um yep, you summed up "chung the dung" pretty well
but hey.. STOP CROSS POSTING

or all you THAT stupid?
--
RK - t1
*Disclaimer: i'm not a doctor. I only share personal
experience of being a diabetic. I have no textbook
learning, only life itself.
----------------------
In tribute to the United States of America and the State
of Israel, two bastions of strength in a world filled with strife and
terrorism.

"rmg" > wrote in message
. com...
:
: I find the below message offensive.
:
: Usenet is here so people can quickly reference topics and communities of
: interest. By cross posting, you are undermining a system that is working
for
: a lot of well-meaning people. You are rude and your ignorant sense of
: entitlement is offensive.
:
:
: "Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
: news:1100201484.oI57DgQUtD6ntH1vgOzcpQ@teranews...
: > wrote:
: >
: >> George wrote:
: >> > Zee it is pretty anyoying that you change your posting name
: >> constantly
: >> > to slip past people's kill filters.
: >> >
: >> > I know you think your message is life saving but there are many who
: >> > find your posts annoying.
: >> >
: >> > Stick to one posting name and keep it please. You will be doing
: >> > everyone a favor. Those that want to read your stuff will see it,
: >> and
: >> > htose of us who don't will be spared.
: >>
: >> George
: >>
: >> I am not changing my handle to slip past kill files. I would *never* do
: >> that, just as I do not kill file or use an untraceable, unreal posting
: >> name. George. All my posting accounts are real. George at nowhere.com.
: >> But the name in all of them is Zee.
: >>
: >> If you want to effectively kill file me use Zee, or you ou could also
: >> try despammed. Or just don't open my posts George.
: >>
: >
: > That could be said of any post here on Usenet. Yet there are those who
: > claim to be offended by their being forced to read what you (or I)
write.
: > They also tend to be the same people who moments before broadcast that
: > they
: > have killfiled you (or me) and how the world seems to be a much better
: > place (to them).
: >
: > This comes back to your earlier request that I not broadcast your posts
to
: > the other groups that I now regularly crosspost to by choice out of
: > "saltiness." Presumably this is because you do not want to offend
people
: > who complain vociferously about being forced to read something they do
not
: > want to read. People like George. You and I (and others) know that the
: > true reason for their complaints is *not* because they are forced to
read
: > what you (or I) write but because they do not like the fact that there
: > clearly are others who *are* reading what you (or I) are writing. These
: > people email their support to you (and me) and so we continue to be
openly
: > public about our respective causes. Yours is to inform people about
: > statins (mine is to inform people about satan).
: >
: > Yes, my love for you is unconditional and will not change because of
what
: > you either write, say, or do.
: >
: > May your love be similarly unconditional though you may need Christ to
: > help
: > you be this way (I know I do).
: >
: >>
: >> Absolutely no intention of irritating you George or forcing what I have
: >> to say on you or trying to slip past your kill file: I didn't know you
: >> used one, didn't know it applied to me, don't know how they work. I
: >> post onto the web, on Google 2: completely upfront George, completely
: >> traceable. No re-routers for me.
: >>
: >
: > None for me either.
: >
: >>
: >> I am Zee.
: >>
: >
: > I am Andrew.
: >
: >>
: >> Read here for why I do this. Switched to badant to make sure you get
: >> this link. Then, from now on George. Ignore me. But first read this.
: >> It's not about statins.
: >>
: >
: > Actually, it is related to statins.
: >
: >>
: >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
: >>
: >> http://tinyurl.com/56yb3
: >>
: >> "I received e-mails from someone who disagrees with my point of view,
: >> and with whom I have had heated discussion. His name landed in my mail
: >> box frequently. One day I clicked on it and set off the virus
: >> protection system that ate Tokyo. I deleted it. But more came from the
: >> same person. All carrying viruses. So I began to trace the e-mail
: >> address. It was quite complex. I had help. The trace took me to
: >> Pharmacia, told me to wait a few seconds and I would be re-directed to
: >> the new website, and then the new website
: >> opened.
: >>
: >> "Welcome to Pfizer." Pharmacia had about that time been aquired by
: >> Pfizer, at least in Europe, where many of this person's computer's
: >> traced to. I did it several times, with all the computers that person
: >> uses; each traced to Pfizer. I let him know, and I have not seen him
: >> posting again. I'd know. He was definitely not Listener.
: >>
: >> So. I am Zee. No matter what REAL e-mail address I use. I am Zee."
: >> Zee
: >
: > And I remain Andrew (also with real email addresses) with nearly 9 years
: > of
: > Usenet posts (15,600) behind my name :-)
: >
: > It is written in Ephesians 2:
: >
: > 10For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good
works,
: > which God prepared in advance for us to do.
: >
: > All is a waste of time until you find the way to eternal life with the
: > Creator of the universe. When you do, there is no waste of time because
: > there will be an infinite amount of it. Walking about aimlessly
thinking
: > it is *your* time, *your* money, *your* lot, *your* labor, *your*
profit,
: > and *your* power that you are using is tantamount to self-worship.
: >
: > For Christ provides "the way" through John 14:
: >
: > 6Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes
to
: > the Father except through me..."
: >
: > This bring us back again to the following very simple decision tree for
: > the
: > undiscerning such as yourself, Zee, still groping around in the "dark"
: > with
: > logic:
: >
: > (1) Accept Christ.
: > Risk: Nothing.
: >
: > Benefits: Salvation, purposeful life, eternal life, unimaginable riches
in
: > God's eternal kingdom.
: >
: > (2) Reject Christ.
: > Risk: Eternal separation from God. Eternal torment of your soul by
satan.
: >
: > Benefits: Nothing.
: >
: > Again, one has to conclude that those (ie you, Carey, Steve, Bob,
George,
: > Frank, Hawki, Don et al) who would reject Christ have not thought out
: > their
: > decision *logically*.
: >
: > Would suggest you cast a glance at tragic Bob Pastorio as a special
: > example
: > of illogically eloquent self-worship (BTW, Bob remains in my prayers out
: > of
: > Christian love) who is being driven to madness by my ignoring him. The
: > power is all God's and not mine. All praises to Him Whom I love with
all
: > my heart, soul, mind, and strength :-)
: >
: > You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Christ's holy
: > name.
: >
: > May you accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
: > you too will escape satan's rule and torment of your soul after you die.
: >
: > Please do consider the following as your logic should dictate before it
is
: > too late:
: >
: > http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
: >
: > (Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
: > the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
: > is
: > a number between 1 to 9 :-)
: >
: >
: > Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
: >
: > Andrew
: >
: > --
: > Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
: > Board-Certified Cardiologist
: > http://www.heartmdphd.com/
: >
: > **
: > Who is the humblest person in the universe?
: > http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
: >
: > What is all this about?
: > http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48
: >
: > Is this spam?
: > http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
: >
: >
: >
:
:

