On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:51:17 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
> wrote:

>Dave Smith > wrote:
>> On 2015-07-31 12:05 PM, jinx the minx wrote:
>>
>>> Great advice (not that she wants it!). Almost all large chain stores have
>>> "contact us" email links on their websites as well. It's always worked for
>>> me, since I know the request will be funneled to those that can actually do
>>> something about it and not to the "dead air" on the floor.
>>>
>> You have to cut Julie some slack. She has special problems in the stores
>> she deals with. There was the store where the birds were always getting
>> into the bread on the lower shelves, the problem with buying moldy. One
>> of the more serious hazards was the woman with the mop who was staking
>> her. It is a very special world that she lives in.
>
>Lest you be accused of lying, the broom chaser was man in a turban. I
>think the woman was the handicap scooter attacker.

Can't help but laugh when this stuff comes up again. Cat-abducting
raccoons, pet psychics, vicious handicapped scooter attackers, mad
Hindu broom chasers...

If there's ever a biography on Julie - I'll be the first customer

On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:25:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Gary" > wrote in message ...
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>
>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>> > We do eat fresh pears. I asked a very specific thing. You don't have
>>> > the
>>> > answer, so shut up. You'll never be a Princess.
>>>
>>> What's desirable about being a Princess?
>>
>> Unless you are born into royalty in some country that applies, the
>> term "Princess" in the USA only means (to me) a very spoiled little
>> girl who has always gotten her way.
>
>That would be me!

My first impression of you was the right one.

On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:40:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:


>I always get what I want. It might take awhile but I don't settle for less.

That would account for:

Your house, and it's manifold problems
Your town
Your neighbours
The raccoons
Your philandering husband
Your spoilt/selfish daughter
Having to use 17 fans
'Swap' coolers
'good health'
Mold in food
etc.
etc.
etc.

On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:50:17 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2015-08-01 7:48 AM, Bruce wrote:
>
>>>
>>> I don't know which sock is which any more.
>>
>> Me neither. They're all pollution.
>>
>They aren't even worth filtering because they change daily. That is an
>admission to themselves that they are total assholes.

every time a new one shows up I just go to filters and tell it to
delete all postings from the new one.
I never see any of it.
Janet US

On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 09:55:44 -0600, Directorate of Troll Removal and
Disposal > wrote:

> On 7/31/2015 10:43 PM, sf wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 20:44:47 -0600, Directorate of Troll Removal and
> > Disposal > wrote:
> >
> >> You need to have a really life changing experience of the NEGATIVE kind
> >> - and very soon, you sick bitch.
> >
> > FYI - she's had one, very sad.
> >
> Oh has she, well, it can't have been life-changing enough by a long
> shot....

I think it was.

--

sf

"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 15:50:17 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>On 2015-08-01 7:48 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know which sock is which any more.
>>>
>>> Me neither. They're all pollution.
>>>
>>They aren't even worth filtering because they change daily. That is an
>>admission to themselves that they are total assholes.
>
> every time a new one shows up I just go to filters and tell it to
> delete all postings from the new one.
> I never see any of it.

The nicks change so often I have lost track of who is who.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:26:36 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:
>every time a new one shows up I just go to filters and tell it to
>delete all postings from the new one.
>I never see any of it.

Yep. I only see the occasional reply (why do they reply???).
It's not hard to filter the new names as they appear, do that, and the
group looks much like it should.

On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 10:06:23 -0600, Directorate of Troll Removal and
Disposal > wrote:

> On 8/1/2015 4:49 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 11:21:35 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >> I don't know which sock is which any more.
> >
> > You mean you can't tell the socks from the frogs? That's their
> > intention.
> >
>
> Yes it is.
>
> And the massive effort the 'gang of four' is demonstrating now speaks to
> just how uncomfortable _I_ have made it for them around here.
>
> (pats self on back)
>
> Regrets?
>
> Moi?
>
> ZERO.

They are certainly having an internet temper tantrum. I still haven't
decided if it's nature (mental midgets) or nurture (as in none).
Whatever it is, they don't act their age.

--

sf

On 2015-08-01 20:18, wrote:

>> every time a new one shows up I just go to filters and tell it to
>> delete all postings from the new one.
>> I never see any of it.
>> Janet US
>
> I do the same and never, in all my years on usenet, has my kf been so
> overworked!
> \\


Why bother? They immature twits are easy enough to spot and ignore. You
can stick them in you KF but they have probably already started with a
new name before you get the old one into the filter.

On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 21:06:50 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2015-08-01 20:18, wrote:
>
>>> every time a new one shows up I just go to filters and tell it to
>>> delete all postings from the new one.
>>> I never see any of it.
>>> Janet US
>>
>> I do the same and never, in all my years on usenet, has my kf been so
>> overworked!
>> \\
>
>
>Why bother? They immature twits are easy enough to spot and ignore. You
>can stick them in you KF but they have probably already started with a
>new name before you get the old one into the filter.

The nyms change maybe once a week. Is it not worth spending a second
to click and filter once a week?

On 7/31/2015 11:59 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> <snork>
>
> -sw


ESAD

On 8/1/2015 4:50 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 10:06:23 -0600, Directorate of Troll Removal and
> Disposal > wrote:
>
>> On 8/1/2015 4:49 AM, sf wrote:
>>> On Sat, 1 Aug 2015 11:21:35 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't know which sock is which any more.
>>>
>>> You mean you can't tell the socks from the frogs? That's their
>>> intention.
>>>
>>
>> Yes it is.
>>
>> And the massive effort the 'gang of four' is demonstrating now speaks to
>> just how uncomfortable _I_ have made it for them around here.
>>
>> (pats self on back)
>>
>> Regrets?
>>
>> Moi?
>>
>> ZERO.
>
> They are certainly having an internet temper tantrum. I still haven't
> decided if it's nature (mental midgets) or nurture (as in none).
> Whatever it is, they don't act their age.
>

It's a classic for sure, usenet's oldest 4 year olds.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being attacked
>> in a
>> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
>
> I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
> chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
> hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
> you're on your own.
>
> And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
> attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
> with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
> (assuming she is fine with it).
>
> G. :-D

Goes okay with me? What part of being attacked would be okay?

"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 21:57:02 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:03:41 -0600, Janet B >
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:20:52 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:57:46 -0600, Janet B >
>>> >wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:02:59 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
>>> >> > wrote:
>>> >> >
>>> >> >> Janet B > wrote:
>>> >> >> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:35:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
>>> >> >> > > wrote:
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> >> >> >> ...
>>> >> >> >>> On 7/30/2015 11:33 PM, jinx the minx wrote:
>>> >> >> >>>> You should be asking YOUR STORE what THEIR issue is
>>> >> >> >>>> getting/keeping them
>>> >> >> >>>> in
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > snip
>>> >> >> > I don't go there often because
>>> >> >> >> of the high prices, or Winco because of the distance. Target
>>> >> >> >> doesn't sell
>>> >> >> >> the little cans and neither do the organic type stores.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Write down exactly what you want on a piece of paper. Do you
>>> >> >> > remember
>>> >> >> > the brand? Take the piece of paper to the customer service desk
>>> >> >> > at
>>> >> >> > Winco. Request that they stock the item for you,. I usually
>>> >> >> > get what
>>> >> >> > I want in 2 days, only once did it take longer. The person
>>> >> >> > behind the
>>> >> >> > desk will pass your note to the person who does the ordering
>>> >> >> > for the
>>> >> >> > canned fruit section. I have never had them refuse a request
>>> >> >> > from me.
>>> >> >> > Don't ask a clerk at the checkout or in the aisle. They have
>>> >> >> > nothing
>>> >> >> > to do with stock maintenance.
>>> >> >> > Janet US
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Great advice (not that she wants it!). Almost all large chain
>>> >> >> stores have
>>> >> >> "contact us" email links on their websites as well. It's always
>>> >> >> worked for
>>> >> >> me, since I know the request will be funneled to those that can
>>> >> >> actually do
>>> >> >> something about it and not to the "dead air" on the floor.
>>> >> >
>>> >> >But first, it needs to be in their warehouse to order.
>>> >>
>>> >> Well, then, why should we even bother to ask? It's maybe not
>>> >> available to them and she couldn't get it anyway. Let's ask someone
>>> >> in Hoboken if the cans are available there -- that makes more sense.
>>> >> Janet US
>>> >
>>> >Don't ask me to explain her thought process. I know from personal
>>> >experience that if it's not in the distribution center, they can't
>>> >order it. Period. Sure we can submit a request, but it will be an
>>> >exercise in frustration. I posted a link for pears in 8.5 oz cans.
>>>
>>> as I said, I've always had my requests filled. I understand about the
>>> warehouse. How much effort is it to drop a note off at the customer
>>> service desk? Surely that should be the first thing you do.
>>
>>I go to the customer service desk and they tell me they stock every
>>item found in the warehouse (it's a big store). I've gone to the
>>trouble of filling out a request form but who knows if it ever shows
>>up.
>
> I'm speaking specifically of Winco. Julie shops there as do I. I
> know for a 'fact' that Winco is not selling a store nor building a
> store in her area. So no disruption problems with her Winco store. I
> am speaking of the results that I have had with Winco customer service
> and their warehouses. They are employee owned and very focused on
> service. Besides, stores are beginning to stock up for
> 'Back-to-School'. I would think a request for small cans of pears
> would be met with interest.
> There is little point in sitting on your hands and asking an
> international food group regarding availability. I've always felt
> embarrassed when I haven't checked out the most obvious solution
> first. Apparently that is not the way she operates. It is easier to
> shift responsibility elsewhere. At this point she has no idea whether
> her local store has access or not and is not willing to find out. I'd
> say the original post was bogus.
> Logically, consumers must be prepared for price increases and
> shortages because drought conditions are reducing crop outputs. But
> we/she will not know if it affects the canned pears and the canned
> pears price unless she asks someone who can give her an informed
> answer.
> Janet US

I never said they were selling a Winco. In fact, they are putting a new one
in, in Lynnwood where the Top Foods used to be. The problem with Winco is
that I don't live near it. It's not worth it to me to drive out there
unless I need a lot of stuff or will be at some other place nearby and I
have not needed to go anywhere near it.

My post was *not* bogus. I said that all of the Albertsons I had checked
out had been out. AFAIK, Winco is the only other store around here that
sells that size. I just haven't been there and don't know when I will get
there.

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On 7/29/2015 8:54 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> Someone in this house likes the little cans of pears to eat with cottage
>> cheese. I normally buy them at Albertsons but two different stores were
>> out. Totally out. They had other sizes of canned pears and the small
>> cans of all other fruits. I remembered that I had bought some at Big
>> Lots. I went there today and they did have them but in heavy syrup.
>> The eater prefers in juice or light syrup. Other stores such as Walmart
>> do not carry the little cans. Yes, I know I could buy other sized cans
>> or the little plastic cups. And I have. But this person wants the
>> little cans. Have you seen these in your area?
>
> You might try going to CVS drugstores and seeing if they have fruit in
> little glass jars. They are packed in light syrup and the jars are these
> cute round things of about 10oz each. They sell for less than a buck and
> the fruits are beautiful - they have to be because they're in glass jars.
> They come from China which may be a problem for some people. It's not for
> me so that works out pretty good.

