Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I cooked *Australian* lamb shoulder chops tonight and yes, they were just as mild as they were before - so it wasn't an enigma for this grocery chain. I made a mint chermoula, but didn't marinate the lamb in it because I didn't know how strong the taste of mint would be (hubby hates mint). The mint was spearmint ( and it looks like the same mint I see on the side of Vietnamese Pho), thankfully, it didn't overwhelm the cilantro + parsley, lemon and garlic. I also added ground cumin seed and coriander. Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real compliment. Yes, it was delicious. http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > > I cooked *Australian* lamb shoulder chops tonight and yes, they were > just as mild as they were before - so it wasn't an enigma for this > grocery chain. > > I made a mint chermoula, but didn't marinate the lamb in it because I > didn't know how strong the taste of mint would be (hubby hates mint). > The mint was spearmint ( and it looks like the same mint I see on the > side of Vietnamese Pho), thankfully, it didn't overwhelm the cilantro > + parsley, lemon and garlic. I also added ground cumin seed and > coriander. > > Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. > > Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real > compliment. Yes, it was delicious. > > http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg Excellent! Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:27:37 -0800, sf > wrote:
> >I cooked *Australian* lamb shoulder chops tonight and yes, they were >just as mild as they were before - so it wasn't an enigma for this >grocery chain. > >I made a mint chermoula, but didn't marinate the lamb in it because I >didn't know how strong the taste of mint would be (hubby hates mint). >The mint was spearmint ( and it looks like the same mint I see on the >side of Vietnamese Pho), thankfully, it didn't overwhelm the cilantro >+ parsley, lemon and garlic. I also added ground cumin seed and >coriander. > >Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. > >Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real >compliment. Yes, it was delicious. > >http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg You cut up the chops, for hubby or for the camera? ![]() It's well done of course, shoulder chops require a lot of surgery. Hope you saved the marrow! I like the lamb so much, I've never found any sauce to go with it, sometimes a little mustard, better yet tzatziki or tahini, or maybe one or another bbq sauces, but usually just the meat and sides. J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:30:56 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:27:37 -0800, sf > wrote: > > > > >Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. > > > >Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real > >compliment. Yes, it was delicious. > > > >http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg > > You cut up the chops, for hubby or for the camera? ![]() I never plop a big hunk of uncut meat on the plate, if that's what you're asking. It's always sliced. It's also common knowledge on rfc that I hate bones, so I remove them (often before cooking and always before plating). -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:10:44 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 10:30:56 -0800, JRStern > >wrote: > >> On Thu, 05 Feb 2015 22:27:37 -0800, sf > wrote: >> >> > >> >Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. >> > >> >Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real >> >compliment. Yes, it was delicious. >> > >> >http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg >> >> You cut up the chops, for hubby or for the camera? ![]() > >I never plop a big hunk of uncut meat on the plate, if that's what >you're asking. It's always sliced. It's also common knowledge on rfc >that I hate bones, so I remove them (often before cooking and always >before plating). I've never paid much attention to "plating" for home cooking. And for ribs and chops and such, gnawing the bones is part of the fun, well, unless you're serving them on a fancy dress occassion. So you discarded that round bone in the chop, or you cooked it and removed the marrow and put it on the plate with a ribbon on it? I'm suddenly hungry for some lamb shoulder chops ... J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:44:05 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > So you discarded that round bone in the chop, or you cooked it and > removed the marrow and put it on the plate with a ribbon on it? Basically, yes. They were blades, not the round bone. I hate marrow, so I really don't care what happens to it. Bones stay on the cutting board and hubby is free to gnaw later. Actually he doesn't gnaw, he uses a knife with surgical precision. I do let him know if I'm saving them for stock and he won't touch them. The last lamb bones became stock, but I only used it for one thing and ended up throwing the rest out. > I'm suddenly hungry for some lamb shoulder chops ... They were delicious. I love lamb so it's nice to find it well under $10 lb. Try chermoula sometime. You can use it as a marinade or a condiment. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 12:47:57 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 11:44:05 -0800, JRStern > >wrote: > >> So you discarded that round bone in the chop, or you cooked it and >> removed the marrow and put it on the plate with a ribbon on it? > >Basically, yes. They were blades, not the round bone. I hate marrow, >so I really don't care what happens to it. Bones stay on the cutting >board and hubby is free to gnaw later. Actually he doesn't gnaw, he >uses a knife with surgical precision. I do let him know if I'm saving >them for stock and he won't touch them. The last lamb bones became >stock, but I only used it for one thing and ended up throwing the rest >out. > >> I'm suddenly hungry for some lamb shoulder chops ... > >They were delicious. I love lamb so it's nice to find it well under >$10 lb. Try chermoula sometime. You can use it as a marinade or a >condiment. Well, the local Ralphs had some blade-style at "only" $8.99/pound, but they look to be pretty boney. I'll see tonight. Adjacent veal chops cost more but seemed much meatier ... not something I've ever tried, but maybe I will. J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:05:26 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > Well, the local Ralphs had some blade-style at "only" $8.99/pound, but > they look to be pretty boney. I'll see tonight. Adjacent veal chops > cost more but seemed much meatier ... not something I've ever tried, > but maybe I will. > This was Safeway. I *think* they were$6.99 lb (full price), so check there too. Veal chops are great. Back in the day, I used to buy the ones that had a piece of kidney in them because they were less expensive - they were very tasty. I've said this before and I'll say it again. I used to be able to find both breast of veal and breast of lamb to stuff (inexpensive). Haven't seen either of those in a very long time. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/7/2015 2:22 AM, sf wrote:
> > I've said this before and I'll say it again. I used to be able to > find both breast of veal and breast of lamb to stuff (inexpensive). > Haven't seen either of those in a very long time. > > I've not seen the breast of veal in over 10 years now. Slow cooked in tomato sauce it was fantastic. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>On 2/7/2015 2:22 AM, sf wrote: > >> >> I've said this before and I'll say it again. I used to be able to >> find both breast of veal and breast of lamb to stuff (inexpensive). >> Haven't seen either of those in a very long time. >> >> > >I've not seen the breast of veal in over 10 years now. Slow cooked in >tomato sauce it was fantastic. A very fatty cut which is why the low price, more than half is fat. Braised breast of veal was very popular during the '50s, my mother made it often. Teliatyna z Pidlyvoiu Iz Ikry (Braised Veal With Caviar Sauce). To serve 6 to 8. 3 tablespoons of butter. 1 cup of thinly sliced onions. 1 carrot, scraped and cut into 1/ 2 inch rounds. 4 sprigs of parsley. 2 stalks of celery with their leaves, cut into 2-inch lengths. 3 bay leaves. 3 whole cloves. 1 tablespoon of finely chopped lemon peel. 3 tablespoons of vegetable oil. 3 1/ 2 to 4-pounds of boneless veal and securely tied. 1 cup of dry white wine (Sauvignon Blanc). Salt Freshly ground black pepper 2 teaspoons of potato starch dissolved in 2 tablespoons of cold water. 2 tablespoons (1 ounce) black caviar. 1/8 teaspoon of fresh lemon juice. In a heavy 6-quart casserole, melt the butter over high heat. Add the onions, carrot, parsley, celery, bay leaves, cloves and lemon peel and cover the pan. Lower the heat and simmer for about 15 minutes, until the vegetables are soft but not brown. Set aside. Preheat the oven to 325° F. In a heavy 10- to 12-inch skillet, heat the 3 tablespoons of oil over high heat until a light haze forms above it. Add the veal and brown for 8 to 10 minutes, turning it every 2 or 3 minutes so that it browns evenly on all sides. Then place it on top of the vegetables in the casserole and pour in the wine. Bring to a boil over high heat, sprinkle the meat liberally with salt and a few grindings of black pepper and cover the casserole tightly. Braise in the center of the oven for 1 1/ 4 hours, turning the veal over after 45 minutes. When the veal is tender, transfer it to a heated platter, cut away the strings and carve the meat into 1/4 inch-thick slices. Arrange them, slightly overlapping, down the center of a large platter and cover the platter loosely with foil to keep the meat warm while you make the sauce. Quickly strain the entire contents of the casserole through a fine sieve into a bowl, pressing down hard on the vegetables with the back of a large spoon before discarding them. Skim off any surface fat and return the braised juices to the casserole. Stir in the dissolved potato starch. Then bring the sauce to a boil over high heat, stirring constantly until it is lightly thickened and smooth. Reduce the heat to low and gently stir in the caviar and lemon juice and taste for seasoning. Pour in the sauce over the veal and serve at once, or if you prefer, serve the sauce separately. ••• |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:15:01 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote: >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: > >>On 2/7/2015 2:22 AM, sf wrote: >> >>> >>> I've said this before and I'll say it again. I used to be able to >>> find both breast of veal and breast of lamb to stuff (inexpensive). >>> Haven't seen either of those in a very long time. >>> >>> >> >>I've not seen the breast of veal in over 10 years now. Slow cooked in >>tomato sauce it was fantastic. > >A very fatty cut which is why the low price, more than half is fat. >Braised breast of veal was very popular during the '50s, my mother >made it often. > >Teliatyna z Pidlyvoiu Iz Ikry (Braised Veal With Caviar Sauce). > >To serve 6 to 8. > >3 tablespoons of butter. >1 cup of thinly sliced onions. >1 carrot, scraped and cut into 1/ 2 inch rounds. >4 sprigs of parsley. >2 stalks of celery with their leaves, cut into 2-inch lengths. >3 bay leaves. >3 whole cloves. >1 tablespoon of finely chopped lemon peel. >3 tablespoons of vegetable oil. >3 1/ 2 to 4-pounds of boneless veal and securely tied. >1 cup of dry white wine (Sauvignon Blanc). >Salt >Freshly ground black pepper >2 teaspoons of potato starch dissolved in 2 tablespoons of cold water. >2 tablespoons (1 ounce) black caviar. >1/8 teaspoon of fresh lemon juice. > >In a heavy 6-quart casserole, melt the butter over high heat. >Add the onions, carrot, parsley, celery, bay leaves, cloves and >lemon peel and cover the pan. Lower the heat and simmer for >about 15 minutes, until the vegetables are soft but not brown. >Set aside. > >Preheat the oven to 325° F. In a heavy 10- to 12-inch skillet, >heat the 3 tablespoons of oil over high heat until a light haze >forms above it. Add the veal and brown for 8 to 10 minutes, >turning it every 2 or 3 minutes so that it browns evenly on all >sides. Then place it on top of the vegetables in the casserole >and pour in the wine. Bring to a boil over high heat, sprinkle the >meat liberally with salt and a few grindings of black pepper and >cover the casserole tightly. Braise in the center of the oven >for 1 1/ 4 hours, turning the veal over after 45 minutes. > >When the veal is tender, transfer it to a heated platter, cut >away the strings and carve the meat into 1/4 inch-thick slices. >Arrange them, slightly overlapping, down the center of a large >platter and cover the platter loosely with foil to keep the meat >warm while you make the sauce. > >Quickly strain the entire contents of the casserole through a fine >sieve into a bowl, pressing down hard on the vegetables with the >back of a large spoon before discarding them. Skim off any >surface fat and return the braised juices to the casserole. >Stir in the dissolved potato starch. Then bring the sauce to a boil >over high heat, stirring constantly until it is lightly thickened and >smooth. Reduce the heat to low and gently stir in the caviar and >lemon juice and taste for seasoning. Pour in the sauce over the veal >and serve at once, or if you prefer, serve the sauce separately. > That sounds fantastic, thanks! Can't recall that I've really had much veal other than in Italian style cutlets parmigiana or saltimboca. Then about a year ago I did have a veal chop somewhere and thought it was excellent and have been meaning to get back on that. J. ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've lost track of who sells what. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:15:01 -0500, Brooklyn1 > wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:06:24 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote: >> >>>On 2/7/2015 2:22 AM, sf wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I've said this before and I'll say it again. I used to be able to >>>> find both breast of veal and breast of lamb to stuff (inexpensive). >>>> Haven't seen either of those in a very long time. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>I've not seen the breast of veal in over 10 years now. Slow cooked in >>>tomato sauce it was fantastic. >> >>A very fatty cut which is why the low price, more than half is fat. >>Braised breast of veal was very popular during the '50s, my mother >>made it often. >> >>Teliatyna z Pidlyvoiu Iz Ikry (Braised Veal With Caviar Sauce). >> >>To serve 6 to 8. >> >>3 tablespoons of butter. >>1 cup of thinly sliced onions. >>1 carrot, scraped and cut into 1/ 2 inch rounds. >>4 sprigs of parsley. >>2 stalks of celery with their leaves, cut into 2-inch lengths. >>3 bay leaves. >>3 whole cloves. >>1 tablespoon of finely chopped lemon peel. >>3 tablespoons of vegetable oil. >>3 1/ 2 to 4-pounds of boneless veal and securely tied. >>1 cup of dry white wine (Sauvignon Blanc). >>Salt >>Freshly ground black pepper >>2 teaspoons of potato starch dissolved in 2 tablespoons of cold water. >>2 tablespoons (1 ounce) black caviar. >>1/8 teaspoon of fresh lemon juice. >> >>In a heavy 6-quart casserole, melt the butter over high heat. >>Add the onions, carrot, parsley, celery, bay leaves, cloves and >>lemon peel and cover the pan. Lower the heat and simmer for >>about 15 minutes, until the vegetables are soft but not brown. >>Set aside. >> >>Preheat the oven to 325° F. In a heavy 10- to 12-inch skillet, >>heat the 3 tablespoons of oil over high heat until a light haze >>forms above it. Add the veal and brown for 8 to 10 minutes, >>turning it every 2 or 3 minutes so that it browns evenly on all >>sides. Then place