General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff


I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
white and slid to the other side of the pan.
I had hash browns with no egg this morning
The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
the carton for a week.
It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
Janet US
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 10:48:26 AM UTC-6, Janet B wrote:
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US


Bloody defective eggs!! Probably cheap Chinese JUNK!! ;-)

John Kuthe...
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 08:56:14 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe
> wrote:

>On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 10:48:26 AM UTC-6, Janet B wrote:
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>Bloody defective eggs!! Probably cheap Chinese JUNK!! ;-)
>
>John Kuthe...

Now that is an appropriate response
Janet US
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:31:52 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:48:19 -0700, Janet B wrote:
>
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>That's a new one. Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
>falls out.
>
>-sw

Absolutely. I should have taken a picture.
Janet US
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,744
Default Well, that was a turnoff


"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
>
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US


You gotta get back on that horse, so to speak. Do not let the trauma get
the better of you. March right into that kitchen and cook two eggs sunny
side up, pronto, or you may never be able to look another egg in the eye
ever again.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 09:54:06 -0800, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Janet B" > wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>You gotta get back on that horse, so to speak. Do not let the trauma get
>the better of you. March right into that kitchen and cook two eggs sunny
>side up, pronto, or you may never be able to look another egg in the eye
>ever again.
>
>

"Never be able to look another egg in the eye again?" Snork! LOL
That does it -- egg yolks will always be eyeballs
Janet US
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Well, that was a turnoff

Sqwertz wrote:
> That's a new one. Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
> falls out.
>
> -sw

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

"Why do you even bother posting if that's all you have to say? We've
heard the same thing at least 2,000 times by now."

-sw

"OK, so it's your planet so I guess you get to define what all teens on
Planet Bove eat. We'll need to add this to the Planet Bove Wikipedia
entry: "Teenagers on Planet Bove only eat chicken strips, fries, and
baby carrots".

-sw

"Incredible. And you STILL don't shut up."

-sw

I thought you were here just to talk about cooking? You've only said
that at least 25 times, yet 95% of the flack you get is about
off-topic subjects.

-sw

Way to go, Julie! You beat her down into speechlessness.

-sw

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++


  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,851
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/9/2016 11:48 AM, Janet B wrote:
>
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US
>


Never saw anything like that, but maybe your timing was perfect.

When you boil eggs the albumen becomes solid and the yolk, hard or soft
separates. I wonder if you tilted the pan when it just reached the
right temperature for them to part.

While it was a turnoff for you, it would have been the perfect egg for
me. I'd save the yolk for the last bite with a bite of buttery toast.
Yummmmm.
  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,676
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 11:31:52 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:48:19 -0700, Janet B wrote:
>
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>That's a new one. Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
>falls out.
>
>-sw


Well hopefully their glass eye
  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,744
Default Well, that was a turnoff


"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 1/9/2016 11:48 AM, Janet B wrote:
>>
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US
>>

>
> Never saw anything like that, but maybe your timing was perfect.
>
> When you boil eggs the albumen becomes solid and the yolk, hard or soft
> separates. I wonder if you tilted the pan when it just reached the right
> temperature for them to part.
>
> While it was a turnoff for you, it would have been the perfect egg for me.
> I'd save the yolk for the last bite with a bite of buttery toast. Yummmmm.


It's a sign of poor quality eggs. Chickens probably fed a poor diet. High
quality, fresh eggs just don't do that. Back in the day (before Big Egg
shut down our local chicken farms) I could get real, farm fresh eggs laid
that day, I had a hell of a time separating the yolks from the whites. You
could practically drop them into a skillet from 6 inches up and the yolk
would not break.

Miss those eggs.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 61,789
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:48:19 -0700, Janet B >
wrote:

>
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US


On the positive side, it didn't stink. :/

--

sf
  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:25:46 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:48:19 -0700, Janet B >
>wrote:
>
>>
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>On the positive side, it didn't stink. :/


well, yes, there is that
Janet US
  #13 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,627
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/9/2016 10:31 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
> falls out.
>
> -sw

You criminally STALK and ABUSE women, you sick little dwarfy man!

Here's what you did when you went all over the Usenet impersonating the
well-liked regular named "sf" and posting all her personal data on the
net against her will, including her:

* home address
* age
* cell phone number
* husband's name

etc.

