On 9/16/2015 10:54 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 3:52:58 PM UTC-4, Sqwertz wrote:
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> I've made many mistakes in my life. Why should the prospect of
>>> this one be intimidating?
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> United States, Wisconsin, Madison
>> On Oldfield Rd, yes?
>
> No. Not even close.
>
> Another Cindy Hamilton
>

Well that was fairly creepy.

La Llorona wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> > On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org
> > > because all spammers come from there but the 'whatever' persons
> > > are also pretending there to come from valid addresses.
> > >
> > > What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue who
> > > actually needs help.
> > >
> > > To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on, then
> > > go away.
> >
> > Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including the
> > full headers of the post:
> >
> > ";
> >
> > It might have some effect.
>
> Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul you
> would not be such a loser.

Free speach does not mean to allow speaking for another with their name
(in our case that would be display name and email address).

Free speach has full reign here and always has had. That also means
you can NOT tell ANOTHER what they can and can not say. end trans.

Carol

--

La Llorona wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > wrote:
> > > On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> > > > On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > >
> > > > > Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all aioe.org
> > > > > because all spammers come from there but the 'whatever'
> > > > > persons are also pretending there to come from valid
> > > > > addresses.
> > > > >
> > > > > What we have is a person with a serious mental health issue
> > > > > who actually needs help.
> > > > >
> > > > > To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that on,
> > > > > then go away.
> > > >
> > > > Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address, including
> > > > the full headers of the post:
> > > >
> >>> ";
> > > >
> > > > It might have some effect.
> > >
> > > Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your soul
> > > you would not be such a loser.
> >
> > The American ideal of free speech pertains to government restriction
> > on speech.
>
> No.
>
> It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect ALL
> free speech at the ultimate firewall level.
>
> Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to endorse
> crass censorship.
>
> > It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> > that comes out of your piehole.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> No one said you had to, did they?
>
> Well?????
>
> You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all of
> my posts if you wish.
>
> But do NOT attempt to censor me.
>
> That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
>
> Capisce?

LOL! the only MASSIVE mistake is reading you.

--

La Llorona wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 9/16/2015 1:17 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 2:54:07 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > wrote:
> > > On 9/16/2015 4:21 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 9:16:01 PM UTC-4, La Llorona
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > On 9/15/2015 6:56 PM, gtr wrote:
> > > > > > On 2015-09-15 23:26:29 +0000, cshenk said:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi folks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Be careful who you 'ban'. I am thinking to ban all
> > > > > > > aioe.org because all spammers come from there but the
> > > > > > > 'whatever' persons are also pretending there to come from
> > > > > > > valid addresses.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What we have is a person with a serious mental health
> > > > > > > issue who actually needs help.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > To trap it out, we need headers. If you can't turn that
> > > > > > > on, then go away.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Perhaps if 30 or 40 of us complained to this address,
> > > > > > including the full headers of the post:
> > > > > >
> >>>>> ";
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It might have some effect.
> > > > >
> > > > > Perhaps if you had the American ideal of free speech in your
> > > > > soul you would not be such a loser.
> > > >
> > > > The American ideal of free speech pertains to government
> > > > restriction on speech.
> > >
> > > No.
> > >
> > > It is proscribed in that manner as a legal mechanism to protect
> > > ALL free speech at the ultimate firewall level.
> > >
> > > Do NOT think you can use some grotesquely narrow precept to
> > > endorse crass censorship.
> > >
> > > > It doesn't mean that we have to listen to everything
> > > > that comes out of your piehole.
> > > >
> > > > Cindy Hamilton
> > >
> > > No one said you had to, did they?
> >
> > Of course not. And you are not required to listen to what
> > comes out of my piehole.
>
> But I choose to because the insights are often quite sound.
>
> > > Well?????
> > >
> > > You have a mouse and a mind, feel free to pass by any and or all
> > > of my posts if you wish.
> > >
> > > But do NOT attempt to censor me.
> >
> > I don't have the power to censor you, but your ISP certainly does.
>
> If you're threatening my ability to maintain my chosen ISP and
> consequently my work connectivity you are making a HUGE mistake.
>
> > > That would be a MASSIVE mistake.
> > >
> > > Capisce?
> >
> > I've made many mistakes in my life.
>
> And you wish to make more?
>
> > Why should the prospect of
> > this one be intimidating?
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> Immediate and withering legal action.
>
> Want some?
>
> Bring it.

Oh please, quit being a CHILD. Try and sue me. Just try it.

--

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 at 6:13:34 PM UTC-4, Dave Smith wrote:

> Freedom of speech? There are a number of Canadian produced TV shows that
> have been picked up by American networks but they are heavily censored.
> One show in particular is The Trailer Park Boys. When it is aired by a
> Canadian broadcaster it is rife with F bombs, but when it is aired by an
> American broadcaster it is beep..... beep.... beep.

Somehow I doubt that the artistic integrity of The Trailer Park Boys
is compromised by bleeping out the word "****". I see you censored
yourself; you also appear to consider the word unfit in some contexts.

Cindy Hamilton

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:34:36 -0300, wrote:

<snip>

>Lol they all come from this part of the country and although the show
>is not one I care to watch there's no denying it's hugely successful.
>One of them plays bridge at our club and in person he is different to
>his part on the show

One would hope so