That would mean going to some other state. No CVS around here. Also don't
want stuff in glass. I have to keep it out in the garage and if glass falls
on the cement floor, it makes quite the mess.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Sky wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 7/31/2015 11:27 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>> >
>> > My dinner tonight is some Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it
>> > beyond tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with
>> > a lot of white onion, salt and pepper and tiny slivers of pie from
>> > PCC.
>>
>> ??HUNH???? Read very carefully what bove has written about her
>> dinner ----->> ". . Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it beyond
>> tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with a lot of
>> white onion . . . "!! So much for 'plain' rice with no meat or
>> veggies, eh!
>>
>> This is yet another example of bove's illogical "thought processes"
>> (cough, cough). Bless her heart, she just can't help herself, can
>> she! ..... where is that violin music . . . . ?
>>
>> Sky
>>
>> P.S. Technically, tomato is a fruit -- not a veggie.
>
> Grin, since I currently see Julie only on the rebound, I grant the
> thought processes there are a bit odd but the dish would ok with some
> added black pepper and hugarian hot-sweet paprika. Other variations of
> course but not too terrible with just those 2 added.

Good grief! Normally when I make Spanish rice, I add tomatoes, peppers and
onion. This was not plain white rice. It was rice with tomato sauce and
seasonings. I had the meat and onions on the side. And I did get straight
A's in biology. I know that a tomato is a fruit. But so is a cucumber.
Yet we eat them both as vegetables.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:25:00 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Gary" > wrote in message
...
>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> > We do eat fresh pears. I asked a very specific thing. You don't
>>>> > have
>>>> > the
>>>> > answer, so shut up. You'll never be a Princess.
>>>>
>>>> What's desirable about being a Princess?
>>>
>>> Unless you are born into royalty in some country that applies, the
>>> term "Princess" in the USA only means (to me) a very spoiled little
>>> girl who has always gotten her way.
>>
>>That would be me!
>
> My first impression of you was the right one.

Good! Let's keep it that way.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:40:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>I always get what I want. It might take awhile but I don't settle for
>>less.
>
> That would account for:
>
> Your house, and it's manifold problems.

Manifold? No clue what that means.

> Your town

I live in a city.

> Your neighbours

Which ones? There is nobody on one side of me and I don't know the others
who moved in on the other side.

> The raccoons

You mean the ones that the trapper took care of?

> Your philandering husband

Do you know something I don't?

> Your spoilt/selfish daughter

Spoiled? Sure. You people here talk like that's a bad thing. It's not!
But I can tell that those who talk like it's a bad thing were not spoiled so
are probably jealous.

> Having to use 17 fans

Me and everyone else. I can't control the weather.

> 'Swap' coolers

Swamp.

> 'good health'

Aside from a patch of psorasis, I seem to be okay at the moment. My A1c is
down.

> Mold in food

How long ago was that?

> etc.
> etc.
> etc.

You need to get a life.

On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:58:39 -0700, sf wrote:

> On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 18:30:05 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> I have no idea who you mean so be plain with no games or just cease.
>
> You're free to check the headers yourself and think about it.

Carol posed a pretty good question and all that Barbara can come back
with is to insinuate that she lacks worse skills than her own self.

"Somebody" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 16:58:39 -0700, sf wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 01 Aug 2015 18:30:05 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>>> I have no idea who you mean so be plain with no games or just cease.
>>
>> You're free to check the headers yourself and think about it.
>
> Carol posed a pretty good question and all that Barbara can come back
> with is to insinuate that she lacks worse skills than her own self.

It was very obvious that sf was referring to Marty.

On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 1:03:47 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 21:57:02 -0700, sf > wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:03:41 -0600, Janet B >
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:20:52 -0700, sf > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:57:46 -0600, Janet B >
> >>> >wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:02:59 -0700, sf > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> >On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 16:05:33 +0000 (UTC), jinx the minx
> >>> >> > wrote:
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >> Janet B > wrote:
> >>> >> >> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:35:21 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> >>> >> >> > > wrote:
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> >>> >> >> >> ...
> >>> >> >> >>> On 7/30/2015 11:33 PM, jinx the minx wrote:
> >>> >> >> >>>> You should be asking YOUR STORE what THEIR issue is
> >>> >> >> >>>> getting/keeping them
> >>> >> >> >>>> in
> >>> >> >> >>
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > snip
> >>> >> >> > I don't go there often because
> >>> >> >> >> of the high prices, or Winco because of the distance. Target
> >>> >> >> >> doesn't sell
> >>> >> >> >> the little cans and neither do the organic type stores.
> >>> >> >> >
> >>> >> >> > Write down exactly what you want on a piece of paper. Do you
> >>> >> >> > remember
> >>> >> >> > the brand? Take the piece of paper to the customer service desk
> >>> >> >> > at
> >>> >> >> > Winco. Request that they stock the item for you,. I usually
> >>> >> >> > get what
> >>> >> >> > I want in 2 days, only once did it take longer. The person
> >>> >> >> > behind the
> >>> >> >> > desk will pass your note to the person who does the ordering
> >>> >> >> > for the
> >>> >> >> > canned fruit section. I have never had them refuse a request
> >>> >> >> > from me.
> >>> >> >> > Don't ask a clerk at the checkout or in the aisle. They have
> >>> >> >> > nothing
> >>> >> >> > to do with stock maintenance.
> >>> >> >> > Janet US
> >>> >> >>
> >>> >> >> Great advice (not that she wants it!). Almost all large chain
> >>> >> >> stores have
> >>> >> >> "contact us" email links on their websites as well. It's always
> >>> >> >> worked for
> >>> >> >> me, since I know the request will be funneled to those that can
> >>> >> >> actually do
> >>> >> >> something about it and not to the "dead air" on the floor.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> >But first, it needs to be in their warehouse to order.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Well, then, why should we even bother to ask? It's maybe not
> >>> >> available to them and she couldn't get it anyway. Let's ask someone
> >>> >> in Hoboken if the cans are available there -- that makes more sense.
> >>> >> Janet US
> >>> >
> >>> >Don't ask me to explain her thought process. I know from personal
> >>> >experience that if it's not in the distribution center, they can't
> >>> >order it. Period. Sure we can submit a request, but it will be an
> >>> >exercise in frustration. I posted a link for pears in 8.5 oz cans.
> >>>
> >>> as I said, I've always had my requests filled. I understand about the
> >>> warehouse. How much effort is it to drop a note off at the customer
> >>> service desk? Surely that should be the first thing you do.
> >>
> >>I go to the customer service desk and they tell me they stock every
> >>item found in the warehouse (it's a big store). I've gone to the
> >>trouble of filling out a request form but who knows if it ever shows
> >>up.
> >
> > I'm speaking specifically of Winco. Julie shops there as do I. I
> > know for a 'fact' that Winco is not selling a store nor building a
> > store in her area. So no disruption problems with her Winco store. I
> > am speaking of the results that I have had with Winco customer service
> > and their warehouses. They are employee owned and very focused on
> > service. Besides, stores are beginning to stock up for
> > 'Back-to-School'. I would think a request for small cans of pears
> > would be met with interest.
> > There is little point in sitting on your hands and asking an
> > international food group regarding availability. I've always felt
> > embarrassed when I haven't checked out the most obvious solution
> > first. Apparently that is not the way she operates. It is easier to
> > shift responsibility elsewhere. At this point she has no idea whether
> > her local store has access or not and is not willing to find out. I'd
> > say the original post was bogus.
> > Logically, consumers must be prepared for price increases and
> > shortages because drought conditions are reducing crop outputs. But
> > we/she will not know if it affects the canned pears and the canned
> > pears price unless she asks someone who can give her an informed
> > answer.
> > Janet US
>
> I never said they were selling a Winco. In fact, they are putting a new one
> in, in Lynnwood where the Top Foods used to be. The problem with Winco is
> that I don't live near it.

Isn't it about 6 miles from your house? That's not very far at all.

I googled "Julie Bove Bothell WA" and "Winco Lynnwood". The latter
search turned up one in Everett, with a "Directions" link. I plugged
in the address returned from the first search into the box, and came
up with 6.2 miles. Estimated travel time was 13 minutes.

Cindy Hamilton

On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 1:16:27 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:40:34 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>I always get what I want. It might take awhile but I don't settle for
> >>less.

No, you don't always get what you want. Sometimes you settle
for nothing at all, and your posts here testify to that.

> > That would account for:
> >
> > Your house, and it's manifold problems.
>
> Manifold? No clue what that means.

plug "manifold definition" into your favorite search engine. Google
returned:

1. many and various.
"the implications of this decision were manifold"

synonyms: many, numerous, multiple, multifarious, legion, diverse, various, several, varied, different, miscellaneous, assorted, sundry


> > Your spoilt/selfish daughter
>
> Spoiled? Sure. You people here talk like that's a bad thing. It's not!
> But I can tell that those who talk like it's a bad thing were not spoiled so
> are probably jealous.

It is a bad thing. That's why we use the same word, spoil, as we use
for soured milk.


Cindy Hamilton

Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Gary" wrote:
> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
> > (assuming she is fine with it).
> >
> > G. :-D
>
> Goes okay with me? What part of being attacked would be okay?

You invite the attacks, Julie. Easy to avoid but you respond
negatively to EVERY SINGLE post. Ignore the anti Julie posts and all
will slowly go away.

You are NOT a real person, imo. You are the ultimate Troll of Usenet.
You write a negative response to every single thing in the known
universe. You really do. You have so many problems and refuse all
fixes from people here. No way is your persona for real. You can't eat
anything, you hate everything, people are mean to you everywhere you
go, you suffer various problems but refuse easy fixes. You hate going
outside but you hate being inside in the heat. Even your hairdresser
had an ac but refused to turn it on when it was hot. This is all
bullshit, Julie.

As I said...I do like you. Down below all these phobias that you have
concocted you seem like a nice person. This is not a putdown...but if
all that you always say here is actually true, Get yourself an
appointment at a good psychiatrist. I say this as a "friend." Go see
one and tell the Dr. everything, don't hold back. You do need
professional help. Your life doesn't need to be so miserable. A good
doctor can help you.

There ya go. That's my honest opinion of Julie. Not said in meanness.
Just my obversation.

In article >, says...
> >
> >> On 7/31/2015 11:27 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> >
> >> > My dinner tonight is some Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it
> >> > beyond tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with
> >> > a lot of white onion, salt and pepper and tiny slivers of pie from
> >> > PCC.
> >>
> >> ??HUNH???? Read very carefully what bove has written about her
> >> dinner ----->> ". . Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it beyond
> >> tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with a lot of
> >> white onion . . . "!! So much for 'plain' rice with no meat or
> >> veggies, eh!
> >>
> >> This is yet another example of bove's illogical "thought processes"
> >> (cough, cough). Bless her heart, she just can't help herself, can
> >> she! ..... where is that violin music . . . . ?
> >>
> >> Sky
> >>
> >> P.S. Technically, tomato is a fruit -- not a veggie.
> >
> > Grin, since I currently see Julie only on the rebound, I grant the
> > thought processes there are a bit odd but the dish would ok with some
> > added black pepper and hugarian hot-sweet paprika. Other variations of
> > course but not too terrible with just those 2 added.
>
> Good grief! Normally when I make Spanish rice, I add tomatoes, peppers and
> onion. This was not plain white rice. It was rice with tomato sauce and
> seasonings. I had the meat and onions on the side.

That is not what you posted

"My dinner tonight is some Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it
beyond tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with
a lot of white onion".

Janet UK

On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 7:43:25 AM UTC-4, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Sunday, August 2, 2015 at 1:16:27 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:

> > Spoiled? Sure. You people here talk like that's a bad thing. It's not!
> > But I can tell that those who talk like it's a bad thing were not spoiled so
> > are probably jealous.
>
> It is a bad thing. That's why we use the same word, spoil, as we use
> for soured milk.

It occurred to me after I hit Post that the word you probably want
is "indulge" rather than "spoil".

Cindy Hamilton

On Thursday, July 30, 2015 at 2:54:54 AM UTC-4, Julie Bove wrote:
> Someone in this house likes the little cans of pears to eat with cottage
> cheese. I normally buy them at Albertsons but two different stores were
> out. Totally out. They had other sizes of canned pears and the small cans
> of all other fruits. I remembered that I had bought some at Big Lots. I
> went there today and they did have them but in heavy syrup. The eater
> prefers in juice or light syrup. Other stores such as Walmart do not carry
> the little cans. Yes, I know I could buy other sized cans or the little
> plastic cups. And I have. But this person wants the little cans. Have you
> seen these in your area?

Thought you were the'disabled person who can barely walk'? Did you experience a remarkable enough recovery to be shopping for pears in different stores? Hmmmm? Don't bother to answer this, Ass.

On 2015-08-02 7:28 AM, wrote:

>> The nyms change maybe once a week. Is it not worth spending a second
>> to click and filter once a week?
>
> I certainly think so, would even if I had to do it daily !


What would work better would be for some dimwits to stop responding to
the children and their bizarre attention seeking behaviour.

Ophelia wrote:
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
> > Ophelia wrote:
> >>
> >> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being attacked
> >> in a
> >> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
> >
> > I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
> > chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
> > hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
> > you're on your own.
>
> Are you saying you have *ever* been attacked at the same level as Julie?
> If you had been, you can be assured I would have been as sickened as I am
> now.

Only Julie gets picked on so much. This is because she won't ingore
mean posts, she responds to everything and gets back what she
deserves.

>
> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
> > (assuming she is fine with it).
> >
>
> *shrug* teasing is not on the same level as the stuff we are subjected to
> here!
>
> Actually I can't remember you getting the same attention! Point to it?

You look it up but it was never the on and on level that Julie gets. I
quit responding after a bit but Julie will continue on and on and on.
She could end this if she would just quit responding to mean posts.
Her behavior tells me that she likes the attention, even if it's
negative attention.

Cheri wrote:
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
> > Ophelia wrote:
> >>
> >> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being attacked
> >> in a
> >> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
> >
> > I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
> > chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
> > hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
> > you're on your own.
> >
> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
> > (assuming she is fine with it).
> >
> > G. :-D
>
> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really nasty
> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
> which is none.

Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.

On 2015-08-02 9:30 AM, Gary wrote:

>> Actually I can't remember you getting the same attention! Point to it?
>
> You look it up but it was never the on and on level that Julie gets. I
> quit responding after a bit but Julie will continue on and on and on.
> She could end this if she would just quit responding to mean posts.
> Her behavior tells me that she likes the attention, even if it's
> negative attention.
>


Bingo. She thrives on the attention. The question is whether her life
is such a dysfunctional and screwed up mess that she thinks there is any
truth to her posts or whether she is deliberately lying to generate the
attention that she thrives on.

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 13:47:52 +0100, Janet > wrote:

> In article >, says...
> > >
> > >> On 7/31/2015 11:27 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > My dinner tonight is some Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it
> > >> > beyond tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with
> > >> > a lot of white onion, salt and pepper and tiny slivers of pie from
> > >> > PCC.
> > >>
> > >> ??HUNH???? Read very carefully what bove has written about her
> > >> dinner ----->> ". . Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it beyond
> > >> tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with a lot of
> > >> white onion . . . "!! So much for 'plain' rice with no meat or
> > >> veggies, eh!
> > >>
> > >> This is yet another example of bove's illogical "thought processes"
> > >> (cough, cough). Bless her heart, she just can't help herself, can
> > >> she! ..... where is that violin music . . . . ?
> > >>
> > >> Sky
> > >>
> > >> P.S. Technically, tomato is a fruit -- not a veggie.
> > >
> > > Grin, since I currently see Julie only on the rebound, I grant the
> > > thought processes there are a bit odd but the dish would ok with some
> > > added black pepper and hugarian hot-sweet paprika. Other variations of
> > > course but not too terrible with just those 2 added.
> >
> > Good grief! Normally when I make Spanish rice, I add tomatoes, peppers and
> > onion. This was not plain white rice. It was rice with tomato sauce and
> > seasonings. I had the meat and onions on the side.
>
> That is not what you posted
>
> "My dinner tonight is some Spanish rice with no meat or veg in it
> beyond tomato sauce, some ground beef simply cooked in chunks with
> a lot of white onion".
>
> Janet UK

Too bad she didn't call it "deconstructed Spanish Rice".

--

sf

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > Ophelia wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being
>> >> attacked
>> >> in a
>> >> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
>> >
>> > I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
>> > chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
>> > hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
>> > you're on your own.
>> >
>> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
>> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
>> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
>> > (assuming she is fine with it).
>> >
>> > G. :-D
>>
>> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really nasty
>> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
>> which is none.
>
> Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
> daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.

He's the worst one for sure, but not the only one by a long shot.

Cheri

On 8/1/2015 11:16 PM, Julie Bove wrote:
>
>> Your house, and it's manifold problems.
>
> Manifold? No clue what that means.

"multiple"

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...

>>> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really nasty
>>> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
>>> which is none.
>>
>> Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
>> daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.
>
> He's the worst one for sure, but not the only one by a long shot.

There is so much meanness here, I think it rubs off on many folk ....

Worried O <sigh>


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 8/2/2015 6:05 AM, Gary wrote:
> Get yourself an
> appointment at a good psychiatrist. I say this as a "friend." Go see
> one and tell the Dr. everything, don't hold back. You do need
> professional help. Your life doesn't need to be so miserable. A good
> doctor can help you.


You license to practice psychiatry was issued in which state?

On 8/2/2015 7:02 AM, Kalmia wrote:
> Don't bother to answer this, Ass.


**** off and ram an icepick in your bully eyehole, BIOPTCH!

On 8/2/2015 7:48 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> The question is whether her life is such a dysfunctional and screwed up
> mess that she thinks


**** off, ex-cop bull biotch!

On 8/2/2015 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > Ophelia wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being >>
>>> attacked
>>> >> in a
>>> >> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
>>> >
>>> > I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
>>> > chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
>>> > hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
>>> > you're on your own.
>>> >
>>> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
>>> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
>>> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
>>> > (assuming she is fine with it).
>>> >
>>> > G. :-D
>>>
>>> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really nasty
>>> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
>>> which is none.
>>
>> Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
>> daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.
>
> He's the worst one for sure, but not the only one by a long shot.
>
> Cheri


Notice when challenged on his own terms he refuses to say how long HIS
son's rap sheet is...

Telling.

On 8/2/2015 10:11 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>>> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really
>>>> nasty
>>>> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
>>>> which is none.
>>>
>>> Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
>>> daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.
>>
>> He's the worst one for sure, but not the only one by a long shot.
>
> There is so much meanness here, I think it rubs off on many folk ....
>
> Worried O <sigh>
>
>
Just keep spreading the LIGHT, as dsi1 does, and all can be healed.

On Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:32:16 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
>> > Ophelia wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Guess what? I would be just as disgusted if it were you being attacked
>> >> in a
>> >> similar manner ... or would I after that ... hmm ...
>> >
>> > I've been attacked many times here and I've noticed that NOBODY ever
>> > chimes in on my behalf. Not YOU either. Later down the road though, I
>> > hear many with my same beliefs. Seems if you are attacked here,
>> > you're on your own.
>> >
>> > And as I said, I really like Julie but I think she likes that negative
>> > attention too and this is why I will occasionally tease her. I'm fine
>> > with it as long as it goes ok with her. It all is kind of amusing
>> > (assuming she is fine with it).
>> >
>> > G. :-D
>>
>> Attacking a child is not amusing though, and many have said really nasty
>> things about her daughter which shows what kind of character they have,
>> which is none.
>
>Don't know about many but good ol Bryan has said mean things about the
>daughter. I don't go there or agree with that.

Actually ONLY Julie is responsible for any meaness posted about her
daughter because had she STFU about her daughter no one would say
anything about her.