On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-4, Cheri wrote:
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 6/5/2016 12:51 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >>
> >> "Gary" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> sf wrote:
> >>
> >>>> Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
> >>>> think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
> >>>> - it's them.
> >>>
> >>> I agree with you. I've never noticed any bad taste from reheated meat.
> >>
> >> Me either, and I eat a lot of reheated meat.
> >>
> >> Cheri
> >
> > Same here. Guess that's plus 3 or something. I don't taste anything off.
> > Then again, perhaps we just know how to gently reheat cooked meat.
> >
> > Jill
>
> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to me
> reheated.

I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor. Then
again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.

Cindy Hamilton

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:07:39 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 6/5/2016 4:03 AM, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>> the marketing sig.
>>>
>>> I meant that Alex is a strange person for apparently only replying to
>>> you with odd comments. I agree about such sigs, it's not as though we
>>> want or need more commercialism on Usenet.
>>
>> Do you find it intrusive? It isn't bigger than many sigs.
>>
>I don't like the blatant advertising. I also shut off the sig line on my
>phone that says "sent from my Adroid somethingorother"
>
>I also dislike the car dealer signs on the back of cars. I take them off
>as soon as I get home from the dealer.


Gee, we have something in common, Ed.
Scary

On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 3:48:36 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 6:36:59 PM UTC-4, graham wrote:
> >> On 04/06/2016 3:58 PM, Je?us wrote:
> >> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:10:58 -0600, graham > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 04/06/2016 2:06 PM, Je?us wrote:
> >> >>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> I concur. Cheap and filling, and not at all the way that I eat, which is
> >> >>>> a lot of vegetables, a little meat, and not much carbs. Plus, I detest
> >> >>>> the taste of re-heated meat, unless it's in some strong-flavored sauce
> >> >>>> like barbecue sauce.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I've heard other people say that before about reheated meat.
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm with Cindy on this one! Even currying leftover meat can't remove
> >> >> that taste.
> >> >
> >> > Could you describe the taste please?
> >> >
> >> > Then again... if I know what to look for, I might find it myself :/
> >> > I have had reheated meat that wasn't particularly great, but usually
> >> > that was because it was too dry.
> >> >
> >> It's a sort of rancid *** metallic taste. To me, that is! I don't know
> >> how Cindy would describe it.
> >> Graham
> >
> >Sorry, the best I can do is "off". I guess that would map to your
> >"rancid". Kind of like cooked blood, maybe?
> >
> >Mind you, I don't like organ meat, lamb, or poultry dark meat, so
> >that probably relates to my dislike for reheated meat.
>
> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
> Do you like duck?

Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
of years since I've had it.

Cindy Hamilton

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:25:07 -0400, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 11:43:22 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:13:01 -0400, jmcquown >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>
>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>
>>>It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>the marketing sig.
>>
>>I meant that Alex is a strange person for apparently only replying to
>>you with odd comments. I agree about such sigs, it's not as though we
>>want or need more commercialism on Usenet.
>
>They can do as they like, affects me not, I simply delete their posts
>unopened... I've never yet found any of those type to contribute
>anything useful/entertaining. I quietly relegate them to my douchebag
>cemetery.

Same, although I occasionally comment on this guy who seems to stalk
Jill. His style just comes across as really creepy to me.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>
>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>
>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off the
>>> marketing sig.
>>
>> Then don't read my posts.
>>
>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.

He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
on improving things.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 3:48:36 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 06:54:20 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 6:36:59 PM UTC-4, graham wrote:
>> >> On 04/06/2016 3:58 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:10:58 -0600, graham > wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 04/06/2016 2:06 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> >> >>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> I concur. Cheap and filling, and not at all the way that I eat, which is
>> >> >>>> a lot of vegetables, a little meat, and not much carbs. Plus, I detest
>> >> >>>> the taste of re-heated meat, unless it's in some strong-flavored sauce
>> >> >>>> like barbecue sauce.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I've heard other people say that before about reheated meat.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I'm with Cindy on this one! Even currying leftover meat can't remove
>> >> >> that taste.
>> >> >
>> >> > Could you describe the taste please?
>> >> >
>> >> > Then again... if I know what to look for, I might find it myself :/
>> >> > I have had reheated meat that wasn't particularly great, but usually
>> >> > that was because it was too dry.
>> >> >
>> >> It's a sort of rancid *** metallic taste. To me, that is! I don't know
>> >> how Cindy would describe it.
>> >> Graham
>> >
>> >Sorry, the best I can do is "off". I guess that would map to your
>> >"rancid". Kind of like cooked blood, maybe?
>> >
>> >Mind you, I don't like organ meat, lamb, or poultry dark meat, so
>> >that probably relates to my dislike for reheated meat.
>>
>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>> Do you like duck?
>
>Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>of years since I've had it.

Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
One of my favourites, I have to say

I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>
>>>>Tomorrow (Sunday) I have roast pork with apple sauce, roast potatoes,
>>>>steamed black kale (fresh from the garden) and whatever other veg takes
>>>>my
>>>>fancy)
>>>
>>> Sounds really nice, I'm a big fan of kale and also have it in the
>>> garden. I'm overdue for roast pork with apple sauce, yum. Must do
>>> something about that.
>>>
>>> I have most of a cabbage to use up, so I'll use that today rather than
>>> kale. I might do some roast pumpkin soup while I'm at it today as
>>> well, I was going to make potato and leek but I think I'll just put
>>> the leek into the braise.
>>
>>You have reminded me I have potato and leek soup in the freezer. I will
>>get
>>some out today
>
> Hope you enjoyed it. I never got around to making soup yesterday but I
> should today... another day of relentless rain so I'll be inside all
> day again. Pumpkin soup sounds good to me.
>
> I wouldn't be surprised if I'm flooded in at this stage. No end in
> sight until Wednesday, when *another* big low just like this one is
> due to replace this one... I might need my snorkel and flippers

Oh dear ... lol

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 09:03:30 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:13:01 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>
>>>>It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>>the marketing sig.
>>>
>>> I meant that Alex is a strange person for apparently only replying to
>>> you with odd comments. I agree about such sigs, it's not as though we
>>> want or need more commercialism on Usenet.
>>
>>Do you find it intrusive?
>
> I was going to say no, but perhaps just a little, what with the URL
> and all.
>
>>It isn't bigger than many sigs.
>
> True, it wasn't the size of it that was an issue.
> Not that the sig was a major issue to begin with for me, I just added
> my thoughts on the matter.

OK

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 05/06/2016 2:13 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-4, Cheri wrote:
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/5/2016 12:51 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
>>>>>> think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
>>>>>> - it's them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with you. I've never noticed any bad taste from reheated meat.
>>>>
>>>> Me either, and I eat a lot of reheated meat.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> Same here. Guess that's plus 3 or something. I don't taste anything off.
>>> Then again, perhaps we just know how to gently reheat cooked meat.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
>> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to me
>> reheated.
>
> I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor. Then
> again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
> leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
> chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.
Graham

