In article >,
says...
>
> "Bruce" wrote in message
> T...
>
> In article >,
> says...
> >
> > "Bruce" wrote in message
> > T...

> > > I saw all these English people on TV who were going: "I just
wanted to
> > > make a statement. I didn't really want us to leave the EU! Can we vote
> > > again, please?" lol
> > >
> > > ============
> > >
> > > How many? There are plenty of those who voted remain because they were
> > > warned we get WWIII if we left and are now finding out that we are doing
> > > well.
> >
> > The damage is still coming. You're not out yet. UK is very hesitant to
> > actually cut the umbilical cord But I can understand that it's
> > psychologically nice te be out. Maybe it will be worth it that way.
> >
> > ================
> >
> > We don't like being controlled by unelected people.
>
> I don't think anybody does. Russians with their Putin maybe.
>
> ==============
>
> We got a choice, they don't.

Yes

In article >, says...
>
> Bruce wrote:
> >
> > In article >, says...
> > >
> > > I'll take the chance with Trump but I've always said, he's not very
> > > presidential. He's shaking up Washington and I like that. He also scares
> > > the foreigners. I like that too.
> >
> > I'm still wondering. Imagine the whole world is shaking in their boots
> > because Trump is president of the US. What will you get out of that? Is
> > there something you want that other countries aren't giving you because
> > they're not scared yet?
>
> Just teasing the foreigners here who think he'll start WW3.
> I do love the shaking up of DC though. Both parties in the House ant
> Senate are very worried.

I like that too. Kicking politicians out of their comfort zone's a good
thing.

In article >, says...
>
> wrote:
> >
> > In Canada the ratio of female CEOs is dismal, mostly because
> > the men in power don't consider the woman could do the same job,
> > usually better too.
>
> Why usually better? Are you biased?

Lucreatia's the opposite of a male chauvinist pig. A female chauvinist
pig, but that sounds so harsh. We have to find a new term.

Bruce wrote:
>Gary wrote:
>> lucretia wrote:
>> >
>> > In Canada the ratio of female CEOs is dismal, mostly because
>> > the men in power don't consider the woman could do the same job,
>> > usually better too.
>>
>> Why usually better? Are you biased?
>
>Lucreatia's the opposite of a male chauvinist pig. A female chauvinist
>pig, but that sounds so harsh. We have to find a new term.

Not opposite... Lucreatia's the *same* as a male chauvinist pig, just
call her a Dick! LOL

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:59:49 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-09-16 7:02 PM, wrote:
>
>> That's where I differ from you, I pick the one I think is the best
>> candidate, be it male or female. Now, if men could just learn to do
>> that, think how many women as 51% of the population would have better
>> jobs. In Canada the ratio of female CEOs is dismal, mostly because
>> the men in power don't consider the woman could do the same job,
>> usually better too.
>
>If they ran their own businesses they would be CEOs. If they were
>really capable of being CEO in a major corporation, they would be. It's
>a tough job to be a CEO and there is a lot of politicking and networking
>involved.
>
>
Why does it not surprise me you would think that !

On 2016-09-17 5:27 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 15:59:49 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>> On 2016-09-16 7:02 PM, wrote:
>>
>>> That's where I differ from you, I pick the one I think is the best
>>> candidate, be it male or female. Now, if men could just learn to do
>>> that, think how many women as 51% of the population would have better
>>> jobs. In Canada the ratio of female CEOs is dismal, mostly because
>>> the men in power don't consider the woman could do the same job,
>>> usually better too.
>>
>> If they ran their own businesses they would be CEOs. If they were
>> really capable of being CEO in a major corporation, they would be. It's
>> a tough job to be a CEO and there is a lot of politicking and networking
>> involved.
>>
>>
> Why does it not surprise me you would think that !
>

I don't know. Maybe it is because it is true?

