"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 6:48:03 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> You could not pay me to sit
>> >> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>> >
>> > That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>> > own husband.
>>
>> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
>> back
>> then.
>
> If I'm ever in the neighborhood, I'll give him a call. Of course, I'll
> almost certainly have my husband with me, because I like spending time
> with him.

Then you and I are the lucky ones ... We have much to be thankful for.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Sky wrote:
>
>OB Food: Freshly sliced nectarines and vanilla ice cream work so well
>together for dessert Suggested "improvements" welcomed! Please be
>forewarned, I'm not familiar with making tarts, tartins (sp?), and pie
>dough :/ And, it doesn't help that I cook for one (me) :/

Add fresh berries, a drizzle of honey, and garnish with a mint sprig
or a curl of citrus zest, or both.

Sky wrote:
>
>OB Food: what to do with nectarines, other than to eat them like an
>apple So convenient!

http://www.food.com/recipe/baked-apricots-france-376624

On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:15:59 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 5/22/2015 7:24 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >
> >
> > The whole rest of the world doesn't have to do what you did. And it
> > doesn't make us wrong because we didn't. I don't really remember too
> > many fond memories of sitting around the dinner table when I was a kid.
> > I do remember a lot of very uncomfortable times though.
>
> Life wasn't all 'Leave it to Beaver' but to me and to many others who
> post here (who actually enjoy cooking and *eating* food) we did sit with
> our family and eat. I'm not saying everyone had a wonderful happy
> childhood, but good lord... you make your life sound so miserable I
> don't know how you can stand it.
>
I know what you mean. My son's wife wasn't brought up in a household
where everyone sat around the dinner table every evening either, but
we did. She took to the concept like duck takes to water and now they
do too.


--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room.

On Sat, 23 May 2015 05:23:09 -0500, Sky >
wrote:

>On 5/22/2015 6:13 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> You could not pay me to sit
>>> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>>
>> That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>> own husband.
>
>Yes, it's truly sad - and most likely bove's 'husband' would rather sit
>elsewhere than with her at the dinner table --- he's learned better, I'd
>bet. After all, bove has posted many times how he stops/stopped for
>dinner on the way home from a restaurant/fast-food place rather then
>eating dinner at "his" home. Poor guy.

Stops to dine and celebrate with his lover.

On 2015-05-23 9:41 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

>> So? Why are people picking at me then? There is no rule or law or anything
>> that says that I have to sit down with anyone. And his schedule isn't the
>> same as ours anyway. 12 hour days with a long commute. He pretty much
>> comes home, eats and goes to bed.
>
> Dollars to donuts he's got a girlfriend... probably he's a bigamist
> with another wife and a whole nother family... that or just as likely
> he's the typical faggot leading a double life shacking with one or
> more males. It's patently obvious he only hangs with you to charge
> his battery.
>

When my brother was a teen he worked part time at the post office. One
of his co-workers had a steady job at General Motors, lived in a nice
house, drove a Cadillac. My brother asked him one day why he worked
part time when he had a good job and all the luxuries. The guy pulled
out a picture of his fat, ugly wife and said "If I am not working I have
to stay home with that."

On Sat, 23 May 2015 06:16:09 -0500, Sky >
wrote:

>On 5/21/2015 12:45 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>(big snip)
>>
>> I could do a lot of things. But do I want to? Nope. I did make
>> croissants as a child. Crescent rolls are probably not quite as much
>> work but... There are some things that are just easier to buy and that's
>> one of them.
>
>Bove implies she made croissants as a child with no supervision. In my
>very large world, a child is usually the age of 9 or younger. No matter
>what bove says, I have significant doubts that nearly anyone at the age
>of 9 can make and bake croissants from scratch without major help and
>supervision.

You'd be wrong... from the time I could walk I learned to bake, even
before I learned to cook... my grandmother baked... at nine I could
bake and decorate a tiered wedding cake with no help or supervision.
In my world young children became kitchen mavens.

