It works! Yay.

I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
eliminatied from my view.

For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:

[rec.food.cooking]
Sco: =-9999
Lines: 50

......should do the trick. Works fer me!

nb

On 1/19/2015 9:16 AM, notbob wrote:
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> eliminatied from my view.
>
> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
> [rec.food.cooking]
> Sco: =-9999
> Lines: 50
>
> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!


Cool! Thunderbird doesn't have that feature.

I KF'd a few people recently for the same reason and it is a whole lot
nicer going through this group. Less wasted time.

I don't feel like I am missing anything but I've never been one of those
people who has to ready every post.

George L

On 19 Jan 2015 15:16:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:

>It works! Yay.
>
>I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>eliminatied from my view.
>
>For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
>[rec.food.cooking]
>Sco: =-9999
>Lines: 50
>
>.....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
>nb


With Agent I just "ignore" and have it set to ignore any replies to
that posting. Then I set my view to "not ignored." The messages are
still there if I decide I want to see it. I only keep messages for 15
days. It is also set to move to "the next unread message." I can
also do an "ignore" on the fly it the subject or poster gets too far
off.

Makes life much easier.
--
Susan N.

"Moral indignation is in most cases two percent moral,
48 percent indignation, and 50 percent envy."
Vittorio De Sica, Italian movie director (1901-1974)

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> eliminatied from my view.
>
> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
> [rec.food.cooking]
> Sco: =-9999
> Lines: 50
>
> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
> nb

Public plonking is childish. LOL

Cheri

On 20/01/2015 4:20 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
>> It works! Yay.
>>
>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>> eliminatied from my view.
>>
>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>>
>> [rec.food.cooking]
>> Sco: =-9999
>> Lines: 50
>>
>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>>
>> nb
>
> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>
> Cheri

It's called "asserting control"...

No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)

--

Xeno.

"Xeno" > wrote in message
...

>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> It's called "asserting control"...
>
> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)

That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is just as
simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or not? Myself, I
will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of text if I care what a
poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after one turn of the mouse
wheel. :-)

Cheri

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 10:16:36 AM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines.

If this applies to 50 lines of original posting, then for sure you will eliminate certain ppl. Ha. Darn, you're gonna miss all those sagas from Washington state.

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Xeno" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> It's called "asserting control"...
>>
>> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)
>
> That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is just
> as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or not? Myself,
> I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of text if I care what
> a poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after one turn of the mouse
> wheel. :-)

But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you do
that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand that!!!

;-)




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 20/01/2015 5:38 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Xeno" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> It's called "asserting control"...
>>>
>>> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)
>>
>> That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is
>> just as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or
>> not? Myself, I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of
>> text if I care what a poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after
>> one turn of the mouse wheel. :-)
>
> But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you do
> that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand that!!!
>
> ;-)
>
Indeed. I would be soooo devastated if bob wasn't reading my posts!


--

Xeno.

On 19 Jan 2015 15:16:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:

>It works! Yay.
>
>I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>eliminatied from my view.
>
>For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
>[rec.food.cooking]
>Sco: =-9999
>Lines: 50
>
>.....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
>nb

A few days ago I posted a recipe that was 79 lines long. Oh well, so
long, nice knowing you

koko

--

Food is our common ground, a universal experience
James Beard

On 20/01/2015 6:08 AM, koko wrote:
> On 19 Jan 2015 15:16:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>
>> It works! Yay.
>>
>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>> eliminatied from my view.
>>
>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>>
>> [rec.food.cooking]
>> Sco: =-9999
>> Lines: 50
>>
>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>>
>> nb
>
> A few days ago I posted a recipe that was 79 lines long. Oh well, so
> long, nice knowing you
>
> koko
>
> --

It's worse than that actually. The header section of a post can be 20
lines of text and that's before you get into what it was you were
posting. Wonder if bob's KillFile has enough "intelligence" to be able
to differentiate a header from body text???


