On 11/19/2016 5:53 PM, sf wrote:

> Gullible, ill informed, voters did it and you won't win an argument
> with a chatbot.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/te...?smid=fb-share
>
>

The problem also is Clinton did not have much of a message. The ads
running here were critical of Trump but I can't recall a single one
telling me what she was going to do. Her sense of entitlement did her in.

Just a guess, if Biden had run he would have done much better than
Hillary. Too many people disliked her more than Trump.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:59:54 -0400, wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:14:44 -0500 (EST), Cheryl
> wrote:
>
>>"cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>>
>>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>>
>>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>>> are paid the same.
>>>
>>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>>> sit back and watch.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>
>It would be really surprising - I see he finallly settled paying
>$25million to the contractors he ripped off!

no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
Janet US

I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.

Denise in NH

Yes, it is different this time. Trump is not your normal president elect so I do understand the reasons for the protests.

The people he is selecting are frightening when you look into their past history. Never mind the unprecedented nepotism, not long ago he said they would be running his business interests, now they're running the country.

I'm guessing his administration will implode at some point as his views/policies (if you call them that) are impractical and contradictory. The rotw won't wear it either.

On 11/19/2016 3:53 PM, sf wrote:

>>> When Romney lost, do you recall anyone slobbering their displeasure in
>>> the streets while wiping their snotty noses and weeping with a service
>>> animal? Who the hell are these people? Where did they grow up?
>>> Like karaoke? Try this. Wait for the lyrics. It's great for the blues.
>>> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1H-Y7MAASkg&ab_channel=bagel84568>
>>>
>>> leo
>>>
>>
>> I think most of why we see more of what's going on out there is
>> the same in all cases, not just riots and elections. The
>> internet. Everyone records and Snapchats and Pinterest's, etc
>> everything that happens. Sure there was the internet 8 years ago
>> and even social media but the technology has improved to the
>> point to allow sharing everything with everyone on the planet.
>> And of course taking things out of context has always gone on.
>>
>
> Gullible, ill informed, voters did it and you won't win an argument
> with a chatbot.
> http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/te...esearchers-say.
> html?smid=fb-share
>
>

This hopeless froth after the Dems registered 3 million illegals to vote
using dead peoples' names?

Get real!

On 11/19/2016 4:26 PM, Jebus Jones wrote:
> Well, I got my LOL for the morning with the #TrumpCup campaign...

No one gives a flying ****, rabbit killer.

Tend to your own Auztarded garden, you sick puppy-eating barbarian.

On 11/19/2016 5:14 PM, wrote:
> I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3
> million votes than trump and counting,

Due to massive illegal alien vote fraud - 3 million voted using dead
peoples' names.

> they're protesting the lying scumbag who won.

Boo ****ing hoo, biotch!

> They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate.

Wow, you're ****ing insane, just like the rest of the emotionally
unstable left.

> It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him.

If you have a soul it came from a camel turd.

> The only people who will count are fat, old white men.

Dems LOVE to personally denigrate and label - especially WHITE people!

> The White House isn't grand enough for him.

It was gran enough to hide cigars in Monica though...

> He lied through his teeth through the whole election process

No he didn't.

> and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>
> Denise in NH
>
Sorry biotch, duped is Demotardia defined.

You dumb piece of SHIT!

On 11/19/2016 5:30 PM, Jebus Jones wrote:
> Trump is not your normal president elect so I do understand the reasons for the protests.

You understand NOTHING, rabbit killer.