YOU did that, you evil *******!

And then you had the hubris to actually GLOAT about in public saying:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4



She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.

-sw

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And before that you literally stalked poor Omelet, a local Auustin
favorite, right off the Usenet!

In your worst moment ever you actually begged her to KILL you:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
3/18/2011 3:49 PM
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com


Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Then after having your nose rubbed in your filthy criminal stalking you
came back with, not an apology, nor the slightest remorse, just this:


"The facebook group is much more pleasant."


But we all know that's only because you cower over there in mortal fear
of being booted by the FB admins.

You're _so done_ here virus, I mean really ****ing done.

I'm making you a project like no other, expect a lot more of your evil
abuse and hatred to be aired for all to see here.

And we both know there's a google archive full of your hatred of women
just waiting to be hung out on the virtual clothesline to dry.

Enjoy then, you rotten, worthless misogynistic *******!









  #14 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 676
Default Well, that was a turnoff

..
>>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>>> the carton for a week.
>>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>>> Janet US

..


Janet, approximately how old was the egg? I thought eggs would just
turn black after they have been in the frige a few years.

William

  #15 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,238
Default Well, that was a turnoff


Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.

N.


  #16 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:03:14 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
> wrote:

>
>Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
>had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.
>
>N.

The white was spread thinly all over half the pan and the yolk just
kept on rolling around -- intact. I was unable to capture it and I
did try. I occurred to me that the egg was very old or something and
probably would not taste good. Once that thought entered my mind I
couldn't eat it. I am seldom squeamish but that did turn me off.
Janet US
  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,609
Default Well, that was a turnoff


"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:03:14 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
>>had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.
>>
>>N.

> The white was spread thinly all over half the pan and the yolk just
> kept on rolling around -- intact. I was unable to capture it and I
> did try. I occurred to me that the egg was very old or something and
> probably would not taste good. Once that thought entered my mind I
> couldn't eat it. I am seldom squeamish but that did turn me off.
> Janet US


I'm with you there, if something in the food that makes me squeamish for
whatever reason, I don't eat it.

Cheri

  #18 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,425
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US


I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and fry for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be so lucky to ever get an egg like that!
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 3:52:36 PM UTC-6, Janet B wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:03:14 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
> >
> >Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
> >had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.
> >
> >N.

> The white was spread thinly all over half the pan and the yolk just
> kept on rolling around -- intact. I was unable to capture it and I
> did try. I occurred to me that the egg was very old or something and
> probably would not taste good. Once that thought entered my mind I
> couldn't eat it. I am seldom squeamish but that did turn me off.
> Janet US


I can understand that, an egg that does not behave like all the other eggs you're eaten in your life! Sumpin's WRONG with that egg! I agree, a yolk that is not adherant to all the albumin (egg whites) around it!! Probably old/bad egg!

I'd not risk a bunch of diarrhea from it!!

John Kuthe...
  #20 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:12:48 PM UTC-6, Janet B wrote:
> On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 15:25:46 -0800, sf > wrote:
>
> >On Sat, 09 Jan 2016 09:48:19 -0700, Janet B >
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> >> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> >> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> >> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> >> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> >> the carton for a week.
> >> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> >> Janet US

> >
> >On the positive side, it didn't stink. :/

>
> well, yes, there is that
> Janet US


But it was probably not long for/from stinking.

John Kuthe...


  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 1/9/2016 10:31 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
> > falls out.
> >
> > -sw

> You criminally STALK and ABUSE women, you sick little dwarfy man!
>
> Here's what you did when you went all over the Usenet impersonating the
> well-liked regular named "sf" and posting all her personal data on the
> net against her will, including her:
>
> * home address
> * age
> * cell phone number
> * husband's name
>
> etc.
>
> YOU did that, you evil *******!
>
> And then you had the hubris to actually GLOAT about in public saying:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ost
> >
> Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
> MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
>

>
>
> She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
> a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
> So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
> loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.
>
> -sw
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> And before that you literally stalked poor Omelet, a local Auustin
> favorite, right off the Usenet!
>
> In your worst moment ever you actually begged her to KILL you:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
ost
> >
> 3/18/2011 3:49 PM
> Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
> readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
> fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com
>
>
> Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.
>
> -sw
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
> There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Then after having your nose rubbed in your filthy criminal stalking you
> came back with, not an apology, nor the slightest remorse, just this:
>
>
> "The facebook group is much more pleasant."
>
>
> But we all know that's only because you cower over there in mortal fear
> of being booted by the FB admins.
>
> You're _so done_ here virus, I mean really ****ing done.
>
> I'm making you a project like no other, expect a lot more of your evil
> abuse and hatred to be aired for all to see here.
>
> And we both know there's a google archive full of your hatred of women
> just waiting to be hung out on the virtual clothesline to dry.
>
> Enjoy then, you rotten, worthless misogynistic *******!


