http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...107003452.html

On 10/9/2016 10:50 AM, Janet B wrote:
>
> http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...107003452.html
>
Thanks for posting this. I have been hoping to see news of Jill and
Buffy. The only thing I have seen on news reports concerning Pawleys
Island is a report that cell phone service is out/off. I hope we will
see some good news.

MaryL

On 10/9/2016 5:32 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 10/9/2016 8:50 AM, Janet B wrote:
>>
>> http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...107003452.html
>>
>
> This is a more relevant site:
> http://www.dataw.com/default.aspx?p=...&itemID=308300
>
>
> look at the pictures - anyone know her address?

I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of publishing the
site for those of us who have been worried for days now. I don't see
a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't want to be too quickly
optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note or a phone call.

nancy

Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 10/9/2016 5:32 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> > On 10/9/2016 8:50 AM, Janet B wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...rticle10700345
> > > 2.html
> > >
> >
> > This is a more relevant site:
> > http://www.dataw.com/default.aspx?p=...view=0&plugid=
> > 1071412&ssid=282280&qfilter=RSC20678&itemID=308300
> >
> >
> > look at the pictures - anyone know her address?
>
> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of publishing
> the site for those of us who have been worried for days now. I don't
> see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't want to be too quickly
> optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note or a phone call.
>
> nancy

Agreed Nancy. I suspect she is fine, just without power and cable
right now likely. Based on the pictures, a lot of trees fell but
generally the houses maintained structural integrity it looks like?

Just like I don't see Gary posting, but i suspect he's without cable or
power, but otherwise fine.

--

On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 10/9/2016 5:32 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>> On 10/9/2016 8:50 AM, Janet B wrote:
>>>
>>> http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...107003452.html
>>>
>>
>> This is a more relevant site:
>> http://www.dataw.com/default.aspx?p=...&itemID=308300
>>
>>
>> look at the pictures - anyone know her address?
>
>I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of publishing the
>site for those of us who have been worried for days now. I don't see
>a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't want to be too quickly
>optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note or a phone call.
>
>nancy

She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless phone
so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very long before
the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a wide area
there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
try phoning her.

On 2016-10-10, Brooklyn1 > wrote:

> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
> try phoning her.

I called, yesterday, at about 1:00pm mountain time and got a busy signal.

nb

notbob wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
>> try phoning her.
>
>I called, yesterday, at about 1:00pm mountain time and got a busy signal.

Then you know she has phone service and she's alive.

On 10/10/2016 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> notbob wrote:
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
>>> try phoning her.
>>
>> I called, yesterday, at about 1:00pm mountain time and got a busy signal.
>
> Then you know she has phone service and she's alive.
>
Phones will sometimes sound like they give a busy signal even when there
actually is no power.

MaryL

On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:

>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of publishing the
>> site for those of us who have been worried for days now. I don't see
>> a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't want to be too quickly
>> optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note or a phone call.

> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless phone
> so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very long before
> the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a wide area
> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
> try phoning her.

I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
went.

nancy

Brooklyn1 wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
> > On 10/9/2016 5:32 PM, Taxed and Spent wrote:
> >> On 10/9/2016 8:50 AM, Janet B wrote:
> > > >
> >>>
> http://www.islandpacket.com/news/wea...le107003452.ht
> ml
> > > >
> > >
> >> This is a more relevant site:
> >>
> http://www.dataw.com/default.aspx?p=...ew=0&plugid=10
> 71412&ssid=282280&qfilter=RSC20678&itemID=308300
> > >
> > >
> >> look at the pictures - anyone know her address?
> >
> > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of publishing
> > the site for those of us who have been worried for days now. I
> > don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't want to be too
> > quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note or a phone call.
> >
> > nancy
>
> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless phone
> so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very long before
> the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a wide area
> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
> try phoning her.

I dont have her number. I am sure however, she is fine.

--

On 10/10/2016 10:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> notbob wrote:
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
>>> try phoning her.
>>
>> I called, yesterday, at about 1:00pm mountain time and got a busy signal.
>
> Then you know she has phone service and she's alive.
>
Or that the island and surrounds have no phone service.

nancy

Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
> > > or a phone call.
>
> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
> > could always try phoning her.
>
> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> went.
>
> nancy

Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.

Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.

I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
area, hard hit.

--

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:40:55 -0500, MaryL
> wrote:

>On 10/10/2016 9:23 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> notbob wrote:
>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you could always
>>>> try phoning her.
>>>
>>> I called, yesterday, at about 1:00pm mountain time and got a busy signal.
>>
>> Then you know she has phone service and she's alive.
>>
>Phones will sometimes sound like they give a busy signal even when there
>actually is no power.
>
>MaryL

correct

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
snip
>
>Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
snip

why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
picking at it.
Janet US

"Janet B" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> snip
>>
>>Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>>just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>>sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
> snip
>
> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
> picking at it.
> Janet US

Really, and certainly no animosity to anyone during RL times like this, the
post makes no sense at all to me.

Cheri

Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> snip
> >
> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> > power.
> snip
>
> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
> picking at it.
> Janet US

You are replying with truncation to this:

Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
>
> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
> > > or a phone call.
>
> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
> > could always try phoning her.
>
> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> went.
>
> nancy

Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.

Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.

I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
area, hard hit.

--- No stirring, others were making comments

--

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> snip
>> >
>> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>> > power.
>> snip
>>
>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>> picking at it.
>> Janet US
>
>You are replying with truncation to this:
>
>Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>> > > or a phone call.
>>
>> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>> > could always try phoning her.
>>
>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>> went.
>>
>> nancy
>
>Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>
>Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
>to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
>should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
>to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>
>I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
>should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
>Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
>area, hard hit.
>
>--- No stirring, others were making comments

It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
This series of posts was about Jill only.
If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
started one for yourself.
Janet US

Sqwertz wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Sun, 09 Oct 2016 22:48:03 -0500, cshenk wrote:
>
> > Just like I don't see Gary posting, but i suspect he's without
> > cable or power, but otherwise fine.
>
> I think Gary lives on the bottom floor. And at his complex, IIRC, the
> ground floor is partly below ground level. So if there was any
> flooding in his neighborhood then he probably got wet.
>
> -sw

That could be. In a very general direction, he's around Great Neck to
R-58 but may be seawards of that. (Even if i had his exact address, I
would not post it). His store choices indicate Laskin road as a
possible and North of VB BLVD (58).

Hard hit area for power outages. We are now down to only 125,000
without power in VB. Bet he's one of them.

--

Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote: >> snip
> >> >
> >> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> >> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> >> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> >> > power.
> >> snip
> >>
> >> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for
> you >> picking at it.
> >> Janet US
> >
> > You are replying with truncation to this:
> >
> > Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> >> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> >> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I
> don't >> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait
> a note >> > > or a phone call.
> >>
> >> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> >> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> >> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out
> over a >> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of
> course you >> > could always try phoning her.
> >>
> >> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> >> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> >> went.
> >>
> >> nancy
> >
> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> > power.
> >
> > Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not
> > called to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to
> > know some should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if
> > you can get to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
> >
> > I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number
> > (nor should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power
> > still. Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power
> > still. His area, hard hit.
> >
> > --- No stirring, others were making comments
>
> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> started one for yourself.
> Janet US

Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
adversity

--

"cshenk" wrote in message
...

Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote: >> snip
> >> >
> >> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> >> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> >> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> >> > power.
> >> snip
> >>
> >> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for
> you >> picking at it.
> >> Janet US
> >
> > You are replying with truncation to this:
> >
> > Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> >> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> >> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I
> don't >> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait
> a note >> > > or a phone call.
> >>
> >> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> >> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> >> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out
> over a >> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of
> course you >> > could always try phoning her.
> >>
> >> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> >> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> >> went.
> >>
> >> nancy
> >
> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> > power.
> >
> > Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not
> > called to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to
> > know some should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if
> > you can get to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
> >
> > I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number
> > (nor should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power
> > still. Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power
> > still. His area, hard hit.
> >
> > --- No stirring, others were making comments
>
> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> started one for yourself.
> Janet US

Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
adversity

==========

lol

--

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> snip
>>>
>>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>>> and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>>> While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>>> power.
>> snip
>>
>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>> picking at it.
>> Janet US
>
> You are replying with truncation to this:
>
> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>>> > wrote:
>>
>>>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>>>> publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>>>> days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>>>> want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>>>> or a phone call.
>>
>>> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>>> phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>>> long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>>> wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>>> could always try phoning her.
>>
>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>> went.
>>
>> nancy
>
> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
> just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
> sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>
> Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
> to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
> should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
> to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>
> I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
> should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
> Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
> area, hard hit.
>
> --- No stirring, others were making comments
>

I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.

Now I'll be thinking of Gary, too. I don't know why I thought he'd
posted since Matthew.

nancy

On 10/10/2016 1:50 PM, Nancy Young wrote:
> On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>>>> and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>>>> While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>>>> power.
>>> snip
>>>
>>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>>> picking at it.
>>> Janet US
>>
>> You are replying with truncation to this:
>>
>> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>>>>> publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>>>>> days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>>>>> want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>>>>> or a phone call.
>>>
>>>> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>>>> phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>>>> long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>>>> wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>>>> could always try phoning her.
>>>
>>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>>> went.
>>>
>>> nancy
>>
>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>> just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>> sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>>
>> Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
>> to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
>> should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
>> to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>>
>> I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
>> should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
>> Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
>> area, hard hit.
>>
>> --- No stirring, others were making comments
>>
>
> I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
> I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.
>
> Now I'll be thinking of Gary, too. I don't know why I thought he'd
> posted since Matthew.
>
> nancy


Seems we have a fight going on between someone who said let's not fight
and someone who replied let's not fight.

In article >, Nancy Young says...
>
> On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:

> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
and
> > just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
> > sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
> >
> > Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
> > to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
> > should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
> > to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
> >
> > I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
> > should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
> > Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
> > area, hard hit.
> >
> > --- No stirring, others were making comments
> >
>
> I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
> I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.

I think there's animosity about the question whether it was wrong to ask
for no animosity when there was no animosity yet. But there sure is now!

In article >, Taxed and Spent says...
>
> On 10/10/2016 1:50 PM, Nancy Young wrote:
> > On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:
> >> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >>> snip
> >>>>
> >>>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> >>>> and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> >>>> While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> >>>> power.
> >>> snip
> >>>
> >>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
> >>> picking at it.
> >>> Janet US
> >>
> >> You are replying with truncation to this:
> >>
> >> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >>
> >>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> >>>> > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> >>>>> publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> >>>>> days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
> >>>>> want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
> >>>>> or a phone call.
> >>>
> >>>> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> >>>> phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> >>>> long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
> >>>> wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
> >>>> could always try phoning her.
> >>>
> >>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> >>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> >>> went.
> >>>
> >>> nancy
> >>
> >> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
> >> just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
> >> sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
> >>
> >> Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
> >> to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
> >> should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
> >> to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
> >>
> >> I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
> >> should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
> >> Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
> >> area, hard hit.
> >>
> >> --- No stirring, others were making comments
> >>
> >
> > I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
> > I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.
> >
> > Now I'll be thinking of Gary, too. I don't know why I thought he'd
> > posted since Matthew.
> >
> > nancy
>
>
> Seems we have a fight going on between someone who said let's not fight
> and someone who replied let's not fight.

You'd think mediation would be successful

Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >>On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" >
> wrote:
> > > snip
> > > >
> > > > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity
> > > > aside, and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of
> > > > contact. While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to
> > > > be without power.
> > > snip
> > >
> > > why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for
> > > you picking at it.
> > > Janet US
> >
> > You are replying with truncation to this:
> >
> > Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
> > > > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
> > > > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I
> > > > > don't want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I
> > > > > wait a note or a phone call.
> > >
> > > > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
> > > > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
> > > > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out
> > > > over a wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of
> > > > course you could always try phoning her.
> > >
> > > I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
> > > that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
> > > went.
> > >
> > > nancy
> >
> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
> > power.
> >
> > Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not
> > called to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to
> > know some should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if
> > you can get to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
> >
> > I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number
> > (nor should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power
> > still. Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power
> > still. His area, hard hit.
> >
> > --- No stirring, others were making comments
> >
>
> I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
> I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.
>
> Now I'll be thinking of Gary, too. I don't know why I thought he'd
> posted since Matthew.
>
> nancy

Nothing you said Nancy. Others truncated all comments on how Gary is
also missing. I objected and some got mad because I objected to
removing him from the posts on folks we should be worried about.

Tracking, 50% of my city has power again. Gary probably is not one of
the lucky ones. Jill probably isnt either (though well south of me).
Last track at noon, where I think Gary lives, might be as high as 1 in
5 roads you cant get out from other than foot.

Happened to me in 1999 or so. We neighbors gutted a tree across the
road to get out. The city later got mad as the crew was supposed to
remove the wood. We told them 'what crew'. The crew never arrived so
we had cut ourselves out 3 days later. It was 5 days before they got
to us. Another week before we got power.

Dunno how long Dataw will take. I wish Jill well. I wish Gary well as
well.

--

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> snip
>> >
>> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>> > power.
>> snip
>>
>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>> picking at it.
>> Janet US
>
>You are replying with truncation to this:
>
>Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>> > > or a phone call.
>>
>> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>> > could always try phoning her.
>>
>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>> went.
>>
>> nancy
>
>Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>
>Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
>to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
>should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
>to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>
>I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
>should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
>Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
>area, hard hit.
>
>--- No stirring, others were making comments

I believe Janet was pointing out that there may have been comments but
there had been no nasty comments whatsoever, hence your " people put
their animosity aside" comment was gratuitous.

On 10/10/2016 2:27 PM, wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>>>> and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>>>> While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>>>> power.
>>> snip
>>>
>>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>>> picking at it.
>>> Janet US
>>
>> You are replying with truncation to this:
>>
>> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>>>>> publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>>>>> days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>>>>> want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>>>>> or a phone call.
>>>
>>>> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>>>> phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>>>> long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>>>> wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>>>> could always try phoning her.
>>>
>>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>>> went.
>>>
>>> nancy
>>
>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>> just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>> sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>>
>> Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
>> to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
>> should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
>> to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>>
>> I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
>> should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
>> Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
>> area, hard hit.
>>
>> --- No stirring, others were making comments
>
> I believe Janet was pointing out that there may have been comments but
> there had been no nasty comments whatsoever, hence your " people put
> their animosity aside" comment was gratuitous.
>


which means it could simply been left without responding.

cshenk wrote:
>

> Dunno how long Dataw will take. I wish Jill well. I wish Gary well as
> well.
>

I'll bet Jill wishes she had a generator. Nothing much more boring than
living without electricity for an extended period. sheez! Hopefully
boredom is her only problem.

Anyway, I'm back and fine. No electricity was no fun. No personal damage
for me though it is a mess everywhere around the beach. With that storm
turning way before it got here, I didn't see all this mess coming. Oh
well.

:-D

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 17:47:47 -0400, Gary > wrote:

>cshenk wrote:
>>
>
>> Dunno how long Dataw will take. I wish Jill well. I wish Gary well as
>> well.
>>
>
>I'll bet Jill wishes she had a generator. Nothing much more boring than
>living without electricity for an extended period. sheez! Hopefully
>boredom is her only problem.
>
>Anyway, I'm back and fine. No electricity was no fun. No personal damage
>for me though it is a mess everywhere around the beach. With that storm
>turning way before it got here, I didn't see all this mess coming. Oh
>well.
>
> :-D

Good to know you're okay

On 10/10/2016 5:47 PM, Gary wrote:

> I'll bet Jill wishes she had a generator. Nothing much more boring than
> living without electricity for an extended period. sheez! Hopefully
> boredom is her only problem.

Hey! You're back. I'm glad it was only a short time with no power
and sounds like you weren't flooded out.

nancy

On 2016-10-10 5:16 PM, cshenk wrote:

> Nothing you said Nancy. Others truncated all comments on how Gary is
> also missing. I objected and some got mad because I objected to
> removing him from the posts on folks we should be worried about.
>
> Tracking, 50% of my city has power again. Gary probably is not one of
> the lucky ones. Jill probably isnt either (though well south of me).
> Last track at noon, where I think Gary lives, might be as high as 1 in
> 5 roads you cant get out from other than foot.
>
> Happened to me in 1999 or so. We neighbors gutted a tree across the
> road to get out. The city later got mad as the crew was supposed to
> remove the wood. We told them 'what crew'. The crew never arrived so
> we had cut ourselves out 3 days later. It was 5 days before they got
> to us. Another week before we got power.
>
> Dunno how long Dataw will take. I wish Jill well. I wish Gary well as
> well.

I wish her well too. I hate to see anyone in such a difficult situation.
That being said, I imagine when there are extreme circumstances, the
authorities have to establish a set of priorities. She lives in a small
community on an island and I suspect that efforts will be made to
benefit the largest numbers of people before they get to the smaller and
more remote neighbourhoods.

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 14:47:09 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> > Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" >
>> wrote: >> snip
>> >> >
>> >> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>> >> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>> >> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>> >> > power.
>> >> snip
>> >>
>> >> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for
>> you >> picking at it.
>> >> Janet US
>> >
>> > You are replying with truncation to this:
>> >
>> > Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > > I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>> >> > > publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>> >> > > days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I
>> don't >> > > want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait
>> a note >> > > or a phone call.
>> >>
>> >> > She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>> >> > phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>> >> > long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out
>> over a >> > wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of
>> course you >> > could always try phoning her.
>> >>
>> >> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>> >> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>> >> went.
>> >>
>> >> nancy
>> >
>> > Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>> > and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>> > While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>> > power.
>> >
>> > Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not
>> > called to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to
>> > know some should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if
>> > you can get to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>> >
>> > I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number
>> > (nor should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power
>> > still. Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power
>> > still. His area, hard hit.
>> >
>> > --- No stirring, others were making comments
>>
>> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
>> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
>> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
>> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
>> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
>> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
>> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
>> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
>> This series of posts was about Jill only.
>> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
>> started one for yourself.
>> Janet US
>
>Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
>adversity

But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
people. That's called stirring.
Janet US

On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 16:50:57 -0400, Nancy Young
> wrote:

>On 10/10/2016 3:47 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 12:05:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside,
>>>> and just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact.
>>>> While I am sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without
>>>> power.
>>> snip
>>>
>>> why are you stirring? At this time I see no animosity except for you
>>> picking at it.
>>> Janet US
>>
>> You are replying with truncation to this:
>>
>> Nancy Young wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 10/10/2016 10:00 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 23:32:11 -0400, Nancy Young
>>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>>> I don't see her house in those photos, I was thinking of
>>>>> publishing the site for those of us who have been worried for
>>>>> days now. I don't see a sign of the flooding I feared. I don't
>>>>> want to be too quickly optimistic, but cautiously I wait a note
>>>>> or a phone call.
>>>
>>>> She doesn't have a cell phone, just a land line with a cordless
>>>> phone so with no power she probably can't use her cordless very
>>>> long before the battery in the handset dies. With power out over a
>>>> wide area there'd be no land line service anyway. Of course you
>>>> could always try phoning her.
>>>
>>> I don't mean to imply that I expect her to call momentarily, just
>>> that I will not be totally relieved until I hear from her how it
>>> went.
>>>
>>> nancy
>>
>> Agreed and i hope at this time, people put their animosity aside, and
>> just recall we have 2 known regular posters out of contact. While I am
>> sure both are ok, Jill and Gary are apt to be without power.
>>
>> Jill may or may not have evacuated (not clear) and Gary was not called
>> to evacuate because it was too late in Virginia Beach to know some
>> should, before you couldnt get out. The call here was 'if you can get
>> to high ground, do so or stay home and be careful'.
>>
>> I don't have Gary's exact address (nor should I) or phone number (nor
>> should I) but his general area has up to 50,000 with no power still.
>> Last check, we are at just under 200,000 without power still. His
>> area, hard hit.
>>
>> --- No stirring, others were making comments
>>
>
>I'm confused. Was the animosity comment in reaction to something
>I said? I haven't seen anything but concern for how Jill fared.
>
>Now I'll be thinking of Gary, too. I don't know why I thought he'd
>posted since Matthew.
>
>nancy

You're fine, Nancy. The preacher stepped in where one wasn't needed.
Janet US

In article >, Janet B says...
>
> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> >> started one for yourself.
> >> Janet US
> >
> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
> >adversity
>
> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
> people. That's called stirring.

You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, Janet B says...
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>>
>> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >
>> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
>> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
>> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
>> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
>> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
>> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
>> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
>> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
>> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
>> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
>> >> started one for yourself.
>> >> Janet US
>> >
>> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
>> >adversity
>>
>> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
>> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
>> people. That's called stirring.
>
>You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
>thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.

Which is exactly what you just did.

In article >, Jeßus says...
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, Janet B says...
> >>
> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >>
> >> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >
> >> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> >> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> >> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> >> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> >> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> >> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> >> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> >> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> >> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> >> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> >> >> started one for yourself.
> >> >> Janet US
> >> >
> >> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
> >> >adversity
> >>
> >> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
> >> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
> >> people. That's called stirring.
> >
> >You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
> >thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.
>
> Which is exactly what you just did.

But I don't deny it

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:26:46 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, Jeßus says...
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article >, Janet B says...
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >
>> >> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
>> >> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
>> >> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
>> >> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
>> >> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
>> >> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
>> >> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
>> >> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
>> >> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
>> >> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
>> >> >> started one for yourself.
>> >> >> Janet US
>> >> >
>> >> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
>> >> >adversity
>> >>
>> >> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
>> >> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
>> >> people. That's called stirring.
>> >
>> >You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
>> >thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.
>>
>> Which is exactly what you just did.
>
>But I don't deny it

Excellent. I award you a TVP sausage as a reward.

In article >, Jeßus says...
>
> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:26:46 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >, Jeßus says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >In article >, Janet B says...
> >> >>
> >> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
> >> >> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
> >> >> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
> >> >> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
> >> >> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
> >> >> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
> >> >> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
> >> >> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
> >> >> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
> >> >> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
> >> >> >> started one for yourself.
> >> >> >> Janet US
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
> >> >> >adversity
> >> >>
> >> >> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
> >> >> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
> >> >> people. That's called stirring.
> >> >
> >> >You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
> >> >thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.
> >>
> >> Which is exactly what you just did.
> >
> >But I don't deny it
>
> Excellent. I award you a TVP sausage as a reward.

Thanks. I had to look that up. It doesn't seem all that bad. Meat eaters
eat it a lot, because it's often used as a meat extender.

On 10/10/2016 5:47 PM, Gary wrote:

>
> Anyway, I'm back and fine. No electricity was no fun. No personal damage
> for me though it is a mess everywhere around the beach. With that storm
> turning way before it got here, I didn't see all this mess coming. Oh
> well.
>
> :-D
>

You spoiled all the fun of speculation. Had you waited a couple of days
to return the denizens of RFC would have had you washed out to sea or
hanging in a tree waiting for the flood to recede.

Glad you had no loss though.

On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:40:54 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >, Jeßus says...
>>
>> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:26:46 +1100, Bruce >
>> wrote:
>>
>> >In article >, Jeßus says...
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, 11 Oct 2016 10:19:04 +1100, Bruce >
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >In article >, Janet B says...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:36:21 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >Janet B wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> It's called clipping for clarity. I was responding to a specific
>> >> >> >> remark of yours (not Nancy Young's) that I identified. You were
>> >> >> >> responding to Nancy who said nothing to generate your comment. You
>> >> >> >> said " I hope at this time, people put their animosity aside," There
>> >> >> >> was no need for such a remark as no one had said anything untoward --
>> >> >> >> except you. Others were making comments, yes. But nothing that even
>> >> >> >> hinted at bad feelings. We were all commenting on conditions in
>> >> >> >> Jill's area out of concern. We all knew that she had not evacuated.
>> >> >> >> This series of posts was about Jill only.
>> >> >> >> If you want to start a post about Gary, do so. I see you've already
>> >> >> >> started one for yourself.
>> >> >> >> Janet US
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Janet, go stuff yourself if no one can comment on another also in
>> >> >> >adversity
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But you just couldn't comment on someone's adversity, could you? You
>> >> >> had to preach to everyone not to have animosity towards specific
>> >> >> people. That's called stirring.
>> >> >
>> >> >You're doing the stirring, you know. You could have let that little
>> >> >thing go, but you saw your chance and went for it.
>> >>
>> >> Which is exactly what you just did.
>> >
>> >But I don't deny it
>>
>> Excellent. I award you a TVP sausage as a reward.
>
>Thanks. I had to look that up. It doesn't seem all that bad.

I have horrible memories of them when I went through my vegetarian
phase at age 18. Trust me, you don't want to try one!


>Meat eaters eat it a lot, because it's often used as a meat extender.

I sure don't eat it at all.