On 8/10/2015 7:28 PM, gtr wrote:
> I've got scores of killfile elements


Not bad, for a nekkid troller.

On 8/10/2015 7:22 PM, gtr wrote:
>> The real exchange of ideas stopped here years ago.
>
> Not so for me. I only began attending a few years ago and have gleaned
> (digging through fields of muck), quite a few really good pointers in
> direction and very good info on specific interests.


You made this a political war zone, you ASSHOLE!

On 8/10/2015 7:19 PM, gtr wrote:
> The topic is discarded for personal attack.


As are you, lying hypocrite troll!

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 16:24:30 -0300, wrote:

>However, did you realise you were cross posting?? Cos you were, I've
>taken it out and just left rfc.

He cross-posted?!? Holy Jesus... and I thought Hitler was an arsehole.

On 8/10/2015 9:39 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> A fully grown,
> supposedly sane woman acting that way. She's not really so sane
> anymore.
>
> -sw


Hmmm...understand this is how YOU treat women, stalker boy:

> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:36:39 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr wrote:
>
>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>
>The best way to handle the assholes is to ignore them *completely*.
>Don't even acknowledge their existence with posts like these.

That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 20:43:51 +0000 (UTC), Mitchell Brown
> wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:36:39 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr wrote:
>>
>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>
>> The best way to handle the assholes is to ignore them *completely*.
>> Don't even acknowledge their existence with posts like these.
>>
>A killfile works just fine.

It does indeed, unfortunately there are imbeciles that still reply to
it.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 11:37:13 -1000, dsi1
> wrote:

>I have seen posts like this for a long while. "Don't respond to the
>trolls" has never worked.

It does and has worked, many times. But a retard like you keeps on
replying to it. There really is no limit to your stupidity, is there?

>My guess is that our only hope is Google
>Groups because they can decide who posts and what get archived.

'My guess' is your family is very generous to you.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr > wrote:

>I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>
>How does it happen? One to three assholes consistently ride the pony
>with bile and anger and angst and an endless series of faux vendettas,
>all of it fashioned to look like something they care about, when in
>fact it is primarily a proxy way to engage the world for folks that
>apparently have no social contact otherwise. They can fight, they can
>vent, they can stalk, but otherwise they've got almost nothing to offer.
>
>Every post on topic eventually becomes bickering and insults. Each
>such conclusion begins to happen more rapidly; at first there are still
>8 posts on topic, before the flood gate opens, then it's only two.
>Hapless people, who ostensibly care about the newsgroup, but only know
>how to respond in kind, participate in suffocating the group. I use to
>say "when somebody slaps, I slap back". I ditched that approach about
>8 years ago seeing that all groups then become slap-groups and no
>substantive discussion has a chance to breath.
>
>I saw that happen to a fabulous group on afro-cuban music;
>rec.music.afro-cuban. It became a bulletin board for the same
>anti-semetic rants, mostly cut-and-paste from websites. After a couple
>of years his lone voice eventually stopped. Everybody else vanished to
>some laundered and rigid "bulletin board" with a different
>time-consuming UI than all the other different and time-consuming UI's
>out there. The job is about complete at rec.arts.movies.past-films,
>and seemingly rec.food.cooking is hanging on by its fingernails as 1
>(or is it 3) people have no other life than a daily name change and
>cut-and-paste roadblocks. And then of course all their incensed prey,
>nobly, dutifully slapping back; blocking all blood to vital organs.
>There's another 8 or 10 of these I've seen die in the past 15 years.
>
>As long as y'all insist on endlessly giving hand-jobs to the 1 (or is
>it 8) trolls whose only objective here is to kill discourse, the result
>will be the same.
>
>Usenet is just a snapshot: This is happening on a much bigger level as
>politics becomes an opportunity for dismemberment alone. I use to have
>substantive debates with Republicans over policy. Now "substance" is
>primarily the ludicrous Fox daily lies, Limbaughs empty agitprop,
>whether the president is a Kenyan or a Mooslim. And I hold up my end
>with outrage. Instead of policy on climate change and illegal
>immigration, we're bickering about what Donald Trump or Sarah Palin
>said. Instead of politics--or even political propaganda--we're
>bickering about celebrities and racist one-liners. And I've been a
>participant in changing the subject from something to nothing! The
>Republicans would rather have us bickering about bullshit than arguing
>about policy; when they control the discourse there will be no
>discourse.
>
>What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in
>life is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree
>to which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated
>into facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.

You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:22:19 -0700, gtr > wrote:

>On 2015-08-11 00:23:50 +0000, sf said:
>
>> Truth be told, the best food related, informative, exchanges that have
>> happened here in
>> the last few years have come from the troll who is hunting the trolls
>> that consider rfc their safe place and hide out here.

Incredible thing to say. I wouldn't be surprised if the casa troll
really is sf, or closely connected somehow. Or is she simply *that*
pathetic and mean spirited that she says things like that because the
casa troll goes after her 'enemies' on RFC?

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:21:11 -0400, pltrgyst > wrote:

>On 8/10/15 3:08 PM, gtr wrote:
>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>....
>> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in life
>> is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree to
>> which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated into
>> facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
>
>Just use your killfile liberally, and it's not a problem.

Yeah, if only everyone did that, it wouldn't be an issue.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 22:39:01 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:22:19 -0700, gtr wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-11 00:23:50 +0000, sf said:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 14:27:26 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>>
>>>> And as they vanish from these various groups, interested people like me
>>>> lose their interest in exchanging ideas here.
>>>
>>> The real exchange of ideas stopped here years ago.
>>
>> Not so for me. I only began attending a few years ago and have gleaned
>> (digging through fields of muck), quite a few really good pointers in
>> direction and very good info on specific interests.
>>
>>> Truth be told, the best food related, informative, exchanges that have
>>> happened here in
>>> the last few years have come from the troll who is hunting the trolls
>>> that consider rfc their safe place and hide out here.
>>
>> I don't understand any of that.
>
>It's really not meant to understood. Barbara thinks that the
>multi-nym, 250-posts-a-day troll is doing RFC a favor, ridding the
>group of what she considers all the "bad apples" (namely myself and
>Marty, and now practically all the other regulars who speak out
>against them). She supports the psychotic troll and everything he's
>doing here.
>
>That's why it's so hard to understand. Weird, huh? A fully grown,
>supposedly sane woman acting that way. She's not really so sane
>anymore.

There's something seriously wrong with the woman as far as I am
concerned. Bitter, nasty and mean-spirited. She condones this bullshit
for the most pathetic of reasons.

On 8/10/2015 9:51 PM, Je�us wrote:
> Incredible thing to say. I wouldn't be surprised if the casa troll
> really is sf, or closely connected somehow.


Ekshually...no.

Really.

Fantasize as you must, shrimpie.

On 2015-08-11 03:42:50 +0000, Jeßus said:

> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:36:39 -0500, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr wrote:
>>
>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>
>> The best way to handle the assholes is to ignore them *completely*.
>> Don't even acknowledge their existence with posts like these.
>
> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?

"...unfortunately there are imbeciles that still reply to it."

On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:

> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.

No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the planet.

Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.

On 2015-08-11 03:51:39 +0000, Jeßus said:

> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:21:11 -0400, pltrgyst > wrote:
>
>> On 8/10/15 3:08 PM, gtr wrote:
>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>> ....
>>> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in life
>>> is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree to
>>> which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated into
>>> facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
>>
>> Just use your killfile liberally, and it's not a problem.
>
> Yeah, if only everyone did that, it wouldn't be an issue.

There are many ways that can't be done that would solve the a problem.

On 8/10/2015 10:04 PM, gtr wrote:
> On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>
> No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the
> planet.

I call BULLSHIT!

You claimed some high ground you will never lift your withered leg on,
you hypocritical partisan political TROLL!

> Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
> flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.

Pot/kettle/black.

You subhuman lying assmunch!

On 8/10/2015 10:05 PM, gtr wrote:
> On 2015-08-11 03:51:39 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:21:11 -0400, pltrgyst > wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/10/15 3:08 PM, gtr wrote:
>>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>> ....
>>>> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in
>>>> life
>>>> is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree to
>>>> which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated into
>>>> facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
>>>
>>> Just use your killfile liberally, and it's not a problem.
>>
>> Yeah, if only everyone did that, it wouldn't be an issue.
>
> There are many ways that can't be done that would solve the a problem.
>
Ice pick to your forehead is a decent start.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:04:34 -0700, gtr > wrote:

>On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>
>No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the planet.
>
>Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
>flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.

I rest my case.

On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:00:30 -0700, gtr > wrote:

>On 2015-08-11 03:42:50 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:36:39 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>>
>>> The best way to handle the assholes is to ignore them *completely*.
>>> Don't even acknowledge their existence with posts like these.
>>
>> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
>> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
>> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
>> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?
>
>"...unfortunately there are imbeciles that still reply to it."

And?

On 8/10/2015 10:14 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 21:04:34 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:
>>
>>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>>
>> No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the planet.
>>
>> Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
>> flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.
>
> I rest my case.
>


Upon your own demonstrably trollish head.

"gtr" > wrote in message news:2015081021003028590-xxx@yyyzzz...
> On 2015-08-11 03:42:50 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:36:39 -0500, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>>
>>> The best way to handle the assholes is to ignore them *completely*.
>>> Don't even acknowledge their existence with posts like these.
>>
>> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
>> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
>> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
>> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?
>
> "...unfortunately there are imbeciles that still reply to it."

Well, starting this thread and crossposting didn't help much either. Just
sayin.

Cheri

On 2015-08-10 11:42 PM, Je�us wrote:

> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?
>


It's easy enough to kill file the troll. It is just as easy to kill file
those who reply to too many of them too often. The problem is that too
many people reply to them too often. Even when the idiots are filtered,
there are still relatively normal people who are incapable of ignoring
them.

On 8/10/2015 11:48 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>
>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>
>> ...
>> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in
>> life is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree
>> to which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated
>> into facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
>
> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>

His claim to being just one of guys is belied by his ongoing
pontifications in which he always claims the high moral ground.

On 8/11/2015 12:04 AM, gtr wrote:
> On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:
>
>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>
> No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the
> planet.
>
> Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
> flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.
>

The basic problem in this NG lies with William Ahearn and his bizarre
flames and rants.
For no reason at all, he'll start up with someone and once on his list,
that person never gets off.
He'll continue with his insults ad nauseum and when the other person
responds, Ahearn's sycophants come out of the woodwork in his "defense",
while Ahearn's detractors are all too willing to put their two cents in,
thereby creating chaos.
I don't know if Ahearn is gone for good or not.
History suggests his neurosis will eventually force him back.
A person could clean out their RAMP-F killfile, leaving just Ahearn in
it and probably miss 95% of the crap is this newsgroup.

On 8/11/2015 4:44 AM, wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:19:02 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>
>> On 2015-08-11 00:06:38 +0000, said:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:21:44 -0400, William Ahernia
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 8/10/2015 5:10 PM, gtr wrote:
>>>>> There are assholes most everywhere. They are here because
>>>>> they are engaged.
>>>>
>>>> Precisely why you come here.
>>>> That and to pontificate how much better you are than the hoi polloi from
>>>> atop your imagined high horse.
>>
>> Perfect example: The topic is discarded for personal attack.
>>
>>> We got this because you were cross posting, basic usenet good manners,
>>> do not cross post.
>>
>> Again, my apologies, Lucretia: The response was from precisely one of
>> the primary vermin that are currently destroying the
>> rec.arts.movies.past-films.
>>
> Well you have now introduced them to this group, as if it needed more!

OH have a cow then, hag.

You're as bad as any here and always have been.

On 8/11/2015 6:20 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-08-10 11:42 PM, Je�us wrote:
>
>> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
>> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
>> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
>> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?
>>
>
>
> It's easy enough to kill file the troll. It is just as easy to kill file
> those who reply to too many of them too often. The problem is that too
> many people reply to them too often. Even when the idiots are filtered,
> there are still relatively normal people who are incapable of ignoring
> them.


Says the ex-cop bully who trolls Julie REAL hard until I kick him in his
yellow teeth...

On 8/11/2015 9:25 AM, Moses wrote:
> On 8/11/2015 12:04 AM, gtr wrote:
>> On 2015-08-11 03:48:06 +0000, Jeßus said:
>>
>>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>>
>> No, I don't. I'm just a schlub--like you, and every other person on the
>> planet.
>>
>> Thank you for clearly demonstrating the basic MO of most trolls and
>> flame-baiters: Change the topic to the participants.
>>
>
> The basic problem in this NG lies with William Ahearn and his bizarre
> flames and rants.
> For no reason at all, he'll start up with someone and once on his list,
> that person never gets off.
> He'll continue with his insults ad nauseum and when the other person
> responds, Ahearn's sycophants come out of the woodwork in his "defense",
> while Ahearn's detractors are all too willing to put their two cents in,
> thereby creating chaos.
> I don't know if Ahearn is gone for good or not.
> History suggests his neurosis will eventually force him back.
> A person could clean out their RAMP-F killfile, leaving just Ahearn in
> it and probably miss 95% of the crap is this newsgroup.


And who the berloody Hell are YOU?!?!??

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:34:49 -0400, Cuddles McGurk >
wrote:

> On 8/10/2015 11:48 PM, wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr > wrote:
> >
> >> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
> >> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
> >>
> >> ...
> >> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in
> >> life is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree
> >> to which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated
> >> into facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
> >
> > You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
> >
>
> His claim to being just one of guys is belied by his ongoing
> pontifications in which he always claims the high moral ground.

We know gtr and we don't know you or the other one. He's a good guy
and you two look like trolls who are just proving his point. Too bad
he crossposted, but that's the way the cookie crumbles.

--

sf

On 8/12/2015 2:13 AM, Troll Abuse Cooperative wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD!

Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record

ID: 47846596.

Your ass has more mass than Jupiter!

No one cares about you.

Get OUT!


_,..._
/__ \
>< `. \
/_ \ |
\-_ /:|
,--'..'. :
,' `.
_,' \
_.._,--'' , |
, ,',, _| _,.'| | |
\\||/,'(,' '--'' | | |
_ ||| | /-' |
| | (- -)<`._ | / /
| | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ /
| | / \ / -'| `--.'|
| | \___/ / /
| | H H / | |
|_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| |
|-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | |
| | | | \_ |
Barbara Llorente | | | | |
| The | |____| | |
|Troll Enabler | _..' | |____|
jrei | |_(____..._' _.' |
`-..______..-'"" (___..--'

On 8/12/2015 1:44 AM, tDs wrote:
Barbara J. Llorente FRAUD!

Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record

ID: 47846596.

Your ass has more mass than Jupiter!

No one cares about you.

Get OUT!


_,..._
/__ \
>< `. \
/_ \ |
\-_ /:|
,--'..'. :
,' `.
_,' \
_.._,--'' , |
, ,',, _| _,.'| | |
\\||/,'(,' '--'' | | |
_ ||| | /-' |
| | (- -)<`._ | / /
| | \_\O/_/`-.(<< |____/ /
| | / \ / -'| `--.'|
| | \___/ / /
| | H H / | |
|_|_..-H-H--.._ / ,| |
|-.._"_"__..-| | _-/ | |
| | | | \_ |
Barbara Llorente | | | | |
| The | |____| | |
|Troll Enabler | _..' | |____|
jrei | |_(____..._' _.' |
`-..______..-'"" (___..--'

On 8/12/2015 3:12 AM, sf wrote:

dear fat ass
good morning fat ass
how will your day go?
will you be stared at like an enourmous blob?
or be taunted and teased all day long?

people say you can't do anything
you cant do this or that
but you will sure show them
when your fat ass is in control

it is all your fault fat ass
you live to eat and dont eat to live
well look at that fat ass
a greasy cheese burger streaming down your lips and chin

you are a worthless excuse for a human
no one wants to see fat
lock yourself inside your room
until your thin and flat



you would rather some one say
**** her anorexic ass
than **** you
you fat fat ass


words hurt as much as the weight
they will be with you forever
that extra baggage you can change
show them you can do something

No one wants to see a fat girl cry
tears of grease and blubber
you will no longer be the funny fat girl
you will be just as cool as any other

slide your finger down your throat
when you dream of grease and junk
the calories will fade away
down the toilet with one flush

dont eat today
you will prove them right
that is something
you just can't do

show them they dont
have control over everything
your weight
is something you do

Loose it all fat ass
I want to see coller bones
and down right thin

dont cry when you become dizzy
just know that it will help you in the end

You can feel good about yourself fat ass
you just have to learn control
your punishment is a life full of pain
and tears of grease and fried stuff

thin is the way you have always wanted to be
well you have a long journey to get there
but change your life
you **** of blubber

run run fat ass
let that fat ass shake
no one wants to see that shit
better run in your back yard instead

skinny
be thin
fat ass
be fat
when weighing out your options
which do you like better than fat?


its not lie fat ass
you have let yourself go
its time to buckle down
and crack those calories away


when it is all said and done
you will be worthy
you will feel alive again
see thin is the way to be

and you are just a fat ass with no control again.

I killfiled this topic yesterday when it became top heavy with the same
horseshit.

But I sincerely apologize to all the participants here for my misguided
post: both in content and in cross-post.

Today in trying to debug my newsreader I opened up an abandoned
newsreader which has no killfiles. I was flabbergasted to see how much
sludge accrues here on a daily basis! Trolls may have only minimal
effect on those with dedicated newsreaders, but frankly I don't know
how any google-groups user can browse the posts here at all. It's the
worst I've seen outside a few occasions when somebody confusedly though
usenet a potential bonanza for marketing Indian movies and shoe sales.

That will hopefully be my last wasted word on this wasted topic.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:20:29 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2015-08-10 11:42 PM, Je?us wrote:
>
>> That is self-evident, but this group has too many idiots that can't
>> comprehend such an obvious concept. The whole point of the troll is to
>> seek and receive attention, how difficult is it to simply kill
>> file/ignore it instead of giving it what it wants?
>>
>
>
>It's easy enough to kill file the troll. It is just as easy to kill file
>those who reply to too many of them too often. The problem is that too
>many people reply to them too often. Even when the idiots are filtered,
>there are still relatively normal people who are incapable of ignoring
>them.

I know, I'm baffled why some seemingly intelligent people here reply
to it as though there's nothing wrong going on.

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 10:34:49 -0400, Cuddles McGurk >
wrote:

>On 8/10/2015 11:48 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 12:08:39 -0700, gtr > wrote:
>>
>>> I've noted over many years how, one by one, each usenet enclave of
>>> enthusiasts on this or that topic eventually collapses.
>>>
>>> ...
>>> What's revolting is not that there are jackasses whose only goal in
>>> life is disruption and destruction, what's nauseates most is the degree
>>> to which well-meaning and interested people are so easily manipulated
>>> into facilitating it. Every. Single. Time.
>>
>> You really do think you're superior to everyone else here. Don't you.
>>
>
>His claim to being just one of guys is belied by his ongoing
>pontifications in which he always claims the high moral ground.

'Cuddles McGurk'... hee hee

On 8/12/2015 11:18 AM, Je�us wrote:
George HW Bush is a known evil pedophile, who ran a Congressional
Blackmail Child Sex Ring during the 1980s known as €œOperation Brownstone
and Operation Brownstar€�, and later to become known as €œThe Finders or
The Franklin Coverup€�. U.S. Vice President George HW Bush would sneak
children over to Senator Barney Franks condo, known as a €œBrownstone€�
to their famous cocktail parties, where U.S. Congressman and U.S.
Senators €” some willing and some unwilling participants €” got a taste of
the €œVoodoo Drug€� in their drink.

To prove a case, you need one that was involved in an operation or a
witness or documents; in this case, U.S. Customs documents prove the
case without getting anyone still living killed. Inside the (scribd)
document below is an article that appeared in US News and World report
December 27 1993, entitled €œThrough a Glass Very Darkly€�. This includes
cops, spies and a very old investigation €” also copies of the U.S.
Customs Reports where the names are not blacked out.

On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 8:19:05 PM UTC-5, gtr wrote:
> On 2015-08-11 00:06:38 +0000, said:
>
> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:21:44 -0400, William Ahernia
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> On 8/10/2015 5:10 PM, gtr wrote:
> >>> There are assholes most everywhere. They are here because
> >>> they are engaged.
> >>
> >> Precisely why you come here.
> >> That and to pontificate how much better you are than the hoi polloi from
> >> atop your imagined high horse.
>
> Perfect example: The topic is discarded for personal attack.
>
> > We got this because you were cross posting, basic usenet good manners,
> > do not cross post.
>
> Again, my apologies, Lucretia: The response was from precisely one of
> the primary vermin that are currently destroying the
> rec.arts.movies.past-films.

If you like old movies, you should check out this Facebook page.

https://www.facebook.com/groups/1414871365486993

--Bryan

On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 10:36:12 PM UTC-5, tDs wrote:
> On 8/10/2015 6:59 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > Yet another moronic,
>
>
> Woman-stalker Wertz....
>
> >> Omelet wrote:
> >
> >> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
Tell us what it is like to try to get your face between Omelet the Behemoth's
giant buttocks. As your sister's ass expanded to gargantuan size, it
became increasingly more difficult to tickle her butthole with your tongue,
like you did when you were both children.

--Bryan

"MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 8:19:05 PM UTC-5, gtr wrote:
>> On 2015-08-11 00:06:38 +0000, said:
>>
>> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:21:44 -0400, William Ahernia
>> > > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 8/10/2015 5:10 PM, gtr wrote:
>> >>> There are assholes most everywhere. They are here because
>> >>> they are engaged.
>> >>
>> >> Precisely why you come here.
>> >> That and to pontificate how much better you are than the hoi polloi
>> >> from
>> >> atop your imagined high horse.
>>
>> Perfect example: The topic is discarded for personal attack.
>>
>> > We got this because you were cross posting, basic usenet good manners,
>> > do not cross post.
>>
>> Again, my apologies, Lucretia: The response was from precisely one of
>> the primary vermin that are currently destroying the
>> rec.arts.movies.past-films.
>
> If you like old movies, you should check out this Facebook page.
>
> https://www.facebook.com/groups/1414871365486993

Could you describe it please? I don't belong to Facebook.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Thursday, August 13, 2015 at 5:56:20 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Monday, August 10, 2015 at 8:19:05 PM UTC-5, gtr wrote:
> >> On 2015-08-11 00:06:38 +0000, said:
> >>
> >> > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 18:21:44 -0400, William Ahernia
> >> > > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 8/10/2015 5:10 PM, gtr wrote:
> >> >>> There are assholes most everywhere. They are here because
> >> >>> they are engaged.
> >> >>
> >> >> Precisely why you come here.
> >> >> That and to pontificate how much better you are than the hoi polloi
> >> >> from
> >> >> atop your imagined high horse.
> >>
> >> Perfect example: The topic is discarded for personal attack.
> >>
> >> > We got this because you were cross posting, basic usenet good manners,
> >> > do not cross post.
> >>
> >> Again, my apologies, Lucretia: The response was from precisely one of
> >> the primary vermin that are currently destroying the
> >> rec.arts.movies.past-films.
> >
> > If you like old movies, you should check out this Facebook page.
> >
> > https://www.facebook.com/groups/1414871365486993
>
> Could you describe it please? I don't belong to Facebook.
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

It is about pre-Code movies.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motion...roduction_Code

--Bryan