something like one of those bread bowls like you'd get soup in > at a TGI Benne****erbee's but with a tenderloin in it. OMG! Those bread bowls are the worst! Where my mom lives, they serve chili in a bread bowl. Why? I do know a lot of people who think they are really "neat", my mom being one of them. I am not in that camp. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > Pico Rico wrote: >> "DavidW" > wrote in message >> ... >>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have >>> been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>> >> >> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? > > I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own > variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have used > a simpler dough for cost reasons. > > it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2014-10-17, > wrote: > >> pastry to make, or buy, your choice. It's somehow a nice dramatic >> dish and quite fun to make and serve. > > I've made a baked Alaska. Actually, pretty easy, but I had a helper > (we used no power appliances) and an audience (cooking school) to help > eat/critique the dish. I'm not wading thru an entire BW effort jes to > impress myself. ![]() > >> I have never heard of using crepes..... > > Until now. Baked Alaska!! That is a blast from the past ![]() often ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:25:30 +0100, "Ophelia"
> wrote: > Baked Alaska!! That is a blast from the past ![]() > often ![]() I've only seen Baked Alaska in pictures. Don't recall ever seeing it on a restaurant menu (if it was at the same time as the souffle era, then I know I always ordered a souffle) and was never interested enough to make it at home. -- Never trust a dog to watch your food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:25:30 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> Baked Alaska!! That is a blast from the past ![]() >> often ![]() > > I've only seen Baked Alaska in pictures. Don't recall ever seeing it > on a restaurant menu (if it was at the same time as the souffle era, > then I know I always ordered a souffle) and was never interested > enough to make it at home. We loved it ![]() just the two of us. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, October 16, 2014 8:10:40 PM UTC-5, DavidW wrote:
> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really looking > > forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was bread-like rather > > than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better with puff pastry. Why mess > > with a classic? Have only had it with a puff pastry, but who knows how it can be served. I was recently in France, the big thing I noticed was serving food Deconstructed. I had Beef wellington Deconstructed , which basically meeant it was all mixed up in a mess. Lasagna deconscructed, instead of layers, all mixed up. I was less than thrilled. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17 11:13 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2014-10-17, > wrote: > >> Her trick was using short crust pastry for the base and puff on top, > > Bingo. > > I recently came across a recipe for Beef Wellington in a back issue of > Fine Cooking magazine, which is famous for always including one > detailed all inclusive classic recipe. I was aware of the puff pastry > and the duxelles, but had never heard of wrapping the meat in crépes > to help absorb the beef juices and so avoid making the puff pastry > soggy. According to wiki, some recipes --apparently not all-- include > crépes as an ingredient. Regardless, it was too involved for me, so > I've not made Beef Wellington. ![]() > That is curious. I had looked at Beef Wellington recipes and never noticed the crepes. I have made Boeuf en Croute several times. That is basically serving size Beef Wellington. No crepes. So I Googled "Beef Wellington crepes" and the first few recipes did indeed call for thin crepes. When I Googled just "Beef Wellington" the recipes that came up had no crepes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17, Dave Smith > wrote:
> On 2014-10-17 11:23 AM, wrote: >> I have never heard of using crepes, nor would I like them there! > I see no need. Whether neeeded or not, some versions do, in fact, use crépes. I finally found the Fine Cooking recipe, including a handy video: <http://www.finecooking.com/videos/how-to-make-classic-beef-wellington.aspx> <http://www.finecooking.com/recipes/classic-beef-wellington.aspx> Yer right. Doesn't look too difficult. Now, if only I had a big heap o' jingles to buy that hunka hunka bleed'n beef. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2014-10-17, Dave Smith > wrote: > >> On 2014-10-17 11:23 AM, wrote: > >>> I have never heard of using crepes, nor would I like them there! > >> I see no need. > > Whether neeeded or not, some versions do, in fact, use crépes. I > finally found the Fine Cooking recipe, including a handy video: > > <http://www.finecooking.com/videos/how-to-make-classic-beef-wellington.aspx> > > <http://www.finecooking.com/recipes/classic-beef-wellington.aspx> > > Yer right. Doesn't look too difficult. Now, if only I had a big heap > o' jingles to buy that hunka hunka bleed'n beef. ![]() > > nb you can make a "mini" - just make it with a single, thick, filet inside. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/10/2014 9:13 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2014-10-17, > wrote: > >> Her trick was using short crust pastry for the base and puff on top, > > Bingo. > > I recently came across a recipe for Beef Wellington in a back issue of > Fine Cooking magazine, which is famous for always including one > detailed all inclusive classic recipe. I was aware of the puff pastry > and the duxelles, but had never heard of wrapping the meat in crépes > to help absorb the beef juices and so avoid making the puff pastry > soggy. According to wiki, some recipes --apparently not all-- include > crépes as an ingredient. Regardless, it was too involved for me, so > I've not made Beef Wellington. ![]() > > nb > Many years ago I tried putting a thin layer of toast under the fillet to absorb the juices. It worked and blended in nicely. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/10/2014 9:23 AM, wrote:
> On 17 Oct 2014 15:13:40 GMT, notbob > wrote: > >> On 2014-10-17, > wrote: >> >>> Her trick was using short crust pastry for the base and puff on top, >> >> Bingo. >> >> I recently came across a recipe for Beef Wellington in a back issue of >> Fine Cooking magazine, which is famous for always including one >> detailed all inclusive classic recipe. I was aware of the puff pastry >> and the duxelles, but had never heard of wrapping the meat in crépes >> to help absorb the beef juices and so avoid making the puff pastry >> soggy. According to wiki, some recipes --apparently not all-- include >> crépes as an ingredient. Regardless, it was too involved for me, so >> I've not made Beef Wellington. ![]() >> >> nb > > It's not really involved. You need a good tenderloin or two, you do > need to make the duxelle to paint the meat, but then there's just the > pastry to make, or buy, your choice. It's somehow a nice dramatic > dish and quite fun to make and serve. > > I have never heard of using crepes, nor would I like them there! > I made a meatloaf version once - very economical!! It was great! I just moulded the minced beef, the lowest fat content I could find, and roasted it to remove the excess fat and making sure it was cooked through before wrapping it. It was a family meal *not* for a dinner party. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
DavidW > wrote:
> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was really looking > forward to it but disappointed when I found that the shell was bread-like > rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would have been better with puff > pastry. Why mess with a classic? As far as I am concerned, the "classic" is not really worth messing with in any sense of the word. I said it once or twice and I will say it again: Of all the famous recipes, Beef Wellington is one of the most overrated. Roasting or browning a solid piece of meat and then steaming it (which is what happens once you enclose it in a pastry shell and continue to cook) does nothing for its flavour, except for dumbing it down. The pastry adds its own bland-down effect and the optional addition of foie gras is designed more to impress the guest than to improve the dish. It's not accidental that most pie-type meat dishes call for *minced* meat - it somehow blends in and contributes to the making of a harmonious whole, rather than to a combination of basically unrelated ingredients. But that's just MHO and it doesn't mean I wouldn't be able to enjoy the dish - just not on the same level as a really well-composed one. "A few years ago it was considered chic to serve Beef Wellington; fortunately, like Napoleon, it met its Waterloo." -- Rene Veaux, Lasserre restaurant, Paris Victor |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17 5:19 PM, Victor Sack wrote:
> > As far as I am concerned, the "classic" is not really worth messing with > in any sense of the word. I said it once or twice and I will say it > again: Of all the famous recipes, Beef Wellington is one of the most > overrated. Roasting or browning a solid piece of meat and then steaming > it (which is what happens once you enclose it in a pastry shell and > continue to cook) does nothing for its flavour, except for dumbing it > down. The pastry adds its own bland-down effect and the optional > addition of foie gras is designed more to impress the guest than to > improve the dish. I have never had it in a restaurant or at someone else's home. I have only had boeuf en croute at home and cooked it myself. The first time I made it I kept muttering to myself that it had better be good, because it was a lot of work. I had to make the pastry, the duxelle, the pate, the browning sauce etc. And... it was good. It looked good and it tasted good, and our guests were impressed. The second time I was better prepared and bought some of the ingredients. > It's not accidental that most pie-type meat dishes > call for *minced* meat - it somehow blends in and contributes to the > making of a harmonious whole, rather than to a combination of basically > unrelated ingredients. But that's just MHO and it doesn't mean I > wouldn't be able to enjoy the dish - just not on the same level as a > really well-composed one. I don't disagree that there are some great meat pies made with ground meat. Tourtiere is made with ground meat. The church lady meat pies are made with ground meat. My wife makes and incredible steak and mushroom pie with chunks of sirloin. IMO, the only drawback to a Beef Wellington is the work and the expense of the other ingredients. Personally, I would rather had a filet steak with some salt and coarsely ground pepper rubbed into it and then slap in on a hot pan to sear the outsides and serve it while it is still raw in the middle. > > "A few years ago it was considered chic to serve Beef > Wellington; fortunately, like Napoleon, it met its Waterloo." > -- Rene Veaux, Lasserre restaurant, Paris |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "DavidW" > wrote in message ... > Pico Rico wrote: >> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>> Pico Rico wrote: >>>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>>>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>>>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>>>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would >>>>> have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>>> >>>> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? >>> >>> I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own >>> variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have >>> used a simpler dough for cost reasons. >> >> it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. > > I would be surprised, and disappointed as a diner, if a good restaurant > did > that. Even on reality cooking shows contestants get marked down and lashed > by > the judges for using store-bought pastry. > perhaps, but they surely would get marked down even more if they used some sort of bread dough. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17 6:30 PM, DavidW wrote:
> Pico Rico wrote: >> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>> Pico Rico wrote: >>>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>>>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>>>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>>>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would >>>>> have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>>> >>>> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? >>> >>> I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own >>> variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have >>> used a simpler dough for cost reasons. >> >> it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. > > I would be surprised, and disappointed as a diner, if a good restaurant did > that. Even on reality cooking shows contestants get marked down and lashed by > the judges for using store-bought pastry. > Pshaw. First of all, there is no reality to those "reality" shows. Other FN chefs suggest that you buy puff pastry. It is a lot of expense and a lot of work to make it yourself. I may be one of the few people who finds it easy to make regular pie dough, but pie dough IMO is easy. Puff pastry is a lot of work. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julie Bove wrote:
> "DavidW" > wrote in message >> It is a popular, well-known and well-rated restaurant. Pink (the >> singer) is among those who (figuratively) sings its praises and eats >> there regularly when in town. > > Now I am curious. Do they have an online menu? http://theeuropean.com.au/dinner.html It looks different now. I don't remember the air-dried part, or the potatoes etc., and it wasn't for two when I had it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pico Rico wrote:
> "DavidW" > wrote in message >> Pico Rico wrote: >>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would >>>> have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>> >>> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? >> >> I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own >> variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have >> used a simpler dough for cost reasons. > > it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. I would be surprised, and disappointed as a diner, if a good restaurant did that. Even on reality cooking shows contestants get marked down and lashed by the judges for using store-bought pastry. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2014-10-17 6:30 PM, DavidW wrote: >> Pico Rico wrote: >>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>>> Pico Rico wrote: >>>>> "DavidW" > wrote in message >>>>>> I've only had it once, at a restaurant a year or two ago. I was >>>>>> really looking forward to it but disappointed when I found that the >>>>>> shell was bread-like rather than puff pastry. I'm sure it would >>>>>> have been better with puff pastry. Why mess with a classic? >>>>> >>>>> I have only made it with puff pastry - why is that so difficult? >>>> >>>> I don't know if it was difficult or they just chose to cook their own >>>> variation. Puff pastry is time consuming, though, so they might have >>>> used a simpler dough for cost reasons. >>> >>> it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. >> >> I would be surprised, and disappointed as a diner, if a good restaurant >> did >> that. Even on reality cooking shows contestants get marked down and >> lashed by >> the judges for using store-bought pastry. >> > > > > Pshaw. First of all, there is no reality to those "reality" shows. Other > FN chefs suggest that you buy puff pastry. It is a lot of expense and a > lot of work to make it yourself. > > I may be one of the few people who finds it easy to make regular pie > dough, but pie dough IMO is easy. Puff pastry is a lot of work. > > and the home made stuff, if made correctly, will puff more than the store bought. That is more appropriate for pastries, rather than Wellington. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 17:25:30 +0100, "Ophelia" > > wrote: > >> Baked Alaska!! That is a blast from the past ![]() >> often ![]() > > I've only seen Baked Alaska in pictures. Don't recall ever seeing it > on a restaurant menu (if it was at the same time as the souffle era, > then I know I always ordered a souffle) and was never interested > enough to make it at home. We had to make it in Home Ec. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2014-10-17 6:30 PM, DavidW wrote: >> Pico Rico wrote: >>> it is not time consuming to BUY the puff pastry. >> >> I would be surprised, and disappointed as a diner, if a good >> restaurant did that. Even on reality cooking shows contestants get >> marked down and lashed by the judges for using store-bought pastry. > > Pshaw. First of all, there is no reality to those "reality" shows. I'm sure there's plenty that we don't see, and I've heard some of it, but there is enough reality. The contestants _are_ cooking those dishes. > Other FN chefs suggest that you buy puff pastry. It is a lot of > expense and a lot of work to make it yourself. I bet they don't buy puff pastry at Noma or The Fat Duck. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2014-10-17 19:57, DavidW wrote:
>> Pshaw. First of all, there is no reality to those "reality" shows. > > I'm sure there's plenty that we don't see, and I've heard some of it, but there > is enough reality. The contestants _are_ cooking those dishes. No. We don't see it. We hear it... like the chefs who are competing in memory of a recently deceased family member or a child/sister/parent/friend who has just been diagnosed with cancer. > >> Other FN chefs suggest that you buy puff pastry. It is a lot of >> expense and a lot of work to make it yourself. > > > I bet they don't buy puff pastry at Noma or The Fat Duck. You're talking top of the line restaurants versus a cooking competition where chef/contestants have a limited amount of time to prepare a pastry dough that takes close to 2 hours. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BEEF WELLINGTON | General Cooking | |||
Cheap Beef Wellington | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Rec: Deconstructed Beef Wellington (Michael Dog3 read...) | General Cooking | |||
Question on Beef Wellington | General Cooking | |||
Easy Beef Wellington | Recipes (moderated) |