Edward Morbius wrote:
> http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/classic_gums
>
> Teaberry is a regional name for wintergreen (also known as Canada tea,
> which may explain the name of Canada mints which are also wintergreen
> flavored).

http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/...ticle-1.630278
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYV_QvYr0ao

On 7/22/2015 7:17 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Edward Morbius wrote:
>> http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/classic_gums
>>
>> Teaberry is a regional name for wintergreen (also known as Canada tea,
>> which may explain the name of Canada mints which are also wintergreen
>> flavored).
>
> http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/...ticle-1.630278
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYV_QvYr0ao
>


Wow, a blatant Wrigley packaging ripoff!

On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:05:44 -0600, "Dr. Edward Morbius"
> wrote:

>On 7/22/2015 7:17 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Edward Morbius wrote:
>>> http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/classic_gums
>>>
>>> Teaberry is a regional name for wintergreen (also known as Canada tea,
>>> which may explain the name of Canada mints which are also wintergreen
>>> flavored).
>>
>> http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/...ticle-1.630278
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYV_QvYr0ao
>>
>
>
>Wow, a blatant Wrigley packaging ripoff!


Arrow versus banner. I wonder how it would play out in court
http://www.wrigley.com/global/brands/spearmint.aspx

Different, but there seems to be an influence.

On 7/22/2015 12:06 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:05:44 -0600, "Dr. Edward Morbius"
> > wrote:
>
>> On 7/22/2015 7:17 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Edward Morbius wrote:
>>>> http://www.candyblog.net/blog/item/classic_gums
>>>>
>>>> Teaberry is a regional name for wintergreen (also known as Canada tea,
>>>> which may explain the name of Canada mints which are also wintergreen
>>>> flavored).
>>>
>>> http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/...ticle-1.630278
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYV_QvYr0ao
>>>
>>
>>
>> Wow, a blatant Wrigley packaging ripoff!
>
>
> Arrow versus banner. I wonder how it would play out in court
> http://www.wrigley.com/global/brands/spearmint.aspx
>
> Different, but there seems to be an influence.
>


I guess their sales were never so much of a threat that it got that far.

Still, solid point. It's darned close.