On 11/10/2016 5:47 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
>>
>> N.
>>
>
> No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.

Shush, they hate reality.

Liberal disease.

On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
>>
>> N.
>>
>
>No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.

Come on, he knew lol What about Trump? Isn't he up in class lawsuit
for not paying small contractors, due to be heard in November ????

On 11/10/2016 10:00 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
>>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
>>>
>>> N.
>>>
>>
>> No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.
>
> Come on, he knew lol

Proof? Just your opinion unless you have it. Conjecture does not hold
up in court.



> What about Trump? Isn't he up in class lawsuit
> for not paying small contractors, due to be heard in November ????
>

not sure about that one.. his lawyers may settle just to make it go away.

Christie apparently escaped indictment for Bridgegate, but still could be impeached
(unlikely), charged with a criminal charge (also unlikely) or disbarred (because of
ethics misbehavior) which doesn't need the same burden of proof as the other possible
actions against him, according to the legal experts. In any case, however, he is
tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
choose others for senior positions in his administration, like AG. According to CNN, he
can fill as many as 4000 Cabinet positions, including all the lesser ones.

N.

On 11/10/2016 8:00 PM, wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
>>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
>>>
>>> N.
>>>
>>
>> No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.
>
> Come on, he knew lol What about Trump? Isn't he up in class lawsuit
> for not paying small contractors, due to be heard in November ????
>


Simmer in your bilious recriminations, you hateful old SHREW!

On 11/11/2016 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> In any case, however, he is
> tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
> choose others for senior positions in his administration


Bugger off you libitarded hate factory, you now have NO say in what happens!

Suck on that, BIOTCH!

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 11:35:05 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/10/2016 8:00 PM, wrote:
> > On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
> >
> >> On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> >>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
> >>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
> >>>
> >>> N.
> >>>
> >>
> >> No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.
> >
> > Come on, he knew lol What about Trump? Isn't he up in class lawsuit
> > for not paying small contractors, due to be heard in November ????
> >
>
>
> Simmer in your bilious recriminations, you hateful old SHREW!

To our resident TROLL.

Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
=====

On 11/12/2016 1:56 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 11:35:05 AM UTC-7, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/10/2016 8:00 PM, wrote:
>>> On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 19:47:50 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 11/10/2016 9:19 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>>> Chris Christie? Isn't he under an indictment for Bridgegate? Sure, a
>>>>> great AG, as he could experience both sides of the law.
>>>>>
>>>>> N.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No. Some of his people were. No proof he knew about it.
>>>
>>> Come on, he knew lol What about Trump? Isn't he up in class lawsuit
>>> for not paying small contractors, due to be heard in November ????
>>>
>>
>>
>> Simmer in your bilious recriminations, you hateful old SHREW!
>
> To our resident TROLL.
>
> Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get
> out of the asylum this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
> =====
>

Roy boy!

BLOW ME!

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:36:30 -0700, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On 11/11/2016 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>> In any case, however, he is
>> tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
>> choose others for senior positions in his administration
>
>
>Bugger off you libitarded hate factory, you now have NO say in what happens!
>
>Suck on that, BIOTCH!

Apparently Trump agrees with Nancy2. Trump just kicked Christie to
the curb.
Janet US

On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:25:31 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:36:30 -0700, Sqwertz >
>wrote:
>
>>On 11/11/2016 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> In any case, however, he is
>>> tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
>>> choose others for senior positions in his administration
>>
>>
>>Bugger off you libitarded hate factory, you now have NO say in what happens!
>>
>>Suck on that, BIOTCH!
>
>Apparently Trump agrees with Nancy2. Trump just kicked Christie to
>the curb.
>Janet US

Every time I see Janet US I think USS Janet B... that's what us old
salts do.

Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
> > wrote:
> > > everyone glued to the TV or something?
> >
> > It's a truly historic moment!
> >
>
> The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
> supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.

True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.

I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
(paid the same or more than the men) and that speaks louder than any
'yellow journalizm' from the Clinton camp.

I awoke to find I was not alone.

--

On 11/12/2016 8:36 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
>>> wrote:
>>>> everyone glued to the TV or something?
>>>
>>> It's a truly historic moment!
>>>
>>
>> The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
>> supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
>
> True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
> daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
>
> I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
> him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
> secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
> (paid the same or more than the men) and that speaks louder than any
> 'yellow journalizm' from the Clinton camp.
>
> I awoke to find I was not alone.
>
This evening on the news it was reported that a commentator, who
predicted Trump's win, reckons that within 2 years, Congress will try
and impeach him so that Pence can move in to the WH as he reflects their
opinions more than DT.
Pence appears to be a nasty piece of work.

In article >, cshenk
says...
>
> Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
> > On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
> > > wrote:
> > > > everyone glued to the TV or something?
> > >
> > > It's a truly historic moment!
> > >
> >
> > The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
> > supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
>
> True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
> daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
>
> I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
> him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
> secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
> (paid the same or more than the men)

That's just so he has some pussy to grab.

On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:49:19 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, cshenk
> says...
> >
> > Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> >
> > > On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > everyone glued to the TV or something?
> > > >
> > > > It's a truly historic moment!
> > > >
> > >
> > > The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
> > > supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
> >
> > True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
> > daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
> >
> > I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
> > him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
> > secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
> > (paid the same or more than the men)
>
> That's just so he has some pussy to grab.

So he likes cats...don't hold that against him.
====

In article >, Roy
says...
>
> On Saturday, November 12, 2016 at 9:49:19 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> > In article >, cshenk
> > says...
> > >
> > > Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
> > >
> > > > On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> > > > > On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > everyone glued to the TV or something?
> > > > >
> > > > > It's a truly historic moment!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
> > > > supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
> > >
> > > True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
> > > daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
> > >
> > > I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
> > > him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
> > > secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
> > > (paid the same or more than the men)
> >
> > That's just so he has some pussy to grab.
>
> So he likes cats...don't hold that against him.
> ====

He even has a cat:
https://politicalshop.com/wp-content...tsfortrump.jpg

On 11/12/2016 2:25 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:36:30 -0700, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> On 11/11/2016 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>> In any case, however, he is
>>> tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
>>> choose others for senior positions in his administration
>>
>>
>> Bugger off you libitarded hate factory, you now have NO say in what happens!
>>
>> Suck on that, BIOTCH!
>
> Apparently Trump agrees with Nancy2. Trump just kicked Christie to
> the curb.
> Janet US
>


Oh boo ****ing hoo!

Is he kin to you or something?

Here's a clue - in business tough calls get made all the time.

Cope.

On 11/12/2016 8:36 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>> On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
>>> wrote:
>>>> everyone glued to the TV or something?
>>>
>>> It's a truly historic moment!
>>>
>>
>> The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
>> supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
>
> True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
> daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
>
> I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
> him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
> secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
> (paid the same or more than the men) and that speaks louder than any
> 'yellow journalizm' from the Clinton camp.
>
> I awoke to find I was not alone.
>
+1!

On 11/12/2016 9:49 PM, graham wrote:
> On 11/12/2016 8:36 PM, cshenk wrote:
>> Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> everyone glued to the TV or something?
>>>>
>>>> It's a truly historic moment!
>>>>
>>>
>>> The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
>>> supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
>>
>> True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
>> daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
>>
>> I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
>> him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
>> secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
>> (paid the same or more than the men) and that speaks louder than any
>> 'yellow journalizm' from the Clinton camp.
>>
>> I awoke to find I was not alone.
>>
> This evening on the news it was reported that a commentator, who
> predicted Trump's win, reckons that within 2 years, Congress will try
> and impeach him so that Pence can move in to the WH as he reflects their
> opinions more than DT.
> Pence appears to be a nasty piece of work.

There is o nastier piece of work than a Canucklehead.

You really need to have a rebar set right through your worthless skull.

DIE YOU
*******!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On 11/12/2016 9:49 PM, Bruce wrote:
> In article >, cshenk
> says...
>>
>> Ed Pawlowski wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>>
>>> On 11/9/2016 2:01 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 at 8:10:06 PM UTC-10, tert in seattle
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> everyone glued to the TV or something?
>>>>
>>>> It's a truly historic moment!
>>>>
>>>
>>> The US citizens have given Washington the middle finger. I'm not a
>>> supporter of Trump but I;m glad Hillary is done for.
>>
>> True. I and my family cast our votes thinking it a waste of time (my
>> daughter voted for the Green candidate in fact). Anyone but Hillary.
>>
>> I do not know how Trump will pan out. He has one main thing going for
>> him. He knows how to hire people who know what they are doing. His
>> secondary thing is he has a higher than average female executive level
>> (paid the same or more than the men)
>
> That's just so he has some pussy to grab.
>

No one wants to grab you, crotch rot.

On 11/13/2016 1:31 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 14:25:31 -0700, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 12 Nov 2016 11:36:30 -0700, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/11/2016 9:53 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
>>>> In any case, however, he is
>>>> tarnished goods in the eyes of Republican Party leaders and Trump would do well to
>>>> choose others for senior positions in his administration
>>>
>>>
>>> Bugger off you libitarded hate factory, you now have NO say in what happens!
>>>
>>> Suck on that, BIOTCH!
>>
>> Apparently Trump agrees with Nancy2. Trump just kicked Christie to
>> the curb.
>> Janet US
>
> Oh goody. Our psycho pal Boner is back. The holidays are always a
> tough time for the mentally insane.

Veterans day is a "holiday", but not in the traditional sense.

> Time to fire up those killfiles again. If you don't have the
> capability to killfile it, then at least don't reply to them.
>
> -sw

**** you, woman abuser.

On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>
> To our resident TROLL.
>
> Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
> =====
>
Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.

Jill

jmcquown wrote:
>
> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
> >
> > To our resident TROLL.
> >
> > Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
> > =====
> >
> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.

Not in this case. He's using Steve's thing so if anyone wants to
killfile him, they also killfile the real Steve. Maybe the addy is
different but addy's are also easy to duplicate with the proper ng
program.

That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh

"jmcquown" > wrote in message
news
> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>>
>> To our resident TROLL.
>>
>> Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using
>> Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum
>> this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
>> =====
>>
> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>
> Jill

Or change nyms with no explanation at the time.

Cheri

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>> >
>> > To our resident TROLL.
>> >
>> > Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using
>> > Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum
>> > this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
>> > =====
>> >
>> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>
> Not in this case. He's using Steve's thing so if anyone wants to
> killfile him, they also killfile the real Steve. Maybe the addy is
> different but addy's are also easy to duplicate with the proper ng
> program.
>
> That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh

I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.

Cheri

Cheri wrote:
>
> "Gary" wrote:
> > That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh
>
> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.

You can be.

On 11/14/2016 7:05 AM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>>
>> To our resident TROLL.
>>
>> Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using
>> Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum
>> this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
>> =====
>>
> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>
> Jill
Mockery is an art form.

On 11/14/2016 10:08 AM, Gary wrote:

>> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>
> Not in this case. He's using Steve's thing so if anyone wants to
> killfile him, they also killfile the real Steve. Maybe the addy is
> different but addy's are also easy to duplicate with the proper ng
> program.
>
> That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh
>

LOLOL!!!!

On 11/14/2016 10:21 AM, Cheri wrote:
>
> "jmcquown" > wrote in message
> news
>> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>
>>> To our resident TROLL.
>>>
>>> Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using
>>> Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum
>>> this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
>>> =====
>>>
>> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>>
>> Jill
>
> Or change nyms with no explanation at the time.
>
> Cheri

Ever been to a play with 3 acts?

"Cheri" wrote in message news

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> jmcquown wrote:
>>
>> On 11/12/2016 3:56 PM, Roy wrote:
>> >
>> > To our resident TROLL.
>> >
>> > Must you be such an idiot every frickin' day?...and why are you using
>> > Squertzes handle for posting? Also, how did you get out of the asylum
>> > this time? Bribery? Tunnel?
>> > =====
>> >
>> Only cowards hide behind someone else's nickname.
>
> Not in this case. He's using Steve's thing so if anyone wants to
> killfile him, they also killfile the real Steve. Maybe the addy is
> different but addy's are also easy to duplicate with the proper ng
> program.
>
> That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh

I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.

Cheri

================

Well Ophelia is not my real name, but a nickname I've had since schooldays,
so it is hardly new! I am still commonly know by it.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Gary" wrote in message ...

Cheri wrote:
>
> "Gary" wrote:
> > That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh
>
> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.

You can be.

===========

*THWAP*

;-)

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>

>
> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>
> Cheri

Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've
been married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in
boyfriends. Must be fun to be exciting.

On 11/14/2016 4:42 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
> On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've
> been married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in
> boyfriends. Must be fun to be exciting.


'Spensive too...

"Gary" > wrote in message ...
> Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "Gary" wrote:
>> > That said, only idiots like us use our real names on usenet. heheh
>>
>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>
> You can be.

LMAO, yes I know.

Cheri

"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
> On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>
>>
>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've been
> married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends. Must
> be fun to be exciting.


Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times together
after almost 53 years, even if it "sucks to be married to me" as Gary
surmises.

Cheri

On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
...
>> On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>
>>>
>>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've been
>> married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends. Must
>> be fun to be exciting.
>
>
>Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times together
>after almost 53 years, even if it "sucks to be married to me" as Gary
>surmises.

Gary knows nothing... the most important aspect of a happy marriage is
a women with chubby boobies with thick long nipples.

In article >, Cheri says...
>
> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >>
> >
> >>
> >> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
> >>
> >> Cheri
> >
> > Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've been
> > married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends. Must
> > be fun to be exciting.
>
>
> Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times together
> after almost 53 years

You don't understand. If it's boring, you don't have any fun times. It's
just... boring.

In article >, Brooklyn1
says...
>
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> ...
> >> On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >>>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
> >>>
> >>> Cheri
> >>
> >> Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've been
> >> married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends. Must
> >> be fun to be exciting.
> >
> >
> >Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times together
> >after almost 53 years, even if it "sucks to be married to me" as Gary
> >surmises.
>
> Gary knows nothing... the most important aspect of a happy marriage is
> a women with chubby boobies with thick long nipples.

Ah, Shelly relocated to its room in Crystal Palace.

On 11/14/2016 7:44 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 18:33:55 -0800, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've been
>>> married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends. Must
>>> be fun to be exciting.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times together
>> after almost 53 years, even if it "sucks to be married to me" as Gary
>> surmises.
>
> Gary knows nothing... the most important aspect of a happy marriage is
> a women with chubby boobies with thick long nipples.
>

Were you bottle fed?

"Bruce" > wrote in message
T...
> In article >, Cheri says...
>>
>> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
>> >>
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Cheri
>> >
>> > Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've
>> > been
>> > married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends.
>> > Must
>> > be fun to be exciting.
>>
>>
>> Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times
>> together
>> after almost 53 years
>
> You don't understand. If it's boring, you don't have any fun times. It's
> just... boring.

No, you don't understand. Others would find our lifestyle boring, we don't.
Playing pick up sticks with grandchildren is boring, but it's fun...see how
that works?

Cheri

In article >, Cheri says...
>
> "Bruce" > wrote in message
> T...
> > In article >, Cheri says...
> >>
> >> "Ed Pawlowski" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On 11/14/2016 12:22 PM, Cheri wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> I've never had a problem using my real name, I must be boring as Hell.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Cheri
> >> >
> >> > Boring can be good. I have a relative that thinks I'm boring. We've
> >> > been
> >> > married 50+ years. She's had 3 husbands and two live in boyfriends.
> >> > Must
> >> > be fun to be exciting.
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes, I will take boring any day. We still have a lot of fun times
> >> together
> >> after almost 53 years
> >
> > You don't understand. If it's boring, you don't have any fun times. It's
> > just... boring.
>
> No, you don't understand. Others would find our lifestyle boring, we don't.
> Playing pick up sticks with grandchildren is boring, but it's fun...see how
> that works?

If it's fun, it's not boring. What do those others know.