--

Xeno.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message

>> That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is just
>> as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or not?
>> Myself, I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of text if I
>> care what a poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after one turn of
>> the mouse wheel. :-)
>
> But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you do
> that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand that!!!
>
> ;-)

Sorry, what was I thinking!!! :-)

Cheri

"Xeno" > wrote in message
...
> On 20/01/2015 5:38 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>> "Xeno" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> It's called "asserting control"...
>>>>
>>>> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)
>>>
>>> That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is
>>> just as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or
>>> not? Myself, I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of
>>> text if I care what a poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after
>>> one turn of the mouse wheel. :-)
>>
>> But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you do
>> that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand that!!!
>>
>> ;-)
>>
> Indeed. I would be soooo devastated if bob wasn't reading my posts!

Nodnodnod *sigh* but, it is notbob dontchaknow?
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 12:13:47 PM UTC-7, Xeno wrote:
<snippage>

> It's worse than that actually. The header section of a post can be 20
> lines of text and that's before you get into what it was you were
> posting. Wonder if bob's KillFile has enough "intelligence" to be able
> to differentiate a header from body text???
>
> Xeno.

Who gives a red rat's ass if it does or doesn't...that is notbob's problem.
If he doesn't want to read long postings then wtf cares?
Let him read the short ones if his time is so precious.
=====

On 2015-01-19, Xeno > wrote:

> It's worse than that actually. The header section of a post can be 20
> lines of text and that's before you get into what it was you were
> posting. Wonder if bob's KillFile has enough "intelligence" to be able
> to differentiate a header from body text???

So far.

Only Ophelia has a weird effect on my newsreader. She routinely posts
100+ lines of quotes w/ a single reply line, yet her articles somehow
always list her new lines, but not the quote lines, like all other
articles on rfc. Not sure how she does it --I doubt she knows-- so I
jes KF her on GPs (no offense).

As for me announcing it, so what. I was giving other readers the info
they might use to do the same thing. I don't typically announce
plonks and I'm experienced enough to know when someone posts a good
recipe that may go over 50 lines and I will read it. If I wanted
koko's recipe, I've already got it.

What with all the crap ppl put in their posts and all the non-standard
formatting by GGs and mobile devices, I'm jes happy I'm able to KF by
this one criteria.

nb

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>
>>> That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is just
>>> as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or not?
>>> Myself, I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines of text if I
>>> care what a poster is saying, but mostly just skipping after one turn of
>>> the mouse wheel. :-)
>>
>> But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you do
>> that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand that!!!
>>
>> ;-)
>
> Sorry, what was I thinking!!! :-)

*chuckle*


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"koko" > wrote in message
news
> On 19 Jan 2015 15:16:32 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>
>>It works! Yay.
>>
>>I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>>you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>>the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>>eliminatied from my view.
>>
>>For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>>
>>[rec.food.cooking]
>>Sco: =-9999
>>Lines: 50
>>
>>.....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>>
>>nb
>
> A few days ago I posted a recipe that was 79 lines long. Oh well, so
> long, nice knowing you

And very good it was too. Don't worry koko, that is their loss.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2015-01-19 2:50 PM, notbob wrote:
It's worse than that actually. The header section of a post can be 20
>> lines of text and that's before you get into what it was you were
>> posting. Wonder if bob's KillFile has enough "intelligence" to be able
>> to differentiate a header from body text???
>
> So far.
>
> Only Ophelia has a weird effect on my newsreader. She routinely posts
> 100+ lines of quotes w/ a single reply line, yet her articles somehow
> always list her new lines, but not the quote lines, like all other
> articles on rfc. Not sure how she does it --I doubt she knows-- so I
> jes KF her on GPs (no offense).
>
> As for me announcing it, so what. I was giving other readers the info
> they might use to do the same thing. I don't typically announce
> plonks and I'm experienced enough to know when someone posts a good
> recipe that may go over 50 lines and I will read it. If I wanted
> koko's recipe, I've already got it.
>
> What with all the crap ppl put in their posts and all the non-standard
> formatting by GGs and mobile devices, I'm jes happy I'm able to KF by
> this one criteria.
>


I took a slightly different approach. I KFed those who routinely post
those 100 lines of untrimmed crap and then add little or nothing at the
end.

Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> >"Xeno" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > > > Public plonking is childish. LOL
> > > >
> > > > Cheri
> > >
> > > It's called "asserting control"...
> > >
> > > No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)
> >
> > That's the childish part of it IMO, not reading posters at times is
> > just as simple, and really...who cares if someone killfiles you or
> > not? Myself, I will scroll to the bottom through lines and lines
> > of text if I care what a poster is saying, but mostly just
> > skipping after one turn of the mouse wheel. :-)
>
> But, but, but you can't let people know how important you are if you
> do that!! Honestly, Cheri I thought you at least would understand
> that!!!
>
> ;-)

Children KF publically. Real people do not bother to mention it. They
just skip by and go on posting to posts of interest.

--

On 1/19/15 12:20 PM, Cheri wrote:

> Public plonking is childish. LOL

Disagree. It's simply a way of expressing disapproval, and encouraging
others to do the same.

It's kinda like the old Gallagher routine, when he'd ride onto the stage
on a tricycle with a car door mounted on it, lean on the door, and do
his monologue.

He suggested giving everyone a suction cup dart gun, to shoot at other
cars whenever they saw the drivers doing something stupid. Then,
whenever a cop saw a car with three or more darts on it, he'd pull it
over and give the driver a ticket for being an asshole.

-- Larry

On 1/19/2015 9:16 AM, notbob wrote:
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> eliminatied from my view.
>
> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
> [rec.food.cooking]
> Sco: =-9999
> Lines: 50
>
> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
> nb
>
Ask me if I care.

--
From somewhere very deep in the heart of Texas

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 9:21:44 AM UTC-8, Cheri wrote:
> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
> > It works! Yay.
> >
> > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> > eliminatied from my view.
> >
> > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
> >
> > [rec.food.cooking]
> > Sco: =-9999
> > Lines: 50
> >
> > .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
> >
> > nb
>
> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>
> Cheri

(Piggybacking)And anyone posting any number of lines of off-topic whining
deserves a spot in my kill file.

When was the last post nb made that had to do with food, anyways?

On 1/19/2015 3:30 PM, wrote:
> When was the last post nb made that had to do with food, anyways?

Within the last few days. Martha White cornbread mix and homemade
oyster crackers, just to name two. Do try to keep up.

Jill

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...

> Children KF publically. Real people do not bother to mention it. They
> just skip by and go on posting to posts of interest.

Truly!

Cheri

"pltrgyst" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/19/15 12:20 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>
> Disagree. It's simply a way of expressing disapproval, and encouraging
> others to do the same.

As if others can't think for themselves without *encouragement* from a
disgruntled poster. A person can express disapproval with out the plonk
silliness IMO.

Cheri

"Janet Wilder" > wrote in message
eb.com...
> On 1/19/2015 9:16 AM, notbob wrote:
>> It works! Yay.
>>
>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>> eliminatied from my view.
>>
>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>>
>> [rec.food.cooking]
>> Sco: =-9999
>> Lines: 50
>>
>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>>
>> nb
>>
> Ask me if I care.

LOL

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "pltrgyst" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 1/19/15 12:20 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>
>> Disagree. It's simply a way of expressing disapproval, and encouraging
>> others to do the same.
>
> As if others can't think for themselves without *encouragement* from a
> disgruntled poster. A person can express disapproval with out the plonk
> silliness IMO.

Sometimes I plonk, sometimes I just ignore. No one ever knows which it is.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> eliminatied from my view.
>
> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
> [rec.food.cooking]
> Sco: =-9999
> Lines: 50
>
> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
> nb

Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!
Good Job!

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 12:43:25 PM UTC-8, jmcquown wrote:
> On 1/19/2015 3:30 PM, wrote:
> > When was the last post nb made that had to do with food, anyways?
>
> Within the last few days. Martha White cornbread mix and homemade
> oyster crackers, just to name two. Do try to keep up.
>

The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even
a Brokelyn post. What next? "Has anyone ever mined their own salt?"?

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote:
> "notbob" > wrote in message
> ...
> > It works! Yay.
> >
> > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> > eliminatied from my view.
> >
> > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
> >
> > [rec.food.cooking]
> > Sco: =-9999
> > Lines: 50
> >
> > .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
> >
> > nb
>
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!
> Good Job!

Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have some kind of a repeat function?

