After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM

Julie Bove" wrote:
>
>After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM

I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.

On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>
>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>
> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>


You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.

On Monday, March 21, 2016 at 7:24:17 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Julie Bove" wrote:
> >
> >After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
> >video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
> >didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
> >
> >https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>
> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.

Reminds you of things you'd prefer not to ever remember, eh ShelDUM?

John Kuthe...

On 2016-03-21, l not -l > wrote:

> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow motion -
> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.

ROFL!.....

It's like, who did he copy those blatantly exaggerated mannerisms
from? Even Carol Channing isn't that ***.

nb

"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>
> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>
>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>> >>
>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>> >> sure
>> >> he
>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>> >>
>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>> >
>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>> >
>>
>>
>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>
> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow motion -
> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.

I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so fast.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>
>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>> >> sure
>>> >> he
>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>> >>
>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>> >
>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>> >
>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>
>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow motion -
>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>
>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so fast.

The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
had time to taste anything

--
Bruce

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>> >> Tube
>>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>>> >> sure
>>>> >> he
>>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>> >>
>>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>> >
>>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>> >
>>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>>
>>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow
>>> motion -
>>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
>>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>>
>>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so fast.
>
> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
> had time to taste anything

I am very pleased to have missed that ...

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:00:26 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>
>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>
>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>
>You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.

Just a little over the top? I lasted about 15 second, which was enough
to get the gist of what was on offer. What a useless waste of the
earth's resources is that little turd? I'll bet he can't do a damned
thing for himself other than make videos, suck dick and drive his
Prius.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>Julie Bove" wrote:
>>
>>After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>
>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>
>I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.

THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:36:01 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>
>>>After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>
>>I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>
>THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.

Maybe he'll be a successfull fashion designer or window dresser

--
Bruce

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:48:18 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:36:01 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>
>>>Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>
>>>>After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>>video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>>didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>
>>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>
>>>I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>
>>THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>
>Maybe he'll be a successfull fashion designer or window dresser


Yes, no doubt something that will be a genuine asset to society

On Tue, 22 Mar 2016 05:36:01 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>
>>>After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>
>>>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>
>>I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>
>THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.

I had a *** tenant who was a construction foreman on high rise
buildings in NYC... he was a good mechanic, he did carpentry,
plumbing, electrical work, etc. He never called me to repair
anything, he just did it, he even installed a new heating boiler, I
only found out because one day I was driving by and saw the old boiler
sitting in the side yard, eventually it disappeared. Basically he
didn't want me there because every few months he had a different man
of the month, but I didn't care because so long as he paid his rent
his life style was no concern of mine... and in fact each year he'd
mail me a a year's worth of post dated rent checks, so I never had to
hunt him down to pay rent. He lived there for more than 15 years,
until one day I notified him I was retiring and was putting the house
up for sale, a few days passed and he decided to buy it. He was
silly, he could have bought it long before as I had previously offered
it to him, so in the end he paid for it twice. He's still living
there and has about seven years left to go on his twenty year
mortgage. I know all about him because the realtor in town is a good
friend of mine, and his friend as well, she's who brought him to rent
the house and she's as lezzie as they come... even though at the time
she was about forty eight years old she had a very hot bod, with huge
bazooms... too bad for me she was lezzie, because we got along well
and we're still good friends. I've met lots of homos, most were
upstanding citizens with very good jobs... my brother is a faggot,
he's a big time hospital administrator, for many years he ran a
Catholic Charities Hospital in Chicago. My Brother served as a petty
officer in the US Navy, he's always been an upstanding citizen,
nothing like the unemployable Bwrrryan 4F faggot... that way under
weight skinny malink creep who could never make it through boot camp.

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>>>
>>>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>>> >> Tube
>>>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>>>> >> sure
>>>>> >> he
>>>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>>> >
>>>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>>>
>>>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow
>>>> motion -
>>>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
>>>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>>>
>>>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so
>>>fast.
>>
>> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
>> had time to taste anything
>
> I am very pleased to have missed that ...

He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using
commonly eaten food.

On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:36:06 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> wrote:

>
>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>>>> >> Tube
>>>>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>>>>> >> sure
>>>>>> >> he
>>>>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>>>>
>>>>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow
>>>>> motion -
>>>>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like Peewee
>>>>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>>>>
>>>>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so
>>>>fast.
>>>
>>> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
>>> had time to taste anything
>>
>> I am very pleased to have missed that ...
>
>He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using
>commonly eaten food.

Oh, I didn't see enough of it to get that.

