On 10/6/2015 10:07 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I almost got a bag last
> time I was there but opted for the breaded chicken tenders instead
> (much more versatile).
>
> -sw


Great choice, more fatty fried food to cram down your gaping dwarf maw!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:55:24 -0500, John Kuthe >
wrote:

>Fish do not have fingers.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/li.../l_034_03.html

>And chickens don't have nuggets either!!

http://davesrockshop.com/media/catal...-min-516-4.jpg

On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:28:29 -0300, wrote:

>On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:26:25 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:29 -0600, Janet B >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:02:03 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>>wrote:
>>>>"Janet B" > wrote in message
m...
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Janet B wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gimme a break! Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
>>>>>>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
>>>>>>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
>>>>>>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
>>>>>>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
>>>>>>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
>>>>>>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
>>>>>>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
>>>>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
>>>>
>>>>Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
>>>
>>>Yes, of course. But probably not in the fashion you are imagining.
>>>This was just a large thing on the operating table.
>>
>>The guy could recover his medical costs by getting his scrotum made
>>into luggage. Donald Trump would love a new bag for his golf clubs.
>
>Good idea - Onassis' most bragged about prize possession was a set of
>bar stools, covered in the skin from whales testicles.

With wealth comes good taste. Apparently

On 10/5/2015 6:21 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/5/2015 2:00 PM, Janet B wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:55:37 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> "Sadly, the early name “cod pieces” failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>> it’s
>>>> for the best"
>>>>
>>>
>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>
>> gimme a break! Really?
>> Janet US
>>
>
> I'm wearing one now. A guy in my position has to. It's made of Kevlar.
> For extra protection I also have a custom-made, carbon nano-tube, merkin
> that's can withstand an acetylene torch flame for 20 seconds. I highly
> recommend these items if you have the wherewithal.


Holy cow, torch proof? You lead a very interesting life for sure!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:52:32 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 07:37:53 +1100, Jeßus wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 13:27:52 -0700 (PDT), Roy >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Fish fingers are an abomination unto the Lord. Ground up processed fish trimmings
>>>lovingly smashed and trashed and coated with whatever is at hand.
>>>Then they are heated until they are half-burned and then frozen and packaged.
>>>Yuck!!!
>>
>> It figures that you think fish fingers can only be highly processed
>> cheap crap. They don't have to be, you know.
>
>The ones at Costco are made from whole pieces of fish and are quite
>meaty. Trident I think is the brand. Unfortunately they're kinda
>tasteless. Needs more additives!

Tartare sauce?

On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:17:29 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
> ...
> > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:02:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Janet B wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Dave Smith wrote:
> >> >>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece
> >> >>> >is.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> gimme a break! Really?
> >> >>
> >> >>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
> >> >>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
> >> >>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
> >> >>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
> >> >>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
> >> >>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
> >> >>
> >> >>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
> >> >>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
> >> >>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
> >> >
> >> > Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
> >> > with the 132 pound scrotum.
> >> > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
> >>
> >> Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
> >>
> >>
> >
> > Please tell me that they are!
>
> Not I, but I leave you to your strange predilections ... and hope you are
> not disappointed!
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

It's not so strange. I've already seen hundreds of photos of cute cats playing the piano, slices of cakes, foamy bars of soap, and even the most depressing photo of a sloppy Joe ever but I missed out on what has got to be the most unusual scrote there ever was. I confess - I'm a virgin on that one.

On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:43:46 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
> On 10/5/2015 6:21 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> > On 10/5/2015 2:00 PM, Janet B wrote:
> >> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:55:37 -0400, Dave Smith
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
> >>>> it's
> >>>> for the best"
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
> >>
> >> gimme a break! Really?
> >> Janet US
> >>
> >
> > I'm wearing one now. A guy in my position has to. It's made of Kevlar.
> > For extra protection I also have a custom-made, carbon nano-tube, merkin
> > that's can withstand an acetylene torch flame for 20 seconds. I highly
> > recommend these items if you have the wherewithal.
>
>
> Holy cow, torch proof? You lead a very interesting life for sure!
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

My imagination just has to take over sometimes.

On 10/6/2015 1:28 PM, wrote:
> Onassis' most bragged about prize possession was a set of
> bar stools, covered in the skin from whales testicles.

Your hubby's nut sack was of some use then...