On 05/06/2016 2:08 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 1:48:51 PM UTC-4, Janet B wrote:
>> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 13:10:21 -0400, Brooklyn1
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 06:57:11 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Saturday, June 4, 2016 at 7:46:22 PM UTC-4, sf wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 16:38:59 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/06/2016 4:36 PM, graham wrote:
>>>>>>> On 04/06/2016 3:58 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 14:10:58 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 04/06/2016 2:06 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 04:14:43 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I concur. Cheap and filling, and not at all the way that I eat,
>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>> a lot of vegetables, a little meat, and not much carbs. Plus, I
>>>>>>>>>>> detest
>>>>>>>>>>> the taste of re-heated meat, unless it's in some strong-flavored sauce
>>>>>>>>>>> like barbecue sauce.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've heard other people say that before about reheated meat.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm with Cindy on this one! Even currying leftover meat can't remove
>>>>>>>>> that taste.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Could you describe the taste please?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then again... if I know what to look for, I might find it myself :/
>>>>>>>> I have had reheated meat that wasn't particularly great, but usually
>>>>>>>> that was because it was too dry.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It's a sort of rancid *** metallic taste. To me, that is! I don't know
>>>>>>> how Cindy would describe it.
>>>>>>> Graham
>>>>>> Note that this only affects reheated roasted, grilled or fried meat, not
>>>>>> stews.
>>>>>> Graham
>>>>>
>>>>> I can only say: that's odd. Maybe it's the kind of meat you buy,
>>>>> maybe I don't eat enough reheated meat to notice.
>>>>
>>>> I doubt that Graham and I buy the same kind of meat, yet we experience
>>>> similar reactions. It's worst with pork and chicken breast; I can
>>>> tolerate a little gently reheated prime rib, for example.
>>>> As I posted upthread, reheated meat is ok with barbecue sauce. Mine
>>>> is quite acidic, and I reheat the meat in the sauce, so perhaps that's
>>>> the key.
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>> Cold left over roast chicken reheated in soup is excellent, maybe
>>> yoose don't know how to reheat cooked meat... either add small bits to
>>> the served hot soup or braise till it falls from the bone.
>>
>> Or perhaps our tastes are just so much more refined than yours is
>> Janet US
>
> LOL. I don't know if I'd call it "refined". Everybody's sensory apparatus
> is different. Don't forget that Sheldon doesn't like bacon. That's
> downright un-American.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
I'd say "inhuman":-)
Graham

On 2016-06-05 4:13 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
>> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to me
>> reheated.
>
> I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor. Then
> again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
> leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
> chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.

We tend to avoid some roasts because of the leftover issue. I like
leftover chicken cold. Leftover roast beef is great heated up gently in
gravy. I make a curry sauce for lamb and it is delicious. I learned a
couple tricks for stew years ago. First of all, the meat should be
browned before adding the braising liquid. Secondly, it is best made a
day ahead and then reheated the next day.

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-4, Cheri wrote:
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 6/5/2016 12:51 PM, Cheri wrote:
>> >>
>> >> "Gary" > wrote in message
>> >> ...
>> >>> sf wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>> Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people
>> >>>> who
>> >>>> think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's
>> >>>> fault
>> >>>> - it's them.
>> >>>
>> >>> I agree with you. I've never noticed any bad taste from reheated
>> >>> meat.
>> >>
>> >> Me either, and I eat a lot of reheated meat.
>> >>
>> >> Cheri
>> >
>> > Same here. Guess that's plus 3 or something. I don't taste anything
>> > off.
>> > Then again, perhaps we just know how to gently reheat cooked meat.
>> >
>> > Jill
>>
>> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
>> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to
>> me
>> reheated.
>
> I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor.
> Then
> again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
> leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
> chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Well, there ya go.

Cheri

On 2016-06-05 4:29 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton

>>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>>> Do you like duck?
>>
>> Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>> of years since I've had it.
>
> Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
> One of my favourites, I have to say
>

I like duck a lot. I have not been successful cooking it. Of the dozen
or so times I cooked it I only had decent results once. It has since
been relegated to a restaurant meal, something I like but cannot cook
for myself.

> I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.

I understand that it was quite popular in Europe for a while, and I can
see how people who immigrated from there were quick to convert to turkey.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:48:22 -0600, graham > wrote:

>I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
>turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
>the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.

What about things like chicken stock or other stock with meat/bones in
it?

For me, the closest issue to this that I can think of right now is
broccoli. I like broccoli, but make a soup out of it and I'll nearly
gag.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 16:53:30 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>I learned a
>couple tricks for stew years ago. First of all, the meat should be
>browned before adding the braising liquid.

Absolutely. Yes, it will still come out nice if you do not brown the
meat first, but the caramelisation makes it twice as good.

I made a lamb braise (stew?) yesterday. My method is to firstly brown
the meat (which yesterday happened to be a backstrap, no less), then I
remove the meat and lightly brown the onion, potatoes, carrots,
garlic, leeks or anything else like that - I'll also add seasonings at
this point - then return the meat and add other veggies such as peas,
cabbage or whatever. I then half submerge all that with stock and/or
white wine plus some water. Let it simmer for two hours, then turn the
meat over and let it go for at least another two hours. Because I
usually have a wood fire going, it'll simmer all day.


