On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 11:10:54 PM UTC-10, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
> In article >,
> dsi1 <dsiyahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > My guess is that you haven't noticed the rage that has been building up for
> > the last 8 years.
>
> When Romney lost, do you recall anyone slobbering their displeasure in
> the streets while wiping their snotty noses and weeping with a service
> animal? Who the hell are these people? Where did they grow up?
> Like karaoke? Try this. Wait for the lyrics. It's great for the blues.
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg&ab_channel=bagel84568>
>
> leo

You're going all over the place. If you want to vent, that's fine but what the heck does that have to do with me? Nuttin.

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 5:42:00 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 12:47 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >> You really don't put much thought into your political posts. Beaucoup
> >> emotion. Zero logic. I love your cooking posts. Keep those up!
> >>
> >> leo
> >
> > My guess is that you haven't noticed the rage that has been building up for the last 8 years. Yoose should see the view at
> > street level. It wasn't pretty.
> >
> > The trouble with yoose guys is that you think that by insulting the poster, you invalidate the idea. I calls that zero logic.
> > My reasoning and cooking is pretty much impeccable. This was written a few months ago. As usual, I was spot on.
> >
> > "The last 16 years have been just swell. We can choose to have more of
> > the same or we can opt for something a little more exciting. In the last
> > 8 years, America has seen the greatest social change since the War for
> > States Rights (as our friends down South might say.) 2017 could be the
> > year we blow everything up. Everybody says "it can't happen here" but
> > they're going to have to eat those words. "
> >
> The only thing being blown up is massive systemic corruption.
>
> About time, doncha think?

Mostly I deal with the facts. I don't see any reason to add to the hill of beans by handing out my personal preferences in these matters.

In article >,
Cindy Hamilton > wrote:

> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
> > >
> > > Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
> >
> > How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
> >
> > Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
> >
> > Cripes.
>
> If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
> is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

But a senator from New York is above all that?

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:07:30 PM UTC-5, Mark Storkamp wrote:
> In article >,
> Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > > On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
> > > >
> > > > Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on..
> > >
> > > How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
> > >
> > > Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
> > >
> > > Cripes.
> >
> > If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
> > is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
> >
> > Cindy Hamilton
>
> But a senator from New York is above all that?

Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.

Cindy Hamilton

On 11/18/2016 9:35 AM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 11:10:54 PM UTC-10, Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>> In article >,
>> dsi1 <dsiyahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>> My guess is that you haven't noticed the rage that has been building up for
>>> the last 8 years.
>>
>> When Romney lost, do you recall anyone slobbering their displeasure in
>> the streets while wiping their snotty noses and weeping with a service
>> animal? Who the hell are these people? Where did they grow up?
>> Like karaoke? Try this. Wait for the lyrics. It's great for the blues.
>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg&ab_channel=bagel84568>
>>
>> leo
>
> You're going all over the place. If you want to vent, that's fine but what the heck does that have to do with me? Nuttin.
>
You cited "the rage".

The fact is both Obozo elections were met with nothing but peace and
decorum from the right.

On 11/18/2016 9:37 AM, dsi1 wrote:

>>> "The last 16 years have been just swell. We can choose to have more of
>>> the same or we can opt for something a little more exciting. In the last
>>> 8 years, America has seen the greatest social change since the War for
>>> States Rights (as our friends down South might say.) 2017 could be the
>>> year we blow everything up. Everybody says "it can't happen here" but
>>> they're going to have to eat those words. "
>>>
>> The only thing being blown up is massive systemic corruption.
>>
>> About time, doncha think?
>
> Mostly I deal with the facts.

That helps.

> I don't see any reason to add to the hill of beans by handing out my personal preferences in these matters.

Yet you just alluded to it.

On 11/18/2016 10:07 AM, Mark Storkamp wrote:

>>>> Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
>>>
>>> How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
>>>
>>> Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
>>>
>>> Cripes.
>>
>> If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
>> is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> But a senator from New York is above all that?
>
Foundation is clean as a ????

