On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 08:14:39 -0300, wrote:

>On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 13:55:13 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 22:07:48 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 13:40:42 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>>*** people have never married people of the opposite sex?
>>>
>>>My faggot brother did, and produced a son whose head is all f'ed up...
>>>I feel sorry for that kid but nothing I can do... his mother became a
>>>mental case too... but my faggot brother acts like he's some kind of
>>>saint going from faggot to faggot, the POS. As far as I'm concerned
>>>Queer is a serious psychiatric disease... they need to be sterilized,
>>>institutionalized, and kept far away from normal folks, like in a
>>>leper colony. Queers are sicko dangerous scum... and these psychotics
>>>want to adopt children... there is no way a faggot can raise a child
>>>normally, not possible. There's less chance a faggot won't sexually
>>>abuse a little boy than a crackhead can keep from getting high...
>>>Queer and dope fiend are both addictions[period]
>>
>>Wouldn't be a ******* if somebody took the time to repost this post of
>>yours to some of the more militant *** forums, along with your full
>>name and address?
>
>Do you not think perhaps he is the person who he says is his
>'brother'?

Oh yeah, if you mean he's basically a repressed homosexual?
Good odds on that. Either that, or he's experienced sexual abuse from
another male in childhood. *Somethings* going on there, anyway.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:37:41 -0400, Gary > wrote:

wrote:
>>
>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>> >He's even honest about preferring ferrets to women.
>>
>> That wasn't what he said, he said at this time, without a woman in his
>> life, he is happy with Mia. That's entirely different.
>
>Mia is old and special care now. She needs me and she takes up much of
>my time. We have a long history together. I will give all that she
>wants and needs until the end. She wants to sleep right next to me now
>and I happily give her that. I have to hand feed her too several times
>a day. Pain in the ass sometimes for me but....no problem here. She
>depends on my attention, companionship, and care and she WILL get it
>all. She has me wrapped around her little paw. heheh
>
>Her last days will be good ones to my best ability. :-D
>
>Wouldn't you all do the same for your elderly parents? Mia is family
>too. She's just as important as any human to me. Family is
>family....no matter what species.

Pets are more important than people who you may see now and again and
maybe never... pets are with you 24/7 from beginning to end... much
more important than shithead relatives. That pets are more important
than relatives is a no brainer.

On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 09:36:37 -0600, Embudo > wrote:

>On 10/11/2015 8:48 AM, wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Oct 2015 10:37:41 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>>>> He's even honest about preferring ferrets to women.
>>>>
>>>> That wasn't what he said, he said at this time, without a woman in his
>>>> life, he is happy with Mia. That's entirely different.
>>>
>>> Mia is old and special care now. She needs me and she takes up much of
>>> my time. We have a long history together. I will give all that she
>>> wants and needs until the end. She wants to sleep right next to me now
>>> and I happily give her that. I have to hand feed her too several times
>>> a day. Pain in the ass sometimes for me but....no problem here. She
>>> depends on my attention, companionship, and care and she WILL get it
>>> all. She has me wrapped around her little paw. heheh
>>>
>>> Her last days will be good ones to my best ability. :-D
>>>
>>> Wouldn't you all do the same for your elderly parents? Mia is family
>>> too. She's just as important as any human to me. Family is
>>> family....no matter what species.
>>
>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>> could show a little affection, but no.
>>
>
>The predicate "dumped on" says it all.
>
>That cat knows you hate it, and so it hates you.
>
>Perfect symmetry there, you worthless bitch!@

Couldn't be more precise.

On 10/11/2015 7:28 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Pets are more important than people who you may see now and again


Revealing insight...

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message

> Pets are more important than people who you may see now and again and
> maybe never... pets are with you 24/7 from beginning to end... much
> more important than shithead relatives. That pets are more important
> than relatives is a no brainer.

Totally disagree, but I would imagine in your case that your relatives leave
you alone a lot.

