I bought a NY Power Ball ticket today, the first lottery ticket I've
bought since 1964. It's up to $700,000,000... WTF would I do with
that kind of money? I wouldn't buy a new wardrobe, I definitely
wouldn't eat differently, I'd still cook all my own food. I'd
probably buy a new vehicle and have a new heated garage built, I could
do that now. I wouldn't move somewhere else, I like living here. My
life would change very little... okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
maybe... I really detest having my hair cut. I really don't know what
I'd do with all that money. I plan on winning or I'd not have bought
a ticket, but I don't imagine my life would change one iota. I've
been agonizing all day about what I'd do with all those winnings, but
I can't think of anything that would change... I'd still take care of
all my cats the same, I'd still feed the birds and all the other
critters. I honestly can't think of anything that would change, which
means I live like a multi millionaire now. Okay, I may buy a new
shower curtain. LOL

On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 7:53:56 PM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> I bought a NY Power Ball ticket today, the first lottery ticket I've
> bought since 1964. It's up to $700,000,000... WTF would I do with
> that kind of money? I wouldn't buy a new wardrobe, I definitely
> wouldn't eat differently, I'd still cook all my own food. I'd
> probably buy a new vehicle and have a new heated garage built, I could
> do that now. I wouldn't move somewhere else, I like living here. My
> life would change very little... okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> maybe... I really detest having my hair cut. I really don't know what
> I'd do with all that money. I plan on winning or I'd not have bought
> a ticket, but I don't imagine my life would change one iota. I've
> been agonizing all day about what I'd do with all those winnings, but
> I can't think of anything that would change... I'd still take care of
> all my cats the same, I'd still feed the birds and all the other
> critters. I honestly can't think of anything that would change, which
> means I live like a multi millionaire now. Okay, I may buy a new
> shower curtain. LOL

Concubines.

--Bryan

Sqwertz wrote:
> Not in New York,
> that's for sure. Or any of 48 other states.
>
> -sw
Like your sick woman-stalking, you inhuman dwarf!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Why do you even bother posting if that's all you have to say? We've
heard the same thing at least 2,000 times by now."

-sw

"OK, so it's your planet so I guess you get to define what all teens on
Planet Bove eat. We'll need to add this to the Planet Bove Wikipedia
entry: "Teenagers on Planet Bove only eat chicken strips, fries, and
baby carrots".

-sw

"Incredible. And you STILL don't shut up."

-sw

I thought you were here just to talk about cooking? You've only said
that at least 25 times, yet 95% of the flack you get is about
off-topic subjects.

-sw

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


Now EVERYONE knows how you abuse women.

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> maybe...


Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?

On 1/7/2016 8:53 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> I bought a NY Power Ball ticket today, the first lottery ticket I've
> bought since 1964. It's up to $700,000,000... WTF would I do with
> that kind of money? I wouldn't buy a new wardrobe, I definitely
> wouldn't eat differently, I'd still cook all my own food. I'd
> probably buy a new vehicle and have a new heated garage built, I could
> do that now. I wouldn't move somewhere else, I like living here. My
> life would change very little...

Agree on life changes. Sure, I'd probably buy a new car or three but it
would be too much bother to move. I'd have to hide from the leeches for
a while though. Maybe hop into one of my fancy new cars with a bag of
money and go.

I'd spend the rest of my time with hobbies and giving money away to
places it would do a lot of good.

Grandkids would get a little fun money but nothing substantial until
they are older and experienced the real working world.

On 1/7/2016 8:36 PM, spamola de spammyro is a:

> hillbilly

Typical spammyshitbrain response from a gutless coward WHO NEVER SERVED!

Gonna man up some day, you disgusting cowardly traitor?

Do you ever have anything of interest, or substance, to say?

You are a little dick bitch who feels like it is his civic duty as
a Usenet troll to place his nose firmly in the sphincters of those he
dislikes every time they post. They all own you, spammy, you useless
piece of SHIT!

'Shit happens'
---Traitorous Spammy's reply to the fact that 34 Americans
died and 170 were injured when Israel attacked the USS
Liberty.
Spammy is a gutless coward who has never served his country in
uniform.

On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 12:25:44 AM UTC-5, TSILABOLG wrote:
> On 1/7/2016 8:36 PM, spamola de spammyro is a:
>
> > hillbilly
>
> Typical spammyshitbrain response from a gutless coward WHO NEVER SERVED!
>
> Gonna man up some day, you disgusting cowardly traitor?