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:42:42 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>Yep, and no one else has a key to my house. If, for some reason,
>Security needs to get in they'll have to break one of the glass panels
>by the front door.
>
>Jill

did you know you can take a thin plastic card and shove it in the
crack where the strike bolt from the door knob engages the hole in the
door jam and voila...magic...the door opens for you...

use a card thinner than a credit card for optimum results but a credit
card will work if you don't care about bending it...a plastic business
card works great

take a look at this demonstration...


https://youtu.be/IC9n-0GAhRQ


William

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 12:13:34 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 9/16/2016 10:16 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:52:26 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>> The shit old people do to occupy their time is unbelievable.
>>
>> Like you, for example. Stalking somebody online.
>>
>Isn't Alex (or whatever his name morphs into) stupid? He makes lame
>comments about what I post as if it will affect me in some way.

Yeah. It's pretty weird.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:18:58 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>I called her back. I didn't know *why* she was calling and was merely
>guessing she wanted to know why Security was at my house. I didn't know
>what I was going to tell her. But no, she didn't ask about that. She
>asked did I turn on his lights or did she? What?!
>
>That tells me she must have made a copy of his house key when she had
>it. I called him this morning and suggested he change his locks. He
>said he'll think about it. What the heck is there to think about? LOL

Careful. She might start thinking youre the 'other woman'...

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:04:11 -0400, William > wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:42:42 -0400, jmcquown >
>wrote:
>
>>Yep, and no one else has a key to my house. If, for some reason,
>>Security needs to get in they'll have to break one of the glass panels
>>by the front door.
>>
>>Jill
>
>did you know you can take a thin plastic card and shove it in the
>crack where the strike bolt from the door knob engages the hole in the
>door jam and voila...magic...the door opens for you...
>
>use a card thinner than a credit card for optimum results but a credit
>card will work if you don't care about bending it...a plastic business
>card works great
>
>take a look at this demonstration...
>
>
>https://youtu.be/IC9n-0GAhRQ
>
>
>William

Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:52:46 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>I do love the shaking up of DC though. Both parties in the House ant
>Senate are very worried.

On that we can agree. If the world did manage to survive a Trump
presidency, at least the mainstream parties would be forced to
represent the average person and not their multi-billionaire masters.
They would have to restructure their entire organisations right from
grass roots level, which would take time until the last of the
hanger-on parasites were eliminated.

At the very least, a major shake up is in the works. And not just for
the U.S either.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 04:06:16 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 5:28:18 PM UTC-4, Bruce wrote:
>> In article >,
>> says...
>> >
>> > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 11:55:44 AM UTC-6, Bruce wrote:
>> > > In article >,
>> > > says...
>> > > >
>> > > > On 2016-09-16 12:40 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> > > > > On Friday, September 16, 2016 at 11:36:13 AM UTC-4, Gary wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > >> Same here. It's worth a try. We'll get change and just have to hope it's
>> > > > >> better change.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > So you're willing to bet that the step into the dark won't be a
>> > > > > disaster? Sorry, not me. In fact, it's not even that dark. Trump
>> > > > > has proved untrustworthy by his actions time and time again.
>> > > >
>> > > > No argument that he has proved himself unreliable. From what we have
>> > > > read and heard about him you would be a fool to do business with him.
>> > > > Yet, he has a lot of support.
>> > >
>> > > Bush Jr got elected and re-elected. Probably by the same demographic.
>> > > Ronald Reagan, Arnold Schwarzenegger. Lots of voters like candidates who
>> > > are as stupid as they are.
>> >
>> > Speak for yourself Brucy...I want people who are even smarter than myself to govern. Gawd only knows we don't get the best or haven't so far.
>> > =====
>>
>> I wasn't speaking for myself or for you. But lots of people like to vote
>> for a simpleton, because brainier people scare them or turn them off.
>> This tendency could be stronger in some countries than in others (he
>> said cautiously).
>
>I'll be incautious. The American people have had a long, long mistrust of
>educated and intelligent people.

That's also true in some parts of Australia.