--
Bruce

"Bruce" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 15:36:06 -0700, "Julie Bove"
> > wrote:
>
>>
>>"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>>>>> >> Tube
>>>>>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it.
>>>>>>> >> Pretty
>>>>>>> >> sure
>>>>>>> >> he
>>>>>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is
>>>>>>> >> funny!
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow
>>>>>> motion -
>>>>>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like
>>>>>> Peewee
>>>>>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>>>>>
>>>>>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so
>>>>>fast.
>>>>
>>>> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
>>>> had time to taste anything
>>>
>>> I am very pleased to have missed that ...
>>
>>He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using
>>commonly eaten food.
>
> Oh, I didn't see enough of it to get that.

Yes. Things like Sprite (lemon lime soda), Oreos (cookies), Potato Chips
(crisps), bananas and baby carrots. Oh, also some granola bars. He has a
lot of other videos but I haven't seen them so don't know the subject. He
was also making fun of those people who do videos of themselves eating weird
food.

On 3/21/2016 6:14 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> The first 3.5 seconds were enough for me.
>
> -sw

I have been stuffing my fat little ****ing face again with food I
'borrowed' from:

https://www.austinfoodbank.org/news/...unteer-quarter


OK I admit it, I am eating my way through Texas.

Make me a zip code, or two.

On 3/21/2016 6:15 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> You love it - you know you do.
>
> -sw

I have been stuffing my fat little ****ing face again with food I
'borrowed' from:

https://www.austinfoodbank.org/news/...unteer-quarter


OK I admit it, I am eating my way through Texas.

Make me a zip code, or two.

On 3/21/2016 6:23 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> It's funny how it said there were something like 92,000 views.

I have been stuffing my fat little ****ing face again with food I
'borrowed' from:

https://www.austinfoodbank.org/news/...unteer-quarter


OK I admit it, I am eating my way through Texas.

Make me a zip code, or two.

"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "Bruce" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:37:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21-Mar-2016, Dave Smith > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2016-03-21 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> > Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>>>> >> Tube
>>>>>> >> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>>>>> >> sure
>>>>>> >> he
>>>>>> >> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is
>>>>>> >> funny!
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> You made me look. I lasted 6 seconds. He is a little over the top.
>>>>>
>>>>> I lasted 26 seconds - it was like watching a train wreck in slow
>>>>> motion -
>>>>> it's terrible, but I couldn't look away, at first. He is like
>>>>> Peewee
>>>>> Herman gone horribly, horribly wrong.
>>>>
>>>>I simply couldn't understand what he was saying. He was speaking so
>>>>fast.
>>>
>>> The sound isn't very good. Anyway, he starts mock puking before he has
>>> had time to taste anything
>>
>> I am very pleased to have missed that ...
>
> He was making fun of those who make fun of vegans because he was using
> commonly eaten food.

Ok

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 3/21/2016 8:27 AM, Julie Bove wrote:
> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure
> he didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM

Well... that was annoying. I couldn't get through more than a minute of
it before I threw up my hands (just like he kept doing) and quit.

Jill

On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> > wrote:
>
>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>
>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>
>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>
>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>
> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>
I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.

Jill

On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 9:11:57 AM UTC-6, Jill McQuown wrote:
> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je�us wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Julie Bove" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
> >>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
> >>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
> >>
> >> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
> >
> > THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
> > but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
> > like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
> > electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
> > legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
> > is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
> >
> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>
> Jill

Same thing many could say to females in our contemporary culture who paint themselves up like China Dolls! Hair, makeup and all the trappings of modern cultural consumerist "beauty"! HA! :-(

John Kuthe...

In article >, says...
>
> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
> > On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> Julie Bove" wrote:
> >>>
> >>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
> >>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
> >>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
> >>>
> >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
> >>
> >> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
> >
> > THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
> > but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
> > like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
> > electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
> > legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
> > is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
> >
> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.

Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
etc etc etc.

*** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
flaunt it.

Janet UK

On 2016-03-24 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>
>>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>
>>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>>
>> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>
> Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
> up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
> pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
> etc etc etc.
>
> *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
> degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
> flaunt it.
>

Well, I would say it is quite different. One is going to extremes to be
what we think is the role of their gender while the other is overdoing
it with behaviour they think exemplifies the opposite sex. There are a
lot of screwed up people out there. I feel quite comfortable as a
heterosexual male. I can't see myself being physically or romantically
involved with another guy.... though apparently many are. The ones I
feel really sorry for are the transsexuals who are not only confused
about their sexuality, but about their gender. I am alarmed at the
number of male to female transexuals who end up in relationships with
women. That is a lot of medical work and a lot of surgery to become a
*******.

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 11:11:51 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>
>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>
>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>
>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>
>I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.

Yes, that's exactly how I feel about it too. I think in many cases
it's merely an excuse to draw attention to themselves.

On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says...
>>
>> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>
>>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>
>>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>>
>> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>
> Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
> up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
> pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
> etc etc etc.
>
> *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
> degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
> flaunt it.
>
> Janet UK
>
>
>
Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video
was annoying as hell.