>Secondly, it is best made a
>day ahead and then reheated the next day.

Yep. Much like many pasta dishes. I'm contemplating whether to have
some of my braise on toast for breakfast this morning or not.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:44:31 -0600, graham > wrote:

> On 05/06/2016 8:59 AM, sf wrote:
> >
> > Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
> > think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
> > - it's them.
> >
> I've considered that but surely, the anomaly is in those who can't
> detect the "off" flavours:-)
> Graham

I've never heard of anyone with that complaint before this and there
would be a lot less reheating of leftovers if it was that big of a
deal.

--

sf

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>
>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>
>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>> the
>>> marketing sig.
>>
>> Then don't read my posts.
>>
> Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
> advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.

Not a hardship at all. It's not like I even post all that much anymore. I
may just lose Usenet altogether. But think of it like an old Vaudeville
skit.

"Doctor, it worts whemn I do this"

Well don't do that.

......

OK it is funnier when Henny Youngman did it.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/5/2016 11:41 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>>> I don't like the blatant advertising. I also shut off the sig line on my
>>> phone that says "sent from my Adroid somethingorother"
>>>
>>> I also dislike the car dealer signs on the back of cars. I take them off
>>> as soon as I get home from the dealer.
>>
>> Buy a lot of cars, I take it?
>>
>
> About every two or three years. Used to be more when the kids were home,
> but my wife no longer drives so we only have one car now.
>
> Some dealers use a small sticker or badge, but some have obnoxious (to me)
> billboards sometimes applied crooked. That annoys me.
>
> People have come to accept that when they spend tens of thousands of
> dollars on a new car the dealer can plaster advertising on it. Have you
> ever seen a house with a plaque stating "bought from Shady Reators"?

That's a lot of cars.

Buying them is a waste of money if you go through them faster than a gallon
jar of pickles. Leasing would be smarter in your case.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>
>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>> the
>>>> marketing sig.
>>>
>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>
>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>
> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
> on improving things.

I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>>> the
>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>
>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>
>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>
>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>> on improving things.
>
>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.

....and... pretty much the response I expected.
You're such a tool when you get upset.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>> off
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>
>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>
>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>> on improving things.
>>
>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>
> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
> You're such a tool when you get upset.


It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>
>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>>> on improving things.
>>>
>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>
>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>
>
>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.

LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
that you got nearly everyone odd-side.

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:15:45 -0500, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 19:45:39 -0400, jmcquown wrote:
>
>> There's a place on Lady's Island (which is where my grocery stores and
>> other main shops are located) that calls itself a Meat Market. I'm on
>> their mailing list. And it's true, it *is* a butcher shop. They do
>> sell custom cut meats. It's owned by a husband/wife team. Therein lies
>> the problem.
>>
>> She fancies herself a cook. She is always pushing her pre-prepared (aka
>> home cooked) meals. I get an email every couple of weeks. How do these
>> selections sound to you?
>>
>> "From the prepared meals department we have turkey and spinach stuffing
>> casserole, Gruyere chicken and pasta bake, lasagna, corned beef, cabbage
>> and mashed potatoes and tomato, sausage and cheddar bread pudding
>> casserole."
>
>Except for the Tomato, Sausage, Cheddar Bread Pudding <gag>, it sound
>like the prepared meal mains they would sell at our upscale grocer.
>I've never had an occasion I've felt the need to buy anything like
>that, but a lot of people do that. I just turn to Stouffers red box
>entrees. But their Lasagna seems to have gone downhill lately - it
>was mostly sauce last couple times I've had it.
>
>Looks like Islands Meat Market used to be pretty active on Facebook
>and then they just stopped posting cold turkey 5 years ago.
>
>-sw

I would think that the tomato, sausage and cheddar bread pudding would
be good. I think your gag comes from thinking of it as bread pudding
(a sweet). Think of it savory instead like one of the (what do they
call them?) breakfast casserole.
http://tinyurl.com/zmearx8
I've never done one with tomatoes, but I bet with cherry or grape
tomatoes it would be great. You could veer it toward Mexican with
some chilies and cilantro. I often do similar for Sunday night
supper. For me, it is a great way to finish off the loaf of bread I
baked during the week that is going stale. It can be eaten hot, cold
or room temperature. Similar to a frittata.
Janet US