On 9/17/2016 6:18 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:04:11 -0400, William > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:42:42 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Yep, and no one else has a key to my house. If, for some reason,
>>> Security needs to get in they'll have to break one of the glass panels
>>> by the front door.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>
>> did you know you can take a thin plastic card and shove it in the
>> crack where the strike bolt from the door knob engages the hole in the
>> door jam and voila...magic...the door opens for you...
>>
>> use a card thinner than a credit card for optimum results but a credit
>> card will work if you don't care about bending it...a plastic business
>> card works great
>>
>> take a look at this demonstration...
>>
>>
>> https://youtu.be/IC9n-0GAhRQ
>>
>>
>> William
>
> Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.
>
Yeah, I don't use some flimsy little doorknob lock.

Jill

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:


>Well, I'm not too sure about Bush,

HW Bush was as cunning as a rat. One look at his entire career proves
that.

> but all of those guys were good at
>folksy charm. "Yeah, I might be a patrician rich guy from Massachusetts,
>but I put my pants on one leg at a time." Being a veteran didn't hurt
>Kennedy any at the polls.
>
>Plus, we didn't have the 24-hour news cycle churning up maximum grist
>for its mill.
>
>Incidentally, Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't dumb. He made most of his money
>in real estate, if I recall correctly.

I thought he got his start from fellatio?

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 05:08:55 -0700, Taxed and Spent
> wrote:


>some of those educated and intelligent people are liars and crooks.

No more or less than less intelligent people.

In article >, says...
>
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>
> >Well, I'm not too sure about Bush,
>
> HW Bush was as cunning as a rat. One look at his entire career proves
> that.

That confirms that he's not stupid.

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 08:33:58 +1000, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, says...
>>
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Well, I'm not too sure about Bush,
>>
>> HW Bush was as cunning as a rat. One look at his entire career proves
>> that.
>
>That confirms that he's not stupid.

Err, yeah. That was my point.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 19:18:44 -0300, wrote:

>On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:04:11 -0400, William > wrote:
>>did you know you can take a thin plastic card and shove it in the
>>crack where the strike bolt from the door knob engages the hole in the
>>door jam and voila...magic...the door opens for you...
>>
>>use a card thinner than a credit card for optimum results but a credit
>>card will work if you don't care about bending it...a plastic business
>>card works great
>>
>>take a look at this demonstration...
>>
>>
>>https://youtu.be/IC9n-0GAhRQ
>>
>
>Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.

That trick doesnt work more often than it does work.

Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:58:37 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>> Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:52:26 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 9/16/2016 8:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:13:36 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since my neighbor told me he'd alerted Security about her, and I
>>>>>>> spotted
>>>>>>> her walking up to his front door this evening, I decided to call
>>>>>>> Security. I was sure the guy I spoke with must have thought I was a
>>>>>>> nut.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apparently not. I got a call back. The Security guard who called me
>>>>>>> said HE was the one who warned her multiple times about staying off his
>>>>>>> property and to stay away from him. Apparently they have quite a file
>>>>>>> on these two, and even the Sheriff's department was involved at some
>>>>>>> point. The guy from Security also works as a fire fighter so he has
>>>>>>> cop
>>>>>>> buddies. He kept them from coming over but it sounded like they wanted
>>>>>>> to arrest her.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The complaints are all on HIS side. Yes, she has been known to just
>>>>>>> walk into his house uninvited. Multiple times. Okay, that's just
>>>>>>> plain
>>>>>>> weird.
>>>>>> https://pmctvline2.files.wordpress.c...ries.jpg?w=514
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, saw the movie (it was creepy, and not the best way to cook rabbit).
>>>>>
>>>>> Just so happens my that female neighbor just called me. I did not
>>>>> answer the phone. I'm sure she's going to ask why Security was at my
>>>>> house.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>> The shit old people do to occupy their time is unbelievable.
>>> Like you, for example. Stalking somebody online.
>> **** off.
> Make me.
Are you twelve?

