"Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...


"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>
>
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>> ...
>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it. No
>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>
>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn off the
>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>
>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>
>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>
>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>> on improving things.
>
> I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>
> ===========
>
> LOL, but, but, but, you should take into account other peoples ideas of
> improving things...for themselves of course. There's a lot of that going
> around, and not just here.


Perhaps I have been selfish? I mean when you think about it Jill is just
trying to make the world a better place for Jill.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past couple of
days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.

Cheri

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>> off the
>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>
>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>
>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>> on improving things.
>>
>> I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>
>> ===========
>>
>> LOL, but, but, but, you should take into account other peoples ideas of
>> improving things...for themselves of course. There's a lot of that going
>> around, and not just here.
>
>
> Perhaps I have been selfish? I mean when you think about it Jill is just
> trying to make the world a better place for Jill.
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
> couple of days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.

Indeed. Tis but a pimple on a flea. Although one does have to wonder what
such a leisurely existance might be like, one free of any real meaning or of
life's challenges that make us stronger and keeps our perspective on what is
important.




---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:44:23 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past couple of
> days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.

I always notice sigs and when I see one like that, I assume whoever it
is doesn't know how to delete it. Jill told him how, he got all huffy
and said he doesn't want to... so now we know.

--

sf

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:44:23 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
>> couple of
>> days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.
>
> I always notice sigs and when I see one like that, I assume whoever it
> is doesn't know how to delete it. Jill told him how, he got all huffy
> and said he doesn't want to... so now we know.
>
> --
>
> sf

I only notice offensive (to me) sigs, but noticing and commenting are two
different things. Why anybody would care about his sig is beyond me, but
such is life.

Cheri

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:44:23 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
>> couple of
>> days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.
>
> I always notice sigs and when I see one like that, I assume whoever it
> is doesn't know how to delete it. Jill told him how, he got all huffy
> and said he doesn't want to... so now we know.

I have over 30 years in IT, I worked on the very protocols used by Usenet
when I was ijn college. I was posting to newsgroups in 1983.

Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
please the ego of a Internet spook.

TJs sucks.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 6/6/2016 12:00 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
> Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
> please the ego of a Internet spook.

Hey! I didn't know I was an Internet spook! At the very most, a net
cop. Back in the bozo bin, Paul.

Jill

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/5/2016 12:31 PM, sf wrote:
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:14:23 -0400, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>
>>> People have come to accept that when they spend tens of thousands of
>>> dollars on a new car the dealer can plaster advertising on it. Have you
>>> ever seen a house with a plaque stating "bought from Shady Reators"?
>>
>> I haven't seen those stickers in years, dealers out here put their
>> names on the license plate... which is easy enough to remove and
>> replace without damaging the finish.
>
> I still see the stickers occasionally, or those plastic signs stuck
> on the paint.
>
> It's easy enough to avoid, I always tell the dealer I don't want a
> sticker. I don't put stickers on my car, I sure as hell don't
> want to drive around with an ad stuck to it.


I am 54,.I have owned 2 vehicles in m life Why do I feel like I am ... I
dunno ... unAmerican?



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:00:44 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:44:23 -0700, "Cheri" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
> >> couple of
> >> days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.
> >
> > I always notice sigs and when I see one like that, I assume whoever it
> > is doesn't know how to delete it. Jill told him how, he got all huffy
> > and said he doesn't want to... so now we know.
>
> I have over 30 years in IT, I worked on the very protocols used by Usenet
> when I was ijn college. I was posting to newsgroups in 1983.

I don't want to hire you for anything.
>
> Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
> please the ego of a Internet spook.

There it is.
>
> TJs sucks.
>
You felt the need to say that, why? Never mind, I don't want to know
because I don't care - so go to Julie's corner with your opinion.
IMO, you're just another one who thinks TJ's should be a full service
grocery store and it's not. So stiff upper lip old chap, your day
will improve.

--

sf

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
news
> On 6/6/2016 12:00 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>> Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
>> please the ego of a Internet spook.
>
> Hey! I didn't know I was an Internet spook! At the very most, a net cop.
> Back in the bozo bin, Paul.

Whatever.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

"sf" > wrote in message
news
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:00:44 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 18:44:23 -0700, "Cheri" >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
>> >> couple of
>> >> days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.
>> >
>> > I always notice sigs and when I see one like that, I assume whoever it
>> > is doesn't know how to delete it. Jill told him how, he got all huffy
>> > and said he doesn't want to... so now we know.
>>
>> I have over 30 years in IT, I worked on the very protocols used by
>> Usenet
>> when I was ijn college. I was posting to newsgroups in 1983.
>
> I don't want to hire you for anything.

What you'd hire me for I don't sell. I may be easy but I am not cheap.

>>
>> Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
>> please the ego of a Internet spook.
>
> There it is.
>>
>> TJs sucks.
>>
> You felt the need to say that, why? Never mind, I don't want to know
> because I don't care - so go to Julie's corner with your opinion.
> IMO, you're just another one who thinks TJ's should be a full service
> grocery store and it's not. So stiff upper lip old chap, your day
> will improve.

Yoiu care. TJs is for poor people who want to be seen. If you like e-coli
in your meat, it is the place to go.





---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Paul M. Cook formulated on Monday :

> Trust me, I can turn off a sig if I want to. I do not care to do it to
> please the ego of a Internet spook.
>
> TJs sucks.
>
>
>
> ---
> This poster is too stoopid to turn this sig off.
>



LOL!

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:45:12 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>>>Tomorrow (Sunday) I have roast pork with apple sauce, roast potatoes,
>>>>>>steamed black kale (fresh from the garden) and whatever other veg
>>>>>>takes
>>>>>>my
>>>>>>fancy)
>>>>>
>>>>> Sounds really nice, I'm a big fan of kale and also have it in the
>>>>> garden. I'm overdue for roast pork with apple sauce, yum. Must do
>>>>> something about that.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have most of a cabbage to use up, so I'll use that today rather than
>>>>> kale. I might do some roast pumpkin soup while I'm at it today as
>>>>> well, I was going to make potato and leek but I think I'll just put
>>>>> the leek into the braise.
>>>>
>>>>You have reminded me I have potato and leek soup in the freezer. I will
>>>>get
>>>>some out today
>>>
>>> Hope you enjoyed it. I never got around to making soup yesterday but I
>>> should today... another day of relentless rain so I'll be inside all
>>> day again. Pumpkin soup sounds good to me.
>>>
>>> I wouldn't be surprised if I'm flooded in at this stage. No end in
>>> sight until Wednesday, when *another* big low just like this one is
>>> due to replace this one... I might need my snorkel and flippers
>>
>>Oh dear ... lol
>
> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
> hands once it dries up...

Bad news! I am very sorry to hear that( We travelled down the farm today
and all the rivers were very low. Not seen that in a ages!


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:08:26 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>>On 2016-06-05 4:29 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>
>>>>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>>>>> Do you like duck?
>>>>
>>>> Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>>>> of years since I've had it.
>>>
>>> Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
>>> One of my favourites, I have to say
>>>
>>
>>I like duck a lot. I have not been successful cooking it. Of the dozen
>>or so times I cooked it I only had decent results once. It has since
>>been relegated to a restaurant meal, something I like but cannot cook
>>for myself.
>
> I tend to slow cook duck, as I do a lot of meat and it comes out great
> for me. Roast duck is good too, although it requires a little more
> care than a chicken.
>
>>> I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.
>>
>>I understand that it was quite popular in Europe for a while, and I can
>>see how people who immigrated from there were quick to convert to turkey.
>
> Turkey to me is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and a little too
> bland for my tastes. That's not to say I can't enjoy turkey though.

When I am making pies with wild rabbit and pigeon etc, I add some turkey to
tone down the gaminess.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Paul M. Cook" wrote in message ...
>>
>>
>> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 11:49:16 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 6/5/2016 12:33 AM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 6/4/2016 9:07 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sat, 4 Jun 2016 21:03:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 6/3/2016 11:59 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus
>>>>>>>>>> software.
>>>>>>>>>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey Paul, would you mind? Open Avast, click on settings (the cog
>>>>>>>>> icon). Where it says Enable Avast email signature, DESELECT it.
>>>>>>>>> No
>>>>>>>>> one cares what A/V software you're using.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does that upset you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You're a very strange person.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't upset me, it's just annoying. It's easy enough to turn
>>>>>> off the
>>>>>> marketing sig.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then don't read my posts.
>>>>>
>>>>Okay, I won't. If it's such a hardship for you to turn off the free
>>>>advertising, I'll skip right over anything you have to say.
>>>
>>> He's just another one who 'doesnt want to be told what to do' for the
>>> sake of it, rather than at least take on board other people's thoughts
>>> on improving things.
>>
>> I don't like whiners. Some people's worlds are just too small.
>>
>> ===========
>>
>> LOL, but, but, but, you should take into account other peoples ideas of
>> improving things...for themselves of course. There's a lot of that going
>> around, and not just here.
>
>
> Perhaps I have been selfish? I mean when you think about it Jill is just
> trying to make the world a better place for Jill.
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
>
> Honestly, I don't think I've ever even noticed your sig until the past
> couple of days, and it surely does not bother me in the least.

Agreed! I hadn't noticed either and it doesn't seem to be worse than the
average sig.



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 12:44:31 -0600, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 05/06/2016 8:59 AM, sf wrote:
>> >
>> > Maybe it's due to some sort of a genetic anomaly, like the people who
>> > think cilantro tastes like soap have. IOW, it's not the food's fault
>> > - it's them.
>> >
>> I've considered that but surely, the anomaly is in those who can't
>> detect the "off" flavours:-)
>> Graham
>
> I've never heard of anyone with that complaint before this and there
> would be a lot less reheating of leftovers if it was that big of a
> deal.

Yeah.

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:58:57 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:08:26 -0400, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>>On 2016-06-05 4:29 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>
>>>>>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>>>>>> Do you like duck?
>>>>>
>>>>> Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>>>>> of years since I've had it.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
>>>> One of my favourites, I have to say
>>>>
>>>
>>>I like duck a lot. I have not been successful cooking it. Of the dozen
>>>or so times I cooked it I only had decent results once. It has since
>>>been relegated to a restaurant meal, something I like but cannot cook
>>>for myself.
>>
>> I tend to slow cook duck, as I do a lot of meat and it comes out great
>> for me. Roast duck is good too, although it requires a little more
>> care than a chicken.
>>
>>>> I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.
>>>
>>>I understand that it was quite popular in Europe for a while, and I can
>>>see how people who immigrated from there were quick to convert to turkey.
>>
>> Turkey to me is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and a little too
>> bland for my tastes. That's not to say I can't enjoy turkey though.
>
>When I am making pies with wild rabbit and pigeon etc, I add some turkey to
>tone down the gaminess.

That's a great idea O, I never thought of that. Thanks

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:03:11 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:45:12 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tomorrow (Sunday) I have roast pork with apple sauce, roast potatoes,
>>>>>>>steamed black kale (fresh from the garden) and whatever other veg
>>>>>>>takes
>>>>>>>my
>>>>>>>fancy)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sounds really nice, I'm a big fan of kale and also have it in the
>>>>>> garden. I'm overdue for roast pork with apple sauce, yum. Must do
>>>>>> something about that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have most of a cabbage to use up, so I'll use that today rather than
>>>>>> kale. I might do some roast pumpkin soup while I'm at it today as
>>>>>> well, I was going to make potato and leek but I think I'll just put
>>>>>> the leek into the braise.
>>>>>
>>>>>You have reminded me I have potato and leek soup in the freezer. I will
>>>>>get
>>>>>some out today
>>>>
>>>> Hope you enjoyed it. I never got around to making soup yesterday but I
>>>> should today... another day of relentless rain so I'll be inside all
>>>> day again. Pumpkin soup sounds good to me.
>>>>
>>>> I wouldn't be surprised if I'm flooded in at this stage. No end in
>>>> sight until Wednesday, when *another* big low just like this one is
>>>> due to replace this one... I might need my snorkel and flippers
>>>
>>>Oh dear ... lol
>>
>> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
>> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
>> hands once it dries up...
>
>Bad news! I am very sorry to hear that( We travelled down the farm today
>and all the rivers were very low. Not seen that in a ages!

Things have settled down a bit for now, it's just breaking daylight
here and I'll go for a walk soon. I can still hear the creek roaring
from where I'm sitting right now, so I would say I'm still stranded in
the immediate area. We've had something like 300mm (or 11") of rain in
the past three days...

On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 11:09:25 +1000, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 17:13:29 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>wrote:
>
>>It is not misconfigured, it is configured.
>
>Oh. How quaint, a three dash sig delimiter...
>Funny how mine and other news clients don't recognise it and your sig
>is still in my reply below
>
>>---
>>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>https://www.avast.com/antivirus

I've done some further digging on this, and it seems that Avast has
intentionally broken the signature delimiter to circumvent email and
news clients from automatically removing the sig from any replies.

How decent of them to disregard long established protocols, all in a
bid to get some cheap advertising. Never did like Avast anyway, there
are and have always been better choices out there.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:58:57 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 17:08:26 -0400, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2016-06-05 4:29 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:15:30 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>>>>
>>>>>>> To me, that sounds like you dislike anything gamey?
>>>>>>> Do you like duck?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not very much. I'll eat it occasionally, but it's been a couple
>>>>>> of years since I've had it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, I suspected that would be the case, being a dark meat.
>>>>> One of my favourites, I have to say
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I like duck a lot. I have not been successful cooking it. Of the dozen
>>>>or so times I cooked it I only had decent results once. It has since
>>>>been relegated to a restaurant meal, something I like but cannot cook
>>>>for myself.
>>>
>>> I tend to slow cook duck, as I do a lot of meat and it comes out great
>>> for me. Roast duck is good too, although it requires a little more
>>> care than a chicken.
>>>
>>>>> I find goose a bit too strong for my tastes.
>>>>
>>>>I understand that it was quite popular in Europe for a while, and I can
>>>>see how people who immigrated from there were quick to convert to
>>>>turkey.
>>>
>>> Turkey to me is at the opposite end of the spectrum, and a little too
>>> bland for my tastes. That's not to say I can't enjoy turkey though.
>>
>>When I am making pies with wild rabbit and pigeon etc, I add some turkey
>>to
>>tone down the gaminess.
>
> That's a great idea O, I never thought of that. Thanks

Could be worth a try for you. Let me know how it goes if you do.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 18:03:11 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:45:12 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 08:43:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tomorrow (Sunday) I have roast pork with apple sauce, roast
>>>>>>>>potatoes,
>>>>>>>>steamed black kale (fresh from the garden) and whatever other veg
>>>>>>>>takes
>>>>>>>>my
>>>>>>>>fancy)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sounds really nice, I'm a big fan of kale and also have it in the
>>>>>>> garden. I'm overdue for roast pork with apple sauce, yum. Must do
>>>>>>> something about that.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have most of a cabbage to use up, so I'll use that today rather
>>>>>>> than
>>>>>>> kale. I might do some roast pumpkin soup while I'm at it today as
>>>>>>> well, I was going to make potato and leek but I think I'll just put
>>>>>>> the leek into the braise.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>You have reminded me I have potato and leek soup in the freezer. I
>>>>>>will
>>>>>>get
>>>>>>some out today
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope you enjoyed it. I never got around to making soup yesterday but I
>>>>> should today... another day of relentless rain so I'll be inside all
>>>>> day again. Pumpkin soup sounds good to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wouldn't be surprised if I'm flooded in at this stage. No end in
>>>>> sight until Wednesday, when *another* big low just like this one is
>>>>> due to replace this one... I might need my snorkel and flippers
>>>>
>>>>Oh dear ... lol
>>>
>>> Been out for a drive. We're flooded in now... biggest flood since 1929
>>> apparently and they say it will get worse. I've got a big mess on my
>>> hands once it dries up...
>>
>>Bad news! I am very sorry to hear that( We travelled down the farm
>>today
>>and all the rivers were very low. Not seen that in a ages!
>
> Things have settled down a bit for now, it's just breaking daylight
> here and I'll go for a walk soon. I can still hear the creek roaring
> from where I'm sitting right now, so I would say I'm still stranded in
> the immediate area. We've had something like 300mm (or 11") of rain in
> the past three days...

Oh!!! In Scotland before we left, we were getting 18c 19c for several
weeks. Here it is much hotter. Since we came yesterday it has between 22c
and 30c (( I am hoping we get some rain to cook it down a bit. I am
also hoping we get some rain at home too for my veg garden *fingers crossed*




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

In article >, says...
>
> "Jeßus" > wrote in message
> ...

> > Your sig is misconfigured, end of story.
> >
> > "I have over 30 years in IT, I worked on the very protocols used by
> > Usenet when I was ijn college" And yet you can't see that your sig
> > delimiter is wrong...
>
> It is configured to add a sig line. That is not a misconfiguration. Get
> over yourself you egomaniac jerk.
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus

He's right. Your sig separator is wrong.

On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:26:45 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
wrote:

>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
.. .
>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:27:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>> wrote:
>> I got curious about your posting history I.T matters and general
>> behaviour, and I see in comp.mobile.ipad that you got everyone offside
>> by posting questions about 'android' (without disclosing it was about
>> android - which had NOTHING to do with your issue), then got all huffy
>> about it when people started trying to help you, just like here One
>> reply sums you up nicely:
>
>
>I have never posted to that group. I don't even use Apple products at all.

That was why they were getting upset the android thing.

>This is tyhe only group I have posted to in probably 4 years now. Before
>that it was the cat group, a cigar group and occasionally the garden group.
>
>Possibly you have me mistyaken for somebody else with two commnon names?
>Naaaahhhhhhhhh Not you, impossible, right?

Either you did post there or somebody has forged your name and email
address: Paul M. Cook >

>> "We in the Apple news groups sympathize with your sentiment and wish
>> he would leave us alone as well. This guy has a long history of cross
>> posting to Linux, Apple, Android and other seemingly unrelated groups
>> with his trollish long-winded asinine posts. He often changes his nym
>> as well to avoid filters."
>> http://www.webuse.net/frameset.php?w...mp.mobile.ipad
>>
>> Oh... I hope you also got the simple port forwarding issue figured out
>> too, Mr '30 years'
>>
>> ... and your real email addy is on a ton of spam lists too.
>> Anyway, why not just take on board that the sig in your newsreader is
>> misconfigured. Not the crime of the century and not your fault, as I
>> have discovered through some research. It's Avast's fault, rather
>> sleazy of them to do so too, as it would have to be intentional.
>> The simple solution is to disable the sig, but I understand you're too
>> immature to be sensible about it.
>
>
>Nice try, moron. But that was not me. My fully qualified personal email
>address is in every post I make.

Yes... and your 'fully qualified personal email' IS
THERE FOR ALL TO SEE. I even provided the link for you.

Go troll somewhere else.

"Jeßus" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 17:26:45 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
> wrote:
>
>>"Jeßus" > wrote in message
. ..
>>> On Tue, 7 Jun 2016 12:27:06 -0700, "Paul M. Cook" >
>>> wrote:
>>> I got curious about your posting history I.T matters and general
>>> behaviour, and I see in comp.mobile.ipad that you got everyone offside
>>> by posting questions about 'android' (without disclosing it was about
>>> android - which had NOTHING to do with your issue), then got all huffy
>>> about it when people started trying to help you, just like here One
>>> reply sums you up nicely:
>>
>>
>>I have never posted to that group. I don't even use Apple products at
>>all.
>
> That was why they were getting upset the android thing.
>
>>This is tyhe only group I have posted to in probably 4 years now. Before
>>that it was the cat group, a cigar group and occasionally the garden
>>group.
>>
>>Possibly you have me mistyaken for somebody else with two commnon names?
>>Naaaahhhhhhhhh Not you, impossible, right?
>
> Either you did post there or somebody has forged your name and email
> address: Paul M. Cook >
>

Again, I do not even use Apple products. I don't have an iPad or an iPhone
and I have no need for tech support as I do that for a living. I sell tech
support.

>>> "We in the Apple news groups sympathize with your sentiment and wish
>>> he would leave us alone as well. This guy has a long history of cross
>>> posting to Linux, Apple, Android and other seemingly unrelated groups
>>> with his trollish long-winded asinine posts. He often changes his nym
>>> as well to avoid filters."
>>> http://www.webuse.net/frameset.php?w...mp.mobile.ipad
>>>
>>> Oh... I hope you also got the simple port forwarding issue figured out
>>> too, Mr '30 years'
>>>
>>> ... and your real email addy is on a ton of spam lists too.
>>> Anyway, why not just take on board that the sig in your newsreader is
>>> misconfigured. Not the crime of the century and not your fault, as I
>>> have discovered through some research. It's Avast's fault, rather
>>> sleazy of them to do so too, as it would have to be intentional.
>>> The simple solution is to disable the sig, but I understand you're too
>>> immature to be sensible about it.
>>
>>
>>Nice try, moron. But that was not me. My fully qualified personal email
>>address is in every post I make.
>
> Yes... and your 'fully qualified personal email' IS
> THERE FOR ALL TO SEE. I even provided the link for you.

Beats me. Tell ya what Columbo, have a look at the headers. You'll find
either the the message orignated from or the ISPs domain. Then compare it
to one on this thread and you'll see they do not match at all. DO an rDNS
lookup on the IP and tell me what part of the country it originated in.
Hint: I live in SoCal.

I'm not some desperate troll like you and squishie or any of the other names
you boobs have been using to flood this group recently. You two and that
bozo Greg Morrow.

Loser.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

On 6/7/2016 9:12 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:

>> No. Their wisdom is to misconfigure it so that you become their tool by
>> advertising for them every time you post. That fact I do not question.
>
> Well I use it for free so I suppose its the least I can do. It's a good
> product.
>

Various ways to look at it:
I'm thrifty and trade the free advertising for a product
I'm too cheap to pay so I can get rid of the advertisement
I feel I should plug their product in exchange for the use of it

My favorite:
I know a few people are annoyed by it so I'm not going to eliminate it.

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 6/7/2016 9:12 PM, Paul M. Cook wrote:
>
>>> No. Their wisdom is to misconfigure it so that you become their tool by
>>> advertising for them every time you post. That fact I do not question.
>>
>> Well I use it for free so I suppose its the least I can do. It's a good
>> product.
>>
>
> Various ways to look at it:
> I'm thrifty and trade the free advertising for a product
> I'm too cheap to pay so I can get rid of the advertisement
> I feel I should plug their product in exchange for the use of it
>
> My favorite:
> I know a few people are annoyed by it so I'm not going to eliminate it.

Yes, well that is a possibility. I still use OE for possibly that same
reason.



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

Paul M. Cook formulated:
> I have over 30 days in IT, Trust me, I can't turn
> off a sig even if I want to.
> ---
> This poster is too stoopid to turn of this spam sig.
> https://www.SPAM.com/SPAM
>

Dimwit.

In article >, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
>
>Well I use it for free so I suppose its the least I can do. It's a good
>product.
>
>---
>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
Not that good. I received 3 emails today with that line that all had
infected attachments. A really free antivirus software (clamav) on my
server detected and quarantined them. And clamav doesn't advertise. Even
when it scans OUTGOING email on my server. It just quietly does its
job--and does it quite well.

-ray

On Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:27:52 -0000 (UTC), Ray Abbitt
> wrote:

>In article >, Paul M. Cook > wrote:
>>
>>Well I use it for free so I suppose its the least I can do. It's a good
>>product.
>>
>>---
>>This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>https://www.spam.com/spam
>>
>Not that good. I received 3 emails today with that line that all had
>infected attachments. A really free antivirus software (clamav) on my
>server detected and quarantined them. And clamav doesn't advertise. Even
>when it scans OUTGOING email on my server. It just quietly does its
>job--and does it quite well.


Precisely. I've used Clamwin on this machine for around 5 years now
with no issues whatsoever and no other bullshit to put up with just
because it's free either.

Note the intentionally incorrect sig delimiter that Avast uses, to
circumvent email and news clients automatically removing the sig from
any replies. Now that's a class act... who would trust an AV when they
do that??