Cheri

On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 1:28:41 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote:
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >>
> >> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>>
> >>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> >>> ...
> >>>
> >>>> Oh dear ... I have never heard of Duggars and as for Kardashians, I see
> >>>> them referred to sometimes in the on line newspapers I read, but I know
> >>>> nothing about them and couldn't point one out. It sounds like it is a
> >>>> Very Good Thing <g>
> >>>
> >>> I've heard of them, but never once watched a show about them and
> >>> wouldn't know them if I passed them on the street...of course they
> >>> wouldn't know me either. LOL
> >>
> >> Oh! They have shows?? Ok I didn't know that. Phew seems like I had a
> >> lucky escape <g>
> >
> > Yes, they come under the category of being famous for being famous and
> > nothing else.
>
> Oh dear. How did they manage to get into such a situation? Are they
> somehow, special??

Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on shallow
things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold" watch it.

19 Kids and Counting (the Duggars) was a show about a large, fundamentalist
family who are part of the "let's out-breed the atheists" movement.

Cindy Hamilton

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, October 11, 2015 at 1:28:41 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote:
>> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> >
>> > "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Cheri" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>>
>> >>> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> >>> ...
>> >>>
>> >>>> Oh dear ... I have never heard of Duggars and as for Kardashians, I
>> >>>> see
>> >>>> them referred to sometimes in the on line newspapers I read, but I
>> >>>> know
>> >>>> nothing about them and couldn't point one out. It sounds like it is
>> >>>> a
>> >>>> Very Good Thing <g>
>> >>>
>> >>> I've heard of them, but never once watched a show about them and
>> >>> wouldn't know them if I passed them on the street...of course they
>> >>> wouldn't know me either. LOL
>> >>
>> >> Oh! They have shows?? Ok I didn't know that. Phew seems like I had a
>> >> lucky escape <g>
>> >
>> > Yes, they come under the category of being famous for being famous and
>> > nothing else.
>>
>> Oh dear. How did they manage to get into such a situation? Are they
>> somehow, special??
>
> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on shallow
> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold" watch
> it.
>
> 19 Kids and Counting (the Duggars) was a show about a large,
> fundamentalist
> family who are part of the "let's out-breed the atheists" movement.

Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing

Thanks for that.


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 10/12/2015 7:15 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote

>> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
>> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on
>> shallow
>> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold"
>> watch it.

> Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing

FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.

nancy

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 10/12/2015 7:15 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote
>
>>> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
>>> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on
>>> shallow
>>> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold"
>>> watch it.
>
>> Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing
>
> FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
> Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
> and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.

I see .... <g> they had a head start eh?

Thank you))

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 8:37:18 AM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 7:15 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> >
> >
> > "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote
>
> >> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
> >> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on
> >> shallow
> >> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold"
> >> watch it.
>
> > Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing
>
> FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
> Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
> and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.
>
> nancy

Yes, I tend to forget that, since I don't follow the "paparazzi news".
(Although it would be nearly impossible to be unaware of Caitlyn Jenner
without abandoning the news altogether.)

Cindy Hamilton

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 8:37:18 AM UTC-4, Nancy Young wrote:
>> On 10/12/2015 7:15 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote
>>
>> >> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
>> >> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on
>> >> shallow
>> >> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold"
>> >> watch it.
>>
>> > Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing
>>
>> FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
>> Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
>> and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.
>>
>> nancy
>
> Yes, I tend to forget that, since I don't follow the "paparazzi news".
> (Although it would be nearly impossible to be unaware of Caitlyn Jenner
> without abandoning the news altogether.)

I wouldn't have know anything about Caitlyn Jenner if I hadn't read about it
here.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 10/12/2015 4:38 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> 19 Kids and Counting (the Duggars) was a show about a large, fundamentalist
> family who are part of the "let's out-breed the atheists" movement.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Looks like they did too.

On 2015-10-12 8:37 AM, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 7:15 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote
>
>>> Specially exhibitionistic. "Keeping up with the Kardashians" is/was
>>> a "reality" television show about shallow people spending money on
>>> shallow
>>> things. People who are interested in "glitter" rather than "gold"
>>> watch it.
>
>> Good grief! What a waste of space! I guess I have missed nothing
>
> FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
> Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
> and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.
>
>


Poor Bruce. Look what he to go through to garner some attention.