On Sat, 23 May 2015 06:16:09 -0500, Sky >
wrote:

> On 5/21/2015 12:45 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> (big snip)
> >
> > I could do a lot of things. But do I want to? Nope. I did make
> > croissants as a child. Crescent rolls are probably not quite as much
> > work but... There are some things that are just easier to buy and that's
> > one of them.
>
> Bove implies she made croissants as a child with no supervision. In my
> very large world, a child is usually the age of 9 or younger. No matter
> what bove says, I have significant doubts that nearly anyone at the age
> of 9 can make and bake croissants from scratch without major help and
> supervision. Who was bove's mentor - certainly not her mother! Just
> another example and more compounding evidence of bove's exaggerated
> belief that she can 'cook' !!! from scratch no less, to make croissants
> --- har har! Would anyone like to purchase some ocean-front property
> located in Bolivia ?? :>
>
> OB Food: Canned crescent rolls can make convenient
>
I will gar-run-tee her croissants were crescent rolls in a tube. I
have no problem with a 9 year old baking them, other than her calling
them croissants.


--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room.

On 5/22/2015 11:38 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Cabrito del Bosque" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/22/2015 10:26 PM, Sky wrote:
>>> OB Food: what to do with nectarines,
>>
>>
>> **** off out of here Sqwerty!
>
> Is Sky him too?


Absolutely yes.

On 5/23/2015 12:28 AM, Sky wrote:
> How hilarious is this?!!! Bove at her very best
>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies
> to deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take
> their meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On 5/23/2015 1:56 AM, Sky wrote:
> My name is Sky, and I am a very, very picky eater . . !! 8-)
>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies
> to deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take
> their meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On 5/23/2015 4:23 AM, Sky wrote:
> Yes, it's truly sad - and most likely bove's 'husband'
>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies
> to deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take
> their meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On 5/23/2015 4:30 AM, Sky wrote:
> Bless her heart!! She suffers so much, poor thing
>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies
> to deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take
> their meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On 5/23/2015 5:16 AM, Sky wrote:
> OB Food: Canned crescent rolls
>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies
> to deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take
> their meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On 5/23/2015 2:04 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Cabrito del Bosque" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/22/2015 10:26 PM, Sky wrote:
>>>> OB Food: what to do with nectarines,
>>>
>>>
>>> **** off out of here Sqwerty!
>>
>> Is Sky him too?
>
> No! As I said, sky is in a league of her own.

Sure had me fooled!

Cabrito del Asswipe wrote:
>
> For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
> you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
> going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
> total blue.
<The old many times reposted sw post>

This will be my one and only response to you Cabrito del Butthole and
other names.

Get a life and **** off you worthless piece of human debree. Go stalk
those guys in other ngs. You do nothing here even though you think you
do. Each time I download all messages, I sort by sender and delete all
your names.

You do respond to others very nicely but please just lose the sw and
marty feud stuff. It's all worn out and old....aka "yawn"

On Sat, 23 May 2015 12:48:15 -0300, wrote:



>
>I still have rules too, no baseball caps, no television and now no
>phones. Haven't had a single grandchild or greatgrandchild protest.
>In my kids day I felt they liked it as part of their day they could
>talk about what they were doing, school etc. I could listen and tune
>into who they were mixing with and whether it required any action

Same here. The kids and grands actually like it and will tell their
friends if they join us for dinner. We get full compliance with no
complaints.

If they hear their phones dinging from a new message, they will just
say "it can wait" and not even look at the phone. It gives them a
break too.