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/6/2015 1:59 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:43:46 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
>> On 10/5/2015 6:21 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On 10/5/2015 2:00 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:55:37 -0400, Dave Smith
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>>>> it's
>>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>>
>>>> gimme a break! Really?
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm wearing one now. A guy in my position has to. It's made of Kevlar.
>>> For extra protection I also have a custom-made, carbon nano-tube, merkin
>>> that's can withstand an acetylene torch flame for 20 seconds. I highly
>>> recommend these items if you have the wherewithal.
>>
>>
>> Holy cow, torch proof? You lead a very interesting life for sure!
>>
>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
>
> My imagination just has to take over sometimes.
>

Well at least you don't have 132 lbs. to encase :-)

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:17:29 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:02:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> >> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >> > On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >>Janet B wrote:
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Dave Smith wrote:
>> >> >>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod
>> >> >>> >piece
>> >> >>> >is.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> gimme a break! Really?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel
>> >> >>surfing
>> >> >>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
>> >> >>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
>> >> >>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that
>> >> >>it
>> >> >>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
>> >> >>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
>> >> >>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
>> >> >>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
>> >> >
>> >> > Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
>> >> > with the 132 pound scrotum.
>> >> > http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
>> >>
>> >> Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > Please tell me that they are!
>>
>> Not I, but I leave you to your strange predilections ... and hope you are
>> not disappointed!
>>
>>
>
> It's not so strange. I've already seen hundreds of photos of cute cats
> playing the piano, slices of cakes, foamy bars of soap, and even the most
> depressing photo of a sloppy Joe ever but I missed out on what has got to
> be the most unusual scrote there ever was. I confess - I'm a virgin on
> that one.

rofl I have to say, you do have a point )


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 10/6/2015 1:54 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 9:17:29 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Tuesday, October 6, 2015 at 7:02:17 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Janet B wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece
>>>>>>>> is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gimme a break! Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
>>>>>> during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
>>>>>> titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
>>>>>> didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
>>>>>> was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
>>>>>> channel, saying la la la la all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
>>>>>> Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
>>>>>> operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
>>>>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please tell me that they are!
>>
>> Not I, but I leave you to your strange predilections ... and hope you are
>> not disappointed!
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/
>
> It's not so strange. I've already seen hundreds of photos of cute cats playing the piano, slices of cakes, foamy bars of soap, and even the most depressing photo of a sloppy Joe ever but I missed out on what has got to be the most unusual scrote there ever was. I confess - I'm a virgin on that one.
>

And you should keep it that way!

%-)

On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps it's
>>> for the best"
>>>
>>
>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>
> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>
All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...

On 10/5/2015 3:32 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:01:26 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "Roy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 2:13:50 PM UTC-6, Ophelia wrote:
>>>> > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> A good read from one Felicity Cloake:
>>>>>
>>>>> "But whether they are served with hot sauce or ketchup, fish fingers
>>>>> are
>>>>> still fish in its least-threatening form, which may explain why they
>>>>> haven't caught on to the same extent in countries less squeamish about
>>>>> seafood, such as Spain or France. They were introduced to the UK market
>>>>> in
>>>>> 1955 with the sales pitch: "No bones, no waste, no smell, no fuss."
>>>>> They
>>>>> were an immediate hit, selling 600 tonnes in the first year. These
>>>>> days,
>>>>> the figure is closer to 28,000 tonnes, and Birds Eye, which brought
>>>>> them
>>>>> to this country from the United States, claims that three-quarters of
>>>>> us
>>>>> get their first taste of fish from a fish finger."
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandst...e-of-childhood
>>>>
>>>> Nahh unless it was in areas that didn't have fish and chip shops) I
>>>> can't
>>>> actually think of any.
>>>>
>>> Fish fingers are an abomination unto the Lord. Ground up processed fish
>>> trimmings
>>> lovingly smashed and trashed and coated with whatever is at hand.
>>> Then they are heated until they are half-burned and then frozen and
>>> packaged.
>>> Yuck!!!
>>> =====
>>
>> I can only remember trying them once! It was enough.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/
>
> The thing is, if you put a put a fish on a plate and set that before a little kid, he's liable to start bawling. Put some fish sticks in front of the same kid and the outcome is certain - happy kid.
>
Plus they must have some ketchup!