On 10/12/2015 7:54 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> FYI, the Kardashian family has two famous fathers, the late
>> Robert Kardashian who was a member of OJ Simpson's Dream Team,
>> and Bruce Jenner, who is now Caitlyn Jenner.
>>
>>
>
>
> Poor Bruce. Look what he to go through to garner some attention.


Makes you wonder if Sqwerty will be next...

Janet wrote:
>
> Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
> We all know you're a *** ferret.

Not ***. Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
Park when we visited the UK many years ago.

http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg

She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
her, think of her, and love her every single day, so I have no need
for a new girlfriend other than the little furry one that is sleeping
on my bed as we speak.

Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.

:-O

wrote:
>
> Gary wrote:
> >I do know 2 *** men couples. Nice people. I'm fine with them. I don't
> >care about their sexual preferences. Only one flauts his gayness with
> >the odd *** talk. For some reason, HE feels the need to let everyone
> >he meets know that he's ***. The other 3 don't act in that odd manner.
>
> Well we all vary in style, straight or *** One *** friend is
> normal for all of the year until the *** Pride celebration, then he's
> the one on a float with tight, black leather pants with the cheeks cut
> out on his bum.

This is the annoying *** ****nut that should be shot twice in the face
and buried in a shallow grave in some random cornfield. What a
jackass. Right, Bryan? Are you with me here?

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Janet wrote:
>>
>> Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
>> We all know you're a *** ferret.
>
> Not ***. Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>
> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg
>
> She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
> her, think of her, and love her every single day, so I have no need
> for a new girlfriend other than the little furry one that is sleeping
> on my bed as we speak.
>
> Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
> relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
> from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.

I am sorry you feel that way BUT, life just might surprise you. I hope
so


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

wrote:
>
> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
> could show a little affection, but no.

Cats don't like to show affection much but know that she loves you to
death. I'll bet she lays nearby in your room. Cats like to take
control of the household but we know better.

On 10/12/2015 10:17 AM, Gary wrote:
> Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
> relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
> from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.
>
> :-O

Gary, just make Mia as comfortable as possible. I know you will.

I thought the same thing about not adopting another cat after Persia
died. I was sure I didn't want another cat. Then the owner of a couple
of cats died and Buffy needed a home. A home where she wasn't being
bullied by the other resident cat, Frankie. The poor thing had to hide
all the time.

So I adopted Buffy. I'm sure glad I did. She's a real sweetheart.
She's also very happy being an only cat. (Some people think all cats
need companions. Nope, some cats really don't want a companion. Persia
was the same way. No other cats!)

Yes, there is always pain and loss when beloved pets die. We grieve.
But giving another one a chance for a happy home... I'm glad I rethought
that.

Jill

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> Pets are more important than people who you may see now and again and
> maybe never... pets are with you 24/7 from beginning to end... much
> more important than shithead relatives. That pets are more important
> than relatives is a no brainer.

Others here disagree with you Sheldon but I DO agree. The darn pets
are with you 24/7. They never ask more from you than food, care and
love. They love you unconditionally with no issues. They are loyal to
the end.

My ferret trumphs any human at this point in my life. Even daughter
ignores me but she is very busy so I don't hold that against her.
Ferret is here constantly and so very cool.

Ophelia wrote:
>
> I wouldn't have know anything about Caitlyn Jenner if I hadn't read about it
> here.

Bruce Jenner is nothing more than a carnival side-show. You're better
off not knowing anything about HIM. It's only gone on tv to generate
money for him. Lazy ass should just get a real job instead of becoming
the most horrific "woman" ever. Creepy people attract tv producers.

On 10/12/2015 10:52 AM, Gary wrote:
> wrote:
>>
>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>> could show a little affection, but no.
>
Maybe she perceived she was "dumped" and not much wanted? I don't know.

> Cats don't like to show affection much

Gary, you cannot make a blanket statement about cats. Some cats may not
show affection. Stand-offish is often the word used. I'm sorry
lucretia has a cat that doesn't care but...

My cat Persia barged into my house, said I'm going to live with you and
I'm going to sleep with you. I'll snuggle against you and purr. I'll
be very cute and loving. All you have to do is feed me and take care of
me. Oh, and a few toys wouldn't hurt.