On 5/23/2015 7:15 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 5/22/2015 7:24 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/22/2015 11:04 AM, MaryL wrote:
>>>> On 5/22/2015 4:09 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 20:17:18 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>> When I was growing up, the only time we all sat down together for a
>>>>>>> meal was
>>>>>>> up to perhaps when I was in the 6th grade. Beyond that, we all had
>>>>>>> so many
>>>>>>> activities that we were doing, that it was rare for us to sit down
>>>>>>> together.
>>>>>>> And that is really pretty typical of most people I know.
>>>>
>>>> How sad. Our family *always* sat together as a unit until I graduated
>>>> and left for college. We did the same thing when I was home on
>>>> vacations.
>>> (snippage)
>>>
>>> I agree, Mary. As long as my brothers and I were living with our
>>> parents as dependents we sat down and had dinner with them. The only
>>> exception being, as you said, was if we were perhaps spending the
>>> night at a friends' house. We also used to enjoy playing games
>>> together after dinner. Yahtzee was lots of fun.
>>>
>>> Even after we were young adults living on our own we were invited back
>>> for dinner a couple of times a month. I even had them over for dinner
>>> a few times before they moved to SC. Imagine that! Families sitting
>>> down doing things together.
>>
>> The whole rest of the world doesn't have to do what you did. And it
>> doesn't make us wrong because we didn't. I don't really remember too
>> many fond memories of sitting around the dinner table when I was a kid.
>> I do remember a lot of very uncomfortable times though.
>
> Life wasn't all 'Leave it to Beaver' but to me and to many others who
> post here (who actually enjoy cooking and *eating* food) we did sit with
> our family and eat. I'm not saying everyone had a wonderful happy
> childhood, but good lord... you make your life sound so miserable I
> don't know how you can stand it.
>
> Jill


But you do know how to and love to enhance her misery, you mealy mouthed
shrew.

On 5/23/2015 7:28 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> My father paid cash for this house. He also never had a car payment.
> Bet you have a car note of three, too. Gee, I don't. I bought my car
> in 2003 and paid it off within a month.


You overcompensate for the largess of your free home so wildly.

Lose the guilt complex.

On 5/23/2015 7:34 AM, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> Is that what bothers you? Got news for you, inherited houses are not
>> free. Even if I didn't live in a gated community with HOA fees and
>> goofy rules I'd still have to pay the same monthly bills as anyone else.
>> Electricity, water, phone, cable, property taxes, the guy who mows the
>> lawn. I still have to call a repair person from time to time. Nothing
>> about inheriting a house is free. It's funny how some people think it
>> means that.
>
> The house was free. Win a new car on a game show? Great prize but you
> still have to buy insurance, taxes etc.
>
> If you still can't see the "free" part, sell it and take the money and
> run. What ever amount you run away with is the nice sum of the free
> part.
>
LOL!

On 5/23/2015 7:41 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> he's the typical faggot leading a double life shacking with one or
> more males.

You may well be the most bigoted person in this group, hands down.

On Sat, 23 May 2015 12:21:39 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

> If they hear their phones dinging from a new message, they will just
> say "it can wait" and not even look at the phone. It gives them a
> break too.

My grandson isn't glued to his phone. In fact, he rarely turns it on.
I text him - no answer. He takes public transportation to my house
and either "accidentally" leaves his phone at home or he forgets to
charge it, so there's no contacting him in transit. It's both
concerning and annoying.

--
A kitchen without a cook is just a room.

On 5/23/2015 9:11 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-05-23 9:41 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>>> So? Why are people picking at me then? There is no rule or law or
>>> anything
>>> that says that I have to sit down with anyone. And his schedule
>>> isn't the
>>> same as ours anyway. 12 hour days with a long commute. He pretty much
>>> comes home, eats and goes to bed.
>>
>> Dollars to donuts he's got a girlfriend... probably he's a bigamist
>> with another wife and a whole nother family... that or just as likely
>> he's the typical faggot leading a double life shacking with one or
>> more males. It's patently obvious he only hangs with you to charge
>> his battery.
>>
>
> When my brother was a teen he worked part time at the post office. One
> of his co-workers had a steady job at General Motors, lived in a nice
> house, drove a Cadillac. My brother asked him one day why he worked
> part time when he had a good job and all the luxuries. The guy pulled
> out a picture of his fat, ugly wife and said "If I am not working I have
> to stay home with that."
>

Just wow.

