On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 13:06:17 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Gary" > wrote in message ...
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>
>>> If I were in her position and couldn't get anyone in my local government
>>> on the phone, I'd go to their offices and bother people until I got
>>> some answers.
>>
>> Julie just wanted to moan and groan. She resents people trying to
>> help her resolve the problem. She didn't ask for help.
>>
>> She will just live with it and be miserable. I wouldn't.
>
>I get the impression that Julie isn't asking for answers. She was just
>sympathising with someone who was unhappy about a boat near their house.

Julie can take care of her friends problem by gifting her a cordless
drill. hehehe

"John Kuthe" > wrote in message
...

> Right, which is why we should have NO FENCES!! Of course that's a
> concepot alien to the immaturely egocentric!! :-(
>
> John Kuthe...

People need fences to keep the *concepot aliens* away, which would be people
like you.

Cheri

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 01:04:47 +1100, Xeno >
wrote:

>On 26/10/2015 1:05 AM, Gary wrote:
>> Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>> Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are prawns.
>>>>
>>> Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
>>
>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>
>
>That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed when
>it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".

"shrimps" should only be used relating to more than one variety of
shrimp. The word shrimp is used like the word sheep... the uneducated
say "shrimps/sheeps".

Sqwertz wrote:
> I have called the local code enforcement office several times


You have snitch written all over you, virus.

Sqwertz wrote:
> on't tell us Paul Hogan is really a fraud!


Eat shit and DIE!

Sqwertz wrote:
> OK, so cancel my last post:-)
>
> -sw


Gladly!

On 2015-10-25 9:31 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>> She will just live with it and be miserable. I wouldn't.
>
> I don't think she understands this could start a terrible
> ****ing match with her new neighbor. Forewarned is forearmed,
> but she'd rather stick her head in the sand.
>

I hate to imagine what the neighbour has had to put up with from her.

On 10/25/2015 9:06 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Gary" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>
>>> If I were in her position and couldn't get anyone in my local government
>>> on the phone, I'd go to their offices and bother people until I got
>>> some answers.
>>
>> Julie just wanted to moan and groan. She resents people trying to
>> help her resolve the problem. She didn't ask for help.
>>
>> She will just live with it and be miserable. I wouldn't.
>
> I get the impression that Julie isn't asking for answers. She was just
> sympathising with someone who was unhappy about a boat near their house.
>
>
No... she posted about HER neighbor who has a huge boat parked in the
driveway next door. A boat taller than her house.

Jill

Sqwertz wrote:
> I see it most often written on Chinese menus.
>
> -sw
> forging. it's called forging. tacit approval of casa bona destroying the group simply because it attacks your perceived enemies with no concern for other users. tacit approval of casa bona forging your perceived enemies. no sign whatsoever of you disapproving or asking casa bona to stop disrupting or forging. you made your bed now lie in it. this will not stop until casa bona stops and will extend to forums, blogs and any other suitable online venues.

Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 09:05:43 -0500, Gary wrote:
>
>> Xeno wrote:
>>>
>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>> Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are prawns.
>>>>
>>> Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
>>
>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>
>
> OK, so cancel my last post :-)
>
> -sw
>
> forging. it's called forging. tacit approval of casa bona destroying the group simply because it attacks your perceived enemies with no concern for other users. tacit approval of casa bona forging your perceived enemies. no sign whatsoever of you disapproving or asking casa bona to stop disrupting or forging. you made your bed now lie in it. this will not stop until casa bona stops and will extend to forums, blogs and any other suitable online venues.