You can stop copy/pasting that tripe anytime!!

John Kuthe...
  #22 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 252
Default Well, that was a turnoff

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 11:01:02 AM UTC-6, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 1/9/2016 10:31 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Kinda like talking to somebody and their eyeball
>>> falls out.
>>>
>>> -sw

>> You criminally STALK and ABUSE women, you sick little dwarfy man!
>>
>> Here's what you did when you went all over the Usenet impersonating the
>> well-liked regular named "sf" and posting all her personal data on the
>> net against her will, including her:
>>
>> * home address
>> * age
>> * cell phone number
>> * husband's name
>>
>> etc.
>>
>> YOU did that, you evil *******!
>>
>> And then you had the hubris to actually GLOAT about in public saying:
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ost
>> >
>> Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
>> MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4
>>

>>
>>
>> She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
>> a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
>> So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
>> loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.
>>
>> -sw
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> And before that you literally stalked poor Omelet, a local Auustin
>> favorite, right off the Usenet!
>>
>> In your worst moment ever you actually begged her to KILL you:
>>
>> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
ost
>> >
>> 3/18/2011 3:49 PM
>> Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
>> readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
>> fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com
>>
>>
>> Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.
>>
>> -sw
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
>> There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Then after having your nose rubbed in your filthy criminal stalking you
>> came back with, not an apology, nor the slightest remorse, just this:
>>
>>
>> "The facebook group is much more pleasant."
>>
>>
>> But we all know that's only because you cower over there in mortal fear
>> of being booted by the FB admins.
>>
>> You're _so done_ here virus, I mean really ****ing done.
>>
>> I'm making you a project like no other, expect a lot more of your evil
>> abuse and hatred to be aired for all to see here.
>>
>> And we both know there's a google archive full of your hatred of women
>> just waiting to be hung out on the virtual clothesline to dry.
>>
>> Enjoy then, you rotten, worthless misogynistic *******!

>
> You can stop copy/pasting that tripe anytime!!


One can, but as long as that woman-stalker is here one WILL NOT!

> John Kuthe...


Now you need to do some soul-searching and ask yourself, why do you
support a criminal woman-stalker?

What does that say about what and who YOU are?

Think about it.

  #23 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 4:32:08 PM UTC-6, Groupkillas wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:

....
> One can, but as long as that woman-stalker is here one WILL NOT!
>
> > John Kuthe...

>
> Now you need to do some soul-searching and ask yourself, why do you
> support a criminal woman-stalker?
>
> What does that say about what and who YOU are?
>
> Think about it.


I respond to posts mostly on what's posted, like I am with you right now SOCK PUPPET and nomally carry no history for posters. Not too much not too often.

Posts are NOT real life! Neither are you!

John Kuthe...
  #24 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 867
Default Well, that was a turnoff

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 4:32:08 PM UTC-6, Groupkillas wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:

> ...
>> One can, but as long as that woman-stalker is here one WILL NOT!
>>
>>> John Kuthe...

>>
>> Now you need to do some soul-searching and ask yourself, why do you
>> support a criminal woman-stalker?
>>
>> What does that say about what and who YOU are?
>>
>> Think about it.

>
> I respond to posts mostly on what's posted,


So you'd talk to Tim McVeigh if he were posting here?

How about Terry Nichols?

> like I am with you right now SOCK PUPPET and nomally carry no history for posters.


How conveient!

It's like having no conscience at all!

> Not too much not too often.


Of course...


> Posts are NOT real life!

So what are they?

Was it "real life" when Wertz posted all sf's personal data and then
admitted to it?

> Neither are you!
>
> John Kuthe...


Oh I'm real ll right, real enough you best watch your insolent yap,
pipsqueak.

