Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-09 8:35 AM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, says... been, you'd never know. >>> >>> There's a difference between being spoiled because somebody wants to >>> spoil you as a treat, and being 'spoiled' because one is self-centred, >>> self-indulgent and expects to be treated as a princess. >> >> I am certainly not self centered. Not necessarily self-indulgent although I >> am in some aspects. But yes, people like to spoil me as a treat. Perhaps >> because I am nice. I am taking a friend of friend to the dentist in a few >> days. She lives in a different city. Has no car and the dentist is not on a >> bus route. I don't have to do this. But it is something I can do and it is >> helpful to someone. I like to be helpful. > > However, it's not an example of someone giving you a treat. > > As if it is every going to happen. I doubt the dentist works nights. Julie stays up nights compulsively posting on various new groups and then sleeps all day. I hope that her friend has a Plan B. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-09 12:45 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> I'm sure she'd say that one could "spoil" onself. With, say, a bubblebath > if that's what one likes. She says right at the top of this post that > she considers herself spoiled. You have to admit that she has had a pretty easy life. She only had to go to work for few years before getting canned.... or "retired" with no pension. She is free to stay up all night compulsively posting in news groups and then she sleeps all day. It's not my idea of a life but she seems to be hooked on it. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2016-06-09 8:35 AM, Janet wrote: >> In article >, says... > been, you'd never know. >>>> >>>> There's a difference between being spoiled because somebody wants to >>>> spoil you as a treat, and being 'spoiled' because one is self-centred, >>>> self-indulgent and expects to be treated as a princess. >>> >>> I am certainly not self centered. Not necessarily self-indulgent >>> although I >>> am in some aspects. But yes, people like to spoil me as a treat. Perhaps >>> because I am nice. I am taking a friend of friend to the dentist in a >>> few >>> days. She lives in a different city. Has no car and the dentist is not >>> on a >>> bus route. I don't have to do this. But it is something I can do and it >>> is >>> helpful to someone. I like to be helpful. >> >> However, it's not an example of someone giving you a treat. >> >> > > > As if it is every going to happen. I doubt the dentist works nights. Julie > stays up nights compulsively posting on various new groups and then sleeps > all day. I hope that her friend has a Plan B. It turned out not to be a dentist but a Dr. It was an afternoon appointment. I would have liked more sleep but didn't get it. Oh and... I compulsively post on various new groups? Which groups might those be? This is about the only Usenet group that I post to. Once in a while to the diabetes or thyroid groups but for the most part, those and all of the other groups I've seen are dead. Once in a while I get notice of some new group. Never of interest to me. So... Where exactly am I posting now? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2016-06-09 12:45 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > >> I'm sure she'd say that one could "spoil" onself. With, say, a >> bubblebath >> if that's what one likes. She says right at the top of this post that >> she considers herself spoiled. > > You have to admit that she has had a pretty easy life. She only had to go > to work for few years before getting canned.... or "retired" with no > pension. She is free to stay up all night compulsively posting in news > groups and then she sleeps all day. It's not my idea of a life but she > seems to be hooked on it. Why do you keep lying? I retired from K Mart after 17 years. I have a pension. I even posted about it here, stating that I'd been advised to take it early lest they fold for good. That was not my only job. I had several others and I was never "canned" from any job. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, says...
> > "Janet" > wrote in message > .. . > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 10:55:30 AM UTC-4, Roy wrote: > >> > On Wednesday, June 8, 2016 at 12:40:21 AM UTC-6, Julie Bove wrote: > >> > > "Ophelia" > wrote in message > >> > > ... > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > "Jeßus" > wrote in message > >> > > > ... > >> > > >> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 14:01:48 +0100, "Ophelia" > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message > >> > > .. . > >> > > >>>> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:12:53 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton > >> > > >>>> > wrote: > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>>>On Monday, June 6, 2016 at 12:48:58 PM UTC-4, Janet wrote: > >> > > >>>>>> In article >, > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> says... > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> > I have no idea what soft fruit would be. We are not big > >> > > >>>>>> > fruit > >> > > >>>>>> > eaters > >> > > >>>>>> > and > >> > > >>>>>> > there are only a few fruits that we do eat. And you don't > >> > > >>>>>> > know > >> > > >>>>>> > anything > >> > > >>>>>> > about me if that is really what you think. But spoiled? > >> > > >>>>>> > Sure. Are > >> > > >>>>>> > you > >> > > >>>>>> > jealous? > >> > > >>>>>> > >> > > >>>>>> It's safe to assume that nobody on this entire group is > >> > > >>>>>> jealous of > >> > > >>>>>> you, > >> > > >>>>>> Julie. > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>She doesn't realize that spoiled isn't a good thing. > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>1. diminish or destroy the value or quality of. > >> > > >>>>>2. harm the character of (a child) by being too lenient or > >> > > >>>>>indulgent > >> > > >>>>> > >> > > >>>>>There's a reason we call it "spoiled milk" or a child "spoiled > >> > > >>>>>rotten". > >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> IIRC, Julie has previously described herself as a 'princess' or > >> > > >>>> at > >> > > >>>> least being treated as one. > >> > > >>> > >> > > >>>In which case she will be very happy to be treated so well. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> We've already established that. > >> > > > > >> > > > ? So why were you commenting again that she 'described herself as a > >> > > > 'princess' or at least being treated as one'. > >> > > > >> > > They are jealous but... Based on their behavior, I could see why > >> > > others > >> > > wouldn't treat them well. > >> > > >> > Why on Gawd's green earth would we be jealous?...a totally ridiculous > >> > statement. Spoiled brats are just THAT no matter how old they are. > >> > Always expecting special treatment in the public domain is at best an > >> > annoyance. > >> > ==== > >> > >> She doesn't seem to distinguish between "spoil" and "indulge". A little > >> indulgence can be nice. A lot leads to "spoiled". > >> > >> > >> Cindy Hamilton > > > > I've yet to read a single example of Julie's paqrents, daughter or > > husband "indulging" her, giving her a treat, treating her with kindness > > or respect, or doing anything whatever to make her life easier or > > happier. > > > > They all appear to be hellbent on treating her like dirt or a domestic > > slave. > > I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. How > could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom takes me > out to eat once a week. You've always claimed you took her. Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when you wouldn't eat? Janet UK |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Janet" > wrote in message .. . >> I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. How >> could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom takes me >> out to eat once a week. > > You've always claimed you took her. My mom is blind so I drive her to the restaurant. She pays for our meals. > > Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when > you wouldn't eat? No. I didn't say that at all. What I said was that we used to take her to lunch *and* dinner. We had to stop with the dinner because she was wanting to eat 2-3 hours after we ate lunch. We just can't do that. I would imagine most people would not want to eat their meals that close together. > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-09 4:15 PM, Janet wrote:
slave. >> >> I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. How >> could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom takes me >> out to eat once a week. > > You've always claimed you took her. > > Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when > you wouldn't eat? > > Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/9/2016 6:32 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-06-09 4:15 PM, Janet wrote: > slave. >>> >>> I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. >>> How >>> could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom >>> takes me >>> out to eat once a week. >> >> You've always claimed you took her. >> >> Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when >> you wouldn't eat? >> >> > Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. > No, I agree with Julie on this one. She said she drove her mother, not that she paid for it. And then her mother always wanted to eat again just a few hours after lunch. I don't eat a lot so going out to lunch and then dinner even 5 hours later, I likely wouldn't have much of an appetite. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-09 6:42 PM, Bruce wrote:
\ >>> You've always claimed you took her. >>> >>> Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when >>> you wouldn't eat? >>> >>> >> Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. > > Why do you put her in your killfile when she's your favourite topic of > conversation? > Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too much material in there to ignore. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2016-06-09 4:15 PM, Janet wrote: > slave. >>> >>> I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. >>> How >>> could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom takes >>> me >>> out to eat once a week. >> >> You've always claimed you took her. >> >> Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when >> you wouldn't eat? >> >> > Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. I'm not the liar here. I'm actually surprised that you two aren't bumping noses. Yours should have grown quite long by now. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > wrote in message ... > On 6/9/2016 6:32 PM, Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2016-06-09 4:15 PM, Janet wrote: >> slave. >>>> >>>> I know you *think* that I post my entire life story here but I don't. >>>> How >>>> could my dad be spoiling me now? Pennies from heaven? And my mom >>>> takes me >>>> out to eat once a week. >>> >>> You've always claimed you took her. >>> >>> Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when >>> you wouldn't eat? >>> >>> >> Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. >> > No, I agree with Julie on this one. She said she drove her mother, not > that she paid for it. And then her mother always wanted to eat again just > a few hours after lunch. > > I don't eat a lot so going out to lunch and then dinner even 5 hours > later, I likely wouldn't have much of an appetite. Thank you. That is indeed what I said. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote: > Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply > to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too > much material in there to ignore. You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting her into responding so they can be mean back at her. -- sf |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >>On 2016-06-09 6:42 PM, Bruce wrote: >>\ >>>>> You've always claimed you took her. >>>>> >>>>> Didn't you just tell us that had stopped, because she got angry when >>>>> you wouldn't eat? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Damn. Julie trapped herself in another lie. >>> >>> Why do you put her in your killfile when she's your favourite topic of >>> conversation? >>> >> >>Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >>to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>much material in there to ignore. > > Most of that material comes from her dedicated critics. Yes. They make stuff up about me then respond to each other as if it were true. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >> much material in there to ignore. > > You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they > turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting > her into responding so they can be mean back at her. Why would he do that???? He always bleats she is in his killfile but he doesn't have the intelligence to ignore her, besides, he can't bear to read anything she says without responding ![]() .... <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>> much material in there to ignore. >> >> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. > > Why would he do that???? He always bleats she is in his killfile but he > doesn't have the intelligence to ignore her, besides, he can't bear to > read anything she says without responding ![]() > lurve ... <g> Oh thanks. Now I am squicked. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Julie Bove" > wrote in message ... > > "Ophelia" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> "sf" > wrote in message >> ... >>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people >>>> reply >>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>>> much material in there to ignore. >>> >>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. >> >> Why would he do that???? He always bleats she is in his killfile but he >> doesn't have the intelligence to ignore her, besides, he can't bear to >> read anything she says without responding ![]() >> lurve ... <g> > > Oh thanks. Now I am squicked. lol I know just how you must feel ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith > > wrote: > >> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >> much material in there to ignore. > > You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they > turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting > her into responding so they can be mean back at her. > People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the most bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or justify. Nobody baits her. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ophelia" > wrote in message ... > > > "sf" > wrote in message > ... >> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >> > wrote: >> >>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>> much material in there to ignore. >> >> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. > > Why would he do that???? He always bleats she is in his killfile but he > doesn't have the intelligence to ignore her, besides, he can't bear to > read anything she says without responding ![]() > lurve ... <g> So true. He can't help himself. LOL Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > You have to admit that she has had a pretty easy life. She only had to go > to work for few years before getting canned.... or "retired" with no > pension. She is free to stay up all night compulsively posting in news > groups and then she sleeps all day. It's not my idea of a life but she > seems to be hooked on it. This coming from someone who posts a couple of hundred times a day, everyday. It is to laugh. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote: >>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >>> > wrote: >>> >>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>>> much material in there to ignore. >>> >>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. >>> >> >> >> People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a >> habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the most >> bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or >> justify. Nobody baits her. > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part > of it. > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that I was wrong. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Cheri" > wrote in message ... > > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message > ... > >> You have to admit that she has had a pretty easy life. She only had to go >> to work for few years before getting canned.... or "retired" with no >> pension. She is free to stay up all night compulsively posting in news >> groups and then she sleeps all day. It's not my idea of a life but she >> seems to be hooked on it. > > This coming from someone who posts a couple of hundred times a day, > everyday. It is to laugh. Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! I think Dave is just bored in his retirement years. Remember he also checks out cars parked in the handicap spaces to see if they have a valid permit. heheh |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary" wrote in message ...
Ophelia wrote: > Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! I think Dave is just bored in his retirement years. Remember he also checks out cars parked in the handicap spaces to see if they have a valid permit. heheh ======= LOL, I don't know how he has the time to do that when he never leaves the computer, but maybe there's an app for it. ;-) Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" > wrote in message ... > Ophelia wrote: >> Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! > > I think Dave is just bored in his retirement years. Remember he also > checks out cars parked in the handicap spaces to see if they have a > valid permit. heheh Oh dear ... that too??? I can't say I am surprised. What a saddo!! -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 10:21:02 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
> Ophelia wrote: > > Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! > > I think Dave is just bored in his retirement years. Remember he also > checks out cars parked in the handicap spaces to see if they have a > valid permit. heheh So who are you old farts going to pick-on tomorrow? Dave is no worse than many others on this forum including myself. We don't have to agree with a person in order to tolerate them expressing an opinion. Gary...you are fomenting dissension in the ranks...smarten up. ==== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roy" wrote in message
... On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 10:21:02 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote: > Ophelia wrote: > > Yes, he seems to be hooked on Julie. Sounds like it is time he grew up! > > I think Dave is just bored in his retirement years. Remember he also > checks out cars parked in the handicap spaces to see if they have a > valid permit. heheh So who are you old farts going to pick-on tomorrow? Dave is no worse than many others on this forum including myself. We don't have to agree with a person in order to tolerate them expressing an opinion. Gary...you are fomenting dissension in the ranks...smarten up. ==== Unless it's Julie expressing an opinion eh, then many feel that it's ok to dog her to death. Also, it could be pointed out that you're not very tolerant with the "old farts" expressing their opinions with the above post, so MYOB. Cheri Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > >> > >> On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote: > >>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith > >>> > wrote: > >>> > >>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply > >>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too > >>>> much material in there to ignore. > >>> > >>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they > >>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting > >>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. > >>> > >> > >> > >> People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a > >> habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the most > >> bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or > >> justify. Nobody baits her. > > > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part > > of it. > > > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that > I was wrong. I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the endless bickering that follows everything she says. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:46:04 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, > says... > > > > On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: > > > In article >, > > > says... > > >> > > >> On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith > > >>> > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply > > >>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too > > >>>> much material in there to ignore. > > >>> > > >>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they > > >>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting > > >>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. > > >>> > > >> > > >> > > >> People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a > > >> habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the most > > >> bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or > > >> justify. Nobody baits her. > > > > > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part > > > of it. > > > > > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that > > I was wrong. > > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > endless bickering that follows everything she says. You didn't notice anything bizarre because your brain is fried. ==== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:46:04 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > > > > > > On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: > > > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part > > > > of it. > > > > > > > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that > > > I was wrong. > > > > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > > endless bickering that follows everything she says. > > You didn't notice anything bizarre because your brain is fried. > ==== "We don't have to agree with a person in order to tolerate them expressing an opinion." (Roy, 1 hour ago) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 1:06:24 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, > says... > > > > On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:46:04 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: > > > In article >, > > > says... > > > > > > > > On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: > > > > > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a > large part > > > > > of it. > > > > > > > > > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that > > > > I was wrong. > > > > > > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > > > endless bickering that follows everything she says. > > > > You didn't notice anything bizarre because your brain is fried. > > ==== > > "We don't have to agree with a person in order to tolerate them > expressing an opinion." (Roy, 1 hour ago) So...I tolerated your expression of an opinion, I just didn't like IT. Ahahahahahaha ==== |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" > wrote in message T... > In article >, > says... >> >> On Friday, June 10, 2016 at 12:46:04 PM UTC-6, Bruce wrote: >> > In article >, >> > says... >> > > >> > > On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: > >> > > > You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a > large part >> > > > of it. >> > > > >> > > Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument >> > > that >> > > I was wrong. >> > >> > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the >> > endless bickering that follows everything she says. >> >> You didn't notice anything bizarre because your brain is fried. >> ==== > > "We don't have to agree with a person in order to tolerate them > expressing an opinion." (Roy, 1 hour ago) LOL, perfect. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-06-10 2:45 PM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, > says... >> >> On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: >>> In article >, >>> says... >>>> >>>> On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote: >>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people reply >>>>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way too >>>>>> much material in there to ignore. >>>>> >>>>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >>>>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >>>>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a >>>> habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the most >>>> bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or >>>> justify. Nobody baits her. >>> >>> You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part >>> of it. >>> >> Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that >> I was wrong. > > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > endless bickering that follows everything she says. > Seriously??? You have not seen any of Julie's bizarre comments or realized that she is lying? This is a woman who had previously posted about her husband stopping to eat supper on the way home and later denied that she had posted that. She had claimed to be a writer but later denied being a writer, denied having claimed that she was a writer. When someone (not me) dug up her old posts with the claim that she was a writer she said she didn't remember posting that. She had problems in a store with some guy wearing a turban hassled her with a broom. I don't remember if that is the same store where the birds are always getting into the bread on the lower shelves. The list of lies and bizarre claims and denials is long. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... > On 2016-06-10 2:45 PM, Bruce wrote: >> In article >, >> says... >>> >>> On 2016-06-10 8:41 AM, Bruce wrote: >>>> In article >, >>>> says... >>>>> >>>>> On 2016-06-09 9:57 PM, sf wrote: >>>>>> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 20:19:32 -0400, Dave Smith >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Having her in my killfille is not very effective when other people >>>>>>> reply >>>>>>> to her and include her quoted text. You have to admit there is way >>>>>>> too >>>>>>> much material in there to ignore. >>>>>> >>>>>> You can always KF the subjects of threads she initiates or when they >>>>>> turn into "all about Julie" threads - meaning people are just baiting >>>>>> her into responding so they can be mean back at her. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> People bait Julie????? Holy Crap. You can't be serious. Julie has a >>>>> habit of throwing herself into the firing line by blurting out the >>>>> most >>>>> bizarre things and then keeps throwing in lies to try to explain or >>>>> justify. Nobody baits her. >>>> >>>> You complain about too much Julie content, but you produce a large part >>>> of it. >>>> >>> Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that >>> I was wrong. >> >> I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the >> endless bickering that follows everything she says. >> > > > Seriously??? You have not seen any of Julie's bizarre comments or realized > that she is lying? This is a woman who had previously posted about her > husband stopping to eat supper on the way home and later denied that she > had posted that. She had claimed to be a writer but later denied being a > writer, denied having claimed that she was a writer. When someone (not me) > dug up her old posts with the claim that she was a writer she said she > didn't remember posting that. She had problems in a store with some guy > wearing a turban hassled her with a broom. I don't remember if that is the > same store where the birds are always getting into the bread on the lower > shelves. The list of lies and bizarre claims and denials is long. > No Dave. What actually happens is that you take what I say, twist it into something else and then call me a liar. I do remember in recent years (perhaps the last 3) that my husband stopped for Pho on the way home and did not tell me he was doing it. Then he didn't want dinner. Apparently prior to that, he did do something or other, but now I can't remember what. But ate elsewhere so wasn't wanting dinner when he got home. But this was many years ago and the details of that escape me. This is apparently what you remember my saying. But unlike you, I do not fixate on every little detail that goes on in my life and torture myself about it. I move on. Just because my husband used to do something does not mean that he does it now. He used to wear New Balance shoes too. I used to buy him the clearance ones online, just like I do for myself. Now he buys Brookes and he buys his own. Unlike me, he actually runs in his shoes. So what would be okay for me to walk through Costco with, was not working for his however many miles he runs and it was causing him medical problems. He also used to wear a certain kind of underwear and now wears another. A certain type of socks, but now another. You see, things change. I never denied claiming to be a writer. In fact said that I won the USA Today Haiku contest for my poem on Baklava. I am not currently writing anything nor seeking publication. I have been published in the past. Small things and they for sure didn't make me rich. That whole stupid comment came about when someone (can't remember who now) claimed that I wasn't for real and I had made up a persona. And now I know that you or someone else will come along and say that I am lying again because I won't phrase this word for word like I did then. But I made a smart remark to the effect of that I was a writer and if I was going to make up a persona, it would be one that was more interesting than me. Something like that. The mad turban broomer was for real. Walmart in Lynnwood on 164th. Angela can back me up here. Not that she would actually post here. He came at me with his giant dust mop/broom thing. And it happened more than once. I think he is long gone. We don't go to that store much any more. Those incidents were years ago and I haven't seen him since. The Woodinville Costco still has a bird problem. And it wasn't just the lower shelves. Birds can fly you know. Costco realized that it was a problem and took various steps to try to keep the birds out. One was the plastic curtain thing that sw mentioned. I saw it up once and never again. So it didn't work out or something. I have not seen any birds deep into the store now. They are mostly near the snack bar. But having worked in a store, I know how easy it is for a bird to accidentally fly in there and not be able get back out. Now why don't you go do something in the kitchen? Maybe Jill can give you advice on how to steam broccoli or something. Me? I plan to go to Sam's Club a little later. Am waiting to see if my handyman will show up today. He might not as they are predicting a thunderstorm. He was going to bark my beds and put down weed stuff. I fired my gardener, if you care. The one I hired after Matt died just wasn't working out. Yard looks like crud. Fortunately for me, my new neighbor is a landscaper and he said he can give me help if I need it. Oh what? That's right Dave. In real life, some people are actually nice to me. They don't all seek me out with brooms. My horoscope says that I will have a nice day. And I plan to. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
says... > > On 2016-06-10 2:45 PM, Bruce wrote: > > In article >, > > says... > >> Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument that > >> I was wrong. > > > > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > > endless bickering that follows everything she says. > > > Seriously??? You have not seen any of Julie's bizarre comments or > realized that she is lying? This is a woman who had previously posted > about her husband stopping to eat supper on the way home and later > denied that she had posted that. This just isn't something that keeps me awake at night. I read posts and I comment or not. I don't keep track of what someone said 2 years ago and whether that's consistent with what they're saying now. Depending on my mood, I can say that I hate tea. Or I can say that I drink tea once a month. Or I can say that I never drink tea. Because it changes over time. It's all true. And why would anyone worry about it anyway? > She had claimed to be a writer but > later denied being a writer, denied having claimed that she was a > writer. When someone (not me) dug up her old posts with the claim that > she was a writer she said she didn't remember posting that. She had > problems in a store with some guy wearing a turban hassled her with a > broom. I don't remember if that is the same store where the birds are > always getting into the bread on the lower shelves. The list of lies > and bizarre claims and denials is long. How do you know? Why do you care? Don't you have things to do? Real life people to haunt? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bruce" > wrote in message T... > In article >, > says... >> >> On 2016-06-10 2:45 PM, Bruce wrote: >> > In article >, >> > says... > >> >> Yeah yeah yeah, but I notice that you could not present an argument > that >> >> I was wrong. >> > >> > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the >> > endless bickering that follows everything she says. >> > >> Seriously??? You have not seen any of Julie's bizarre comments or >> realized that she is lying? This is a woman who had previously posted >> about her husband stopping to eat supper on the way home and later >> denied that she had posted that. lol > > This just isn't something that keeps me awake at night. I read posts and > I comment or not. I don't keep track of what someone said 2 years ago > and whether that's consistent with what they're saying now. lol > > Depending on my mood, I can say that I hate tea. Or I can say that I > drink tea once a month. Or I can say that I never drink tea. Because it > changes over time. It's all true. And why would anyone worry about it > anyway? > >> She had claimed to be a writer but >> later denied being a writer, denied having claimed that she was a >> writer. When someone (not me) dug up her old posts with the claim that >> she was a writer she said she didn't remember posting that. She had >> problems in a store with some guy wearing a turban hassled her with a >> broom. I don't remember if that is the same store where the birds are >> always getting into the bread on the lower shelves. The list of lies >> and bizarre claims and denials is long. > > How do you know? Why do you care? Don't you have things to do? Real life > people to haunt? It makes you wonder. What a sad piece of shit he is. He hangs on her EVERY word for years and forgets nothing (he claims) she has ever said, but claims he doesn't like her and has no interest in her ????????? He is obsessed with her. I wonder how many more years he will follow her every move??? How many years we have to read of his continual stalking her! He is a sicko. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/ |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/10/2016 3:36 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-06-10 2:45 PM, Bruce wrote: >> I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the >> endless bickering that follows everything she says. >> > Seriously??? You have not seen any of Julie's bizarre comments or > realized that she is lying? This is a woman who had previously posted > about her husband stopping to eat supper on the way home and later > denied that she had posted that. She had claimed to be a writer but > later denied being a writer, denied having claimed that she was a > writer. When someone (not me) dug up her old posts with the claim that > she was a writer she said she didn't remember posting that. She had > problems in a store with some guy wearing a turban hassled her with a > broom. I don't remember if that is the same store where the birds are > always getting into the bread on the lower shelves. The list of lies > and bizarre claims and denials is long. > Do you just cut and paste that rant? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 04:45:56 +1000, Bruce >
wrote: > I haven't noticed any bizarre things or lies, but I also don't read the > endless bickering that follows everything she says. How about the multiple hundred reply "all about Julie" thread that someone started when she wasn't even posting to rfc? -- sf |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
family farms | General Cooking | |||
Walden Farms Caramel Dip | Diabetic | |||
Tea Farms in Japan | Tea | |||
Organic farms using NO pesticides better for soil and outproduceconventional farms. | Vegan | |||
Morning Farms | Vegan |