Your choice of stories to share says SO much about you...

On 5/23/2015 9:52 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:11:44 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> When my brother was a teen he worked part time at the post office. One
>> of his co-workers had a steady job at General Motors, lived in a nice
>> house, drove a Cadillac. My brother asked him one day why he worked
>> part time when he had a good job and all the luxuries. The guy pulled
>> out a picture of his fat, ugly wife and said "If I am not working I have
>> to stay home with that."
>
>
> Of course history doesn't tell us if his fat, ugly wife was just as
> grateful HE and his ego weren`t around all the time.
>
+1

On 5/23/2015 10:15 AM, Gary wrote:
> Cabrito del Asswipe wrote:
>>
>> For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
>> you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
>> going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
>> total blue.
> <The old many times reposted sw post>
>
> This will be my one and only response to you Cabrito del Butthole and
> other names.

Ooooh...an ultimatum!

<pricking my ears up>

> Get a life and **** off you worthless piece of human debree.

I believe it's spelled "debris", ekshually...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ija8r4yqM2U

"There's more trouble at the depot with the general workers union.."

> Go stalk those guys in other ngs.

The point is, and I've made it before, they've largely killed those
groups off.

> You do nothing here even though you think you do.

Oh I do plenty, there's a plutonium grade seethe going on in Spin and Marty.

I like that.

> Each time I download all messages, I sort by sender and delete all
> your names.

That's nice, of course in doing so you miss the topical material, but
it's your call to make.

> You do respond to others very nicely but please just lose the sw and
> marty feud stuff. It's all worn out and old....aka "yawn"

It's as "worn out" as the groups THEY have killed off and then laughed
about.

Seriously, what kind of misanthropes soil the very nests they play in?

These are bad people, and letting them use this group as usenet Pakistan
isn't healthy for the host nor the regulars.

To stretch the analogy, would you really let the Taliban seed in your
hometown because it's easier not to fight back?

On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 2:12:25 PM UTC-4, Cabrito del Bosque wrote:

>
> Let's have your best shot, dimwit.
>
> This should be god for a rich old belly laugh!

Ah yes, the butthurt, you have it.

See, I'm just here for the lulz.
You though, you're obsessed with certain
individuals, and have an obvious compulsion to
respond to each and every post. So when you
call other people out for mental problems, or
anything else, well thanks for the lulz.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com...b15d4d4262.jpg

How's your old belly? This should help, since I
know you're a big fan:

http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...0/185/Umad.png

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 6:48:03 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> You could not pay me to sit
>> >> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>> >
>> > That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>> > own husband.
>>
>> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
>> back
>> then.
>
> If I'm ever in the neighborhood, I'll give him a call. Of course, I'll
> almost certainly have my husband with me, because I like spending time
> with him.

Okay...

On 5/23/2015 1:33 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Friday, May 22, 2015 at 6:48:03 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> >> You could not pay me to sit
>>> >> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>>> >
>>> > That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>>> > own husband.
>>>
>>> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
>>> back
>>> then.
>>
>> If I'm ever in the neighborhood, I'll give him a call. Of course, I'll
>> almost certainly have my husband with me, because I like spending time
>> with him.
>
> Okay...


This is the kind of thing that can best be discussed over that tasty
White Castle Casserole.

Had a leftover slice for breakfast today, yummy.

On Saturday, May 23, 2015 at 12:15:05 PM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
> Cabrito del Asswipe wrote:
> >
> > For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
> > you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
> > going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
> > total blue.
> <The old many times reposted sw post>
>
> This will be my one and only response to you Cabrito del Butthole and
> other names.
>
> Get a life and **** off you worthless piece of human debree. Go stalk
> those guys in other ngs. You do nothing here even though you think you
> do. Each time I download all messages, I sort by sender and delete all
> your names.
>
> You do respond to others very nicely but please just lose the sw and
> marty feud stuff. It's all worn out and old....aka "yawn"

Agree 100%. Boner House is not even much of an irritant anymore. Just something to be deleted unread.

