Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 10:05 AM, Cheri wrote:
> > "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message > news:8d7fc5c9-f397-4405-bcc1- > >> For at least 25 years, wearing a moustache w/o a beard has been...well, >> if the guy isn't a cop or a non-commissioned army officer, a lot of >> folks see that and think, "***." That's not a big deal if one is in a >> stable pair bond, or is disinterested in finding sex partners, but it >> really is the case. >> >> --Bryan > > I don't know anyone ever who has thought that wearing a moustache > without a beard was ***, and I know a lot of people with moustaches too. > > Cheri Yep, sounds pretty silly to me. None of the men I've ever met who had a mustache but no beard were ***. The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-10-09, jmcquown > wrote:
> The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. Gandalf? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 3:12:59 PM UTC-4, notbob wrote:
> On 2015-10-09, jmcquown > wrote: > > > The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. > > Gandalf? He's a fictional character. I don't think JRR Tolkein addressed his sexuality at all. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message ... > On 2015-10-09, jmcquown > wrote: > >> The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. > > Gandalf? LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/8/2015 10:55 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On 8 Oct 2015 15:46:36 GMT, notbob > wrote: > >> On 2015-10-08, Embudo > wrote: >> >>> Soon to return - the van dyke... >> >> Perhaps not. Turns out the beard fell out of fashion in the early >> 20th century due to the discovery that tuberculosis was passed by >> coughing and that the infectuous sputum might rest on one's own >> whiskers. We are now seeing multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis >> (MDR-TB), so the beard may go the way of the slide rule, once more. >> >> I've worn a van dyke for years, but only cuz my fuller beard looks >> terrible. I let it grow out a bit in Winter to keep my face warm. >> >> nb > > Many years ago I grew a full beard, people told me that beard made me > look like my brother, he has a full beard... but he's a flaming > faggot... I couldn't get to my Gilette fast enough. Faggots grow > beards because it's the only [pseudo] manly thing they can do. Faggots > grow beards for one reason and one reason only, it makes their face > look like a ****. > Ha ha, you called Jesus a faggot. You're gonna go to hell!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 12:46 PM, Cheri wrote:
> > "Embudo" > wrote in message speaking of beards > >> >> It's an act, a stage gimmick. > > Of course, just like William Lee Golden of the Oakridge Boys, but it > still doesn't look attractive to me, no matter who they are. > > Cheri 100% agreed. I keep looking for a woodpecker to fly out... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 1:12 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2015-10-09, jmcquown > wrote: > >> The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. > > Gandalf? > LOL! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 2:21 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/8/2015 10:55 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote: >> On 8 Oct 2015 15:46:36 GMT, notbob > wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-08, Embudo > wrote: >>> >>>> Soon to return - the van dyke... >>> >>> Perhaps not. Turns out the beard fell out of fashion in the early >>> 20th century due to the discovery that tuberculosis was passed by >>> coughing and that the infectuous sputum might rest on one's own >>> whiskers. We are now seeing multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis >>> (MDR-TB), so the beard may go the way of the slide rule, once more. >>> >>> I've worn a van dyke for years, but only cuz my fuller beard looks >>> terrible. I let it grow out a bit in Winter to keep my face warm. >>> >>> nb >> >> Many years ago I grew a full beard, people told me that beard made me >> look like my brother, he has a full beard... but he's a flaming >> faggot... I couldn't get to my Gilette fast enough. Faggots grow >> beards because it's the only [pseudo] manly thing they can do. Faggots >> grow beards for one reason and one reason only, it makes their face >> look like a ****. >> > > Ha ha, you called Jesus a faggot. You're gonna go to hell!!! Ut oh!!!!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote:
