Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() http://www.dw.de/the-hidden-facts-of...ion/a-17030868 THE HIDDEN FACTS OF EGG PRODUCTION "Ahead of this year's parliamentary elections, the German Greens party has called for an end to factory farming. During the industrial breeding of chickens, young chicks are often treated particularly badly, say critics. They're known as one-day chicks - baby chickens that never grow older than a day. Thousands of them are killed every day across Germany. The reason: they are male, so they won't lay any eggs, so feeding them up simply isn't economically viable. When chicks are hatched in industrial hatcheries, workers set to work, sorting the seething fluffy masses into male and female. The hens go onto the right-hand conveyor belt, are packed into boxes and sent to breeding farms. The cocks, meanwhile, end up on the left-hand conveyor belt, where a steel slide sends them to certain death. "There are chickens for fattening, and laying chickens, which lay a lot of eggs," explains Marius Tünte from German animal protection organization, Deutscher Tierschutzbund. "So the male chicks among the laying breeds don't have any economic value. That's why the decision was made at some point to kill all the male animals." Over 40 million animals are destroyed in this way every year in Germany - and around 2.5 billion worldwide. It's all part of increased specialization in the industrial farming sector, says Tünte. Shredded or gassed The male chicks are either chopped to pieces in a kind of chaffcutter fitted with multiple sharp knives, or gassed using carbon dioxide. "In both cases, the animals often have to suffer before finally dying," says Tünte. "In the chaffcutter, animals occasionally survive severely injured, and in the videos of the gassing you see clearly that the animals fight for air before they die." The dead chicks are then ground into animal meal before being burned. Some of the gassed chicks end up as feed for birds of prey in zoos - but, according to Deutscher Tierschutzbund, that only amounts to a few percent. It is only after the chicks have been sorted into male and female that the companies decide whether they are to be reared in a cage, or if they are to become "organic hens." Organic farmers buy their laying hens at the breeding farms too - so organic farms cannot opt out of the system. "At the moment, there are no alternatives to the market," Gerald Wehde, spokesman for the farming association Bioland, told DW. "All we can do is try to alleviate the situation a little." On top of this, farmers generally slaughter the laying hens as soon as they are a year old and begin to molt. Bioland advises its members to let their hens live a little longer, because they still lay eggs after molting, if not quite as many. If more hens were allowed to live into their second laying period, then farmers wouldn't have to buy as many laying hens, explains Wehde. "Then we could at least reduce the number of murdered chicks, if not actually stop it." BREAKING THE LAW? According to Paragraph 1 of Germany's Animal Protection Law, animals may only be killed for a useful reason. Animal protectionists, and indeed some lawyers, have their doubts about whether such a reason can be said to exist in the case of one-day chicks. And yet the practice is allowed to continue. An EU directive even regulates how the shredding and gassing of chicks is to be carried out - the chaffcutter is not allowed to be overloaded and the chicks are not allowed to be older than 72 hours old when killed. The German Ministry for Food, Agriculture, and Consumer Protection said, in reply to DW's request for a statement, that "the killing of male one-day chicks should be the last resort after all other possibilities for the use of the animals have been exhausted." But, according to industry, there is no other use for the animals, except for the unprofitable fattening. SOLUTIONS IN SIGHT? Most parties have now grasped that the killing of billions of chicks worldwide each year is neither practical nor morally defendable, even the breeding firms themselves. They incubate vast quantities of eggs every year for no useful reason, and have to dispose of the dead chicks afterwards. "No one, including the industry, actually wants to have to kill healthy male one-day chicks," says Maria-Elisabeth Krautwald-Junghanns, veterinarian and researcher at Leipzig University. She researches ways to potentially determine the sex of a chicken embryo even before it is hatched. She's hoping her research will mean that, in the future, only female embryos will be incubated. For chicken breeders and animal protectionists, the best solution would be to develop chicken breeds that can do both - the females lay eggs, while the males can be fattened. This was common before 1950. Sorting chicks on the basis of sex has become normal though now because high performance breeding is more efficient. In other countries, such as Italy or Switzerland, the concept of the dual-purpose chicken already exists as a niche product. In Germany it is about to be introduced to the market. Until then, consumers who want to boycott the killing of chicks have only one option, says Tünte, namely "to abstain or eat fewer egg-based products.." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Are you new to the party? This is old news re US egg production.