If everybody tried to enlist in the military, do you think there would
be room for all of them? Your disdain for those who have never served
is misplaced.

Cindy Hamilton

If I won it I'd have to move to Europe to live and move around a lot there.

On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 5:46:30 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 12:25:44 AM UTC-5, TSILABOLG wrote:
> > On 1/7/2016 8:36 PM, spamola de spammyro is a:
> >
> > > hillbilly
> >
> > Typical spammyshitbrain response from a gutless coward WHO NEVER SERVED!
> >
> > Gonna man up some day, you disgusting cowardly traitor?
>
> If everybody tried to enlist in the military, do you think there would
> be room for all of them? Your disdain for those who have never served
> is misplaced.
>
After Viet Nam, where working class boys were drafted to fight for
capitalism, while the sons of the rich got to stay home, safe on
college deferments, while enjoying the pleasures of the working
class girls, I have absolutely ZERO respect for the USA military.

I'd rather kill/die fighting AGAINST fascism than for fascism, and
if you don't consider the above scenario fascism, then you don't
know how to use the English language.

At the same time, I acknowledge that the USA has an obligation to
*all* veterans that is more sacred than any contract between two
capitalist entities, one that transcends any concept of *property
rights*.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

--Bryan

cibola de oro wrote:
>
> Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> > maybe...
>
> Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?

LOL! Call me a southern, roadkill-eating hillbilly then.
I also got my haircut yesterday. It had been only a few days
short of 7 months. Last haircut was last June 11.

Needless to say, after the long overdue haircut, I finally feel
like a member of society again. WHEW! In construction type
work, haircuts are not required so I always let mine go longer
than I should.

I'm still happy with my hair after 4 months, but after that it starts
to bug me a bit, slowly. I keep putting it off and putting it off. By
the time I finally get to the barber, I don't care how they do...just
cut it, please.

And since I only go twice a year, I always tip them well so they are
happy with the extra work they might have to do. Haircuts are $17
there. I always give them $25. A good tip for them and a cheap price
for me annually. $50 per year is cheap haircutting.

On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 8:00:32 PM UTC-6, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Thursday, January 7, 2016 at 7:53:56 PM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > I bought a NY Power Ball ticket today, the first lottery ticket I've
> > bought since 1964. It's up to $700,000,000... WTF would I do with
> > that kind of money? I wouldn't buy a new wardrobe, I definitely
> > wouldn't eat differently, I'd still cook all my own food. I'd
> > probably buy a new vehicle and have a new heated garage built, I could
> > do that now. I wouldn't move somewhere else, I like living here. My
> > life would change very little... okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> > maybe... I really detest having my hair cut. I really don't know what
> > I'd do with all that money. I plan on winning or I'd not have bought
> > a ticket, but I don't imagine my life would change one iota. I've
> > been agonizing all day about what I'd do with all those winnings, but
> > I can't think of anything that would change... I'd still take care of
> > all my cats the same, I'd still feed the birds and all the other
> > critters. I honestly can't think of anything that would change, which
> > means I live like a multi millionaire now. Okay, I may buy a new
> > shower curtain. LOL
>
> Concubines.
>
> --Bryan

Bryan's first thought: his penis!

Infantile, completely selfish and ridiculously indicitive of his mental health disorder!! Once again!! Sounds like what a raging adolescent male might say!

John Kuthe...

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 12:25:44 AM UTC-5, TSILABOLG wrote:
>> On 1/7/2016 8:36 PM, spamola de spammyro is a:
>>
>>> hillbilly
>>
>> Typical spammyshitbrain response from a gutless coward WHO NEVER SERVED!
>>
>> Gonna man up some day, you disgusting cowardly traitor?
>
> If everybody tried to enlist in the military, do you think there would
> be room for all of them? Your disdain for those who have never served
> is misplaced.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
This is the same old libitarded "chickenhawk" venom, the notion that
because one had the immediate circumstances or God-given physical
capacity to joint the military they are somehow imbued with some greater
portion of citizens' rights, national worth, or other special status
that elevates them to a superior position to all other citizens,
including those may be disabled, home-makers, EMTs, police officers, etc.

You won't change a creature like this from it's hateful pogrom against
those who (just a guess) missed out on being drafted to Vietnam, nor
will you deter it from lashing out against any and all who have not
served but might have the temerity to have a say in our nation's
direction through the ballot box.

Weep for it - the thing is in deep soul-destroying pain, and has been
for most of it's wretched life.

Pity is appropriate here, if not outright scorn.

wrote:
> If I won it I'd have to move to Europe to live and move around a lot there.
>
Beware packs of roving Muzzie rapists, they have had their way with
Germany already.

MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 5:46:30 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 12:25:44 AM UTC-5, TSILABOLG wrote:
>>> On 1/7/2016 8:36 PM, spamola de spammyro is a:
>>>
>>>> hillbilly
>>>
>>> Typical spammyshitbrain response from a gutless coward WHO NEVER SERVED!
>>>
>>> Gonna man up some day, you disgusting cowardly traitor?
>>
>> If everybody tried to enlist in the military, do you think there would
>> be room for all of them? Your disdain for those who have never served
>> is misplaced.
>>
> After Viet Nam, where working class boys were drafted to fight for
> capitalism, while the sons of the rich got to stay home, safe on
> college deferments, while enjoying the pleasures of the working
> class girls, I have absolutely ZERO respect for the USA military.

Your utterly self-serving premise being that:

~ there is still an active draft

~ the military is run by the exact same people

~ the politicians of the day were not to blame

etc...

Well of course, you time-locked demonic shitbag, how could ANY of those
factors have change on the ensuing 50 years!

> I'd rather kill/die fighting AGAINST fascism than for fascism, and
> if you don't consider the above scenario fascism, then you don't
> know how to use the English language.

If you think Vietnam exists today as a national event you are sadly
delusional.

> At the same time, I acknowledge that the USA has an obligation to
> *all* veterans that is more sacred than any contract between two
> capitalist entities, one that transcends any concept of *property
> rights*.

WTF?

<BOGGLE>

That could be the most asinine conflation of disparate elements from you
EVER!

You're whacked in a way so utterly stupid that one can only laugh at
your feeble attempts at setting context.

I'd probably go to France, most there can speak English, I guess they can in Germany too.

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:12:57 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> This is the same old libitarded "chickenhawk" venom

You don't think Dick Cheney, a draft dodger, is the epitome of a
chicken hawk? He was all for war for one reason only: money.

--

sf

wrote:
> I'd probably go to France, most there can speak English, I guess they can in Germany too.
>
Both are overrun with toxic killer Muzzies, you'd be making a fool's
choice to do so.

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:12:57 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> This is the same old libitarded "chickenhawk" venom
>
> You don't think Dick Cheney, a draft dodger, is the epitome of a
> chicken hawk?

I think the term in and of itself is patently absurd, overtly hateful,
and fully emblematic of the rank hypocrisy of the left.

Was Clinton a "chickenhawk" for ordering our troops into Kosovo?

How about Woodrow Wilson for WWW1?

Mealy-mouthed Dems who always get rel military men to do their remote
control bidding think they can denigrate anyone else who doesn't follow
the same proxy-war schema.

They're sick people, to the core!

The Constitutional precedent for our very Commander in Chief to NOT need
to have served is historically established and tested.

No more need be said on such foolishly partisan, semantic inanities.

> He was all for war for one reason only: money.

That's simply a belief, not at all a proven fact.

On 1/7/2016 7:33 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Or any of 48 other states.
>
> -sw
You criminally STALK and ABUSE women, you sick little dwarfy man!

Here's what you did when you went all over the Usenet impersonating the
well-liked regular named "sf" and posting all her personal data on the
net against her will, including her:

* home address
* age
* cell phone number
* husband's name

etc.

YOU did that, you evil *******!

And then you had the hubris to actually GLOAT about in public saying:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4



She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.

-sw

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And before that you literally stalked poor Omelet, a local Auustin
favorite, right off the Usenet!

In your worst moment ever you actually begged her to KILL you:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
3/18/2011 3:49 PM
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com


Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then after having your nose rubbed in your filthy criminal stalking you
came back with, not an apology, nor the slightest remorse, just this:


"The facebook group is much more pleasant."


But we all know that's only because you cower over there in mortal fear
of being booted by the FB admins.

You're _so done_ here virus, I mean really ****ing done.

I'm making you a project like no other, expect a lot more of your evil
abuse and hatred to be aired for all to see here.

And we both know there's a google archive full of your hatred of women
just waiting to be hung out on the virtual clothesline to dry.

Enjoy then, you rotten, worthless misogynistic *******!

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:14:41 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:12:57 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >
> >> This is the same old libitarded "chickenhawk" venom
> >
> > You don't think Dick Cheney, a draft dodger, is the epitome of a
> > chicken hawk?
>
> I think the term in and of itself is patently absurd, overtly hateful,
> and fully emblematic of the rank hypocrisy of the left.
>
> Was Clinton a "chickenhawk" for ordering our troops into Kosovo?
>
> How about Woodrow Wilson for WWW1?

Did they do it with the sole purpose of enriching their former
employer, Halliburton?
>
> Mealy-mouthed Dems who always get rel military men to do their remote
> control bidding think they can denigrate anyone else who doesn't follow
> the same proxy-war schema.
>
> They're sick people, to the core!
>
> The Constitutional precedent for our very Commander in Chief to NOT need
> to have served is historically established and tested.
>
> No more need be said on such foolishly partisan, semantic inanities.
>
> > He was all for war for one reason only: money.
>
> That's simply a belief, not at all a proven fact.
>
You wouldn't admit it was true even if the facts slapped you in the
face and introduced personally themselves to you.


--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 10:14:41 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 09:12:57 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is the same old libitarded "chickenhawk" venom
>>>
>>> You don't think Dick Cheney, a draft dodger, is the epitome of a
>>> chicken hawk?
>>
>> I think the term in and of itself is patently absurd, overtly hateful,
>> and fully emblematic of the rank hypocrisy of the left.
>>
>> Was Clinton a "chickenhawk" for ordering our troops into Kosovo?
>>
>> How about Woodrow Wilson for WWW1?
>
> Did they do it with the sole purpose of enriching their former
> employer, Halliburton?

Did Clinton give North Korea nuclear power and promise they wouldn't
"misuse" it?

How'd that work out?

Did Clinton and Loral sell them nuclear hardened satellite guidance chips?

How's that going to work out?

Did Woodrow Wilson whore the US out to Yuropeon banksters with the
illegal Federal Reserve Act and then have to pay it off with our blood
in WW1?

Zimmerman Telegram anyone????

**** this insipid Halliburton canard!

Both Bush and Cheney's full asetts were held in BLIND TRUST!

Look it up.

You might also look up what HAL does today.

Hint - it ain't serving meals on wheels for our soldiers.

Do you ever do ANY in-depth political research?

Or is it just the same remasticated libitarded pabulum?

>> Mealy-mouthed Dems who always get rel military men to do their remote
>> control bidding think they can denigrate anyone else who doesn't follow
>> the same proxy-war schema.
>>
>> They're sick people, to the core!
>>
>> The Constitutional precedent for our very Commander in Chief to NOT need
>> to have served is historically established and tested.
>>
>> No more need be said on such foolishly partisan, semantic inanities.
>>
>>> He was all for war for one reason only: money.
>>
>> That's simply a belief, not at all a proven fact.
>>
> You wouldn't admit it was true even if the facts slapped you in the
> face and introduced personally themselves to you.

You couldn't begin to "slap me in the face" with "the facts" if you
actually took the time to look them up instead of regurgitating canned
liberal talking points!

Come on, I double dog dare ya!

Go for it!

Show us why every non military service President of the USA who ordered
a military action is a "chickenhawk"...

This should be good.

I'll make popcorn!

Oh and btw - one small point - Cheney was NOT our President, LOL!

On 9/1/2016 01:38 Gary wrote:

> cibola de oro wrote:
>>
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
>> > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
>> > maybe...
>>
>> Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?
>
> LOL! Call me a southern, roadkill-eating hillbilly then.
> I also got my haircut yesterday. It had been only a few days
> short of 7 months. Last haircut was last June 11.
>
> Needless to say, after the long overdue haircut, I finally feel
> like a member of society again. WHEW! In construction type
> work, haircuts are not required so I always let mine go longer
> than I should.
>
> I'm still happy with my hair after 4 months, but after that it starts
> to bug me a bit, slowly. I keep putting it off and putting it off. By
> the time I finally get to the barber, I don't care how they do...just
> cut it, please.
>
> And since I only go twice a year, I always tip them well so they are
> happy with the extra work they might have to do. Haircuts are $17
> there. I always give them $25. A good tip for them and a cheap price
> for me annually. $50 per year is cheap haircutting.

I once tried to go without a haircut for a year, but after 10 months I
had to go to a funeral...

--
Bruce

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:07:26 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

>
> Oh and btw - one small point - Cheney was NOT our President, LOL!
>
>
Only by proxy.

--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:07:26 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>>
>> Oh and btw - one small point - Cheney was NOT our President, LOL!
>>
>>
> Only by proxy.
>

Nice abandonment of all other claims.