Jill

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
>> In article >, says...
>>>
>>> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You
>>>>>> Tube
>>>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty
>>>>>> sure he
>>>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>>>>
>>>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>>>
>>>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>>>
>>> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>>> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>>> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>>> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>>
>> Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
>> up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
>> pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
>> etc etc etc.
>>
>> *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
>> degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
>> flaunt it.
>>
>> Janet UK
>>
>>
>>
> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video was
> annoying as hell.

I don't typically hang out with them either but I certainly have met many
like this in real life. So that part didn't bother me at all.

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:04:47 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

> I am alarmed at the
> number of male to female transexuals who end up in relationships with
> women. That is a lot of medical work and a lot of surgery to become a
> *******.

I always think it was a waste of time and money too, but I guess there
was a ******* hiding inside the original male body waiting to come
out.

--

sf

On 24/03/2016 12:04 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
I am alarmed at the
> number of male to female transexuals who end up in relationships with
> women. That is a lot of medical work and a lot of surgery to become a
> *******.
>
Why? It's normal apparently. A US psych determined that M to F trannies
never lose their maleness. I know of 2 who have gone through the surgery
and are shacked up/married to *******s.
Graham

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:36:30 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
> > In article >, says...
> >>
> >> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
> >>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
> >>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
> >>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
> >>>>
> >>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
> >>>
> >>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
> >>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
> >>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
> >>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
> >>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
> >>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
> >>>
> >> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
> >> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
> >> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
> >> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
> >
> > Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
> > up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
> > pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
> > etc etc etc.
> >
> > *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
> > degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
> > flaunt it.
> >
> > Janet UK
> >
> >
> >
> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video
> was annoying as hell.
>

He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.

--

sf

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:36:30 -0400, jmcquown >
>wrote:
>
>> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
>> > In article >, says...
>> >>
>> >> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>> >>> > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>> >>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>> >>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>> >>>
>> >>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>> >>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>> >>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>> >>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>> >>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>> >>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>> >>>
>> >> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>> >> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>> >> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>> >> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>> >
>> > Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
>> > up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
>> > pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
>> > etc etc etc.
>> >
>> > *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
>> > degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
>> > flaunt it.
>> >
>> > Janet UK
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
>> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video
>> was annoying as hell.
>>
>
>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.

You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?

--
Bruce

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 15:36:30 -0400, jmcquown >
>>wrote:
>>
>>> On 3/24/2016 1:02 PM, Janet wrote:
>>> > In article >, says...
>>> >>
>>> >> On 3/21/2016 2:36 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> >>> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:23:37 -0400, Brooklyn1
>>> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> Julie Bove" wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> After the recent discussion here, I thought I would post this You Tube
>>> >>>>> video. And no, I didn't find it. Somebody told about it. Pretty sure he
>>> >>>>> didn't actually buy that stuff at Whole Foods though. It is funny!
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4p6FApkH0lM
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> I could only watch for 30 seconds, that faggot disgusted me.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> THIS time I agree with you. I have no problems with anyone being ***,
>>> >>> but I have no time for these types who put on the '***' histrionics
>>> >>> like this guy. Do any of these types ever become plumbers,
>>> >>> electricians, builders, mechanics or anything else that is a
>>> >>> legitimate asset to society? Rarely... very rarely. Their only talent
>>> >>> is to accentuate and exploit their 'gayness' in modern society.
>>> >>>
>>> >> I've known a number of gays over the years who weren't blantant about
>>> >> it. This is just too over the top. I have nothing against *** people
>>> >> but I hate overkill. Shut the hell up. I don't care who you sleep
>>> >> with, you don't have to wave a friggin flag.
>>> >
>>> > Is it REALLY so different from some heterosexual women who never lets
>>> > up reminding the world about their sexuality (in looks, dress, gesture,
>>> > pouting, posturing, eyelash batting, how she walks, speaks, mannerisms
>>> > etc etc etc.
>>> >
>>> > *** men and women have had to wait an awful lot longer for that
>>> > degree of freedom and I think it's pretty inevitable some choose to
>>> > flaunt it.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> Flaunting is flaunting, regardless. I don't hang out with anyone of any
>>> sex or sexuality who comes across that strongly. The man on the video
>>> was annoying as hell.
>>>
>>
>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>
>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?

You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>
>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>>
>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>
>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.

What brings you to this interesting perspective?

--
Bruce

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>
>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>>>
>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>>
>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
>
>What brings you to this interesting perspective?

Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
whatever).

And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
ignorant and narrow-minded person.

Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
situation.

It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
mainstream party.

People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
I call that narrow-minded.