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:30:30 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:08:07 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/17/2016 12:36 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> He was telling his racist supporters to stop harassing minorities.
>>
>> He has no racist supporters, fool.
>
> Are you claiming that absolutely none of the millions of people
> who voted for Trump is a racist?

Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
for you).

-sw

On 11/18/2016 10:36 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:07:30 PM UTC-5, Mark Storkamp wrote:
>> In article >,
>> Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
>>>>
>>>> How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
>>>>
>>>> Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
>>>>
>>>> Cripes.
>>>
>>> If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
>>> is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> But a senator from New York is above all that?
>
> Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>
Impossible, humans are never behaviorally equal.

HRC is the single most corrupt politician in American history.

In article >,
Cindy Hamilton says...
>
> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:07:30 PM UTC-5, Mark Storkamp wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > > Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
> > > >
> > > > How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
> > > >
> > > > Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
> > > >
> > > > Cripes.
> > >
> > > If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
> > > is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
> > >
> > > Cindy Hamilton
> >
> > But a senator from New York is above all that?
>
> Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.

No, they're not. One is your usual 2-faced politician. The other one is
a ruthless narcissist that shouldn't be at the head of a supermarket let
alone a country.

Maybe the right to vote should be made dependent on some basic
education. And maybe a quick alcohol and drugs test just before voting.

In article > ,
Bruce > wrote:

> In article >,
> Cindy Hamilton says...
> >
> > On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:07:30 PM UTC-5, Mark Storkamp wrote:
> > > In article >,
> > > Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > > On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > > > Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
> > > > >
> > > > > How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
> > > > >
> > > > > Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
> > > > >
> > > > > Cripes.
> > > >
> > > > If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
> > > > is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
> > > >
> > > > Cindy Hamilton
> > >
> > > But a senator from New York is above all that?
> >
> > Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.
>
> No, they're not. One is your usual 2-faced politician. The other one is
> a ruthless narcissist that shouldn't be at the head of a supermarket let
> alone a country.
>
> Maybe the right to vote should be made dependent on some basic
> education. And maybe a quick alcohol and drugs test just before voting.

I'd agree to that. That takes California, Colorado &c. out of the
equation.

In article >,
Cindy Hamilton > wrote:

> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 12:07:30 PM UTC-5, Mark Storkamp wrote:
> > In article >,
> > Cindy Hamilton > wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:18:59 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> > > > On 11/17/2016 5:02 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > > > Even though you're an obvious troll, I have to. I just have to.
> > > > >
> > > > > Cripes. Suck it up. I voted for Clinton. She lost. Life goes on.
> > > >
> > > > How illogical to vote for the queen of corruption and graft.
> > > >
> > > > Is that the kind of governance you endorse?
> > > >
> > > > Cripes.
> > >
> > > If you think a man who has done business in New York and New Jersey
> > > is uncomfortable with graft and corruption, you really are naïve.
> > >
> > > Cindy Hamilton
> >
> > But a senator from New York is above all that?
>
> Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

It's refreshing to see honesty. There was a time, supposedly, when
people could disagree, have an honest discussion, shake hands and part
ways. Now it seems when you turn your back you get your car thrashed and
your face kicked in.

On 11/18/2016 11:08 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> But a senator from New York is above all that?
>> Oh, hell, no. They're both equally flawed, each in their own way.
>
> No, they're not. One is your usual 2-faced politician.

Ignorantly short shrift, she is the ALL TIME most corrupt American
politician ever!


> The other one is
> a ruthless narcissist that shouldn't be at the head of a supermarket let
> alone a country.

Funny thing, almost anyone who has worked for him says otherwise:


http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christi...-life-n2242514

On Sunday, Donald Trump shared a video featuring William Campudoni, a
professional boxer who worked for Trump in the 1980s. Campudoni told the
story of how he, a destitute man in his 20s who was abused as a child
and nearly homeless, was hired off the street by Trump and maintained a
close relationship with the Trump family.