N |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-03-07 4:41 PM, sf wrote:
> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and > fattened up for the dinner table. > Maybe that's because that is what they do with them. A capon is castrated rooster, and those things are delicious. The cost more per pound than chicken but my experience is that there seems to be more meat per pound of bird. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 07/03/2015 2:41 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 12:32:13 -0800 (PST), > wrote: > >> >> http://www.dw.de/the-hidden-facts-of...ion/a-17030868 >> >> THE HIDDEN FACTS OF EGG PRODUCTION > > Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and > fattened up for the dinner table. > Those bred for efficient egg production are not bred for putting weight! Those bred for meat are not bred for efficient egg production! Graham -- "Excess on occasion is exhilarating. It prevents moderation from acquiring the deadening effect of habit." W. Somerset Maugham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/7/2015 9:06 PM, graham wrote:
> On 07/03/2015 2:41 PM, sf wrote: >> On Sat, 7 Mar 2015 12:32:13 -0800 (PST), >> wrote: >> >>> >>> http://www.dw.de/the-hidden-facts-of...ion/a-17030868 >>> >>> THE HIDDEN FACTS OF EGG PRODUCTION >> >> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and >> fattened up for the dinner table. >> > Those bred for efficient egg production are not bred for putting weight! > Those bred for meat are not bred for efficient egg production! > Graham > Sounds plausible but not strictly correct; see the Univ. of NC all-purpose chicken that can do all three: game hen, roaster and egg machine at different stages of life. -- Jim Silverton (Potomac, MD) Extraneous "not." in Reply To. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote:
> > Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and > fattened up for the dinner table. > Ever hear of a capon? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas >
wrote: > On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: > > > > > Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and > > fattened up for the dinner table. > > > > Ever hear of a capon? That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:18:54 -0700, sf > wrote:
>On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas > >wrote: > >> On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: >> >> > >> > Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and >> > fattened up for the dinner table. >> > >> >> Ever hear of a capon? > >That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see >them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? I've only ever seen them a few times in my life. It would be better than killing off chicks just because they are male. I guess they don't fit the production lines at the chicken factory. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 03/08/2015 10:18 AM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas > > wrote: > >> On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: >> >>> >>> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and >>> fattened up for the dinner table. >>> >> >> Ever hear of a capon? > > That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see > them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? > That's a different question entirely. I have little to no expertise in the matter but my opinion is that there's not that much of a demand. In all my years, I think I've seen capon offered in a grocery store only once. Its price was significantly higher than the regular fryers, which might have something to do with the lack of demand. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 11:42:53 -0700, Whirled Peas >
wrote: > On 03/08/2015 10:18 AM, sf wrote: > > On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas > > > wrote: > > > >> On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and > >>> fattened up for the dinner table. > >>> > >> > >> Ever hear of a capon? > > > > That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see > > them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? > > > That's a different question entirely. I have little to no expertise in > the matter but my opinion is that there's not that much of a demand. In > all my years, I think I've seen capon offered in a grocery store only > once. Its price was significantly higher than the regular fryers, which > might have something to do with the lack of demand. Given that chickens are so huge and expensive these days, I doubt there's a lack of demand. A chicken the size of a small turkey would be a good thing. -- A kitchen without a cook is just a room |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-03-08, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> I've only ever seen them a few times in my life. It would be better > than killing off chicks just because they are male. I guess they > don't fit the production lines at the chicken factory. No doubt chicken CAFOs suppliers have figured out yet another chemical method of inducing mostly female chicks. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-03-08 2:31 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:18:54 -0700, sf > wrote: > >> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas > >> wrote: >> >>> On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and >>>> fattened up for the dinner table. >>>> >>> >>> Ever hear of a capon? >> >> That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see >> them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? > > I've only ever seen them a few times in my life. It would be better > than killing off chicks just because they are male. I guess they > don't fit the production lines at the chicken factory. > Here is an interesting article about capons. I found another article that answered my question about what they do with most of the little boy chickens. There aren't many skilled caponizers, or farmers who are willing to provide the space or the extra time and expense of feeding them for 4 times longer than it takes to send a hen to market.... so they euthanize them. http://modernfarmer.com/2014/04/capo...urbing-luxury/ In 1913, farmer George Beuoy published a pamphlet titled €śWhats a Capon and Why.