On 9/9/2015 12:16 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:

>
> Giving the Bodine troll sanctuary here is a very BAD thing.
>
> You know this friend, why do you let him back in?

If you want to know, my email works.

On 9/10/2015 12:54 AM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 9/9/2015 12:16 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>
>>
>> Giving the Bodine troll sanctuary here is a very BAD thing.
>>
>> You know this friend, why do you let him back in?
>
> If you want to know, my email works.
Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 9/9/2015 12:16 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>
>>
>> Giving the Bodine troll sanctuary here is a very BAD thing.
>>
>> You know this friend, why do you let him back in?
>
> If you want to know, my email works.


Why not just out with it here?

Is there some super seekrit reason that demands such privacy?

Please.

On 9/10/2015 2:10 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>> On 9/9/2015 12:16 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>>
>>>
Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On 9/10/2015 8:29 AM, Shalako wrote:
>
Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On 9/10/2015 8:29 AM, Shalako wrote:

Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On 9/10/2015 8:54 AM, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
> On 9/10/2015 8:29 AM, Shalako wrote:
>
> Mmmm hmmm...
>
> Ayup...
>
>

Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On 9/10/2015 9:47 AM, taxed and spent wrote:

> http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/oct/04/claredyer
>
> I imagine Edgar J Hoover thinks that result sucks.
>
>

Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:08:38 AM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby
wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2015 7:27 AM, wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 2:42:01 PM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/8/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
> >>
> >>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Canada, I think?
> >>>
> >> Mmmm hmmm...
> >>
> >> Ayup...
> >>
> >>
> > I did NOT say that. Not only do you need someone to read
> > you Consumer Report ratings, you need someone to read the
> > comments and who made them on this blog.
> >
>
> YES YOU DID YOU LIAR BIOTCH!
>
>
No, I didn't. Learn to read dummy.

On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:51:27 PM UTC-5, taxed and spent wrote:
>
> >>On 9/8/2015 4:54 PM, wrote:
> >
> >>> I do know Dyson fought off a hostile takeover from Hoover. Hoover
> >>> wanted to buy the company and kill the canister/bag less technology.
> >
> > If they lost a lawsuit to Dyson over bagless vacs you sure can't tell it
> > by running a search:
> > https://www.google.com/search?q=hoov...utf-8&oe=utf-8
>
> depends what search you run:
>
> Hoover taken to cleaners in £4m Dyson case
>
> http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/oct/04/claredyer
>
> I imagine Hoover thinks that result sucks.
>
>
Thanks! I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and
had won.

On 9/10/2015 3:50 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:08:38 AM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/2015 7:27 AM, wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 2:42:01 PM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/8/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Canada, I think?
>>>>>
>>>> Mmmm hmmm...
>>>>
>>>> Ayup...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I did NOT say that. Not only do you need someone to read
>>> you Consumer Report ratings, you need someone to read the
>>> comments and who made them on this blog.
>>>
>>
>> YES YOU DID YOU LIAR BIOTCH!
>>
>>
> No, I didn't. Learn to read dummy.
>
Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

On 9/10/2015 3:56 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:51:27 PM UTC-5, taxed and spent wrote:
>>
>>>> On 9/8/2015 4:54 PM, wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I do know Dyson fought off a hostile takeover from Hoover. Hoover
>>>>> wanted to buy the company and kill the canister/bag less technology.
>>>
>>> If they lost a lawsuit to Dyson over bagless vacs you sure can't tell it
>>> by running a search:
>>> https://www.google.com/search?q=hoov...utf-8&oe=utf-8
>>
>> depends what search you run:
>>
>> Hoover taken to cleaners in £4m Dyson case
>>
>> http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/oct/04/claredyer
>>
>> I imagine Hoover thinks that result sucks.
>>
>>
> Thanks! I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and
> had won.
>
Mmmm hmmm...

Ayup...

itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>
>I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and had won.

Easy to know the winner without going to court; in 1960 the high
school boys said "She sucks like a Hoover"... in 2015 the high school
boys tweet "She sucks like a Dyson". Ladies and gentlemen I rest my
case. LOL-LOL

On 9/10/2015 9:24 AM, S Viemeister wrote:
> On 9/10/2015 9:12 AM, Nancy Young wrote:

>> That's a lot of years in vacuum cleaner life expectancy. I've
>> become accustomed to having to replace them ever 3 or 4 years.
>>
> I'm still using a DC-01 Dyson, bought in late 1997/early 1998.