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:40:24 GMT, "rmg"
> Screamed something into the void
that sounded like:

>
>I find the below message offensive.
>
>Usenet is here so people can quickly reference topics and communities of
>interest. By cross posting, you are undermining a system that is working for
>a lot of well-meaning people. You are rude and your ignorant sense of
>entitlement is offensive.
>
>

here is some info publicly available about chung the psychol troll:



Chung, A B
6041 Colt Ridge Trl SE
Mableton, GA 30126-5715
(404) 699-2780


Domain Name: HEARTMDPHD.COM
Registrar: TUCOWS INC.
Whois Server: whois.opensrs.net
Referral URL: http://domainhelp.tucows.com
Name Server: NS3.SOFTCOMCA.COM
Name Server: NS4.SOFTCOMCA.COM
Status: ACTIVE
Updated Date: 18-nov-2003
Creation Date: 01-jan-2001
Expiration Date: 01-jan-2011

go to map quest or expedia maps and enter the above address to visit
chung at his office.


---------------------------------
| The Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD FAQ |
| Version 1.0, January, 2004 |
---------------------------------

Introduction
------------
New people arriving in sci.med.cardiology (s.m.c.) are often puzzled
and troubled by the controversy surrounding the poster who posts as
Dr.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD (Dr. Chung) and want to know what the
controversy is about. This FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) attempts
to provide an answer.

The FAQ is arranged in typical FAQ form, i.e. a series of questions
and
answers. For those who don¹t wish to read the whole FAQ, the
following
summary is provided.

Summary
-------
Dr. Chung represents himself to be a licensed physician specializing
in
cardiology. In this capacity he responds to medical questions on
s.m.c.. If that were all he did, there would probably be no
controversy.

The controversy arises from Dr. Chung¹s other behaviors on s.m.c., in
particular:

o He uses s.m.c. to not only proselytize his particular
interpretation
of Christianity, but also to disparage and attack anyone with a
different interpretation or different religion.

o He uses s.m.c. to promote his unscientific Two Pound Diet (2PD)
and,
in fact, cross posts this information to other groups in order to
gain more exposure.

o When challenged on the above issues, or one of his medical
opinions,
he attacks his challengers as "obsessive anti-Christians",
"libelers", "homosexuals", "people who can¹t understand English",
etc.

o When challenged he performs Internet searches on his challengers in
order to "get the dirt" on them and smear their reputations.

o When challenged, he answers with evasions, non sequiturs,
dissembling, rhetorical questions, quotes from the bible, religious
mantras, thinly veiled death threats, ad hominem arguments, and
other
such disreputable, unethical, and unprofessional tactics.

o He is insufferably full of himself, claiming to have "the gift of
Truth Discernment" and to be "Humble" while behaving anything but
humbly.

o He uses a foil who posts under variations of the name "Mu" to avoid
killfiles. Mu¹s job is to troll other newsgroups and, when he gets
a reaction, to cross post the reaction to s.m.c. so that Dr. Chung
can disingenuously claim to be "only responding" to a cross post.
Whereas Dr. Chung has to be somewhat careful what he says and so
attacks primarily through insinuation and innuendo, Mu¹s tactics
are blunt and direct like those of a playground bully.