€ť He believed that the castrated cockerels €” which, without their testosterone, plump up to anywhere from 7 to 12 pounds €” could change the face of the struggling poultry industry. He believed in the possibility of capons so strongly that he began calling himself the €śCapon King€ť as he marketed mail-order cockerel and home castrating kits. Capons fetched four times the price per pound of a typical chicken, he wrote. They had value before slaughter, too: Capons would mother chicks better than hens while still retaining enough of a roosters fierceness to fight off hawks. If only farmers had the patience to learn €ścaponizing,€ť this particular form of castration, and let the birds grow long enough to develop their tender, distinctive flavor, capons would become €śthe life-giving, brain-forming, strength-producing food that is required by the high strung workingman of modern times,€ť Beuoy wrote. Obviously, he was wrong. Today, the capon has nearly disappeared from view. When capons pop up in stores or on restaurant menus, most modern diners assume that theyre game birds or perhaps akin to Cornish hens. But because hormonal changes caused by caponization allow more fat to build up both below the skin and within muscle, capons come with the promise of a substantial amount of buttery, tender meat. So why are they gone? It comes down to fact that the method to make a capon a capon is still the same as it was when Beuoys wrote €“ a process that may be an unfairly forgotten piece of agriculture, or simply a means to a somewhat disturbing luxury good. The caponizer searches for the testes, each about the size of a grain of rice, and rips them free of their connective tissue with a small slotted spoon €“ or, in some cases, a tool made out of a loop of horse hair. Bill Keough spent 20 years caponizing cockerels for Iowas Wapsie Produce, which dominated capon production before ceasing operations in 2010. To make a cockerel a capon, he explains, a caponizer must restrain the 3 to 6 week old bird by tying weights to its wings and feet to prevent movement and expose the rib cage. Then the caponizer cuts between the lowest two ribs of the bird and spreads them apart with a special tool to open up access to the body cavity. Last, the caponizer searches for the testes, each about the size of a grain of rice, and rips them free of their connective tissue with a small slotted spoon €“ or, in some cases, a tool made out of a loop of horse hair. This is the most difficult part: The testes are delicate, and its easy to only partially remove them, allowing some production of the male hormones that will result in a useless animal known as a €śsplit€ť €” not a rooster, not yet a capon. The testes are also next to a crucial artery and the kidneys, and damaging either could kill the bird. The incision is not sutured, and the entire process is done without anesthetics or antibiotics (though it should be said that neither anesthetics or antibiotics are used the more routine castration of cattle or pigs). When asked, Keough shrugs off concerns that the process could be done more safely or humanely. €śTheres not any other way to do it, and I dont think there should be,€ť he says. €śIf you do it right, it only takes a few seconds and the bird doesnt know what hit him.€ť By the time Keough mastered the process as a teenager, he could caponize 300 birds an hour. But to get it right? It took him two or three thousand attempts, he says. €śThere were plenty of dead chickens laying around,€ť he remembers. In other words, farming capons depends upon a highly-trained, well-paid specialists €” not the sort of assembly-line labor and mechanization on which the modern poultry industry runs. When Keough graduated from high school in the 1960s, he could charge $75 an hour for his services, he says. €śIf I did it now, I might get rich,€ť he adds, wistfully. €śBut I spent it all. Girls€¦€ť Even once the flocks have been caponized, they still present challenges to the contemporary farmer. Jim Schiltz, who owns specialty poultry processor Schiltz Foods, struggles to get his suppliers to meet even the modest demand for capons. FDA inspectors maintain extremely strict standards for what can be sold as a capon, and for flocks to make the grade, €śyou need to give them a little TLC. You need to give them a space. You need to feed them slow,€ť says Schiltz. If a bird isnt certified as a true capon, it can only be sold as one of those mammoth roasters that dont fetch a high enough price to justify raising the bird for 17 weeks (conventional chickens are often slaughtered after as few as four weeks). €śYou need to give them a little TLC. You need to give them a space. You need to feed them slow.€ť Schiltz says hes often at loggerheads with farmers €“ many dont bother to fill his orders, exasperated with the level of care required, while others cut corners, raising flocks where only half the birds can be sold as capons. €śTheyre crap, yknow. I dont even want them, hardly,€ť he says, sighing. €śTheres an art to doing this.€ť Schiltz could take the time to whip his farmers into shape, train more caponizers (he says he knows only six people up to that task) and modernize the process if there was stronger demand for the birds. But its always been a niche product, and the market has only shrunk. Wapsie at its peak processed 500,000 capons per year, and Schiltz estimates his annual capon production is a tenth of that. In contrast, American farms routinely produce more than 8 billion chickens each year. How is it that the capon has been left behind even as consumers demand a greater range of choice? Founder of specialty food brand Dartagnan Ariane Daguin believes its a question of demographics. A hundred years ago, when Beuoy prophesied a capon in every pot, American families averaged around five members, and so a seven to twelve pound bird was a reasonable size for a family meal. Now the average family has fewer than three members. So, says Daguin, €śthe capon is becoming obsolete.