On 10/25/2015 10:08 AM, Doris Night wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:46:38 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>
>>> If I were in her position and couldn't get anyone in my local government
>>> on the phone, I'd go to their offices and bother people until I got
>>> some answers.
>>
>> Julie just wanted to moan and groan. She resents people trying to
>> help her resolve the problem. She didn't ask for help.
>
> I think Julie carefully structures the wording in her posts so that no
> actual question is asked, but it appears as though she wants help with
> something.
>
> Doris
>
She certainly does that. Heaven forfend anyone think she'd actually ask
for a suggestion or solution! Yes, it's just another excuse to
complain. I guess there was no spoiled produce or "expired" food to
deal with this time around.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
> On 10/25/2015 10:08 AM, Doris Night wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 08:46:38 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If I were in her position and couldn't get anyone in my local
>>>> government
>>>> on the phone, I'd go to their offices and bother people until I got
>>>> some answers.
>>>
>>> Julie just wanted to moan and groan. She resents people trying to
>>> help her resolve the problem. She didn't ask for help.
>>
>> I think Julie carefully structures the wording in her posts so that no
>> actual question is asked, but it appears as though she wants help with
>> something.
>>
>> Doris
>>
> She certainly does that. Heaven forfend anyone think she'd actually ask
> for a suggestion or solution! Yes, it's just another excuse to
> complain. I guess there was no spoiled produce or "expired" food to
> deal with this time around.
>
> Jill

More of your sick bully biotch bile.

You useless hag.

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:51:41 -0500, John Kuthe >
wrote:

>On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 11:44:27 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>Xeno wrote:
>>>Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>Sqwertz wrote:
>>>>>Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't really care about the fence. It would only be a matter of
>>>>>> feet one way or the other. He is saying that some is on my
>>>>>> property, some is on his.
>>>>>
>>>>> IOW, he wants a bigger yard at the expense of making yours smaller.
>>>>> Let him replace the fence and put it on HIS property. Tell him you'll
>>>>> pay for nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> The ideal, neighbor-friendly fence would be half on each others
>>>>> property. As it is now.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe. I don't know how such things work.
>>>
>>>I suggest that now is the time to start learning. These things can get
>>>incredibly messy. I'd suggest a proper boundary survey just to start
>>>things off. Your fence might be in the correct position for all you
>>>know. You might also want to legally establish that the fence has been
>>>in its current position for X years to date.
>>
>>It's never a good idea to place a fence ON a property line, when your
>>neighbor moves your new neighbor can make you move your fence. When
>>erecting a fence have it inside your property at least 3', so you can
>>legally walk/work on the other side, if you want to repair/paint your
>>fence, or just pull weeds.... in most jurisdictions code calls for a
>>minimum fence set back, one would be wise to check with the town
>>before installing a fence, there would be height restrictions as well
>>as what type of fence is permitted, many communities prohibit chain
>>link fence, and also require obtaining a permit. Fences are the
>>number one cause of neighbor disputes.
>
>Right, which is why we should have NO FENCES!! Of course that's a
>concepot alien to the immaturely egocentric!! :-(

The only fences I see around here are to enclose livestock, otherwise
hedgerows are used on property lines, just an untended wide swath.

On 2015-10-25 10:04 AM, Xeno wrote:

>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>
>
> That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed when
> it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".
> Interestingly, until then, we never used to cook prawns on the barbie.
> We still don't. An American thing I suppose!
>>
>> Personally, when eating steamed/boiled shrimp, I like the 41-50 count.
>> Those are a nice bite size. 31-40 are fine too. Also, steamed and
>> boiled are where it's acceptable to have them served with shells on.
>> You eat them with your hands and remove the shells first, unlike sf.
>>
>> Smaller, I would use in a recipe.
>> Larger size would be for peeling and butterflying before cooking in
>> butter and garlic or whatever.
>>
>
There are pros and cons to cooking them in the shell. Marinades will
impart more flavour if the shells are removed first. There is still a
nice flavour when they are grilled in the shell. Another benefit is
that it slows people down so fewer shrimp will go further.

When I grill shrimp I use a marinade of olive oil, lemon or lime juice,
salt, pepper, a good dash of Worcestershire, hot sauce and chopped
parsley and lots of chopped parsley. They should only marinate for about
an hour so that the citrus does not cook them.

