The can of spam I have is spam lite.

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:45:43 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:37:40 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 4:06:04 PM UTC-10, Nancy2 wrote:
> > > I fixed Spam fairly often when I was a young married. With brown sugar
> > > and drained
> > > crushed pineapple on the browned slices, it was pretty tasty.
> > >
> > > N.
> >
> > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other
> > foods they consider "low class." I don't consider myself that lucky. One
> > of
> > these days these people shall be humbled for their arrogance. Well, that's
> > the way I'd like it to be anyway.
> >
> > Agreed!
> >
> > OTOH, when I was in high school me and my buddy made a glazed Spam loaf in
> > a
> > toaster oven. It was studded with cloves and glazed with an orange and
> > brown
> > sugar glaze. I had to dump it in the trash cause eating it made me feel
> > ill.
> > As they say, it seemed like a good idea at the time.
> > --------------------------------
> >
> > We have spam in our store because my
> > husband
> > likes we keep it in case of emergency. I ought to look at the dates ...
> >
> > --
> > http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>
> Spam has saved lives. More than we'll ever know.
>
> http;//www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/a-war-won-with-spam-and-a-few-other-things/
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> So I believe!
>
> --
> http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk

This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this stuff. I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that didn't like Spam musubi.

https://www.yomyomf.com/rip-to-the-i...f-spam-musubi/

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 7:45:43 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> "dsi1" wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:37:40 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>> > "dsi1" wrote in message
>> > ...
>> >
>> > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 4:06:04 PM UTC-10, Nancy2 wrote:
>> > > I fixed Spam fairly often when I was a young married. With brown
>> > > sugar
>> > > and drained
>> > > crushed pineapple on the browned slices, it was pretty tasty.
>> > >
>> > > N.
>> >
>> > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and
>> > other
>> > foods they consider "low class." I don't consider myself that lucky.
>> > One
>> > of
>> > these days these people shall be humbled for their arrogance. Well,
>> > that's
>> > the way I'd like it to be anyway.
>> >
>> > Agreed!
>> >
>> > OTOH, when I was in high school me and my buddy made a glazed Spam loaf
>> > in
>> > a
>> > toaster oven. It was studded with cloves and glazed with an orange and
>> > brown
>> > sugar glaze. I had to dump it in the trash cause eating it made me feel
>> > ill.
>> > As they say, it seemed like a good idea at the time.
>> > --------------------------------
>> >
>> > We have spam in our store because my
>> > husband
>> > likes we keep it in case of emergency. I ought to look at the dates
>> > ...
>> >
>> > --
>> > http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>>
>>
>> Spam has saved lives. More than we'll ever know.
>>
>> http;//www.defensemedianetwork.com/stories/a-war-won-with-spam-and-a-few-other-things/
>>
>> ------------------------------------
>>
>> So I believe!
>>
>> --
>> http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
>This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this
>stuff. I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that
>didn't like Spam musubi.
>
>https://www.yomyomf.com/rip-to-the-i...f-spam-musubi/
>

I will take your word for that!!!

--

http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

> wrote in message
...
> The can of spam I have is spam lite.


I don't personally care for the Spam Lite, or most of the flavored ones
either.

Cheri

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:02:29 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:

> This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this stuff. I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that didn't like Spam musubi.

I've never met a kid who's ever had Spam musubi. It's just not a
thing here.

I know I hated Spam as a child. I never liked anything where I couldn't
identify what was in it.

Cindy Hamilton1

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 8:56:42 AM UTC-10, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:02:29 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
>
> > This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this stuff. I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that didn't like Spam musubi.
>
> I've never met a kid who's ever had Spam musubi. It's just not a
> thing here.
>
> I know I hated Spam as a child. I never liked anything where I couldn't
> identify what was in it.
>
> Cindy Hamilton1

One has to get it to the kids while they're still under the age of 2 or 3 - before they get any preconceived notions about food. All I know is that most kids here would prefer a Spam musubi to a hot dog or hamburger although, they might like a chicken McNugget more.

Poi is pretty much the perfect food for infants. Adults won't care for it - unless they were raised on the stuff. Timing is always important in our food preferences.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/1...n_4353758.html

In article >,
says...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > >
> > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> >
> > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america

I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
"We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
unless I missed something.

Gary, sauté the slices on one side until browned; flip over and put the brown sugar
and pineapple on the already-browned side and sauté until browned on the bottom.

When I was in 6th grade, in Bowling Green, KY, my best friend, Molly Dodson,
had a cold Spam sandwich with mayo on Wonder Bread every single day in her
brown-bag lunch. I remember wondering how she could ever eat Spam "raw" and
cold like that. LOL.

N.

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 10:58:51 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

>The can of spam I have is spam lite.

Spam with added helium?

On 8/1/2016 11:56 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:02:29 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
>
>> This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this stuff.
>> I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that didn't like Spam musubi.
>>
> I've never met a kid who's ever had Spam musubi. It's just not a
> thing here.

Dunno where your "here" is, but it's not a thing in much of the country
and world... but very much a thing in Hawaii, and in Hawaiian-style
restaurants and diners on the West Coast of the USA.

> I know I hated Spam as a child. I never liked anything where I couldn't
> identify what was in it.

Most Americans didn't really know what to do with it. Spam musubi should
be more widespread ... it's really good. Part of the trick is a sauce,
a lot like a thick American-style sweet-and-salty "teriyaki" sauce
made with soy sauce and sugar or honey, that serves as a marinade for
sliced Spam. It helps alleviate the overwhelming saltiness that is part
and parcel of Spam's flavor. Together with the rice and the nori wrap,
it's a tasty combination. I like to think of Hawaii as America's version
of Singapo tasty hybrids of Asian cuisine.

But then again, I like most sausages, and as with Spam, you really can't
identify what's in most sausages.

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> In article >,
> dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > >
> > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> >
> > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
>
> I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> unless I missed something.

This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.

I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It was good eats!

In article >,
says...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >,
> > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > >
> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > > >
> > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> >
> > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> > unless I missed something.
>
> This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.

This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
"subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
while we discuss good food?

> I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It was good eats!

Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.

"Bruce" > wrote in message
T...
> In article >,
> says...
>>
>> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> > In article >,
>> > dsi1yahoo.com says...
>> > >
>> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam
>> > > > > and other foods they consider "low class."
>> > > >
>> > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to
>> > > > eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>> > >
>> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
>> >
>> > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
>> > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
>> > unless I missed something.
>>
>> This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the
>> few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the
>> thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
>
> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> while we discuss good food?
>
>> I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good
>> and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It
>> was good eats!
>
> Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.

Good eats is a matter of taste, and what is good eats to any given poster on
any given day is certainly dissed here on just about a daily basis.

Cheri

"Nancy2" > wrote in message
...
Gary, sauté the slices on one side until browned; flip over and put the
brown sugar
and pineapple on the already-browned side and sauté until browned on the
bottom.

When I was in 6th grade, in Bowling Green, KY, my best friend, Molly Dodson,
had a cold Spam sandwich with mayo on Wonder Bread every single day in her
brown-bag lunch. I remember wondering how she could ever eat Spam "raw" and
cold like that. LOL.

N.

======

The same way one would eat salami "raw" or bologna "raw" and cold like that.

Cheri

wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam
> > and other foods they consider "low class."
> >
> >
> I don't consider it low class, it's just too fatty for me.
> Perhaps once a year I might eat it but much more than that I
> feel queasy. Even after frying to get as much grease out as
> possible I will feel nauseous if I eat much of it. Chomping
> down on a piece of gristle doesn't improve my liking of it
> either.

I like spam in reasonable amounts. A standard can seems a 6 person meal
(or 4 with leftovers)


--

Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> "dsi1" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > >
> >> People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam
> and >> other foods they consider "low class."
> >
> > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to
> > eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> But I though food banks were everywhere in US???

Drop offs are. Pickups are not. My area of 1.7M people has 1. It's a
7$ toll ride each way from me so 14$ to get there and back.

--

Ophelia wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> Ophelia wrote:
> >
> > > "dsi1" wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >
> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >>> > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing
> Spam and >>> > other foods they consider "low class."
> > > >
> >>> Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to
> eat > bad >>> stuff, just to stay alive?
> > >
> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > But I though food banks were everywhere in US???
> >
> >
> > They are, Ms. O...here are several that we send clients to:
> >
> > http://www.lakeviewpantry.org/about-us-2.html
> >
> > http://careforreal.org/services-programs/food-clothing/
> >
> > Many smaller local social service/help agencies/churches/community
> > centers maintain smaller food pantries, these may serve specific
> > groups, e.g. refugees, homeless, low - income seniors, women with
> > infants/children, etc.
> >
> > Food "banks" are huge organisations, here is the big Chicago one:
> >
> > http://www.chicagosfoodbank.org/site/PageServer
> >
> > Chicago Food Depository is a conduit for food to smaller
> > organisations...
>
>
> Thanks, yes. I always believed it was well covered.

It's not. It's definately not in Hampton Roads.



--

Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 5:20:05 AM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 7:18:29 PM UTC-10,
> > > wrote:
> > >
> >
> >>> Chomping down on a piece of gristle doesn't improve my liking of
> it >>> either.
> > >
> > > As far as any gristle goes, I've never seen that in Spam, since
> > > the meat is totally mashed into a fine, uniform, paste that
> > > bears absolutely no resemblance to meat at all. You may be
> > > mixing Spam up with luncheon meat.
> > >
> > >
> > No, no, no. It is indeed Spam. I've never had a can of it that
> > there wasn't a chunk of gristle in it.
>
> I've never had a can that does have a chunk of gristle in it, and I
> buy Spam often.
>
> Cheri

SAme here, never found gristle in any of them.

--

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> In article >,
> dsyahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > > > >
> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> > > >
> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> > >
> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> > > unless I missed something.
> >
> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
>
> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> while we discuss good food?

Don't believe me, just ask Google

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking

>
> > I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It was good eats!
>
> Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.

I don't dis foods. I have an almost religious reverence for food. Remember saying grace? People gave thanks for the foods they ate because the food supply was not all that reliable and taking food for granted would be blasphemy. These days, most folks don't seem to give a shit because they've had a pampered life. They can afford to make fun of hungry people. So you go ahead and wave at them! Fun!

On 8/1/2016 2:56 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 2:02:29 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
>
>> This woman might be a candidate for sainthood. My kids were raised on this stuff. I see a world where all kids are eating this. I never met a kid that didn't like Spam musubi.
>
> I've never met a kid who's ever had Spam musubi. It's just not a
> thing here.
>
Yep, we don't all live in Hawaii.

> I know I hated Spam as a child. I never liked anything where I couldn't
> identify what was in it.
>
> Cindy Hamilton1
>
I didn't grow up eating Spam so no idea whether or not I'd have liked it
as a child. I do have a couple of cans of Spam in the pantry.
Allegedly this is for when my house gets blown away by a hurricane.
Apparently Spam can survive anything.

Jill

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> In article >,
>> dsyahoo.com says...
>> >
>> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> > > In article >,
>> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
>> > > >
>> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>> > > >
>> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
>> > >
>> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
>> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
>> > > unless I missed something.
>> >
>> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
>>
>> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
>> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
>> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
>> while we discuss good food?
>
>Don't believe me, just ask Google
>
>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking

6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
Usenet.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >,
> > dsyahoo.com says...
> > >
> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> > > >
> > > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> > > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> > > > unless I missed something.
> > >
> > > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> >
> > This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> > Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> > "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> > while we discuss good food?
>
> Don't believe me, just ask Google
>
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking

Just as I thought: crazy Google Groups speak.

> > > I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until
I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck
in it. It was good eats!
> >
> > Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.
>
> I don't dis foods. I have an almost religious reverence for food.
> Remember saying grace? People gave thanks for the foods they ate
> because the food supply was not all that reliable and taking food for
> granted would be blasphemy. These days, most folks don't seem to give
> a shit because they've had a pampered life. They can afford to make
> fun of hungry people. So you go ahead and wave at them! Fun!

You're just flirting with poor people without being poor yourself.
Everybody in rfc can afford at least basic decent food.

In article >, says...
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> T...
> > In article >,
> > says...
> >>
> >> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > In article >,
> >> > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >> > >
> >> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam
> >> > > > > and other foods they consider "low class."
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to
> >> > > > eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> >> > >
> >> > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> >> >
> >> > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> >> > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> >> > unless I missed something.
> >>
> >> This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the
> >> few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the
> >> thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> >
> > This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> > Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> > "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> > while we discuss good food?
> >
> >> I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until I'm good
> >> and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck in it. It
> >> was good eats!
> >
> > Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.
>
> Good eats is a matter of taste, and what is good eats to any given poster on
> any given day is certainly dissed here on just about a daily basis.

Yes, but that's another topic. dsi1 says that you can't call any food
bad because there are people who are hungry. But everybody considers
certain foods bad, even though we'd still eat them if we had no choice.

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:29:36 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi10yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> In article >,
> >> dsyahoo.com says...
> >> >
> >> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > > In article >,
> >> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> >> > > >
> >> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> >> > >
> >> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> >> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> >> > > unless I missed something.
> >> >
> >> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> >>
> >> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> >> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> >> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> >> while we discuss good food?
> >
> >Don't believe me, just ask Google
> >
> >https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
>
> 6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
> Usenet.

It says on the page that this is a public Usenet newsgroup. It doesn't claim it as a Google Group forum. OTOH, GG will not retain/display posts from posters of an unseemly nature so I guess that's a step in the right direction.

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:46:02 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> In article >,
> dsiyahoo.com says...
> >
> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > dsyahoo.com says...
> > > >
> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > In article >,
> > > > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> > > > >
> > > > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> > > > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> > > > > unless I missed something.
> > > >
> > > > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> > >
> > > This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> > > Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> > > "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> > > while we discuss good food?
> >
> > Don't believe me, just ask Google
> >
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
>
> Just as I thought: crazy Google Groups speak.
>
> > > > I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until
> I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck
> in it. It was good eats!
> > >
> > > Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.
> >
> > I don't dis foods. I have an almost religious reverence for food.
> > Remember saying grace? People gave thanks for the foods they ate
> > because the food supply was not all that reliable and taking food for
> > granted would be blasphemy. These days, most folks don't seem to give
> > a shit because they've had a pampered life. They can afford to make
> > fun of hungry people. So you go ahead and wave at them! Fun!
>
> You're just flirting with poor people without being poor yourself.
> Everybody in rfc can afford at least basic decent food.

I will disagree with that statement. Let's leave it at that.

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:29:36 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi10yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> In article >,
>> >> dsyahoo.com says...
>> >> >
>> >> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> > > In article >,
>> >> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> >> > > > > >
>> >> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
>> >> > >
>> >> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
>> >> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
>> >> > > unless I missed something.
>> >> >
>> >> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
>> >>
>> >> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
>> >> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
>> >> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
>> >> while we discuss good food?
>> >
>> >Don't believe me, just ask Google
>> >
>> >https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
>>
>> 6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
>> Usenet.
>
>It says on the page that this is a public Usenet newsgroup. It doesn't claim it as a Google Group forum.

That must be why they call it 'google groups' and not 'Usenet' so
frequently. Do you seriously think google knows how many people are
'subscribed' to particular newsgroups across all of Usenet? Quite an
(impossible) technical feat if they have managed to do that. Not
mention the privacy issues. All they know is how many GGers have
subscribed.

>OTOH, GG will not retain/display posts from posters of an unseemly nature so I guess that's a step in the right direction.

Haha, yeah, sure. They would *never* harbour serial spammers or trolls
now, would they? LOL. And by definition that claim of yours proves GG
isn't compliant with accepted Usenet standards.

Cheri wrote:
>
>When I was in 6th grade, in Bowling Green, KY, my best friend, Molly Dodson,
>had a cold Spam sandwich with mayo on Wonder Bread every single day in her
>brown-bag lunch. I remember wondering how she could ever eat Spam "raw" and
>cold like that. LOL.

I eat SPAM cold directly from the can but with mustard, never mayo.
Don't knock your friend Molly, she likely grew up enjoying her pink
meat with a creamy lusty swallow. hehe

In article >,
says...
>
> On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:46:02 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >,
> > dsiyahoo.com says...
> > >
> > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > In article >,
> > > > dsyahoo.com says...
> > > > >
> > > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > > In article >,
> > > > > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> > > > > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> > > > > > unless I missed something.
> > > > >
> > > > > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> > > >
> > > > This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> > > > Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> > > > "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> > > > while we discuss good food?
> > >
> > > Don't believe me, just ask Google
> > >
> > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
> >
> > Just as I thought: crazy Google Groups speak.
> >
> > > > > I can only speak for myself. Most of the time, I don't eat until
> > I'm good and hungry. The other day I had cup noodle with a hot dog stuck
> > in it. It was good eats!
> > > >
> > > > Nobody's expecting you to diss good eats.
> > >
> > > I don't dis foods. I have an almost religious reverence for food.
> > > Remember saying grace? People gave thanks for the foods they ate
> > > because the food supply was not all that reliable and taking food for
> > > granted would be blasphemy. These days, most folks don't seem to give
> > > a shit because they've had a pampered life. They can afford to make
> > > fun of hungry people. So you go ahead and wave at them! Fun!
> >
> > You're just flirting with poor people without being poor yourself.
> > Everybody in rfc can afford at least basic decent food.
>
> I will disagree with that statement. Let's leave it at that.

Anybody who can't afford basic decent food, report to dsi1! He might
send you a can of spam!

In article >, says...
>
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:29:36 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi10yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Don't believe me, just ask Google
> >> >
> >> >https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
> >>
> >> 6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
> >> Usenet.
> >
> >It says on the page that this is a public Usenet newsgroup. It doesn't claim it as a Google Group forum.
>
> That must be why they call it 'google groups' and not 'Usenet' so
> frequently. Do you seriously think google knows how many people are
> 'subscribed' to particular newsgroups across all of Usenet? Quite an
> (impossible) technical feat if they have managed to do that. Not
> mention the privacy issues. All they know is how many GGers have
> subscribed.
>
> >OTOH, GG will not retain/display posts from posters of an unseemly nature so I guess that's a step in the right direction.
>
> Haha, yeah, sure. They would *never* harbour serial spammers or trolls
> now, would they? LOL. And by definition that claim of yours proves GG
> isn't compliant with accepted Usenet standards.

How can you criticize Google Groups? If you were poor and living under a
bridge, you'd be very happy to have Google Groups on your mobile!

On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 4:14:42 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi1yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:29:36 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
> >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi10yahoo.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> >> In article >,
> >> >> dsyahoo.com says...
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> >> > > In article >,
> >> >> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
> >> >> > > > > >
> >> >> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
> >> >> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
> >> >> > > unless I missed something.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
> >> >>
> >> >> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
> >> >> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
> >> >> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
> >> >> while we discuss good food?
> >> >
> >> >Don't believe me, just ask Google
> >> >
> >> >https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
> >>
> >> 6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
> >> Usenet.
> >
> >It says on the page that this is a public Usenet newsgroup. It doesn't claim it as a Google Group forum.
>
> That must be why they call it 'google groups' and not 'Usenet' so
> frequently. Do you seriously think google knows how many people are
> 'subscribed' to particular newsgroups across all of Usenet? Quite an
> (impossible) technical feat if they have managed to do that. Not
> mention the privacy issues. All they know is how many GGers have
> subscribed.
>
> >OTOH, GG will not retain/display posts from posters of an unseemly nature so I guess that's a step in the right direction.
>
> Haha, yeah, sure. They would *never* harbour serial spammers or trolls
> now, would they? LOL. And by definition that claim of yours proves GG
> isn't compliant with accepted Usenet standards.

I post from Google Groups and to Usenet using a NNTP program - don't think for a second that I don't know the difference between the two. You're the one that seems confused and all grumpy because things ain't going as you'd like it to.

Google Groups ain't 100% compliant with the Usenet standards - so what? When was the last time it was revised? 10 years ago? The reason it's just laying there stagnant is because nobody gives a shit about NNTP. What internet protocol that's relevant to the modern world has remained unchanged for a decade? Beats the hell out of me. Google has done a pretty good job with compatibility with NNTP but don't expect miracles. You can choose to live like it's 1999, that's your privilege. Just don't make the mistake in thinking that I give a hoot about you or your little problems.

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:37:41 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 >
wrote:

>On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 4:14:42 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:52:45 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi1yahoo.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 3:29:36 PM UTC-10, Jeßus wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 18:17:20 -0700 (PDT), dsi1 <dsi10yahoo.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 1:05:13 PM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> >> In article >,
>> >> >> dsyahoo.com says...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 10:09:34 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> >> > > In article >,
>> >> >> > > dsi1yahoo.com says...
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > On Monday, August 1, 2016 at 12:26:45 AM UTC-10, Bruce wrote:
>> >> >> > > > > > On Sunday, July 31, 2016 at 9:55:52 PM UTC-5, dsi1 wrote:
>> >> >> > > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > > People with an abundance of food have the luxury of dissing Spam and other foods they consider "low class."
>> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> > > > > Don't we all have an abundance of food? Is anybody here forced to eat bad stuff, just to stay alive?
>> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> > > > http://www.google.com/search?q=hunger+in+america
>> >> >> > >
>> >> >> > > I know there is poverty in the world, but my "we" was referring to rfc.
>> >> >> > > "We" can diss bad food because "we" all have an abundance of food,
>> >> >> > > unless I missed something.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > This newsgroup has 6,200 subscribers. I will not talk on behalf of the few people that post here nor will I make presumptions about the thousands that don't post. You ask a question that is unanswerable.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This newsgroup has 6,2000 subscribers??? Is this some kind of Google
>> >> >> Groups speak? And you're saying that these poor and nearly starving
>> >> >> "subscribers" are lurking in rfc? Shouldn't we occasionally wave at them
>> >> >> while we discuss good food?
>> >> >
>> >> >Don't believe me, just ask Google
>> >> >
>> >> >https://groups.google.com/forum/#!ab...c.food.cooking
>> >>
>> >> 6210 'google groups' subscribers. Google doesnt speak for the whole of
>> >> Usenet.
>> >
>> >It says on the page that this is a public Usenet newsgroup. It doesn't claim it as a Google Group forum.
>>
>> That must be why they call it 'google groups' and not 'Usenet' so
>> frequently. Do you seriously think google knows how many people are
>> 'subscribed' to particular newsgroups across all of Usenet? Quite an
>> (impossible) technical feat if they have managed to do that. Not
>> mention the privacy issues. All they know is how many GGers have
>> subscribed.
>>
>> >OTOH, GG will not retain/display posts from posters of an unseemly nature so I guess that's a step in the right direction.
>>
>> Haha, yeah, sure. They would *never* harbour serial spammers or trolls
>> now, would they? LOL. And by definition that claim of yours proves GG
>> isn't compliant with accepted Usenet standards.
>
>I post from Google Groups and to Usenet using a NNTP program - don't think for a second that I don't know the difference between the two. You're the one that seems confused and all grumpy because things ain't going as you'd like it to.
>
>Google Groups ain't 100% compliant with the Usenet standards - so what? When was the last time it was revised? 10 years ago? The reason it's just laying there stagnant is because nobody gives a shit about NNTP. What internet protocol that's relevant to the modern world has remained unchanged for a decade? Beats the hell out of me. Google has done a pretty good job with compatibility with NNTP but don't expect miracles. You can choose to live like it's 1999, that's your privilege. Just don't make the mistake in thinking that I give a hoot about you or your little problems.


It didn't work. Try again.

"Bruce" > wrote in message
T...
> In article >, says...

>> Good eats is a matter of taste, and what is good eats to any given poster
>> on
>> any given day is certainly dissed here on just about a daily basis.
>
> Yes, but that's another topic. dsi1 says that you can't call any food
> bad because there are people who are hungry. But everybody considers
> certain foods bad, even though we'd still eat them if we had no choice.

That's true, people who say they wouldn't eat this or that even if they were
starving, have never been starving.

Cheri

"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
...
> Cheri wrote:
>>
>>When I was in 6th grade, in Bowling Green, KY, my best friend, Molly
>>Dodson,
>>had a cold Spam sandwich with mayo on Wonder Bread every single day in her
>>brown-bag lunch. I remember wondering how she could ever eat Spam "raw"
>>and
>>cold like that. LOL.
>
> I eat SPAM cold directly from the can but with mustard, never mayo.
> Don't knock your friend Molly, she likely grew up enjoying her pink
> meat with a creamy lusty swallow. hehe

I did not write that post, I have had many cold Spam sandwiches, though I do
prefer Spam cooked in various ways.

Cheri

Cheri, my point was I had never had Spam except as hot and sautéed.
My family didn't have it very often....

N.

Nancy2 wrote:
>
> Cheri, my point was I had never had Spam except as hot and sautéed.
> My family didn't have it very often....

I just bought a can this morning. I'm going to try it a few ways this
time with the frying.

On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 22:58:08 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
.. .
>> Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>>When I was in 6th grade, in Bowling Green, KY, my best friend, Molly
>>>Dodson,
>>>had a cold Spam sandwich with mayo on Wonder Bread every single day in her
>>>brown-bag lunch. I remember wondering how she could ever eat Spam "raw"
>>>and
>>>cold like that. LOL.
>>
>> I eat SPAM cold directly from the can but with mustard, never mayo.
>> Don't knock your friend Molly, she likely grew up enjoying her pink
>> meat with a creamy lusty swallow. hehe
>
>I did not write that post, I have had many cold Spam sandwiches, though I do
>prefer Spam cooked in various ways.
>
>Cherii

I also prefer SPAM cooked but I often have it cold as it comes from
the can, makes great sandwiches. Sometimes I heat the whole thing
with a brown sugar glaze in the microwave. I like it best cubed and
fried with onions and eggs. i don't see anything bad about SPAM, in
fact it's a very good product and at a reasonable price... I also like
Boar's Head Spiced Ham which is similar but costs three times as much.
Boar's Head products cost more than double up here in the sticks than
they do in NYC... I suppose due to the cost of transportation, they
insist on delivering with their custom refrigerated trucks, local and
cross country:
http://search.aol.com/aol/image?q=bo...ord_rol lover

>>"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>I also prefer SPAM cooked but I often have it cold as it comes from
>the can, makes great sandwiches. Sometimes I heat the whole thing
>with a brown sugar glaze in the microwave. I like it best cubed and
>fried with onions and eggs. i don't see anything bad about SPAM, in
>fact it's a very good product and at a reasonable price... I also like
>Boar's Head Spiced Ham which is similar but costs three times as much.
>Boar's Head products cost more than double up here in the sticks than
>they do in NYC... I suppose due to the cost of transportation, they
>insist on delivering with their custom refrigerated trucks, local and
>cross country:
>http://search.aol.com/aol/image?q=bo...ord_rol lover

When I was a child we used to have it cold in sandwiches but I have never
had it cooked.

My husband likes it so we keep a few tins in the store.

Please would those of you who use it cooked, share a few recipes and I will
try them out on him. I am sure he will be *very* pleased because it is not
something I make or serve)





--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Ophelia wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote in message
>>I also prefer SPAM cooked but I often have it cold as it comes from
>>the can, makes great sandwiches. Sometimes I heat the whole thing
>>with a brown sugar glaze in the microwave. I like it best cubed and
>>fried with onions and eggs. i don't see anything bad about SPAM, in
>>fact it's a very good product and at a reasonable price... I also like
>>Boar's Head Spiced Ham which is similar but costs three times as much.
>>Boar's Head products cost more than double up here in the sticks than
>>they do in NYC... I suppose due to the cost of transportation, they
>>insist on delivering with their custom refrigerated trucks, local and
>>cross country:
>>http://search.aol.com/aol/image?q=bo...ord_rol lover
>
>When I was a child we used to have it cold in sandwiches but I have never
>had it cooked.
>
>My husband likes it so we keep a few tins in the store.
>
>Please would those of you who use it cooked, share a few recipes and I will
>try them out on him. I am sure he will be *very* pleased because it is not
>something I make or serve)

This is a reasonably large recipe collection:
http://www.spam.com/recipes

Ophelia, I posted my favorite hot way to fix it already. Brown sugar and
pineapple....

N.

"Brooklyn1" wrote in message
...

"Ophelia wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote in message
>>I also prefer SPAM cooked but I often have it cold as it comes from
>>the can, makes great sandwiches. Sometimes I heat the whole thing
>>with a brown sugar glaze in the microwave. I like it best cubed and
>>fried with onions and eggs. i don't see anything bad about SPAM, in
>>fact it's a very good product and at a reasonable price... I also like
>>Boar's Head Spiced Ham which is similar but costs three times as much.
>>Boar's Head products cost more than double up here in the sticks than
>>they do in NYC... I suppose due to the cost of transportation, they
>>insist on delivering with their custom refrigerated trucks, local and
>>cross country:
>>http://search.aol.com/aol/image?q=bo...ord_rol lover
>
>When I was a child we used to have it cold in sandwiches but I have never
>had it cooked.
>
>My husband likes it so we keep a few tins in the store.
>
>Please would those of you who use it cooked, share a few recipes and I will
>try them out on him. I am sure he will be *very* pleased because it is not
>something I make or serve)

This is a reasonably large recipe collection:
http://www.spam.com/recipes
-------------------------------------



Thanks very much I will look through them and give some a go



--
http;//www.helpforheroes.org.uk