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:48:22 -0600, graham > wrote:

>On 05/06/2016 2:13 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-4, Cheri wrote:
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 6/5/2016 12:51 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
>>>>>>> think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
>>>>>>> - it's them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with you. I've never noticed any bad taste from reheated meat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Me either, and I eat a lot of reheated meat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheri
>>>>
>>>> Same here. Guess that's plus 3 or something. I don't taste anything off.
>>>> Then again, perhaps we just know how to gently reheat cooked meat.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
>>> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to me
>>> reheated.
>>
>> I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor. Then
>> again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
>> leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
>> chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
>turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
>the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.
>Graham

YES! I don't make turkey soup anymore.
Do you detect sweetness in potatoes, broccoli, cabbage, that sort of
thing? Can you smell the sweetness? I can.
Janet US

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the
>>>>>>>>>>> cog
>>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>>>> on improving things.
>>>>
>>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>>
>>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>>
>>
>>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.
>
> LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
> you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
> that you got nearly everyone odd-side.

Meltdown? You seem to be easily excited. Me thinks you are projecting a
bit too much.

Care to refresh my memory? LOL. Meltodown.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:13:50 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:48:22 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>>I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
>>turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
>>the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.
>
>What about things like chicken stock or other stock with meat/bones in
>it?
>
>For me, the closest issue to this that I can think of right now is
>broccoli. I like broccoli, but make a soup out of it and I'll nearly
>gag.

for me, the crucifers are way too strong for soup (except for
cabbage). I like to put cabbage in a vegetable soup.
Janet US

On 05/06/2016 4:28 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:48:22 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 05/06/2016 2:13 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> On Sunday, June 5, 2016 at 2:12:03 PM UTC-4, Cheri wrote:
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 6/5/2016 12:51 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
>>>>>>>> think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
>>>>>>>> - it's them.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree with you. I've never noticed any bad taste from reheated meat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Me either, and I eat a lot of reheated meat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheri
>>>>>
>>>>> Same here. Guess that's plus 3 or something. I don't taste anything off.
>>>>> Then again, perhaps we just know how to gently reheat cooked meat.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>> If that were true for me, I would waste a lot since I do freeze leftover
>>>> meatloaf, ribs, etc. for another day. Thankfully, it all tastes good to me
>>>> reheated.
>>>
>>> I know how to gently reheat cooked meat; I just don't like the flavor. Then
>>> again, I don't make meatloaf (neither of us likes it), ribs, etc. The
>>> leftover meat that I most commonly have is grilled, skinless, boneless
>>> chicken breast. It almost always ends up sliced and on a salad.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>> I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
>> turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
>> the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.
>> Graham
>
> YES! I don't make turkey soup anymore.
> Do you detect sweetness in potatoes, broccoli, cabbage, that sort of
> thing? Can you smell the sweetness? I can.
> Janet US
>
I can certainly taste it, and yes, I can smell it too, but not in
broccoli - that's still a bit sulphurous:-)
Graham

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:45:12 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>
>>>>>Tomorrow (Sunday) I have roast pork with apple sauce, roast potatoes,
>>>>>steamed black kale (fresh from the garden) and whatever other veg takes
>>>>>my
>>>>>fancy)
>>>>
>>>> Sounds really nice, I'm a big fan of kale and also have it in the
>>>> garden. I'm overdue for roast pork with apple sauce, yum. Must do
>>>> something about that.
>>>>
>>>> I have most of a cabbage to use up, so I'll use that today rather than
>>>> kale. I might do some roast pumpkin soup while I'm at it today as
>>>> well, I was going to make potato and leek but I think I'll just put
>>>> the leek into the braise.
>>>
>>>You have reminded me I have potato and leek soup in the freezer. I will
>>>get
>>>some out today
>>
>> Hope you enjoyed it. I never got around to making soup yesterday but I
>> should today... another day of relentless rain so I'll be inside all
>> day again. Pumpkin soup sounds good to me.
>>
>> I wouldn't be surprised if I'm flooded in at this stage. No end in
>> sight until Wednesday, when *another* big low just like this one is
>> due to replace this one... I might need my snorkel and flippers
>
>Oh dear ... lol

Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
hands once it dries up...

