 |
|
| General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-20 4:38 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times snip... I don't make it a habit of advertising who I filter. Sure, I have identified a couple, but not all. One of them was the idiot Kuthe, who decided to play net nanny and complained about a long OT thread and started a running tally, responding to each new post and announcing his now count. This sort of thing comes pretty close to the idiocy that he demonstrated with that nonsense. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 11:21:44 AM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
> "notbob" > wrote in message > ... > > It works! Yay. > > > > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if > > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting > > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be > > eliminatied from my view. > > > > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: > > > > [rec.food.cooking] > > Sco: =-9999 > > Lines: 50 > > > > .....should do the trick. Works fer me!  > > > > nb > > Public plonking is childish. LOL > I agree that "public plonking is childish," but so is putting "LOL" after a sentence that is not even marginally funny. Did you *really* laugh out loud? > > Cheri --Bryan |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:10:06 PM UTC-6, tert in seattle wrote:
> Brooklyn1 wrote: > > spamtrap wrote: > >> > >>The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even > >>a Brokelyn post. > > > > Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this > > Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin. > > haha spermtrap good one Sheldon was his brother's spermtrap. It was mutual. --Bryan |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/20/2015 12:21 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:59:04 -0800 (PST), dsi1 > > wrote: > >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:16:36 AM UTC-10, notbob wrote: >>> It works! Yay. >>> >>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if >>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting >>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be >>> eliminatied from my view. >>> >>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: >>> >>> [rec.food.cooking] >>> Sco: =-9999 >>> Lines: 50 >>> >>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me! >>> >>> nb >> >> I suspect that people will still continue to not trim or you might even be encouraging people to behave horribly. OTOH, your optimism is truly inspirational. > > Either that or he could hold his breath until they stop. > That would be a most unwise move. ;-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/20/2015 12:51 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-01-20 4:38 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: > >> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times > > > snip... > I don't make it a habit of advertising who I filter. Sure, I have > identified a couple, but not all. One of them was the idiot Kuthe, who > decided to play net nanny and complained about a long OT thread and > started a running tally, responding to each new post and announcing his > now count. This sort of thing comes pretty close to the idiocy that he > demonstrated with that nonsense. > This place needs to be moderated! ;-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-20 6:46 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>> >> snip... >> I don't make it a habit of advertising who I filter. Sure, I have >> identified a couple, but not all. One of them was the idiot Kuthe, who >> decided to play net nanny and complained about a long OT thread and >> started a running tally, responding to each new post and announcing his >> now count. This sort of thing comes pretty close to the idiocy that he >> demonstrated with that nonsense. >> > > This place needs to be moderated! ;-) Would it not be easier if people just got out of the habit of quoting 100 lines of text and that adding less than a line of new text? |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/20/2015 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-01-20 6:46 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >>> >>> snip... >>> I don't make it a habit of advertising who I filter. Sure, I have >>> identified a couple, but not all. One of them was the idiot Kuthe, who >>> decided to play net nanny and complained about a long OT thread and >>> started a running tally, responding to each new post and announcing his >>> now count. This sort of thing comes pretty close to the idiocy that he >>> demonstrated with that nonsense. >>> >> >> This place needs to be moderated! ;-) > > Would it not be easier if people just got out of the habit of quoting > 100 lines of text and that adding less than a line of new text? I'm sure that such a thing is possible - in heaven. ;-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 4:38:14 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: > > On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote: > > > "notbob" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > > It works! Yay. > > > > > > > > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if > > > > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting > > > > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be > > > > eliminatied from my view. > > > > > > > > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: > > > > > > > > [rec.food.cooking] > > > > Sco: =-9999 > > > > Lines: 50 > > > > > > > > .....should do the trick. Works fer me! > > > > > > > > nb > > > > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > Good Job! > > > > Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have some kind of a repeat function? > > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps.. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) Lord, don't give a certain poster any ideas on how to multiply drivel tenfold, nay, 1000 fold, nay......ad infinitum. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/20/2015 2:24 PM, Kalmia wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 4:38:14 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote: >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: >>> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote: >>>> "notbob" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> It works! Yay. >>>>> >>>>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if >>>>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting >>>>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be >>>>> eliminatied from my view. >>>>> >>>>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: >>>>> >>>>> [rec.food.cooking] >>>>> Sco: =-9999 >>>>> Lines: 50 >>>>> >>>>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me! >>>>> >>>>> nb >>>> >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>>> Good Job! >>> >>> Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have some kind of a repeat function? >> >> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm g ame enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 step s. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > > Lord, don't give a certain poster any ideas on how to multiply drivel tenfold, nay, 1000 fold, nay......ad infinitum. > You know - you're probably right about this. ;-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 21/01/2015 10:42 AM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:10:06 PM UTC-6, tert in seattle wrote: >> Brooklyn1 wrote: >>> spamtrap wrote: >>>> >>>> The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even >>>> a Brokelyn post. >>> >>> Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this >>> Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin. >> >> haha spermtrap good one > > Sheldon was his brother's spermtrap. It was mutual. > > --Bryan > Who is Sheldon? I see no poster with that name here. -- Xeno. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote: >> > "notbob" > wrote in message >> > ... >> > > It works! Yay. >> > > >> > > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if >> > > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting >> > > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be >> > > eliminatied from my view. >> > > >> > > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: >> > > >> > > [rec.food.cooking] >> > > Sco: =-9999 >> > > Lines: 50 >> > > >> > > .....should do the trick. Works fer me! >> > > >> > > nb >> > >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> > Good Job! >> >> Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have some >> kind of a repeat function? > > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) > My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in > 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) Hey STOP THAT! I am the only one who doesn't trim dontchaknow!!!! You are stealing my crown! How can they blame me when you do stuff like that. Pah, spoiling their games! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 1/20/2015 12:51 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2015-01-20 4:38 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: >> >>> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times >> >> >> snip... >> I don't make it a habit of advertising who I filter. Sure, I have >> identified a couple, but not all. One of them was the idiot Kuthe, who >> decided to play net nanny and complained about a long OT thread and >> started a running tally, responding to each new post and announcing his >> now count. This sort of thing comes pretty close to the idiocy that he >> demonstrated with that nonsense. >> > > This place needs to be moderated! ;-) LOLOL Dave is complaining of someone playing Net Nannny???? You really couldn't make it up!!! He is one of the worst!!! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"Xeno" > wrote in message ... > On 21/01/2015 10:42 AM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote: >> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:10:06 PM UTC-6, tert in seattle wrote: >>> Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>> spamtrap wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even >>>>> a Brokelyn post. >>>> >>>> Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this >>>> Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin. >>> >>> haha spermtrap good one >> >> Sheldon was his brother's spermtrap. It was mutual. >> >> --Bryan >> > Who is Sheldon? I see no poster with that name here. Brooklyn -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 21/01/2015 9:51 PM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Xeno" > wrote in message > ... >> On 21/01/2015 10:42 AM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote: >>> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:10:06 PM UTC-6, tert in seattle >>> wrote: >>>> Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>> spamtrap wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even >>>>>> a Brokelyn post. >>>>> >>>>> Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this >>>>> Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin. >>>> >>>> haha spermtrap good one >>> >>> Sheldon was his brother's spermtrap. It was mutual. >>> >>> --Bryan >>> >> Who is Sheldon? I see no poster with that name here. > > Brooklyn > Ah... IC.... That's his real name, not just another alias? -- Xeno. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"Xeno" > wrote in message ... > On 21/01/2015 9:51 PM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "Xeno" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On 21/01/2015 10:42 AM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 12:10:06 PM UTC-6, tert in seattle >>>> wrote: >>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote: >>>>>> spamtrap wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even >>>>>>> a Brokelyn post. >>>>>> >>>>>> Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this >>>>>> Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin. >>>>> >>>>> haha spermtrap good one >>>> >>>> Sheldon was his brother's spermtrap. It was mutual. >>>> >>>> --Bryan >>>> >>> Who is Sheldon? I see no poster with that name here. >> >> Brooklyn >> > Ah... IC.... That's his real name, not just another alias? No, he is Sheldon. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 6:46:25 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/20/2015 12:51 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > > This place needs to be moderated! ;-) There might be little worth saving. Between the Bove rantings, the feuds between some of the guys, and the perennial caller ID type posts.........you get my drift. I've been posting to another group where the mods were flagged and removed an interesting discussion. Want that to happen here? The poster had a lot of value to say in the group, but now feels hurt and will prob. fade away. The poster got a wee bit off topic and someone took offense. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/19/15 4:05 PM, Cheri wrote:
> > "pltrgyst" > wrote in message > ... >> On 1/19/15 12:20 PM, Cheri wrote: >> >>> Public plonking is childish. LOL >> >> Disagree. It's simply a way of expressing disapproval, and encouraging >> others to do the same. > > As if others can't think for themselves without *encouragement* from a > disgruntled poster. A person can express disapproval with out the plonk > silliness IMO. Yes, they can, but they seldom do. Just look at the cesspool that is any formerly popular and informative newsgroup, such as, say, ... RFC. Public plonking is one form of peer pressure. -- Larry |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-21 9:02 AM, pltrgyst wrote:
>> >> As if others can't think for themselves without *encouragement* from a >> disgruntled poster. A person can express disapproval with out the plonk >> silliness IMO. > > Yes, they can, but they seldom do. Just look at the cesspool that is any > formerly popular and informative newsgroup, such as, say, ... RFC. > > Public plonking is one form of peer pressure. > Peer pressure can be positive or negative. There are all sorts of variations on subtle peer pressure. Responding to everything posted by an narcissistic attention whore is one of them. It encourages the bad behaviour. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-21, dsi1 > wrote:
> On 1/20/2015 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> Would it not be easier if people just got out of the habit of quoting >> 100 lines of text and that adding less than a line of new text? > I'm sure that such a thing is possible - in heaven. ;-) Yeah. I'm not sure if it's lazyness or jes plain orneryness, but this group has about the worst non-trimming problem I've run across. Oh well, not a problem for me, anymore. OBfood: Crap, it's snowing! nb |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-21, pltrgyst > wrote:
> Yes, they can, but they seldom do. Just look at the cesspool that is any > formerly popular and informative newsgroup, such as, say, ... RFC. This newsgroup has been a "cesspool", continuously, ever since I found it over 10 yrs ago. Whacked out evangelist doctors, ****** Limey punks, screw-loose radicals, etc. This latest problem is merely the new plague. Lazy assed posters, loveable trolls, and endless socks. Nothing new. nb |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 21 Jan 2015 15:23:45 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>On 2015-01-21, pltrgyst > wrote: > >> Yes, they can, but they seldom do. Just look at the cesspool that is any >> formerly popular and informative newsgroup, such as, say, ... RFC. > >This newsgroup has been a "cesspool", continuously, ever since I found >it over 10 yrs ago. Whacked out evangelist doctors, ****** Limey >punks, screw-loose radicals, etc. This latest problem is merely the >new plague. Lazy assed posters, loveable trolls, and endless socks. >Nothing new. > >nb And no different from any other open forum online. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:21:17 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote: > Responding to everything posted by > an narcissistic attention whore is one of them. So why are you in those threads? -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 12:43 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" > wrote in message > ... >> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote: >>> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote: >>> > "notbob" > wrote in message >>> > ... >>> > > It works! Yay. >>> > > >>> > > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. >>> IOW, if >>> > > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting >>> > > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be >>> > > eliminatied from my view. >>> > > >>> > > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan: >>> > > >>> > > [rec.food.cooking] >>> > > Sco: =-9999 >>> > > Lines: 50 >>> > > >>> > > .....should do the trick. Works fer me! >>> > > >>> > > nb >>> > >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> > Good Job! >>> >>> Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have >>> some kind of a repeat function? >> >> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times >> in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps >> though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a >> million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for >> 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a >> phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game >> enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and >> paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but >> I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could >> copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do >> that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you >> could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I >> wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess >> is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 >> steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) >> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times >> in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps >> though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a >> million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for >> 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a >> phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game >> enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and >> paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but >> I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could >> copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do >> that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you >> could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I >> wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess >> is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 >> steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) >> My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times >> in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps >> though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a >> million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for >> 4 steps though. :-) > > Hey STOP THAT! I am the only one who doesn't trim dontchaknow!!!! You > are stealing my crown! How can they blame me when you do stuff like > that. Pah, spoiling their games! > :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-( :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) Happy now? :-) |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... >> Hey STOP THAT! I am the only one who doesn't trim dontchaknow!!!! You >> are stealing my crown! How can they blame me when you do stuff like >> that. Pah, spoiling their games! > :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) > > Happy now? :-) LOL Well I will have you know, I don't like that stuff, but I am damned if I will be bullied  ))I guess I am ornery just like you ^5 -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 3:44 AM, Kalmia wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 at 6:46:25 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote: >> On 1/20/2015 12:51 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >> >> This place needs to be moderated! ;-) > > There might be little worth saving. Between the Bove rantings, the feuds between some of the guys, and the perennial caller ID type posts.........you get my drift. > > I've been posting to another group where the mods were flagged and removed an interesting discussion. Want that to happen here? The poster had a lot of value to say in the group, but now feels hurt and will prob. fade away. The poster got a wee bit off topic and someone took offense. > I kid, I kid. I love unmoderated groups. It's all free speech baby! |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 5:16 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2015-01-21, dsi1 > wrote: > >> On 1/20/2015 2:00 PM, Dave Smith wrote: > >>> Would it not be easier if people just got out of the habit of quoting >>> 100 lines of text and that adding less than a line of new text? > >> I'm sure that such a thing is possible - in heaven. ;-) > > Yeah. I'm not sure if it's lazyness or jes plain orneryness, but this > group has about the worst non-trimming problem I've run across. Oh > well, not a problem for me, anymore. > > OBfood: Crap, it's snowing! > In hell? :-) > nb > |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 9:29 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" > wrote in message > ... > >>> Hey STOP THAT! I am the only one who doesn't trim dontchaknow!!!! You >>> are stealing my crown! How can they blame me when you do stuff like >>> that. Pah, spoiling their games! > >> :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) >> >> Happy now? :-) > > LOL Well I will have you know, I don't like that stuff, but I am damned > if I will be bullied ))Oh yeah, I can tell that's true. :-) > > I guess I am ornery just like you ^5 Me? I'm Mr. Happy. :-) :-) :-) ... > > > |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 1:36 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> I kid, I kid. I love unmoderated groups. It's all free speech baby! I agree... but with free speech comes an implied responsibility. On moderated groups, act irresponsibly and there are consequences. On Usenet, there are no consequences other than peer pressure which really isn't much. Actually, this group is moderated by each individual. Some like me do it by putting some posters in a kill-file or ignoring them. I can use this group the way "I" want to use it to suit my own needs. Kill-files are just a tool to help me separate the wheat from the chaff, the good posters from the ones who don't add anything to my life. George L |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 9:50 AM, George Leppla wrote:
> On 1/21/2015 1:36 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >> I kid, I kid. I love unmoderated groups. It's all free speech baby! > > > I agree... but with free speech comes an implied responsibility. On > moderated groups, act irresponsibly and there are consequences. On > Usenet, there are no consequences other than peer pressure which really > isn't much. > > Actually, this group is moderated by each individual. Some like me do > it by putting some posters in a kill-file or ignoring them. I can use > this group the way "I" want to use it to suit my own needs. > > Kill-files are just a tool to help me separate the wheat from the chaff, > the good posters from the ones who don't add anything to my life. > > George L It's a very small price to pay for free speech. As they say - "Freedom isn't free!" |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 1/21/2015 9:29 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "dsi1" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>> Hey STOP THAT! I am the only one who doesn't trim dontchaknow!!!! >>>> You >>>> are stealing my crown! How can they blame me when you do stuff like >>>> that. Pah, spoiling their games! >> >>> :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) >>> >>> Happy now? :-) >> >> LOL Well I will have you know, I don't like that stuff, but I am damned >> if I will be bullied ))> > Oh yeah, I can tell that's true. :-) > >> >> I guess I am ornery just like you ^5 > > Me? I'm Mr. Happy. :-) :-) :-) ... ;-) -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 1:56 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>> >Kill-files are just a tool to help me separate the wheat from the chaff, >> >the good posters from the ones who don't add anything to my life. >> > >> >George L > It's a very small price to pay for free speech. As they say - "Freedom > isn't free!" Even a small price is too much to pay when I am getting something I don't want, like or need. I saw this morning that there were over 150 posts to download but I only got 104 of them... the rest were deleted. This newsgroup becomes more valuable to me when I can eliminate 1/3 of the posts that are from people I don't care to read. There might have been a gem in the pile of posts that were deleted, but the people who make their way into my kill-file generally post things that are more like a lump of coal than a diamond George L |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 1/21/2015 10:36 AM, George Leppla wrote:
> On 1/21/2015 1:56 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> >Kill-files are just a tool to help me separate the wheat from the >>> chaff, >>> >the good posters from the ones who don't add anything to my life. >>> > >>> >George L > >> It's a very small price to pay for free speech. As they say - "Freedom >> isn't free!" > > > Even a small price is too much to pay when I am getting something I > don't want, like or need. > > I saw this morning that there were over 150 posts to download but I only > got 104 of them... the rest were deleted. This newsgroup becomes more > valuable to me when I can eliminate 1/3 of the posts that are from > people I don't care to read. > > There might have been a gem in the pile of posts that were deleted, but > the people who make their way into my kill-file generally post things > that are more like a lump of coal than a diamond > > George L > > This group gets way too many postings! OTOH, most groups are moribund and stagnating so I can't complain... |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:56:42 -1000, dsi1
> wrote: > > It's a very small price to pay for free speech. As they say - "Freedom > isn't free!" As Charlie Hebdo found out after mocking Mohammed and trying to pass it off as satire. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 14:36:44 -0600, George Leppla
> wrote: > There might have been a gem in the pile of posts that were deleted, but > the people who make their way into my kill-file generally post things > that are more like a lump of coal than a diamond Rest assured that if there was a gem hidden in what you deleted, someone would have quoted it. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 22/01/2015 2:40 AM, Boron Elgar wrote:
> On 21 Jan 2015 15:23:45 GMT, notbob > wrote: > >> On 2015-01-21, pltrgyst > wrote: >> >>> Yes, they can, but they seldom do. Just look at the cesspool that is any >>> formerly popular and informative newsgroup, such as, say, ... RFC. >> >> This newsgroup has been a "cesspool", continuously, ever since I found >> it over 10 yrs ago. Whacked out evangelist doctors, ****** Limey >> punks, screw-loose radicals, etc. This latest problem is merely the >> new plague. Lazy assed posters, loveable trolls, and endless socks. >> Nothing new. >> >> nb > > And no different from any other open forum online. > > And unlike many others, there are still a lot of posters left here. Many other forums are effectively dead. -- Xeno. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 22/01/2015 7:36 AM, George Leppla wrote:
> On 1/21/2015 1:56 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> >Kill-files are just a tool to help me separate the wheat from the >>> chaff, >>> >the good posters from the ones who don't add anything to my life. >>> > >>> >George L > >> It's a very small price to pay for free speech. As they say - "Freedom >> isn't free!" > > > Even a small price is too much to pay when I am getting something I > don't want, like or need. > > I saw this morning that there were over 150 posts to download but I only > got 104 of them... the rest were deleted. This newsgroup becomes more > valuable to me when I can eliminate 1/3 of the posts that are from > people I don't care to read. > > There might have been a gem in the pile of posts that were deleted, but > the people who make their way into my kill-file generally post things > that are more like a lump of coal than a diamond > > George L > > Try and warm yourself up with a diamond on a cold night! -- Xeno. |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
|
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
|
KF'd all you lazy non-trimmers
On 2015-01-19 18:03:01 +0000, Sqwertz said:
> On 19 Jan 2015 15:16:32 GMT, notbob wrote: > >> It works! Yay. >> >> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if >> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting >> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be >> eliminatied from my view. > > That sounds like a threat. Oh No! Not The Wrath of notbob's > Killfile! Wouldn't it be easier just to killfile everything except the 3 or 4 prefered participants? -- Food good! Fire BAD!! - Frankenstein's Monster |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Who is too lazy to... | General Cooking | |||
| Big Jim's Lazy-Q FAQ | Barbecue | |||
| Big Jim's Lazy-Q FAQ | Barbecue | |||
| Big Jim's Lazy-Q FAQ | Barbecue | |||
| Just how lazy have we become? | General Cooking | |||
![Dave Smith[_1_] is offline](https://www.foodbanter.com/images/SultanThemeVB3R/statusicon/user_offline.gif)
Linear Mode