>On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >wrote: > >>On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >> >>snip >>.. it's years since I had a >>>duck egg, really love them. >> >>Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>eggs) >>Janet US > >A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-10-09 3:10 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> Yep, sounds pretty silly to me. None of the men I've ever met who had a > mustache but no beard were ***. The *** men I've know were all clean > shaven. > Maybe you should wonder about bears. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 3:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, October 9, 2015 at 3:12:59 PM UTC-4, notbob wrote: >> On 2015-10-09, jmcquown > wrote: >> >>> The *** men I've know were all clean shaven. >> >> Gandalf? > > He's a fictional character. I don't think JRR Tolkein addressed > his sexuality at all. > > Cindy Hamilton > I'm pretty sure he didn't. I didn't watch the movies, I read the books. Aside from some wonderful romances sex really didn't enter into it. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 22:38:08 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote: > >"Embudo" > wrote in message ... >> On 10/8/2015 11:27 AM, Cheri wrote: > >>> I don't really think they think it looks attractive, I just think >>> they're going through a lazy phase. ;-) >>> >>> Cheri >> >> For many it's a lifestyle thing - mountain men, bikers, woodsmen, etc. >> >> For MLB pitchers it's some kind of a seasonal good luck charm. >> >> Think Samson. > >I'm sure it's a choice, but...it still looks bad when it's not trimmed and >nasty looking IMO. > >Cheri So we agree... 'zactly my opinion of women who are not well trimmed, it's also nasty looking. Men with beards do NOT look in any way masculine, not unless they think an untrimmed woman's crotch looks masculine. I have always considered and still do that men with beards are faggots, open or closeted but faggots none the less... they are attempting to attract other faggots to their face like it were a nasty untrimmed female crotch. That's why I can't understand mooslims with beards, they abuse women yet they love men with beards... there can be no doubt, none whatsoever, that mooslim males with beards are flaming faggots. Why are images of muhammed forbidden, because he's bearded, he's a faggot, allah is bearded too: http://www.cnn.com/2015/05/04/living...rophet-images/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 5:24 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: > >> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>> >>> snip >>> .. it's years since I had a >>>> duck egg, really love them. >>> >>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>> eggs) >>> Janet US >> >> A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >> you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. > > thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg > Janet US > Then a goose egg? ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 06:16:43 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>Cheri wrote: >> >> "Embudo" > wrote in message ... >> > On 10/8/2015 11:27 AM, Cheri wrote: >> >> >> I don't really think they think it looks attractive, I just think >> >> they're going through a lazy phase. ;-) >> >> >> >> Cheri >> > >> > For many it's a lifestyle thing - mountain men, bikers, woodsmen, etc. >> > >> > For MLB pitchers it's some kind of a seasonal good luck charm. >> > >> > Think Samson. >> >> I'm sure it's a choice, but...it still looks bad when it's not trimmed and >> nasty looking IMO. > >Herez a couple of very cool long beards, imo. >http://www.aceshowbiz.com/images/wen...ng-live-12.jpg Obviously a pair of **** faced queers... look at their salivating pie holes... LOL-LOL |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 19:41:02 -0600, graham > wrote:
>On 08/10/2015 4:38 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 21:29:25 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> On 2015-10-06 19:53, Je?us wrote: >>> >>> >>>>> Yer can't drink quaffing beers when they are really cold. >>>> >>>> Mostly agree with that, but not entirely. I do remember when I ran an >>>> avocado farm in Queensland, circa 1996... the summer days were >>>> meltingly hot and humid. There was nothing better than stopping at the >>>> Cooroy pub for an ice-cold beer straight from the tap on the way home. >>>> >>>> Generally though, I drink my beer at room temperature during winter >>>> and I like them lightly chilled during the warmer months. And when I >>>> say 'beer', I mean properly brewed beer, not the foamy mass-produced >>>> crap that the big breweries produce. >>> >>> >>> It is strange, but a lot of people seem to be under the impression that >>> British beers being served warm has something to do with their inability >>> to refrigerate >> >> LOL, I think all of those people would be in Nth America... ![]() >> >>> it when the reason is that their production of great >>> beers preceded refrigeration and beers were made to taste good at room >>> temperature. They did not need to be cold to taste good. >> >> Exactly right Dave. My favourite bought beer is a traditional ale - >> with sediment still in the bottle. It tastes great at room temperature >> and doesnt have that nasty foamy mouthfeel that the mass produced >> modern stuff that passes for beer has. >> >>> It is unfortunate that so many people base their rating of beer on the >>> amount they can choke down without unfortunate side effects. Beer >>> drinkers tend to be loyal to their brands and don't appreciate that >>> beers can be paired with certain foods. >> >> True also. I have one strange pairing I like - a good beer like >> Coopers Extra strong vintage ale and 90% dark chocolate. >> >My favourite beer when I visit the UK is Adnams. It's a quaffing beer, >i.e., one gulps down ~1/4 pint at a time in contrast to the cold >lager-style beers that one sips. You know, I might get a carton of a decent lager next shopping day. I haven't had a lager in ages! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: >On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: > >snip >.. it's years since I had a >>duck egg, really love them. > >Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >eggs) Duck eggs are richer and thicker than chicken eggs (great for baking). A slightly different flavour too. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:24:45 -0600, Janet B >
wrote: >On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: > >>On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >>wrote: >> >>>On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>> >>>snip >>>.. it's years since I had a >>>>duck egg, really love them. >>> >>>Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>>eggs) >>>Janet US >> >>A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >>you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. > >thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg Ha ![]() some Asian stores would stock them? BTW, a goose egg tastes much like a chicken egg. So does a pigeon egg. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/5/2015 11:44 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:10:04 -0500, Sky > > wrote: > >> On 10/5/2015 6:57 PM, Janet B wrote: >>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:16:15 -0500, Sky > >>> wrote: >> >> Would you recommend the book as a holiday (Christmas) gift? My folks >> like recipes and cookbooks, etc., so I wonder . . . ? TIA ![]() >> >> Sky >> > Yes. The book is laid out well and so are the recipes. It is a soft > cover, decent page size, not to heavy to be useful. It opens and lies > flat (a big plus) No exotic ingredients. A picture for every recipe. > A reason why the recipe works. And just like the show, everything is > in plain language. I'm enjoying it. Truthfully, I've had the book > about two weeks and I keep changing my mind about what I'm going to > try first. Right now it is bed-time reading. > The Complete Cook's Country TV Show Cookbook (every recipe from all > eight seasons) > Janet US > Thanks for the description of the cookbook, Janet. I do believe I may purchase this book soon (have to check budget come end of month). I'll look for the purchase details after I watch Cook's Country when it airs tomorrow afternoon on PBS. I do enjoy the show and how its talented cast demonstrates how everything is so seemingly easy to make! Alas, Cook's Country and ATK do not show the hard work needed afterwards when tools, gadgets, cookware, dishes and flatware have to be cleaned and put away, which can be rather time-consuming for a household of one. Oh well ![]() wonder what the average wages are for their dishwashers and cleaning crews <----- that's a rhetorical question ![]() Sky |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 6:49 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > > wrote: > >> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >> >> snip >> .. it's years since I had a >>> duck egg, really love them. >> >> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >> eggs) > > Duck eggs are richer and thicker than chicken eggs (great for baking). > A slightly different flavour too. > And they appear to me, to have a higher proportion of yolk to white. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:55:24 -0500, Sky >
wrote: >On 10/5/2015 11:44 PM, Janet B wrote: >> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:10:04 -0500, Sky > >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/5/2015 6:57 PM, Janet B wrote: >>>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:16:15 -0500, Sky > >>>> wrote: >>> >>> Would you recommend the book as a holiday (Christmas) gift? My folks >>> like recipes and cookbooks, etc., so I wonder . . . ? TIA ![]() >>> >>> Sky >>> >> Yes. The book is laid out well and so are the recipes. It is a soft >> cover, decent page size, not to heavy to be useful. It opens and lies >> flat (a big plus) No exotic ingredients. A picture for every recipe. >> A reason why the recipe works. And just like the show, everything is >> in plain language. I'm enjoying it. Truthfully, I've had the book >> about two weeks and I keep changing my mind about what I'm going to >> try first. Right now it is bed-time reading. >> The Complete Cook's Country TV Show Cookbook (every recipe from all >> eight seasons) >> Janet US >> > >Thanks for the description of the cookbook, Janet. I do believe I may >purchase this