Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > >> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. > > I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste > thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, > etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no > petro chemicals. > > John Kuthe... > One word - sterno |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:57:01 AM UTC-4, wrote:
> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. Try a chimney starter. Of course nowadays it might be challenging to find newspaper to put into it. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 3:46 AM, Directorate of Troll Removal and Disposal wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD! Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127. Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record ID: 47846596. Your ass has more mass than Jupiter! No one cares about you. Get OUT! _,..._ /__ \ >< `. \ /_ \ | \-_ /:| ,--'..'. : ,' `. _,' \ _.._,--'' , | , ,',, _| _,.'| | | \\||/,'(,' '--'' | | | _ ||| | /-' | | | (- -)<`._ | / / | | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ / | | / \ / -'| `--.'| | | \___/ / / | | H H / | | |_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| | |-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | | | | | | \_ | Barbara Llorente | | | | | | The | |____| | | |Troll Enabler | _..' | |____| jrei | |_(____..._' _.' | `-..______..-'"" (___..--' |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 3:46 AM, Directorate of Troll Removal and Disposal wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD! Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127. Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record ID: 47846596. Your ass has more mass than Jupiter! No one cares about you. Get OUT! _,..._ /__ \ >< `. \ /_ \ | \-_ /:| ,--'..'. : ,' `. _,' \ _.._,--'' , | , ,',, _| _,.'| | | \\||/,'(,' '--'' | | | _ ||| | /-' | | | (- -)<`._ | / / | | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ / | | / \ / -'| `--.'| | | \___/ / / | | H H / | | |_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| | |-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | | | | | | \_ | Barbara Llorente | | | | | | The | |____| | | |Troll Enabler | _..' | |____| jrei | |_(____..._' _.' | `-..______..-'"" (___..--' |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:30:21 AM UTC-6, Sal Paradise wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote: > > On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > > > >> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. > > > > I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste > > thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, > > etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no > > petro chemicals. > > > > John Kuthe... > > > One word - sterno For you...diesel fuel...at least a quart. === |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 12:47 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:30:21 AM UTC-6, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: >>> >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. >>> >>> I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste >>> thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, >>> etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no >>> petro chemicals. >>> >>> John Kuthe... >>> >> One word - sterno > > For you...diesel fuel...at least a quart. > === > Oh come on Roy, don't be such a dog in the manger. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:53:08 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote: > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:57:01 AM UTC-4, wrote: > > Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. > > Try a chimney starter. Of course nowadays it might be challenging to > find newspaper to put into it. > Search Amazon or Google for: electric barbeque starter. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 4:47 AM, Roy wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:30:21 AM UTC-6, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote: >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: >>> >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. >>> >>> I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste >>> thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, >>> etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no >>> petro chemicals. >>> >>> John Kuthe... >>> >> One word - sterno > > For you...diesel fuel...at least a quart. > === > The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. Although the Constitution does not include the phrase "Separation of Church & State," neither does it say "Freedom of religion." However, the Constitution implies both in the 1st Amendment. As to our freedoms, the 1st Amendment provides exclusionary wording: Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [bold caps, mine] Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States." There existed little controversy about this interpretation from our Founding Fathers. If religionists better understood the concept of separation of Church & State, they would realize that the wall of separation actually protects their religion. Our secular government allows the free expression of religion and non-religion. Today, religions flourish in America; we have more churches than Seven-Elevens. Although many secular and atheist groups today support and fight for the wall of separation, this does not mean that they wish to lawfully eliminate religion from society. On the contrary, you will find no secular or atheist group attempting to ban Christianity, or any other religion from American society. Keeping religion separate allows atheists and religionists alike, to practice their belief systems, regardless how ridiculous they may seem, without government intervention. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 6:11 AM, dsi1 wrote:
If any of these associations raised questions in the mind of George Bush, Jr., he had little incentive to voice them. Besides getting Harken stock through the deal, Junior was paid $80,000 a year as a consultant (until 1989, when his wages were increased to $120,000; recently they were reduced to $45,000). He was also allowed to borrow $180,375 from the company at very low interest rates. In 1989 and 1990, according to the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Harken's board "forgave" $341,000 in loans to its executives. In addition, Junior took advantage of the company's ultraliberal executive stock purchase plan, which allowed him to buy Harken stock at 40 percent below market value. Such lavish executive compensation would suggest a company doing quite well indeed. But in reality, Harken had little going for itself. One Wall Street analyst called Harken's web of insider stock deals and mounting debt "a lot of jiggery-pokery." Harken was not making money and could not have continued into 1990 without at least some means of convincing lenders and investors that the company would soon find a lot of oil. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 6:06 AM, sf wrote:
If any of these associations raised questions in the mind of George Bush, Jr., he had little incentive to voice them. Besides getting Harken stock through the deal, Junior was paid $80,000 a year as a consultant (until 1989, when his wages were increased to $120,000; recently they were reduced to $45,000). He was also allowed to borrow $180,375 from the company at very low interest rates. In 1989 and 1990, according to the company's Securities and Exchange Commission filing, Harken's board "forgave" $341,000 in loans to its executives. In addition, Junior took advantage of the company's ultraliberal executive stock purchase plan, which allowed him to buy Harken stock at 40 percent below market value. Such lavish executive compensation would suggest a company doing quite well indeed. But in reality, Harken had little going for itself. One Wall Street analyst called Harken's web of insider stock deals and mounting debt "a lot of jiggery-pokery." Harken was not making money and could not have continued into 1990 without at least some means of convincing lenders and investors that the company would soon find a lot of oil. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:20:23 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > On 7/31/2015 10:05 AM, wrote: > > > Why use that nasty lighter > > fluid when a chimney starter leaves no awful aftertaste and > > is a very simple method to light charcoal? > > > > A fire chimney is no way to treat God's gift to mankind. Fire must be > celebrated and gazed into with reverence and awe, not trapped, > suppressed, and hidden away. ![]() > > I'll gaze at that fire with reverence once it's going and has been released from the chimney starter. ;-) P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a burned nose/face. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:07:57 PM UTC-7, Sal Paradise wrote:
> On 8/1/2015 4:47 AM, Roy wrote: > > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:30:21 AM UTC-6, Sal Paradise wrote: > >> On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote: > >>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: > >>> > >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. > >>> > >>> I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste > >>> thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, > >>> etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no > >>> petro chemicals. > >>> > >>> John Kuthe... > >>> > >> One word - sterno > > > > For you...diesel fuel...at least a quart. > > === > > > The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America > and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms > a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, > Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the > Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The > U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in > the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a > more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not > come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers > purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. > > Although the Constitution does not include the phrase "Separation of > Church & State," neither does it say "Freedom of religion." However, the > Constitution implies both in the 1st Amendment. As to our freedoms, the > 1st Amendment provides exclusionary wording: > > Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, > or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of > speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to > assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. > [bold caps, mine] > > Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his > January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist > Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." > Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation > between religion and government in the Constitution of the United > States." There existed little controversy about this interpretation from > our Founding Fathers. > > If religionists better understood the concept of separation of Church & > State, they would realize that the wall of separation actually protects > their religion. Our secular government allows the free expression of > religion and non-religion. Today, religions flourish in America; we have > more churches than Seven-Elevens. > > Although many secular and atheist groups today support and fight for the > wall of separation, this does not mean that they wish to lawfully > eliminate religion from society. On the contrary, you will find no > secular or atheist group attempting to ban Christianity, or any other > religion from American society. Keeping religion separate allows > atheists and religionists alike, to practice their belief systems, > regardless how ridiculous they may seem, without government intervention. Can I still use my BBQ? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: >> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand >> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be >> water. >> > > I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: >>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand >>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be >>> water. >>> >> >> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. > > Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the freaking 60's up there! http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 2:28 PM, wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:20:23 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote: >> >> On 7/31/2015 10:05 AM, wrote: >> >>> Why use that nasty lighter >>> fluid when a chimney starter leaves no awful aftertaste and >>> is a very simple method to light charcoal? >>> >> >> A fire chimney is no way to treat God's gift to mankind. Fire must be >> celebrated and gazed into with reverence and awe, not trapped, >> suppressed, and hidden away. ![]() >> >> > I'll gaze at that fire with reverence once it's going and > has been released from the chimney starter. > > ;-) > > P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips > when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper > vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a > burned nose/face. > You want to look at those Jack Daniels oak barrel chips, really. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 2:35 PM, wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 1:07:57 PM UTC-7, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 8/1/2015 4:47 AM, Roy wrote: >>> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 10:30:21 AM UTC-6, Sal Paradise wrote: >>>> On 7/31/2015 10:17 AM, John Kuthe wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 08:56:55 -0700 (PDT), wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. >>>>> >>>>> I used horrible stuff to ignite charcoal for years. A can of "waste >>>>> thinner" my father kept in the basement, from cleaning paint brushes, >>>>> etc. I've switched to charcoal lighting chimneys now. Much nicer, no >>>>> petro chemicals. >>>>> >>>>> John Kuthe... >>>>> >>>> One word - sterno >>> >>> For you...diesel fuel...at least a quart. >>> === >>> >> The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America >> and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms >> a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, >> Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the >> Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The >> U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in >> the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a >> more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not >> come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers >> purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. >> >> Although the Constitution does not include the phrase "Separation of >> Church & State," neither does it say "Freedom of religion." However, the >> Constitution implies both in the 1st Amendment. As to our freedoms, the >> 1st Amendment provides exclusionary wording: >> >> Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, >> or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of >> speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to >> assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. >> [bold caps, mine] >> >> Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his >> January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist >> Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." >> Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation >> between religion and government in the Constitution of the United >> States." There existed little controversy about this interpretation from >> our Founding Fathers. >> >> If religionists better understood the concept of separation of Church & >> State, they would realize that the wall of separation actually protects >> their religion. Our secular government allows the free expression of >> religion and non-religion. Today, religions flourish in America; we have >> more churches than Seven-Elevens. >> >> Although many secular and atheist groups today support and fight for the >> wall of separation, this does not mean that they wish to lawfully >> eliminate religion from society. On the contrary, you will find no >> secular or atheist group attempting to ban Christianity, or any other >> religion from American society. Keeping religion separate allows >> atheists and religionists alike, to practice their belief systems, >> regardless how ridiculous they may seem, without government intervention. > > Can I still use my BBQ? > That was a frogged post by the "Groupkillas". But yes, sure you can. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 3:17 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand >>>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be >>>> water. >>>> >>> >>> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. >> >> Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? > > Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I > ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is > going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the > freaking 60's up there! > > http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 > Look now, if ya'll are goiing to keep doing that we're never going to get Jodie Foster back home... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Le vendredi 31 juillet 2015 16:57:01 UTC+1, a écrit*:
> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be water. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdaqDVKOWfI |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:37:54 PM UTC-5, Sal Paradise wrote:
> > On 7/31/2015 2:28 PM, wrote: > > > > > P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips > > when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper > > vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a > > burned nose/face. > > > > You want to look at those Jack Daniels oak barrel chips, really. > > I see them in the store but have never tried a bag. Imparts good flavor?? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 8:53:43 PM UTC-5, wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:37:54 PM UTC-5, Sal Paradise wrote: > > > > On 7/31/2015 2:28 PM, wrote: > > > > > > > > P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips > > > when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper > > > vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a > > > burned nose/face. > > > > > > > You want to look at those Jack Daniels oak barrel chips, really. > > > > > I see them in the store but have never tried a bag. Imparts > good flavor?? If you like whisky and oak. I prefer hickory. --Bryan |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 12:41:24 PM UTC-10, Sal Paradise wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 3:17 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote: > >> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >>> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: > >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand > >>>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be > >>>> water. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. > >> > >> Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? > > > > Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I > > ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is > > going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the > > freaking 60's up there! > > > > http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 > > > > Look now, if ya'll are goiing to keep doing that we're never going to > get Jodie Foster back home... Da Hawaiians need one famous Hollywood movie star to stand in the lines with them. I don't like what they're doing but that would be pretty darn cool... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 7:53 PM, wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:37:54 PM UTC-5, Sal Paradise wrote: >> >> On 7/31/2015 2:28 PM, wrote: >> >>> >>> P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips >>> when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper >>> vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a >>> burned nose/face. >>> >> >> You want to look at those Jack Daniels oak barrel chips, really. >> >> > I see them in the store but have never tried a bag. Imparts > good flavor?? > Oh my yes, the very best. Oak is a mild wood and that whiskey mash tang just totally works with it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 8:04 PM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 8:53:43 PM UTC-5, wrote: >> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 5:37:54 PM UTC-5, Sal Paradise wrote: >>> >>> On 7/31/2015 2:28 PM, wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> P.S. I love the smell of hickory, too. I use wood chips >>>> when I use my Weber as a smoker and I could stand over the upper >>>> vent and inhale that aroma. But that would result in a >>>> burned nose/face. >>>> >>> >>> You want to look at those Jack Daniels oak barrel chips, really. >>> >>> >> I see them in the store but have never tried a bag. Imparts >> good flavor?? > > If you like whisky and oak. I prefer hickory. > > --Bryan > To make your switches with? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/31/2015 8:26 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 12:41:24 PM UTC-10, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 3:17 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote: >>>> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: >>>>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand >>>>>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be >>>>>> water. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. >>>> >>>> Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? >>> >>> Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I >>> ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is >>> going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the >>> freaking 60's up there! >>> >>> http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 >>> >> >> Look now, if ya'll are goiing to keep doing that we're never going to >> get Jodie Foster back home... > > Da Hawaiians need one famous Hollywood movie star to stand in the lines with them. I don't like what they're doing but that would be pretty darn cool... > Lol! Ironic too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:41:24 PM UTC-7, Sal Paradise wrote:
> On 7/31/2015 3:17 PM, dsi1 wrote: > > On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote: > >> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: > >>> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: > >>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand > >>>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be > >>>> water. > >>>> > >>> > >>> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. > >> > >> Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? > > > > Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I > > ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is > > going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the > > freaking 60's up there! > > > > http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 > > > > Look now, if ya'll are goiing to keep doing that we're never going to > get Jodie Foster back home... That reminds me, I need a new turkey baster this Thanksgiving. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 6:22 AM, wrote:
> On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 3:41:24 PM UTC-7, Sal Paradise wrote: >> On 7/31/2015 3:17 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>> On 7/31/2015 10:47 AM, Sal Paradise wrote: >>>> On 7/31/2015 2:11 PM, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On 7/31/2015 5:56 AM, wrote: >>>>>> Looks like Kingsford is still the best. I tried Safeway Brand >>>>>> charcoal lighter fluid to save a buck but the stuff might as well be >>>>>> water. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I love the smell of Kingsford in the morning. Smells like... hickory. >>>> >>>> Ha, Hawaiian Cavalry? >>> >>> Da Hawaiians love the smell of the ocean spray in the morning - and I >>> ain't talking about cranberry juice. Hee hee. My granddaughter's aunt is >>> going to join the group of protesters on the big island - it's like the >>> freaking 60's up there! >>> >>> http://www.businessinsider.com/thirt...una-kea-2015-6 >>> >> >> Look now, if ya'll are goiing to keep doing that we're never going to >> get Jodie Foster back home... > > That reminds me, I need a new turkey baster this Thanksgiving. > Ask Hawking to pay for it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 12:46 PM, Directorate of Troll Removal and Disposal wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD! Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127. Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record ID: 47846596. Your ass has more mass than Jupiter! No one cares about you. Get OUT! _,..._ /__ \ >< `. \ /_ \ | \-_ /:| ,--'..'. : ,' `. _,' \ _.._,--'' , | , ,',, _| _,.'| | | \\||/,'(,' '--'' | | | _ ||| | /-' | | | (- -)<`._ | / / | | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ / | | / \ / -'| `--.'| | | \___/ / / | | H H / | | |_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| | |-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | | | | | | \_ | Barbara Llorente | | | | | | The | |____| | | |Troll Enabler | _..' | |____| jrei | |_(____..._' _.' | `-..______..-'"" (___..--' |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 10:10 AM, Directorate of Troll Removal and Disposal wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD! Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127. Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record ID: 47846596. Your ass has more mass than Jupiter! No one cares about you. Get OUT! _,..._ /__ \ >< `. \ /_ \ | \-_ /:| ,--'..'. : ,' `. _,' \ _.._,--'' , | , ,',, _| _,.'| | | \\||/,'(,' '--'' | | | _ ||| | /-' | | | (- -)<`._ | / / | | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ / | | / \ / -'| `--.'| | | \___/ / / | | H H / | | |_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| | |-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | | | | | | \_ | Barbara Llorente | | | | | | The | |____| | | |Troll Enabler | _..' | |____| jrei | |_(____..._' _.' | `-..______..-'"" (___..--' |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 9:20 AM, Cooking7g wrote:
The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense founded on the Christian religion The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 12:23 PM, dsi1 wrote:
The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense founded on the Christian religion The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. Although the Constitution does not include the phrase "Separation of Church & State," neither does it say "Freedom of religion." However, the Constitution implies both in the 1st Amendment. As to our freedoms, the 1st Amendment provides exclusionary wording: Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [bold caps, mine] Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States." There existed little controversy about this interpretation from our Founding Fathers. If religionists better understood the concept of separation of Church & State, they would realize that the wall of separation actually protects their religion. Our secular government allows the free expression of religion and non-religion. Today, religions flourish in America; we have more churches than Seven-Elevens. Although many secular and atheist groups today support and fight for the wall of separation, this does not mean that they wish to lawfully eliminate religion from society. On the contrary, you will find no secular or atheist group attempting to ban Christianity, or any other religion from American society. Keeping religion separate allows atheists and religionists alike, to practice their belief systems, regardless how ridiculous they may seem, without government intervention. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/1/2015 12:26 PM, dsi1 wrote:
The Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense founded on the Christian religion The United States Constitution serves as the law of the land for America and indicates the intent of our Founding Fathers. The Constitution forms a secular document, and nowhere does it appeal to God, Christianity, Jesus, or any supreme being. (For those who think the date of the Constitution contradicts the last sentence, see note 1 at the end.) The U.S. government derives from people (not God), as it clearly states in the preamble: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect Union...." The omission of God in the Constitution did not come out of forgetfulness, but rather out of the Founding Fathers purposeful intentions to keep government separate from religion. Although the Constitution does not include the phrase "Separation of Church & State," neither does it say "Freedom of religion." However, the Constitution implies both in the 1st Amendment. As to our freedoms, the 1st Amendment provides exclusionary wording: Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. [bold caps, mine] Thomas Jefferson made an interpretation of the 1st Amendment to his January 1st, 1802 letter to the Committee of the Danbury Baptist Association calling it a "wall of separation between church and State." Madison had also written that "Strongly guarded. . . is the separation between religion and government in the Constitution of the United States." There existed little controversy about this interpretation from our Founding Fathers. If religionists better understood the concept of separation of Church & State, they would realize that the wall of separation actually protects their religion. Our secular government allows the free expression of religion and non-religion. Today, religions flourish in America; we have more churches than Seven-Elevens. Although many secular and atheist groups today support and fight for the wall of separation, this does not mean that they wish to lawfully eliminate religion from society. On the contrary, you will find no secular or atheist group attempting to ban Christianity, or any other religion from American society. Keeping religion separate allows atheists and religionists alike, to practice their belief systems, regardless how ridiculous they may seem, without government intervention. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Best Fire Lighter Fluid? | Barbecue | |||
On a lighter note... opinions, please :) | General Cooking | |||
DCS Lighter gone nuts...! | Cooking Equipment | |||
DCS Lighter gone nuts...! | General Cooking | |||
On a lighter side... | General Cooking |