If you have shrimp in the 30 count range you can usually start by laying
them on the grill. Once you get them all on the grill you can go back
and flip them over. Once they are all flipped over it is time to start
taking them off.

On 2015-10-25 12:12 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> Most town zoning board information is on line... in most towns the
> ordinance says boats/trailers must be set behind the rear building
> line, in other words behind one's dwelling... not in the side yard
> either, or even visible from the road... in many towns boats/trailers
> are not permitted on ones property unless inside a closed storage
> building and the storage building must be permitted or you're SOL...
> people would need to rent space at a marina, etc. I've lived within a
> five minute walk of the sea most of my life, and I've owned lakefront
> property, I'm very familiar with zoning codes relating to boats,
> trailors, and recreational vehicles. It's bet to check with the
> zoning commissioner and not to assume, because even what's on line may
> not be up to date, and such situations are open to interpretation.



I am so glad that my former next door neighbour planted a number of
trees in his front yard, mainly as a visual barrier that blocks our view
of the redneck neighbour on the far side. That house has a very deep
but very narrow piece of property. He had hoped to build a garage or
out building of some type behind the house but after his first spring
here he saw how the back part floods. At the moment he has his camper
trailer and a car in his driveway. There is a cheap plastic "garage"
with a mini loader/backhoe and his lawn tractor. Two vehicles that still
work and one that doesn't. One the other side of his lawn he has a 2
axle utility trailer loaded up with a bunch of crap.

On nice days he always has his Harley out on the driveway. I have only
seen him out on the bike 3 or 4 times. At least he took down the rebel
flag.

On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 10:15:34 PM UTC-6, Villanueva wrote:
> Roy wrote:
> > On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:17:14 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> >> "Roy" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:57:27 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>> "Roy" > wrote in message
> >>>> ...
> >>>>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 5:04:25 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
> >>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >>>>>> ...
> >>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:13:27 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 10/20/2015 9:16 PM, wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 7:34:38 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> And
> >>>>>>>>>> he has parked said trailer in front of our house so that one of
> >>>>>>>>>> us
> >>>>>>>>>> has
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>> find someplace else to park our vehicle. Our driveway will hold
> >>>>>>>>>> two
> >>>>>>>>>> cars
> >>>>>>>>>> but we have three. They also have two older kids who will be
> >>>>>>>>>> driving
> >>>>>>>>>> soon
> >>>>>>>>>> and may have their own vehicles.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Ask him to move the trailer as he's taking up YOUR parking space.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Not if the trailer is legal to be parked on the street. It may not
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>> courteous, but it is legal
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> It's illegal to park a trailer on the street in Bothell.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> But I keep telling you that I am not *in* Bothell. Yes, that is my
> >>>>>> address.
> >>>>>> I am in unincorporated Snohomish county so those rules do not apply
> >>>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So phone the county and find out what the county regulations are. I
> >>>>> have a
> >>>>> cousin
> >>>>> who lives in that county as well and I'm sure she knows every
> >>>>> regulation
> >>>>> in force.
> >>>>> Its in her best interests to know these things, she has lived there for
> >>>>> the past 45 years or so.
> >>>>> ====
> >>>>
> >>>> Phone the county? Apparently you don't know how things work here.
> >>>> Almost
> >>>> everything is done online now.
> >>>
> >>> Phone them, online them, smoke-signal them...whatever...just DO IT.
> >>> Why are you querying a food group about zoning, parking, whatever when
> >>> the county in which you reside HAS the answers? Geez...some people's kids.
> >>> ====
> >>
> >> I wasn't querying. I did not ask a question at all. I don't want answers
> >> here. It's just that the subject came up before and I could not believe
> >> that a boat on someone else's property would be upsetting. But now I can
> >> see why it would be.
> >>
> >> See? It is happening again. People acting like I am stupid. Giving me
> >> information that does not apply and that I did not ask for. Then getting
> >> angry because I did not thank them.
> >
> > Who's angry?...I'm not angry. WE "the other posters", are just trying to HELP you cope with life's little annoyances...so that we can get back to the discussion of FOOD and COOKING instead of boats and ocean liners taking up parking spots.
> > ====
> >
>
>
> You have the ability to read other posts, not just hers, yes?
>
> Try it.