€ť She, like Schiltz, simply tries to service a lingering demand: Dartagnan sells fewer than 2,000 of its $89 French-style capons, fed milk and bread instead of grain, to the small number of European expatriates who dont traditionally eat turkey at holidays. I brined and roasted one of Jim Schiltzs 7.5 pound capons according to a simple recipe by Gabrielle Hamilton of New York Citys Prune restaurant, and the first taste was a revelation. The flavor was unusually rich and complex, distinct from any chicken or turkey Id had before, and the texture both moist and firm. After years of bland chickens and dried-out holiday turkeys, a taste of capon made me wish George Beuoys vision of the Capon of Tomorrow had come to pass. But developing a mass market for capons would require a Herculean marketing effort the producers currently show no inclination to undertake. And without that public awareness, its unlikely the same level of feel-good publicity that makes humanely raised chicken a supermarket staple will come to bear on the caponization process. With the limited prospects for their products, many capon producers dont bother touting the jaw-dropping taste of their birds. In the words of Jim Schiltz: €śIts just a chicken with its nuts cut off.€ť |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 15:21:37 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: >>>> Ever hear of a capon? >>> >>> That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see >>> them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? >> >> I've only ever seen them a few times in my life. It would be better >> than killing off chicks just because they are male. I guess they >> don't fit the production lines at the chicken factory. >> > >Here is an interesting article about capons. > >I found another article that answered my question about what they do >with most of the little boy chickens. There aren't many skilled >caponizers, or farmers who are willing to provide the space or the >extra time and expense of feeding them for 4 times longer than it takes >to send a hen to market.... so they euthanize them. > > > >http://modernfarmer.com/2014/04/capo...urbing-luxury/ > > >In 1913, farmer George Beuoy published a pamphlet titled “What’s a Capon >and Why.” Thanks for posting that, Dave. Seems to be a lot more involved than I thought. Explains the higher cost too. Reality is, when the store has chicken on sale for 79˘ a pound, the capon for $2.79 is not going to sell well. Most people don't appreciate the difference and will not pay for it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-03-08 3:12 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 11:42:53 -0700, Whirled Peas > > wrote: > >> On 03/08/2015 10:18 AM, sf wrote: >>> On Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:07:03 -0700, Whirled Peas > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 03/07/2015 01:41 PM, sf wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nobody has explained yet why the boy chicks aren't neutered and >>>>> fattened up for the dinner table. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Ever hear of a capon? >>> >>> That's exactly why I asked. I never see them in stores and never see >>> them on a menu. If they are being raised as capons, where are they? >>> >> That's a different question entirely. I have little to no expertise in >> the matter but my opinion is that there's not that much of a demand. In >> all my years, I think I've seen capon offered in a grocery store only >> once. Its price was significantly higher than the regular fryers, which >> might have something to do with the lack of demand. > > Given that chickens are so huge and expensive these days, I doubt > there's a lack of demand. A chicken the size of a small turkey would > be a good thing. > Capon costs 2-3times as much per pound as chicken. Some of us realize that there is more meat per pound and that it is much tastier. Most shoppers care only about price and they sure aren't as cheap as turkeys. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-03-08 3:33 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> In 1913, farmer George Beuoy published a pamphlet titled €śWhats a Capon >> and Why.€ť > > Thanks for posting that, Dave. Seems to be a lot more involved than I > thought. Explains the higher cost too. > > > Reality is, when the store has chicken on sale for 79¢ a pound, the > capon for $2.79 is not going to sell well. Most people don't > appreciate the difference and will not pay for it. > Yep. It is a big price difference and most people won't pay that much extra for what they thing is just a chicken. Well... it is a chicken but it is a much better chicken than one of those little hens. I will buy them if I find them because I know they are a superior product. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 8 Mar 2015 20:29:52 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >The Chinese certainly don't throw away the roosters. Here's a Chinese >street vendor holding a 60-second drive-in castration clinic right >there on the sidewalk. > >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wYkZlfmIgLw > >-sw He does vasectomy for only 20 yen more. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hidden MSG | General Cooking | |||
The culinary horrors of Mongolia | General Cooking | |||
Horrors: Crockpot Pulled Pork?? | Barbecue | |||
My green bean are too tough (horrors!) | General Cooking | |||
Arlington VA Atami shut down for rats and other horrors | Sushi |