Campudoni described the diverse workforce hired by Trump himself, and
said that everyone was treated as family. He then elaborated how he
looked up to Trump as a role model for raising his own family and said
that Trump led him to discover his inner worth and purpose. Campudoni
believes that Trump can change the United States, just like he changed him.

> Maybe the right to vote should be made dependent on some basic
> education. And maybe a quick alcohol and drugs test just before voting.

Auztards are fascists at heart.

Gary wrote:
>Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>Sqwertz wrote:
>> >Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> > > He was telling his racist supporters to stop harassing minorities.
>> >
>> > He has no racist supporters, fool.
>>
>> Are you claiming that absolutely none of the millions of people
>> who voted for Trump is a racist?
>
>There are plenty of racists on both sides. I work with some and they
>disgust me. You wouldn't believe some of the racist comments I've heard.


Anyone with an iota of intellect realizes that everyone is a racist to
some degree. Racism is actually an assinine discussion simply because
it's so difficult to define something so dynamic, it's really not so
black and white. Racism will be far less problematic when it becomes
acceptable/PC to admit one's racial preferences publicly, same as
admitting which flavor ice cream one prefers. I prefer vanilla ice
cream but I don't like French vanilla because of the yellow tinge and
puddinglike texture from eggs... I'll enjoy chocolate too but it's not
my first choice. I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle... generally females are more
emotionally profound, typically men are emotionally shallow... the
majority of male's emotion is no more complex than a TV remote. And
therein lies the reason why Trump won the presidency, he's
better/quicker at connecting with the palatte of human emotions than
Sir Hillary. That's what made Trump so absurdly wealthy, his uncanny
ability to recognize emotion and communicate emotionally from a
position of strength, unlike most people who when they become
emotional turn into quivering jelly.

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:30:30 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 at 5:08:07 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On 11/17/2016 12:36 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>> He was telling his racist supporters to stop harassing minorities.
> >>
> >> He has no racist supporters, fool.
> >
> > Are you claiming that absolutely none of the millions of people
> > who voted for Trump is a racist?
>
> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
> for you).
>
> -sw

Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
try to discipline myself to ignore him.

Cindy

On 11/18/2016 1:07 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
>> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
>> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
>> for you).
>>
>> -sw
>
> Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
> try to discipline myself to ignore him.
>
> Cindy
>
But first some more critters need drowning?

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 7:47:14 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/18/2016 9:37 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>
> >>> "The last 16 years have been just swell. We can choose to have more of
> >>> the same or we can opt for something a little more exciting. In the last
> >>> 8 years, America has seen the greatest social change since the War for
> >>> States Rights (as our friends down South might say.) 2017 could be the
> >>> year we blow everything up. Everybody says "it can't happen here" but
> >>> they're going to have to eat those words. "
> >>>
> >> The only thing being blown up is massive systemic corruption.
> >>
> >> About time, doncha think?
> >
> > Mostly I deal with the facts.
>
> That helps.
>
> > I don't see any reason to add to the hill of beans by handing out my personal preferences in these matters.
>
> Yet you just alluded to it.

I allude to nothing. I want to keep people in the dark as to what my politics and religion are. That's damn good policy right there! My allusion is your illusion.

In article >, gravesend10
@verizon.net says...
> I don't like any men, I
> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle.
>
Thankyou for "egotesticle", Sheldon, a novel contribution to the
English language that will always remind me of you.

Janet UK

On 11/18/2016 1:36 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 7:47:14 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/18/2016 9:37 AM, dsi1 wrote:
>>
>>>>> "The last 16 years have been just swell. We can choose to have more of
>>>>> the same or we can opt for something a little more exciting. In the last
>>>>> 8 years, America has seen the greatest social change since the War for
>>>>> States Rights (as our friends down South might say.) 2017 could be the
>>>>> year we blow everything up. Everybody says "it can't happen here" but
>>>>> they're going to have to eat those words. "
>>>>>
>>>> The only thing being blown up is massive systemic corruption.
>>>>
>>>> About time, doncha think?
>>>
>>> Mostly I deal with the facts.
>>
>> That helps.
>>
>>> I don't see any reason to add to the hill of beans by handing out my personal preferences in these matters.
>>
>> Yet you just alluded to it.
>
> I allude to nothing.

Heck, you came right out and said this is it - massive change!

> I want to keep people in the dark as to what my politics and religion
are.

I'm good with that.

> That's damn good policy right there!

Tis indeed!

> My allusion is your illusion.

That depends on how good a guesser I am.

On 11/18/2016 2:27 PM, Janet wrote:
> In article >, gravesend10
> @verizon.net says...
>> I don't like any men, I
>> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
>> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle.
>>
> Thankyou for "egotesticle", Sheldon, a novel contribution to the
> English language that will always remind me of you.
>
> Janet UK
>

Admit it, you want to ball him.

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:48 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>
>> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
>> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
>> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
>> for you).
>
> Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
> try to discipline myself to ignore him.

Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
they're that Boner dude.

-sw

On 11/18/2016 3:30 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:48 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
>> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>>
>>> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
>>> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
>>> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
>>> for you).
>>
>> Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
>> try to discipline myself to ignore him.
>
> Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
> change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
> they're that Boner dude.
>
> -sw
>

Ever apologize to poor Omelet?

On 11/18/2016 6:22 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:44:43 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
>> her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
>> that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
>> she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
>> has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
>> complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
>> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
>> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle...
>
> You're such a bullshitter. If a big, busty man came up to you and
> offered you his breasts you'd be instantly all over that

Are you HITTING on him, Fleshy One?

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:22:08 -0600, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 14:44:43 -0500, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
>> her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
>> that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
>> she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
>> has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
>> complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
>> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
>> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle...
>
>You're such a bullshitter. If a big, busty man came up to you and
>offered you his breasts you'd be instantly all over that like flies on
>shit. You wouldn't care if it was man or woman - you just admitted as
>much.
>
>And His Name is Robert Paulson.

You couldn't be more wrong, I would never be interested in any male
for any reason whatsoever. Way before I'd look at a male with GG cups
I'd choose the 90 lb female with A cups. Very often the gals with
tiny titties have the best nipples.

>ObFood: Grilled chicken breast cutlet with bacon, havarti, blue cheese
>dressing, lettuce and tomato on a toasted telera roll. With tater
>tots and habanero ketchup.

Tonight was eyetalian saw-seege with ****ghet No 8 and homemade
too-mato sauce... simple but D-Lish. Most times I make my own but
when on sale I buy this brand; Gianelli, from Syracuse, NY.
https://www.gianellisausage.com/

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Gary wrote:
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> He was telling his racist supporters to stop harassing minorities.
>>>>
>>>> He has no racist supporters, fool.
>>>
>>> Are you claiming that absolutely none of the millions of people
>>> who voted for Trump is a racist?
>>
>> There are plenty of racists on both sides. I work with some and they
>> disgust me. You wouldn't believe some of the racist comments I've heard.
>
>
> Anyone with an iota of intellect realizes that everyone is a racist to
> some degree. Racism is actually an assinine discussion simply because
> it's so difficult to define something so dynamic, it's really not so
> black and white. Racism will be far less problematic when it becomes
> acceptable/PC to admit one's racial preferences publicly, same as
> admitting which flavor ice cream one prefers. I prefer vanilla ice
> cream but I don't like French vanilla because of the yellow tinge and
> puddinglike texture from eggs... I'll enjoy chocolate too but it's not
> my first choice. I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
> her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
> that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
> she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
> has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
> complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle... generally females are more
> emotionally profound, typically men are emotionally shallow... the
> majority of male's emotion is no more complex than a TV remote. And
> therein lies the reason why Trump won the presidency, he's
> better/quicker at connecting with the palatte of human emotions than
> Sir Hillary. That's what made Trump so absurdly wealthy, his uncanny
> ability to recognize emotion and communicate emotionally from a
> position of strength, unlike most people who when they become
> emotional turn into quivering jelly.
>
Yep, as long as they are dark skinned (negro or darker),
have huge gigantic titties, with long, thick tough nipples
that will stand up to hard use on the farm, the brooklyn man
and myself want the same kind of woman. Hefty, sturdy, thick
skinned. With huge tits.

It just so happens I'm partial to dark skinned women,but your description makes me feel ill... :-[

On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:48 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> > On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
> >
> >> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
> >> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
> >> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
> >> for you).
> >
> > Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
> > try to discipline myself to ignore him.
>
> Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
> change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
> they're that Boner dude.
>
> -sw

If I can't manage to ignore him, I'll try to change the attributions so
it doesn't look like you're a great big douche.

Cindy Hamilton

On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:03:54 -0700, Sqwertz >
wrote:

>Sqwertz wrote:
>>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>
>>> I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
>>> her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
>>> that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
>>> she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
>>> has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
>>> complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
>>> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
>>> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle...
>>
>> You're such a bullshitter. If a big, busty man came up to you and
>> offered you his breasts you'd be instantly all over that
>
>Are you HITTING on him, Fleshy One?

The dwarf is just the right height for latching on, to peepee! LOL

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> Sqwertz wrote:
> > Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > > Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
> > > try to discipline myself to ignore him.
> >
> > Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
> > change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
> > they're that Boner dude.
> >
> > -sw
>
> If I can't manage to ignore him, I'll try to change the attributions so
> it doesn't look like you're a great big douche.

So... You don't think the real sw is a big douche too? lolol

On 11/19/2016 12:27 AM, Jebus Jones wrote:
> It just so happens I'm partial to dark skinned women,but your description makes me feel ill... :-[
>

But are dark skinned women partial to you, rabbit killer?

On 11/19/2016 4:42 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 5:30:43 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 12:07:48 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, November 18, 2016 at 1:01:40 PM UTC-5, Sqwertz wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please be careful who you're responding to. If it doesn't sound like
>>>> me, it's probably not. I don't think my original posts even show up
>>>> on Google (but this one will as I temporarily changed a setting just
>>>> for you).
>>>
>>> Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
>>> try to discipline myself to ignore him.
>>
>> Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
>> change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
>> they're that Boner dude.
>>
>> -sw
>
> If I can't manage to ignore him, I'll try to change the attributions so
> it doesn't look like you're a great big douche.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>

So the heartless animal torturer is now siding with the craven
woman-stalker?

Wow.

This is a pretty good alliance I think...

On 11/19/2016 5:04 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 19:03:54 -0700, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't care what race a woman is, I don't notice
>>>> her race, I only notice her breasts because in the final analysis
>>>> that's what attracts me most, if she has great boobs I don't care if
>>>> she's striped like a zebra or splotched like a giraffe so long as she
>>>> has a good complexion, regardless of race I look for a clear
>>>> complexion. I don't care what race a man is, I don't like any men, I
>>>> dislike them all equally because they are simultaneously fickle,
>>>> competitive, dishonest, and egotesticle...
>>>
>>> You're such a bullshitter. If a big, busty man came up to you and
>>> offered you his breasts you'd be instantly all over that
>>
>> Are you HITTING on him, Fleshy One?
>
> The dwarf is just the right height for latching on, to peepee! LOL
>
Reminds me of that scene in the flick "The Cowboy Way":

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109493/quotes

Sonny: Well what do you know, our friend here isn't wearing any underpants!
Chango: What's a baby cow gonna do to me?
[Sonny shrugs and pulls down Chango's pants]
Chango: Hey come on man!, what you doing?
Sonny: I am embarrassed, our friend here isn't wearing any underpants.
Pepper: [pulls a baby calf out of the barn and the calf starts snorting]
He sees it!
Sonny: Damn, that hungry devil thinks your little wee-wee is his mama's
teat.
Chango: Hey hey man, you guys can't do this.
Sonny: I'll ask you one more time asshole, where's Teresa?
Chango: I ain't telling you shit!
Sonny: It's your call stubby, let him go Pepper!.
[Pepper releases the calf and it makes its way towards Chango]
Chango: whoa!
[begins to moan as the calf begins to suck his penis]
Sonny: Damn, that looks like it hurts.