it on top of the vegetables in the casserole >>and pour in the wine. Bring to a boil over high heat, sprinkle the >>meat liberally with salt and a few grindings of black pepper and >>cover the casserole tightly. Braise in the center of the oven >>for 1 1/ 4 hours, turning the veal over after 45 minutes. >> >>When the veal is tender, transfer it to a heated platter, cut >>away the strings and carve the meat into 1/4 inch-thick slices. >>Arrange them, slightly overlapping, down the center of a large >>platter and cover the platter loosely with foil to keep the meat >>warm while you make the sauce. >> >>Quickly strain the entire contents of the casserole through a fine >>sieve into a bowl, pressing down hard on the vegetables with the >>back of a large spoon before discarding them. Skim off any >>surface fat and return the braised juices to the casserole. >>Stir in the dissolved potato starch. Then bring the sauce to a boil >>over high heat, stirring constantly until it is lightly thickened and >>smooth. Reduce the heat to low and gently stir in the caviar and >>lemon juice and taste for seasoning. Pour in the sauce over the veal >>and serve at once, or if you prefer, serve the sauce separately. >> > >That sounds fantastic, thanks! > >Can't recall that I've really had much veal other than in Italian >style cutlets parmigiana or saltimboca. Then about a year ago I did >have a veal chop somewhere and thought it was excellent and have been >meaning to get back on that. > >J. Ground veal steaks are fantastic. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss > the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the > vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just > roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. > I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've > lost track of who sells what. That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > >wrote: > >> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss >> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the >> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just >> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. >> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've >> lost track of who sells what. > >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are different. Let's see ... http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ Look at the "arm shoulder chop". J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > >>wrote: >> >>> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss >>> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the >>> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just >>> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. >>> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've >>> lost track of who sells what. >> >>That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those >>recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I >>concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that >>because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a >>leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . > >I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are >different. Let's see ... > >http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ > >Look at the "arm shoulder chop". > >J. http://www.amateurgourmet.com/2012/0...the-money.html Here are some cooked, though I don't know about pan-cooking them, I bake/broil them and then use a sharper knife, the taste is great and they're not so tough if cooked rare-medium, with just enough heat that the fat sizzles. J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-02-06 06:27:37 +0000, sf said:
> I cooked *Australian* lamb shoulder chops tonight and yes, they were > just as mild as they were before - so it wasn't an enigma for this > grocery chain. > > I made a mint chermoula, but didn't marinate the lamb in it because I > didn't know how strong the taste of mint would be (hubby hates mint). > The mint was spearmint ( and it looks like the same mint I see on the > side of Vietnamese Pho), thankfully, it didn't overwhelm the cilantro > + parsley, lemon and garlic. I also added ground cumin seed and > coriander. > > Served with roasted potato slices and broccolini. > > Hubby said more than once: This tastes Greek! So that was a real > compliment. Yes, it was delicious. > > http://oi59.tinypic.com/2yv7w5h.jpg I love both shoulder and arm chops. Lamb is one of the last meats that they haven't figured out how to profitably hormone-ize and such. One can consider it, by default, organic. I like to make soups with the neck portion and shanks as well. As you know the coriander and garlic are natural with lamb. I also like to put a bunch of turmeric in - it is really good for you and always goes well with lamb. I have two arm chops that I am going to eat tonight, after marinading them in the whey from some yogurt I made the other day. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:56:18 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern > > wrote: > > >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: > > > >>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > > >>wrote: > >> > >>> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss > >>> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the > >>> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just > >>> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. > >>> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've > >>> lost track of who sells what. > >> > >>That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those > >>recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I > >>concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that > >>because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a > >>leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . > > > >I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are > >different. Let's see ... > > > >http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ > > > >Look at the "arm shoulder chop". > > > >J. > > http://www.amateurgourmet.com/2012/0...the-money.html > > Here are some cooked, though I don't know about pan-cooking them, I > bake/broil them and then use a sharper knife, the taste is great and > they're not so tough if cooked rare-medium, with just enough heat that > the fat sizzles. > > J. > FWIW, I saw the round bone (with marrow) shoulder chop at the store today. If I see a round bone, it's like the huge one (no marrow) in the URL above - I'd rather just buy the blade. In any case, I didn't want to buy more than two days worth of food and I just had lamb chops a couple of days ago, so I passed. ![]() -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: > > >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > > >wrote: > > > >> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss > >> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the > >> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just > >> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. > >> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've > >> lost track of who sells what. > > > >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those > >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I > >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that > >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a > >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . > > I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are > different. Let's see ... > > http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ > > Look at the "arm shoulder chop". > It was labeled "leg". That's all I know. It was pretty close to what was shown in www. http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/w...-leg-steak.jpg -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:25:33 -0800, sf > wrote:
>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern > >wrote: > >> On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: >> >> >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > >> >wrote: >> > >> >> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss >> >> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the >> >> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just >> >> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. >> >> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've >> >> lost track of who sells what. >> > >> >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those >> >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I >> >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that >> >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a >> >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . >> >> I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are >> different. Let's see ... >> >> http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ >> >> Look at the "arm shoulder chop". >> >It was labeled "leg". That's all I know. It was pretty close to what >was shown in www. >http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/w...-leg-steak.jpg Sure, leg steaks come with a section of bone, too. Just looked at TJ's, they have leg steaks and boneless chops for $11.25 a pound, and rack of lamb for more. Think I'll try one or another in the not too distant future! J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "JRStern" > wrote in message ... > On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:25:33 -0800, sf > wrote: > >>On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern > >>wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: >>> >>> >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > >>> >wrote: >>> > >>> >> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss >>> >> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the >>> >> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just >>> >> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. >>> >> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've >>> >> lost track of who sells what. >>> > >>> >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those >>> >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I >>> >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that >>> >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a >>> >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . >>> >>> I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are >>> different. Let's see ... >>> >>> http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ >>> >>> Look at the "arm shoulder chop". >>> >>It was labeled "leg". That's all I know. It was pretty close to what >>was shown in www. >>http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/w...