On 5/23/2015 2:04 PM, wrote:
> On Saturday, May 23, 2015 at 12:15:05 PM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
>> Cabrito del Asswipe wrote:
>>>
>>> For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
>>> you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
>>> going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
>>> total blue.
>> <The old many times reposted sw post>
>>
>> This will be my one and only response to you Cabrito del Butthole and
>> other names.
>>
>> Get a life and **** off you worthless piece of human debree. Go stalk
>> those guys in other ngs. You do nothing here even though you think you
>> do. Each time I download all messages, I sort by sender and delete all
>> your names.
>>
>> You do respond to others very nicely but please just lose the sw and
>> marty feud stuff. It's all worn out and old....aka "yawn"
>
> Agree 100%. Boner House is not even much of an irritant anymore. Just something to be deleted unread.
>
Oh lookie, one of the original dead end kids took your bait, lol.

On 5/23/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2015 08:06:21 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:15:59 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 5/22/2015 7:24 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The whole rest of the world doesn't have to do what you did. And it
>>>> doesn't make us wrong because we didn't. I don't really remember too
>>>> many fond memories of sitting around the dinner table when I was a kid.
>>>> I do remember a lot of very uncomfortable times though.
>>>
>>> Life wasn't all 'Leave it to Beaver' but to me and to many others who
>>> post here (who actually enjoy cooking and *eating* food) we did sit with
>>> our family and eat. I'm not saying everyone had a wonderful happy
>>> childhood, but good lord... you make your life sound so miserable I
>>> don't know how you can stand it.
>>>
>> I know what you mean. My son's wife wasn't brought up in a household
>> where everyone sat around the dinner table every evening either, but
>> we did. She took to the concept like duck takes to water and now they
>> do too.
>
> I still have rules too, no baseball caps, no television and now no
> phones. Haven't had a single grandchild or greatgrandchild protest.
> In my kids day I felt they liked it as part of their day they could
> talk about what they were doing, school etc. I could listen and tune
> into who they were mixing with and whether it required any action
>
We didn't watch television (there wasn't a TV in the kitchen) and back
then no one had cell phones. My parents knew my friends and knew how to
reach their parents - and by extension - me, if I was at one of their
homes, be it for dinner or a sleepover. We talked about our days and
after dinner often played card games or Yahtzee. IOW, we acted like a
family.

Jill

On 5/23/2015 11:52 AM, wrote:
> On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:11:44 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>>
>>
>> When my brother was a teen he worked part time at the post office. One
>> of his co-workers had a steady job at General Motors, lived in a nice
>> house, drove a Cadillac. My brother asked him one day why he worked
>> part time when he had a good job and all the luxuries. The guy pulled
>> out a picture of his fat, ugly wife and said "If I am not working I have
>> to stay home with that."
>
>
> Of course history doesn't tell us if his fat, ugly wife was just as
> grateful HE and his ego weren`t around all the time.
>
He also doesn't tell us whether or not his brother turned out to be fat
and ugly. LOL

Jill

On 5/22/2015 6:47 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>> You could not pay me to sit
>>> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>>
>> That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>> own husband.
>
> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
> back then.

This brings to mind a woman I worked with when I lived in TN. She was a
programmer and also one hell of a good cook. I also knew her father.
He told me the only reason she got married was so she'd have a sperm
donor (his words, not mine). She wanted to have kids so she married a
guy just so she could have a couple. Her husband died but she certainly
wasn't the grieving widow. I'm seeing a certain correlation...