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:34:40 -0400, Alex > wrote:

>Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:58:37 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>> Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:52:26 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/16/2016 8:34 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:13:36 -0400, jmcquown >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since my neighbor told me he'd alerted Security about her, and I
>>>>>>>> spotted
>>>>>>>> her walking up to his front door this evening, I decided to call
>>>>>>>> Security. I was sure the guy I spoke with must have thought I was a
>>>>>>>> nut.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Apparently not. I got a call back. The Security guard who called me
>>>>>>>> said HE was the one who warned her multiple times about staying off his
>>>>>>>> property and to stay away from him. Apparently they have quite a file
>>>>>>>> on these two, and even the Sheriff's department was involved at some
>>>>>>>> point. The guy from Security also works as a fire fighter so he has
>>>>>>>> cop
>>>>>>>> buddies. He kept them from coming over but it sounded like they wanted
>>>>>>>> to arrest her.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The complaints are all on HIS side. Yes, she has been known to just
>>>>>>>> walk into his house uninvited. Multiple times. Okay, that's just
>>>>>>>> plain
>>>>>>>> weird.
>>>>>>> https://pmctvline2.files.wordpress.c...ries.jpg?w=514
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, saw the movie (it was creepy, and not the best way to cook rabbit).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just so happens my that female neighbor just called me. I did not
>>>>>> answer the phone. I'm sure she's going to ask why Security was at my
>>>>>> house.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>> The shit old people do to occupy their time is unbelievable.
>>>> Like you, for example. Stalking somebody online.
>>> **** off.
>> Make me.
>Are you twelve?

Yes. Four times over, in fact.

Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>> Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we know
>>>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent pic,
>>>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>>>> same.
>>>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>>>> sending.
>>>>>>
>>>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>>> I knew you'd show up.
>> So you know the truth, too.
> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
You're better off not seeing the before and after.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:43:23 -0400, Alex > wrote:

>Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>> Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we know
>>>>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent pic,
>>>>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>>>>> same.
>>>>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>>>>> sending.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>
>>>>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>>
>>> So you know the truth, too.
>>
>> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>
>You're better off not seeing the before and after.

Ahh. So the hormone therapy made your tits grow on your forehead?
Now I understand your choice of name. 'Alex' is nice and ambiguous in
terms of sexuality.

Anyway,as I said before, I really don't want to know the truth about
you.

On 9/16/2016 10:15 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>> jmcquown wrote:
>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>> not
>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we know
>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>
>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent pic,
>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>
>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>
>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>> same.
>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>> sending.
>>>>
>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>
>>> Jill
>>>
>>
>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>
> I knew you'd show up.
>
We both knew it. I don't pay any attention to his posts.

As for the Glamour Shot it was taken 12 years ago, not 20... unless he's
been stalking me for much longer than I thought. That's what I looked
like. So what if I had professional photos taken? I don't sit around
taking "selfies". (Heck, I didn't even know what that term meant until
a couple of years ago.)

Chatty Cathy doesn't bother to maintain the RFC web site anymore. I
haven't seen her post here in a very long time. Gary's suggestion that
we submit updated pictures really won't fly unless someone else is
planning to take over the web hosting.

Jill

On 9/16/2016 11:04 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>
>> So you know the truth, too.
>
> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>
I usually try to ignore this stuff but I wonder WTF he thinks the
"truth" is?! I have no idea what this loser is talking about.

Jill

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:54:10 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 9/16/2016 11:04 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>>
>>> So you know the truth, too.
>>
>> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>>
>I usually try to ignore this stuff but I wonder WTF he thinks the
>"truth" is?! I have no idea what this loser is talking about.

Who knows what's in it's head? Strange that it's fixated on you when
you're not one to get nasty or obnoxious.

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:52:48 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 9/16/2016 10:15 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we know
>>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent pic,
>>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>>
>>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>>> same.
>>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>>> sending.
>>>>>
>>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>
>>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>>
>> I knew you'd show up.
>>
>We both knew it. I don't pay any attention to his posts.
>
>As for the Glamour Shot it was taken 12 years ago, not 20... unless he's
>been stalking me for much longer than I thought. That's what I looked
>like. So what if I had professional photos taken? I don't sit around
>taking "selfies". (Heck, I didn't even know what that term meant until
>a couple of years ago.)
>
>Chatty Cathy doesn't bother to maintain the RFC web site anymore. I
>haven't seen her post here in a very long time. Gary's suggestion that
>we submit updated pictures really won't fly unless someone else is
>planning to take over the web hosting.

Yeah. In a way, it would be a shame to see it fade into history. It
doesn't serve much purpose anymore and is somewhat archaic... but I
kinda like that (much like Usenet itself). It would be nice to see
somebody take it over. Don't expect me to add a pic of myself
though... unless it's a *very* old pic

On 9/17/2016 8:57 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:54:10 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/2016 11:04 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>>>
>>>> So you know the truth, too.
>>>
>>> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>>>
>> I usually try to ignore this stuff but I wonder WTF he thinks the
>> "truth" is?! I have no idea what this loser is talking about.
>
> Who knows what's in it's head? Strange that it's fixated on you when
> you're not one to get nasty or obnoxious.
>
For some reason this person obsessed with my looks. I'm willing to bet
"Alex" isn't a living example of 'The Picture of Dorian Grey'. Unless
you're dead, everyone gets older. Time didn't halt for him any more
than it did me. Haven't seen a picture of him, have we? LOL

As it is, I don't believe I look all that bad for a 56 year old woman.

Jill

Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:43:23 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>> Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Je?us wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>>>>>> not
>>>>>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we know
>>>>>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent pic,
>>>>>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>>>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>>>>>> same.
>>>>>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>>>>>> sending.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>>>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>>> So you know the truth, too.
>>> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>> You're better off not seeing the before and after.
> Ahh. So the hormone therapy made your tits grow on your forehead?
> Now I understand your choice of name. 'Alex' is nice and ambiguous in
> terms of sexuality.
>
> Anyway,as I said before, I really don't want to know the truth about
> you.

You don't read well.

Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:54:10 -0400, jmcquown >
> wrote:
>
>> On 9/16/2016 11:04 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 22:59:21 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I knew you'd show up.
>>>> So you know the truth, too.
>>> Umm, no. Not sure I want to either.
>>>
>> I usually try to ignore this stuff but I wonder WTF he thinks the
>> "truth" is?! I have no idea what this loser is talking about.
> Who knows what's in it's head? Strange that it's fixated on you when
> you're not one to get nasty or obnoxious.

She loved to attack Julie whenever she had the chance and was very nasty
and occasionally obnoxious. She's now responding to many other posts
and inserting her opinion as if it was requested. Are you her handler?

jmcquown wrote:
> On 9/16/2016 10:15 PM, Je�us wrote:
>> On Fri, 16 Sep 2016 21:56:01 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>>
>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>> On 9/16/2016 1:25 PM, Gary wrote:
>>>>> jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't think anyone has a pic of Sheldon, other than the one on the
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> up to date web site which shows him looking like he's 30 when we
>>>>>> know
>>>>>> he's in his 70's. heh
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that's the only one we've seen. Since he won't post a recent
>>>>> pic,
>>>>> maybe he lying about still being alive. hehehh
>>>>>
>>>>> He's 73 now. I'm 63 now.
>>>>> I last posted a pic of me about 7 years ago at my daughter's wedding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Challenge to all here. Post a recent pic of yourself and I'll do the
>>>>> same.
>>>>> In my case, I'll have to take about 20 pics before I find one worth
>>>>> sending.
>>>>>
>>>> No thanks. People shouldn't care what I look like.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>>
>>>
>>> You cared when you posted that Glamour Shot from 20 years ago, eh?
>>
>> I knew you'd show up.
>>
> We both knew it. I don't pay any attention to his posts.
>
> As for the Glamour Shot it was taken 12 years ago, not 20... unless
> he's been stalking me for much longer than I thought. That's what I
> looked like. So what if I had professional photos taken? I don't sit
> around taking "selfies". (Heck, I didn't even know what that term
> meant until a couple of years ago.)
>
> Chatty Cathy doesn't bother to maintain the RFC web site anymore. I
> haven't seen her post here in a very long time. Gary's suggestion
> that we submit updated pictures really won't fly unless someone else
> is planning to take over the web hosting.
>
> Jill

So it was 12 years ago unless I have been "stalking" you? WTF does that
mean? It was 12 years ago but someone can prove it was longer?