book soon (have to check budget come end of month). I'll >look for the purchase details after I watch Cook's Country when it airs >tomorrow afternoon on PBS. > >I do enjoy the show and how its talented cast demonstrates how >everything is so seemingly easy to make! Alas, Cook's Country and ATK >do not show the hard work needed afterwards when tools, gadgets, >cookware, dishes and flatware have to be cleaned and put away, which can >be rather time-consuming for a household of one. Oh well ![]() >wonder what the average wages are for their dishwashers and cleaning >crews <----- that's a rhetorical question ![]() > >Sky > the book they are selling on the show is for 7 seasons only and is more expensive. You'd be better to shop Amazon or similar. Janet US |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: > >>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >> >> What's that supposed to mean? >> > > If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", > the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 18:59:15 -0400, S Viemeister
> wrote: >On 10/9/2015 6:49 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>> >>> snip >>> .. it's years since I had a >>>> duck egg, really love them. >>> >>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>> eggs) >> >> Duck eggs are richer and thicker than chicken eggs (great for baking). >> A slightly different flavour too. >> >And they appear to me, to have a higher proportion of yolk to white. Yes, I think you're right about that. On the egg theme: For breakfast this morning I put four chicken eggs in a jug with some finely chopped onion, pepper and salt, then mixed it roughly. In a pan I added a little vegetable oil and a good amount of butter, and gently cooked some asparagus spears - removed the spears and lightly cooked the egg mixture. The asparagus and eggs go so well together, I'll be doing that a lot more often. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/10/2015 4:51 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:24:45 -0600, Janet B > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>>> >>>> snip >>>> .. it's years since I had a >>>>> duck egg, really love them. >>>> >>>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>>> eggs) >>>> Janet US >>> >>> A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >>> you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. >> >> thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg > > Ha ![]() > some Asian stores would stock them? > > BTW, a goose egg tastes much like a chicken egg. > So does a pigeon egg. > And a coot's (waterhen) egg. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:16:13 -0600, graham > wrote:
>On 09/10/2015 4:51 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:24:45 -0600, Janet B > >> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>>>> >>>>> snip >>>>> .. it's years since I had a >>>>>> duck egg, really love them. >>>>> >>>>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>>>> eggs) >>>>> Janet US >>>> >>>> A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >>>> you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. >>> >>> thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg >> >> Ha ![]() >> some Asian stores would stock them? >> >> BTW, a goose egg tastes much like a chicken egg. >> So does a pigeon egg. >> >And a coot's (waterhen) egg. Not one I have tried ![]() Do you have Plovers where you are? I'm keen to try one of their eggs. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: > >>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >> >> What's that supposed to mean? >> > > If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", > the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. I'm pretty sure lucretia isn't talking about men she dates. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 6:50 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:55:24 -0500, Sky > > wrote: > >> On 10/5/2015 11:44 PM, Janet B wrote: >>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:10:04 -0500, Sky > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 10/5/2015 6:57 PM, Janet B wrote: >>>>> On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 18:16:15 -0500, Sky > >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Would you recommend the book as a holiday (Christmas) gift? My folks >>>> like recipes and cookbooks, etc., so I wonder . . . ? TIA ![]() >>>> >>> Yes. The book is laid out well and so are the recipes. It is a soft >>> cover, decent page size, not to heavy to be useful. It opens and lies >>> flat (a big plus) No exotic ingredients. A picture for every recipe. >>> A reason why the recipe works. And just like the show, everything is >>> in plain language. I'm enjoying it. Truthfully, I've had the book >>> about two weeks and I keep changing my mind about what I'm going to >>> try first. Right now it is bed-time reading. >>> The Complete Cook's Country TV Show Cookbook (every recipe from all >>> eight seasons) >>> Janet US >>> >> >> Thanks