So, what's all the hub-bub about?

Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
and pour it on?

Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?

nb

notbob wrote:
>
> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> and pour it on?
>
> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?

It's just the latest nifty food. The combo is a crash, imo.

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> notbob wrote:
>>
>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>
>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>> and pour it on?
>>
>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>
> It's just the latest nifty food. The combo is a crash, imo.

Except there's really nothing new about it, been around for quite awhile.

Cheri

On 18 Jun 2016 19:16:07 GMT, notbob > wrote:

>So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
>Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>and pour it on?
>
>Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>
>nb

I didn't catch the recipe for it, but last night Triple D had chicken
and waffles. The interesting part was that when the seasoning/flour
mixture was made up for the chicken, the remaining seasoned flour was
used for making the waffle batter. So, a savory waffle. Now that I
could imagine eating. The sauce/syrup was tending toward savory as
well. The syrup was the base but was mixed with herbs etc. so that it
wasn't what I would call sweet.
Maybe something you could tinker with.
Janet US

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
<
> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> and pour it on?
>
> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>
> nb
>
>
I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
on top.

Within the last week the Pioneer Woman (Ree Drummond)
prepared chicken and waffles with some sort of sweet syrup.
I didn't watch the whole episode as what I saw produced
a lurching stomach.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>
>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>> and pour it on?
>>
>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>>
>I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
>at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
>menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
>they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
>on top.

Oh no... that sounds so wrong :/

>Within the last week the Pioneer Woman (Ree Drummond)
>prepared chicken and waffles with some sort of sweet syrup.
>I didn't watch the whole episode as what I saw produced
>a lurching stomach.

It sure doesnt sound very appealing.

On 2016-06-18 4:49 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT), "
> > wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>>
>>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>>> and pour it on?
>>>
>>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>>>
>> I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
>> at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
>> menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
>> they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
>> on top.
>
> Oh no... that sounds so wrong :/
>
>> Within the last week the Pioneer Woman (Ree Drummond)
>> prepared chicken and waffles with some sort of sweet syrup.
>> I didn't watch the whole episode as what I saw produced
>> a lurching stomach.
>
> It sure doesnt sound very appealing.

I agree. Last year my son was heading up to Montreal and planned to do
it through the US and to stop at a place that was renowned for its
fried chicken and waffles. I dared to suggest that it sounded like a
bad idea and he exercised his right to disagree. When he got back he
told me he wished he had listened to me. They were a real disappointment.

On 6/18/2016 11:20 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-06-18 4:49 PM, Je�us wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>>>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>>>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>>>> and pour it on?
>>>>
>>>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>>>>
>>> I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
>>> at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
>>> menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
>>> they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
>>> on top.
>>
>> Oh no... that sounds so wrong :/
>>
>>> Within the last week the Pioneer Woman (Ree Drummond)
>>> prepared chicken and waffles with some sort of sweet syrup.
>>> I didn't watch the whole episode as what I saw produced
>>> a lurching stomach.
>>
>> It sure doesnt sound very appealing.
>
> I agree. Last year my son was heading up to Montreal and planned to do
> it through the US and to stop at a place that was renowned for its
> fried chicken and waffles. I dared to suggest that it sounded like a
> bad idea and he exercised his right to disagree. When he got back he
> told me he wished he had listened to me. They were a real disappointment.
>

I had a corn muffin and some Powerade for breakfast. No coffee yet. I
would kill for some chicken and waffles. Put them on separate plates, if
you don't mind.

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:20:00 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-06-18 4:49 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT), "
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>>>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>>>
>>>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>>>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>>>> and pour it on?
>>>>
>>>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>>>>
>>> I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
>>> at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
>>> menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
>>> they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
>>> on top.
>>
>> Oh no... that sounds so wrong :/
>>
>>> Within the last week the Pioneer Woman (Ree Drummond)
>>> prepared chicken and waffles with some sort of sweet syrup.
>>> I didn't watch the whole episode as what I saw produced
>>> a lurching stomach.
>>
>> It sure doesnt sound very appealing.
>
>I agree. Last year my son was heading up to Montreal and planned to do
>it through the US and to stop at a place that was renowned for its
>fried chicken and waffles. I dared to suggest that it sounded like a
>bad idea and he exercised his right to disagree. When he got back he
>told me he wished he had listened to me. They were a real disappointment.

I'm not a fan of waffles to begin with, so...
And then to add sweeteners to it when there is also chicken?
Pass.

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 4:36:08 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>
> I'm not a fan of waffles to begin with, so...
> And then to add sweeteners to it when there is also chicken?
> Pass.
>
>
I love waffles and make sure they are drowned in
syrup please. I'll be eating it as a breakfast
food, hold the chicken, that will be lunch.