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 16:30:41 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:

>On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 07:13:50 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:48:22 -0600, graham > wrote:
>>
>>>I detect similar "off" flavours when in the past, I made soup from the
>>>turkey carcass. The last one I roasted, I gave the boys care packages of
>>>the breast meat, stripped the dark meat for myself and dumped the carcass.
>>
>>What about things like chicken stock or other stock with meat/bones in
>>it?
>>
>>For me, the closest issue to this that I can think of right now is
>>broccoli. I like broccoli, but make a soup out of it and I'll nearly
>>gag.
>
>for me, the crucifers are way too strong for soup (except for
>cabbage). I like to put cabbage in a vegetable soup.

Yes, cabbage is good, as is cauliflower IMO. I don't mind kale either.

On 2016-06-05 7:23 PM, Je�us wrote:

> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
> hands once it dries up...
>


Bummer. Floods are not fun.
I wish we had more rain. We had a very long, cool spring. There was not
much snow during the winter, and not a lot of rain in the spring, so
there is no a lot of ground water. I expect that my well will be low. I
checked my cistern today and ran a pump in it for 8 hours to liven up
the water and rid it of any funkiness.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:29:50 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-05 7:23 PM, Je?us wrote:
>
>> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
>> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
>> hands once it dries up...
>
>Bummer. Floods are not fun.
>
>I wish we had more rain.
>We had a very long, cool spring. There was not
>much snow during the winter, and not a lot of rain in the spring, so
>there is no a lot of ground water.

Similar to here. We just went through our driest spring and summer on
record... the rain is badly needed, especially as the state's dams are
getting seriously low and required for hydro power. But it would be
nice if it was portioned out a little more...

>I expect that my well will be low. I
>checked my cistern today and ran a pump in it for 8 hours to liven up
>the water and rid it of any funkiness.

Good idea.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:29:50 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-05 7:23 PM, Je?us wrote:
>
>> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
>> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
>> hands once it dries up...
>>
>
>
>Bummer. Floods are not fun.
>I wish we had more rain. We had a very long, cool spring. There was not
>much snow during the winter, and not a lot of rain in the spring, so
>there is no a lot of ground water. I expect that my well will be low. I
>checked my cistern today and ran a pump in it for 8 hours to liven up
>the water and rid it of any funkiness.

I'm sorry to hear that. The silt left behind by flood waters turns to
cement.
Janet US

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:30:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the
>>>>>>>>>>>> cog
>>>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>>>>> on improving things.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>>>
>>>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>>>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>>>
>>>
>>>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.
>>
>> LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
>> you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
>> that you got nearly everyone odd-side.
>
>Meltdown? You seem to be easily excited. Me thinks you are projecting a
>bit too much.
>
>Care to refresh my memory?

Nope. Can't be arsed searching for it, especially with the limited
bandwidth I have.

> LOL. Meltodown.

On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 18:13:04 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:

>On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 19:29:50 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2016-06-05 7:23 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>
>>> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
>>> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
>>> hands once it dries up...
>>>
>>
>>
>>Bummer. Floods are not fun.
>>I wish we had more rain. We had a very long, cool spring. There was not
>>much snow during the winter, and not a lot of rain in the spring, so
>>there is no a lot of ground water. I expect that my well will be low. I
>>checked my cistern today and ran a pump in it for 8 hours to liven up
>>the water and rid it of any funkiness.
>
>I'm sorry to hear that. The silt left behind by flood waters turns to
>cement.

Thanks, It's bad when that happens alright. Luckily silt won't be much
of a problem for me, but I have fences that will need replacing and
one shed does have some water in it.

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:08:26 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-05 4:29 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>
>>>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>>>> Do you like duck?
>>>
>>> Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>>> of years since I've had it.
>>
>> Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
>> One of my favourites, I have to say
>>
>
>I like duck a lot. I have not been successful cooking it. Of the dozen
>or so times I cooked it I only had decent results once. It has since
>been relegated to a restaurant meal, something I like but cannot cook
>for myself.

I tend to slow cook duck, as I do a lot of meat and it comes out great
for me. Roast duck is good too, although it requires a little more
care than a chicken.

>> I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.
>
>I understand that it was quite popular in Europe for a while, and I can
>see how people who immigrated from there were quick to convert to turkey.

Turkey to me is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and a little too
bland for my tastes. That's not to say I can't enjoy turkey though.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:30:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
t...
>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> cog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT
>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to
>>>>>>>>>> turn
>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's
>>>>>>> thoughts
>>>>>>> on improving things.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>>>>
>>>>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>>>>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.
>>>
>>> LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
>>> you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
>>> that you got nearly everyone odd-side.
>>
>>Meltdown? You seem to be easily excited. Me thinks you are projecting a
>>bit too much.
>>
>>Care to refresh my memory?
>
> Nope. Can't be arsed searching for it, especially with the limited
> bandwidth I have.

Didn't think so. Burden of proof BTW resides with the prosecution, Mr.
Pixel.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...


"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>
>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>
>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off the
>>>> marketing sig.
>>>
>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>
>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>
> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
> on improving things.

I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.

===========

LOL, but, but, but, you should take into account other peoples ideas of
improving things...for themselves of course. There's a lot of that going around,
and not just here.

Cheri

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:38:58 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:30:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
et...
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to
>>>>>>>>>>> turn
>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's
>>>>>>>> thoughts
>>>>>>>> on improving things.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>>>>>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.
>>>>
>>>> LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
>>>> you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
>>>> that you got nearly everyone odd-side.
>>>
>>>Meltdown? You seem to be easily excited. Me thinks you are projecting a
>>>bit too much.
>>>
>>>Care to refresh my memory?
>>
>> Nope. Can't be arsed searching for it, especially with the limited
>> bandwidth I have.
>
>Didn't think so. Burden of proof BTW resides with the prosecution, Mr.
>Pixel.

You'd only refute it anyway, no matter what it was. Not worth spending
a few hours looking for it with about 22kbps at my disposal. 'mr
pixel' WTF is that supposed to be. You were speculating about leaving
Usenet before - maybe you should.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
news
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:38:58 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:30:20 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 15:03:57 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
t...
>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 14:50:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>news:3729lb9nvckj37d63kka24v4a2kesmmsvs@j. net...
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to
>>>>>>>>>>>> turn
>>>>>>>>>>>> off
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the
>>>>>>>>>>free
>>>>>>>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's
>>>>>>>>> thoughts
>>>>>>>>> on improving things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...and... pretty much the response I expected.
>>>>>>> You're such a tool when you get upset.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It takes more than a few pixels on a screen to upset me.
>>>>>
>>>>> LOL. Oh really? I guess you've already forgotten about the meltdown
>>>>> you had in here a year or so ago. You made *such* a dick of yourself
>>>>> that you got nearly everyone odd-side.
>>>>
>>>>Meltdown? You seem to be easily excited. Me thinks you are projecting
>>>>a
>>>>bit too much.
>>>>
>>>>Care to refresh my memory?
>>>
>>> Nope. Can't be arsed searching for it, especially with the limited
>>> bandwidth I have.
>>
>>Didn't think so. Burden of proof BTW resides with the prosecution, Mr.
>>Pixel.
>
> You'd only refute it anyway, no matter what it was. Not worth spending
> a few hours looking for it with about 22kbps at my disposal. 'mr
> pixel' WTF is that supposed to be. You were speculating about leaving
> Usenet before - maybe you should.

Upset are we? Google "projection" and I don't mean TV.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>
>
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off
>>>>> the
>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>
>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>
>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>
>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>> on improving things.
>
> I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>
> ===========
>
> LOL, but, but, but, you should take into account other peoples ideas of
> improving things...for themselves of course. There's a lot of that going
> around, and not just here.


Perhaps I have been selfish? I mean when you think about it Jill is just
trying to make the world a better place for Jill.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus