"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/24/2015 4:03 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>>
>> Mosty of the nuts are sold to China. Most of the nut farms are owned by
>> Wall Street investment companies. So Wall Street is exacerbating the
>> problem by planing thousand sof new acres with nut trees to increase
>> their
>> profits.
>>
>
> That is true, but the almond growers also employ people, the employees buy
> groceries and pay taxes. Others maintain equipment.

Almond growing is a very low labor business. It is mostly mechanized. One
does not pick almonds, they are shaken from the tree using a special
machine.

> Sounds like you need balance.

Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short term
profits.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:


>> Sounds like you need balance.
>
> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short term
> profits.
>

I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
stuff.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>
>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>
>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>> term
>> profits.
>>
>
> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
> stuff.

You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
smells a little of money.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>
>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>>> term
>>> profits.
>>>
>>
>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
>> stuff.
>
> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
> smells a little of money.
>

You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with
or without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>>>> term
>>>> profits.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
>>> stuff.
>>
>> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
>> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
>> smells a little of money.
>>
>
> You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with or
> without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.

Not the point I was making.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 5/25/2015 12:52 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>>>>> term
>>>>> profits.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
>>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
>>> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
>>> smells a little of money.
>>>
>>
>> You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with or
>> without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.
>
> Not the point I was making.
>
>

But the answer is important in deciding the fate of water distribution
and almond growers. And to determine if you are being sold down the
river or made better.

Is there a yes or no?

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 5/25/2015 12:52 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for
>>>>>> short
>>>>>> term
>>>>>> profits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow.
>>>>> Good
>>>>> stuff.
>>>>
>>>> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
>>>> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that
>>>> even
>>>> smells a little of money.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with
>>> or
>>> without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.
>>
>> Not the point I was making.
>>
>>
>
> But the answer is important in deciding the fate of water distribution and
> almond growers. And to determine if you are being sold down the river or
> made better.
>
> Is there a yes or no?

Wall Street has been buying up orchards and massively over planting new
trees during a drought so as to satisfy Chinese demand and reap higher
rewards for investors. That makes the problem much worse if you are on trhe
side of we need to conserve water if we are going to get through this..

So are we better off? Depends on who you are I suppose.

>



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com

On 5/24/2015 10:52 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>>>>> term
>>>>> profits.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
>>>> stuff.
>>>
>>> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
>>> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
>>> smells a little of money.
>>>
>>
>> You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with or
>> without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.
>
> Not the point I was making.

You don't have a "point" pinko - you're a damnable worthless
anti-capitalist scumbag!

**** off and DIE!

On 5/24/2015 10:39 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 5/25/2015 12:24 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 5/24/2015 11:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Sounds like you need balance.
>>>>
>>>> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short
>>>> term
>>>> profits.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm going to pick up a half gallon jar of almond butter tomorrow. Good
>>> stuff.
>>
>> You would. But I was referring to Wall Street greed. There is no such
>> thing as balance when they stick their proboscis into anything that even
>> smells a little of money.
>>
>
> You still have to go back to the roots. Is California better off with
> or without almonds? Forget Wall Street, the answer is either yes or no.
>

**** the marxist ****, he's a damned commie.

On 5/24/2015 10:24 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> But I was referring to Wall Street greed.


A Marxist asshat like you would of course.

Wassamatta, life made you a failure?

You ASSHOLE!

On 5/24/2015 9:27 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On 5/24/2015 4:03 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Mosty of the nuts are sold to China. Most of the nut farms are owned by
>>> Wall Street investment companies. So Wall Street is exacerbating the
>>> problem by planing thousand sof new acres with nut trees to increase
>>> their
>>> profits.
>>>
>>
>> That is true, but the almond growers also employ people, the employees buy
>> groceries and pay taxes. Others maintain equipment.
>
> Almond growing is a very low labor business. It is mostly mechanized. One
> does not pick almonds, they are shaken from the tree using a special
> machine.

So are pecans, guess who runs and pays for those machines.

You anti-business ASSHOLE!

>> Sounds like you need balance.
>
> Sounds like we need to stop selling ourselves down the river for short term
> profits.

Sounds like you;re some risible Marxist ****wit.

I'd LOVE to get you in an MMA ring, cupcake, you game?