for the description of the cookbook, Janet. I do believe I may >> purchase this book soon (have to check budget come end of month). I'll >> look for the purchase details after I watch Cook's Country when it airs >> tomorrow afternoon on PBS. >> snip >> > the book they are selling on the show is for 7 seasons only and is > more expensive. You'd be better to shop Amazon or similar. > Janet US Thanks for the headsup! I'll check it out ![]() Sky |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 09/10/2015 7:25 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:16:13 -0600, graham > wrote: > >> On 09/10/2015 4:51 PM, Je?us wrote: >>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:24:45 -0600, Janet B > >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> snip >>>>>> .. it's years since I had a >>>>>>> duck egg, really love them. >>>>>> >>>>>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>>>>> eggs) >>>>>> Janet US >>>>> >>>>> A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >>>>> you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. >>>> >>>> thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg >>> >>> Ha ![]() >>> some Asian stores would stock them? >>> >>> BTW, a goose egg tastes much like a chicken egg. >>> So does a pigeon egg. >>> >> And a coot's (waterhen) egg. > > Not one I have tried ![]() > Do you have Plovers where you are? I'm keen to try one of their eggs. > No. My experience of what we called waterhen's eggs was as a boy in Suffolk, UK. Graham |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015-10-09 20:33, jmcquown wrote:
> On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: >> >>>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >>> >>> What's that supposed to mean? >>> >> >> If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", >> the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. > > Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? > > Ask Rock Hudson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 8:48 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 22:31:11 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2015-10-09 20:33, jmcquown wrote: >>> On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >>>>> >>>>> What's that supposed to mean? >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", >>>> the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. >>> >>> Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? >>> >>> >> Ask Rock Hudson > > John Travolta. > Ding! Diana Hyland. Beard. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:28:18 -0600, Embudo > wrote:
> > > > Soon to return - the van dyke... If you take the time to notice, most men with anything less than a full beard can't support one. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 10 Oct 2015 15:32:14 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 21:29:23 -0700, sf > wrote: > > >On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:28:18 -0600, Embudo > wrote: > > > >> > > >> > >> Soon to return - the van dyke... > > > >If you take the time to notice, most men with anything less than a > >full beard can't support one. > > You mean, because they already have a wife? Heh, no. I'm saying their facial hair is thin to non-existent in places which dictates the style they settle on. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bruce wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:17:10 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle > wrote: > >>notbob wrote: >>> On 2015-10-08, Embudo > wrote: >>> >>>> Soon to return - the van dyke... >>> >>> Perhaps not. Turns out the beard fell out of fashion in the early >>> 20th century due to the discovery that tuberculosis was passed by >>> coughing and that the infectuous sputum might rest on one's own >>> whiskers. We are now seeing multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis >>> (MDR-TB), so the beard may go the way of the slide rule, once more. >>> >>> I've worn a van dyke for years, but only cuz my fuller beard looks >>> terrible. I let it grow out a bit in Winter to keep my face warm. >>> >>> nb >> >>I'm going to let mine grow and grow until Xmas, then I'm going to shave >>it all off. > > Without this newsgroup we wouldn't have known this. you might also be interested to know that I got a new high score on paplinko today |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 20:17:02 -0600, graham > wrote:
>On 09/10/2015 7:25 PM, Je?us wrote: >> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 19:16:13 -0600, graham > wrote: >> >>> On 09/10/2015 4:51 PM, Je?us wrote: >>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:24:45 -0600, Janet B > >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 15:56:14 -0300, wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 09:24:55 -0600, Janet B > >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:35 -0300, wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> snip >>>>>>> .. it's years since I had a >>>>>>>> duck egg, really love them. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Why? An egg is an egg -- or not? (no experience except with chicken >>>>>>> eggs) >>>>>>> Janet US >>>>>> >>>>>> A duck egg has a totally different flavour. If you were blindfolded, >>>>>> you'd never mistake it for a chickens egg. >>>>> >>>>> thanks. Now I have to find a duck egg >>>> >>>> Ha ![]() >>>> some Asian stores would stock them? >>>> >>>> BTW, a goose egg tastes much like a chicken egg. >>>> So does a pigeon egg. >>>> >>> And a coot's (waterhen) egg. >> >> Not one I have tried ![]() >> Do you have Plovers where you are? I'm keen to try one of their eggs. >> >No. My experience of what we called waterhen's eggs was as a boy in >Suffolk, UK. As long as the egg is fresh... I'll try it... ones with hard shells at least ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" > wrote in message ... > On Fri, 09 Oct 2015 21:29:23 -0700, sf > wrote: > >>On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 09:28:18 -0600, Embudo > wrote: >> >>> > >>> >>> Soon to return - the van dyke... >> >>If you take the time to notice, most men with anything less than a >>full beard can't support one. > > You mean, because they already have a wife? lololol -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tert in seattle" > wrote in message ... > Bruce wrote: >> On Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:17:10 +0000 (UTC), tert in seattle > wrote: >> >>>notbob wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-08, Embudo > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Soon to return - the van dyke... >>>> >>>> Perhaps not. Turns out the beard fell out of fashion in the early >>>> 20th century due to the discovery that tuberculosis was passed by >>>> coughing and that the infectuous sputum might rest on one's own >>>> whiskers. We are now seeing multiple drug-resistant tuberculosis >>>> (MDR-TB), so the beard may go the way of the slide rule, once more. >>>> >>>> I've worn a van dyke for years, but only cuz my fuller beard looks >>>> terrible. I let it grow out a bit in Winter to keep my face warm. >>>> >>>> nb >>> >>>I'm going to let mine grow and grow until Xmas, then I'm going to shave >>>it all off. >> >> Without this newsgroup we wouldn't have known this. > > you might also be interested to know that I got a new high score on > paplinko today lol I had to look that one up ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 10:31 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-09 20:33, jmcquown wrote: >> On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: >>> >>>>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >>>> >>>> What's that supposed to mean? >>>> >>> >>> If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", >>> the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. >> >> Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? >> >> > Ask Rock Hudson > > This is 2015, not 1985. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/9/2015 10:48 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Oct 2015 22:31:11 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> On 2015-10-09 20:33, jmcquown wrote: >>> On 10/9/2015 6:10 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >>>> On 2015-10-09 2:54 PM, wrote: >>>> >>>>>> Maybe that is because you are their beard. >>>>> >>>>> What's that supposed to mean? >>>>> >>>> >>>> If you really have *** male friends you should know about the "beard", >>>> the female friend that gives the impression they are straight. >>> >>> Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? >>> >>> >> Ask Rock Hudson > > John Travolta. > Lately I've been seeing that old TV show, 'Welcome Back Kotter'. I wondered about Travolta, he did seem to "swish". ![]() to the same woman since the 90's and has children, not that it proves anything. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> > Why would *** men need to pretend they're straight? So they won't lose their jobs or promotions or be shunned by society. Just because *** is "accepted" now doesn't mean much. A *** military man might be accepted but he/she won't ever be promoted beyond a certain level. A civilian company man might get bypassed with promotions and depending on the powers above, could even get fired. This is the real world and there is still lots of anti-*** sentiment around. A company can't officially fire you for being *** but if they want you gone, all it takes is showing up late for work a day or two. If they want to lose you, it's easy enough and very legal too. Personally, I don't care if someone is *** or not. Just keep it to yourself though. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REC: A dessert take on eggs with 'soldiers' | General Cooking | |||
OT Soldiers returning home surprising Familys | General Cooking | |||
2.3 million US Soldiers vs 11.7 million Iranian Soldiers = DRAFT | General Cooking | |||
For Soldiers' Appetites, Reinforcements | General Cooking | |||
Taco Bell Ripping off Soldiers in Kuwait | Restaurants |