Fantastic.

> We had just bought the house - the previous owner was a very tidy woman,
> and she'd obviously cleaned and vacuumed before she left. When the Dyson
> arrived, I decided to try it out in the livingroom. One third of the way
> across the room, the canister was full of dog hair. I emptied it,
> continued across the room, emptied it again, and after 3 emptyings, the
> room was done.

Yikes. Then call the carpet cleaners. What a mess.

I'm glad you had great luck with your machine, and you hear all
the time how happy people are with them. I thought maybe because
I'd bought a canister that I wasn't wowed by it. I had an
experience like yours when I replaced it with a power head
vacuum. No, not three canisters of dog hair or otherwise. (laugh)
Just a lot of stuff came up.

I don't think my Dyson was performing up to snuff for a while.
And when you pay that much for a machine, you do expect to be
impressed.

> The carpet had _looked_ clean, but the previous owner had
> been a gamekeeper, and his dogs lived with them.
>
> I think I may have replaced the belt once, and of course the filters.

I did hesitate to mention that I didn't have a great experience
because I know people do love them, but I did want to say that
the refurbished machines are not there for sale just because
someone didn't know how to use it, or opened the box and returned
it. They aren't infallible.

nancy

On 2015-09-10, Nancy Young > wrote:

> And when you pay that much for a machine, you do expect to be
> impressed.

.....and are not likely to bad-mouth a product one foolishly spent so much
money on.

The proof is is the pudding. How many used Dysons does one see in a
typical used vacuum cleaner shop. I've never seen a one.

Ever since I rescued a commercial grade Hoover from a dumpster and
repaired it by replacing a then $5 beater brush belt, I've never
seen the advantage of these new gen bagless vacuums. My daughter
seems to go thru them at an astonishing rate. About 1 per yr. At one
time she had 3 dead one's and was looking for a 4th.

Me? I'm still using a Kenmore canister vac w/ pwr head. Sucker must
be at least 30 yrs old, yet I can still get parts. Also have a
working Kirby. They may not be the best for vacuuming dirt, but they
DO last. The one I have must be at least 35 yrs old and works jes
fine.

nb

On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 8:18:06 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> itsjoannotjoann wrote:
> >
> >I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and had won.
>
> Easy to know the winner without going to court; in 1960 the high
> school boys said "She sucks like a Hoover"... in 2015 the high school
> boys tweet "She sucks like a Dyson". Ladies and gentlemen I rest my
> case. LOL-LOL
>
>
Go stand in the corner until you are told to come out.

On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 9:48:27 AM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>
> I've never
> seen the advantage of these new gen bagless vacuums. My daughter
> seems to go thru them at an astonishing rate. About 1 per yr. At one
> time she had 3 dead one's and was looking for a 4th.
>
> nb
>
>
But you fail to tell what brand of bagless vacuums your daughter
seems to have bad luck/tears up. Either she's buying junk from
the get go or she's very abusive with them.

On 9/10/2015 10:48 AM, notbob wrote:
> On 2015-09-10, Nancy Young > wrote:
>
>> And when you pay that much for a machine, you do expect to be
>> impressed.
>
> ....and are not likely to bad-mouth a product one foolishly spent so much
> money on.

Yet everyone raves about them. Hey, it wasn't that much, but
probably $100 more than I generally spend.

I was rather hoping it would be more reliable for the extra
dough. That doesn't always pan out.

> The proof is is the pudding. How many used Dysons does one see in a
> typical used vacuum cleaner shop. I've never seen a one.

I really don't spend any time whatsoever in a used vacuum shop.

Just for giggles I searched and the first article to pop up was,
ta da! http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/3688983.stm

> Ever since I rescued a commercial grade Hoover from a dumpster and
> repaired it by replacing a then $5 beater brush belt, I've never
> seen the advantage of these new gen bagless vacuums. My daughter
> seems to go thru them at an astonishing rate. About 1 per yr. At one
> time she had 3 dead one's and was looking for a 4th.