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 12:16:11 PM UTC-7, notbob wrote:
> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> and pour it on?
>
> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>
> nb

chicken and waffles has been around for years in the south. I guess it could be an acquired taste for those of us who didn't grow up with it.

On 2016-06-18, ImStillMags > wrote:

> chicken and waffles has been around for years in the south.

Define "years".

I lived jes outside Nashviller fer 2 yrs ('68-'69). Never even heard
of chicken n' waffles and NEVER saw that combo on any menu. Dated a
native Alabaman fer 4 yrs. Still never heard of 'em.

In fact, I've only heard of 'em, recently, in the last couple of
years. Seem to be all the rage .....somewhere. Heck, I've never even
seen that combo on a truck stop menu. Fer awhile, I thought it was a
joke. They must be hiding the damn things, cuz I've never seen 'em,
at all, 'cept'n on TV. 8|

nb

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 15:56:10 -0700 (PDT), "
> wrote:

>On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 4:36:08 PM UTC-5, Jeßus wrote:
>>
>> I'm not a fan of waffles to begin with, so...
>> And then to add sweeteners to it when there is also chicken?
>> Pass.
>>
>>
>I love waffles and make sure they are drowned in
>syrup please. I'll be eating it as a breakfast
>food, hold the chicken, that will be lunch.

Two meals for the price of one

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 6:28:01 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>
> On 2016-06-18, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > chicken and waffles has been around for years in the south.
>
> Define "years".
>
> nb
>
>
I'm in the mid-South and had never heard of it
until my trip to Pennsylvania almost 16 years ago.

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> and pour it on?
>
> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>
> nb

From what I have seen both syrup and gravy. Does not appeal to me.

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 7:11:43 PM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> From what I have seen both syrup and gravy. Does not appeal to me.
>
>
Syrup on chicken and gravy on waffles both sound
revolting to me.

On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 4:28:01 PM UTC-7, notbob wrote:
> On 2016-06-18, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > chicken and waffles has been around for years in the south.
>
> Define "years".
>
> I lived jes outside Nashviller fer 2 yrs ('68-'69). Never even heard
> of chicken n' waffles and NEVER saw that combo on any menu. Dated a
> native Alabaman fer 4 yrs. Still never heard of 'em.
>
> In fact, I've only heard of 'em, recently, in the last couple of
> years. Seem to be all the rage .....somewhere. Heck, I've never even
> seen that combo on a truck stop menu. Fer awhile, I thought it was a
> joke. They must be hiding the damn things, cuz I've never seen 'em,
> at all, 'cept'n on TV. 8|
>
> nb

Wiki gives a pretty good history.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles

On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:

> Wiki gives a pretty good history.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles

Good read, as usual.

Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?

I know I certainly cannot. 8|

nb

On 2016-06-18 8:51 PM, notbob wrote:
> On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
>> Wiki gives a pretty good history.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles
>
> Good read, as usual.
>
> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>
> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>


Nor can I.

tsjoannotjoann wrote:
>Dave Smith wrote:
>>notbob wrote:
>> >
>> > Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
>> > 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>> >
>> > I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>>
>> Nor can I.
>>
>Me neither.

I would never order waffles, I despise waffles as much as I despise
pancakes... if I'm gonna eat filler food it's going to be real bread,
not some sort of cooked batter

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 21:02:00 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:

> On 2016-06-18 8:51 PM, notbob wrote:
>> On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:
>>
>>> Wiki gives a pretty good history.
>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles
>>
>> Good read, as usual.
>>
>> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
>> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>>
>> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>>
>
> Nor can I.

While you're not exactly in the soul food capital of the U.S. (or even
in the U.S.) you have "Staxx Chicken and Waffles" in Hamilton which is
close enough; certainly closer than Notbob who has to drive to find
any minor restaurant mecca (where I'm sire he can find c&w too). I'm
sure there are more restaurants even closer if one could search all
the local menus and not just restaurant names.

"l not -l" > wrote in message
...
>
> On 18-Jun-2016, " >
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 6:28:01 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>> >
>> > On 2016-06-18, ImStillMags > wrote:
>> >
>> > > chicken and waffles has been around for years in the south.
>> >
>> > Define "years".
>> >
>> > nb
>> >
>> >
>> I'm in the mid-South and had never heard of it
>> until my trip to Pennsylvania almost 16 years ago.
> I grew up in western Kentucky and never heard of such a thing until recent
> years; only after Food Network came along. Also spent a lot of time in
> Charlotte NC and never saw it on any menus there.
> Wikipedia suggests it popularized in Harlem, then migrated to LA when a
> former Harlem resident opened a restaurant there.