-leg-steak.jpg > > Sure, leg steaks come with a section of bone, too. > > Just looked at TJ's, they have leg steaks and boneless chops for > $11.25 a pound, and rack of lamb for more. Think I'll try one or > another in the not too distant future! I have never seen a lamb with arms <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 09:41:59 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:25:33 -0800, sf > wrote: > > >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern > > >wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those > >> >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I > >> >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that > >> >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a > >> >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . > >> > >> I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are > >> different. Let's see ... > >> > >> http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ > >> > >> Look at the "arm shoulder chop". > >> > >It was labeled "leg". That's all I know. It was pretty close to what > >was shown in www. > >http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/w...-leg-steak.jpg > > Sure, leg steaks come with a section of bone, too. > > Just looked at TJ's, they have leg steaks and boneless chops for > $11.25 a pound, and rack of lamb for more. Think I'll try one or > another in the not too distant future! > I got mine at TJ's. Whatever you do, don't use too high heat. I wanted mine seared and the technique didn't work for me. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:24:35 -0800, sf > wrote:
>> Just looked at TJ's, they have leg steaks and boneless chops for >> $11.25 a pound, and rack of lamb for more. Think I'll try one or >> another in the not too distant future! >> > >I got mine at TJ's. Whatever you do, don't use too high heat. I >wanted mine seared and the technique didn't work for me. I usually roast them around 350, anywhere from 325 to 375 depending on my mood and rush, and might try what I did on the last, turn up the temperature at the end, just for a minute or two, rather than at the beginning. Probably wastes twenty-five cents in electricity (electric stove) heating the oven at the end, but so it goes. J. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, February 8, 2015 at 10:41:56 AM UTC-7, JRStern wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:25:33 -0800, sf > wrote: > > >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:45:01 -0800, JRStern > > >wrote: > > > >> On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 11:17:39 -0800, sf > wrote: > >> > >> >On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 08:44:32 -0800, JRStern > > >> >wrote: > >> > > >> >> ps - my lamb chop was great, bones no worse than average, but I miss > >> >> the style with the round bone with marrow. This came in the > >> >> vacuum-sealed style of package, one large-ish (12 ounces?) per. Just > >> >> roasted, then cut up and used in a salad with eggplant and beets. > >> >> I've been eating so little meat recently, especially at home, I've > >> >> lost track of who sells what. > >> > > >> >That would have been a slice off the leg. I cooked one of those > >> >recently and it was tough. Discussing it on a FB cooking group, I > >> >concluded that I'd cooked it too quickly. The person told me that > >> >because of the size, a boneless leg is cooks up tender, but searing a > >> >leg chop quickly toughens it. That's all I know, I don't know no mo . > >> > >> I'm not sure where things come from exactly, but the leg slices are > >> different. Let's see ... > >> > >> http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/p...-capabilities/ > >> > >> Look at the "arm shoulder chop". > >> > >It was labeled "leg". That's all I know. It was pretty close to what > >was shown in www. > >http://www.mountainstatesrosen.com/w...-leg-steak.jpg > > Sure, leg steaks come with a section of bone, too. > > Just looked at TJ's, they have leg steaks and boneless chops for > $11.25 a pound, and rack of lamb for more. Think I'll try one or > another in the not too distant future! > > J. Look for American or Canadian grown lamb...beats imported Australian or New Zealand lamb anytime. You'll pay more but its worth it IMO. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:47:28 -0800, JRStern >
wrote: > I usually roast them around 350, anywhere from 325 to 375 depending on > my mood and rush, and might try what I did on the last, turn up the > temperature at the end, just for a minute or two, rather than at the > beginning. Probably wastes twenty-five cents in electricity (electric > stove) heating the oven at the end, but so it goes. That's a good idea. There's something called a reverse sear where they put the meat in a slow oven until it's almost up to temp and then seared in a screaming hot pan. I don't think it works with any piece of meat thinner then 1 inch though. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lamb shoulder chops | General Cooking | |||
Lamb shoulder chops | General Cooking | |||
veal shoulder chops? | General Cooking | |||
veal shoulder blade chops | General Cooking |