How dare you to try and tell me what posts to read...are you some kind of dictator or censor?
**** off and censor your enemies...geez what an asshole you are proving to be.
=========

Roy wrote:
> On Saturday, October 24, 2015 at 10:15:34 PM UTC-6, Villanueva wrote:
>> Roy wrote:
>>> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:17:14 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>> "Roy" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 at 3:57:27 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>> "Roy" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, October 21, 2015 at 5:04:25 PM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 22:13:27 -0400, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10/20/2015 9:16 PM, wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, October 20, 2015 at 7:34:38 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> And
>>>>>>>>>>>> he has parked said trailer in front of our house so that one of
>>>>>>>>>>>> us
>>>>>>>>>>>> has
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> find someplace else to park our vehicle. Our driveway will hold
>>>>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>>>>> cars
>>>>>>>>>>>> but we have three. They also have two older kids who will be
>>>>>>>>>>>> driving
>>>>>>>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>>>> and may have their own vehicles.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ask him to move the trailer as he's taking up YOUR parking space.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not if the trailer is legal to be parked on the street. It may not
>>>>>>>>>> be
>>>>>>>>>> courteous, but it is legal
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It's illegal to park a trailer on the street in Bothell.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> But I keep telling you that I am not *in* Bothell. Yes, that is my
>>>>>>>> address.
>>>>>>>> I am in unincorporated Snohomish county so those rules do not apply
>>>>>>>> here.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So phone the county and find out what the county regulations are. I
>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>> cousin
>>>>>>> who lives in that county as well and I'm sure she knows every
>>>>>>> regulation
>>>>>>> in force.
>>>>>>> Its in her best interests to know these things, she has lived there for
>>>>>>> the past 45 years or so.
>>>>>>> ====
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Phone the county? Apparently you don't know how things work here.
>>>>>> Almost
>>>>>> everything is done online now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Phone them, online them, smoke-signal them...whatever...just DO IT.
>>>>> Why are you querying a food group about zoning, parking, whatever when
>>>>> the county in which you reside HAS the answers? Geez...some people's kids.
>>>>> ====
>>>>
>>>> I wasn't querying. I did not ask a question at all. I don't want answers
>>>> here. It's just that the subject came up before and I could not believe
>>>> that a boat on someone else's property would be upsetting. But now I can
>>>> see why it would be.
>>>>
>>>> See? It is happening again. People acting like I am stupid. Giving me
>>>> information that does not apply and that I did not ask for. Then getting
>>>> angry because I did not thank them.
>>>
>>> Who's angry?...I'm not angry. WE "the other posters", are just trying to HELP you cope with life's little annoyances...so that we can get back to the discussion of FOOD and COOKING instead of boats and ocean liners taking up parking spots.
>>> ====
>>>
>>
>>
>> You have the ability to read other posts, not just hers, yes?
>>
>> Try it.
>
> How dare you to try and tell me what posts to read...

I just did you tantruming little crayola head!

> are you some kind of dictator or censor?

For suggesting you IGNORE posts that **** you off?

> **** off and censor your enemies...

I never have.

> geez what an asshole you are proving to be.
> =========

And what a stump-stupid tundra jumper you are.

On 10/25/2015 10:45 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I see it most often written on Chinese menus.
>
> -sw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 10/25/2015 10:34 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> OK, so cancel my last post:-)
>
> -sw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 10/25/2015 10:32 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> (he has been
> charged several times with major tax fraud, at least)
>
> -sw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 10/25/2015 10:13 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> I have called the local code enforcement office several times
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 11:51:47 AM UTC-4, John Kuthe wrote:

> Right, which is why we should have NO FENCES!! Of course that's a
> concepot alien to the immaturely egocentric!! :-(

I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
to the task.

Cindy Hamilton

On 10/25/2015 3:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 11:51:47 AM UTC-4, John Kuthe wrote:
>
>> Right, which is why we should have NO FENCES!! Of course that's a
>> concepot alien to the immaturely egocentric!! :-(
>
> I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
> occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
> to the task.

Seems like a good spot to put a couple of nice looking
boulders. A rock garden.

nancy

On 26/10/2015 2:02 AM, cshenk wrote:
> Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 26/10/2015 1:05 AM, Gary wrote:
>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>> Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are prawns.
>>>>>
>>>> Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
>>>
>>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>>
>>
>> That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed
>> when it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".
>> Interestingly, until then, we never used to cook prawns on the
>> barbie. We still don't. An American thing I suppose!
>
> Interesting, because I've had them in Darwin and the phrase wasn't used
> anyplace else then. Furthermore, it's not a common place for Americans
> to visit.
>
> Carol
>
Darwin is not a common place for Aussies to visit either. You may have
noticed its remoteness from the more populated parts of Australia. It's
a 'different world' up there.

In my 63 years I have attended a very large number of barbecues all over
Australia and I have never seen prawns cooked on a barbie at an Aussie
barbecue.
The only time I've seen prawns on a barbie was at an Asian household. At
the time I thought it strange.

--

Xeno

On Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:00:36 +1100, Xeno >
wrote:

>On 26/10/2015 2:02 AM, cshenk wrote:
>> Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 26/10/2015 1:05 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>>> Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are prawns.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
>>>>
>>>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>>>
>>>
>>> That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed
>>> when it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".
>>> Interestingly, until then, we never used to cook prawns on the
>>> barbie. We still don't. An American thing I suppose!
>>
>> Interesting, because I've had them in Darwin and the phrase wasn't used
>> anyplace else then. Furthermore, it's not a common place for Americans
>> to visit.
>>
>> Carol
>>
>Darwin is not a common place for Aussies to visit either. You may have
>noticed its remoteness from the more populated parts of Australia. It's
>a 'different world' up there.
>
>In my 63 years I have attended a very large number of barbecues all over
>Australia and I have never seen prawns cooked on a barbie at an Aussie
>barbecue.
>The only time I've seen prawns on a barbie was at an Asian household. At
>the time I thought it strange.

All sorts of crustaceans including shrimp/prawns are commonly grilled
worldwide.

Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 26/10/2015 2:02 AM, cshenk wrote:
> > Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On 26/10/2015 1:05 AM, Gary wrote:
> > > > Xeno wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Ophelia wrote:
> > > > > > Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are
> > > > > > prawns.
> > > > > >
> > > > > Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
> > > >
> > > > So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
> > > >
> > >
> > > That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed
> > > when it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".
> > > Interestingly, until then, we never used to cook prawns on the
> > > barbie. We still don't. An American thing I suppose!
> >
> > Interesting, because I've had them in Darwin and the phrase wasn't
> > used anyplace else then. Furthermore, it's not a common place for
> > Americans to visit.
> >
> > Carol
> >
> Darwin is not a common place for Aussies to visit either. You may
> have noticed its remoteness from the more populated parts of
> Australia. It's a 'different world' up there.
>
> In my 63 years I have attended a very large number of barbecues all
> over Australia and I have never seen prawns cooked on a barbie at an
> Aussie barbecue. The only time I've seen prawns on a barbie was at
> an Asian household. At the time I thought it strange.

Well, Darwin is not southern OZ for sure! In fact, even Brisbane is
pretty different in feel.

Either way, most of my relation to OZ is from Darwin. Due to ship
movements, been there something like 12 times? Not really sure but i
can give you walking directions about the place.

--

On 26/10/2015 12:13 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 26/10/2015 2:02 AM, cshenk wrote:
>>> Xeno wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>>
>>>> On 26/10/2015 1:05 AM, Gary wrote:
>>>>> Xeno wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>>>>> Shrimps to us are really tiny ones. Anything bigger are
>>>>>>> prawns.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here in the land of Oz, they are all prawns.
>>>>>
>>>>> So what's with the phrase, "shrimps on the barbee?"
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That was an ad specifically tailored to Americans. We all laughed
>>>> when it was shown here. We NEVER use the term "shrimps".
>>>> Interestingly, until then, we never used to cook prawns on the
>>>> barbie. We still don't. An American thing I suppose!
>>>
>>> Interesting, because I've had them in Darwin and the phrase wasn't
>>> used anyplace else then. Furthermore, it's not a common place for
>>> Americans to visit.
>>>
>>> Carol
>>>
>> Darwin is not a common place for Aussies to visit either. You may
>> have noticed its remoteness from the more populated parts of
>> Australia. It's a 'different world' up there.
>>
>> In my 63 years I have attended a very large number of barbecues all
>> over Australia and I have never seen prawns cooked on a barbie at an
>> Aussie barbecue. The only time I've seen prawns on a barbie was at
>> an Asian household. At the time I thought it strange.
>
> Well, Darwin is not southern OZ for sure! In fact, even Brisbane is
> pretty different in feel.

Sure is... We live only 450 kilometres south of Brisbane so we do
shopping trips up that way now and then.
>
> Either way, most of my relation to OZ is from Darwin. Due to ship
> movements, been there something like 12 times? Not really sure but i
> can give you walking directions about the place.
>
Never been to Darwin myself. Been to every other capital city in Oz but
missed that one. A friend of mine was there in the 70s when Cyclone
Tracy just about wiped the place off the map. After seeing all his pics
of years ago, I sort of lost interest in any cyclone affected areas.
Lived for a time north of the 26th parallel back when I was young and
foolish and even hundreds of kilometres inland we used to get the
cyclone warnings. Now I keep to the south of that parallel and leave
that blustery northern clime to those who dote on that sort of thing. ;-)

--

Xeno

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:40:21 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:

> Sqwertz wrote:
> > I have called the local code enforcement office several times
>
>
> You have snitch written all over you, virus.

He was probably the type of childhood bully who called for his mommy
every time someone stood up to him.

--

sf

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

> I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
> occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
> to the task.

A ditch would work even better.

--

sf

On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:13:56 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

> On 10/25/2015 3:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Sunday, October 25, 2015 at 11:51:47 AM UTC-4, John Kuthe wrote:
> >
> >> Right, which is why we should have NO FENCES!! Of course that's a
> >> concepot alien to the immaturely egocentric!! :-(
> >
> > I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
> > occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
> > to the task.
>
> Seems like a good spot to put a couple of nice looking
> boulders. A rock garden.
>
I like the way you think Nancy.


--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 10:40:21 -0600, Villanueva > wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> I have called the local code enforcement office several times
>>
>>
>> You have snitch written all over you, virus.
>
> He was probably the type of childhood bully who called for his mommy
> every time someone stood up to him.
>
Hence his hatred/neediness for women.

On 2015-10-26 11:52 AM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>> I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
>> occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
>> to the task.
>
> A ditch would work even better.

I used to have a neighbour like that. We share an unopened road
allowance and his house is further back an on the opposite site. He
considered it to be his driveway but in confrontations with him I always
referred to it as road allowance. Even though the laneway back to his
place had more than ample gravel surface, we would often drive on the
grass on my side. He never drove on the grass on his side.

During the winter he would plow the lane, always pushing the gravel
laden snow over to my side, and he would drive on my side, even through
the snow. When I cleared out my parking area I would pile the snow up at
the corner of my parking are and the lane. It was a visual and a
physical barrier that should have reminded him to stay on the gravel and
off the lawn. Nope. He would drive right through it with is pick up
truck. What an ass. He had plowed out the lane and it was off to one side.

I put an end to it one very very cold night. I had shovelled out the
parking area and piled the snow at the edge of the lane. I went out
every a couple times and hour and threw a pail of water on the pile.
The next day when I got home from work I saw the tire tracks where he
drove across my lawn and then struck the snow pile. It was funny to see
the two lines of rust that had fallen off his front and rear bumpers and
the how the back wheels slipped over to one side when the truck his that
pile of solid ice.

He never said a word about it. He also stopped driving on my grass.

On Monday, October 26, 2015 at 3:44:13 PM UTC-6, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2015-10-26 11:52 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:43:19 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
> >> occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
> >> to the task.
> >
> > A ditch would work even better.
>
> I used to have a neighbour like that. We share an unopened road
> allowance and his house is further back an on the opposite site. He
> considered it to be his driveway but in confrontations with him I always
> referred to it as road allowance. Even though the laneway back to his
> place had more than ample gravel surface, we would often drive on the
> grass on my side. He never drove on the grass on his side.
>
> During the winter he would plow the lane, always pushing the gravel
> laden snow over to my side, and he would drive on my side, even through
> the snow. When I cleared out my parking area I would pile the snow up at
> the corner of my parking are and the lane. It was a visual and a
> physical barrier that should have reminded him to stay on the gravel and
> off the lawn. Nope. He would drive right through it with is pick up
> truck. What an ass. He had plowed out the lane and it was off to one side.
>
> I put an end to it one very very cold night. I had shovelled out the
> parking area and piled the snow at the edge of the lane. I went out
> every a couple times and hour and threw a pail of water on the pile.
> The next day when I got home from work I saw the tire tracks where he
> drove across my lawn and then struck the snow pile. It was funny to see
> the two lines of rust that had fallen off his front and rear bumpers and
> the how the back wheels slipped over to one side when the truck his that
> pile of solid ice.
>
> He never said a word about it. He also stopped driving on my grass.

I like it. I had a neighbour who infringed on my property in Red Deer every chance he got.
I was so happy to sell my property and get away from that arsehole.
====

On 10/26/2015 11:52 AM, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:13:56 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
>> On 10/25/2015 3:43 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>>> I'd love to put a big 'ol fence on the side where my neighbors
>>> occasionally drive on my lawn, their own 1-acre lot being insufficient
>>> to the task.
>>
>> Seems like a good spot to put a couple of nice looking
>> boulders. A rock garden.
>>
> I like the way you think Nancy.

I'm not overly territorial, but that's just rude, driving
on someone's lawn.

nancy

On 2015-10-26 6:16 PM, Roy wrote:

>> He never said a word about it. He also stopped driving on my grass.
>
> I like it. I had a neighbour who infringed on my property in Red Deer every chance he got.
> I was so happy to sell my property and get away from that arsehole.

I had that asshole for a neighbour for 30 years. His wife was nice but
he was a jerk. They sold the place and we had nice neighbours, but they
sold the place and moved to a place a long way north of here. The new
neighbour is a bigger jerk than the original one. Once again, the wife
is nice but the guy is an Ahole

"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
...
> On 2015-10-26 6:16 PM, Roy wrote:
>
>>> He never said a word about it. He also stopped driving on my grass.
>>
>> I like it. I had a neighbour who infringed on my property in Red Deer
>> every chance he got.
>> I was so happy to sell my property and get away from that arsehole.
>
> I had that asshole for a neighbour for 30 years. His wife was nice but he
> was a jerk. They sold the place and we had nice neighbours, but they sold
> the place and moved to a place a long way north of here. The new neighbour
> is a bigger jerk than the original one. Once again, the wife is nice but
> the guy is an Ahole

I will have to see about these people. They seem to be coming across as
generally loud and annoying but they have not actually moved in there yet.