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:39:53 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>>>>
>>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>>>
>>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
>>
>>What brings you to this interesting perspective?
>
>Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
>whatever).
>
>And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
>support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
>ignorant and narrow-minded person.
>
>Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
>to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
>open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
>situation.
>
>It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
>that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
>don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
>thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
>Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
>the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
>about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
>mainstream party.
>
>People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
>DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
>I call that narrow-minded.

Sure but I wasn't so much commenting on that caricature *** guy, but
wondering if sf implied what I thought she implied.

--
Bruce

On Thursday, March 24, 2016 at 6:42:02 PM UTC-6, sf wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:04:47 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> > I am alarmed at the
> > number of male to female transexuals who end up in relationships with
> > women. That is a lot of medical work and a lot of surgery to become a
> > *******.
>
> I always think it was a waste of time and money too, but I guess there
> was a ******* hiding inside the original male body waiting to come
> out.
>
> --
>
> sf

I can see that. I've said for years I'm a ******* trapped in a man's body! I know many men say that, but that's what makes it so hard on those of us who really are!

John Kuthe...

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:47:28 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:39:53 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>>>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>>>>>
>>>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>>>>
>>>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
>>>
>>>What brings you to this interesting perspective?
>>
>>Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
>>whatever).
>>
>>And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
>>support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
>>ignorant and narrow-minded person.
>>
>>Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
>>to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
>>open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
>>situation.
>>
>>It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
>>that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
>>don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
>>thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
>>Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
>>the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
>>about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
>>mainstream party.
>>
>>People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
>>DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
>>I call that narrow-minded.
>
>Sure but I wasn't so much commenting on that caricature *** guy, but
>wondering if sf implied what I thought she implied.

She might of, although I don't really follow modern being necessarily
open-minded (or the corollary of that).

On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:47:28 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:39:53 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
> >>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
> >>>>
> >>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
> >>>
> >>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
> >>
> >>What brings you to this interesting perspective?
> >
> >Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
> >whatever).
> >
> >And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
> >support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
> >ignorant and narrow-minded person.
> >
> >Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
> >to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
> >open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
> >situation.
> >
> >It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
> >that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
> >don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
> >thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
> >Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
> >the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
> >about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
> >mainstream party.
> >
> >People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
> >DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
> >I call that narrow-minded.
>
> Sure but I wasn't so much commenting on that caricature *** guy, but
> wondering if sf implied what I thought she implied.

It has more to do with exposure. When you know them, you can
understand the humor better. Let's face it, the South would be very
happy to reinstate slavery, so gays might as well cease to exist.

--

sf

On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 21:12:35 -0700, sf > wrote:

>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:47:28 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:39:53 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>> >On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:20:54 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>> >
>> >>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:09:26 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>On Fri, 25 Mar 2016 12:03:34 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>>On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 17:52:36 -0700, sf > wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>>He wasn't annoying, it was a funny theatrical effeminate caricature.
>> >>>>>Maybe it's a West Coast vs Southern perspective.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>You mean modern/open-minded versus backward/narrow-minded?
>> >>>
>> >>>You sound narrow minded, actually. But you're far from alone there.
>> >>
>> >>What brings you to this interesting perspective?
>> >
>> >Partly your assumption that anyone from 'the south' are rednecks (or
>> >whatever).
>> >
>> >And partly that anyone who doesn't wholeheartedly and unquestionably
>> >support gays no matter what they do is some sort of knuckle-dragging,
>> >ignorant and narrow-minded person.
>> >
>> >Some of us have moved on from blindly accepting and supporting gays,
>> >to realising they have the same shortcomings as anyone else and are
>> >open to criticism when appropriate. Many clearly exploit/abuse this
>> >situation.
>> >
>> >It's much like the average Greens supporter these days. What is it
>> >that they actually support, when you look at what the Greens do (or
>> >don't do) in actual practice? And yet, people get a nice warm glow
>> >thinking they're somehow morally superior being Green voters.
>> >Silly me, I thought the Greens were supposed to be there to protect
>> >the environment, when in reality they don't give the slightest ****
>> >about it. All they care about is winning votes like any other
>> >mainstream party.
>> >
>> >People like to develop a belief system (of sorts) - what they then
>> >DON'T like is to ever question it or reevaluate it when things change.
>> >I call that narrow-minded.
>>
>> Sure but I wasn't so much commenting on that caricature *** guy, but
>> wondering if sf implied what I thought she implied.
>
>It has more to do with exposure. When you know them, you can
>understand the humor better. Let's face it, the South would be very
>happy to reinstate slavery, so gays might as well cease to exist.

I don't know much about the south of the US. I guess Texas is part of
that. Not immediately the state I'd choose to live. But Lousiana would
be an option and that's also south, I think. Baton Rouge, Louisiana
sound kind of cool.

--
Bruce