**** off and mind your own Asss-Trailer bidnits, bitch!

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:40:10 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:59:54 -0400, wrote:
>
>>On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:14:44 -0500 (EST), Cheryl
> wrote:
>>
>>>"cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>>>
>>>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>>>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>>>
>>>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>>>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>>>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>>>> are paid the same.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>>>> sit back and watch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>>
>>It would be really surprising - I see he finallly settled paying
>>$25million to the contractors he ripped off!
>
>no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
>trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
>for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
>Janet US

Yes, I knew it was to make it go away but also there was no guilty/not
guilty side to it apparently. It does not imply admission but I also
don't believe even a wealthy man forks out $25 mill. without a very
pressing reason

On 11/19/2016 5:54 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:40:10 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:59:54 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 15:14:44 -0500 (EST), Cheryl
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> "cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>>>>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>>>>
>>>>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>>>>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>>>>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>>>>> are paid the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>>>>> sit back and watch.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>>>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>>>
>>> It would be really surprising - I see he finallly settled paying
>>> $25million to the contractors he ripped off!
>>
>> no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
>> trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
>> for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
>> Janet US
>
> Yes, I knew it was to make it go away


= made whole.

The RIGHT way.

Cope, you vicipus shrew.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:14:14 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

>I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>
>Denise in NH


I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
disappointment. It's probably the nastiest side of him, to take
advantage of them.

On 2016-11-19 7:14 PM, wrote:
> I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting
> that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes
> than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who
> won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny,
> xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already
> starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The
> only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House
> isn't grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the
> whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to
> realize they were duped.
>


I am sure it sucks, and a lot of people in the US should be embarrassed
by their election of that idiot. Look back a couple of weeks and Trump's
comments about whether or not he would accept the results of the
election and how Clinton supporters were concerned that Trump's
supporters would protest, and how wrong that would be. Here we are post
election and the Clinton's supporters are doing exactly what they
thought the Trumpeters would be so wrong to do.

On 2016-11-19 7:57 PM, wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:14:14 -0800 (PST),
> wrote:
>
>> I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>>
>> Denise in NH
>
>
> I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
> because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
> bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
> disappointment. It's probably the nastiest side of him, to take
> advantage of them.
>

I suppose we should feel sorry for them. Anyone who believed that he
would or could do that is probably too stupid to be gainfully employed.

In article >,
says...
>
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:14:14 -0800 (PST),
> wrote:
>
> >I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't
grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
> >
> >Denise in NH
>
>
> I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
> because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
> bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
> disappointment. It's probably the nastiest side of him, to take
> advantage of them.

Clinton told the "people" she was against trade agreements and wanted to
create more jobs and then she'd turn around and tell corporations she
was for trade agreements. That's why you should have been for Bernie
"Honest Man" Sanders and not for Hillary "Crooked Woman" Clinton.

On 11/19/2016 7:54 PM, wrote:

>> no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
>> trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
>> for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
>> Janet US
>
> Yes, I knew it was to make it go away but also there was no guilty/not
> guilty side to it apparently. It does not imply admission but I also
> don't believe even a wealthy man forks out $25 mill. without a very
> pressing reason
>

He wants to focus on running the country, not have to take time for
court. Probably worked out cheaper for both sides. .

On 11/19/2016 7:14 PM, wrote:
> The only people who will count are fat, old white men.

Damn, I have a bright future!

> He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>
> Denise in NH
>

What politician has not? Every one from every party.

On 11/19/2016 5:57 PM, wrote:
> I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
> because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
> bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
> disappointment.


Hitlery promised to "retrain" them, for what we may never know, LOL!

On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 10:59:27 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/19/2016 1:14 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> > "cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
> >>
> >> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
> >> politics, it was very muddled.
> >>
> >> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
> >> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
> >> higher than average female executive component than average and they
> >> are paid the same.
> >>
> >> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
> >> sit back and watch.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
> > and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
> >
>
> http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/at...an-male-video/

The good news is that you can bet the women execs are going to be real dishes - Miss Universe-class lookers. It makes me happy just thinking about it! You best believe that we got a lot to be thankful for!

On 11/19/2016 6:11 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> and a lot of people in the US should be embarrassed by their election of
> that idiot.

Oh no, that BILLIONAIRE is no "idiot" like your paper tiger Eau de
Trudeau Jr.

Empty suit, all name, spend the peoples' money down.

You canuckleheaded shitbag!

On 11/19/2016 6:14 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> I suppose we should feel sorry for them. Anyone who believed that he
> would or could do that is probably too stupid to be gainfully employed.


Like the people who believed Hitlery would "retrain" them
for_______________???????

Yeah, they waere all gonna make more solar panels, lol!

You're such a monumental moron.

On 11/19/2016 6:18 PM, Bruce wrote:
> Clinton told the "people" she was against trade agreements and wanted to
> create more jobs and then she'd turn around and tell corporations she
> was for trade agreements. That's why you should have been for Bernie
> "Honest Man" Sanders and not for Hillary "Crooked Woman" Clinton.


Old "honest man" just bought himself a nice estate with the campaign
funds he hasn't returned.

Mmm hmm.

On 11/19/2016 7:03 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 10:59:27 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
>> On 11/19/2016 1:14 PM, Cheryl wrote:
>>> "cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
>>>>
>>>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
>>>> politics, it was very muddled.
>>>>
>>>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
>>>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
>>>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
>>>> are paid the same.
>>>>
>>>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
>>>> sit back and watch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>>>
>>
>> http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/at...an-male-video/
>
> The good news is that you can bet the women execs are going to be real dishes - Miss Universe-class lookers.

It's like a higher class Hooters then?

:-)))

> It makes me happy just thinking about it! You best believe that we got a lot to be thankful for!

Ivanka or Chelsea on my TV?

Hmmm...

:-)))

On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 4:13:17 PM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
> On 11/19/2016 7:03 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 19, 2016 at 10:59:27 AM UTC-10, Sqwertz wrote:
> >> On 11/19/2016 1:14 PM, Cheryl wrote:
> >>> "cshenk" > Wrote in message:.
> >>>>
> >>>> I am going to wait and see how he does. There was so much yellow
> >>>> politics, it was very muddled.
> >>>>
> >>>> For example in reality, Trumps companies have a higher than average
> >>>> 'minority' executive component who are paid the same. He also has a
> >>>> higher than average female executive component than average and they
> >>>> are paid the same.
> >>>>
> >>>> I don't know what to expect really but it's happened and I am going to
> >>>> sit back and watch.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
> >>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
> >>>
> >>
> >> http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/at...an-male-video/
> >
> > The good news is that you can bet the women execs are going to be real dishes - Miss Universe-class lookers.
>
> It's like a higher class Hooters then?
>
> :-)))
>
> > It makes me happy just thinking about it! You best believe that we got a lot to be thankful for!
>
> Ivanka or Chelsea on my TV?
>
> Hmmm...
>
> :-)))

Is there anything more exciting that a high-paid, executive dish? Absolutely not!

https://goo.gl/images/9fcs84

On 11/19/2016 7:29 PM, dsi1 wrote:

>>>>> Where did you find the information about Trump paying minorities
>>>>> and women the same as men? Do you have a cite?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://dailycaller.com/2015/08/17/at...an-male-video/
>>>
>>> The good news is that you can bet the women execs are going to be real dishes - Miss Universe-class lookers.
>>
>> It's like a higher class Hooters then?
>>
>> :-)))
>>
>>> It makes me happy just thinking about it! You best believe that we got a lot to be thankful for!
>>
>> Ivanka or Chelsea on my TV?
>>
>> Hmmm...
>>
>> :-)))
>
> Is there anything more exciting that a high-paid, executive dish? Absolutely not!
>
> https://goo.gl/images/9fcs84
>
LOL!

That is so '80s, gotta love the hairstyles!

Sanders was pretty much the only decent option, but he never stood a chance as he's too 'moderate' and lacks the shallow charisma the voters love. Not to mention he isn't a corporate whore.

On 11/19/2016 7:53 PM, Jebus Jones wrote:
> Sanders was pretty much the only decent

STFU, rabbit killer.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:24:42 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 11/19/2016 7:54 PM, wrote:
>
>>> no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
>>> trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
>>> for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
>>> Janet US
>>
>> Yes, I knew it was to make it go away but also there was no guilty/not
>> guilty side to it apparently. It does not imply admission but I also
>> don't believe even a wealthy man forks out $25 mill. without a very
>> pressing reason
>>
>
>He wants to focus on running the country, not have to take time for
>court. Probably worked out cheaper for both sides. .

um-hmmm. LOL

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:34:58 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:

>On 11/19/2016 7:14 PM, wrote:
>> The only people who will count are fat, old white men.
>
>Damn, I have a bright future!
>
>> He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>>
>> Denise in NH
>>
>
>What politician has not? Every one from every party.