Jill

In article >, says...
>
> "Janet" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article >, says...
> >
> >
> >> No... But people bitch if I mention a specific family member here so I
> >> didn't do it. Someone in this house is going to get canned food for
> >> dinner
> >> once I have used up what fresh food I have. Reason being, they did not
> >> come
> >> home for dinner or let me know that they were not coming home, one too
> >> freaking many times. I thought that crap had ended but it started up
> >> again
> >> when this person's out of town friend was in town for two weeks.
> >
> > and we all know you're talking about your husband, who treats you like
> > dirt while seeing someone else.
> >
> > Janet UK
>
> OMG! Janet! You are having an affair with my husband? Sheesh. He must
> have stooped to a new low. Bwahahaha!

No, your husband is seeing someone else instead of coming home for
dinner with you. YOU just posted that above.


Janet

On 5/23/2015 3:57 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 5/22/2015 6:47 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Thursday, May 21, 2015 at 11:17:28 PM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> You could not pay me to sit
>>>> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>>>
>>> That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>>> own husband.
>>
>> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
>> back then.
>
> This brings to mind a woman I worked with when I lived in TN. She was a
> programmer and also one hell of a good cook. I also knew her father. He
> told me the only reason she got married was so she'd have a sperm donor
> (his words, not mine). She wanted to have kids so she married a guy
> just so she could have a couple. Her husband died but she certainly
> wasn't the grieving widow. I'm seeing a certain correlation...
>
> Jill


Wow, you just can't let her alone, can you shrew?

On 2015-05-23 17:47, jmcquown wrote:
> On 5/23/2015 11:52 AM, wrote:
>> On Sat, 23 May 2015 11:11:44 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:

>> Of course history doesn't tell us if his fat, ugly wife was just as
>> grateful HE and his ego weren`t around all the time.
>>
> He also doesn't tell us whether or not his brother turned out to be fat
> and ugly. LOL
>

Actually, no, he didn't.

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/22/2015 10:16 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/22/2015 6:49 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 5/22/2015 9:49 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-05-22 12:09 AM, wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 21 May 2015 20:30:09 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm sure that is well and truly self-evident to anybody here who
>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>> read enough of your posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So? Some people enjoy such things. I don't.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What DO you enjoy? Seriously?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The attention.
>>>>>
>>>>> She obviously doesn't get the attention at home.
>>>>>
>>>>> It's interesting how many people think I'm a lonely old shrew because
>>>>> I don't have a husband. If I had a husband such as Julie describes
>>>>> I'd have walked out long ago. Oh wait, I did! I don't put up with
>>>>> that kind of crap.
>>>>
>>>> But you inherited a house. I got nothing.
>>>
>>> Is that what bothers you? Got news for you, inherited houses are not
>>> free. Even if I didn't live in a gated community with HOA fees and
>>> goofy rules I'd still have to pay the same monthly bills as anyone
>>> else. Electricity, water, phone, cable, property taxes, the guy who
>>> mows the lawn. I still have to call a repair person from time to
>>> time. Nothing about inheriting a house is free. It's funny how some
>>> people think it means that.
>>
>> Why would that bother me?
>
> You're the one who said "But you inherited a house. I got nothing."
> Sounds like sour grapes to me.
>
> I remind you again, sorry, but nothing in life is FREE.
>
>> I don't care what you or anyone else does.
>> Yeah, you're paying all of the things that everyone else on the face of
>> this earth pays. But not a house payment.
>
> I chose NOT to have a house payment. I didn't mind renting. I loved my
> last apartment. Unlike some people here I did not have or worry about
> yearly rent increases. I don't think they'd raised the rent in three or
> four years.
>
> My father paid cash for this house. He also never had a car payment. Bet
> you have a car note of three, too. Gee, I don't. I bought my car in 2003
> and paid it off within a month.

A car note of three? What does that mean? We have three cars. Angela
purchased one with cash. I think my husband's is paid off. I don't really
know. He is making payments on mine for the time being. He is still owed a
very large chunk of change from the VA. In my entire lifetime I have had 4
cars and two vans. I financed two of the cars but they were paid off
quickly. Three cars were used. I traded one car in for a van and the
remainder was financed but it was paid off in a matter of months. The van
that I got when we moved here was an emergency purchase, paid for in cash.
Why do you have a problem with making payments for things? Doesn't make a
person any worse or better because they are making payments.

And please don't tell me that nothing in life is free. Plenty is. You just
don't know where to look for it.
>
>> I am getting disability.
>
> Uh huh.
>
>> can't work. I have limited income and that wouldn't be enough for me to
>> rent or buy anything on my own. Get it? If not, oh well. Stick a fork
>> in it. I'm done.
>
> Yeah... until the next sob story. Meanwhile, I'll be grilling some corn
> on the cob. Sorry, I don't feel like grilling more salmon just yet.

What sob story? I am just sick of you acting like you think you are better
than me. You sure are not!

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Julie Bove wrote:
>>
>> "Cindy Hamilton" wrote:
>
>> > Julie Bove wrote:
>> >> You could not pay me to sit
>> >> down with the person who is getting the food that I mentioned.
>> >
>> > That's really sad--that you wouldn't sit down with your
>> > own husband.
>>
>> How about you sit down with him then? Bet you'll take it all
>> back
>> then.
>
> LMAO! Good response, Julie! hahaha
> That was my first good laugh in days~ :-D

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> Is that what bothers you? Got news for you, inherited houses are not
>> free. Even if I didn't live in a gated community with HOA fees and
>> goofy rules I'd still have to pay the same monthly bills as anyone else.
>> Electricity, water, phone, cable, property taxes, the guy who mows the
>> lawn. I still have to call a repair person from time to time. Nothing
>> about inheriting a house is free. It's funny how some people think it
>> means that.
>
> The house was free. Win a new car on a game show? Great prize but you
> still have to buy insurance, taxes etc.
>
> If you still can't see the "free" part, sell it and take the money and
> run. What ever amount you run away with is the nice sum of the free
> part.

Yes. I get all sorts of free magazines. Not all are of interest to me but
that wasn't a problem in the past. I was passing them on to someone I know.
I specifically got many of those for her husband because he is stuck at
home. However, the situation has changed and I am no longer in contact with
this woman. I could be but it would mean my driving specifically to give
this to her. So... I will not renew subscriptions to those. I never paid
a dime for any of the magazines. I have also gotten a pedometer (could have
gotten another), two USB drives, and am awaiting my spiralizer.

I have gotten free cat food, free human food, toilet paper, paper towels.
Yes, getting these things does take a minute or two of my time because they
need my address.

We also got tons of free stuff when we got this house. Husband got a call
from the real estate agent asking if we would like the patio set? He told
her we would take it and anything else they wanted to leave. I'll bet he
never says that again! Turns out that the patio set was broken to the point
of not being able to take it apart which I am sure is why they left it. We
were able to use it for many years. At first it wasn't broken as in falling
apart but broken as in stuck together and can't take apart. But then it did
break as in falling apart. Some of it is still out there. The rest was
hauled away to the dump.

There is also is a free lunch! I had one where my mom lives. Anyone can.
Just stop by and say that you are interested in moving in, or moving in a
loved one. They'll feed you whatever you want.

On 5/23/2015 9:34 AM, Gary wrote:
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> Is that what bothers you? Got news for you, inherited houses are not
>> free. Even if I didn't live in a gated community with HOA fees and
>> goofy rules I'd still have to pay the same monthly bills as anyone else.
>> Electricity, water, phone, cable, property taxes, the guy who mows the
>> lawn. I still have to call a repair person from time to time. Nothing
>> about inheriting a house is free. It's funny how some people think it
>> means that.
>
> The house was free. Win a new car on a game show? Great prize but you
> still have to buy insurance, taxes etc.
>
Uh, yeah, that's what makes it not "free".

> If you still can't see the "free" part, sell it and take the money and
> run. What ever amount you run away with is the nice sum of the free
> part.
>
A nice sum? Not when the housing market in a given area is depressed.
My car is paid for, too. Paid for does not equal free by a long shot.

Jill