In article >,
says...
>
> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:29 -0600, Janet B >
> wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:02:03 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> >wrote:
> >>"Janet B" > wrote in message
> . ..
> >>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Janet B wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
> >>>>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> gimme a break! Really?
> >>>>
> >>>>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
> >>>>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
> >>>>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
> >>>>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
> >>>>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
> >>>>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
> >>>>
> >>>>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
> >>>>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
> >>>>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
> >>>
> >>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
> >>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
> >>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
> >>
> >>Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
> >
> >Yes, of course. But probably not in the fashion you are imagining.
> >This was just a large thing on the operating table.
>
> The guy could recover his medical costs by getting his scrotum made
> into luggage. Donald Trump would love a new bag for his golf clubs.

Plus he could make a new wig

Janet

On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:41:24 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
>says...
>>
>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:29 -0600, Janet B >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:02:03 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> >wrote:
>> >>"Janet B" > wrote in message
>> . ..
>> >>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>Janet B wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>> >>>>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> gimme a break! Really?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
>> >>>>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
>> >>>>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
>> >>>>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
>> >>>>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
>> >>>>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
>> >>>>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
>> >>>>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
>> >>>
>> >>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
>> >>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
>> >>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
>> >>
>> >>Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
>> >
>> >Yes, of course. But probably not in the fashion you are imagining.
>> >This was just a large thing on the operating table.
>>
>> The guy could recover his medical costs by getting his scrotum made
>> into luggage. Donald Trump would love a new bag for his golf clubs.
>
> Plus he could make a new wig

His hair is totally bizarre, it's hard not to focus on it.

Last night (or the wee hours of this morning, gotta love toothaches),
I watched a documentary called 'The Dark Side of the Greens'.

It was principally about Donald Trump and the disgusting golf course
he is building on some of the most unique sand dunes in the UK
(Scotland). I was absolutely appalled by his attitude towards the
local residents who naturally object to the golf course, calling them
"pigs' and all sort of things. He's even suing a 90 year old woman who
objected to the golf course. She uses her dishwater to flush her
toilet now. It's totally inappropriate to the surrounding
environment, but money talks and he's getting his way. Some of the
residents no longer even have a water supply due to the work done and
he doesnt give a shit. I was *so* angry watching it. It opened my
eyes, I knew he was an asshole but this documentary shows just what an
arrogant ******* he is. Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
America could make to elect him as president. The blowback would be
extreme. And he has the gall to object to proposed nearby wind
generators, saying they would impact visually on his fvcking golf
course! And he's getting his way!

On 10/6/2015 1:41 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:29 -0600, Janet B >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:02:03 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Janet B" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Janet B wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> gimme a break! Really?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
>>>>>> during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
>>>>>> titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
>>>>>> didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
>>>>>> was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
>>>>>> channel, saying la la la la all the time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
>>>>>> Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
>>>>>> operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
>>>>>
>>>>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
>>>>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
>>>>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
>>>
>>> Yes, of course. But probably not in the fashion you are imagining.
>>> This was just a large thing on the operating table.
>>
>> The guy could recover his medical costs by getting his scrotum made
>> into luggage. Donald Trump would love a new bag for his golf clubs.
>
> Plus he could make a new wig
>
> Janet
>

I like that idea, a wig made from a giant nutsack would certainly be
more natural looking.

On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>>>
>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>> it's
>>>> for the best"
>>>>
>>>
>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>
>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>
> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...

I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
worse!

On 10/6/2015 12:32 AM, Janet B wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:51:16 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:

>> It's not something that ever comes up in conversation but
>> I certainly know what it is.
>>
>> Seems like something you might hear about in a Monte Python
>> sketch.

> Or if you ever did any reading.

I've certainly come across the word in a book or three
though which, I couldn't say.

nancy

wrote:
>
> Jeßus wrote:
> >Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
> >America could make to elect him as president.
>
> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
> back where they came from.

Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
for now by being a candidate.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 00:41:24 +0100, Janet > wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> >says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:14:29 -0600, Janet B >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 18:02:03 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> >> >wrote:
> >> >>"Janet B" > wrote in message
> >> . ..
> >> >>> On Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:24:39 -0400, Gary > wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>Janet B wrote:
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Dave Smith wrote:
> >> >>>>> >LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> gimme a break! Really?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>On a somewhat related but very disturbing note. I was channel surfing
> >> >>>>during commercial time last night. I clicked on TLC I think. It was
> >> >>>>titled, "The man with an 80-pound groin." Oh man did I ever wish I
> >> >>>>didn't see that. After watching a few minutes and determining that it
> >> >>>>was a real medical show. I quickly switched to some other friendly
> >> >>>>channel, saying la la la la all the time.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>Anyway, the guy was arguing with his doctor who wanted to remove it.
> >> >>>>Other doctors years ago told him that he could easily die on the
> >> >>>>operating table so that's why he put it off so long.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Different guy apparently. On TV last night was surgery for The Man
> >> >>> with the 132 pound scrotum.
> >> >>> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_4966973.html
> >> >>
> >> >>Please tell me they are not showing a picture of his scrotum???
> >> >
> >> >Yes, of course. But probably not in the fashion you are imagining.
> >> >This was just a large thing on the operating table.
> >>
> >> The guy could recover his medical costs by getting his scrotum made
> >> into luggage. Donald Trump would love a new bag for his golf clubs.
> >
> > Plus he could make a new wig
>
> His hair is totally bizarre, it's hard not to focus on it.
>
> Last night (or the wee hours of this morning, gotta love toothaches),
> I watched a documentary called 'The Dark Side of the Greens'.
>
> It was principally about Donald Trump and the disgusting golf course
> he is building on some of the most unique sand dunes in the UK
> (Scotland). I was absolutely appalled by his attitude towards the
> local residents who naturally object to the golf course, calling them
> "pigs' and all sort of things. He's even suing a 90 year old woman who
> objected to the golf course. She uses her dishwater to flush her
> toilet now. It's totally inappropriate to the surrounding
> environment, but money talks and he's getting his way. Some of the
> residents no longer even have a water supply due to the work done and
> he doesnt give a shit. I was *so* angry watching it. It opened my
> eyes, I knew he was an asshole but this documentary shows just what an
> arrogant ******* he is. Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
> America could make to elect him as president. The blowback would be
> extreme. And he has the gall to object to proposed nearby wind
> generators, saying they would impact visually on his fvcking golf
> course! And he's getting his way!

No, he didn't :-) Your programme must be a year or two out of date.
Scotland got his measure and cut him down to size.

http://www.scotsman.com/news/environ...d-trump-turns-
his-back-on-scotland-1-3301941

We've now seen the disparity between his business boasts and reality.

After his flounce, he came crawling back to Turnberry golfcourse, but
he's had to trim his mouth.

Janet UK

On 10/6/2015 6:52 PM, Je�us wrote:
> I knew he was an asshole but this documentary shows just what an
> arrogant ******* he is. Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
> America could make to elect him as president. The blowback would be
> extreme.


NOT your nation and NOT your call to make.

Stick to killing rabbits, you backwoods crankwit.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
>> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>>> it's
>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>
>>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
>>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>>
>> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
>
> I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
> That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
> worse!


You know the realities of this for sure.

Icky ain't it?

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/7/2015 3:52 AM, wrote:
> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
> general want that if he became President he would


Bugger off canuckleheaded biotch, tend your own political graveyards!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/7/2015 6:43 AM, Gary wrote:
> wrote:
>>
>> Jeßus wrote:
>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>
>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>> back where they came from.
>
> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.

One can but hope.

But allowing canuckleheads to meddlie in OUR affairs is unwarranted!

> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
> for now by being a candidate.

He's a plant by the DNC to deliver Biden.



--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 7:10:26 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
> On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> > On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
> >> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> >>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> >>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
> >>>>> it's
> >>>>> for the best"
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
> >>>
> >>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
> >>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
> >>>
> >> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
> >
> > I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
> > That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
> > worse!
>
>
> You know the realities of this for sure.
>
> Icky ain't it?
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

The weird shit is that people think it's funny to get assaulted by these horny beasts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j75KdkV7n2o

On 10/7/2015 12:05 PM, wrote:
>> He's just grabbing the limelight
>> >for now by being a candidate.
> Don't be too sure...

Not YOUR nation bitch, **** off!

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/7/2015 12:39 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I had a Shrimp Poor Boy for
> lunch today.

Did you make sure to swallow him, or spit like a coward?

You useless virus.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/7/2015 12:13 PM, wrote:
> I don't think any dolphins should be kept in captivity. It's cruel
> and to take kids to swim with dolphins, doesn't teach the kid much.
> Anyone who has seen a dolphin at sea, streaking alongside a ship would

Let me guess, even the randy dolphin won't hump your boney old arse...

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---

On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
>> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>>> it's
>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>
>>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
>>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>>
>> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
>
> I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
> That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
> worse!

Much worse, yes.

On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 7:01:34 PM UTC-5, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
> On 10/5/2015 4:52 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > Unfortunately they're kinda tasteless.
>
>
> Just like YOU, dwarf.
>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freaks...eaksPoster.jpg

Can a giantly obese woman do it with a guy who's kinda short?

--Bryan

On 2015-10-07 8:43 AM, Gary wrote:

>
> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
> for now by being a candidate.


I am not too sure about that. G Dubya was elected twice, and Sarah Palin
was in the ticket with McCain. I can't think of any other explanation
for stuff like that happening.

On 10/7/2015 2:43 AM, Gary wrote:
> wrote:
>>
>> Jeßus wrote:
>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>
>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>> back where they came from.
>
> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.

Famous last words.

> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
> for now by being a candidate.
>

On 10/7/2015 11:28 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 7:10:26 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
>> On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
>>>> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>>>
>>>>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
>>>>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>>>>
>>>> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
>>>
>>> I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
>>> That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
>>> worse!
>>
>>
>> You know the realities of this for sure.
>>
>> Icky ain't it?
>>
>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
>
> The weird shit is that people think it's funny to get assaulted by these horny beasts.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j75KdkV7n2o
>

Yuck!

On 10/7/2015 1:19 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:43:13 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>>
>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>>> back where they came from.
>>
>> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
>> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
>> for now by being a candidate.
>
> Does it matter much whether you vote for Trump or for another one of
> your 'colourful' Republican candidates?
>

If you had the slightest awareness of the broad variations in their
economic policies you'd not ask such an inane question.

On 10/7/2015 8:13 AM, wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:28:48 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 7:10:26 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth wrote:
>>> On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
>>>>> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though perhaps
>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod piece is.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory bottom-feeding
>>>>>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>>>>>
>>>>> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
>>>>
>>>> I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy animals.
>>>> That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
>>>> worse!
>>>
>>>
>>> You know the realities of this for sure.
>>>
>>> Icky ain't it?
>>>
>>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
>>
>> The weird shit is that people think it's funny to get assaulted by these horny beasts.
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j75KdkV7n2o
>
> I don't think any dolphins should be kept in captivity. It's cruel
> and to take kids to swim with dolphins, doesn't teach the kid much.
> Anyone who has seen a dolphin at sea, streaking alongside a ship would
> never condemn it to a life in one of the 'pools' -
>

And then there's the use of dolphins for warfare...

On 10/7/2015 1:51 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 2:43 AM, Gary wrote:
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>>
>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>>> back where they came from.
>>
>> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
>
> Famous last words.

word.

On 10/7/2015 2:06 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 10/7/2015 8:13 AM, wrote:
>> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:28:48 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 7:10:26 AM UTC-10, Mirrror of TrVth
>>> wrote:
>>>> On 10/6/2015 7:31 PM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>> On 10/6/2015 11:14 AM, Embudo wrote:
>>>>>> On 10/6/2015 11:25 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>>> On Monday, October 5, 2015 at 11:55:36 AM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 2015-10-05 5:48 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Sadly, the early name "cod pieces" failed to stick, though
>>>>>>>>> perhaps
>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>> for the best"
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> LOL. Sadly, only drama or history buffs would know what a cod
>>>>>>>> piece is.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Everybody knows that a cod piece is what some unsavory
>>>>>>> bottom-feeding
>>>>>>> shady fishes carry when they feel the need to pack some heat.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the better to fend off those horny dolphins...
>>>>>
>>>>> I can't believe people pay good money to swim with those filthy
>>>>> animals.
>>>>> That's like swimming with your weird uncle that pees in the pool - and
>>>>> worse!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You know the realities of this for sure.
>>>>
>>>> Icky ain't it?
>>>>
>>>> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: ---
>>>
>>> The weird shit is that people think it's funny to get assaulted by
>>> these horny beasts.
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j75KdkV7n2o
>>
>> I don't think any dolphins should be kept in captivity. It's cruel
>> and to take kids to swim with dolphins, doesn't teach the kid much.
>> Anyone who has seen a dolphin at sea, streaking alongside a ship would
>> never condemn it to a life in one of the 'pools' -
>>
>
> And then there's the use of dolphins for warfare...

They're almost as eager to please as bird dogs!

On 07/10/2015 1:25 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:05:57 -0300, wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:43:13 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>>>
>>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>>>> back where they came from.
>>>
>>> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
>>> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
>>> for now by being a candidate.
>>
>> Don't be too sure...
>
> Europeans thought the same way about George Bush. Even more so the
> second time. But guess what. "Oops, they did it again."
>
The rest of the world thought the same about Reagan.
Graham

On 10/7/2015 3:08 PM, graham wrote:
> On 07/10/2015 1:25 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:05:57 -0300, wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:43:13 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>>>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>>>>
>>>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>>>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>>>>> back where they came from.
>>>>
>>>> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
>>>> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
>>>> for now by being a candidate.
>>>
>>> Don't be too sure...
>>
>> Europeans thought the same way about George Bush. Even more so the
>> second time. But guess what. "Oops, they did it again."
>>
> The rest of the world thought the same about Reagan.
> Graham

The "rest of the world" isn't much good at doing more than echoing their
left wing media.