He chose his target supporters very well.

On 11/19/2016 8:20 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:34:58 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>> On 11/19/2016 7:14 PM, wrote:
>>> The only people who will count are fat, old white men.
>>
>> Damn, I have a bright future!
>>
>>> He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>>>
>>> Denise in NH
>>>
>>
>> What politician has not? Every one from every party.
>
> He chose his target supporters very well.
>

Good honest working folk who've been left behind.

Yes, he did.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:41:12 -0700, Sqwertz >
wrote:

> This hopeless froth after the Dems registered 3 million illegals to vote
> using dead peoples' names?
>
> Get real!

You bought fake news hook, line and sinker. The only people who have
been arrested for voter fraud were Trump voters.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:18:55 +1100, Bruce >
wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:14:14 -0800 (PST),
>> wrote:
>>
>> >I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't
>grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
>> >
>> >Denise in NH
>>
>>
>> I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
>> because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
>> bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
>> disappointment. It's probably the nastiest side of him, to take
>> advantage of them.
>
>Clinton told the "people" she was against trade agreements and wanted to
>create more jobs and then she'd turn around and tell corporations she
>was for trade agreements. That's why you should have been for Bernie
>"Honest Man" Sanders and not for Hillary "Crooked Woman" Clinton.

I'm Canadian, I didn't have a vote and I wouldn't say I was for
Hillary, but I think along with most of the world, I was against Trump
although at first I thought it was a joke and couldn't possibly
happen.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:10:44 -0700, U.S. Janet B. >
wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:24:42 -0500, Ed Pawlowski > wrote:
>
>>On 11/19/2016 7:54 PM, wrote:
>>
>>>> no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
>>>> trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
>>>> for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
>>>> Janet US
>>>
>>> Yes, I knew it was to make it go away but also there was no guilty/not
>>> guilty side to it apparently. It does not imply admission but I also
>>> don't believe even a wealthy man forks out $25 mill. without a very
>>> pressing reason
>>>
>>
>>He wants to focus on running the country, not have to take time for
>>court. Probably worked out cheaper for both sides. .
>
>um-hmmm. LOL

I decided to leave that one alone I suppose at best one can think
the lawyers must have lost out quite a bit, for a change

In article >, says...
>
> On 11/19/2016 7:54 PM, wrote:
>
> >> no, that was so he wouldn't have to testify (before inaugeration) at
> >> trial over Trump university fraud charges. He settled out of court
> >> for $25 million which means he was never found guilty of anything
> >> Janet US
> >
> > Yes, I knew it was to make it go away but also there was no guilty/not
> > guilty side to it apparently.

??????????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_University

Quite unbelievable someone with a business record like that, could be
electable as POTUS

Janet UK

wrote:
>
> On Sun, 20 Nov 2016 12:18:55 +1100, Bruce >
> wrote:
>
> >In article >,
> says...
> >>
> >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:14:14 -0800 (PST),
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I think you're totally missing the point. Most are not protesting that Clinton didn't win, although she has more than 1.3 million votes than trump and counting, they're protesting the lying scumbag who won. They hate that now we'll have rampant racism, misogyny, xenophobia and we'll all be living in a caliphate. It's already starting. trump's cabinet picks are ugly souled, just like him. The only people who will count are fat, old white men. The White House isn't
> >grand enough for him. He lied through his teeth through the whole election process and I can't wait for all his supporters to realize they were duped.
> >> >
> >> >Denise in NH
> >>
> >>
> >> I actually feel sorry for some of them - they were so desperate
> >> because their jobs were gone they believed him when he said he would
> >> bring the jobs back for them, they are in for a terrible
> >> disappointment. It's probably the nastiest side of him, to take
> >> advantage of them.
> >
> >Clinton told the "people" she was against trade agreements and wanted to
> >create more jobs and then she'd turn around and tell corporations she
> >was for trade agreements. That's why you should have been for Bernie
> >"Honest Man" Sanders and not for Hillary "Crooked Woman" Clinton.
>
> I'm Canadian, I didn't have a vote and I wouldn't say I was for
> Hillary, but I think along with most of the world, I was against Trump
> although at first I thought it was a joke and couldn't possibly
> happen.