The above lists only the highlights of Dr. Chung¹s egregious behavior
on s.m.c.. If anything, it understates it. Everything can be
verified
in the Google archives.

The issue then arises: so what? As long as Dr. Chung provides free
medical advice on s.m.c., who cares what else he does?

Many people provide free medical advice on the internet. How does
one
know whether it is good advice or bad advice? If the person giving
the
advice is, or represents himself to be, a doctor shouldn¹t that be
enough? Unfortunately, no.

Medical education alone is not enough to guarantee good advice.
Knowledge must be tempered with judgment, impartiality, integrity,
ethics, and professionalism. If someone consistently demonstrates by
their behavior that they lack these qualities, how much credence
should
be given to their medical advice?

People arrive in this group looking for help. For their own
protection, they deserve to know the quality of the person purporting
to dispense that help and not be lulled into a false sense of
security
simply because someone displays an MD after their name. It is the
intention of this FAQ to provide people with enough information to
allow them to make an informed decision.

List of Questions Answered
--------------------------
1. Who is Dr. Andrew B Chung, MD/PhD?
2. What is the Charter of s.m.c.?
3. Aren¹t Religious Discussions Covered by the Charter?
4. So Dr. Chung is Religious... What¹s the Problem With That?
5. But it¹s Just a Little "Tag Line" in His Signature.
6. But I¹m a Christian Too!
7. Well, Why Not Just Ignore His Religious Rants?
8. But Isn¹t It Wonderful That Dr. Chung Offers This Free
Medical Advice Out of the Goodness of His Heart?
9. How Does a Practicing Physician Find so Much Time to Spend on
Usenet?
10. Won¹t Challenging Dr. Chung Drive People Away?
11. Doesn't the "Fault" for all Those Posts Lay With Those Who
Challenge Dr. Chung?
12. Why Do I see So Many "Ad Hominem" Attacks?
13. I'm Sick of Seeing All This!
14. What is the Two Pound Diet?
15. Is Discussion of the Two Pound Diet "On Topic"?
16. Who is Mu?
17. What is Mu¹s Role?


1. Who is Dr. Andrew B Chung, MD/PhD?
--------------------------------------
The poster who posts as Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD claims to be a
licensed physician, practicing internal medicine in Atlanta, Georgia,
USA and specializing in cardiology. His signature contains a link to
a
website which is consistent with his posts.

It should be noted that anyone can claim to be anyone on Usenet and
so
caution is always advised. Indeed there are those who claim that the
poster in question is not Dr. Andrew B. Chung, or is not the Dr.
Andrew
B. Chung listed in the Atlanta telephone directory, and/or has lost
his
license and/or hospital privileges for misconduct. This FAQ does not
attempt to address those claims one way or the other. The reader
with
an interest in these matters can easily find the relevant discussions
archived in Google Groups.

This FAQ deals with the poster who posts as Dr. Chung and restricts
itself to issues demonstrated by those posts. No position is taken
on
his "true" identity.

2. What is the Charter of s.m.c.?
----------------------------------
The purpose of this newsgroup is to establish electronic media for
communication between health care providers, scientists and other
individuals with interest in the cardiovascular field. Such
communications will provide quick and efficacious means to exchange
information and knowledge, and offer problems to solutions.

The sci.med.cardiology newsgroup will welcome participants who are
health care providers, trainees, researchers, students or recipients
with interest in the field of cardiovascular problems."


(ftp://ftp.uu.net/usenet/news.announc...med.cardiology)


3. Aren¹t Religious Discussions Covered by the Charter?
--------------------------------------------------------
What do you think?

4. So Dr. Chung is Religious... What¹s the Problem With That?
--------------------------------------------------------------
There is no problem with that. Most of the people who participate in
s.m.c. are probably religious. However no one but Dr. Chung feels
compelled to characterize themselves as the "Humble Servant of God"
in
their signatures, continually thank God for the opportunity to
"witness", question others about their religious beliefs, claim the
"Gift of Truth Discernment", etc.

When one person insists on introducing his personal religious
interpretations into the discussions, it naturally generates
responses
from others who feel just as strongly that their viewpoints are
correct. The resulting debate easily swirls out of control,
especially
given Dr. Chung¹s intolerant and dismissive attitude towards beliefs
which differ from his. The situation is further exacerbated by Mu¹s
rabble raising from the sidelines.