On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:29:03 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 9/17/2016 6:18 PM, wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 18:04:11 -0400, William > wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 11:42:42 -0400, jmcquown >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep, and no one else has a key to my house. If, for some reason,
>>>> Security needs to get in they'll have to break one of the glass panels
>>>> by the front door.
>>>>
>>>> Jill
>>>
>>> did you know you can take a thin plastic card and shove it in the
>>> crack where the strike bolt from the door knob engages the hole in the
>>> door jam and voila...magic...the door opens for you...
>>>
>>> use a card thinner than a credit card for optimum results but a credit
>>> card will work if you don't care about bending it...a plastic business
>>> card works great
>>>
>>> take a look at this demonstration...
>>>
>>>
>>> https://youtu.be/IC9n-0GAhRQ
>>>
>>>
>>> William
>>
>> Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.
>>
>Yeah, I don't use some flimsy little doorknob lock.

Door locks only keep honest people out.

On 2016-09-17 8:41 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 20:34:40 -0400, Alex > wrote:

>>>>>> The shit old people do to occupy their time is unbelievable.
>>>>> Like you, for example. Stalking somebody online.
>>>> **** off.
>>> Make me.
>> Are you twelve?
>
> Yes. Four times over, in fact.
>


Your threatening manner probably made him think you were older than he is.

On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:30:52 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
>
> >Well, I'm not too sure about Bush,

Bush the elder was perhaps low on folksy charm. He had the advantage
of being the Vice President when he ran for POTUS.

Cindy Hamilton

On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:18:50 PM UTC-4, wrote:

> Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.

But there are other ways to break (many) deadbolts:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping>

Cindy Hamilton

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:42:24 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:30:52 PM UTC-4, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>> >Well, I'm not too sure about Bush,
>
>Bush the elder was perhaps low on folksy charm. He had the advantage
>of being the Vice President when he ran for POTUS.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

That's a good way to describe him. He was well liked in Beijing from
his time there. I also loved the moment when an interviewer asked
Barbara about her lovely pearls she wore so much and she told them
they were Woolworth imitations and they covered the wrinkles in her
neck

On Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:45:58 -0700 (PDT), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:18:50 PM UTC-4, wrote:
>
>> Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.
>
>But there are other ways to break (many) deadbolts:
>
><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping>
>
>Cindy Hamilton

Well for everything there is, someone will be challenged to defeat it

"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:18:50 PM UTC-4, wrote:

> Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.

But there are other ways to break (many) deadbolts:

<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping>

Cindy Hamilton

=============

We have deadlocks

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Ophelia wrote:
>
> =============
>
> We have deadlocks

They only repel the zombies/the undead.
Normal thieves (the good ones) can pick a deadlock quickly.

:-D

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 6:18:50 PM UTC-4, wrote:
>
> > Most people have dead bolts, doesn't work on them.
>
> But there are other ways to break (many) deadbolts:
>
> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping>

You won't get into my front door when I'm home.
It's a steel door ant frame with:

- a cheap door knob lock that you
can wiggle open from the outside.

- Then I have a deadbolt that could be picked, I suppose.

- Once inside, I have a chain lock. Lol and totally worthless

- Once inside I have a slide bolt. No key. No one
gets in here without bashing the hell out of a steel
door and frame.

That could backfire on me though if I have to call 911 and can't get to
the front door to unlock it.

Help, I've fallen and I can't get up.

"Gary" wrote in message ...

Ophelia wrote:
>
> =============
>
> We have deadlocks

They only repel the zombies/the undead.
Normal thieves (the good ones) can pick a deadlock quickly.

:-D

============

lol if he can do it without our dog hearing)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk