Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bumble Bee Foods, 2 others charged after employee died in pressure cooker An employee burned to death inside an industrial pressure cooker at the Bumble Bee Foods plant in Santa Fe Springs in 2012. By Matt Hamilton contact the reporter Bumble Bee Foods and two of the tuna companys employees were charged Monday with willfully ignoring safety rules, leading to a plant worker burning to death inside an industrial pressure cooker in 2012, prosecutors said. The San Diego-based company, former safety manager Saul Florez, and Angel Rodriguez, the director of plant operations, were each charged with three felony counts of committing an occupational safety and health violation that caused a death, according to the Los Angeles County district attorneys office. On Oct. 11, 2012, Jose Melena, 62, entered a 35-foot oven at the companys Santa Fe Springs plant to make a repair inside the machine, which is used to sterilize thousands of cans of tuna at a time. Unaware that Melena was inside the oven, other plant workers loaded several carts that altogether held about 12,000 pounds of tuna, shut the door and turned on the oven, prosecutors said. Temperatures peaked at around 270 degrees, and Melena cooked to death, prosecutors said. His charred remains were found by another plant worker. In a statement, the company said it disagrees with and is "disappointed by the charges" filed by Los Angeles prosecutors. The company described Melena's death as a "tragic accident" and noted that an investigation by the California Division of Occupational Safety & Health "found no willful violations related to the accident. Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Jackie Lacey said in a statement that the charges against Bumble Bee Foods are part of her goal of enhancing the prosecution of workplace safety issues. "We take worker safety very seriously," Lacey said. €œAlthough the Bumble Bee investigation began in 2012, this case represents our commitment to protecting workers from illegal -- and, potentially, deadly -- on-the-job practices." Rodriguez, 63, remains employed by the company. It's unclear when Florez, 42, stopped working for Bumble Bee. Rodriguez, Florez and the company are scheduled to be arraigned May 27. If convicted, Rodriguez and Florez each face up to three years in prison and a $250,000 fine. The company could be fined up to $1.5 million. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 8:35:34 PM UTC-7, Travis McGee wrote:
> Bumble Bee Foods, 2 others charged after employee died in pressure cooker > > An employee burned to death inside an industrial pressure cooker at the > Bumble Bee Foods plant in Santa Fe Springs in 2012. > By Matt Hamilton contact the reporter > > Bumble Bee Foods and two of the tuna company's employees were charged > Monday with willfully ignoring safety rules, leading to a plant worker > burning to death inside an industrial pressure cooker in 2012, > prosecutors said. > > The San Diego-based company, former safety manager Saul Florez, and > Angel Rodriguez, the director of plant operations, were each charged > with three felony counts of committing an occupational safety and health > violation that caused a death, according to the Los Angeles County > district attorney's office. > > On Oct. 11, 2012, Jose Melena, 62, entered a 35-foot oven at the > company's Santa Fe Springs plant to make a repair inside the machine, > which is used to sterilize thousands of cans of tuna at a time. > > Unaware that Melena was inside the oven, other plant workers loaded > several carts that altogether held about 12,000 pounds of tuna, shut the > door and turned on the oven, prosecutors said. > > Temperatures peaked at around 270 degrees, and Melena cooked to death, > prosecutors said. His charred remains were found by another plant worker. > > In a statement, the company said it disagrees with and is "disappointed > by the charges" filed by Los Angeles prosecutors. The company described > Melena's death as a "tragic accident" and noted that an investigation by > the California Division of Occupational Safety & Health "found no > willful violations related to the accident. > There should have been one key to turn the heat on to that pressure cooker, and it should have been in the repair guy's pocket (Lock-out). A metal sign hung on the switch should have said: REPAIRMAN WORKING INSIDE. Further, there should be a last minute check for repair personnel before turning on the juice. But it occurs to me the repair guy committed suicide, to get his family the insurance money. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/28/2015 12:04 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:35:29 -0400, Travis McGee wrote: > >> Bumble Bee Foods, 2 others charged after employee died in pressure cooker >> >> An employee burned to death inside an industrial pressure cooker at the >> Bumble Bee Foods plant in Santa Fe Springs in 2012. >> By Matt Hamilton contact the reporter >> >> Bumble Bee Foods and two of the tuna company¢s employees were charged >> Monday with willfully ignoring safety rules, leading to a plant worker >> burning to death inside an industrial pressure cooker in 2012, >> prosecutors said. > > That was almost 3 years ago that Mark posted that? > > What I don't understand is that the crispy worker had to realize they > were filling up the oven with racks of tuna to be processed. So it > was probably a good time to GTF out of there. > > -sw > I think the important point here is that Bumble Bee doesn't want workers with good taste; they want workers who taste good. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/28/2015 12:33 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:19:49 -0400, Travis McGee wrote: > >> I think the important point here is that Bumble Bee doesn't want workers >> with good taste; they want workers who taste good. > > You were just waiting to use that when you made the OP. > > That was Starkist, BTW. > > -sw > Yes, that's true, but I couldn't help myself. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/2015 10:04 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> That was almost 3 years ago that Mark posted that? Do you need a refresher on your madness? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/2015 10:25 PM, The Other Guy wrote:
>> I think the important point here is that Bumble Bee doesn't want workers >> >with good taste; they want workers who taste good. > Cook them right, and they taste just like tuna. The KCQ method? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/2015 10:33 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> You were just waiting to use that when you made the OP. Shut up, dwarf. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/27/2015 10:38 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I don't > think your average 62 year-old Mexican worker would be tender enough, > and certainly not pullable at that stage. > > -sw Nice cannibalism, dwarf. Are you pretty well-marbled? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:38:29 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote: >On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 21:25:09 -0700, The Other Guy wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 00:19:49 -0400, Travis McGee > wrote: >> >>>I think the important point here is that Bumble Bee doesn't want workers >>>with good taste; they want workers who taste good. >> >> Cook them right, and they taste just like tuna. > >IIRC, a retort cooker gets up to about 265F at 15psi for less than an >hour, plus heating and cooling time - maybe 3 hours total. I don't >think your average 62 year-old Mexican worker would be tender enough, >and certainly not pullable at that stage. > >-sw Yeah, but... a Mexican would render to just a puddle of grease. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, April 27, 2015 at 5:35:34 PM UTC-10, Travis McGee wrote:
> Bumble Bee Foods, 2 others charged after employee died in pressure cooker > > An employee burned to death inside an industrial pressure cooker at the > Bumble Bee Foods plant in Santa Fe Springs in 2012. > By Matt Hamilton contact the reporter > > Bumble Bee Foods and two of the tuna company's employees were charged > Monday with willfully ignoring safety rules, leading to a plant worker > burning to death inside an industrial pressure cooker in 2012, > prosecutors said. > > The San Diego-based company, former safety manager Saul Florez, and > Angel Rodriguez, the director of plant operations, were each charged > with three felony counts of committing an occupational safety and health > violation that caused a death, according to the Los Angeles County > district attorney's office. > > On Oct. 11, 2012, Jose Melena, 62, entered a 35-foot oven at the > company's Santa Fe Springs plant to make a repair inside the machine, > which is used to sterilize thousands of cans of tuna at a time. > > Unaware that Melena was inside the oven, other plant workers loaded > several carts that altogether held about 12,000 pounds of tuna, shut the > door and turned on the oven, prosecutors said. > > Temperatures peaked at around 270 degrees, and Melena cooked to death, > prosecutors said. His charred remains were found by another plant worker. > > In a statement, the company said it disagrees with and is "disappointed > by the charges" filed by Los Angeles prosecutors. The company described > Melena's death as a "tragic accident" and noted that an investigation by > the California Division of Occupational Safety & Health "found no > willful violations related to the accident. > > Los Angeles County Dist. Atty. Jackie Lacey said in a statement that the > charges against Bumble Bee Foods are part of her goal of enhancing the > prosecution of workplace safety issues. > > "We take worker safety very seriously," Lacey said. "Although the Bumble > Bee investigation began in 2012, this case represents our commitment to > protecting workers from illegal -- and, potentially, deadly -- > on-the-job practices." > > Rodriguez, 63, remains employed by the company. It's unclear when > Florez, 42, stopped working for Bumble Bee. Rodriguez, Florez and the > company are scheduled to be arraigned May 27. > > If convicted, Rodriguez and Florez each face up to three years in prison > and a $250,000 fine. The company could be fined up to $1.5 million. Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I could have a lot of fun with something like that. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:35:29 -0400, Travis McGee wrote: > > Bumble Bee Foods and two of the tuna company¢s employees were charged > > Monday with willfully ignoring safety rules, leading to a plant worker > > burning to death inside an industrial pressure cooker in 2012, > > prosecutors said. > > That was almost 3 years ago that Mark posted that? > > What I don't understand is that the crispy worker had to realize they > were filling up the oven with racks of tuna to be processed. So it > was probably a good time to GTF out of there. That kind of killed my dinner idea for tonight. Soup and tuna sandwiches. I'll bet you they sold off those cans of tuna anyway. Won't be buying Bumble Bee brand for awhile. Instead.....soup and BT sandwiches on toast. I'm cooking the bacon right now. BLT - lettuce = BT |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I could have a lot of fun with something like that. A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. http://www.richardfisher.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: > > > > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I could have a lot of fun with something like that. > > A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. > > http://www.richardfisher.com Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. There's no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not going to be spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, right? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote: > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: > > > > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The > > working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, > > the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I could > > have a lot of fun with something like that. > > A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. > > http://www.richardfisher.com Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. There's no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not going to be spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, right? "If used properly" is the operative here. I once read on a toy inflatable shark "Not to be used as a life preserver." You know some idiot died doing just that. If you open a pressure cooker before it has discharged steam you will get a nasty burn. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. http://www.avast.com |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/28/2015 2:08 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "dsi1" > wrote in message > ... > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: >>> >>> Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The >>> working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, >>> the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I could >>> have a lot of fun with something like that. >> >> A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. >> >> http://www.richardfisher.com > > Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. There's > no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not going to be > spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you could rig > up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, right? > > "If used properly" is the operative here. I once read on a toy inflatable > shark "Not to be used as a life preserver." You know some idiot died doing > just that. If you open a pressure cooker before it has discharged steam you > will get a nasty burn. > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > http://www.avast.com > I can think of any number of way to produce injurious results from a pressure cooker. I can also think of ways for a car to fly though the air for short periods of time. What's that got to do with real life? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/28/2015 10:01 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> The processing plant needs all the support they can get. Dive in a meat grinder, troll. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote: >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: >> > >> > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The >> > working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, >> > the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I >> > could have a lot of fun with something like that. >> >> A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. >> >> http://www.richardfisher.com > > Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. > There's no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not going > to be spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you > could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, > right? If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem with mine. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" > wrote in message: > > Sure you > > could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, > > right? Yeah...like the Boston Marathon thing from a few years ago. > > If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem > with mine. I don't have one or need one but I always worried that "what if the pressure valve" failed. Don't say it won't...things happen. I worked at KFC during the summer of 1971. Back then we cooked chicken in 6 large pressure cookers full of oil/lard. Those things always scared the hell out of me. G. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Ophelia wrote: >> >> "dsi1" > wrote in message: > >> > Sure you >> > could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, >> > right? > > Yeah...like the Boston Marathon thing from a few years ago. > >> >> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem >> with mine. > > I don't have one or need one but I always worried that "what if the > pressure valve" failed. Don't say it won't...things happen. I worked > at KFC during the summer of 1971. Back then we cooked chicken in 6 > large pressure cookers full of oil/lard. Those things always scared > the hell out of me. Perhaps it might be worrying in the kind of industrial cookers you are describing, but if it happened in mine, it would just mean dinner sprayed over the ceiling I think. I have had pressure cookers for many, many years and my aunt before me who died over 30 years ago and neither of us had such a problem -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 11:35:04 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message > ... > > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote: > >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: > >> > > >> > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The > >> > working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. OTOH, > >> > the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I > >> > could have a lot of fun with something like that. > >> > >> A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. > >> > >> http://www.richardfisher.com > > > > Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. > > There's no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not going > > to be spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you > > could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, > > right? > > If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem > with mine. > > > -- > http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death of them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum cooker won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> > Perhaps it might be worrying in the kind of industrial cookers you are > describing, but if it happened in mine, it would just mean dinner sprayed > over the ceiling I think. Not necessarily. If you were nearby it could mean a serious scalding. > I have had pressure cookers for many, many years > and my aunt before me who died over 30 years ago and neither of us had such > a problem I don't know of a problem either but if that pressure valve failed and the cooker built up enough pressure to explode... arrggh@ The pressure valve is just a gadget and any "fail safe" thing like that COULD fail. Regardless, I've never needed one and I won't ever buy one. I don't need that extra worry in my life, even if it's not so valid. :-D |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 11:35:04 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >> "dsi1" wrote in message >> ... >> > On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 10:51:00 AM UTC-10, Helpful person wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, April 28, 2015 at 3:24:45 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote: >> >> > >> >> > Pressure cookers are safe, people just think they're dangerous. The >> >> > working pressure is less than half that of a passenger car tire. >> >> > OTOH, >> >> > the ones that you can walk into are a whole 'nother story. OTOH, I >> >> > could have a lot of fun with something like that. >> >> >> >> A car tire is not filled with scalding liquid. >> >> >> >> http://www.richardfisher.com >> > >> > Most times, people think that the vessel is in danger of exploding. >> > There's no chance of that happening and if used properly, it's not >> > going >> > to be spewing scalding liquid in your face or any part of you. Sure you >> > could rig up a pressure cooker to explode but that would pretty nuts, >> > right? >> >> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem >> with mine. >> >> >> -- >> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ > > I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death of > them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. > > They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum cooker > won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... >> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem >> with mine. > > I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death of > them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. > > They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum cooker > won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. This might work for you: http://www.coopersofstortford.co.uk/...-prodst09262i/ -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Regardless, I've never needed one and I won't ever buy one. I don't > need that extra worry in my life, even if it's not so valid. :-D Well, it has never been a worry to me and I really like mine ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/29/2015 9:09 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" > wrote in message > ... > >>> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any problem >>> with mine. >> >> I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death >> of them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. >> >> They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum >> cooker won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. > > This might work for you: > > http://www.coopersofstortford.co.uk/...-prodst09262i/ > > I might just get an induction ready pressure cooker. OTOH, I might be able to use an aluminum pressure cooker on top of a pan. I'm not too keen on that idea. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/29/2015 9:09 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "dsi1" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any >>>> problem >>>> with mine. >>> >>> I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death >>> of them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. >>> >>> They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum >>> cooker won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. >> >> This might work for you: >> >> http://www.coopersofstortford.co.uk/...-prodst09262i/ >> >> > > I might just get an induction ready pressure cooker. OTOH, I might be able > to use an aluminum pressure cooker on top of a pan. I'm not too keen on > that idea. I haven't heard of an induction ready pressure cooker! That hob converter will work with any other pans that are not induction friendly too. And no, it is not expensive ... ;-) -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/29/2015 9:10 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "Gary" > wrote in message > ... > >> Regardless, I've never needed one and I won't ever buy one. I don't >> need that extra worry in my life, even if it's not so valid. :-D > > Well, it has never been a worry to me and I really like mine ![]() > > A lot of folks consider a pressure cooker too dangerous to use. :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/29/2015 9:57 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > > "dsi1" > wrote in message > ... >> On 4/29/2015 9:09 AM, Ophelia wrote: >>> >>> >>> "dsi1" > wrote in message >>> ... >>> >>>>> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any >>>>> problem >>>>> with mine. >>>> >>>> I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death >>>> of them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. >>>> >>>> They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum >>>> cooker won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. >>> >>> This might work for you: >>> >>> http://www.coopersofstortford.co.uk/...