That could well be true, I hate the bags so much I guess I'm
willing to shell out for a new machine every two three years.

Knock wood this one is still going strong. It's been my favorite
so far.

> Me? I'm still using a Kenmore canister vac w/ pwr head. Sucker must
> be at least 30 yrs old, yet I can still get parts. Also have a
> working Kirby.

Now, from what I've heard, the price of those makes my little
Dyson look cheap.

> They may not be the best for vacuuming dirt, but they
> DO last. The one I have must be at least 35 yrs old and works jes
> fine.

Except for that Not best for vacuuming dirt part.

nancy

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:20:30 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 8:18:06 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>> itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>> >
>> >I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and had won.
>>
>> Easy to know the winner without going to court; in 1960 the high
>> school boys said "She sucks like a Hoover"... in 2015 the high school
>> boys tweet "She sucks like a Dyson". Ladies and gentlemen I rest my
>> case. LOL-LOL
>>
>>
>Go stand in the corner until you are told to come.

I always oblige a lady.

On 9/9/2015 11:50 PM, wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:08:38 AM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/2015 7:27 AM, wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 2:42:01 PM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/8/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Canada, I think?
>>>>>
>>>> Mmmm hmmm...
>>>>
>>>> Ayup...
>>>>
>>>>
>>> I did NOT say that. Not only do you need someone to read
>>> you Consumer Report ratings, you need someone to read the
>>> comments and who made them on this blog.
>>>
>>
>> YES YOU DID YOU LIAR BIOTCH!
>>
>>
> No, I didn't. Learn to read dummy.
>


Sorry, you really did.

On 9/10/2015 11:20 AM, wrote:
> On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 8:18:06 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>> itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>>>
>>> I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and had won.
>>
>> Easy to know the winner without going to court; in 1960 the high
>> school boys said "She sucks like a Hoover"... in 2015 the high school
>> boys tweet "She sucks like a Dyson". Ladies and gentlemen I rest my
>> case. LOL-LOL
>>
>>
> Go stand in the corner until you are told to come out.
>
Make him eat a bar of soap while you're at it.

Jill

On 9/10/2015 11:21 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/10/2015 11:20 AM, wrote:
>> On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 8:18:06 AM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>> itsjoannotjoann wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I thought Dyson had been to court with Hoover and had won.
>>>
>>> Easy to know the winner without going to court; in 1960 the high
>>> school boys said "She sucks like a Hoover"... in 2015 the high school
>>> boys tweet "She sucks like a Dyson". Ladies and gentlemen I rest my
>>> case. LOL-LOL
>>>
>>>
>> Go stand in the corner until you are told to come out.
>>
> Make him eat a bar of soap while you're at it.
>
> Jill

Kinky!

Now that Julie isn't posting as much you can work over Shelly!

On 9/10/2015 10:29 AM, Nancy Young wrote:

> I'm glad you had great luck with your machine, and you hear all
> the time how happy people are with them. I thought maybe because
> I'd bought a canister that I wasn't wowed by it. I had an
> experience like yours when I replaced it with a power head
> vacuum. No, not three canisters of dog hair or otherwise. (laugh)
> Just a lot of stuff came up.
>
Mine is an upright, not a canister. If I were to buy a canister, it
would definitely need to be one with a powered head.

On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 5:58:07 AM UTC-10, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
> wrote:
> >> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Malaysia, I think?
> >
> > Just reminded me that I was going to check mine out ~ both the stick
> > and the canister ones are made in Malaysia - tiny, tiny print, had to
> > get my glasses to make it out! That said, I wouldn't send either
> > back they are the best in their type I have ever had, costly too
>
>
> Dyson's are crap.
>
> Read Consumer Reports.
>
> Only worse ranking for a majpr manufacturer is Oreck.

Dyson is the Starbucks of the vac world. The genius of these companies is that they've made their products golden tickets into an exclusive world of discriminating consumers. Simply buy the vac or a cup and you too can be in the club. Never before has status, respect, and envy been so easy to procure.

As a bonus, there's none of the responsibilities and duties that a lot of clubs require from their members. The club I'm in requires that I be president in the coming months. I will reluctantly lead these guys but I simply won't be wearing the club vests. I mean, a guy's got to draw the line somewhere.

