Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2016-11-07, l not -l > wrote:
> > On 7-Nov-2016, wrote: > >> I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > The only Spam light I want is this one: > http://creepbay.com/spam-night-light...hank-you-spam/ I want one! Jes happen to have a couple o' working night-light bodies and a can o' Spam. I know what I'll be doing tomorrow night. ![]() nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ... >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll fry some spam lite tomorrow and wed and have corn with it.
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
coltwv wrote:
> >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. I tried Spam lite, I tried all the Spam flavors, they all SUCK big time, only Spam original is good. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > coltwv wrote: >> >>I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > > I tried Spam lite, I tried all the Spam flavors, they all SUCK big > time, only Spam original is good. Actually, I like original Spam the best, but Spam Lite fried with an egg on top is very good. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Cheri" wrote in message ...
> wrote in message ... >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories. Cheri ================== I was in a cut price store yesterday and there on the shelf was Spam. 99p per tin, or pack of 2 tins for £1.99 <g> -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >, Ophelia says...
> > "Cheri" wrote in message ... > > > > wrote in message > ... > >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > > I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along > with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories. > > Cheri > > ================== > > I was in a cut price store yesterday and there on the shelf was Spam. 99p > per tin, or pack of 2 tins for £1.99 <g> So, being smart, you bought two single tins at £1.98 total. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bruce" wrote in message
T... In article >, Ophelia says... > > "Cheri" wrote in message ... > > > > wrote in message > ... > >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > > I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along > with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories. > > Cheri > > ================== > > I was in a cut price store yesterday and there on the shelf was Spam. 99p > per tin, or pack of 2 tins for £1.99 <g> So, being smart, you bought two single tins at £1.98 total. ============= lol no I didn't buy any ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:46:16 -0800, "Cheri" >
wrote: > >"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message .. . >> coltwv wrote: >>> >>>I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. >> >> I tried Spam lite, I tried all the Spam flavors, they all SUCK big >> time, only Spam original is good. > >Actually, I like original Spam the best, but Spam Lite fried with an egg on >top is very good. > >Cheri It's edible but the texture is all wrong... if eaten with eggs there's nothing "Lite" about it. Only thing is it's becoming increasingly more difficult to find original Spam, probably people are buying them up. I buy Spam at BJs, they sell it in 3-packs, costs almost half the price of ordinary markets. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brooklyn1" wrote in message
... On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:46:16 -0800, "Cheri" > wrote: > >"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message .. . >> coltwv wrote: >>> >>>I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. >> >> I tried Spam lite, I tried all the Spam flavors, they all SUCK big >> time, only Spam original is good. > >Actually, I like original Spam the best, but Spam Lite fried with an egg on >top is very good. > >Cheri It's edible but the texture is all wrong... if eaten with eggs there's nothing "Lite" about it. Only thing is it's becoming increasingly more difficult to find original Spam, probably people are buying them up. I buy Spam at BJs, they sell it in 3-packs, costs almost half the price of ordinary markets. ============== I don't often see anything other than original Span. -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> "Cheri" wrote in message ... > > > > wrote in message > ... > >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > > I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along > with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories.. > > Cheri > > ================== > > I was in a cut price store yesterday and there on the shelf was Spam. 99p > per tin, or pack of 2 tins for £1.99 <g> If your statement was posited as a maths problem I'm practically sure that many younger people could not figure the correct "answer", lol... -- Best Greg |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message ... > On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 20:46:16 -0800, "Cheri" > > wrote: > >> >>"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message . .. >>> coltwv wrote: >>>> >>>>I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. >>> >>> I tried Spam lite, I tried all the Spam flavors, they all SUCK big >>> time, only Spam original is good. >> >>Actually, I like original Spam the best, but Spam Lite fried with an egg >>on >>top is very good. >> >>Cheri > > It's edible but the texture is all wrong... if eaten with eggs there's > nothing "Lite" about it. Only thing is it's becoming increasingly > more difficult to find original Spam, probably people are buying them > up. I buy Spam at BJs, they sell it in 3-packs, costs almost half the > price of ordinary markets. The regular slice is 180 calories, the Lite is 130 calories, with one egg it makes it 200 calories total, so there is a lot lite about it calorie wise, and also low carb. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"The Greatest!" wrote in message
... Ophelia wrote: > "Cheri" wrote in message ... > > > > wrote in message > ... > >I fried some for a sandwich and it was fine, 50% less fat too. > > I buy the single slice Spam Lite at Walmart for .99 I like to fry it along > with an egg and then put the egg on top, tasty breakfast for 200 calories. > > Cheri > > ================== > > I was in a cut price store yesterday and there on the shelf was Spam. 99p > per tin, or pack of 2 tins for £1.99 <g> If your statement was posited as a maths problem I'm practically sure that many younger people could not figure the correct "answer", lol... Best Greg ================ ROFL surely not ![]() -- http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spam Felony Conviction Upheld: No Free Speech To Spam | General Cooking | |||
Spam, spam, spam, spam, spam, baked beans, and spam. | General Cooking | |||
Bisquick Lite | General Cooking |