"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:35:01 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"ImStillMags" > wrote in message
...
>>> Got to craving it. So I'm making it. Yummy lunches and portions in the
>>> freezer for later.
>>>
>>> I'm putting some chili hot pinto beans in this one for a change. Fred
>>> Meyer (Kroger) has their own brand called Simple Truth that are organic
>>> chili hot pintos. Gonna try them.
>>>
>>> I'm making the recipe so it is lower in carbs...about 9 per cup.
>>
>>I might make that next week. I still have plenty of Mayocoba bean soup.
>
> Save time and effort:
> http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&key...l_10b88tjx2g_e

Nope. Would have to be some kind of really dire emergency for me to use
dried stuff like that. Chili isn't hard to make at all and not time
consuming.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 08:36:12 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, October 18, 2014 7:59:55 PM UTC-5, jmcquown wrote:
>>>> > On 10/18/2014 3:47 PM, ImStillMags wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > On Saturday, October 18, 2014 11:39:26 AM UTC-7, sf wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >> On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 11:19:45 -0700 (PDT), ImStillMags
>>>> >
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> > >> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> > >>> by using canned beans instead of dry beans
>>>> >
>>>> > >>
>>>> >
>>>> > >> Huh. I'm not finding support for that. SFgate says: Sugar, high
>>>> >
>>>> > >> fructose corn syrup and other sweeteners produce a sweeter beans
>>>> > >> that
>>>> >
>>>> > >> are significantly higher in calories. A 3.5-ounce serving of plain
>>>> >
>>>> > >> boiled adzuki beans, for example, has 128 calories and less than
>>>> > >> 25
>>>> >
>>>> > >> grams of carbohydrates, while an equivalent amount of sweetened
>>>> > >> canned
>>>> >
>>>> > >> adzuki beans supplies 237 calories and 55 grams of carbohydrates.
>>>> >
>>>> > >> http://healthyeating.sfgate.com/drie...lues-3026.html
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > > going by the nutrition label on the can of beans, the whole can of
>>>> > > beans is 53 net carbs.
>>>> >
>>>> > > there is no sugar listed on the ingredients.
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > > when you add up ALL the carbs in the TOTAL of a 6.5 quart pot of
>>>> > > chili, trust me I did the math, it came out to 9 carbs per cup
>>>> >
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> > Why would she bellyache over your carb counts? Honest to gawd. You
>>>> >
>>>> > made a pot of chili. (I still have no idea where I could find
>>>> > friggin
>>>> >
>>>> > adzuki beans, canned or otherwise.)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > The carb police don't need to swoop in to question your dinner.
>>>> > What's
>>>> >
>>>> > next, you didn't make gluten free cornbread? OMG.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > What happened to the days when people just cooked, ate, enjoyed and
>>>> >
>>>> > posted about it? NO quantifying, qualifying and turning everything
>>>> > into
>>>> >
>>>> > the latest diet ledger?
>>>> >
>>>> Some of us would like to get laid, and not being a fat-**** helps in
>>>> that
>>>> department. You're content to be a sexless old maid. Not everyone
>>>> feels
>>>> that way.
>>>> >
>>>
>>> I've been on rfc since the '90s and it has never been the way Jill
>>> seems to remember. Sheldon talked about weenies (alluding to penis's)
>>> back then - but it's basically the same ole same ole.
>>>
>>> In any case, I asked an honest question. Sitara said she was lowering
>>> the carb count and I asked how she was doing it. She said she was
>>> using canned beans, which is something people don't usually use when
>>> they are trying to lower their carb count but I didn't know why - so I
>>> looked it up. The nutritional value of canned vs dry beans was the
>>> point of that article and the name of the bean was purely
>>> incidental... + "for example" is clearly stated, so I have no idea
>>> what Jill's problem was. Nor do I care.
>>
>> To be fair, I couldn't understand why canned beans would be lower carb
>> than dried ... when cooked of course.
>
> They're not and I am confused. I thought this was someone else who posted
> this. Not Sitara?

Goodness only knows. I certainly don't ... nor do I care very much.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/