So Gore was our Proxy Prez too, and Quail, etc...

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:28:11 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:07:26 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Oh and btw - one small point - Cheney was NOT our President, LOL!
> >>
> >>
> > Only by proxy.
> >
>
> Nice abandonment of all other claims.
>
Not worth continuing with you. He had more influence than you want to
acknowledge. I hope that man dies a slow, painful death and then goes
to Hell.

--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 16:28:11 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 12:07:26 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oh and btw - one small point - Cheney was NOT our President, LOL!
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Only by proxy.
>>>
>>
>> Nice abandonment of all other claims.
>>
> Not worth continuing with you.

Not when you have no factual rebuttals at hand, true.

The term "chickenhawk" is an invention of the left wing who have started
just as many wars as the right.

That merciless crip FDR managed to Pearl Harbor us into WW2 so we could
die en mass again for the bloodthirsty Yuropeons.

He had all the Japanese PH invasion intel and sat on it.

He's responsible /personally/ for every lost life in Pearl.

> He had more influence than you want to acknowledge.

I do not deny that he had Bush's ear, and the same for Rummy.

In fact Bush Sr. has come out now and slammed them both publicly.

Not that he was any peace-monger himself, with his fetid ambassador
April Glasspie carrying his lies right to Saddam's hot little ears:

"The US has no position on your border conflict with Kuwaitt.."
[paraphrase]

And this after our oilmen sold the Kuwaiti's loads of slant drilling
technology!

They ALL start profit wars, each end every one of the evil SOBs.

About how much money did Red Adair make from dousing each one of those
Kuwaiti oil wells Saddam torched off on hos way home?

Then Bush kow tows to NATO (allegedly) and begs off finishing the
murderous ******* off!

Thereby guaranteeing a future conflict...

You want some more Bush Sr. dirt, google "Zapata Oil".

> I hope that man dies a slow, painful death and then goes to Hell.

That's very likely given the hardware in his chest, or maybe not.

I figure he's par-died 3 or maybe 4 times already.

He may even be used to it by now.

Do your homework sf - don't bring me bones someone else has been chewing on.

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:12:31 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> About how much money did Red Adair make from dousing each one of those
> Kuwaiti oil wells Saddam torched off on hos way home?

Now Trump wants to bomb Iraq's oil fields, which means more oil fires.
Iraq isn't the problem, it's Saudi Arabia.

--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 17:12:31 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> About how much money did Red Adair make from dousing each one of those
>> Kuwaiti oil wells Saddam torched off on hos way home?
>
> Now Trump wants to bomb Iraq's oil fields, which means more oil fires.
> Iraq isn't the problem, it's Saudi Arabia.

Trump = Hitler = Mussolini.

America will embrace a megalomaniac and pay the price.

The problem isn't JUST The Saudis, it's the entire REGION!

Btw, Iraq has never signed that giveaway "deal".

Cogitate on that.

The "Great Race" is who nukes us first, them or the dog-eater Lil Kim.

So mote it be.

Maybe I could move to Brazil if I win?

On 2016-01-09 11:22 AM, wrote:
> Maybe I could move to Brazil if I win?
>

Sure. You will be able to afford a small army of body guards. You will
need one there.

wrote:
> Maybe I could move to Brazil if I win?
>
Or Paraguay...

Sqwertz wrote:
> 2.5 years of sucking up to each other is taking its toll on both of
> them.
>
> -sw
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Why do you even bother posting if that's all you have to say? We've
heard the same thing at least 2,000 times by now."

-sw

"OK, so it's your planet so I guess you get to define what all teens on
Planet Bove eat. We'll need to add this to the Planet Bove Wikipedia
entry: "Teenagers on Planet Bove only eat chicken strips, fries, and
baby carrots".

-sw

"Incredible. And you STILL don't shut up."

-sw

I thought you were here just to talk about cooking? You've only said
that at least 25 times, yet 95% of the flack you get is about
off-topic subjects.

-sw

Way to go, Julie! You beat her down into speechlessness.

-sw

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

On Fri, 08 Jan 2016 09:38:28 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>cibola de oro wrote:
>>
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
>> > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
>> > maybe...
>>
>> Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?
>
>LOL! Call me a southern, roadkill-eating hillbilly then.
>I also got my haircut yesterday. It had been only a few days
>short of 7 months. Last haircut was last June 11.
>
>Needless to say, after the long overdue haircut, I finally feel
>like a member of society again. WHEW! In construction type
>work, haircuts are not required so I always let mine go longer
>than I should.
>
>I'm still happy with my hair after 4 months, but after that it starts
>to bug me a bit, slowly. I keep putting it off and putting it off. By
>the time I finally get to the barber, I don't care how they do...just
>cut it, please.
>
>And since I only go twice a year, I always tip them well so they are
>happy with the extra work they might have to do. Haircuts are $17
>there. I always give them $25. A good tip for them and a cheap price
>for me annually. $50 per year is cheap haircutting.

Same amount I pay and tip. I get my hair cut at a local salon, like
95% female clientele and primarily seniors.... been going there more
than 12 years now. I like it because I can call Thursday morning at 9
AM and get an 11 AM appointment with Lynn, she works only Thursday and
Friday. Lynn is in her early 50s, a tall stringbean, flat as a
board... if she had bosoms I'd have my hair cut a lot more often.

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:03:03 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

wrote:
>> Maybe I could move to Brazil if I win?
>>
>Or Paraguay...

Or Da Bronx. . .

On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 10:02:04 PM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
> cibola de oro wrote:
> >
> > Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> > > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> > > maybe...
> >
> > Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?
>
> LOL! Call me a southern, roadkill-eating hillbilly then.
> I also got my haircut yesterday. It had been only a few days
> short of 7 months. Last haircut was last June 11.
>
> Needless to say, after the long overdue haircut, I finally feel
> like a member of society again. WHEW! In construction type
> work, haircuts are not required so I always let mine go longer
> than I should.
>
> I'm still happy with my hair after 4 months, but after that it starts
> to bug me a bit, slowly. I keep putting it off and putting it off. By
> the time I finally get to the barber, I don't care how they do...just
> cut it, please.
>
> And since I only go twice a year, I always tip them well so they are
> happy with the extra work they might have to do. Haircuts are $17
> there. I always give them $25. A good tip for them and a cheap price
> for me annually. $50 per year is cheap haircutting.

I've paid for two haircuts in the last 25 years. I cut my own, and
sometimes have my wife touch up the back a tiny bit.

--Bryan

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:03:03 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> wrote:
>>> Maybe I could move to Brazil if I win?
>>>
>> Or Paraguay...
>
> Or Da Bronx. . .
>
A good place to die maybe.

I decided on what to do if I hit the Powerball tonight.

I'm going to buy RFC. I'm going to be too busy with my money to run
things so I'll hire Casa Boner to be the moderator.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> I decided on what to do if I hit the Powerball tonight.
>
> I'm going to buy RFC. I'm going to be too busy with my money to run
> things so I'll hire Casa Boner to be the moderator.

lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> I decided on what to do if I hit the Powerball tonight.
>
> I'm going to buy RFC. I'm going to be too busy with my money to run
> things so I'll hire Casa Boner to be the moderator.

Gawd Bless you sir!

I'm ready and waiting to do my level best.

:-)))

On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 1:51:12 PM UTC-6, MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Friday, January 8, 2016 at 10:02:04 PM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
> > cibola de oro wrote:
> > >
> > > Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > > okay, I had my hair cut today... I'd
> > > > probably have my hair cut three times a year instead of just twice,
> > > > maybe...
> > >
> > > Lordy man, what are ya, a NY hillbilly?
> >
> > LOL! Call me a southern, roadkill-eating hillbilly then.
> > I also got my haircut yesterday. It had been only a few days
> > short of 7 months. Last haircut was last June 11.
> >
> > Needless to say, after the long overdue haircut, I finally feel
> > like a member of society again. WHEW! In construction type
> > work, haircuts are not required so I always let mine go longer
> > than I should.
> >
> > I'm still happy with my hair after 4 months, but after that it starts
> > to bug me a bit, slowly. I keep putting it off and putting it off. By
> > the time I finally get to the barber, I don't care how they do...just
> > cut it, please.
> >
> > And since I only go twice a year, I always tip them well so they are
> > happy with the extra work they might have to do. Haircuts are $17
> > there. I always give them $25. A good tip for them and a cheap price
> > for me annually. $50 per year is cheap haircutting.
>
> I've paid for two haircuts in the last 25 years. I cut my own, and
> sometimes have my wife touch up the back a tiny bit.
>
> --Bryan

Too cheap to pay a real professional. Same with your teeth, probably haven't been to a dentist for longer than that, judging by your fetid breath (as I recall)!! After all a Narcissistic Personality Disorder sufferer such as yourself can do everything as good or better than any professional! Right?

John Kuthe...