-prodst09262i/ >>> >>> >>> >> >> I might just get an induction ready pressure cooker. OTOH, I might be >> able to use an aluminum pressure cooker on top of a pan. I'm not too >> keen on that idea. > > I haven't heard of an induction ready pressure cooker! That hob > converter will work with any other pans that are not induction friendly > too. They make steel pressure cookers - occasionally. OTOH, I could just get an electric pressure cooker. That would be cool or hot, rather! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4nOIRoe6mU > > And no, it is not expensive ... ;-) > Well let's just forget about that little glitch, shall we? Yes, I think we can. Hee hee. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/29/2015 9:10 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "Gary" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> Regardless, I've never needed one and I won't ever buy one. I don't >>> need that extra worry in my life, even if it's not so valid. :-D >> >> Well, it has never been a worry to me and I really like mine ![]() >> >> > > A lot of folks consider a pressure cooker too dangerous to use. :-) <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On 4/29/2015 9:57 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> >> >> "dsi1" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On 4/29/2015 9:09 AM, Ophelia wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> "dsi1" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>> >>>>>> If we are talking of home pressure cookers, I have never had any >>>>>> problem >>>>>> with mine. >>>>> >>>>> I've use those a lot. The first few times I did, I was scared to death >>>>> of them. Ha ha, that was pretty silly. >>>>> >>>>> They work like magic. I haven't used one in a while. My aluminum >>>>> cooker won't work with my induction cooktop. Too bad. >>>> >>>> This might work for you: >>>> >>>> http://www.coopersofstortford.co.uk/...-prodst09262i/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I might just get an induction ready pressure cooker. OTOH, I might be >>> able to use an aluminum pressure cooker on top of a pan. I'm not too >>> keen on that idea. >> >> I haven't heard of an induction ready pressure cooker! That hob >> converter will work with any other pans that are not induction friendly >> too. > > They make steel pressure cookers - occasionally. OTOH, I could just get an > electric pressure cooker. That would be cool or hot, rather! > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4nOIRoe6mU > >> >> And no, it is not expensive ... ;-) >> > > Well let's just forget about that little glitch, shall we? Yes, I think we > can. Hee hee. Okie dokie ;-) My lips shall be forever sealed! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can't take the lid off on most modern pressure cookers/canners if there's any pressure left inside, the lid is locked on.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-04-30, Janet > wrote:
> I'm betting you've never actually seen a pressure cooker close up, > let alone used one. I have. Seen my mom blow a couple bobble-weight cookers when I was a wee tyke. Later I ran a manual retort. That's canary speak for a pressure cooker big enought for a dozen ppl to stand up, in ....and be pressure cooked. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, April 29, 2015 at 11:00:00 AM UTC-10, wrote:
> You can't take the lid off on most modern pressure cookers/canners if there's any pressure left inside, the lid is locked on. You can't take the lid off because there's a mechanical interlock on the lid. OTOH, you probably wouldn't be able to take the lid off anyway because the pressure on the seals offer a lot of resistance to moving the lid. People that are afraid of pressure cookers haven't used one. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thursday, April 30, 2015 at 6:35:00 AM UTC-10, Janet wrote:
> In article >, lid > says... > > > > On 4/29/2015 9:10 AM, Ophelia wrote: > > > > > > > > > "Gary" > wrote in message > > > ... > > > > > >> Regardless, I've never needed one and I won't ever buy one. I don't > > >> need that extra worry in my life, even if it's not so valid. :-D > > > > > > Well, it has never been a worry to me and I really like mine ![]() > > > > > > > > > > A lot of folks consider a pressure cooker too dangerous to use. :-) > > Probably the same folks who employ someone to walk ahead of their car > waving a red flag, won't fly because they know planes are heavier than > air, won't have an injection in case all their blood runs out of the > hole. > > Janet UK The few. The brave. The pressure cookers. :-) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The lid locking thing was designed so the many retarded people that own a pressure cooker would be safe, oops, mentallly challenged people.
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pressure cookers | General Cooking | |||
Best Pressure cookers? | General Cooking | |||
Pressure Cookers. | General Cooking | |||
Pressure Cookers | Cooking Equipment | |||
Pressure cookers | General Cooking |