Buffy is the same way. Very affectionate. She rolls around and wants
her tummy rubbed. That's a very vulnerable position for a cat to take.
She trusts me. I even think she might even love me.

I know I love her.

Jill

In article >, says...
>
> Janet wrote:
> >
> > Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
> > We all know you're a *** ferret.
>
> Not ***


Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>
> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg

My, what lovely hair she's got :-)

Whatever is that ferretmobile?
>
> She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
> her, think of her, and love her every single day, so I have no need
> for a new girlfriend other than the little furry one that is sleeping
> on my bed as we speak.
>
> Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
> relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
> from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.
>
> :-O

Sorry to hear that.

Janet UK

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Janet wrote:
>>
>> Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
>> We all know you're a *** ferret.
>
> Not ***. Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>
> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg
>
> She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
> her, think of her, and love her every single day, so I have no need
> for a new girlfriend other than the little furry one that is sleeping
> on my bed as we speak.
>
> Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
> relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
> from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.
>
> :-O

LOL on the pic, and as far as the NO new relationships with pets, I'm with
you there. :-(

Cheri

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> wrote:
>>
>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>> could show a little affection, but no.
>
> Cats don't like to show affection much but know that she loves you to
> death. I'll bet she lays nearby in your room. Cats like to take
> control of the household but we know better.

Although she says her cat was 'dumped on her', that cat would have been
destroyed with her kind intervention. So those who sneer that she has a
cat that was 'dumped' on her needs to think on that. She has cared for this
'dumped' cat, fed it and cared for it when she didn't have to do that. That
she receives no affection in return says even more about her. She does it
regardless.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Janet wrote:
>>>
>>> Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
>>> We all know you're a *** ferret.
>>
>> Not ***. Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
>> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>>
>> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg
>>
>> She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
>> her, think of her, and love her every single day, so I have no need
>> for a new girlfriend other than the little furry one that is sleeping
>> on my bed as we speak.
>>
>> Mia is not too long for this world either. I will start NO new
>> relationships...I'm so tired of the constant losses. All of the pain
>> from each haunts you forever. I'm so over the heartbreak.
>>
>> :-O
>
> LOL on the pic, and as far as the NO new relationships with pets, I'm with
> you there. :-(

After my lovely Blue died it took more than a year to get myself back to the
rescue centre. There are so many lovely dogs that are desperate for loving
homes and then after we lost Bonnie I was determined not to wait so long
again. We went and looked at dogs, but none of them were my lovely
Bonnie It was just too soon. Anyway I looked on the website and saw our
Poppy. She was such a lost wee soul. Skin and bone with no hair on her back.
She has her problems as you know, but I don't regret taking her. She is so
affectionate now and she is coming on well. At least we can look forward to
having her for a good number of years.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Janet wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> Janet wrote:
>> >
>> > Relax, Gary, it's no secret who you sleep with.
>> > We all know you're a *** ferret.
>>
>> Not ***
>
>
> Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
>> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>>
>> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg
>
> My, what lovely hair she's got :-)

she looks like a biter

Gary ... you wild beast!

Gary wrote:
> Not ***. Here's a pic of me and my last human(?) girlfriend at Worden
> Park when we visited the UK many years ago.
>
> http://i61.tinypic.com/fc1krb.jpg
>
> She was the love of my life but she died way too young. I still miss
> her, think of her, and love her every single day,


A sad loss as all such loses are.

I'm sorry to say however you may have a lawsuit against KIA for ripping
you off for their Soul commercials.

On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 9:43:50 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> wrote:
> >
> > Gary wrote:
> > >I do know 2 *** men couples. Nice people. I'm fine with them. I don't
> > >care about their sexual preferences. Only one flauts his gayness with
> > >the odd *** talk. For some reason, HE feels the need to let everyone
> > >he meets know that he's ***. The other 3 don't act in that odd manner.
> >
> > Well we all vary in style, straight or *** One *** friend is
> > normal for all of the year until the *** Pride celebration, then he's
> > the one on a float with tight, black leather pants with the cheeks cut
> > out on his bum.
>
> This is the annoying *** ****nut that should be shot twice in the face
> and buried in a shallow grave in some random cornfield. What a
> jackass. Right, Bryan? Are you with me here?

Dude, I marched in the St. Louis Pride this year, in a group that was well
over 50% hetero.

It's true that I'd make a lousy *** guy. Not only do I find the idea of
putting my mouth on another man revolting, but I strongly dislike Streisand
and Broadway musicals. As far as over-the-top campiness goes, I find it
ridiculous, but no more or no less as absurd as sports fans waving towels
or foam hands with the index finger sticking out.

This:
http://isabelrose.com/wp-content/upl...ning-image.jpg
is no more or less ridiculous than this:
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3289/...13c0c229df.jpg

If you don't think so, you're probably either a nutso sports fan or a major
prude.

--Bryan

Gary wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> I wouldn't have know anything about Caitlyn Jenner if I hadn't read about it
>> here.
>
> Bruce Jenner is nothing more than a carnival side-show. You're better
> off not knowing anything about HIM. It's only gone on tv to generate
> money for him. Lazy ass should just get a real job instead of becoming
> the most horrific "woman" ever. Creepy people attract tv producers.
>
+1

Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:45:32 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>> I do know 2 *** men couples. Nice people. I'm fine with them. I don't
>>>> care about their sexual preferences. Only one flauts his gayness with
>>>> the odd *** talk. For some reason, HE feels the need to let everyone
>>>> he meets know that he's ***. The other 3 don't act in that odd manner.
>>>
>>> Well we all vary in style, straight or *** One *** friend is
>>> normal for all of the year until the *** Pride celebration, then he's
>>> the one on a float with tight, black leather pants with the cheeks cut
>>> out on his bum.
>>
>> This is the annoying *** ****nut that should be shot twice in the face
>> and buried in a shallow grave in some random cornfield. What a
>> jackass. Right, Bryan? Are you with me here?
>
> Another closet psychopath.
>

You simperng slackwit, it was obviously posted as satire.

Damn, you're a dolt.

MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> Dude, I marched in the St. Louis Pride this year, in a group that was well
> over 50% hetero.

Why?

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:52:08 -0400, Gary > wrote:

wrote:
>>
>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>> could show a little affection, but no.
>
>Cats don't like to show affection much but know that she loves you to
>death. I'll bet she lays nearby in your room. Cats like to take
>control of the household but we know better.

They show it in their own way, in their own time.

My two girls are very affectionate to me (in fact I don't get much
'screen time' when in front of this computer). Any visitors would
never get that impression from them, since they either go elsewhere or
sit in the background when other people are here. People leave... the
girls want to interact all the time and give smooches.

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:35:23 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 10/12/2015 10:52 AM, Gary wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>>> could show a little affection, but no.
>>
>Maybe she perceived she was "dumped" and not much wanted? I don't know.

"dumped cat"... some sort of Asian slow cooking?


>> Cats don't like to show affection much
>
>Gary, you cannot make a blanket statement about cats. Some cats may not
>show affection. Stand-offish is often the word used. I'm sorry
>lucretia has a cat that doesn't care but...

I once heard a great saying about cats and dogs:

Cats have Aspergers
Dogs have ADD

So very accurate and true IMO
Cats behaviour reminds me so much of autism/Aspergers, such as the
'Stand-offish' behaviour you mention. Dogs certainly have ADD... I
know mine does

>My cat Persia barged into my house, said I'm going to live with you and
>I'm going to sleep with you. I'll snuggle against you and purr. I'll
>be very cute and loving. All you have to do is feed me and take care of
>me. Oh, and a few toys wouldn't hurt.
>
>Buffy is the same way. Very affectionate. She rolls around and wants
>her tummy rubbed. That's a very vulnerable position for a cat to take.
> She trusts me. I even think she might even love me.
>
>I know I love her.

Aww. She loves you lots.

On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 11:18:08 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>> Pets are more important than people who you may see now and again and
>> maybe never... pets are with you 24/7 from beginning to end... much
>> more important than shithead relatives. That pets are more important
>> than relatives is a no brainer.
>
>Others here disagree with you Sheldon but I DO agree. The darn pets
>are with you 24/7. They never ask more from you than food, care and
>love. They love you unconditionally with no issues. They are loyal to
>the end.
>
>My ferret trumphs any human at this point in my life. Even daughter
>ignores me but she is very busy so I don't hold that against her.
>Ferret is here constantly and so very cool.

Animals are honest and don't deceive.
Well... not much, anyway

On 10/12/2015 12:12 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>>> could show a little affection, but no.
>>
>> Cats don't like to show affection much but know that she loves you to
>> death. I'll bet she lays nearby in your room. Cats like to take
>> control of the household but we know better.
>
> Although she says her cat was 'dumped on her', that cat would have been
> destroyed with her kind intervention. So those who sneer that she has
> a cat that was 'dumped' on her needs to think on that. She has cared
> for this 'dumped' cat, fed it and cared for it when she didn't have to
> do that. That she receives no affection in return says even more about
> her. She does it regardless.
>
>
>
You certainly do manage to turn things around to make it sound like
everyone else is sneering or picking on lucretia for taking in that cat.
She's the one who comes across as disgruntled because the cat doesn't
act all loving.

Jill

On 10/12/2015 5:35 PM, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:52:08 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You're talking to someone with an 18 year old cat that doesn't care a
>>> jot for her! She was dumped on me aged ten, so you would think she
>>> could show a little affection, but no.
>>
>> Cats don't like to show affection much but know that she loves you to
>> death. I'll bet she lays nearby in your room. Cats like to take
>> control of the household but we know better.
>
> They show it in their own way, in their own time.
>
> My two girls are very affectionate to me (in fact I don't get much
> 'screen time' when in front of this computer). Any visitors would
> never get that impression from them, since they either go elsewhere or
> sit in the background when other people are here. People leave... the
> girls want to interact all the time and give smooches.
>
Buffy likes to sit on my lap when I'm in front of the computer. She
gets scritches and purrs and gives my hand little kisses.

She's not very fond of visitors but she does come out to investigate. I
had to have the AC repaired last month (just in time not to need it!)
and she was curious about the guy who was working in the attic. She had
no idea there were magic stairs that descend from the ceiling in the
hallway! That sort of freaked her out.

She hid most of the time until he sat down to create the receipt. Then
she decided she wanted to meet him. She marched right up and started
winding around his legs. He said, "I don't like animals." I didn't
believe him for one minute. He tried very hard not to laugh while
giving her scritches around her ears and under her chin.

Jill

On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:51:08 PM UTC-5, Qbert wrote:
> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> > Dude, I marched in the St. Louis Pride this year, in a group that was well
> > over 50% hetero.
>
> Why?

To offend homophobes. Just kidding. It was fun. I got to throw candy and
trinkets to folks, who were again, over 50% hetero. It was a volunteer thing
for the company I was working for. There were boatloads of companies with
floats and such.

--Bryan

On 10/12/2015 4:09 PM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:51:08 PM UTC-5, Qbert wrote:
>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>> Dude, I marched in the St. Louis Pride this year, in a group that was well
>>> over 50% hetero.
>>
>> Why?
>
> To offend homophobes. Just kidding. It was fun. I got to throw candy and
> trinkets to folks, who were again, over 50% hetero. It was a volunteer thing
> for the company I was working for. There were boatloads of companies with
> floats and such.
>
> --Bryan
>


It's a call for attention where none need be given.

Folks need to get on with their lives and quit parading around to flaunt
themselves.

On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 6:07:39 PM UTC-5, Embudo wrote:
> On 10/12/2015 4:09 PM, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> > On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:51:08 PM UTC-5, Qbert wrote:
> >> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> >>> Dude, I marched in the St. Louis Pride this year, in a group that was well
> >>> over 50% hetero.
> >>
> >> Why?
> >
> > To offend homophobes. Just kidding. It was fun. I got to throw candy and
> > trinkets to folks, who were again, over 50% hetero. It was a volunteer thing
> > for the company I was working for. There were boatloads of companies with
> > floats and such.
> >
> > --Bryan
> >
>
>
> It's a call for attention where none need be given.
>
> Folks need to get on with their lives and quit parading around to flaunt
> themselves.

Because your side lost. Neener, neener.

--Bryan