I didn't like portions of either of them. I am glad that Hillary lost
but Trump has issues that I don't like either.
This election was seriously a lose-lose situation.

That said, he will be our next president (legally elected) and we should
give him our support. Let's see what happens. Don't like him?
Vote him out in 4 years.

It sickens me to hear all the crybaby liberals..the demonstrations by
worthless "know-it-all" teenagers, etc.

Also silly is all the adult liberals now name calling. Only dumbasses,
trailer park people, etc voted for Trump? They lost and are horrendous
sore losers. Now claiming the Electoral College is wrong. hahah Only
because Hillary lost. Plus it's the end of the world. lolol

IMO, the liberal Democrats have totally lost face with me.
What a bunch of whiney crybabies.
The only right outcome was their outcome?
Trump won fair and square. Deal with it.

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:38:57 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:41:12 -0700, Sqwertz >
>wrote:
>
>> This hopeless froth after the Dems registered 3 million illegals to vote
>> using dead peoples' names?
>>
>> Get real!
>
>You bought fake news hook, line and sinker. The only people who have
>been arrested for voter fraud were Trump voters.

Yeah. It will be interesting to see how the purveyors of fake news
deal with the recent contretemps at Facebook. There has been a
software developed that will ferret out fake news and label it. It
will even give links to the real news item. Of course, the reader
must be willing to read less delicious and provocative stuff than what
the fake news dishes out and that's so boring.

On 11/19/2016 11:38 PM, sf wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:41:12 -0700, Sqwertz >
> wrote:
>
>> This hopeless froth after the Dems registered 3 million illegals to vote
>> using dead peoples' names?
>>
>> Get real!
>
> You bought fake news hook, line and sinker.

Nope - all true:

http://www.inquisitr.com/3719036/3-m...6-predictions/

https://lockerdome.com/sgtreport/9273035047829780

According to the non-partisan group "VoteStand," following an analysis
of 180 million voter registrations, it has been determined that more
than 3 million non-citizens voted in the 2016 presidential election. Via
VoteStand Founder Gregg Phillips: Completed analysis of database of 180
million voter registrations. Number of non-citizen votes exceeds 3 million.

> The only people who have
> been arrested for voter fraud were Trump voters.

You are brainwashed to the core.

There is MASSIVE vote fraud from the Democrap party - period.

Think LBJ on steroids!

Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>

> I don't agree that she is what the country needed. Hillary was as
> divisive as Trump. What we needed was not on either ticket.

Well said.

On 11/20/2016 5:22 AM, wrote:
> I'm Canadian, I didn't have a vote and I wouldn't say


But you HAVE!

Now **** OFF OUTTA HERE BIOTCH!

YOUR opinions are UNWELCOME.

On 11/20/2016 6:04 AM, Janet wrote:
> Quite unbelievable someone with a business record like that, could be
> electable as POTUS
>
> Janet UK


Quite the aberration as only 4 of 500 business ventures have failed.

You brainwashed sot!

On 11/20/2016 8:53 AM, U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 22:38:57 -0800, sf > wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:41:12 -0700, Sqwertz >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> This hopeless froth after the Dems registered 3 million illegals to vote
>>> using dead peoples' names?
>>>
>>> Get real!
>>
>> You bought fake news hook, line and sinker. The only people who have
>> been arrested for voter fraud were Trump voters.
>
> Yeah. It will be interesting to see how the purveyors of fake news
> deal with the recent contretemps at Facebook. There has been a
> software developed that will ferret out fake news and label it.

Facebook is 100% corrupted, period.

Twitter too.

You drooling MORON!