As far as the vacuum cleaner business goes, my understanding is that it pretty much sucks - but it's picking up.

On 9/10/2015 1:45 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 5:58:07 AM UTC-10, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Malaysia, I think?
>>>
>>> Just reminded me that I was going to check mine out ~ both the stick
>>> and the canister ones are made in Malaysia - tiny, tiny print, had to
>>> get my glasses to make it out! That said, I wouldn't send either
>>> back they are the best in their type I have ever had, costly too
>>
>>
>> Dyson's are crap.
>>
>> Read Consumer Reports.
>>
>> Only worse ranking for a majpr manufacturer is Oreck.
>
> Dyson is the Starbucks of the vac world.

Great analogy.

> The genius of these companies is that they've made their products golden tickets into an exclusive world of discriminating consumers. Simply buy the vac or a cup and you too can be in the club. Never before has status, respect, and envy been so easy to procure.

It's like a Bentley we can all afford!

> As a bonus, there's none of the responsibilities and duties that a lot of clubs require from their members. The club I'm in requires that I be president in the coming months. I will reluctantly lead these guys but I simply won't be wearing the club vests. I mean, a guy's got to draw the line somewhere.


Ooooh, no vest?!!

man, you like to shake things up, doncha?

;-)

> As far as the vacuum cleaner business goes, my understanding is that it pretty much sucks - but it's picking up.

Ba Rump!

On 10/09/2015 12:47 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:

> Upright and handvac have been in the house over 5 years. Never a
> problem.
>
> Stick is only 2 yrs old. No problems with that, either.
>
> All three are used daily, as I have birds who like to splatter seed
> all over the place.
>

Is one of them called Onan?:-)
Graham

On 10/09/2015 1:06 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:

>
> The 3 vacs I have? The upright, because it comes with a full set of
> tools and in a pinch can fill in for the others, but the stick and the
> handvac are cordless and that is convenient for stairs, kitchen floor,
> ceiling fans, other tight places that an upright or tubes and hoses
> cannot easily reach. Still, the upright has the most power and is by
> far the best for straight carpet work.
>
I have a built in system with a 2hp motor and canister in the basement.
I want to get a decent hand vac for those small spills when it's too
much trouble to drag out the 30' hose. I looked at the Dyson stickvac
and it struck me that it is a handvac with an extension tube. Could one
also use the stickvac without the tube as a handvac?
Graham

On 9/10/2015 2:07 PM, graham wrote:
> On 10/09/2015 1:06 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>
>>
>> The 3 vacs I have? The upright, because it comes with a full set of
>> tools and in a pinch can fill in for the others, but the stick and the
>> handvac are cordless and that is convenient for stairs, kitchen floor,
>> ceiling fans, other tight places that an upright or tubes and hoses
>> cannot easily reach. Still, the upright has the most power and is by
>> far the best for straight carpet work.
>>
> I have a built in system with a 2hp motor and canister in the basement.
> I want to get a decent hand vac for those small spills when it's too
> much trouble to drag out the 30' hose. I looked at the Dyson stickvac
> and it struck me that it is a handvac with an extension tube. Could one
> also use the stickvac without the tube as a handvac?
> Graham


Come on, you know you really want a Kirby!

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:02:19 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 10/09/2015 12:47 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>
>> Upright and handvac have been in the house over 5 years. Never a
>> problem.
>>
>> Stick is only 2 yrs old. No problems with that, either.
>>
>> All three are used daily, as I have birds who like to splatter seed
>> all over the place.
>>
>
>Is one of them called Onan?:-)
>Graham

My birds are devout atheists.

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 14:07:07 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 10/09/2015 1:06 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>
>>
>> The 3 vacs I have? The upright, because it comes with a full set of
>> tools and in a pinch can fill in for the others, but the stick and the
>> handvac are cordless and that is convenient for stairs, kitchen floor,
>> ceiling fans, other tight places that an upright or tubes and hoses
>> cannot easily reach. Still, the upright has the most power and is by
>> far the best for straight carpet work.
>>
>I have a built in system with a 2hp motor and canister in the basement.
>I want to get a decent hand vac for those small spills when it's too
>much trouble to drag out the 30' hose. I looked at the Dyson stickvac
>and it struck me that it is a handvac with an extension tube. Could one
>also use the stickvac without the tube as a handvac?
>Graham


I think one can get the stick with attachments. Not sure, as I use the
small one I already have, but you are correct - the motor heads are
the same.