Sqwertz wrote:
>
>Per the RFC, the Lines: header, when present, is only supposed to be a
>count of the lines in the body of the article.

The only pussy're the dwarf is ever gonna get, Little Candy & Friend:
http://i61.tinypic.com/9jn210.jpg

spamtrap wrote:
>
>The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even
>a Brokelyn post.

Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this
Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin.

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:04:44 +1100, Xeno >
wrote:

> On 20/01/2015 4:20 AM, Cheri wrote:
> >
> > "notbob" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> It works! Yay.
> >>
> >> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> >> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> >> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> >> eliminatied from my view.
> >>
> >> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
> >>
> >> [rec.food.cooking]
> >> Sco: =-9999
> >> Lines: 50
> >>
> >> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
> >>
> >> nb
> >
> > Public plonking is childish. LOL
> >
> > Cheri
>
> It's called "asserting control"...
>
> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)

Boring boasting.

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:01:15 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:20:41 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Public plonking is childish. LOL
>
> Yes, bragging about your killfile, does it get any lamer?

+1

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room

On 20/01/2015 10:01 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:04:44 +1100, Xeno >
> wrote:
>
>> On 20/01/2015 4:20 AM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> "notbob" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> It works! Yay.
>>>>
>>>> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
>>>> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
>>>> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
>>>> eliminatied from my view.
>>>>
>>>> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>>>>
>>>> [rec.food.cooking]
>>>> Sco: =-9999
>>>> Lines: 50
>>>>
>>>> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>>>>
>>>> nb
>>>
>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> It's called "asserting control"...
>>
>> No good if no one knows you are doing it. ;-)
>
> Boring boasting.
>
That's a more accurate description.. ;-)

Am I up to 50 lines yet?

--

Xeno.

On 20/01/2015 10:03 PM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 08:01:15 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:20:41 -0800, "Cheri" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Public plonking is childish. LOL
>>
>> Yes, bragging about your killfile, does it get any lamer?
>
> +1
>
+2

--

Xeno.

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> spamtrap wrote:
>>
>>The oyster crackers were the worst sort of trolling, worse than even
>>a Brokelyn post.
>
> Compared to what the spermtrap's babbling contributes to this
> Newsgroup the Bove is Jaques Pepin.

haha spermtrap good one

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:16:36 AM UTC-10, notbob wrote:
> It works! Yay.
>
> I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> eliminatied from my view.
>
> For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
>
> [rec.food.cooking]
> Sco: =-9999
> Lines: 50
>
> .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
>
> nb

I suspect that people will still continue to not trim or you might even be encouraging people to behave horribly. OTOH, your optimism is truly inspirational.

On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 2:10:20 PM UTC-10, Kalmia wrote:
> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:06:26 PM UTC-5, Pico Rico wrote:
> > "notbob" > wrote in message
> > ...
> > > It works! Yay.
> > >
> > > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> > > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> > > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> > > eliminatied from my view.
> > >
> > > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
> > >
> > > [rec.food.cooking]
> > > Sco: =-9999
> > > Lines: 50
> > >
> > > .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
> > >
> > > nb
> >
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
> > Good Job!
>
> Haw - haw. Did you have to hand-type all of that, or do you have some kind of a repeat function?

My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-) My guess is that you could copy and paste out a phrase a million times in 20 steps. I wouldn't do that but I'm game enough for 4 steps though. :-)

On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 12:59:04 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

> On Monday, January 19, 2015 at 5:16:36 AM UTC-10, notbob wrote:
> > It works! Yay.
> >
> > I have modified my score file to KF all posts over 50 lines. IOW, if
> > you refuse to trim the previous _________(insert number) ppl quoting
> > the last _______(insert number) articles, you willl henceforth be
> > eliminatied from my view.
> >
> > For ppl using slrn, Xnews, or Pan:
> >
> > [rec.food.cooking]
> > Sco: =-9999
> > Lines: 50
> >
> > .....should do the trick. Works fer me!
> >
> > nb
>
> I suspect that people will still continue to not trim or you might even be encouraging people to behave horribly. OTOH, your optimism is truly inspirational.

Either that or he could hold his breath until they stop.

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room