On 10/7/2015 4:02 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Oct 2015 15:08:54 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/2015 1:25 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 15:05:57 -0300, wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 08:43:13 -0400, Gary > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jeßus wrote:
>>>>>>> Trust me, it would be the worst mistake
>>>>>>> America could make to elect him as president.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lol and yet he sets himself up as being so sensitive to what people in
>>>>>> general want that if he became President he would ship all refugees
>>>>>> back where they came from.
>>>>>
>>>>> Trust me. The US citizens aren't that stupid to elect Donald Trump.
>>>>> He won't win and even he knows it. He's just grabbing the limelight
>>>>> for now by being a candidate.
>>>>
>>>> Don't be too sure...
>>>
>>> Europeans thought the same way about George Bush. Even more so the
>>> second time. But guess what. "Oops, they did it again."
>>>
>> The rest of the world thought the same about Reagan.
>
> Not to mention Arnold Schwarzenegger.

Not eligible to run for the Presidency.

Did an adequate job repairing the damage done by former Governor
(recalled) Gray Davis and the state mandated sell-off of power
generating assets that led the energy trading crisis in California.

http://humanevents.com/2003/09/29/te...ll-gray-davis/

Bungled Energy Strategy
A combination of bad luck, incompetence, and greed doomed California’s
experiment with electricity deregulation, but it didn’t have much to do
with the universal media scapegoat, Enron.

....

But it was Gov. Gray Davis who signed off on $42 billion in vastly
overvalued energy contracts in 2001. And it was Davis’s state energy
traders who arranged for the state to pay prices for energy that were
well above market.

State Sen. Tom McClintock (R.)-then an unsuccessful candidate for state
controller and now a gubernatorial candidate-sued last May to invalidate
the contracts based on one negotiator’s blatant conflict of interest.
Vikram Budhraja, a former senior vice president with Southern California
Edison, was retained as a consultant to Edison International even as his
firm was contracted by the state to negotiate California’s power deals
with Edison’s subsidiaries.

After the sweetheart deals were made, Edison’s stock surged. Among the
beneficiaries was Budhraja, who bought Edison stock days after his
consulting company received its contract to negotiate the state rates.
He sold the stock eleven days later at a 40% profit, according to the
Los Angeles Times. Budhraja’s financial disclosure forms indicate that
he received more than $100,000 from EI while his state agency negotiated
with them.

State Attorney General Bill Lockyer (D.) refused to join the lawsuit,
citing the fact that Budhraja had recused himself from some of the
energy deals.

Davis and some of his California apologists-including the members of the
California Public Utilities Commission-are still blaming power suppliers
and traders for “manipulating” the market and withholding power
capacity. But the California Independent System Operator challenged this
theory in a credible rebuttal last October. Moreover, even if the Davis
defenders are right, it does not change the fact that Davis’s
administration approved contracts for ridiculous prices.

The state’s negotiators shocked one energy trading manager at the
Bonneville Power Administration in Oregon, who was quoted in the Wall
Street Journal in March 2001. “They agree to prices that make you
wonder,” he said. “You’d at least think they’d check to see what the
prevailing price is before throwing out their offer.”

It also does not change the fact that Davis had the power to remove caps
on residential energy prices, but failed to do so for purely political
reasons. He thus removed economic incentives for both conservation and
increased energy production. The San Francisco Chronicle recently
defended Davis’s handling of the crisis by arguing “there was no public
will to raise rates for consumers.” But this misses the point entirely.
Instead of making residential consumers pay market prices for their own
electricity-a move that could have cost him politically-Davis instituted
random, rolling blackouts that created chaos and severe economic damage
in many parts of the state. His failure to remove the residential energy
price caps also meant that electricity rates had to be raised on
businesses, further harming the state’s tax and employment base.

> I can't wait until Mickey Mouse
> runs for something. Talk about a political powerhouse.

I can't wait until Australia does something meaningful in the
geopolitical world.

I mean really, I don't have enough decades here left to ever hope to
wait and see that happen.