On 11/19/2016 5:57 AM, Gary wrote:
> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>
>> Sqwertz wrote:
>>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> Sorry, I was responding to the troll who's been impersonating you. I'll
>>>> try to discipline myself to ignore him.
>>>
>>> Thanks. None of my posts show in Google Groups (unless I specifically
>>> change a setting, like now), so if you see any original posts from me,
>>> they're that Boner dude.
>>>
>>> -sw
>>
>> If I can't manage to ignore him, I'll try to change the attributions so
>> it doesn't look like you're a great big douche.
>
> So... You don't think the real sw is a big douche too? lolol
>

Hey man, the animal torturer is allied with the woman stalker...that's
like...PERFECT SYMMETRY!

"cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>
> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
> politics, it was very muddled.
>
> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
> higher than average female executive component than average and they
> are paid the same.
>
> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
> sit back and watch.
>
>
>
>
Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?

--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

Leonard Blaisdell > Wrote in message:
> In article >,
> dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> My guess is that you haven't noticed the rage that has been building up for
>> the last 8 years.
>
> When Romney lost, do you recall anyone slobbering their displeasure in
> the streets while wiping their snotty noses and weeping with a service
> animal? Who the hell are these people? Where did they grow up?
> Like karaoke? Try this. Wait for the lyrics. It's great for the blues.
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg&ab_channel=bagel84568>
>
> leo
>

I think most of why we see more of what's going on out there is
the same in all cases, not just riots and elections. The
internet. Everyone records and Snapchats and Pinterest's, etc
everything that happens. Sure there was the internet 8 years ago
and even social media but the technology has improved to the
point to allow sharing everything with everyone on the planet.
And of course taking things out of context has always gone on.



--


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/

On 11/19/2016 1:14 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> "cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>
>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>
>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>> are paid the same.
>>
>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>> sit back and watch.
>>
>>
>>
>>
> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>

http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/at...an-male-video/

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:14:44 -0500 (EST), Cheryl
> wrote:

>"cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>
>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>
>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>> are paid the same.
>>
>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>> sit back and watch.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?

It would be really surprising - I see he finallly settled paying
$25million to the contractors he ripped off!

On 11/19/2016 1:59 PM, wrote:
>> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
> It would be really surprising - I see


**** off, you rancid-twawtted old Canuck whore.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:51:44 -0500 (EST), Cheryl
> wrote:

> Leonard Blaisdell > Wrote in message:
> > In article >,
> > dsi1 > wrote:
> >
> >> My guess is that you haven't noticed the rage that has been building up for
> >> the last 8 years.
> >
> > When Romney lost, do you recall anyone slobbering their displeasure in
> > the streets while wiping their snotty noses and weeping with a service
> > animal? Who the hell are these people? Where did they grow up?
> > Like karaoke? Try this. Wait for the lyrics. It's great for the blues.
> > <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg&ab_channel=bagel84568>
> >
> > leo
> >
>
> I think most of why we see more of what's going on out there is
> the same in all cases, not just riots and elections. The
> internet. Everyone records and Snapchats and Pinterest's, etc
> everything that happens. Sure there was the internet 8 years ago
> and even social media but the technology has improved to the
> point to allow sharing everything with everyone on the planet.
> And of course taking things out of context has always gone on.
>

Gullible, ill informed, voters did it and you won't win an argument
with a chatbot.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/te...?smid=fb-share


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

Well, I got my LOL for the morning with the #TrumpCup campaign...

TrumpCup: Donald Trump supporters protest against Starbucks by buying coffees
SAT NOV 19 14:18:50 EST 2016

In a move which has puzzled many online, Donald Trump supporters are protesting against Starbucks by buying drinks under the US President-elect's surname.

The protest was reportedly encouraged on Twitter after a Florida man claimed a Starbucks barista in Miami refused him service because he supported Mr Trump, according to CNN