There was a chicken and waffle place in Oakland when we lived in that area.
So... Like... 14 years ago or longer. I had heard of them prior when my MIL
offered me some. I had wrongly assumed that it would be chicken in gravy.
That didn't sound good either so, nope.

"notbob" > wrote in message
...
> On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
>> Wiki gives a pretty good history.
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles
>
> Good read, as usual.
>
> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>
> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>
> nb

But... I did get get this combo in frozen meals. Angela was saying how she'd
like to eat it but she didn't want the bones. Fred Meyer had them on sale
with no bones. I bought two.

"Ned Ryerson" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 21:02:00 -0400, Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> On 2016-06-18 8:51 PM, notbob wrote:
>>> On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Wiki gives a pretty good history.
>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles
>>>
>>> Good read, as usual.
>>>
>>> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
>>> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>>>
>>> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>>>
>>
>> Nor can I.
>
> While you're not exactly in the soul food capital of the U.S. (or even
> in the U.S.) you have "Staxx Chicken and Waffles" in Hamilton which is
> close enough; certainly closer than Notbob who has to drive to find
> any minor restaurant mecca (where I'm sire he can find c&w too). I'm
> sure there are more restaurants even closer if one could search all
> the local menus and not just restaurant names.

Granted, these places are in Seattle but close enough I guess, if you want
this.

https://www.yelp.com/search?find_des...eat tle%2C+WA

"Sqwertz" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:32:38 -0700 (PDT),
> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 2:16:11 PM UTC-5, notbob wrote:
>> <
>>> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>>>
>>> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>>> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>>> and pour it on?
>>>
>>> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>>>
>>> nb
>>>
>>>
>> I don't get the appeal either. About 15 years ago I was
>> at a friends house in Pennsylvania and that was on the
>> menu one night. Verrrrry unimpressive especially when
>> they brought out the powdered sugar to sprinkle a dab
>> on top.
>
> It's important to distinguish between which of the two very different
> "Chicken and Waffles" dishes you're referring to. If powdered sugar
> was offered then this would presumably be the southern/soul kind. The
> sugar (syrup and butter) is for the waffle, not the chicken.

I've seen them served on TV with chicken on the bone, set on top of the
waffle and both drizzled with syrup and gravy.

On 18 Jun 2016 19:16:07 GMT, notbob > wrote:

> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>
> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> and pour it on?
>
> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>

Latest? Have you been living under a rock?

--

sf

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:40:16 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
> "Gary" > wrote in message ...
> > notbob wrote:
> >>
> >> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
> >>
> >> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> >> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> >> and pour it on?
> >>
> >> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
> >
> > It's just the latest nifty food. The combo is a crash, imo.
>
> Except there's really nothing new about it, been around for quite awhile.
>
I love chicken & waffles... and all the variations. That's the
closest I'll ever get to breakfast for dinner.

--

sf

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 13:59:47 -0600, Janet B >
wrote:

> On 18 Jun 2016 19:16:07 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>
> >So, what's all the hub-bub about?
> >
> >Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
> >D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
> >and pour it on?
> >
> >Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
> >
> >nb
>
> I didn't catch the recipe for it, but last night Triple D had chicken
> and waffles. The interesting part was that when the seasoning/flour
> mixture was made up for the chicken, the remaining seasoned flour was
> used for making the waffle batter. So, a savory waffle. Now that I
> could imagine eating. The sauce/syrup was tending toward savory as
> well. The syrup was the base but was mixed with herbs etc. so that it
> wasn't what I would call sweet.
> Maybe something you could tinker with.
> Janet US

I love cornmeal waffles with it.

--

sf

On 19 Jun 2016 00:51:06 GMT, notbob > wrote:

> On 2016-06-19, ImStillMags > wrote:
>
> > Wiki gives a pretty good history.
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicken_and_waffles
>
> Good read, as usual.
>
> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>
> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>

I can - in more than one restaurant.

--

sf

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 12:40:16 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Gary" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > notbob wrote:
>> >>
>> >> So, what's all the hub-bub about?
>> >>
>> >> Personally, I can't even imagine the attraction of this combination.
>> >> D'ya pour the syrup over the chicken, too? Wrap a thigh ina waffle
>> >> and pour it on?
>> >>
>> >> Or is it jes the latest media created buzz?
>> >
>> > It's just the latest nifty food. The combo is a crash, imo.
>>
>> Except there's really nothing new about it, been around for quite awhile.
>>
> I love chicken & waffles... and all the variations. That's the
> closest I'll ever get to breakfast for dinner.
>
> --
>
> sf

Nothing not to love IMO.

Cheri

On Sunday, June 19, 2016 at 12:20:31 AM UTC-5, Julie Bove wrote:
>
> "Sqwertz" > wrote in message
> >
> > It's important to distinguish between which of the two very different
> > "Chicken and Waffles" dishes you're referring to. If powdered sugar
> > was offered then this would presumably be the southern/soul kind. The
> > sugar (syrup and butter) is for the waffle, not the chicken.
>
> I've seen them served on TV with chicken on the bone, set on top of the
> waffle and both drizzled with syrup and gravy.
>
>
I don't know about any "southern/soul kind" since I've never
seen or heard of a restaurant around here serving this con-
coction. But what I've seen on TV was set on top of the
waffle and drizzled with syrup. Haven't seen the gravy
version but both just kill my appetite.

On 6/19/2016 1:41 AM, Sqwertz wrote:

> Granted, it's just relatively recently (10-15 years) becoming trendy.
> Ever since they've been unjustly popularized by FoodTV and other media
> :-)

To me, chicken and waffles sounds like two great things ruined.

nancy

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 08:10:10 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 6/19/2016 1:41 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Granted, it's just relatively recently (10-15 years) becoming trendy.
>> Ever since they've been unjustly popularized by FoodTV and other media
>> :-)
>
>To me, chicken and waffles sounds like two great things ruined.
>
>nancy

I'm with you totally on that ! Once every five years or so, I can
enjoy a waffle with syrup etc. but not with meat. Actually I would
have the waffle for lunch, way too much for brekkie.

On 2016-06-19, Ned Ryerson > wrote:

> certainly closer than Notbob who has to drive to find
> any minor restaurant mecca (where I'm sire he can find c&w too).

Hey, be nice!

Me? I only need walk to my own kithen fer great food. I'm currently
cooking fer a couple who are building their own home, but have no
kitchen facilities, yet. They say I should open my own place. I say,
I can't wait 'til they get their kitchen built. 8|

BTW, if you meant country & western ("c&w"), yeah, we have one local
station..... but 2 classic rock stations are the most popular. Like
cooking my own food, I play my own music. Besides playing guitar, I
jes bought a banjo. Big fun!

nb

On 2016-06-19, Nancy Young > wrote:

> On 6/19/2016 1:41 AM, Sqwertz wrote:


>> Ever since they've been unjustly popularized by FoodTV and other media

The key being, "unjustly".

> To me, chicken and waffles sounds like two great things ruined.

I cannot argue.

nb

On 2016-06-18 11:13 PM, Ned Ryerson wrote:

>>> Let's re-ask the question: Who, here, can go and order waffles
>>> 'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?
>>>
>>> I know I certainly cannot. 8|
>>>
>>
>> Nor can I.
>
> While you're not exactly in the soul food capital of the U.S. (or even
> in the U.S.) you have "Staxx Chicken and Waffles" in Hamilton which is
> close enough; certainly closer than Notbob who has to drive to find
> any minor restaurant mecca (where I'm sire he can find c&w too). I'm
> sure there are more restaurants even closer if one could search all
> the local menus and not just restaurant names."


That is about an hour drive for me. The question was "Who, here, can go
and order waffles'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?"

On 2016-06-19, Dave Smith > wrote:

> That is about an hour drive for me. The question was "Who, here, can go
> and order waffles'n chicken at some restaurant, right this very instant?"

C'mon, Dave.

On 6/19/2016 8:37 AM, wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 08:10:10 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:

>> To me, chicken and waffles sounds like two great things ruined.

> I'm with you totally on that ! Once every five years or so, I can
> enjoy a waffle with syrup etc. but not with meat. Actually I would
> have the waffle for lunch, way too much for brekkie.

I just love waffles. I was just looking at them hard on a menu
yesterday morning but I really can't justify all that sugar
and calling it breakfast. Okay, sometimes I can, but it's been
a while. I go all in with the butter and syrup.

I'm not someone who freaks out if my food touches on a plate,
not at all, but I do not want my bacon touching my syrup.
Just ruins the bacon, and that's how I feel about fried chicken.

Love both of those dishes but what's the opposite of synergy,
I don't think they complement each other.

nancy

On 6/19/2016 10:11 AM, l not -l wrote:

> nom nom. 8-)

Nooo!

(laugh) Ooks me out, not matter how you spell it.

nancy

On Sun, 19 Jun 2016 08:10:10 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 6/19/2016 1:41 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Granted, it's just relatively recently (10-15 years) becoming trendy.
>> Ever since they've been unjustly popularized by FoodTV and other media
>> :-)
>
>To me, chicken and waffles sounds like two great things ruined.
>
>nancy

The only waffles I enjoy are sugar cones, with vanilla fudge and
sprinkles. I classify waffles and panckes in the same catagory as
funnel cake, awful!
I don't want any gravy on my chicken, no breading either... don't know
haw anyone can eat breaded chicken with that raw skin under the
breading.