Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:35:17 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: >> "dsi1" <dsi1yahoo.com> wrote in message >> ... >> > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:31:29 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: >> >> "dsi1" <dsi10yahoo.com> wrote in message news:268c8664-10b9-4880-b896- >> >> >> >> Serious cooks don't play word games or make rationalizations about >> >> their >> >> fats. I won't call butter "shortening." Nobody in the real world >> >> actually >> >> believes that butter is the same as shortening. That's just something >> >> people >> >> say while in the land of Usenet. Get real man. >> >> >> >> ======== >> >> >> >> Serious cooks never smile. ;-) >> >> >> >> Cheri >> > >> > I'm not really a serious cook. ![]() >> >> Me either. :-) >> >> Cheri > > Mostly, I'm an experienced, practical, cook - unsophisticated in the > parlance of professional bakers. ![]() I consider myself that too. I cook simple foods that we like, meat loaf, soups, roasts, chicken, fish, and mostly prefer less involved recipes these days as opposed to the fancier recipes which I like to make when I'm in the mood, especially in cold weather. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:53:43 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" <dsi1ahoo.com> wrote in message > ... > > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:35:17 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > >> "dsi1" <dsi1yahoo.com> wrote in message > >> ... > >> > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:31:29 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > >> >> "dsi1" <dsi10yahoo.com> wrote in message news:268c8664-10b9-4880-b896- > >> >> > >> >> Serious cooks don't play word games or make rationalizations about > >> >> their > >> >> fats. I won't call butter "shortening." Nobody in the real world > >> >> actually > >> >> believes that butter is the same as shortening. That's just something > >> >> people > >> >> say while in the land of Usenet. Get real man. > >> >> > >> >> ======== > >> >> > >> >> Serious cooks never smile. ;-) > >> >> > >> >> Cheri > >> > > >> > I'm not really a serious cook. ![]() > >> > >> Me either. :-) > >> > >> Cheri > > > > Mostly, I'm an experienced, practical, cook - unsophisticated in the > > parlance of professional bakers. ![]() > > I consider myself that too. I cook simple foods that we like, meat loaf, > soups, roasts, chicken, fish, and mostly prefer less involved recipes these > days as opposed to the fancier recipes which I like to make when I'm in the > mood, especially in cold weather. > > Cheri My style is simple too. I made pork wrapped in taro leaves this evening. It was cooked in a slow cooker. https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/sh...hare_link_copy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cheri" wrote in message ...
"dsi1" > wrote in message ... > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 8:35:17 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: >> "dsi1" <dsi1yahoo.com> wrote in message >> ... >> > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:31:29 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: >> >> "dsi1" <dsi10yahoo.com> wrote in message news:268c8664-10b9-4880-b896- >> >> >> >> Serious cooks don't play word games or make rationalizations about >> >> their >> >> fats. I won't call butter "shortening." Nobody in the real world >> >> actually >> >> believes that butter is the same as shortening. That's just something >> >> people >> >> say while in the land of Usenet. Get real man. >> >> >> >> ======== >> >> >> >> Serious cooks never smile. ;-) >> >> >> >> Cheri >> > >> > I'm not really a serious cook. ![]() >> >> Me either. :-) >> >> Cheri > > Mostly, I'm an experienced, practical, cook - unsophisticated in the > parlance of professional bakers. ![]() I consider myself that too. I cook simple foods that we like, meat loaf, soups, roasts, chicken, fish, and mostly prefer less involved recipes these days as opposed to the fancier recipes which I like to make when I'm in the mood, especially in cold weather. Cheri ============ Yep ![]() ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:32:24 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote:
> "Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message > ... > > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 1:36:59 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote: > > > I do make something similar but it would be dumplings (made with flour and > > beef suet which turn out fluffy) on the top and of course, that is with > > gravy ![]() > > My husband and I favor a lean dumpling made with very little (or no) > fat, which I also cook from time to time. He doesn't care for stew over > biscuits, so when we have that he has his biscuits on the side. > Everybody wins. > > > Oh yes. All down to preferences ... ![]() > > > > Milk gravy? I've > > never had that but can't say it appeals to me much ![]() > > that? > > It's basically a thick béchamel made from the fat left when frying > something. I used to make it from the remains of frying chicken > (not deep-frying); sausage gravy is made from the fond left when > cooking crumbled sausage (and the sausage is added back to the > sauce before serving). > > I'd recommend pouring off all but a couple of tablespoons of fat, but > I'm sure that frugal (and impoverished) housewives left it all in, to > fuel their family's hard work on the farm. > > Cindy Hamilton > > > Of course!! <g> To me that sounds more like a sauce, but then > it's just different words to describe the same things eh? It's pretty common (as I understand it) on the U.S. East Coast to refer to a long-cooked ragu as "gravy". My pure guess on the origin is that when Italians started coming to America and were learning English, their neighbors didn't use the word "sauce" (which is kind of fancy), but did use "gravy". Thus, a saucy concoction served over food is "gravy". > I give you > 'biscuits' and 'scones' ![]() Yep. Could be parallel evolution of the foodstuffs. "Biscuits" are not cooked twice (as their name suggests), but if you're familiar with hardtack, it seems an easy transition to call them by the same thing. Before chemical leavening there was a "beaten biscuit" that rose because air was incorporated into the dough by literally hitting it with a hammer (or similar implement). These weren't tender like leavened biscuits, but looked pretty close to the same. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:11:24 PM UTC-4, dsi1 wrote:
> On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 7:31:29 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote: > > "dsi1" <dsi10yahoo.com> wrote in message news:268c8664-10b9-4880-b896- > > > > Serious cooks don't play word games or make rationalizations about their > > fats. I won't call butter "shortening." Nobody in the real world actually > > believes that butter is the same as shortening. That's just something people > > say while in the land of Usenet. Get real man. > > > > ======== > > > > Serious cooks never smile. ;-) > > > > Cheri > > I'm not really a serious cook. ![]() I'm not either, but I love information and the correct use of words. Sure, I typically abbreviate "partially hydrogenated vegetable shortening" as "shortening", but I do know the difference. Not that I use it, ever. If I wanted to make pastry with something besides butter, I'd probably use lard. I've got a source for un-hydrogenated lard of high quality. It's kind of moot, though. I don't bake very much because I'd end up eating the whole thing and gaining back some of the weight I've worked so hard to lose. If I want a little dessert, I go to the bakery that also sells the lard (they're very big on people loving and making good food) and buy a cupcake or a slice of pie. Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
... On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:32:24 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote: > "Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message > ... > > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 1:36:59 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote: > > > I do make something similar but it would be dumplings (made with flour > > and > > beef suet which turn out fluffy) on the top and of course, that is with > > gravy ![]() > > My husband and I favor a lean dumpling made with very little (or no) > fat, which I also cook from time to time. He doesn't care for stew over > biscuits, so when we have that he has his biscuits on the side. > Everybody wins. > > > Oh yes. All down to preferences ... ![]() > > > > Milk gravy? I've > > never had that but can't say it appeals to me much ![]() > > that? > > It's basically a thick béchamel made from the fat left when frying > something. I used to make it from the remains of frying chicken > (not deep-frying); sausage gravy is made from the fond left when > cooking crumbled sausage (and the sausage is added back to the > sauce before serving). > > I'd recommend pouring off all but a couple of tablespoons of fat, but > I'm sure that frugal (and impoverished) housewives left it all in, to > fuel their family's hard work on the farm. > > Cindy Hamilton > > > Of course!! <g> To me that sounds more like a sauce, but > then > it's just different words to describe the same things eh? It's pretty common (as I understand it) on the U.S. East Coast to refer to a long-cooked ragu as "gravy". My pure guess on the origin is that when Italians started coming to America and were learning English, their neighbors didn't use the word "sauce" (which is kind of fancy), but did use "gravy". Thus, a saucy concoction served over food is "gravy". Odd how names stick ![]() 'butt'? It just sounds topsy turvey to me, but I expect there will be a good reason ![]() > I give you > 'biscuits' and 'scones' ![]() Yep. Could be parallel evolution of the foodstuffs. "Biscuits" are not cooked twice (as their name suggests), but if you're familiar with hardtack, it seems an easy transition to call them by the same thing. Before chemical leavening there was a "beaten biscuit" that rose because air was incorporated into the dough by literally hitting it with a hammer (or similar implement). These weren't tender like leavened biscuits, but looked pretty close to the same. Cindy Hamilton Given what I read about being baked 4 times, maybe hardtack should be called bibiscuits <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 7:51:19 AM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote:
> Odd how names stick ![]() > 'butt'? It just sounds topsy turvey to me, but I expect there will be a > good reason ![]() Apparently, pork shoulder was at some point in history preserved and/or shipped in barrels (aka "butts"). The name of the container became the name of the meat. > > I give you > > 'biscuits' and 'scones' ![]() > > Yep. Could be parallel evolution of the foodstuffs. "Biscuits" are > not cooked twice (as their name suggests), but if you're familiar > with hardtack, it seems an easy transition to call them by the same > thing. Before chemical leavening there was a "beaten biscuit" that > rose because air was incorporated into the dough by literally hitting > it with a hammer (or similar implement). These weren't tender like > leavened biscuits, but looked pretty close to the same. > > Cindy Hamilton > > Given what I read about being baked 4 times, maybe hardtack > should be called bibiscuits <g> <snort> Cindy Hamilton |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave, FYI, I (and probably lots of others) regularly use butter and cream in
biscuits. I think the difference is that scones are denser in texture. N. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > It's kind of moot, though. I don't bake very much because I'd end > up eating the whole thing and gaining back some of the weight I've > worked so hard to lose. If I want a little dessert, I go to the > bakery that also sells the lard (they're very big on people loving > and making good food) and buy a cupcake or a slice of pie. I'm the same way. I rarely make dessert food. If it's here, I'll eat it. Safer for me to just buy a one-time portion from the bakery or so. For my birthday a little over a year ago, rather than make a carrot cake, I just bought a little 3" square carrot cake. One time treat and no leftovers to eat for days. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> > "Gary" wrote in message ... > > Ophelia wrote: > > > > So, no 'biscuits' for me until it feels good ![]() > > Just wondering. Did you ever make that chicken recipe with onion soup > mix, pineapple and cherries? I would like to hear what you two thought > about it. It sounded interesting. > > -------------------------- > > Not yet but I have everything I need. We have been travelling again but when > I am home it is on my to do list ![]() > soup mixture up before we left. I haven't put any salt in it because I > prefer to taste it before I add any. > > I have been meaning to ask you though. Do you actually make up that soup? > If so, how much water to you add to that 1 oz of mix? It seems to be it > would be very thin soup, yes? > > Do you want the recipe? Heh you might get to make it before I do ![]() Please send the recipe. I'll make it soon. Only one change I would make from what you have mentioned. I would cut up the chicken into bite size portions and serve it all over rice, rather than cook whole breasts. I'll do a few whole breasts too though the first time. Oh... and about the Onion soup mix. I've only used it to add to sour cream to make a chip dip. And some people add it to meatloaf. I would NEVER make onion soup with it. And if you wanted to make the soup, they say to add 4 cups of water to one envelope of the mix. Sounds more like "onion tea" to me. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary" wrote in message ...
Ophelia wrote: > > "Gary" wrote in message ... > > Ophelia wrote: > > > > So, no 'biscuits' for me until it feels good ![]() > > Just wondering. Did you ever make that chicken recipe with onion soup > mix, pineapple and cherries? I would like to hear what you two thought > about it. It sounded interesting. > > -------------------------- > > Not yet but I have everything I need. We have been travelling again but > when > I am home it is on my to do list ![]() > soup mixture up before we left. I haven't put any salt in it because I > prefer to taste it before I add any. > > I have been meaning to ask you though. Do you actually make up that soup? > If so, how much water to you add to that 1 oz of mix? It seems to be it > would be very thin soup, yes? > > Do you want the recipe? Heh you might get to make it before I do ![]() Please send the recipe. I'll make it soon. Only one change I would make from what you have mentioned. I would cut up the chicken into bite size portions and serve it all over rice, rather than cook whole breasts. I'll do a few whole breasts too though the first time. Yes, I agree. Not sure I will use those cherries either. I like the idea of the rest though. Oh... and about the Onion soup mix. I've only used it to add to sour cream to make a chip dip. And some people add it to meatloaf. I would NEVER make onion soup with it. And if you wanted to make the soup, they say to add 4 cups of water to one envelope of the mix. Sounds more like "onion tea" to me. Yes, that is what I thought and I was curious! Chicken with Pineapple · 6 split chicken breasts (bone-in) · 2 tablespoons butter or margarine, melted · 1 can (20 oz.) pineapple chunks in natural juice, undrained · 1/4 cup maraschino cherries, halved, optional · 1 envelope Lipton Recipe Secrets Onion Recipe Soup Mix Set the oven broiler to high, usually 500° F. Line a shallow baking pan with foil, leaving long ends to fold over and encase the chicken later. Arrange the chicken breasts in the pan and brush with the melted butter. Broil the chicken for 10 minutes or until lightly browned on both sides. Reduce oven temperature to 350° F (180° C/Gas 4). In a medium bowl, combine remaining ingredients and then pour the mixture over the chicken. Bring the ends of the foil over the chicken and seal the edges with a double fold, encasing the chicken completely. Bake for 45 minutes or until chicken is done. Make about 6 servings. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:55:52 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote: > Dave, FYI, I (and probably lots of others) regularly use butter and cream in > biscuits. I think the difference is that scones are denser in texture. > > N. I, personally, don't like dense/heavy scones - so I have learned to substitute Greek yogurt for the butter. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 9:18:10 AM UTC-10, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 09:55:52 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2 > > wrote: > > > Dave, FYI, I (and probably lots of others) regularly use butter and cream in > > biscuits. I think the difference is that scones are denser in texture. > > > > N. > > I, personally, don't like dense/heavy scones - so I have learned to > substitute Greek yogurt for the butter. > > -- > I love cooking with wine. > Sometimes I even put it in the food. Obviously this means that yogurt is shortening. ![]() I've been eating some yogurt these days. I have to quit because it makes me constipated - so much for probiotics. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "dsi1" > wrote in message news:f9f60cf2-d0fa-4d6f-b298- > My style is simple too. I made pork wrapped in taro leaves this evening. > It was cooked in a slow cooker. > > https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/sh...hare_link_copy I bet that was good! Tomorrow I'm going to try the butter biscuit recipe you posted, along with roast chicken, baked potato, and carrots. I don't usually eat biscuits, breads, etc. but I am going to have one of those with my chicken. ![]() Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/2016 6:33 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:32:24 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote: >> >> Of course!! <g> To me that sounds more like a sauce, but then >> it's just different words to describe the same things eh? > > It's pretty common (as I understand it) on the U.S. East Coast to refer > to a long-cooked ragu as "gravy". My pure guess on the origin is that > when Italians started coming to America and were learning English, their > neighbors didn't use the word "sauce" (which is kind of fancy), but did > use "gravy". Thus, a saucy concoction served over food is "gravy". Could even be a regional thing in Italy. My wife's grandparents came from southern Italy in the early 1900's and she was brought up calling it gravy. So do these guys http://tuttorossotomatoes.com/recipe...-italian-gravy https://jovinacooksitalian.com/2014/...-sunday-gravy/ The passage from sugo/salsa to sauce/gravy must have occurred when immigrant families settled into new neighborhoods in the U.S. and became an Italian-American family/neighborhood tradition more than anything else. Some immigrants translated the Italian for what they put on their pasta as gravy, while others translated it as sauce and the translations have been passed down through the generations, becoming the definitive lable in the process. People get amazingly passionate over things like this. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/6/2016 7:50 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> > Odd how names stick ![]() > 'butt'? It just sounds topsy turvey to me, but I expect there will be > a good reason ![]() > Butt is not the rear portion of the hog. Cheaper cuts of pork like the shoulder were packed in barrels, often called "butts". Boston was a place where many were shipped to, this the Boston Butt name. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:00:11 -0500, heyjoe >
wrote: > On Sat, 03 Sep 2016 17:14:52 -0700, sf wrote: > > > By "all fats", do you mean oil? I've never tried it, so I have > > nothing to add to the discussion. Just wondering if you have given it > > a shot. > > Apparently I'm a cooking heathen, so I hesitiate to chime in. But I use > vegetable oil instead of butter, shortening or lard to make drop > biscuits. > > > Not Flaky Biscuits Nice seeing you back, Joe! His butter biscuits are more like a cake than what I consider a biscuit. Hubby says it toasts up nice and crispy for his breakfast though, so he's happy with it. -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message ... > On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 18:00:11 -0500, heyjoe > > wrote: > >> On Sat, 03 Sep 2016 17:14:52 -0700, sf wrote: >> >> > By "all fats", do you mean oil? I've never tried it, so I have >> > nothing to add to the discussion. Just wondering if you have given it >> > a shot. >> >> Apparently I'm a cooking heathen, so I hesitiate to chime in. But I use >> vegetable oil instead of butter, shortening or lard to make drop >> biscuits. >> >> >> Not Flaky Biscuits > > Nice seeing you back, Joe! His butter biscuits are more like a cake > than what I consider a biscuit. Hubby says it toasts up nice and > crispy for his breakfast though, so he's happy with it. I'm going to leave the sugar out. I don't care for it in biscuits or cornbread or scones or.... Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, September 6, 2016 at 11:46:51 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" <dsi1yahoo.com> wrote in message news:f9f60cf2-d0fa-4d6f-b298- > > > My style is simple too. I made pork wrapped in taro leaves this evening.. > > It was cooked in a slow cooker. > > > > https://www.amazon.com/clouddrive/sh...hare_link_copy > > I bet that was good! Tomorrow I'm going to try the butter biscuit recipe you > posted, along with roast chicken, baked potato, and carrots. I don't usually > eat biscuits, breads, etc. but I am going to have one of those with my > chicken. ![]() > > Cheri I can't say how this dish would go over on the mainland but it sorta tastes like shredded pork and spinach. It's kind of tricky to cook because the taro leaves have to be well steamed to dissolve the sharp calcium oxalate crystals in the stems and leaves or you'll get some throat irritation. I did get some of that last night. Chicken and biscuit go great together. The trouble is that I rarely get a chance to eat the two together. Good eating to you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-09-06, heyjoe > wrote:
> Try using 1/2 unsalted butter and 1/2 shortening. The taste is better > than all shortening, IMO. I agree, sort of. I use 1/3 shortening and 2/3 butter. I also cut in the fats very coarsely. Basically, my pie dough looks like Barb's apple pie dough. Barb, can you post a link? I've lost track. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 17:01:55 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote: > I'm going to leave the sugar out. I don't care for it in biscuits or > cornbread or scones or.... Baker's choice. I left it out, but I do like a little in both cornbread and scones (but not savory scones). -- I love cooking with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
news ![]() On 9/6/2016 6:33 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote: > On Monday, September 5, 2016 at 2:32:24 PM UTC-4, Ophelia wrote: >> >> Of course!! <g> To me that sounds more like a sauce, but >> then >> it's just different words to describe the same things eh? > > It's pretty common (as I understand it) on the U.S. East Coast to refer > to a long-cooked ragu as "gravy". My pure guess on the origin is that > when Italians started coming to America and were learning English, their > neighbors didn't use the word "sauce" (which is kind of fancy), but did > use "gravy". Thus, a saucy concoction served over food is "gravy". Could even be a regional thing in Italy. My wife's grandparents came from southern Italy in the early 1900's and she was brought up calling it gravy. So do these guys http://tuttorossotomatoes.com/recipe...-italian-gravy https://jovinacooksitalian.com/2014/...-sunday-gravy/ The passage from sugo/salsa to sauce/gravy must have occurred when immigrant families settled into new neighborhoods in the U.S. and became an Italian-American family/neighborhood tradition more than anything else. Some immigrants translated the Italian for what they put on their pasta as gravy, while others translated it as sauce and the translations have been passed down through the generations, becoming the definitive lable in the process. People get amazingly passionate over things like this. ========= I noticed ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
news ![]() On 9/6/2016 7:50 AM, Ophelia wrote: > > Odd how names stick ![]() > 'butt'? It just sounds topsy turvey to me, but I expect there will be > a good reason ![]() > Butt is not the rear portion of the hog. Cheaper cuts of pork like the shoulder were packed in barrels, often called "butts". Boston was a place where many were shipped to, this the Boston Butt name. =============== Ahhhhhhh!!! Now I understand ![]() ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/5/2016 1:03 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> Once in a while I make chicken (or turkey) stew and biscuits, > then serve the stew over the biscuits. Voila. Biscuits with > gravy. My mother and grandmother made drop biscuits to cook in beef stew. I make dumplings to drop in chicken stew. Mom and grandma served chicken stew over biscuits. Jill |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Buffalo Roast Chicken -> Ghanian Peanut Chicken Soup | General Cooking | |||
Springfield Missouri Cashew Chicken Nugget & Chicken Fried Rice | Recipes (moderated) | |||
A healthier Wendy's Spicy Chicken ( batter of baked chicken ). | General Cooking | |||
Vertical Chicken Roaster: CAJUN ROAST CHICKEN WITH CORN BREAD | Recipes | |||
Vertical Chicken Roaster: Lynne's Vertically Roasted Chicken | Recipes |