On 9/10/2015 2:15 PM, Boron Elgar wrote:
>>> All three are used daily, as I have birds who like to splatter seed
>>> >>all over the place.
>>> >>
>> >
>> >Is one of them called Onan?:-)
>> >Graham
> My birds are devout atheists.

Iow, pigeons...

On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 12:20:37 PM UTC-5, Kokopelli wrote:
>
> On 9/9/2015 11:50 PM, wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:08:38 AM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 9/9/2015 7:27 AM, wrote:
>
> >>> On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 2:42:01 PM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 9/8/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Canada, I think?
> >>>>>
> >>>> Mmmm hmmm...
> >>>>
> >>>> Ayup...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I did NOT say that. Not only do you need someone to read
> >>> you Consumer Report ratings, you need someone to read the
> >>> comments and who made them on this blog.
> >>>
> >>
> >> YES YOU DID YOU LIAR BIOTCH!
> >>
> >>
> > No, I didn't. Learn to read dummy.
> >
>
>
> Sorry, you really did.
>
>
No dummy, I said and I quote:
>
> On 07/09/2015 7:48 PM, wrote:
>
> > And Dyson's corporate offices are in Malaysia, I think?
> >
I never said anything about Dyson's being made in Canada. I
have no idea that Dyson even has offices in Canada. Go back
the first of the week and read what I said and not a quote
you twisted around to suit your purposes.

On 9/10/2015 10:25 PM, wrote:
> On Thursday, September 10, 2015 at 12:20:37 PM UTC-5, Kokopelli wrote:
>>
>> On 9/9/2015 11:50 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:08:38 AM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 9/9/2015 7:27 AM, wrote:
>>
>>>>> On Tuesday, September 8, 2015 at 2:42:01 PM UTC-5, Arthur Rochford Manby wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 9/8/2015 11:48 AM, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Canada, I think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mmmm hmmm...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ayup...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> I did NOT say that. Not only do you need someone to read
>>>>> you Consumer Report ratings, you need someone to read the
>>>>> comments and who made them on this blog.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> YES YOU DID YOU LIAR BIOTCH!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> No, I didn't. Learn to read dummy.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry, you really did.
>>
>>
> No dummy, I said and I quote:
>>
>> On 07/09/2015 7:48 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> And Dyson's corporate offices are in Malaysia, I think?
>>>
> I never said anything about Dyson's being made in Canada. I
> have no idea that Dyson even has offices in Canada. Go back
> the first of the week and read what I said and not a quote
> you twisted around to suit your purposes.
>


I have no purposes other than disabusing the feeble-minded of buying bad
vacuums.

Cope.

On 9/11/2015 12:09 AM, graham wrote:


I have, on at least three prior occasions, written posts that delve into
the €œalleged€� lurid past of one of our former presidents, George Herbert
Walker Bush (GHWB), the current but ailing patriarch of the Bush Family
Dynasty €“ I refer to them as the Bush Family Crime Syndicate, certainly
not in terms of endearment €“ but rather more like the Mafia Godfather
who prepares his sons to take over the family business upon his death.
This particular post references an article by Stew Webb, a contributor
of Veterans Today.

In his life-time, George H. W. Bush (GHWB) has controlled every
clandestine (hidden from view) and secret organization/operation within
the arsenal of the United States government as either 1) Director of the
CIA, 2) Vice President to Ronald Reagan (who was an unwitting puppet to
the Bush controlled cabal €“ GHWB secretly gave Reagan poisons that
hastened his fall into Alzheimers Disease and evidence suggests he
helped plan Reagan attempted assassination by John Hinckley, whose
family were close friends of the Bush family €“ a coincidence?) and 3)
ultimately as President of the United States before Bill Clinton took
office.

Barbara J Llorente 71 Cerritos Ave San Francisco, CA 94127.
Age 65 (Born 1950) (415) 239-7248. Background Check - Available. Record

ID: 47846596.