  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,677
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 5:44:32 PM UTC-6, cibola de oro wrote:
> John Kuthe wrote:
> > On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 4:32:08 PM UTC-6, Groupkillas wrote:
> >> John Kuthe wrote:

> > ...
> >> One can, but as long as that woman-stalker is here one WILL NOT!
> >>
> >>> John Kuthe...
> >>
> >> Now you need to do some soul-searching and ask yourself, why do you
> >> support a criminal woman-stalker?
> >>
> >> What does that say about what and who YOU are?
> >>
> >> Think about it.

> >
> > I respond to posts mostly on what's posted,

>
> So you'd talk to Tim McVeigh if he were posting here?
>
> How about Terry Nichols?

....

Of course, they would just be posters on the Internet, all equal until demonstrated otherwise! I;ve been on the Internet since before there was a WWW!! That's right, I remember the development of the Web!! And Usenet was almost dead! :-)

John Kuthe...


  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14,609
Default Well, that was a turnoff


"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
> I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and fry
> for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be so
> lucky to ever get an egg like that!


========

I saw Martha Stewart cook two part eggs something like that, cooking the
white first and then putting the yolk on it.

Cheri

  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,425
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 2:40:57 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
> ...
> > On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
> >> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> >> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> >> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> >> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> >> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> >> the carton for a week.
> >> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> >> Janet US

> >
> > I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and fry
> > for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be so
> > lucky to ever get an egg like that!

>
> ========
>
> I saw Martha Stewart cook two part eggs something like that, cooking the
> white first and then putting the yolk on it.
>
> Cheri


It might be a good idea. I'll bet I can roll that yolk off the whites - all I have to do is tilt that pan. That sounds like it could be fun!
  #28 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,238
Default Well, that was a turnoff

Janet, I do understand not wanting to eat an egg that split and tried to escape.
It was likely telling you something.....;-))

N.
  #29 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,698
Default Well, that was a turnoff

I don't like to make Jello cooked lemon pudding because you have to only use the yolk, I guess to make meranque from the white.
  #30 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,764
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 11/1/2016 11:38 John Kuthe wrote:

> On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 5:44:32 PM UTC-6, cibola de oro wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>> > On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 4:32:08 PM UTC-6, Groupkillas wrote:
>> >> John Kuthe wrote:
>> > ...
>> >> One can, but as long as that woman-stalker is here one WILL NOT!
>> >>
>> >>> John Kuthe...
>> >>
>> >> Now you need to do some soul-searching and ask yourself, why do you
>> >> support a criminal woman-stalker?
>> >>
>> >> What does that say about what and who YOU are?
>> >>
>> >> Think about it.
>> >
>> > I respond to posts mostly on what's posted,

>>
>> So you'd talk to Tim McVeigh if he were posting here?
>>
>> How about Terry Nichols?

> ...
>
> Of course, they would just be posters on the Internet, all equal until demonstrated otherwise! I;ve been on the Internet since before there was a WWW!! That's right, I remember the development of the Web!! And Usenet was almost dead! :-)


Ok, an I've been on the Internet since-off.

--
Bruce


  #31 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,778
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/9/2016 11:48 AM, Janet B wrote:
>
> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> the carton for a week.
> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> Janet US
>

That sounds weird. Why do you think that happened? I'm not sure I
wouldn't have eaten it though. Unless I know why it happened and the why
was gross. LOL

--
ღ.¸¸.œ«*¨`*œ¶
Cheryl
  #32 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 16:57:49 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
> wrote:

>Janet, I do understand not wanting to eat an egg that split and tried to escape.
>It was likely telling you something.....;-))
>
>N.


Oh,no! Did I mistake a visiting alien and kill it? I never gave it a
chance to talk or write. I may have changed the history of human
relationship with Ancient Aliens.
Janet US
  #33 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,438
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:13:44 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> the carton for a week.
>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> Janet US

>
>I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and fry for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be so lucky to ever get an egg like that!


this white wasn't flipable. It was very watery and thin. It was
un-nerving the way the yolk rolled around like one of those balls with
a weight inside.
Janet US
  #34 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/10/2016 12:13 PM, William wrote:
> .
>>>> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>>>> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>>>> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>>>> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>>>> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>>>> the carton for a week.
>>>> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>>>> Janet US

> .
>
>
> Janet, approximately how old was the egg? I thought eggs would just
> turn black after they have been in the frige a few years.
>
> William
>

A few years?! She said she bought them a week ago. I'm sure Janet is
saavy enough to check the best buy date on a carton of eggs. I'd say it
was a fluke or just very interesting timing.

Me, I'd probably have tried to quickly slide the yolk back into the
white (gently!) before either set further. Maybe she *could* have put
Humpty Dumpty back together again. We'll never know.

Jill
  #35 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/10/2016 4:03 PM, Nancy2 wrote:
>
> Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
> had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.
>
> N.
>

That's very true unless the skillet was perhaps very hot and the whites
set faster than she could move the yolk. It sounds like Janet was quite
surprised, wondering how on earth the separation could have happened. I
mentioned in another reply, probably just freakish timing.

Jill


  #36 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/10/2016 5:09 PM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "Janet B" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 13:03:14 -0800 (PST), Nancy2
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why couldn't you have pulled the white and yolk back together and still
>>> had an egg for breakfast? I don't get it.
>>>
>>> N.

>> The white was spread thinly all over half the pan and the yolk just
>> kept on rolling around -- intact. I was unable to capture it and I
>> did try. I occurred to me that the egg was very old or something and
>> probably would not taste good. Once that thought entered my mind I
>> couldn't eat it. I am seldom squeamish but that did turn me off.
>> Janet US

>
> I'm with you there, if something in the food that makes me squeamish for
> whatever reason, I don't eat it.
>
> Cheri


I agree about the squeamish part.

Janet said in her original post she'd just bought the carton a week ago.
Could one egg in the same carton, with the same date stamp, be that
disparate in age from the ones that cooked fine?

I hope Janet lets us know if it happens again with [if any] remaining
eggs from that carton. I'd sure be curious.

Jill
  #37 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 36,804
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On 1/10/2016 9:09 PM, Janet B wrote:
> this white wasn't flipable. It was very watery and thin. It was
> un-nerving the way the yolk rolled around like one of those balls with
> a weight inside.
> Janet US
>

I agree, the white sounds disgusting. Your description of the yolk
sounds like one of the rolling ball toys my cat Buffy plays with. It's
called a golf ball.

Perhaps this particular cooking turnoff should be called "The Golf". <G>

Jill
  #38 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,425
Default Well, that was a turnoff

On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 4:09:53 PM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 14:13:44 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <>
> wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
> >> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
> >> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
> >> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
> >> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
> >> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
> >> the carton for a week.
> >> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
> >> Janet US

> >
> >I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and fry for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be so lucky to ever get an egg like that!

>
> this white wasn't flipable. It was very watery and thin. It was
> un-nerving the way the yolk rolled around like one of those balls with
> a weight inside.
> Janet US


Say wait a minute - that is disgusting.
  #39 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,730
Default Well, that was a turnoff



"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, January 10, 2016 at 2:40:57 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>> "dsi1" <> wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Saturday, January 9, 2016 at 6:48:26 AM UTC-10, Janet B wrote:
>> >> I'd just put my breakfast egg into the pan and tilted the pan a bit to
>> >> get the butter around the egg and the yolk totally separated from the
>> >> white and slid to the other side of the pan.
>> >> I had hash browns with no egg this morning
>> >> The rest of the eggs had stood up nicely in the pan. I've only had
>> >> the carton for a week.
>> >> It's going to be awhile before I have eggs for breakfast again.
>> >> Janet US
>> >
>> > I wish I could do that with my eggs. I'd flip that white part over and
>> > fry
>> > for thirty seconds then plate it and plop the yoke on top. I should be
>> > so
>> > lucky to ever get an egg like that!

>>
>> ========
>>
>> I saw Martha Stewart cook two part eggs something like that, cooking the
>> white first and then putting the yolk on it.
>>
>> Cheri

>
> It might be a good idea. I'll bet I can roll that yolk off the whites -
> all I have to do is tilt that pan. That sounds like it could be fun!


Good luck with that if the eggs are very fresh



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

  #40 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.cooking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,730
Default Well, that was a turnoff



"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
> Janet, I do understand not wanting to eat an egg that split and tried to
> escape.
> It was likely telling you something.....;-))


Perhaps, like me, she doesn't understand egg speak ;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Your Biggest "People eating..." Turnoff? Lou Decruss General Cooking 0 05-01-2012 09:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"