There are over 160 Usenet groups dedicated to the discussion of
religion. Dr. Chung should take his beliefs to one of these and
stick
to cardiology in s.m.c. It is a simple matter of respect for others.

5. But it¹s Just a Little "Tag Line" in His Signature.
-------------------------------------------------------
No, it is not. He has even gone so far as to "investigate" someone
asking for advice about stents and accuse her of being
anti-Christian.

6. But I¹m a Christian Too!
----------------------------
Lots of people are Christians. There is a time and a place for
everything. s.m.c. isn¹t the place to "witness" or recruit. In
addition, lots of other people are Jews, Moslems, Buddhists,
Taoists, Hindus, etc. Would s.m.c. be better or worse if they
all emulated Dr. Chung in their proselytizing and recruiting?

Furthermore, if you are a Christian, you should be appalled by Dr.
Chung¹s pharisaical, cynical, and manipulative use of Christianity.
He
is truly a "whitened sepulcher", loudly proclaiming his adherence to
Christian values while overtly lying, carrying on smear campaigns
against others, making false accusations, dissembling, and marketing
his web site under the guise of altruism. He is "bearing false
witness" and true Christians should be concerned.

As an example, when John Ritter recently died unexpectedly, Dr. Chung
rushed to use this unfortunate event to market his web site. He
showed
a total lack of Christian compassion for Mr. Ritter and his family,
even when challenged to do so.

As another example, he recently choreographed a smear campaign
against
a poster who had criticized him. Dr. Chung found a homosexual author
with the same first name and then insinuated that the poster and
anyone
who agreed with him were engaged in a homosexual relationship. Ask
yourself if this the brand of Christianity you identify with.

7. Well, Why Not Just Ignore His Religious Rants?
--------------------------------------------------
Why should one individual be given carte blanche to violate the
rights
of everyone else? Usenet is a community. It is up to the community
to
sanction its members. There is nothing "ad hominem" about
challenging
inappropriate and antisocial behavior.

8. But Isn¹t It Wonderful That Dr. Chung Offers This Free
Medical Advice Out of the Goodness of His Heart?
----------------------------------------------------------
First, it is only of value if it is good advice. Medical education
alone is not enough to guarantee good advice. Knowledge must be
tempered with judgment, impartiality, integrity, ethics, and
professionalism. If someone consistently demonstrates by their
behavior that they lack these qualities, how much credence should be
given to their medical advice?

Secondly, despite his protestations to the contrary, Dr. Chung is not
simply motivated by altruism. Every post of Dr. Chung's contains a
link to a website with the following quote:

"If you are looking for a cardiologist and reside in Georgia,
please consider me your best option for a personal heart advocate.
Check out my credentials and my background. Additional information
is available in the protected sections of this web site. Email me
at
to me of your interest and I may send
you a temporary username and password to allow a preview. The more
information you email, the more likely my decision to send you a
temporary username and password. If you like what you see and
learn
from this website and wish to confer with me about your heart, you
or your doctor should email me privately or call my voicemail at
404-699-2780 to schedule an appointment to see me at my *real*
office."
(http://www.heartmdphd.com/office.asp)



Thirdly, Dr. Chung has repeatedly stated that one of his key
motivations for participating is s.m.c. is to "witness" and win
converts to his religious beliefs.

9. How Does a Practicing Physician Find so Much Time to Spend on
Usenet?
------------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting question.

10. Won¹t Challenging Dr. Chung Drive People Away?
--------------------------------------------------
Perhaps. But not challenging him will drive others away.

s.m.c. is historically a "low traffic" group. Therefore, when Dr.
Chung
misbehaves, he generates an apparently large response. This is
compounded by Dr. Chung¹s need to "get in the last word" and Mu¹s
provocations. In spite of this, if someone has a question it will
usually be answered.

Dr. Chung is not the only participant who offers advice in s.m.c. He
is not even the only doctor who participates in s.m.c. However, the
controversy he generates and sustains often makes it appear that he
is
the "only game in town".

Finally, Dr. Chung himself drives others away including other
physicians who leave in disgust after being verbally assaulted by
him,
and other knowledgeable posters who point out where Dr. Chung¹s
medical
opinion might be in error or at least not the only one generally
held.
Anyone disagreeing with Dr. Chung on any subject can expect a series
of
increasingly vitriolic attacks, including threats of libel suits.

11. Doesn't the "Fault" for all Those Posts Lay With Those Who
Challenge Dr. Chung?
--------------------------------------------------------------
An interesting perspective: blame the victim. No other poster
(with the exception of Mu, of course) introduces religion or
the Two Pound Diet. How can it be acceptable for Dr. Chung
to introduce these topics, but not acceptable for others to
respond?

In any thread, someone must, of necessity "get the last word".
Dr. Chung has amply demonstrated that he will not be outdone
in this respect.

12. Why Do I see So Many "Ad Hominem" Attacks?
----------------------------------------------
You are probably referring to an "Ad Hominem" _argument_, which
attempts to disprove an adversary's fact by personal attack on
the adversary. An example would be "You are opposed to the
Two Pound Diet because you are anti-Christian".

When someone misbehaves, for example lies or distorts what
someone else is saying, it is not an "ad hominem attack" to
call them on it. It is a legitimate social sanction.

There are also, unfortunately too often, simple personal
attacks and insults on both sides. While we can all wish
it weren't so, it is simply human nature when an argument
becomes heated or the other person is obviously not arguing
in good faith. If you are distressed by this, see the next
question.

13. I'm Sick of Seeing All This!
--------------------------------
There is no reason why you have to see it. Just as you can
change the TV channel if you don't like a show, you can killfile
a poster or thread you don't want to see. See the manual
that came with your Usenet reader for directions on how to do it.

Before you do this, however, you may wish to consider if a truer
picture of the world is not gained by seeing all that goes on -
both the good and the bad.

14. What is the Two Pound Diet?
-------------------------------
The Two pound Diet is a diet which Dr. Chung "invented". It¹s only
rule is to restrict yourself to two pounds of food per day. That¹s
it.
Doesn¹t matter if you are a 16 year old girl or an 80 year old man; a
5¹ 2" woman or a 7¹ man; a weight lifter or a mattress tester. Two
pounds. That¹s it. No more, less if you want. One size fits all.

Oh, and the food? Whatever you want: two pounds of lettuce, two
pounds
of ice cream, two pounds of celery, two pounds of bacon, two pounds
of
chocolate, two pounds of peanuts... doesn¹t matter. Mix and match.
Just keep it under two pounds.

Dr. Chung¹s claim is that this magical weight of food, this universal
gustatory constant will cause everyone to arrive at and maintain
their
ideal weight. His scientific basis for this claim: none. The proof
he
offers: none. Studies supporting this claim: none. Nutritional
explanation: none. Metabolic explanation: none.

And this from a doctor who expects people to take him seriously on
other issues.

15. Is Discussion of the Two Pound Diet "On Topic"?
---------------------------------------------------
Dr. Chung says it is because being overweight is a risk factor for
heart problems and therefore discussion of the Two Pound Diet is On
Topic. However criticism of the Two Pound Diet is Off Topic as is
discussion of any other diet.

As with religion, Dr. Chung takes every opportunity to introduce the
Two Pound Diet (2PD) into any other thread. In addition Mu trolls
other newsgroups, particularly the diet groups looking for
opportunities to introduce the 2PD in these groups and then cross
post
the resulting discussion back to s.m.c so that Dr. Chung can
disingenuously claim to be "only responding" to a cross post.

Since Dr. Chung and Mu have been laughed off of these other groups
and
have been asked repeatedly not to bring up the 2PD in them,
participants of these groups are understandably angered when it
happens
yet againŠ and, because of Mu¹s cross-posting, all their anger spills
back into s.m.c.

Another reason for ongoing 2PD discussions is Dr. Chung¹s habit of
researching anyone who criticizes the 2PD and then cross-posting his
responses back to other groups which the critic has been found to
frequent. He disingenuously claims that he does this as a
"convenience" to the critic, but his true reasons are transparent.
Once again, the cross-post generates a firestorm in s.m.c.

The bottom line is that if the Two Pound Diet is "On Topic" for
anyone, it is "On Topic" for everyone... including it's critics.
If it is "Off Topic", it should not be continually re-introduced
by Dr. Chung.

16. Who is Mu?
--------------
Mu is a longtime Usenet Troll who has even merited his own FAQ. He
postures as some kind of personal physical trainer, but who really
knows? He has allied himself with Dr. Chung and serves as the "Bad
Cop"
in the Chung - Mu "Good Cop - Bad Cop" routine. He specializes in
the
short, nasty one-liner and, because unlike Dr. Chung, he has no
reputation to protect, he can afford to be much more direct and
offensive.

Mu parrots an even meaner-spirited version of Dr. Chung¹s
"Christianity" and does not hesitate to employ anti-Semitism and
homophobia in his attacks.

Naturally, most people would have long ago killfiled Mu, so he
changes
his handle on an almost daily basis.

17. What is Mu¹s Role?
----------------------
Mu¹s role is to troll other newsgroups and, when he gets a reaction,
to
cross post the reaction to s.m.c. so that Dr. Chung can
disingenuously
claim to be "only responding" to a cross post.

Mu is also responsible for pitching softballs to Dr. Chung so he can
hit them out of the park, and for re-introducing religion and the Two
Pound Diet should the discussion flag.

Finally, Mu¹s role is to tirelessly wear down unsuspecting Dr. Chung
critics, deflecting the blows that would otherwise be aimed at Dr.
Chung. He is Dr. Chung¹s Internet equivalent of the "rope-a-dope".
Insults roll off him like water off a duck as do attempts to reason
with him or even have a civil discussion.

Most people have learned to ignore him and his comment is usually the
last one in any thread sub-tree where it appears.

Comments and/or corrections to this FAQ will be taken under
advisement.

ASD is not posting from here, and we are sick to ****ing death of your
crossposting here


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:40:24 GMT, "rmg"
> wrote:

>>>
>>>I find the below message offensive.
>>>
>>>Usenet is here so people can quickly reference topics and communities of
>>>interest. By cross posting, you are undermining a system that is working for
>>>a lot of well-meaning people. You are rude and your ignorant sense of
>>>entitlement is offensive.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>>>news:1100201484.oI57DgQUtD6ntH1vgOzcpQ@teranews ...
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> George wrote:
>>>>> > Zee it is pretty anyoying that you change your posting name
>>>>> constantly
>>>>> > to slip past people's kill filters.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I know you think your message is life saving but there are many who
>>>>> > find your posts annoying.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Stick to one posting name and keep it please. You will be doing
>>>>> > everyone a favor. Those that want to read your stuff will see it,
>>>>> and
>>>>> > htose of us who don't will be spared.
>>>>>
>>>>> George
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not changing my handle to slip past kill files. I would *never* do
>>>>> that, just as I do not kill file or use an untraceable, unreal posting
>>>>> name. George. All my posting accounts are real. George at nowhere.com.
>>>>> But the name in all of them is Zee.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to effectively kill file me use Zee, or you ou could also
>>>>> try despammed. Or just don't open my posts George.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That could be said of any post here on Usenet. Yet there are those who
>>>> claim to be offended by their being forced to read what you (or I) write.
>>>> They also tend to be the same people who moments before broadcast that
>>>> they
>>>> have killfiled you (or me) and how the world seems to be a much better
>>>> place (to them).
>>>>
>>>> This comes back to your earlier request that I not broadcast your posts to
>>>> the other groups that I now regularly crosspost to by choice out of
>>>> "saltiness." Presumably this is because you do not want to offend people
>>>> who complain vociferously about being forced to read something they do not
>>>> want to read. People like George. You and I (and others) know that the
>>>> true reason for their complaints is *not* because they are forced to read
>>>> what you (or I) write but because they do not like the fact that there
>>>> clearly are others who *are* reading what you (or I) are writing. These
>>>> people email their support to you (and me) and so we continue to be openly
>>>> public about our respective causes. Yours is to inform people about
>>>> statins (mine is to inform people about satan).
>>>>
>>>> Yes, my love for you is unconditional and will not change because of what
>>>> you either write, say, or do.
>>>>
>>>> May your love be similarly unconditional though you may need Christ to
>>>> help
>>>> you be this way (I know I do).
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely no intention of irritating you George or forcing what I have
>>>>> to say on you or trying to slip past your kill file: I didn't know you
>>>>> used one, didn't know it applied to me, don't know how they work. I
>>>>> post onto the web, on Google 2: completely upfront George, completely
>>>>> traceable. No re-routers for me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> None for me either.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am Zee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am Andrew.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Read here for why I do this. Switched to badant to make sure you get
>>>>> this link. Then, from now on George. Ignore me. But first read this.
>>>>> It's not about statins.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, it is related to statins.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/56yb3
>>>>>
>>>>> "I received e-mails from someone who disagrees with my point of view,
>>>>> and with whom I have had heated discussion. His name landed in my mail
>>>>> box frequently. One day I clicked on it and set off the virus
>>>>> protection system that ate Tokyo. I deleted it. But more came from the
>>>>> same person. All carrying viruses. So I began to trace the e-mail
>>>>> address. It was quite complex. I had help. The trace took me to
>>>>> Pharmacia, told me to wait a few seconds and I would be re-directed to
>>>>> the new website, and then the new website
>>>>> opened.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Welcome to Pfizer." Pharmacia had about that time been aquired by
>>>>> Pfizer, at least in Europe, where many of this person's computer's
>>>>> traced to. I did it several times, with all the computers that person
>>>>> uses; each traced to Pfizer. I let him know, and I have not seen him
>>>>> posting again. I'd know. He was definitely not Listener.
>>>>>
>>>>> So. I am Zee. No matter what REAL e-mail address I use. I am Zee."
>>>>> Zee
>>>>
>>>> And I remain Andrew (also with real email addresses) with nearly 9 years
>>>> of
>>>> Usenet posts (15,600) behind my name :-)
>>>>
>>>> It is written in Ephesians 2:
>>>>
>>>> 10For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works,
>>>> which God prepared in advance for us to do.
>>>>
>>>> All is a waste of time until you find the way to eternal life with the
>>>> Creator of the universe. When you do, there is no waste of time because
>>>> there will be an infinite amount of it. Walking about aimlessly thinking
>>>> it is *your* time, *your* money, *your* lot, *your* labor, *your* profit,
>>>> and *your* power that you are using is tantamount to self-worship.
>>>>
>>>> For Christ provides "the way" through John 14:
>>>>
>>>> 6Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to
>>>> the Father except through me..."
>>>>
>>>> This bring us back again to the following very simple decision tree for
>>>> the
>>>> undiscerning such as yourself, Zee, still groping around in the "dark"
>>>> with
>>>> logic:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Accept Christ.
>>>> Risk: Nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits: Salvation, purposeful life, eternal life, unimaginable riches in
>>>> God's eternal kingdom.
>>>>
>>>> (2) Reject Christ.
>>>> Risk: Eternal separation from God. Eternal torment of your soul by satan.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits: Nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Again, one has to conclude that those (ie you, Carey, Steve, Bob, George,
>>>> Frank, Hawki, Don et al) who would reject Christ have not thought out
>>>> their
>>>> decision *logically*.
>>>>
>>>> Would suggest you cast a glance at tragic Bob Pastorio as a special
>>>> example
>>>> of illogically eloquent self-worship (BTW, Bob remains in my prayers out
>>>> of
>>>> Christian love) who is being driven to madness by my ignoring him. The
>>>> power is all God's and not mine. All praises to Him Whom I love with all
>>>> my heart, soul, mind, and strength :-)
>>>>
>>>> You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Christ's holy
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> May you accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
>>>> you too will escape satan's rule and torment of your soul after you die.
>>>>
>>>> Please do consider the following as your logic should dictate before it is
>>>> too late:
>>>>
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
>>>>
>>>> (Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
>>>> the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
>>>> is
>>>> a number between 1 to 9 :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>>>> Board-Certified Cardiologist
>>>> http://www.heartmdphd.com/
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> Who is the humblest person in the universe?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
>>>>
>>>> What is all this about?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48
>>>>
>>>> Is this spam?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Sleepy

------------------------------------------
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays
off now.
------------------------------------------

ASD is not posting from here, and we are sick to ****ing death of your
crossposting here


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:40:24 GMT, "rmg"
> wrote:

>>>
>>>I find the below message offensive.
>>>
>>>Usenet is here so people can quickly reference topics and communities of
>>>interest. By cross posting, you are undermining a system that is working for
>>>a lot of well-meaning people. You are rude and your ignorant sense of
>>>entitlement is offensive.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" > wrote in message
>>>news:1100201484.oI57DgQUtD6ntH1vgOzcpQ@teranews ...
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> George wrote:
>>>>> > Zee it is pretty anyoying that you change your posting name
>>>>> constantly
>>>>> > to slip past people's kill filters.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I know you think your message is life saving but there are many who
>>>>> > find your posts annoying.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Stick to one posting name and keep it please. You will be doing
>>>>> > everyone a favor. Those that want to read your stuff will see it,
>>>>> and
>>>>> > htose of us who don't will be spared.
>>>>>
>>>>> George
>>>>>
>>>>> I am not changing my handle to slip past kill files. I would *never* do
>>>>> that, just as I do not kill file or use an untraceable, unreal posting
>>>>> name. George. All my posting accounts are real. George at nowhere.com.
>>>>> But the name in all of them is Zee.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to effectively kill file me use Zee, or you ou could also
>>>>> try despammed. Or just don't open my posts George.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That could be said of any post here on Usenet. Yet there are those who
>>>> claim to be offended by their being forced to read what you (or I) write.
>>>> They also tend to be the same people who moments before broadcast that
>>>> they
>>>> have killfiled you (or me) and how the world seems to be a much better
>>>> place (to them).
>>>>
>>>> This comes back to your earlier request that I not broadcast your posts to
>>>> the other groups that I now regularly crosspost to by choice out of
>>>> "saltiness." Presumably this is because you do not want to offend people
>>>> who complain vociferously about being forced to read something they do not
>>>> want to read. People like George. You and I (and others) know that the
>>>> true reason for their complaints is *not* because they are forced to read
>>>> what you (or I) write but because they do not like the fact that there
>>>> clearly are others who *are* reading what you (or I) are writing. These
>>>> people email their support to you (and me) and so we continue to be openly
>>>> public about our respective causes. Yours is to inform people about
>>>> statins (mine is to inform people about satan).
>>>>
>>>> Yes, my love for you is unconditional and will not change because of what
>>>> you either write, say, or do.
>>>>
>>>> May your love be similarly unconditional though you may need Christ to
>>>> help
>>>> you be this way (I know I do).
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Absolutely no intention of irritating you George or forcing what I have
>>>>> to say on you or trying to slip past your kill file: I didn't know you
>>>>> used one, didn't know it applied to me, don't know how they work. I
>>>>> post onto the web, on Google 2: completely upfront George, completely
>>>>> traceable. No re-routers for me.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> None for me either.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I am Zee.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I am Andrew.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Read here for why I do this. Switched to badant to make sure you get
>>>>> this link. Then, from now on George. Ignore me. But first read this.
>>>>> It's not about statins.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Actually, it is related to statins.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/56yb3
>>>>>
>>>>> "I received e-mails from someone who disagrees with my point of view,
>>>>> and with whom I have had heated discussion. His name landed in my mail
>>>>> box frequently. One day I clicked on it and set off the virus
>>>>> protection system that ate Tokyo. I deleted it. But more came from the
>>>>> same person. All carrying viruses. So I began to trace the e-mail
>>>>> address. It was quite complex. I had help. The trace took me to
>>>>> Pharmacia, told me to wait a few seconds and I would be re-directed to
>>>>> the new website, and then the new website
>>>>> opened.
>>>>>
>>>>> "Welcome to Pfizer." Pharmacia had about that time been aquired by
>>>>> Pfizer, at least in Europe, where many of this person's computer's
>>>>> traced to. I did it several times, with all the computers that person
>>>>> uses; each traced to Pfizer. I let him know, and I have not seen him
>>>>> posting again. I'd know. He was definitely not Listener.
>>>>>
>>>>> So. I am Zee. No matter what REAL e-mail address I use. I am Zee."
>>>>> Zee
>>>>
>>>> And I remain Andrew (also with real email addresses) with nearly 9 years
>>>> of
>>>> Usenet posts (15,600) behind my name :-)
>>>>
>>>> It is written in Ephesians 2:
>>>>
>>>> 10For we are God's workmanship, created in Christ Jesus to do good works,
>>>> which God prepared in advance for us to do.
>>>>
>>>> All is a waste of time until you find the way to eternal life with the
>>>> Creator of the universe. When you do, there is no waste of time because
>>>> there will be an infinite amount of it. Walking about aimlessly thinking
>>>> it is *your* time, *your* money, *your* lot, *your* labor, *your* profit,
>>>> and *your* power that you are using is tantamount to self-worship.
>>>>
>>>> For Christ provides "the way" through John 14:
>>>>
>>>> 6Jesus answered, "I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to
>>>> the Father except through me..."
>>>>
>>>> This bring us back again to the following very simple decision tree for
>>>> the
>>>> undiscerning such as yourself, Zee, still groping around in the "dark"
>>>> with
>>>> logic:
>>>>
>>>> (1) Accept Christ.
>>>> Risk: Nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits: Salvation, purposeful life, eternal life, unimaginable riches in
>>>> God's eternal kingdom.
>>>>
>>>> (2) Reject Christ.
>>>> Risk: Eternal separation from God. Eternal torment of your soul by satan.
>>>>
>>>> Benefits: Nothing.
>>>>
>>>> Again, one has to conclude that those (ie you, Carey, Steve, Bob, George,
>>>> Frank, Hawki, Don et al) who would reject Christ have not thought out
>>>> their
>>>> decision *logically*.
>>>>
>>>> Would suggest you cast a glance at tragic Bob Pastorio as a special
>>>> example
>>>> of illogically eloquent self-worship (BTW, Bob remains in my prayers out
>>>> of
>>>> Christian love) who is being driven to madness by my ignoring him. The
>>>> power is all God's and not mine. All praises to Him Whom I love with all
>>>> my heart, soul, mind, and strength :-)
>>>>
>>>> You will be in my prayers, dear neighbor whom I love, in Christ's holy
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> May you accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior, someday, so that
>>>> you too will escape satan's rule and torment of your soul after you die.
>>>>
>>>> Please do consider the following as your logic should dictate before it is
>>>> too late:
>>>>
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?I22222129
>>>>
>>>> (Please note that God truly made this special link describing that He is
>>>> the great "I am" and that His message is as simple as the number 2 which
>>>> is
>>>> a number between 1 to 9 :-)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Servant to the humblest person in the universe,
>>>>
>>>> Andrew
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Dr. Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>>>> Board-Certified Cardiologist
>>>> http://www.heartmdphd.com/
>>>>
>>>> **
>>>> Who is the humblest person in the universe?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?L26062048
>>>>
>>>> What is all this about?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?R20632B48
>>>>
>>>> Is this spam?
>>>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?N69721867
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>


Sleepy

------------------------------------------
Hard work pays off in the future. Laziness pays
off now.
------------------------------------------